Gates Founded CEPI Seeks Billions For Next ‘Pandemic’ as WHO and World Bank Deploy $7 Billion Across 75 Nations

February 19, 2026

Remember Problem, Reaction, Solution?  Well, here it is in action.

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/bill-gatesfounded-cepi-seeks-25-billion?

Bill Gates–Founded CEPI Seeks $2.5 Billion for Next Pandemic as WHO and World Bank Deploy $7 Billion Across 75 Nations

Powerful international institutions funding pandemic-capable influenza research are now simultaneously building the global response system designed to confront those threats.
Jon Fleetwood
Feb 17, 2026

An unprecedented level of international funding and coordination is now underway to expand the global pandemic response system, with at least $9.5 billion committed by the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Bank, and a Bill Gates-founded vaccine coalition to finance the worldwide surveillance networks, laboratories, and vaccines tied to future pandemic declarations.

The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI)—founded in 2017 by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum, and national governments—announced last week that it is now seeking an additional $2.5 billion to expand its pandemic vaccine financing programs. (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

Journalist Jon Fleetwood asks a poignant question:

When Does Pandemic Conflict of Interest Become a National Security Threat?

Both Gates and the WHO financially benefit from ‘pandemics,’ with Gates being a top contributor to the WHO in a ‘you wash my back, I’ll wash yours,’ arrangement, as well as to biolabs performing ‘gain of function’ experiments. It’s a nice, cozy arrangement and financially lucrative to all involved, well, except for all the people who get sick and/or die.

A recent study was not able to produce one case of the flu despite prolonged close contact; however, a federally run experiment funded by NIAID, DARPA, Gates, and your tax dollars deliberately infected 80 Americans with an engineered flu virus and of the 74 analyzed, 53 became contagious. Oh, and ‘vaxxed’ shedders displayed a hyper-inflammatory immune response, ‘vaccination’ did not prevent infection, and no details were given whatsoever about biosafety controls, containment, or post infection release criteria.  

Have we learned anything yet?  Feeling safe?

Further, NIAID-funded researchers are engineering a mutant Bird flu virus to ‘expand its host range.’  Current Director of NIAID, Dr. Jeffery Taubenberger just happens to hold a patient on the Bird Flu pandemic ‘vaccine,’ which just happens to be at the center of Trump’s $500 Million ‘Generation Gold Standard‘ Project.  Taubenberger lead the team that sequenced and reconstructed the 1918 ‘Spanish flu’ genome – the deadliest pandemic in modern history.

Well, isn’t this all just nice and cozy?

I’m sure all of this is completely unrelated and kosher.

For more:

 

 

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Comments Off on Gates Founded CEPI Seeks Billions For Next ‘Pandemic’ as WHO and World Bank Deploy $7 Billion Across 75 Nations

ACTION: Block & Repeal Food Libel & Ag-Gag Laws

https://advocacy.organicconsumers.org/page/94199/action/1?  Go here to take action

Protect Food and Environmental Activists’ Right to Free Speech! Block & Repeal Food Libel & Ag-Gag Laws!

“Food Libel” and “Ag-Gag” laws are the corporations’ attempt to keep us from knowing where our food comes from and how it’s produced.

Food Libel laws let corporations take their critics to court, while Ag-Gag laws criminalize investigations into animal abuse at factory farms.

TAKE ACTION: Tell Your State Legislators to Protect Food and Environmental Activists’ Right to Free Speech! Block and Repeal Food Libel and Ag-Gag Laws!

In an alarming move, Florida is considering expanding its food libel law with a provision to broaden “food disparagement” restrictions. A victory for free speech was won last week when the Senate dropped the issue, but a House bill still includes it.

While Florida’s current law is limited to perishable food products like fruits and vegetables, the proposed changes seek to broaden the scope in two major ways:

  • The removal of “Perishable”—This expansion would include all agricultural products.
  • And addition of “Farm Practices”—The provision explicitly adds agricultural practices, such as fertilizer use and pesticide application.

This would allow powerful agricultural corporations like Bayer and Corteva to use a new legal weapon to target those who speak out publicly about farming practices, including pesticides, water pollution, and harmful health effects.

This expansion would heavily prioritize industry interests, making it perilous for individuals, organizations, and farmers to speak up about harmful practices and undermine efforts to create a safer, more transparent food system nationwide.

In a frightening example of how food libel laws like Florida’s can be misused, Apeel is currently using it to sue Robyn Openshaw, the Green Smoothie Girl, for her campaign to educate consumers about how to avoid its “edible” fruit and vegetable coating.

We need to act now!

If passed, Florida’s expanded food libel law would set a dangerous precedent, stifling free speech and silencing environmental and health advocates, while creating a food system that prioritizes industry interests over public health and safety.

TAKE ACTION: Tell Your State Legislators to Protect Food and Environmental Activists’ Right to Free Speech! Block and Repeal Food Libel and Ag-Gag Laws!

(Go to top link to take action)

For more:

 

Category:

Activism, diet and nutrition

Comments Off on ACTION: Block & Repeal Food Libel & Ag-Gag Laws

Action: End Liability Protection for ‘Vaccine’ Makers & CHD Seeks to Intervene in Vaccine Lawsuit

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/urge-your-federal-legislators-to-end-liability-protection-for-vaccine-makers

Urge Your Federal Legislators to End Liability Protection for Vaccine Makers

February 18, 2026

Take Action NowOn February 11, Senator Rand Paul introduced S. 3853, which will end the liability shield currently provided to vaccine manufacturers. A companion bill to Representative Paul Gosar’s H.R. 4668 to “End the Vaccine Carveout,” the legislation allows plaintiffs to choose whether to pursue civil action or seek compensation through the VICP, a choice they’ve been denied since 1986.

For decades, the system has favored pharmaceutical company profits over the rights of people, especially children, who have been injured or killed by vaccines. It’s time to focus on fairly compensating the individuals and families who have been devastated by adverse events following vaccination. Passage of these bills will finally level the playing field for families pursuing compensation.

This landmark legislation is long overdue, and according to a recent Fabrizio Ward poll, taking away the liability protection currently afforded vaccine makers is an enormously popular idea among Democrats, Republicans, and Independents.

Please use the form below to contact your federal Senators and Representatives and urge them to cosponsor this historic legislation.

Consider taking an additional step by calling the House Energy and Commerce Committee members to ask that they give H.R. 4668 a hearing. Start with those in your state first and call others if you have the time. It’s ok to call after hours and leave a message.

____________

Please keep in mind:

  • Pfizer offered millions in bribes & monthly wages to buy the silence of outspoken doctors critical against the clot shots.
  • allegedly, Pfizer gave $11M to Canadian officials during COVID. Millions were funneled to “Potentially Influential Government Officials,” or PIGOs. According to a lawsuit, this activity violated foreign corruption laws.
  • historically, doctors have received monetary kickbacks for pushing ‘vaccines’ upon their patients at Wellness Visits. causing the outright deaths of many infants.
  • CDC data shows MMR & MMRV linked to 2,657% more U.S. deaths than measles infection since 1995 and a study shows that when classification succeeds, 90.91% of cases are caused by the vaccine itself.
    • It’s important to note that the CDC obfuscates vaccine data is by classifying 95% of measles cases as ‘unvaccinated or unknown’– two fundamentally different categories.The agency purposely merges unknown cases with unvaccinated ones maximizing the association between measles cases and non-vaccination while obscuring uncertainty in the data.  It purposely does not apply the same logic in reverse – merging ‘unknown cases with vaccinated cases maximizing the association between measles cases and vaccination, which very well could be true.

….the cesspool is very deep indeed and the ‘vaccine’ religion is finally being questioned

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/childrens-health-defense-seeks-to-intervene-vaccine-lawsuit-aap-hhs

Breaking: Children’s Health Defense Seeks to Intervene in High-Stakes Vaccine Lawsuit

In an emergency motion filed Wednesday, Children’s Health Defense and a group of parents and doctors asked a Massachusetts federal court to allow them to intervene in a lawsuit challenging recent changes to the CDC childhood vaccine schedule. “Nobody in the room is speaking for the children who were injured or killed under the schedule,” said attorney Rick Jaffe.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.
February 19, 2026
vaccine bottles with gavel on book

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) is asking to join in a high-stakes court battle between the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

In an emergency motion filed Wednesday, CHD asked a Massachusetts federal court to join as a defendant, along with Kennedy and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), in a suit filed by the AAP and other medical groups against Kennedy and HHS.

The AAP lawsuit seeks to block recent changes HHS made to the childhood vaccine schedule and other vaccine-related policies.

Attorney Rick Jaffe and Massachusetts attorney Robert N. Meltzer filed the motion to intervene in the case.

Jaffe represents CHD and five other plaintiffs in a separate lawsuit against the AAP. That suit accuses the AAP of running a decades-long racketeering scheme to defraud American families about the safety of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) vaccine schedule.

Jaffe said the AAP and HHS are litigating whether the government has the authority to revise the schedule — but neither side is addressing the more fundamental issue at stake: the safety of the former childhood schedule.

“I filed this intervention because the court is about to rule on restoring a vaccination schedule without hearing from a single family affected by it,” Jaffe said.

Jaffe told The Defender:

“You have seven trade organizations on one side and government lawyers on the other, and nobody in the room speaking for the children who were injured or killed under the schedule the plaintiffs want back.

“Andrea Shaw lost twin sons. Shanticia Nelson lost her daughter. The court should know their names before it rules.”

Shaw and Nelson are parents whose children died after receiving vaccines routinely recommended by the CDC. They, along with two pediatricians, are co-plaintiffs with CHD in the lawsuit against the AAP.

CHD General Counsel Kim Mack Rosenberg said the motion to intervene in the AAP’s lawsuit against HHS also raises new claims. CHD alleges that because many states have taken up AAP’s vaccine recommendations, the AAP has effectively become a state actor.

“As a state actor, AAP violates the First Amendment by tamping down doctors’ speech and by depriving listeners — like the parent intervenors here — of a variety of opinions to assist in making an informed choice,” Mack Rosenberg said.

Missing evidence: childhood schedule never proven safe

(See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

I’ve said this before, but it bares repeating: everyone loves the science when it agrees with their stance.  In the case of ‘vaccines,’ there’s a lot of missing science, namely:

  • a true placebo controlled trial AND the
  • the long term effects of ‘vaccines,’
  • the cumulative effect of all the ‘vaccines’ together

The fact these foundational issues have not even been researched shows how tainted the entire paradigm actually is.  The fact people refuse to see and admit these facts demonstrate perfectly that it’s a ‘vaccine’ religion based upon pseudo-science and even no science at all in some cases.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Comments Off on Action: End Liability Protection for ‘Vaccine’ Makers & CHD Seeks to Intervene in Vaccine Lawsuit

Coinfection in Lyme Disease: Clinical Impact, Diagnostic Challenges, and Therapeutic Perspectives

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/14/2/325

Tick-Borne Co-Infection in Lyme Disease: Clinical Impact, Diagnostic Challenges, and Therapeutic Perspectives

by Georgi Popov, Dzhaner Bashchobanov* and Radina Andonova
Clinic of Infectious Diseases, Sofiamed Hospital, 1797 Sofia, Bulgaria
*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2026, 14(2), 325; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14020325
Submission received: 8 January 2026 / Revised: 27 January 2026 / Accepted: 28 January 2026 / Published: 30 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Perspectives in Lyme Disease: Microbial Interactions, Host Responses, and Therapeutic Innovations)
Abstract
Tick-borne co-infections are an increasingly recognized and clinically important aspect of Lyme borreliosis, particularly in regions where Ixodes ticks transmit a wide range of bacterial, protozoan, and viral pathogens. In addition to Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, these ticks frequently harbor microorganisms such as Babesia spp.,   Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Ehrlichia spp., Borrelia miyamotoi, Bartonella spp., and several tick-borne viruses. Co-infections may increase disease severity, prolong symptom duration, and contribute to atypical or overlapping clinical presentations, thereby complicating diagnosis and management. Growing evidence from epidemiological studies, clinical case series, and experimental in vivo and in vitro models indicates that pathogen–pathogen and pathogen–host interactions can modulate immune responses and influence disease progression. Diagnostic challenges arise from non-specific clinical features and limitations of current laboratory methods. From a therapeutic perspective, although standard antibiotic regimens for Lyme disease are effective against some bacterial co-infections, they do not provide coverage for protozoan or viral agents, necessitating pathogen-specific and, in some cases, combination treatment strategies. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the epidemiology, clinical impact, diagnostic limitations, and treatment approaches for tick-borne co-infections associated with Lyme disease, and highlights critical evidence gaps and future research directions to improve patient outcomes.
For more:

Category:

Anaplasmosis, Babesia, Bartonella, Borrelia Miyamotoi (Relapsing Fever Group), Ehrlichiosis, Lyme, research, Viruses

Comments Off on Coinfection in Lyme Disease: Clinical Impact, Diagnostic Challenges, and Therapeutic Perspectives

The BMJ and Commonwealth Fund: All Hat, No Cattle?

February 17, 2026

Before reading the following article, read this first.  It’s crucial to understand that Gates and Farrar had their hands all over everything related to COVID – including but not limited to the research being done and the global messaging about it.

The BMJ writes about how the Wellcome Trust’s investments overlap with its research efforts.  At the very bottom of the page it also lists the competing interests and that the BMJ publishes work by research groups and academics funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust.

So there’s that……read on….

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/the-bmj-public-health-commonwealth-fund-debate-mary-holland-rapid-response/?

The BMJ and Commonwealth Fund: All Hat, No Cattle?

On Jan. 29, The BMJ published an op-ed by Lucinda Hiam of the Commonwealth Fund: “Public health must bridge the divide with groups who mistrust science.” Using the online “Rapid Response” form provided by The BMJ, I replied to Ms. Hiam’s call to “bridge the divide.” I said I agreed and invited her to engage with CHD. We have received no response from her, and The BMJ has not published our response.

by Mary Holland, J.D.
February 9, 2026

On Jan. 29, The BMJ published an op-ed by Lucinda Hiam of the Commonwealth Fund. The op-ed — “Public health must bridge the divide with groups who mistrust science” — specifically referenced Children’s Health Defense (CHD).

Using the online “Rapid Response” form provided by The BMJ, I replied to Ms. Hiam’s call to “bridge the divide.” I said I agreed and invited her to engage with CHD.

In my response, submitted Feb. 3, I wrote:

“Let’s have an adult conversation about science, vaccination, informed consent, vaccine injury, and civil rights. I invite Ms. Hiam to engage in a public dialogue on CHD’s public platform CHD.TV, or anywhere else, to debate these critical issues.”

Despite Ms. Hiam’s stated goal to “bridge the divide,” we have received no response from her, and The BMJ has not published our “Rapid Response” to her op-ed.

As a result, The BMJ and the Commonwealth Fund have only driven the divide deeper — by failing even to afford the courtesy of a reply.  (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

And this is where ‘science’ stands…..in a vice-grip of investors who are running the show.

Those without an agenda are willing to debate those with differing opinions.  Remaining silent shows propaganda politics, not science.

Examples:

By contrast, U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has agreed for years to debate anyone on vaccines.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Comments Off on The BMJ and Commonwealth Fund: All Hat, No Cattle?