https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cia-project-artichoke-hiding-mind-control-drugs-vaccines-precursor-mk-ultra/?

Project Artichoke: 70 Years Ago, CIA Discussed Hiding Mind-Control Drugs in Vaccines

A recently unearthed April 23, 1952, CIA document, “Special Research for Artichoke,” describes a series of ideas for how to develop chemicals designed to alter human behavior and thought. The proposals contained in the document were part of the CIA’s top-secret Project Artichoke, which ran from 1951 to 1956, according to The Daily Mail.

cia logo, brain with vaccine in it

In the 1950s, the CIA brainstormed ways to secretly perform mind control on humans — including concealing drugs in vaccines and widely consumed food products, a newly unearthed CIA document revealed. The Daily Mail first reported the story on Monday.

The seven-page document, “Special Research for Artichoke,” is dated April 23, 1952. It describes a series of ideas for how to develop chemicals designed to alter human behavior and thought.

The proposals contained in the document were part of the CIA’s top-secret Project Artichoke, which ran from 1951 to 1956, according to The Daily Mail.

The document, declassified in 1983, recently circulated on social media. However, it was not published in the CIA’s online reading room until last year.

“Some of the suggestions are controversial,” the document states. The proposals included administering drugs in secret as part of a “long-range approach to subjects.”

According to the document:

“This study should include chemicals or drugs that can effectively be concealed in common items such as food, water, coca cola, beer, liquor, cigarettes, etc.

“This type of drug should also be capable of use in standard medical treatments such as vaccinations, shots, etc.”

CIA experimented on humans as part of Project Artichoke

The document also included a special field of research for “bacteria, plant cultures, fungi, poisons of various types, etc.,” that are “capable of producing illnesses which in turn would produce high fevers, delirium, etc.”

This included “species of the mushroom” that “produce a certain type of intoxication and mental derangement.”

Also among the proposals was a suggestion to research “diet” or “dietary deficiencies” on prisoners and on people undergoing interrogation, including using “specially canned foods having elements removed.”

The document included proposals for both short-term and long-term use on humans. Drugs deemed most suitable for long-term use would be designed to produce an “agitating effect (producing anxiety, nervousness, tension, etc.) or a depressing effect (creating a feeling of despondency, hopelessness, lethargy, etc.).”

According to The Daily Mail, the CIA experimented on humans as part of Project Artichoke. The experiments often involved “vulnerable subjects, including prisoners, military personnel and psychiatric patients.” The experiments were usually performed “without informed consent.”

According to Ben Tapper, a Nebraska chiropractor who was included in the “Disinformation Dozen” list in 2021 for questioning vaccine safety, the document exposes “a disturbing reality that government agencies have historically explored ways to manipulate human behavior through chemical and biological means, including concepts involving food and medical interventions.”

“This is not speculation or conspiracy, and it should deeply concern every American who values bodily autonomy and informed consent,” Tapper said.

Precursor to the CIA’s MK-Ultra mind control experiments?

The Daily Mail cited CIA documents suggesting that U.S. intelligence agencies were concerned that enemy nations had developed their own mind and behavioral control techniques. This led the agency to prioritize the development of its own methods.

Project Artichoke “served as a precursor” to the MK-Ultra program, which the CIA launched in 1953. That program “broadened mind-altering experiments on a larger scale,” The Daily Mail reported.

Many of the documents related to this type of experimentation were destroyed in 1973, “leaving the full extent of the research and how far it progressed unknown.”

Naomi Wolf, Ph.D., CEO of Daily Clout and author of “The Pfizer Papers: Pfizer’s Crimes Against Humanity,” told The Defender that the documents further confirm a long history of intelligence agency research targeting human thought and behavior.

“Sadly, it’s long been established that our intelligence agencies, and those of our enemies, have sought to alter human consciousness and behavior, often without the subjects’ consent. The existence of MK-Ultra, the clandestine project into which Project Artichoke evolved, is well documented,” Wolf said.

John Leake, vice president of the McCullough Foundation and author of the forthcoming book, “Mind Viruses: America’s Irrational Obsessions,” said, “Researchers have long suspected that the Church Committee‘s revelation of the CIA’s notorious MK-Ultra mind control experiments, mostly using LSD, had the effect of obscuring the agency’s much larger Project Artichoke.”

Leake cited evidence suggesting that a 1951 mass poisoning in Pont-Saint-Esprit, France, in which 250 residents experienced severe hallucinations and seven people died, was a Project Artichoke experiment. The outbreak was officially attributed to contaminated bread from a local bakery.

Leake said the 1952 document is “consistent with the suspicion that the CIA was seeking to discover mind control methods for even large populations.”

In 2024, a Reuters investigation revealed that the CIA operated a secret propaganda campaign involving vaccines in the Philippines. The campaign attacked what the agency perceived as China’s “growing influence” in the country by targeting the Chinese-made Sinovac COVID-19 vaccine through the use of phony online accounts spreading “anti-vax” messaging.

Michael Rectenwald, Ph.D., author of “The Great Reset and the Struggle for Liberty: Unraveling the Global Agenda,” said the Project Artichoke revelations “make it clear that the CIA has posed an enormous threat to U.S. citizens, in addition to the horrors it unleashes on non-U.S. target governments and populations.”

Project Artichoke wanted to enlist help from Army’s Chemical Warfare Service

The 1952 Project Artichoke document also included a recommendation to involve the U.S. Army Chemical Warfare Service in the project’s efforts, citing its experience with “exhaustive studies along these lines.”

This proposal bears a resemblance to recent suggestions that COVID-19 — and the response to the pandemic — were coordinated at high levels of government, military and intelligence agencies.

Last year, former pharmaceutical research and development executive Sasha Latypova and retired science writer Debbie Lerman released the “Covid Dossier,” presenting evidence of the “military/intelligence coordination of the Covid biodefense response in the US, UK, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, Germany, and Italy.”

According to Latypova and Lerman, “Covid was not a public health event” but “a global operation, coordinated through public-private intelligence and military alliances and invoking laws designed for CBRN (chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear) weapons attacks.”

Leake said “it is far from clear” that the Church Committee hearings of 1975 “put a complete end to CIA covert programs.” He cited the possible laboratory development of the SARS-CoV-2 virus as an example.

“The laboratory creation of SARS-CoV-2 with gain-of-function techniques developed at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, and the U.S. military’s involvement in developing and distributing of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, should … be regarded as possible outgrowths or even continuations of Project Artichoke,” Leake said.

Experts question similarities between Project Artichoke, COVID vaccines

In a Substack post today, epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher drew a potential connection between Project Artichoke and the development of COVID-19 vaccines. Hulscher cited recent peer-reviewed studies that identified the vaccines’ adverse impact on neurological health and “surging rates of cognitive decline.”

Hulscher wrote:

“Disturbingly, since 2021, over 70% of humanity received a neurotoxic agent masquerading as a ‘vaccine.’ The same goals outlined in the CIA document (vaccines/drugs capable of covertly inducing anxiety, depression, and lethargy) are now being observed in COVID-19 vaccinated populations. …

“… If the CIA was secretly discussing covert methods to alter human behavior in the 1950s, it would be no surprise if similar classified projects emerged in the decades that followed.”

A 2024 paper published in the journal Molecular Psychiatry investigated psychiatric adverse events among over 2 million people in South Korea. The study found that “COVID-19 vaccination increased the risks of depression, anxiety, dissociative, stress-related, and somatoform disorders, and sleep disorders while reducing the risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.”

A 2025 study published in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science found “alarming safety signals regarding neuropsychiatric conditions following COVID-19 vaccination, compared to the influenza vaccinations and to all other vaccinations combined.”

This included increases in schizophrenia, depression, cognitive decline, delusions, violent behavior, suicidal thoughts and homicidal ideation.

“The fact that mRNA vaccines were designed to cross the blood-brain barrier and inflame the brain — or at least, they were known to do so, during their manufacture and distribution — should give us pause in light of this news,” Wolf said.

Wolf said the latest revelations, “while shocking, provide all the more reason for us to be critical of opaque, coercive or untested vaccination  programs, additives in food and water, and toxic or opaque geoengineering programs.”

Tapper said the revelations reinforce “the urgent need to protect individual liberty, medical freedom, and ethical boundaries in science and public health.”

“The lesson here is simple: vigilance is necessary when governments claim authority over the human body and mind,” Tapper said.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

For more:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-new-vaccine-injury-tracking-system-is-it-better-than-old-one/

FDA Unveils New Vaccine Injury Tracking System — Is It Any Better Than the Old One?

The FDA’s new Adverse Event Monitoring System for drugs and vaccines merges the agency’s previously separate adverse event reporting systems for drugs, vaccines and other products. Some critics told The Defender the new database does little to solve long-standing problems with the federal government’s follow-up and verification of adverse event reports.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.

broken vaccine bottles and words "adverse event"

The new platform merges the FDA’s previously separate adverse event reporting systems for drugs, vaccines and other products.

Some advocates for the vaccine-injured applauded the launch of the FDA Adverse Event Monitoring System (AEMS). But others said the new database does little to solve long-standing problems with the federal government’s follow-up and verification of adverse event reports.

The FDA said AEMS reports will be updated in real time, not quarterly.

“The FDA’s previous adverse event reporting systems were outdated and fragmented and made important data difficult to access,” FDA Commissioner Marty Makary said in a statement.

Makary described AEMS as “a single, intuitive adverse event platform that will better serve agency scientists, researchers, and the public.”

AEMS includes data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS); the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which contains reports for drugs, biologics, cosmetics and color additives; and the Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS), which contains reports for animal drugs and foods.

By May, AEMS will also include reports now housed in separate databases, concerning adverse events related to human foods and dietary supplements, tobacco products and medical devices. According to the FDA, these databases together processed 6 million adverse event reports per year.

AEMS will be backed by artificial intelligence (AI), according to Fox News.

Last month, Wired reported that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which oversees the FDA, was developing a generative AI tool to identify patterns in vaccine injury reports and “generate hypotheses on the negative effects of vaccines.”

Christopher Dreisbach, legal affairs director for React19, an advocacy group for COVID-19 vaccine injury victims, said AEMS “has the potential to be a meaningful step forward” if it replaces a “Kafkaesque status quo.”

Dreisbach was referring to vaccine injury reports submitted to VAERS that are “frequently dismissed on the grounds that VAERS is ‘unreliable.’”

He said that contradiction “has left injured individuals in an impossible position: told to trust a system that, when it raises questions, is then discounted.”

Karl Jablonowski, Ph.D., senior research scientist for Children’s Health Defense (CHD), questioned the new platform’s reliance on AI.

“Supplanting real intelligence with the artificial kind is always a cause for concern,” Jablonowski said. “Decisions made by humans are trackable, accountable and inquirable. With AI, it is not so easy to identify the genesis of decisions, and accountability doesn’t exist.”

VAERS long plagued by transparency concerns

During U.S. Senate confirmation hearings last year, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. promised “radical transparency” at federal health agencies. Soon after his confirmation, Kennedy pledged better vaccine injury tracking.

Makary said the FDA’s prior adverse event reporting systems “were outdated and fragmented and made important data difficult to access.”

“These clunky systems also wasted millions of taxpayer dollars and created blind spots in our postmarket surveillance of products ranging from drugs and vaccines to cosmetics,” he added.

According to the FDA, AEMS will save the agency approximately $120 million over the next five years.

VAERS has faced scrutiny over transparency concerns. A 2023 investigation by The BMJ revealed that the federal government operates two VAERS systems — one for the public, and a private back-end system that contains corrections and updates, including deaths that occurred after an initial injury.

The BMJ investigation also identified other deficiencies, including disappearing reports and data.

In 2024, React19 teamed with CHD and OpenVAERS — a website that provides tools for more easily accessing and searching VAERS data — to develop a tool to track VAERS reports.

Citing frequently disappearing reports and widespread errors in VAERS, the organizations said the new tool would enable vaccine-injured people to follow what happens to the reports they submit.

According to Albert Benavides, founder of VAERSaware.com, the FDA’s FAERS database had problems similar to those associated with VAERS. He said the new AEMS does little to address transparency concerns.

“This new AEMS dashboard has all the same functionality, or lack of functionality, as the old FAERS dashboard. It looks like FDA has rebranded FAERS to AEMS but added a couple extra tabs for vaccines and cosmetics,” Benavides said.

In previous interviews with CHD.TV, Benavides suggested that VAERS administrators intentionally undercounted or obscured data on vaccine-related injuries and deaths.

Old systems were difficult to use and inefficient — will AEMS be any better?

Fox News quoted unnamed FDA sources who said the next phase of the AEMS rollout will include a user-friendly front-end system “that makes it easy for reports to be submitted.”

The FDA cited estimates suggesting that 80% of reports were never entered into its databases “due to the complexity of filing a report.” A 2011 Harvard report found that less than 1% of all adverse events were reported to VAERS.

Dreisbach said, “Streamlining is only one piece of what is needed.” He added:

“The bigger issue is follow-up and verification. Right now, individuals who file legitimate adverse-event reports rarely receive meaningful follow-up, and clinicians often assume that reporting leads to some sort of investigation — when in reality, most reports simply become entries in a database.

“Fixing the front end without fixing the back end will not improve safety surveillance in a meaningful way.”

In a 2024 interview with The DefenderDr. Danice Hertz, a retired gastroenterologist injured by Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, said, “It took three years and 11 reports to VAERS for someone to contact me from the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and request my records.”

After submitting her 11th report in late 2023, Hertz said the CDC employee who spoke with her said the agency was “swamped with reports of injury.”

In a follow-up interview today, Hertz welcomed the launch of AEMS, but said reports to the new database “must be permanent and not mysteriously drop out as many reports have done in the old VAERS system.”

She added:

“Patients should be able to update their reports as their condition progresses and more information becomes available. This is not possible with the old systems. … Most importantly, if data is to be collected, the data must be taken seriously and acted upon. VAERS data was largely ignored.”

The lack of follow-up on reports submitted to VAERS was the subject of two 2024 U.S. House of Representatives hearings. At the second of the two hearings, in March 2024, witnesses told Congress that inadequate vaccine safety surveillance systems “jeopardized” Americans’ health during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout.

Jablonowski noted that a key adverse event database — Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — is not included within AEMS. He said:

“The VSD is a near-real-time monitoring of about 10 million people — children and adults — that contains data on vaccination, demographics, birth details, medical encounters (visits, diagnoses and lab results), pharmacy records and mortality.

“A publicly available version of the VSD would relieve an enormous burden, and budgetary line item, from HHS. A lot of good science can come from it, and it could bury the uncertainty surrounding hazards of vaccines.”

Design of new AEMS database raises concerns

Benavides said the structure and design of the new AEMS database fall short of the government’s promises of radical transparency. He said AEMS is missing the “free text narrative section” that was “customary in VAERS reports.”

This section displayed the text freely entered by anyone who submitted a VAERS report — text which Benavides said allowed the public to provide information not requested or captured by the other, closed-ended questions in the VAERS submission form.

Benavides said information entered in the free text section typically included “vaccine history, laboratory results, current illness and concomitant medications.”

Certain search options that were available within the VAERS database are also not available in AEMS, according to Benavides.

“In this AEMS data dashboard, there is no longer an adverse event level like ‘Office visit,’ ‘Emergency Room,’ ‘Hospitalization,’ ‘Life Threatening,’ ‘Permanent Disability’ or ‘Death,’” Benavides said.

He said the date of death — customarily included in most VAERS reports — is “non-existent” in the new platform. And the vaccine lot number information is “buried under an additional layer of clicks.”

“The public is only allowed to view the minimal amount of data, like age, gender, vaccination date, onset date, vaccine name,” Benavides said.

Benavides said that, as structured, AEMS will also hamper the efforts of researchers, as it limits the number of reports they can download at one time.

“Worst of all for any intermediate-to-expert user or analyst, queries and raw downloads are capped at no more than 10,000 records,” Benavides said.

Dr. Joel Wallskog, an orthopedic surgeon injured by COVID-19 vaccines and co-chair of React19, said medical providers and healthcare organizations must be required to submit adverse event reports to AEMS for the new platform to succeed.

“Reporting must be mandatory, and there must be a penalty for non-reporting. If all of these issues are not taken into account in a new reporting system, the new system will once again fail,” Wallskog said.

“Patients who experience adverse events want a system that works, not one that merely appears more modern,” Dreisbach said. He called for more transparency in how AEMS operates, greater accessibility for researchers, clinicians and the public, and “accountability in how reports are followed up and classified.”

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

http://

Feb 26, 2026
Clinical Strategies for Neuropsychiatric and Neurological Recovery
Join Dr. Aylin Ozdemir for an expert-led exploration of the neurological and neuropsychiatric complexities of Lyme disease and associated co-infections, based on a recently published peer-reviewed research paper (June 2025).
This webinar examines why Lyme disease is frequently misdiagnosed in patients presenting with cognitive, behavioural, and neurological symptoms, and how expanded diagnostic approaches can reveal underlying immune dysregulation and neuroinflammation when standard testing falls short.
Drawing from real-world clinical cases, viewers will learn about integrative therapeutic approaches to support neurological and neuropsychiatric recovery. We’ll explore practical strategies to better recognise, treat, and support recovery in complex neuro-Lyme presentations:
Why Lyme disease often presents as psychiatric or neurological illness The limitations of standard testing How expanded diagnostics improve detection Clinical insight: Real-world case examples Recognising complex neuropsychiatric presentations Integrative therapeutic approaches: Antimicrobial strategies Immune modulation Neuroprotective and mitochondrial support Long-term maintenance protocols to help reduce relapse Dr. Kunal Garg provides a brief overview of the application of CARE Guidelines, highlighting the importance of rigorous case documentation and high-quality publishing in advancing evidence-informed Lyme disease care.
For more:

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/12/1/209

Bartonella and Borrelia-Related Disease Presenting as a Neurological Condition Revealing the Need for Better Diagnostics

by Marna E. Ericson1, B. Robert Mozayeni1, Laurie Radovsky2 and Lynne T. Bemis3,*
1T Lab Inc., Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA
2Laurie Radovsky, M.D. LLC., St. Paul, MN 55102, USA
3Department of Biomedical Sciences, Medical School Duluth Campus, University of Minnesota, Duluth, MN 55812, USA
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 202412(1), 209; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010209
Submission received: 21 December 2023 / Revised: 16 January 2024 / Accepted: 18 January 2024 / Published: 19 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bartonella and Bartonellosis: New Advances and Further Challenges)

Abstract

The diagnostic tests available to identify vector-borne pathogens have major limitations. Clinicians must consider an assortment of often diverse symptoms to decide what pathogen or pathogens to suspect and test for. Even then, there are limitations to the currently available indirect detection methods, such as serology, or direct detection methods such as molecular tests with or without culture enrichment. Bartonella spp., which are considered stealth pathogens, are particularly difficult to detect and diagnose. We present a case report of a patient who experienced a spider bite followed by myalgia, lymphadenopathy, and trouble sleeping. She did not test positive for Bartonella spp. through clinically available testing. Her symptoms progressed and she was told she needed a double hip replacement. Prior to the surgery, her blood was submitted for novel molecular testing, where Bartonella spp. was confirmed, and a spirochete was also detected. Additional testing using novel methods over a period of five years found Bartonella henselae and Borrelia burgdorferi in her blood.
This patient’s case is an example of why new diagnostic methods for vector-borne pathogens are urgently needed and why new knowledge of the variable manifestations of Bartonellosis need to be provided to the medical community to inform and heighten their index of suspicion.
_____________
**Comment**
You will recognize Marna Ericson’s name as her son had a severe bartonella infection.  She managed to take advanced imaging techniques on samples and found Bartonella alive and well in tissues surrounding where a PIC line had been removed.  She has teamed up with other researchers investigating Bartonella.  We can be extremely thankful for their work.
For more:

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/new-bill-puts-us-state-department?

New Bill Puts U.S. State Department in Charge of Organizing Foreign Governments for Next Pandemic Vaccines and Drugs: H.R. 7879

U.S. government operatives are preparing and organizing the global vaccine and drug response for the next pandemic before the next pandemic has even occurred.

A new bill introduced earlier this week in Congress would require the United States Department of State to organize foreign governments and international institutions behind the development and commercialization of medical countermeasures for future pandemics.

Pandemic preparedness is normally managed by domestic health agencies, not the State Department, meaning the bill would place the United States Department of State at the center of organizing foreign governments around vaccines, drugs, and other countermeasures for the next pandemic.

The current Secretary of State is Marco Rubio, a former republican senator from Florida (funding).

The Secretary would have the highest level of authority over the international coordination described in the bill.

The new federal legislation, H.R. 7879, was introduced March 9 by California Representatives Mike Levin (D) (funding) and David G. Valadao (R) (funding) and referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Officials within the U.S. government are constructing the worldwide system for distributing pandemic vaccines and treatments before the next pandemic has even begun.  (See link for article and contact information if you wish to express your opposition to pandemic orchestration)

For more: