Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

WHO to Control Health Content on YouTube

**UPDATE**

Chrstine Anderson MEP (German member of the EU Parliament) details how Youtube didn’t want the public to know what they uncovered in the EU special committee on the Corona pandemic so they simply deleted several videos.  Following legal intervention, Youtube caved and put censored videos back online.  She states:

“The impression here is that information that doesn’t fit the desired narrative should be suppressed.  I won’t stand for that.  If Youtube lets my deadline pass unused, I will file a lawsuit in court.” ~ Christine Anderson MEP for Germany

https://expose-news.com/2022/10/30/youtube-announces-partnership-with-who/

WHO to control Health content on YouTube & censor everything disputing Official Narrative so it can manipulate Public Opinion

BY  ON 

The World Health Organisation (“WHO”) is now taking control of the content that is promoted on YouTube through a partnership with Google.  The aim of the partnership is to “address the spread of misinformation and disinformation.”

“WHO and partners recognise that misinformation online has the potential to travel further, faster and sometimes deeper than the truth – on some social media platforms, falsehoods are 70% more likely to get shared than accurate news. To counter this, WHO has taken a number of actions with tech companies to remain one step ahead,” WHO states on its website.

As has been proved throughout the Covid era, the propaganda machine of governments, public health bodies and international organisations such as WHO are inverting the truth.  It is they that are spreading misinformation and disinformation while at the same time censoring the truth.  Thus, it is not misinformation and falsehoods that WHO is attempting to counteract. Rather, WHO and its partners are attempting to suppress the truth while promoting a false narrative.  (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

Nothing to see here – just more collusion between public health, Big Pharma, and the media.

It’s all about controlling the algorithm, and nobody does that better than Google & Youtube who are now going to “certify” medical professionals as “reliable” and “authoritative” sources of information.  In other words, repeat the mantra of the accepted narrative and you will be deemed “reliable,” but if you dare to have an original thought of your own,  you will be labeled as a quack who is giving “misinformation”.

If you are a doctor desiring an “eligible” channel, you must show proof of your license and follow “best practices” and have a channel in “good standing” on Youtube.  It’s even worse in the UK: only NHS organizations will be eligible.

The algorithm will prioritize eligible channels first so viewers will have to scroll down quite a ways to find content that is not WHO approved – if you can find it at all.  Many channels and experts are simply disappearing.

Remember the Global Health Summit panel with top reps from FB, Google, WHO, TickTok, Science Magazine, and Women in Global Health?  This group truly believes they are the ones needed to sift through information and “flood-in accurate information” to drown out the “vast tsunami of these compelling lies,” and to decide what is best for public consumption.

Melissa Flemming – UN Undersecretary General for Global Communications exemplifies this best with her brag at a recent WEF event, “we own the science,” as she explains how the UN also “partners with Google” on topics like “climate change,” a hotly contested political ploy many science experts state is a lie, scam, and a “gravy train” to secure research funding.  But the WHO, UN, and elites at the Global Health Summit don’t care about the opinions of actual scientists any more than Twitter, who evidently knows more about Biology than the PhDs they are censoring.

Bought out medical groups like the AMA, APhA, & ASHP, owned by a powerful mob, are going after respected, credentialed, and highly published doctors who dare to disagree with the accepted narrative and who are actually caring for patients by offering safe, effective, and cheap COVID treatments that are being censored, maligned and banned by tyrants with an agenda.  According to mainstream medicine and corrupt public health agencies, doctors should just let their patients “get sicker,” or give them expensive, toxic,  ineffective hospital treatment protocols that nurses have dubbed “death is near,” all because of the CARES Act which is paying hospitals to follow government edicts.

Some of these frustrated nurses have left the system and are offering patient advocacy services to break this unhealthy codependency between patients and the health care system.  And doctors are suing the government for suppressing effective COVID treatments and for interfering with their ability to treat patients, as well as suing medical boards for threatening doctors.

We desperately need to break the corrupt public health monopoly and have more independent community-based clinics and hospitals that do not receive funding from the corrupt government.  We also need more independent doctors.

http://

WHO to Control Health Content on YouTube

TrialSite News

Nov. 5, 2022

Category:

Activism, Treatment, Viruses

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law Has Accepted Dr. Sin Hang Lee’s Study of the Flaws of Non-Quantitative RT-PCT For SARS-CoV-2 Detection – Part 1

**UPDATE**

Go here for another excellent read on how for a 5% prevalence rate for COVID infections in a population, the 42% false positive discovery rate means that for every 50 true positives, there will be 36 false positives.  Ponder that for a moment.

COVID cases will be overstated by a factor of 72%

Due to unreliable of PCR tests:

There are no credible COVID-19 ‘vaccine’ trial data.

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/science-public-health-policy

Science, Public Health Policy & the Law has Accepted Dr. Sin Hang Lee’s Study of the Flaws of Non-Quantitative RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2 Detection – Part 1

Sanger Sequencing Provides Definitive Evidence that RT-PCR Use with No Internal Control Applied to the Problem of Diagnosis of COVID-19 is Fatally Flawed

James Lyons-Weiler

When the German team (Cormen et al. (aka “Drosten Report”)) published primers capable of detecting synthetic oligonucleotide that matched parts of the SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence published from the first clinical sample from the first patient diagnosis of pneumonia associated with a novel coronavirus, there was hope that the virus might be controlled at least until healthcare facilities could be made ready using the training and preparations they conducted during the Ebola care of 2014.

The use of PCR to detect specific sequences is trivially non-controversial, if it is done in an expert manner. First, the primers are chosen computationally to match only the target species (or quasi-species, in the case of viruses). Second, multiple targets can be selected that help nail down the results in case one of the single. Finally, if the primers are nested or hemi-nested – that is if the targets sequences overlap, a local sequence can reliably be determined on a percentage of the samples as a direct gold-standard check to estimate both the true positive rate (the probability of detecting a virus that is truly present) and the false positive rate (the probability of detecting the target when it is truly not present).

I expected when CDC’s PCR test failed that there would likely be a variety of approaches that would be developed by commercial nucleic acid technology companies. I started advocating for private mass testing, with an emphasis on “private”, expecting that accurate testing would emerge.

I was astonished when I saw that the FDA had only requested that commercial suppliers provide data on the true positive rate, but no data on the false positive rate. Worse, I was astonished to learn, upon reading the documents being submitted to the FDA, that the test kit manufacturers were not including positive control sample material to allow the determination of cycle threshold (Ct) by which one makes the call for a given patient that the virus was present or absent. Cycle thresholds are the number of rounds of amplification necessary to reach a specific point in the exponential growth of the number of copies of target sequences. This must be done for each patient separately – even if the test is the same kit done in the same lab, on the same day, by the same technician – because the amount of starting material in each swab varies.

This was the first time I had ever seen any RT-PCR-based test NOT use a positive control sample. The lack of a positive control sample means that the assay was qualitative, not the robust and rigorous qRT-PCR (“q” stands for “quantitative”. For example, even the RT-PCR test for the Monkeypox virus uses a positive control sample.

Instead of using empirically derived Ct values per patient, generic Ct values were used. These were part of the kits, but they were not published. This was unusual. I asked medical freedom activists to request from their local health department what Ct values were being used to determine a diagnosis for a patient. Multiple people did, and the reply was the same: that information is proprietary. This was ridiculous; the exact Ct being used is not a top-secret part of a test, but is, instead, an essential aspect of checking the reliability of the results of an RT-PCR test.

Go to top link for a video on RT-PCR.

The absence of a positive control target sample was a big deal because, without any data on whether tests were hitting human sequences via off-target amplification, many people would be “diagnosed” with COVID-19 who were not infected. This would not only be disruptive – the resulting huge numbers of false positives could be used to justify police actions as was going on in China at the time.

Further, people who had other respiratory illnesses like influenza, respiratory syncytial virus, bacterial pneumonia, the common cold, or other coronaviruses might not be given appropriate medical care given the isolate-and-do-nothing approach to COVID-19. Many would die from severe pneumonia that could have been prevented via medical intervention, just as antibiotics for bacterial pneumonia.

Also, it was clear that many people who were sick but did not have COVID-19 would believe thereafter they were immune, and they might risk exposures that they otherwise might not risk.

In addition, those that did then become infected after their false positive COVID-19 test might then doubt their actual case of SARS-CoV-2 infection was worth testing for and they might fail to protect others who were at the highest risk of death from COVID-19 infection – the immunocompromised and the elderly.

So I wrote to the FDA with my concerns. Dr. Peter Marks wrote back with a terse “Thank you, we will take your concerns up with my team”.

At the same time, Dr. Sin Hang Lee independently saw the same issues and was motivated to develop a Sanger sequencing-based test. His approach circumvented the risk of false positives altogether by using primer pairs that targeted parts of the SARS-CoV-2 genome in an overlapping mapper. This way, he could tell if he truly had the sequence of interest in a sample, or if one of the primer pairs was failing due to a mutation in the primer site.

Dr Sin Hang Lee in his laboratory in Milford, CT.

Dr. Lee is an extremely capable and experienced scientist and is an expert in molecular diagnosis and diagnostic pathology. The fact that he independently came to the same conclusion as I did on the risks of using RT-PCR the way CDC, ultimately, FDA allowed under emergency use authorization gave me hope.

July 2020 WWDNYK’s Unbreaking Science: CDC PCR Test Wrong 1/4 of the Time

See top link for a video from about the time I contacted FDA (Nov 2020).

After writing various blog articles and doing podcasts attempting to alert the public and health departments to these very serious issues, I was invited to testify in a case in Pennsylvania wherein a restauranteur was sued by the Commonwealth for not following the public health dictates regarding her customers.

Originally, the testimony was meant to be written. So I provided the judge with the scientific literature on measured false positive rates of the RT-PCR tests. There were about four studies that provided data that demonstrated that the false positive rates varied from 11% (Basile et al.) to as high as 38% (the Duke Marines study).

The State Epidemiology submitted her testimony at the same time, without seeing mine. (I did not see hers, either). When I was given a copy of her testimony, I could see she knew nothing about the state of the science on the use of RT-PCR as allowed by CDC and PCR. She reported to the judge in her written testimony that RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 had – get this – ZERO false positives.

That’s when the judge, for reasons I will never understand, refused both sets of written testimony, and instead decided that only verbal testimony was going to be allowed. Of course, the State’s lawyer used the only tool they had – ad hominem attack – to try to discredit me. But even that didn’t change the fact that RT-PCR tests were visiting abuse on the public via false positives as outlined above.

A group of people became increasingly aware of the issues, and together we created NAATEC, the Nucleic Acid Assay Technology Evaluation Consortium – to collect public funds and fund the comparison of RT-PCR testing to Sanger sequencing.

I am happy to report that we thereby funded research by independent research scientist Dr. Sin Hang Lee to conduct the evaluation that FDA should have required by PCR test kit manufacturers.

The study underwent a single-blind peer review with two independent reviewers not involved in the study. The peer reviewers were scientists and experts in the field. After two rounds of feedback from the reviewers, the manuscript was accepted for publication and is with the editorial production team.

Prior to publication, I am providing the title, author, and Abstract.

Evidence-Based Evaluation of PCR Diagnostics for SARS-CoV-2 and the Omicron Variants by Sanger Sequencing

Dr. Sin Hang Lee

Abstract: Both SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV-1 initially appeared in China and spread to other parts of the world. SARS-CoV-2 has generated a COVID-19 pandemic causing more than 6 million human deaths worldwide while the SARS outbreak quickly ended in six months with a global total of 774 reported deaths. One of the factors contributing to this stunning difference in the outcome between these two outbreaks is the inaccuracy of the RT-PCR tests for SARS-CoV-2, which generated a large number of false-negative and false-positive test results that have misled patient management and public health policymakers. This article presented Sanger sequencing evidence to show that the RT-PCR diagnostic protocol established in 2003 for SARS-CoV-1 can in fact detect SARS-CoV-2 accurately due to the well-known ability of the PCR to amplify similar, homologous sequences. Using nested RT-PCR followed by Sanger sequencing to retest 50 patient samples collected in January 2022 and sold as RT-qPCR positive reference confirmed that 21 (42%) were false-positive. Routine sequencing of the RT-PCR amplicons of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and N-terminal domain (NTD ) of the Spike protein (S) gene is a tool to avoid false positives and to study the effects of amino acid mutations and multi-allelic SNPs in the circulating variants for investigation of their impacts on vaccine efficacies, therapeutics. and diagnostics.

The study was partially funded by IPAK via the NAATEC. To support research like this, visit http://ipaknowledge.org/

Watch for Part 2 at the end of the month – the details of the study will be explained.

_________________

**Comment**

Dr. Lee is an unsung hero who has been outspoken many times against medical injustice:

Category:

Activism, research, Testing, Viruses

COVID Shot Causing Uptick in Lyme Disease, EBV, CF

https://www.bitchute.com/video/EvVqpTtOtIGJ/  Video Here (approx. 8 Min)

Dr. Ryan Cole explains how the mRNA Shots are causing an uptick in Lyme disease, Epstein-Barr and chronic fatigue

Highlights:

  • COVID Shots are expired products designed for a virus strain no longer in circulation
  • The Spike Protein is causing reactivation of many viruses:
    • Epstein Barr
    • Other Herpes family viruses
      • Cytomegalovirus
      • CMV
    • Unusual viruses:
      • parechoviruses
      • parainfluenza viruses
  • There is an uptick in Lyme Disease due to immune suppression (go here and read comment section)
  • The COVID shots cause mitochondrial harm
  • The COVID shots cause heart damage
  • Sudden Adult Death syndrome (SADS) wasn’t happening in 2020 during the COVD outbreak, or in 2021 before the “vaccine” mandates. These deaths started occurring in late 2021 and have continued due to people  getting 3 and 4 shots.
  • The lipid nanoparticle accumulates in the ovaries.
    • Germany has seen a 20% decrease in early 2022 of fertility rates.  Similar things are seen in Sweden, Taiwan, and other Scandinavian countries.  While correlation doesn’t equal causation, this is concerning.
  • The spike protein has affected hormonal cycles.
  • The spike protein has affected the adrenal glands (blood pressure, cortisol, etc).
  • The spike protein inflames blood vessels and a lot of clotting has been seen.

_________________

https://rumble.com/v1pugsz-its-all-parasites-cancer-vaccines-remedies.html  Video Here (Approx. 35 Min)

COVID Shots, Parasites, & Cancer

Dr. Lee Merritt weighs in on the parasites in the COVID shots and the explosion of cancer.
Excellent information.  Highly recommend.  It connects many dots on the following information as well as 5G.

Egyptian parasitologists have linked cancer being caused by parasites for a long time; however, it’s never discussed as they will lose their funding.  Cancer cells and parasite egg sacks look identical under a microscope.

It’s been difficult if not impossible to know what is in the mRNA shots due to the fact “vaccine” manufacturers are not transparent about that is actually in the vials.  Researchers have had to simply speculate based on the symptoms that followed; however, leaked documents prove what many have suspected all along: the vials are all different.  The experimental mRNA shots, under emergency use authorization (EUA) are not approved, therefore, what the public is partaking in is an ongoing clinical study with numerous arms – i.e. people are given different doses and one group is getting a placebo group (should be an inert substance).  The last group falsely believes they are getting a “vaccine.”

But some have managed to get their hands on vials to study what’s in them:
  • German scientists, without exception, have found unusual toxic components, mostly metallic, in the shots.
  • Spanish researchers found that Pfizer’s shot consists of 99% graphene oxide, a known toxin that explodes the mitochondria causing an inflammatory storm that resembles COVID itself, conveniently mudding the waters once again making everything appear to be caused by COVID.
    • Graphene is also in the PCR swabs and in masks.
    • Graphene causes hypercoagulation which causes blood clotting.
    • Graphene is a superconductor which gives a metallic taste, loss of taste and smell, and the magnetic phenomenon of being able to put a spoon on your body and have it stick.
    • In an interview with Dr. Mylo Canderian, Ph.D., developer of the graphene oxide patent as a hematological bioweapon in 2015, states those “vaccinated” with the COVID shots will all die within a maximum window of 10 years.
  • Swissmedic discovered bubbles in vials.
  • Microscopy expert Dr. Robert Young also shows that COVID vials contain graphene oxide, parasites (Trypanosoma Cruzi), stainless steel, and other metals and contents.  Please read here to learn that parasites manipulate the immune system to establish infection – often chronically and that a third of the human population may be affected.  Coinfections often hinder accurate diagnosis.
  • Dr. Carrie Madej observed graphene type substances as well as a self-aware moving substance that looks and acts like “Hydra Vulgaris.”
  • Korea Veritas Doctors for COVID 19 have also observed “moving organism.”

Dr. Merrit recommends the following anti-parasitic treatment approach:

  • Use anti-parasitics for 3 days then stop for 5 days.
  • Gradually lengthen your cycle (use for 3 days stop for 10 and so on), watching for a reaction.
  • Do this for a minimum of 2 months for an adult.
  • When you can go to monthly cycles you are on maintenance.

I also highly recommend this video with Dr. Merrit as well.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, vaccines, Viruses

Montreal’s Pediatric ERs ‘Like a Horror Film’- Stop the Infanticide & Alarming Stillbirth Data

https://montrealgazette.com/opinion/columnists/allison-hanes-situation-in-montreals-pediatric-ers-is-like-a-horror-film

Allison Hanes: Situation in Montreal’s pediatric ERs is ‘like a horror film’

The strain keeps intensifying amid an unprecedented number of sick kids at the Montreal Children’s Hospital and CHU Ste-Justine. Can a new crisis cell formed by Quebec’s health minister help?

Allison Hanes  •  Montreal Gazette

Oct 31, 2022

Excerpts:
Hundreds of them arrive every day in Montreal’s pediatric emergency rooms, and more of them than usual are so ill that they need to be admitted.
Parents camp out overnight, waiting 16, 20, even 24 hours for their children to be seen, depending on the priority they are assigned during triage. Stretchers line hallways. Medical staff are working around the clock to care for more and sicker youngsters.
Across Quebec, emergency rooms are under siege as a hobbled health system is taxed by staff shortages, a lack of access to family doctors, an aging population and patients suffering from a range of ailments that may have gone unchecked during the pandemic.
The article goes onto state that one of the culprits for children is respiratory syncytial virus or RSV, a common, familiar infection doctors know how to treat that now is causing 10 times more cases than before the pandemic.  Pregnant moms and young children weren’t out and about getting exposed and passing on or developing immunity.
The article omits that fact the COVID shots set people up for respiratory illnesses as well as the fact the staffing shortages being faced directly relate to mandating the COVID shots for healthcare workers which have been linked to the deaths of at least 80 Canadian doctors.  It also fails to admit that Canada had one of the most tyrannical lockdowns in the world.
Another perfect example of the obvious flawed COVID policies that will have long-term effects on virtually everything, that pandemic authoritarians remain silent about, are attempting to deflect, and are offering no meaningful apologies or solutions to the very devastation they caused, but are asking for amnesty.
_________________

Stop the Infanticide!

Nov. 4, 2022

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The U.S. Government’s Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) was updated today, and there are now 4,534 fetal deaths recorded in VAERS following COVID-19 vaccines given to pregnant and child-bearing women. (Source.)

And these recorded fetal deaths are but a fraction of the real number of unborn children who have died since the COVID-19 experimental vaccines were given emergency use authorization, as a previous report published for Department of Health and Human Services stated that fewer than 1% of all vaccine adverse events are actually reported to VAERS. (Source.)

Three of these fetal deaths have followed the new Bivalent COVID-19 booster shots from Pfizer and Moderna, including a 26-year-old woman from Arizona who developed breast cancer following the vaccine, and chose to have chemotherapy and terminate the life of her unborn child.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Please know that for 30 years prior to the EUA for COVID gene therapy shots, there have been 2,245 reported fetal deaths for ALL FDA-approved vaccines, or about 75 deaths per year.

A whistleblower nurse shared an email showing 500% increase in stillbirths following the COVID shots and that the trend is expected to continue.  See article link for:

  • Dr. Campbell’s report on increase neonatal deaths in Scotland
  • Dr. James Thorp (OBGYN) explain “off the charts” sudden fetal death and adverse pregnancy outcomes”.
  • Toronto-area casket manufacturer now ordering children’s coffins in bulk due to sudden demand.
  • Dr. Elizabeth Mumper states “For a first-trimester woman to get this injection, they have more of a chance of having a miscarriage or stillbirth than if they were to actually take an abortifacient.”
  • Birth rates around the world are dropping

__________________

https://rumble.com/v1piboi–i-want-it-stopped-now-obgyn-dr.-james-a.-thorp-presents-alarming-stillbirt.html

“I Want It Stopped Now!”: OB/GYN Dr. James A. Thorp Presents Alarming Stillbirth Data

Published October 23, 2022

“We’ve basically shown using government data that there is undeniable, irrefutable evidence that the vaccine is killing my patients, my women of reproductive age, my pregnant women, my pre-born babies, and my newborn babies. And I want it stopped and I want it stopped now!”

From the 10.22.2022 Florida COVID Summit

For more:

The CDC manipulates, hides, and dumps data whenever it disagrees with their accepted narrative. They’ve been doing this in Lymeland for over 40 years.  The CDC rigs the system for their own vested interests.
Time to break the public health monopoly and engage in a CDC/FDA/NIAID walkaway movement.  The CARES Act has been used to take away doctor and patient choice and freedom, and cause hospitals to become the new modern day killing fields where hospitals tyrannically refuse to allow patients have life-saving treatment because the CARES Act provides for a government-led monopoly on medicine described by many as “brutal and deadly COVID treatment protocols” that don’t work, are expensive, and are dangerously toxic.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Natural Immunity Again Found Better & Virus Hits 7:1 Vaxxed Over Unvaxxed

**UPDATE**

You may be asking yourself how the world came to believe that “vaccine” immunity is better than natural immunity.  It’s quite simple: the WHO quietly changed the definition of “herd immunity” to now only be acquired through “vaccines,” literally rewriting hundreds of years of scientific understanding just to push COVID injections.  “Vaccines” are the golden calf of Big Pharma and corrupt public health, which own patents on the very things they are supposed to protect the public from.

Despite ‘bubbles’ being found in COVID shot vials, and all of the following information below on how natural immunity is better, the virus hits the “vaxxed” 7 to 1 over the unvaxxed, the UK government reveals the triple vaxxed account for 91% of COVID deaths, the fully vaxxed account for over 90% of COVID deaths since May 2021, and much more, the Massachusetts health system is requiring employees to get the bivalent booster by Dec. 15 or be suspended without pay with disciplinary action including termination of employment.  The system also erroneously states that “masking and other protocols have been good tools for reducing the risk of COVID-19 spread over the past two and a half years,” despite data and reality showing the contrary.  Almost 700 people have signed a petition opposing the mandate calling it “nothing more than bullying by an employer for profit.”

Natural Immunity Better in New COVID “Vaccine” Studies

https://thehighwire.com/videos/natural-immunity-better-in-new-covid-vaccine-studies/  Video Here (Approx. 13 Min)

Numerous studies continue to demonstrate Covid mRNA injections not only fail to stop infection or transmission, numerous studies now have shown negative efficacy, while also establishing that natural immunity, once again, is superior to Pharma products. 

This shouldn’t shock anyone.  The COVID shots have only shown what history has repeatedly shown: natural immunity is robust, long lasting, and more complete than “vaccination.” Further, these mRNA injections actually cause pathogenic priming, specifically antibody dependent enhancement (ADE), setting you up to become infected (Please see article below titled “Virus Hits 7:1 Vaxxed Over Unvaxxed).  These injections are linked to more VAERS reports of adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS, and VAERS is known to only capture about 1% of reactions, so numbers in reality are much, much higher.

More keeps tumbling out of the COVID injection barrel of monkeys including results of lawsuits exposing the following derived from this source:

  • Of the 10 million people enrolled in V-Safe, 7.7% (770,000 people) required medical care after getting the shot 
  • 25% (2.5 million people) missed work or school or suffered a serious side effect that affected their day-to-day life
  • Four million people — 40% — reported joint pain.
  • Two million, or 20%, reported “moderate” joint pain
  • 400,000, 4%, classified the pain as “severe”
  • the formula the CDC uses to trigger a safety signal is seriously flawed, because the more dangerous a vaccine is, the less likely it is that a safety signal will be triggered.
  • even using the flawed formula, “death” meets all three safety signal criteria and should have been flagged
  • options for reporting a side effect are predefined and very generic, so people might be experiencing effects that didn’t fit any of the predefined categories of injury.
  • death is not reportable to V-Safe, as dead people cannot use their phones which makes it impossible to know how many actually have died
  • Not only has the CDC taken no action, they deliberately concealed all the V-Safe data from everyone the entire time, until they were sued.  See this three part series on how they did this: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3
  • The mainstream media are ignoring all of this which means it’s up to us to inform our loved ones. 
  • Please see this video of civil rights attorney Aaron Siri explain the data, and go here for ICAN’s V-Safe data obtained from the CDC.

The CDC needs to explain why they spent our tax dollars to fight the release of the V-Safe data for 15 months, and why they didn’t halt the shots when a “death” signal was evident. The mainstream press, members of Congress, the medical community and Universities also need to explain why they refuse to investigate  CDC data. To that end, here are a few suggestions for how you can help:

Support Sen. Ron Johnson, currently the only senator willing to investigate the truth of the COVID jabs.
Write or call your members of Congress and ask them to investigate the CDC’s safety monitoring. As noted by Kirsch, “You simply cannot have a safety agency not be able to monitor safety.”
Contact your local newspaper and urge them to investigate and report on the V-Safe data, the VAERS data and the CDC’s failure to act when a safety signal was detected.
Share the data on social media and ask why no one in the media, Congress, academia or medical community is investigating these matters.
Share this information with your doctor and members of the medical community.
Also share it with university administrators, and ask them to explain how and why, in light of these facts, they are still mandating COVID shots for their students.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/virus-hits-71-vaxxed-over-unvaxxed

Virus Hits 7:1 Vaxxed Over Unvaxxed

Data analyst Ethical Skeptic concludes from CDC, Worldometers, Walgreens data: “A 7:1 appetite in the virus for the recently vaccinated”

By Colleen Huber

Nov. 2, 2022

We have seen repeat bouts of COVID among such vaccine promoters as the Bidens, Fauci, Walensky, et al.

Could this abysmal negative efficacy of the COVID vaccines have something to do with the immune impairment that some of us were warning about since way back BEFORE most people had taken the COVID shots?  I was removed from Twitter permanently the same day, 2/19/21, that I promised a Twitter follower that the above article would be coming out shortly.  How high would COVID vaccine uptake have been if critics like me had not been removed from Twitter and suppressed on Facebook?  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

Data Analyst “Eternal Skeptic” has compiled data from Walgreens, Worldometers, and CDC showing that the COVID jabbed are 7 times as likely to test positive for COVID than the unvaccinated.  See link for graphs.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses