Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Who Funds Your Doctor’s Training?

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/who-funds-your-doctors-training?

Who Funds Your Doctor’s Training?

Nearly half of all continuing medical education in America is funded by the companies whose products doctors prescribe. IMA Academy is building the alternative.

Independent Medical Alliance

Aug 22, 2026

A lecture hall of robots in white coats facing a screen displaying the rod of Asclepius

Every year, the doctors we rely on are required to complete continuing medical education, or CME, to keep their licenses current. Every state medical board demands it. It is how new evidence travels from the journal to the exam room, and for most patients it is entirely invisible. Nobody asks their physician where they earned their last twelve credits, or who paid for the room.

But somebody pays for it, and a great deal of it is paid for by the companies whose products doctors prescribe.

  • $815 million in direct industry grants
  • $725 million in advertising and exhibit fees
  • Roughly $1.5 billion altogether, or 40 cents of every dollar

Source: ACCME 2024 Annual Data Report.

Taken together, more than 40% of continuing medical education funding comes from pharmaceutical and medical-device companies.

When medical education depends on that kind of money, we have to ask how it influences the subjects being taught, the speakers being elevated, and the treatments being emphasized. Could this help explain why oncologists overlook the potential of repurposed medicines? Or why psychiatrists often reach for the prescription pad before exploring alternatives?

Continuing medical education was once largely a profession teaching itself, led by medical societies, universities, and hospitals. Its purpose was simple: keep physicians current and improve patient care. By the mid-2000s, industry supplied about half its funding, and a Senate investigation found drug companies using educational grants to build markets and influence what doctors were taught.

Which brings us to IMA Academy

We are building the long-overdue independent alternative: accredited courses taught by independent physicians, with no pharmaceutical or medical-device sponsorship.

Donors make that possible by funding course development, the accreditation work behind every credit, independent faculty who answer to evidence rather than sponsors, and free public access.

______________

**Comment**

HALLELUIAH!

Many are unaware that doctors receive financial kickbacks for vaccinated patients, despite having limited education and training regarding vaccines. The U.S. Government continues to pay millions for vaccine injuries and death settlements, but the indoctrination appears complete with professional medical organizations like the AMA screaming the loudest whenever the vaccine discussion crops up. This corrupt organization has the gall to review their own vaccine safety and efficacy reviews. So much for honest science.

WHO: Pandemic Determinations Can Be Made Without ‘Evidence of Illness’

WHO Says Pandemic Determinations Can Be Made Without ‘Evidence of Illness’

“Evidence of illness is not required” to trigger international pandemic reporting, the World Health Organization declares.

Jon Fleetwood

Aug 21, 2026

Important Excerpts:

The World Health Organization (WHO) says evidence that a person is actually sick is not required for a “laboratory-confirmed” human influenza infection with “the potential to cause a pandemic” to trigger mandatory international reporting.

WHO says countries must “immediately notify WHO of any laboratory-confirmed case of a recent human infection caused by an influenza A virus with the potential to cause a pandemic.”

(See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

This ‘Laboratory-confirmed’ finding is based on PCR which doesn’t directly observe a virus.

COVID, which has been described as a ‘casedemic,’ showed the world the inaccuracy of PCR tests, particularly when ‘the powers that be’ manipulate the cycling threshold for their own nefarious purpose. Lymeland also includes a chapter where PCR was used to ‘prove’ extended antibiotics don’t work, causing untold needless suffering.

Now, following in a similar ugly vein, the WHO says you don’t even have to show ANY evidence of illness for them to blow your world up by declaring a ‘pandemic,’ and shutting down businesses, schools, etc.

Have we truly learned nothing from the COVID experiment?

For more:

Pfizer’s Lyme Vaccine Just Cleared EU Review. Is the Stock Already Priced In?

https://www.tikr.com/blog/pfizers-lyme-vaccine-just-cleared-eu-review-is-the-stock-already-priced-in

Pfizer’s Lyme Vaccine Just Cleared EU Review. Is the Stock Already Priced In?

Gian Estrada•6 minute read

Reviewed by:David Hanson

Last updated Aug 17, 2026

MerinoPhotos and Max Mishin from Pexels

Key Takeaways for Pfizer Stock as of August 2026

  • Lyme Validation: The European Medicines Agency validated the marketing application for Pfizer and partner Valneva’s Lyme disease vaccine candidate PF-07307405 on August 14, starting the formal EU review with a possible US filing later this year.
  • Street Split: Pfizer stock carries 8 buys, 2 outperforms, 16 holds, 1 underperform, and 1 sell among 26 analysts, with a $29 mean target sitting 7% above the $27 close.
  • Model Gap: TIKR pegs Pfizer stock at $29 by 2030, a 9% return.
  • Insider Buying: CEO Albert Bourla bought $1.0M of stock at $26.34 in mid-August while director Mortimer Buckley added $960K at $25.52 days earlier, two of the largest insider purchases logged this year.

Pfizer Stock’s Lyme Vaccine Just Cleared Its First EU Hurdle

Pfizer (PFE) stock’s Lyme disease vaccine program took a real step forward on August 14, when the European Medicines Agency validated the marketing authorization application for candidate PF-07307405, developed with French vaccine maker Valneva. Validation starts the formal EU review clock. It doesn’t guarantee approval, but it confirms the dossier is complete enough for regulators to evaluate.

The filing rests on Phase 3 VALOR data showing more than 70% efficacy in people aged five and older, with no safety concerns identified. Valneva shares jumped 15.6% on the news, its best single-day move since August 2025. Kempen analysts called the Lyme program “the key” driver of the investment case and flagged a possible US filing from Pfizer in the second half of 2026, with a US approval decision potentially landing in the second half of 2027. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

If you haven’t felt the vibe yet, I’ll clue you in: it’s all about money. Nothing whatsoever to do with health.

When it comes to ‘vaccines,’ never expect a straight, transparent answer. Just don’t. Then, you won’t be disappointed.

‘Vaccines’ are by far the biggest cash cow for Big Pharma. Just read the article & learn that Pfizer’s own CEO bought $1.0M of stock at $26.34 in mid-August while director Mortimer Buckley added $960K at $25.52 days earlier, two of the largest insider purchases logged this year. This should be illegal.

Further, you can’t create a ‘vaccine’ for a chronic/relapsing illness, which is often complicated by numerous coinfections, none of which are in the vaccine, – which is exactly what Lyme/MSIDS is, despite public health ‘authorities’ and bought out researchers claims. It’s also created with the very same OspA protein which caused people that took the Lymerix vaccine to develop debilitating chronic Lyme symptoms. The claim that it was removed due to ‘lack of demand,’ only tells part of the story. Nobody wanted an injection that made them sick!

For a refresher course on the Lyme vaccine:

John Miller Was So Sick With Chronic Lyme Disease He Was Passing Out

In the following article and video, Dr. Julian Douwes of St. George Hospital states that Miller was ‘cured’ of Lyme disease. Please note what I wrote in the comment section:

“BS. I spoke with Douwes’ father at a convention on this very topic and he was at least honest enough to admit patients need follow up or ‘tune ups.’ This is not cured. There is no cure for Lyme/MSIDS – you maintain it like diabetes. I’m not stating the treatment doesn’t have merit and won’t help patients. I’m solely addressing the ‘cured’ issue. Further, 3 weeks is far too soon to be declaring anyone ‘cured.’ Since this is relapsing in nature due to pleomorphism (organism shape shifting to go dormant when threatened) it might take weeks, months, or even years to relapse with symptoms.

It’s important to note that under Jauregg’s treatment of syphilis with malaria, several patients died after being given a potent strain.”

https://rumble.com/v7ec25w-john-miller-was-so-sick-with-chronic-lyme-disease-he-was-passing-out Go here for article & video

John Miller was so sick with chronic Lyme disease he was passing out

Question Everything

John Miller was so sick with chronic Lyme disease he was passing out and could barely take part in life.

He flew to a clinic in Germany and after three weeks, he came home cured.

“We heat the body to 106.8 Fahrenheit,” says Dr. Julian Douwes of St. George Hospital. “It has been shown that the spirochetes, the bacteria behind Lyme disease, actually dies off at that temperature.”

Antibiotics can’t reach chronic Lyme. “It’s in the brain. It’s intracellular. They have a lot of immune evading mechanisms.”

The idea won a Nobel Prize in 1927. Syphilis comes from the same family of bacteria as Lyme, and back then there were no antibiotics. So Julius Wagner-Jauregg injected his syphilis patients with the blood of malaria patients. The fever spikes cured them. He had 18 patients. 16 came out of a wheelchair.

Meanwhile, chronic Lyme patients today are being “ignored and tossed away.”

“They actually have a positive lab test and people still tell them your symptoms are not valid, your symptoms do not exist, chronic Lyme doesn’t exist.”

The treatment isn’t available in the United States.
https://x.com/epochhealth/status/2089336089530048933?s=20

_______________

**Comment**

It’s also important to clarify that hyperthermia is NOT the only modality used at St. George’s. IV antibiotics are also used as well as detoxification protocols and physical therapy. It also says that with patients with ‘confirmed’ coinfections, they use photodynamic therapy and apheresis. It’s important to point out that it’s highly likely you must test positive on tests that are wrong upto 90% of the time. So – you won’t get treated for coinfections which are as bad if not worse than Lyme.

For more:

Morens Guilty

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/morens-guilty?

MORENS GUILTY

We speculated that Moren would enter a plea bargain and turn state’s evidence on his co-conspirators. The fact that co-conspirators were numbered in his case bodes well for follow-up prosecutions.

James Lyons-Weiler, PhD

Aug 19, 2026

David M. Morens, a former senior adviser in the Office of the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, pleaded guilty on August 18, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland to Count One: conspiracy to commit offenses against and to defraud the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. The signed plea agreement is unusually informative: it says the conspiracy contemplated violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1519 (destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in a federal matter), 18 U.S.C. § 2071(a) (concealment, removal, mutilation, or destruction of federal records), and 18 U.S.C. § 201(c) (illegal gratuities). Morens admitted guilt to the § 371 conspiracy; the government agreed that the remaining open counts would be dismissed at sentencing. [1]

According to DOJ, after NIH terminated the grant Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence, Morens and others anticipated Freedom of Information Act requests and agreed in writing to shift communications concerning the grant, NIH funding, and COVID-19 origins to Morens’s personal Gmail account rather than his official NIH account. DOJ says those communications included nonpublic NIH information, edits to letters intended for NIH leadership, efforts to restore funding to the grant recipient, and information “back-channeled” to a senior NIAID official. Morens also admitted that the conspiracy involved illegal gratuities: a co-conspirator sent him wine after his “behind-the-scenes shenanigans,” and further high-end meals were discussed. [2]

The criminal case establishes intentional misconduct concerning federal records, government processes, and gratuities—not the origin of the virus. Prosecutors have not accused Anthony Fauci of wrongdoing in Morens’s case. [3]

The connection to the underlying grant is nevertheless real rather than speculative. HHS records identify NIAID award R01AI110964, “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence,” as an EcoHealth Alliance award beginning June 1, 2014; the original FY2014 award action was $666,442. DOJ expressly says the grant recipient made a subaward to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Public records and major-news reporting make EcoHealth Alliance and its then-president Peter Daszak the overwhelmingly likely identities of “Company 1” and “Co-Conspirator 1,” although DOJ deliberately leaves them unnamed in the plea documents. The Washington Post reports that previously released records likewise point to Boston University scientist Gerald Keusch as “Co-Conspirator 2.” Neither Daszak nor Keusch was reported charged in this case as of August 19. [4]

On sentencing, there is an important correction to some commentary: there is no publicly agreed or recommended prison term in the plea agreement. The statutory range is zero to five years’ imprisonment, up to three years of supervised release, a maximum $250,000 fine, and a $100 special assessment. The parties stipulated to guideline calculations that, after the anticipated three-level acceptance-of-responsibility reduction, produce offense level 15, with Morens permitted to argue for another two-level reduction under the “zero-point offender” provision. If that reduction applies, the level would be 13. Both sides expressly reserved the right to advocate for a reasonable sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). Sentencing is scheduled for November 12, 2026, before U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis. [5]

Morens’s plea materially strengthens the proposition that an NIAID senior adviser intentionally circumvented federal recordkeeping and public-access mechanisms while helping people with a direct interest in the controversial coronavirus grant. As presented, the case does not strengthen the virological evidence that the pandemic began in a laboratory nearly as much as it strengthens the evidence of a transparency and government-integrity failure.

(Click top link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

The ‘must read’ article includes a timeline of actions of David Morens and EcoHealth and so much more.

Weiler states that prosecutors did not accuse Fauci of wrongdoing in Morens’s case. My guess is they will make Morens the ‘fall guy’ and Fauci will continue to walk free. It’s also important to note that many other people were involved in this monolithic crime that remain unnamed and free.

For more: