The experimental physicist and biomaterial researcher Dr Antonietta Gatti examined various PCR test rods under the microscope and analyzed their ingredients. Antonietta M. Gatti, Ph.D. is also the coordinator of the Italian Institute of Technology’s Project of Nanoecotoxicology, called INESE.
The irritating result: the PCR test swabs are made of hard materials and contain a variety of (nano) particles made of silver, aluminium, titanium, glass fibres etc, many of which are undeclared in the package leaflet. When they enter the mucous membrane, they can cause wounds and inflammation, the scientist said. ENT doctors told 2020News that they are finding more hardened mucous membranes in people who are often tested for SARS-CoV-2. No longer intact mucous membranes can no longer fulfill their task of repelling viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the airways, as the pediatrician Eugen Janzen also reports. The germs thus penetrate into the airways without any immune filter.
Particularly problematic in this context: the warm breath moisture under the masks is the ideal breeding ground for germs of all kinds.
(See link for article and amazing microscopy)
According to another independent test on PCR swabs in Slovakia, the material they found was Darpa patented hydrogel, lithium, and nylon.
”After spawning a mixture of nylon fiber fragments, Darpa Hydrogel remains on the nasal mucosa under the pituitary and pineal gland along with lithium. This mixture immediately reacts with living structures to form crystals that are directionally oriented to the pineal gland, which has its own electromagnetic field. The shape of the crystals determines the type of hydrogel used. The crystals are conductive due to the lithium contained in it. The crystals can receive the signal from the transmitter to the cell and transmit signals from the cell to the transmitter. These are actually nano-antennas.”
According to the article, lithium as well as aluminum and mercury (widely used in vaccines) are highly toxic to the pineal gland influence. In low doses lithium blocks it and in higher doses it can completely destroy it.
”Darpa Hydrogel and lithium block and destroy the pineal gland and cause the thinking person to become a controllable biorobot. A hydrogel is a carrier of an active substance, its task is to get the substance into the body at a pre-desired place.” – Nutritruth.org
Interestingly, Ivermectin which has been found to be an effective, safe treatment for COVID, dissolves the hydrogel crystals. This cheap treatment has been widely censored by our corrupt public health ‘officials’.
PCR tests despite their great erroneous false positives and lack of gold standard also contain ethylene oxide, used as a pesticide in agriculture which just happens to cause cancer.
Gatti’s research shows the PCR swab destroys our natural mucosa membrane leaving us more susceptible to further viral infection. Additionally, it appears the hydrogel is causing blood clots in the blood vessels.
It is also ironic that getting COVID injections also makes people more susceptible to further viral infection. Efficacy is extremely low. In fact, they are estimated to be less than 1% effective. Further, the injections do not prevent infection or transmission. All gene-based injections can be expected to cause blood clotting, bleeding, and other adverse events, particularly with:
each re-vaccination and each intervening coronavirus exposure. Over time, whether months or years , this renders both vaccination and coronaviruses dangerous to young and healthy age groups, for whom without vaccination COVID-19 poses no substantive risk. Source
..after saying that indeed those who are vaccinated DO get more acute pathogen-creating illness, like CORONAVIRUS, that should make us all wonder if there are any connections here. The acknowledging that patients DO get ill after flu shots from these other viruses (VIRAL INTERFERENCE) is priceless yet disturbing. Basically patients have been made to feel like they were wrong for decades. I am sure deaths too, have been involved but to correctly blame it on the vaccine has been taboo. Mutating bacteria and viruses are possible for sure and vaccines can also be responsible for that. Source
Please see the following video on 5G plus Graphene Nanoparticles.
Graphene Oxide nanoparticles have been found by electron microscopy and spectroscopy, among other techniques in the COVID PCR and antigen testing swabs, masks, and injections.
The flu vaccine contained graphene oxide nanoparticles and the new flu vaccines and the new intranasal COVID vaccines they are preparing also contain huge doses of graphene oxide nanoparticles.
Graphene nanoparticles cause hypercoagulation (thick blood) which in turn causes blood clotting. It also causes a cytokine storm that alters the immune system negatively and lessens glutathione. It is a a superconductor. If exposed you get a metallic taste in the mouth and eventually a loss of taste and smell. It also explains the magnetic phenomenon (being able to put metal on the injection site and having it stick) after receiving the COVID injection.
We had access to a sealed vial from Pfizer, and by means of a request for services to a university, specifically in my name, it was sent for an analysis of the vial, where we were looking for the material in question: graphene. After some time of investigation by Dr. Pablo Campra Madrid, Doctor in Chemical Sciences, Bachelor in Biological Sciences and member of the University of Almeria, we obtained this preliminary report where we are told that there is indeed solid evidence of graphene oxide in the sample and that it is also the main component of what they wrongly called a vaccine.
In short, graphene oxide behaves exactly like the supposed SARS-CoV-2 of the official version, generating the same symptomatology of severe COVID-19. When installed at the neuronal level, it causes neurodegeneration or, in other words, neurological COVID-19.
So, from here we started to see what possible compounds, drugs and treatments could degrade graphene oxide. And look what we found: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) or glutathione administered degrades it. Because what glutathione does is counteract free radicals and oxidants, all the toxins that can enter the body.
We now fully understand why those treatments worked: because they addressed all the symptoms of the disease supposedly caused by SARS-CoV-2. Given that to date there is no scientific evidence of an actual sequencing and isolation of SARS-CoV-2, we suspect with many credible indications that COVID-19 disease is actually the side effect of the introduction of graphene oxide into the body by different ways.
‘Researchers at Karolinska Institutet, the University of Manchester and Chalmers University of Technology have shown that the human immune system handles graphene oxide in a manner similar to pathogens, possibly leading to safer biomedical applications in the future.’ Source
Dr. José Luis Sevillano proposes a preventive treatment for Panamanian colleagues who at a conference were very interested in treating patients with zinc, glutathione, and N-acetylcysteine (NAC). These antioxidants have been found to help the body detoxify graphene oxide.
Of note: The FDA is trying to ban NAC. Coincidence?
Also, COVID broke out first in Wuhan, China where 5G was first rolled out in late November, 2019.
One definitely gets the feeling those in power do not want people to achieve health.
Another doctor addresses graphene oxide here.
Another doctor’s take on it here.
As stated by this group of researchers:
The masks being used and currently marketed contain graphene oxide. Not only the ones that were withdrawn at the time, as indicated by the media, the swabs used in both PCR and antigen tests also contain graphene oxide nanoparticles.
The COVID vaccines in all their variants, AstraZeca, Pfizer, Moderna, Sinovac, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, etc., also contain a considerable dose of graphene oxide nanoparticles. This has been the result of their analysis by electron microscopy and spectroscopy, among other techniques used by various public universities in our country. Source
Canadians are being advised not to use specific types of graphene containing masks as they could be harmful.
This article points out the graphene in face masks are nanoscopically thin, hexagonally-arranged flakes of carbon atoms. Current science indicates that if the material is inhaled and gets into the lower lungs, it can lead to an inflammatory response at high enough concentrations. There is also evidence that the jagged edges of graphene particles can harm cells, also leading to damage. The author states he reached a “dead end” in his search for evidence on the release of graphene particles in face masks.
He states lack of findings are a red flag because small quantities of this material have the potential to cause a lot of harm – 5-10 um in diameter could potentially be a health hazard.
The irony here is that hundreds of millions of dollars have been poured into studying the risks of engineered nanomaterials over the past couple of decades. Yet when it comes to real-world products and real-world risks, no-one seems to be asking the questions that count, or providing answers! – Andrew Maynard
It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to see the potential problem here so poignantly pointed out by free-lance investigative journalist Jon Rappoport: