https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/the-great-prostate-hoax

The Great Prostate Hoax

By Richard Ablin and Ronald Piana – Unbekoming Book Summary

Unbekoming

Oct 16, 2024

An expressive oil painting focused on the human prostate and its surgical removal, symbolizing the impact of PSA testing and prostate cancer treatment. The central image is a detailed representation of the prostate surrounded by surgical tools and hands preparing to perform the removal. The prostate is depicted with vulnerable, soft textures, while the background is dark and somber, with muted tones of blue, grey, and red, emphasizing the gravity of the procedure. Bold, dramatic brushstrokes highlight the intensity and emotional weight of the scene, evoking a sense of medical intervention and loss.

It’s not just women that Cartel Medicine feeds on, although it does prefer them.

Men are also meat for the grinder, especially when their privates are involved.

The screening hoax we witnessed with mammograms has a counterpart with prostates and the PSA test.

The predation here is especially synergistic as the maiming and destruction caused by prostate interventions feed two sub-Cartels: those of erectile dysfunction and incontinence. The adult diaper business is thriving because of this butchery.

Urologists, not wanting to be left behind by pediatricianspsychiatristscardiologistsdermatologists and  dentists have their own cozy racket.

With thanks to Richard Ablin and Ronald Piana for telling the truth. [in their book ‘The Great Prostate Hoax.’]

12-point summary

Here’s a 12-point summary of the book, including key data and statistics for those that don’t want to read the longer Q&A below.

  1. PSA (Prostate-Specific Antigen) is not cancer-specific. It’s present in normal, benign, and cancerous prostate tissue. There is no specific PSA level that definitively indicates cancer.
  2. Routine PSA screening leads to significant overdiagnosis and overtreatment. For every 1,000 men screened, only 1 man may avoid death from prostate cancer, while many others suffer unnecessary biopsies and treatments.
  3. Prostate cancer is age-related. About 40% of men aged 40-49, 70% of men 60-69, and 80% of men over 70 have prostate cancer. Most of these cancers are slow-growing and unlikely to cause death.
  4. The lifetime risk of dying from prostate cancer is only 3%, meaning 97% of men will die from other causes, even if they have prostate cancer.
  5. Radical prostatectomy, a common treatment resulting from PSA screening, often leads to significant side effects. Up to 60-80% of men experience erectile dysfunction and 10-20% have long-term urinary incontinence.
  6. PSA screening has not significantly reduced prostate cancer mortality. Studies show similar death rates between screened and unscreened populations.
  7. The PSA test has a high false-positive rate of up to 80%, leading to many unnecessary biopsies and treatments.
  8. Active surveillance is increasingly recognized as an appropriate option for many men with low-risk prostate cancer, potentially avoiding unnecessary treatments and their side effects.
  9. The U.S. healthcare system spends an estimated $3 billion annually on PSA tests alone, with billions more on subsequent procedures and treatments.
  10. New technologies like robotic surgery and proton beam therapy, while heavily marketed, have not shown superior outcomes to traditional treatments but are significantly more expensive.
  11. Conflicts of interest are prevalent in prostate cancer care. Many researchers and physicians promoting PSA screening have financial ties to companies that profit from increased screening and treatment.
  12. The FDA approved the PSA test for screening in 1994 despite significant reservations from its own advisory panel. This decision, along with aggressive marketing by medical companies, led to widespread adoption of PSA screening before its benefits and harms were fully understood.

(See link for article)

June 2, 2026

Tech entrepreneur Steve Kirsch used advanced AI to analyze raw, independent datasets about mRNA injuries – and uncovered what “no public health official wants to know.” Legacy media continues to ignore the staggering reality of adverse reactions and side effects of mRNA for COVID-19. Steve Kirsch took matters into his own hands – and his latest analysis estimates that as many as 2 million Americans were seriously disabled by the shots. He joins Dr. Kelly Victory to share his methods, how he used AI to analyze the data, and why “not a single national public-health authority, anywhere in the world, has produced an estimate of the type we just constructed.”

CHAPTERS

0:00 – Dr. Kelly Victory & Steve Kirsch: Exposing mRNA Data

5:30 – How Steve Kirsch Used AI To Analyze mRNA Injuries

18:15 – Steve Kirsch Offered $3.3 Million To Debate The Science, Nobody Took It

24:40 – “Scared Of Losing”: Why They Refuse To Debate Kirsch’s data

38:20 – Breaking Down The 55x Higher Risk Data

55:00 – The Missing Demographic: Where Are The 60-Year-Olds With These Conditions?

1:04:15 – How We Take Back The Public Health Bureaucracy

/www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-senate-investigation-finds-f15

BREAKING: Senate Investigation Finds FDA Officials Covered-Up 25 COVID Shot Safety Signals

FDA’s own data flagged sudden cardiac death, heart attacks, blood clots, neurological damage, and dementia… and the FDA analyst uncovering it was ordered to “cease and desist.”

Apr 29, 2026

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A new Majority Staff Interim Report from Sen. Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations was released today (April 29, 2026), titled Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals.

Even after Dr. Szarfman and DuMouchel published their findings in Drug Safety (2022) showing masking was eight times more likely with COVID vaccines, and Dr. Robert Califf replied “Thanks. These are good,” no changes were made to the methodology.

This is documented, internal FDA communication showing deliberate suppression of safety signals at the exact moment millions of Americans were being told the shots were “safe and effective.” (See link for article)

https://www.morgellonssurvey.org/ginger-savely-take-charge-of-your-health-lyme-morgellons/

Dr. Ginger Savely Joins Take Charge of Your Health to Discuss Lyme Disease, Morgellons, and the Patients Still Fighting to Be Heard

May 30, 2026 by Jeremy Murphree

Dr. Ginger Savely recently joined Take Charge of Your Health with Corinne and Carol for an important conversation about Lyme disease, chronic illness, and the misunderstood patients who continue searching for answers.

For the Morgellons community, this interview matters.

Dr. Savely has been one of the most visible and consistent clinicians willing to take Morgellons patients seriously. Long before the condition had any meaningful public recognition, she was listening to patients, examining lesions, documenting fibers, publishing clinical observations, and challenging the assumption that every patient reporting fibers, crawling sensations, or non-healing skin lesions must be suffering from a psychiatric disorder.

As a Morgellons patient advocate, I believe this type of public conversation is essential. Patients do not need more ridicule. They need careful evaluation, better science, better diagnostics, and clinicians willing to look before they dismiss.

(See link above for entire article)

Approximately 1 Hour

For more:

https://sayerji.substack.com/p/the-mammography-deception-why-rfk?

The Mammography Deception: Why RFK Jr. Is Right for the Wrong Reasons

How a screening tool became a political battleground — and why the real crisis in breast cancer care has nothing to do with who sits on a government task force

Sayer Ji

May 23, 2026

In May 2026, RFK Jr. fired two vice chairs of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) — the body whose letter grades legally determine what preventive care your insurance must cover — and the medical establishment and its media apparatus erupted in performative outrage. The concern was presented to the public in the following terms: that political operatives would replace evidence-based scientists, that mammograms and colonoscopies would go the way of vaccine recommendations. But in the ensuing media storm, almost no one stopped to ask a harder question. What if the evidence base for mammography screening was already contested, complicated, and in some dimensions, quietly devastating — long before any politician arrived to interfere?

“Doctors are furious that RFK Jr. touched mammography.

But the Cochrane Collaboration — medicine’s gold standard — found that for every woman mammography saves, 10 are unnecessarily treated.

The outrage is real. It’s just aimed in exactly the wrong direction.” Sayer Ji Source

(See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

1.3 MILLION women are over-diagnosed by mammography screening over a 30 year period and treated for cancers that would never have caused symptoms or death according to a 2012 analysis.

Let that sink in for a moment.

Ji points out that ‘finding is not the same thing as saving,’ and that for a majority of women their body’s immune system is managing this cluster of abnormal cells which would never cause symptoms, spread, or kill them. But today a ‘breast cancer’ diagnosis results in the institutional logic of oncology which demands biopsy, surgery, radiation, and often years of hormone suppression. Similarly to weather modifying geoengineering creating a self-fulfilling prophecy and then turning around and blaming ‘climate change’ for what it actually caused, these diagnosed women with ”breast cancer’ are told mammograms saved them and the system counts her a success despite never addressing the abnormal cell population.

Lastly, the fourth most common breast cancer in women is ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) which is abnormal cells within the milk duct – not invasive cancer. It is merely a finding of a tissue-level change yet standard care for it has been lumpectomy or mastectomy, followed by radiation, and often years of tamoxifen. RCTs are showing the majority of low and intermediate-grade DCIS do not progress to invasive cancer.

Never forget: mammography delivers ionizing radiation to breast tissue.

This accumulates with each mammogram.

Also, the entire breast cancer awareness month was co-founded by Imperial Chemical Industries – a manufacturer of carcinogens! who profits from every mammogram! See: “Stop Pinkwashing: The Truth Breast Cancer Charities Bury,” and “The Cancer Deception: How Modern Medicine’s Fundamental Misunderstanding of Cancer’s True Causes Created a $43 BILLION Overdiagnosis Industry.”

Ji points out the drivers of breast cancer which include diet and endocrine disrupting chemicals. (See top link for article)

_______________

For more:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/community/emr-syndrome-i-have-lost-my-career-my-hair-and-my-voice/

EMR Syndrome: ‘I Have Lost My Career, My Hair and My Voice’

Since smart meters were installed in her condo complex in 2018, Diane Grossi says her life has been steadily taken apart by symptoms she believes are linked to ongoing electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure. What began within weeks of installation has, over the past five years, evolved into a steady physical decline.

by Ann Tomoko Rosen

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.

woman holding her head in pain and wireless radiation symbol

Diane Grossi sounds like she’s been crying when she answers the phone.

“This is my radiation voice,” she says quietly. “I used to have a beautiful voice, but now that’s gone too.”

Since smart meters were installed in her condo complex in 2018, Diane says her life has been steadily taken apart by symptoms she believes are linked to ongoing electromagnetic radiation (EMR) exposure.

What began within weeks of installation has, over the past five years, evolved into a constant state of physical decline.

Diane describes a long list of debilitating symptoms: anxiety, migraines, nosebleeds, hair loss, rashes, nausea, tinnitus, tooth grinding, loss of balance, body aches and profound weakness.

But for Diane, the most devastating losses are the ones that cannot be measured clinically: her career, her independence and her ability to function in daily life.

“Since August 2018, I have lost my career, my hair and my voice,” she says. “My hands are numb so I can’t type and I can’t work. It feels like the radiation paralyzes you. You just can’t function.”

Despite refusing a smart meter for her own unit, Diane says she is surrounded on all sides by wireless infrastructure, including electric, gas and water meters installed throughout her building.

She estimates that multiple clusters of meters are located just feet and sometimes dozens of feet from her living space, creating what she experiences as constant exposure.

“I have not slept in my bedroom since the meters were installed,” she explains. “What little sleep I get is on the couch. My heart races. My body goes numb. My eyes burn. Sometimes I wake up and vomit. It’s like being tortured 24/7.”

Diane says she has repeatedly raised concerns with her HOA, providing documentation and scientific literature she believes support a connection between EMR exposure and her symptoms.

She also worries about safety risks in the building itself, including fire concerns and insurance exclusions tied to the infrastructure changes. But she says her concerns have gone unanswered.

“When I explained about insurance exclusions … crickets,” she says.

Unable to work, Diane has been surviving on a modest inheritance left after her mother’s passing in 2017. That financial cushion is now gone, leaving her in debt for the first time in her life.

She faces a painful contradiction: She cannot remain in her home due to her symptoms, but she also cannot afford to leave, pursue legal action or access disability support.

“I can’t get disability because they don’t acknowledge electrosensitivity,” also known as EMR Syndrome, she says. “I can’t even get diagnosed.”

Diane’s experience is not isolated. A growing number of people worldwide report similar symptoms they associate with electromagnetic fields from wireless infrastructure.

While mainstream regulatory agencies maintain that current evidence does not establish a causal link, the lived experiences of those affected continue to raise difficult questions about recognition, research gaps and public health protections.

For Diane, however, the debate is not abstract. It is lived every day in pain, exhaustion and isolation.

“I just can’t understand how this can happen,” she said. “We have laws to protect people. We have responsibilities to keep environments safe. But none of that seems to matter when it comes to this.”

Her story highlights a broader tension between technological expansion and human impact — between what is considered “safe” in policy frameworks and what individuals are experiencing in their homes and bodies.

And yet, despite everything she has lost, Diane continues to speak out not because she has answers, but because she believes the questions are not being asked.

Diane encourages others not to let the “experts” or regular authorities connect the dots of this complex situation. She’s one of many thousands of people who recognize their symptoms of EMR Syndrome. But we are all affected by the electrosmog around us.

Diane is sharing her story so that you and your loved ones never have to have a story of your own. That’s her wish for you. Let’s do what we can to make it come true.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Call to Action

This month, join our EMR Syndrome Awareness Campaign to help give a voice to those who are suffering and too often unheard. Share our Myth vs. Fact campaign, use our educational resources on the 704 No More website and help educate your community.

Together, we can raise awareness, challenge misinformation and build a stronger movement for accountability and recognition. Join us and take action.

Do you have a story you’d like to share with the CHD Community? Click here for details.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.