Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

CDC Recommends Newborns Be Tested For Coronavirus Twice & Separated From Mothers With Confirmed Or Suspected COVID-19 News Video Here

CDC Recommends Newborns Be Tested For Coronavirus Twice And Separated From Mothers With Confirmed Or Suspected COVID-19

By Dr. Maria Simbra

PITTSBURGH (KDKA) — The CDC has new guidelines for newborns of mothers with or suspected of having coronavirus.

“The recommendation is the baby be tested sometime around 24 hours after birth. And if the test is negative, they’re recommending a second test at 48 hours,” says Dr. Paul Weinbaum, an obstetrician at the Allegheny Health Network.

(See link for article)



This is an example of how policy IS being made utilizing flawed antibody tests that the CDC states shouldn’t be used to set policy:

Testing is also being used in ‘contact tracing’ to monitor people and quarantine them:

  • NY Contact Tracers are paid $65,000 and given unrestrained power to punish“violators” with civil and criminal penalties.

Right here in Wisconsin, Governor Evers is pushing ‘contact tracing’ as part of the Badger Bounce-Back Program:  DHS is coordinating the amount of tracers with the number of projected tests and positive cases with the goal of having 1,000 statewide tracers.


Antibody Tests for COVID-19 Wrong Up To Half the Time, CDC Says

Antibody tests for Covid-19 wrong up to half the time, CDC says

(CNN) Antibody tests used to determine if people have been infected in the past with Covid-19 might be wrong up to half the time, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in new guidance posted on its website.

Antibody tests, often called serologic tests, look for evidence of an immune response to infection. “Antibodies in some persons can be detected within the first week of illness onset,” the CDC says.

They are not accurate enough to use to make important policy decisions, the CDC said.

Serologic test results should not be used to make decisions about grouping persons residing in or being admitted to congregate settings, such as schools, dormitories, or correctional facilities,” the CDC says.

(See link for article)

This should ring a bell with Lyme/MSIDS patients.
Remember testing for tick-borne illness?  Well, COVID-19 testing is just as bad, yet is being used to set policy. Contact Governor Evers and our representatives and senators and let them know you don’t want to be confined to your home based on a faulty test that is wrong half the time.
For more on COVID-19 testing:  

Quote of the Week

  Approx. 2.5 Min.

Jan 2015

“We Are Taking Genetically Modified Organisms and Injecting Them Into Little Kids’ Arms, We Just Shoot them Into the Vein.”

Well, that’s not quite right, vaccines are injected into the muscle, but you get the idea.

Remember, it is this man and his money that controls the current COVID-19 narrative:  The experimental vaccine, funded by the Gates Foundation, requires a special device that uses electricity to drive DNA into cells of the body.

All this, and yet Gates doesn’t vaccinate his own children:



Health Passport Scandal UK

  Approx. 9 Min.

Health Passport Scandal UK

The health passport being introduced, is the mass surveillance of every man, woman and child in real time. https://www.digitalmarketplace.servic…  (News Video in Link) Boris Johnson Announces the Test & Trace System will launch today in the UK.

People will be asked to isolate for 14 days if they come into contact with someone infected with coronavirus – even if they do not have symptoms, Boris Johnson has announced.

The new NHS test and trace programme will launch on Thursday across England, involving an army of 25,000 contact tracers and an additional 25,000 people working to process tests.

Tracers will hunt down anyone who has been within two metres of an infected person for more than 15 minutes without protective equipment.

Meanwhile, here in the U.S., the Centers for Destroyed Credibility (CDC) is going door to door collecting peoples’ DNA.  Does anyone see a problem here?
Patent #WO2020060606, which is described as a “Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data,” senses body activity of the user.
Human body activity associated with a task provided to a user(1) may be used in a mining process of a cryptocurrency system. A server may provide a task to a device of a user which is communicatively coupled to the server(2). A sensor communicatively coupled to or comprised in the device(3) of the user may sense body activity of the user. Body activity data may be generated based on the sensed body activity of the user. The cryptocurrency system communicatively coupled to the device of the user may verify if the body activity data satisfies one or more conditions set by the cryptocurrency system(4), and award cryptocurrency to the user whose body activity data is verified.”(5)
The patent states that “conditions set by the cryptocurrency system” can be awarded cryptocurrency to the user.  In other words, if you are a good boy or girl you get points.  What happens if you aren’t a good boy or girl?
Apple already has an app for all of this:  It doesn’t matter if it’s the antibody test or the PCR.  They are both worthless and shouldn’t be used for diagnosis, let alone for quarantining people.  Put an end to CDC/NIH corruption.

Right here in Wisconsin, Governor Evers is pushing ‘contact tracing’ as part of the Badger Bounce-Back Program:  DHS is coordinating the amount of tracers with the number of projected tests and positive cases with the goal of having 1,000 statewide tracers.

iOS 13.5 Update: Apple Makes the iPhone Face Mask & Contract Tracing App-Ready

iOS 13.5 update: Apple makes the iPhone face mask and contract tracing app-ready

Posted by

The new iOS 13.5 update for the iPhone has just launched and it’s ready to end all of your troubles with using Apple’s Face ID when wearing a face mask, and it seeds a way for your local public health agencies to develop contact tracing apps. (See link for article)


Important excerpt:  

This framework will allow governments and public health agencies to develop apps that alert you if you’ve come into contact with someone who later tests positive for Covid-19 and that person anonymously logs their positive result into a database.

We are told the actual contact tracing apps aren’t here yet but 22 countries across five continents have requested and received access to the API.

They also say that everything is being done to protect user privacy.

“It’s ready to end all of your troubles”…..  Ha, ha, ha... that’s about the funniest thing I’ve heard all week.

Besides the invasion of privacy, testing has been proven to be worthless for COVID-19 and shouldn’t be used for diagnosis let alone for quarantining people:

Meanwhile, the Center For Damaged Credibility (CDC) is going door to door collecting peoples’ DNA:

Put these fraudsters in jail:

Cloth Masks – Useless Against COVID-19

Cloth Masks Are Useless Against COVID-19

 Approx. 13 Min.
Lisa Brosseau, ScD, is a nationally recognized expert on infectious diseases. Brousseau taught for many years at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She may be retired from the university, but she’s not retired from teaching. She recently cowrote an opinion piecethat drew a lot of notice: In it Brousseau argues that cloth masks offer no protection from COVID-19. As one might imagine, it drew a lot of attention and caused a fair amount of controversy. She recently sat down with Infection Control Today®to talk about her strong feelings about cloth masks and that data she used to reach her conclusions. (See link for article)
I’m so thankful more and more qualified infectious disease experts are speaking out on the madness of face-mask wearing.
Brousseau recommends social distancing, while others have stated should only be done by the elderly and infirm:
More on face masks:

Cahill is looking at legal action against the Irish government for making policy that is harming people.  She states that there should be a public debate which includes not only those making policy but scientists who thinks like she does to hold authorities accountable.  We should do the same.

Most importantly she states we should make sure that this NEVER happens again.  I concur.  Get a copy of “Virus Mania,” and you will see that there has been a historical trend which rose to a fever-pitch draconian policy with COVID-19, but it’s been done many times before. Our grandmas were right: A virus just runs its course.

Letter to CDC Dr. Beard: Why Isn’t Direct Detection Of Lyme Disease a Priority?

Johns Hopkins: “The Path to Better Diagnostic Tests is Through Innovative Research”

MAY 23, 2020 — 

For those who are as outraged as I am over the 40-year avoidance of direct detection tests for Lyme disease, Ben Beard’s email address is:

Email addresses for Health and Human Services employees are public record:

———- Original Message ———-
Cc: (98 Undisclosed recipients)
Date: May 23, 2020 at 9:16 AM
Subject: Johns Hopkins: “The Path to Better Diagnostic Tests is Through Innovative Research”

May 23, 2020

National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases
1600 Clifton Road
Atlanta GA 30329-4027 USA
Attn: Ben Beard, PhD Chief, Bacterial Diseases Branch, Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, NCEZID

Dr. Beard,

Please take a moment and listen to Dr. John Aucott’s 4min video regarding direct diagnostic tests for Lyme disease……


The Path to Better Diagnostic Tests is Through Innovative Research  (Great Video Here)

Quote from Aucott’s video:

“The COVID pandemic underscores the importance of having a direct diagnostic test for an infectious disease.”


It’s been four decades since Lyme was discovered so what was the motivation for the delay Dr. Beard? Direct diagnostic tests for Lyme disease have the capability to overturn the long-established dogma that persistent infection after antibiotic treatment does not exist.

A supporter of my petition forwarded your communication regarding the status of Direct Detection Tests for Lyme Disease and you replied with the following:

Statement from Ben Beard of the CDC: “CDC is not primarily an agency that funds extramural research as does several of our sister federal agencies.”

I would like to point out that the CDC has given Dr. Gary Wormser of New York Medical College an open checkbook using grant# RO1 CK 000152 which continues to be used today.

Here is a screenshot from NIH RePORTER:

That 1.5 million dollar grant was used to focus on the acute stage of disease after early treatment intentionally avoiding the horribly disabled Lyme patient population as exposed in the “Under our Skin” documentary. [1] The conclusion of that study: Lyme is no big deal and nothing more than the “aches and pains of daily living.” [2]

Wormser continues to use funding source RO1 CK 000152 for his propaganda.

Dr. Beard…… It appears that the CDC has its own department for direct detection of infections:

Office of Advanced Molecular Detection

Focus: To bring advanced technologies, including next-generation sequencing and bioinformatics, into the US public health system in order to more effectively prevent and respond to important public health threats.

Some key activities:

-Improve pathogen identification and characterization of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and other pathogens using next-generation sequencing and other advanced molecular technologies.

-Catalyze the adoption of next-generation sequencing at CDC and in state and local health departments.

-Build staff capacity in genomic sequencing, bioinformatics, and molecular epidemiology at CDC and state public health laboratories.

-Establish enhanced, sustainable, and integrated laboratory information systems.

-Develop tools for prediction, modeling, and early recognition of emerging infections.


So why isn’t Lyme disease a priority for the Office of Advanced Molecular Detection for developing a more accurate Lyme test Dr. Beard?? It appears that you are providing lip service with no intention of insuring that direct detection methods for Lyme are brought to market. One might think that the CDC is colluding to hide the severity of Lyme because the truth about the devastating effects of chronic Lyme would finally be exposed.

A response to this inquiry is requested. (But will most likely be avoided as usual)

Respectfully Submitted,

Carl Tuttle

Lyme Endemic Hudson, NH

Cc: Rima Khabbaz, MD, Director, NCEZID


[1] Under our Skin 5min extended trailer
[2] Feb 4, 2020 complaint regarding the misuse of taxpayer dollars



Tuttle asks a great question and one that deserves an answer.  Antibody testing for Lyme and the other coinfections is abysmal.  We desperately need direct testing, but there has been a concerted effort by authorities against direct testing:  

Never forget that the very folks at the table making decisions for patients have their hands in pharmaceutical coffers with patents on testing for Lyme: ConflictReport

According to Professor Laane; however, microscopy is considered the Golden Standard in diagnostics for Syphilis, and would be the ideal test for Lyme.

Dr. Aucott states the PCR is a direct test and is being used for COVID-19.  Unfortunately, it’s accuracy has been called into question as well: The creator of the PCR is quite clear it was never intended and shouldn’t be used to diagnose patients. Another expert states he doubts the PCR test is ever true.  Then there’s the president of Tanzania sending in samples from goats, fruit, and motor oil, giving them human names, and having half return positive from the WHO PCR test:  I think we can safely say the PCR is not working for COVID-19.