- Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on March 14 introduced a measure that would eliminate Dr. Anthony Fauci’s position.
- Fauci has been director of NIAID, part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), since 1984.
- Paul said the measure, proposed as an amendment to the government funding bill, is necessary because Fauci has become a “dictator-in-chief.”
Withholding data is scientific fraud
Facts Matter (Feb. 22): CDC Caught Hiding Troves of Data: Not Publishing Critical Hospitalization, Booster, and Virus Data
By Roman Balmakov
In fact, according to this report, the CDC has been collecting detailed information on COVID-19 hospitalizations for more than a year now, and this data breaks down the cases by age, by race, as well as by vaccination status. However, instead of releasing all of this information to the public, the CDC has instead been withholding most of it.
And what’s even more damning, is that it appears that the CDC was not keeping all of this information in a vault. Instead, they were selectively pushing out only the information that supported their messaging regarding boosters.
🔵 Sekur (promo code: Roman) https://ept.ms/3yW0Wul
🔵 CDC article: https://ept.ms/3JKuMaq
🔵 Scotland https://ept.ms/3HckZYU
🔵 AAP study: https://ept.ms/3IdxrsV
http:// Approx. 1 Min
CDC Withholding Data
Feb. 20, 2022
The New York Times reported this past weekend that the CDC has chosen not to publish huge amounts of COVID data, instead keeping it secret, because it fears that the information would cause ‘vaccine hesitancy’ among the American public.
The report notes that the withheld data includes informative data on boosters, hospitalizations, wastewater analyses, as well as critical information on COVID infections and deaths broken down by age, race, and “vaccination” status.
The justification for holding the information back? Fears that the data would be “ misinterpreted” and lead to “ vaccine hesitancy, ” in line with the report.
Quite simply, it didn’t fit into the narrative that everyone must get vaccinated and boosted no matter who they are and what their situation is. (See link for article)
- The data has been withheld for MORE THAN A YEAR.
- Data has been collected since COVID shots were first rolled out and the agency is afraid it will be misinterpreted.
- CDC director, Dr. Walensky admits guidance has been based on PCR tests which produce over 90% false positives, as well as stay positive for up to 12 weeks after infection.
- Guidance has also been based on what they felt people would accept.
- She also admitted that over 75% of COVID deaths in the “vaccinated” were in people who had at least 4 comorbidities. Dr. Martenson PhD, using the CDC’s own data, shows that just 0.9% of ALL deaths had no comorbidities.
CDC Hides Data to “Avoid Hesitancy”
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC @CDCgov) and the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (NYC Health @NYCHealthy) are misleading us about the risk of being unvaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (CoV2).
They are doing this through two basic errors. First, they appear to be using outdated population estimates that grossly undercount the actual number of unvaccinated persons in the United States. This leads to artificially inflated estimates of COVID-19 case rates among the ever-shrinking unvaccinated population.
Second, they appear to be counting every person for whom they cannot verify vaccination status as an “unvaccinated person.” In many cases, it appears that it is taking health agencies weeks, if not months, to properly match COVID-19 hospitalizations with vaccination status, and we have no assurance that it is ever done properly at all. This has led to some jurisdictions quietly publishing significant corrections to their data weeks after initial publication — and after the media and public health officials have already run with the erroneous numbers. This is leading to both overstatement of the COVID-19 case rate for unvaccinated persons and understatement of the same rate for vaccinated persons. (See link for article)
As NYC continues to shift unvaccinated COVID outcomes to the vaccinated side, these data will show less and less apparent vaccine efficacy, but no one will know unless this issue gets addressed not only in NYC but across the U.S.
By stacking the information deck against the public, the public health community and government are gambling with our lives. We deserve and should expect an honest accounting of COVID data devoid of bias and opacity. If truth and transparency are provided, the populace would trust these public institutions, which would lead to healthier outcomes for everyone.
Recently Dr. Vinay Prasad came out with a scathing video and article on “How the CDC Abandoned Science.” The information shared is important to know and understand; however, the CDC has been guilty of manipulating science and data for decades to suit their own purposes. One doctor has accused them of not even bothering to read the science. COVID has just made it more widely seen and experienced by the public. We need a complete overhaul of public health as these are captured agencies riddled with conflicts of interest. It’s so bad that a group within the agency called Spider has detailed the agency’s corruption.