https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/who-convenes-global-session-to-dictate?

WHO Convenes Global Session to Dictate How the Coming Influenza Pandemic Will Be Run

Foreign pandemic governance cartel is “[p]reparing for and responding to an influenza pandemic.”

World Health Organization Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in Kuwait City, Kuwait on July 28, 2021 (State Department photo by Ron Przysucha/ Public Domain/Wikimedia Commons).

The World Health Organization will convene an online international pandemic control session on Wednesday, March 18, centered on the unelected globalist group’s Pandemic Influenza Preparedness (PIP) Framework, according to a WHO press release.

PIP is the international structure through which the WHO, a foreign syndicate, dictates how influenza virus samples are transferred worldwide, and how pandemic vaccines, antivirals, and diagnostics are allocated once an influenza pandemic response is activated.

The new pandemic control session, organized through the WHO’s Epidemics and Pandemics Information Network (EPI-WIN), will decree how governments, laboratories participating in the WHO influenza surveillance network, and pharmaceutical manufacturers operate under the framework during an influenza pandemic response.

The United States is still participating in WHO pandemic surveillance networks (here)—including the organization’s CoViNet sentinel surveillance system, which now spans 45 reference laboratories worldwide—through institutions such as Emory University, Ohio State University, and the CDC, despite President Donald Trump’s executive order publicly withdrawing the country from the organization earlier this year.  (See link for article)

______________

Important quote:

With the WHO now activating its influenza pandemic command framework, the infrastructure that governed the COVID-19 response is already being positioned to run the next pandemic cycle.

For more:

Originally, the flu vaccine was a measure to protect the elderly, but go here for a blast from the past when four scientists researching the Flu vaccine during the 1960s found it to be ineffective and refused to give it to their own families.  The scientists state they were prevented from publishing their negative findings.

Despite this, the ineffective and dangerous vaccine has increasingly been pushed on everyone 6 months old and up, including pregnant women despite the fact the flu vaccine is linked to increased risk of miscarriage.

Now a recent Japanese study shows NO BENEFIT on hard outcomes: hospitalization and death. Another perfect example of how the massive push to vaccinate people for the flu has been a waste of time and effort.  Do not expect to read about this in the news.

Further demonstrating the diabolical history behind vaccines, the military mandated the Adenovirus vaccine for ‘cold-like symptoms’:

”…when it was shown that the vaccine contained a contaminant which caused cancer in laboratory animals, it was taken off the market, but that was 3 years after the division’s scientists have pointed out the danger…”

The Adenovirus vaccine (which contains live adenovirus Type 4 and type 7 can be shed in stool and and breast milk and infect contacts – particularly children, pregnant women, and those with immune system problems, as well as harming the unborn) is still available for United States military personnel.  It is not available to the general public.

 

 

 

 

https://sayerji.substack.com/p/the-dnc-called-it-a-chemtrail-conspiracy?

Politicians Called It a ‘Chemtrail Conspiracy.’ The CIA’s Own Files Just Proved Them Wrong.

From WikiLeaks mockery to Daily Mail headlines and RFK Jr.’s podium — the arc of vindication is complete.
Conspiracy theorists have claimed that airliners have been pouring various chemicals into the atmosphere for years for nefarious reasons including population control and mind control

“CIA accused of ‘poisoning the sky’ with toxins as files expose secret weather control agenda”

The Daily Mail: declassified 1965 documents reveal federal funding for weather modification was set to quadruple by 1967 — the same year the U.S. began seeding clouds over the Ho Chi Minh Trail. President Johnson’s personal letter praising the program is part of the same 18-page report now making global headlines.

Today, one of the most-read news outlets on earth put on its front page what independent researchers, concerned citizens, and this publication have been documenting for over a decade: the United States government ran covert atmospheric modification programs, used toxic compounds including lead iodide as a weapon of warand had the personal blessing of a sitting president to do it.

The CIA files are not new. They were quietly declassified in 2003. What is new is that the mainstream media can no longer afford to pretend they do not exist.

But before I explain why today matters, I need to take you back to a document far fewer people know about — one that reveals exactly why this information was suppressed for so long, and exactly who was doing the suppressing(See link for article)

____________

Important excerpt:

The 18-page CIA report making global headlines today has been in the public record since 2003. What it reveals is not speculation. It is the operational history of the United States government’s own atmospheric modification programs, in their own words.

“He who controls the weather will control the world.”

— Lyndon B. Johnson, commencement address, Southwest Texas State University, May 1962

Mar 17, 2026

The Daily Mail runs the CIA weather modification files as front-page news. The same documents independent researchers cited for a decade are now mainstream headlines. The decade-long suppression strategy has collapsed.

Go here to stop taxpayer funding for dangerous atmospheric geoengineering

For more:

http://

Understanding Tick-Borne Disease Testing in 2026

IGeneX Inc.

Tick-borne diseases continue to be among the most complex and misunderstood conditions in modern medicine. As the landscape of diagnostics evolves rapidly, clinicians and healthcare professionals face increasing challenges—and opportunities—in accurately identifying infections, co-infections, and immune responses that directly impact patient outcomes.
 
In this forward-looking IGeneX webinar, learn how advances in laboratory science, expanded pathogen detection, and improved testing methodologies are reshaping the way tick-borne diseases are evaluated and managed. Attendees will gain a clear, practical understanding of how modern diagnostics are addressing longstanding limitations in sensitivity, specificity, and clinical interpretation.
 
This session will examine:
  • The current and emerging challenges in tick-borne disease testing, including evolving pathogens, regional variability, and complex clinical presentations
  • Advances in diagnostic technologies, such as enhanced immunoblots, cellular immune assays, and expanded multi-species detection
  • How testing has evolved beyond single-pathogen models to better identify co-infections and immune dysfunction
  • The role of clinical context in test interpretation, and how modern diagnostics support more informed decision-making
  • What to expect in 2026 and beyond, including trends in test development, regulatory considerations, and data-driven diagnostics

Designed for physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and other healthcare professionals involved in diagnosing and managing tick-borne diseases, this webinar bridges the gap between laboratory innovation and real-world clinical practice. Whether you are new to advanced tick-borne testing or looking to stay ahead of emerging diagnostic trends, this session will provide actionable insights to support more confident testing strategies and improved patient care.

For more:

 

https://www.newsweek.com/us-northeast-warned-rise-multiple-disease-bearing-ticks

Scientists Issue Warning Over Rise of Ticks Carrying Multiple Diseases

By 

Ticks capable of carrying and transmitting more than one potentially fatal disease at the same time are becoming increasingly common in the northeastern U.S., according to a new long-term analysis that raises fresh public health concerns for the region.

The research found that a growing share of blacklegged ticks—also known as deer ticks—are infected with multiple disease-causing pathogens. The study was led by Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies disease ecologist Shannon LaDeau and conducted in partnership with the SUNY Center for Vector-Borne Diseases at Upstate Medical University.

The findings come from nearly a decade of tick surveillance and point to a more complex and potentially dangerous tick-borne disease landscape, particularly because different infections require different treatments.

“Healthcare workers should be on the lookout for rising co-infection risks,” LaDeau said in a statement. “And for people spending time outdoors in the Northeast, as a general rule, if the ground is not freezing, it’s a good idea to take precautions to avoid tick bites. Prevention is key.”  (See link for article)

_____________

Findings:

  • 1 in10 nymphs tested positive for at least two pathogens: Borrelia burgdorferi (19.3%) and Babesia microti (21%) were the most common followed by Anaplasma phagocytophilum (5.8%) and Borrelia miyamotoi (2%)
  • by the end of the study period 11% of sampled ticks had coinfections
  • coinfection rate has been increasing over time
  • 38% of nymphs were capable of transmitting at least one disease to humans

For more:

 

https://medicaldetective.substack.com/p/why-should-we-care-if-borrelia-the-agent-of-lyme-disease-was-bioengineered

Why Should We Care if Borrelia, The Agent of Lyme Disease, Was Bioengineered?

Article Excerpts:

Would Diagnostics and Treatments Change if Lyme Was Bioengineered?

Yes. Here’s how diagnostics and treatment would likely change in this day and age if the GAO report were to conclude that Lyme disease was bioengineered:

1. The Shift in Diagnostics: From “Indirect” to “Direct”: Currently, most Lyme tests look for antibodies (your body’s reaction), which can take weeks to appear and often stay positive even after the infection is gone. If the bacteria were bioengineered, the focus would shift immediately to identifying its specific genetic “fingerprint.” Next-Gen Sequencing (NGS) could be done in laboratories, sequencing the entire genome of the bacteria found in a chronically ill patient. If the GAO find specific “inserts” or genetic modifications, doctors could use CRISPR-based diagnostic tools to detect those exact artificial sequences with 100% certainty.

  • Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR): As seen in 2025/2026 research, we are already moving towards ddPCR, which can detect as few as 5 to 10 bacterial cells in the sample. Confirmation of a lab origin would likely fast-track FDA approval for these “direct detection” tests to ensure no bioengineered strain is missed.

2. Treatment: Targeted and Combination Therapies:

If a pathogen is bioengineered, there is a risk that it was designed to be a “persistent” or resistant to standard single drug protocols. When I worked at HHS on the 1st round of the HHS Tickborne Working Group, I asked for research monies to be provided to look at both accuracy of diagnostics and proof of persistence. I was told that each question would cost approximately $250,000. My request was denied. Was this part of a cover-up, since these were such important questions to have answered without costing a lot of money vis-à-vis the general NIH budget? Here is a link which I recently received from Carl Tuttle, who frequently puts out information on the dysfunctional medical politics of Lyme.

Evidence of Persistence of Lyme

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/59vfqec535blhfrs34dxa/700-articles-LYME-EvidenceofPersistence-V2.pdf?rlkey=c4qokt5dxhfssj9tjxqfxhoi9&e=1&dl=0

Would such extensive science finally be accepted by mainstream scientists as true if it were proven without a shadow of a doubt that Lyme was bioengineered? In other fields, we might not need such extensive science to prove what all of us know who have been in clinical practice for 4+ decades.

Research Funding Would Want To Improve on Lyme Disease Treatments

If the GAO report identifies specific genes added to enhance survival, then based on current 2026 research into “persister” cells, we might finally see the official adoption of multiple-drug protocols like dapsone combination therapy, which has been published to be highly effective against the biofilm/persister forms of Borrelia burgdorferi. You can see more about the studies and look at the documentaries and podcasts I did on my website, under consultations (I am providing this link to give information, not get more work. I promise!):   https://cangetbetter.com/consulting-services/

(See link for excellent article and many important facts patients need to know including the fact Dr. Horowitz was turned down for a grant):

 ….to design a multicenter, placebo-controlled, randomized study (the gold standard in medicine) to prove that Lyme was a persistent infection and that all 16 MSIDS factors can drive inflammation and subsequent clinical manifestations.

It would appear that once again our public ‘health’ authorities simply don’t want to uncover answers to the Lyme/MSIDS crisis.