https://www.lymedisease.org/diagnosis-changed-everything/

“D-Day” and the diagnosis that changed everything

Oct. 21, 2026

By Darlene DiBara O’Connor

A door closed. Then another swung wide open.

Wait.What?

You mean I might not really have ALS? I am not going to die a slow, painful death in my forties? And will still be here to raise my two young sons?

So, wait. Even after seeing 22+ practitioners, undergoing dozens of diagnostic procedures, and having numerous negative Lyme disease tests, I could still have it?

And it could be what is killing me right now?

These were the frantic questions, fraught with confusion and exhausting emotions that swirled in my brain or out of my mouth in that doctor’s office on October 16, 2013. The day after my mother’s funeral. That day that changed the course of my life–and my family’s lives–forever.

That day was what I now call my D-Day. The day that I was finally, properly diagnosed and then, successfully treated, by a brilliant and caring doctor from Connecticut. That visit saved my life, my sons’ lives, and many others in our family and beyond. This altered the course of my life. Forever.

Earlier that week, in the middle of the night, I bellowed the most guttural sobs while I prayed, on my hands and knees on my cold, kitchen floor. I vowed out loud to God, my dying mother’s mother, and the blessed St. Anne, that if WHATEVER “it” was that I really had, and was killing me, was truly revealed to me, I would beat it. And IF, whatever it was, was shown to me, I promised that I would dedicate the rest of my life to helping others with ‘it,’ also.

Oh, it was absolutely revealed to me. And I did get better. A lot better. And I kept my promise. (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Yet another misdiagnosed Lyme/MSIDS patient who got well after getting the proper diagnosis and treatment.

Here’s some more:

I could go onto infinity with stories of misdiagnosis. Sadly, we are no better off than we were when it was first ‘discovered’ in the 80’s.

https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/what-modern-light-bulbs-are-doing?

What Modern Light Bulbs Are Doing to Us

Decades of forgotten research show natural light is an essential nutrient, and the bill to bring back incandescent bulbs just cleared its first vote

A Midwestern Doctor

Oct. 29, 2026

Story at a Glance:

•Sunlight is one of the most important things for our health (e.g., avoiding it makes you 60% more likely to die), yet all we ever hear is how important it is to avoid it.

•Energy efficient light bulbs emit a narrow, blue-heavy spectrum that disrupts sleep and metabolism, while lacking the infrared our mitochondria depend upon.

•Decades of forgotten research (now being confirmed by modern studies) show unnatural light is a root cause of many inexplicable physical and behavioral illnesses.

•The eyes and the blood conduct light throughout the body, and when this process is disrupted (e.g., by glasses), significant illnesses can develop.

•In 2022, incandescent bulbs were effectively banned because their infrared was scored as “waste.” The Senate bill to bring them back has now cleared its first committee vote.

The Importance of Sunlight

Prior to dermatology’s war on the sun (which is immensely misguided as dangerous skin cancers are due to a lack of sunlight exposure), the value of sunlight was widely recognized in medicine. For example, in the early 1900s, heliotherapy (sunbathing) was used with great success for treating many otherwise incurable conditions such as the 1918 influenza1 and tuberculosis.1 The existing data in turn shows sunlight provides an immense degree of benefit:

•A large study found high solar UVB exposure halved one’s risk of breast and prostate cancer.1

•A 20-year study of 29,518 women found that avoiding the sun made one 60% more likely to die, with the greatest benefit of regular sun exposure being a reduced risk of dying from heart disease.1 Likewise, in a 2024 analysis of the UK Biobank, both measures of UV exposure that were examined were associated with a lower risk of dying from any cause, from cardiovascular disease and from cancer,1 and when 88,905 participants wore light sensors for a week, those with brighter days and those with darker nights were each less likely to die over the following 8 years.1

•Sunlight is critical for mental health, and many workers suffer immensely without it (e.g., in hospital night shift workers, a lack of sunlight exposure was linked to worse mental health1).

Note: I really got this point once, where after a long period of hospital night shifts under fluorescent lights, I noticed I was becoming clinically depressed (which has never otherwise happened to me). I went home and bathed under a full spectrum bulb, at which point I almost instantly felt better.

Typically, sunlight’s benefits are attributed to vitamin D. However, I have long suspected that many of the benefits of vitamin D are not due to the vitamin itself but rather that its elevation indicates the body is having regular sunlight exposure. For example, when 24 healthy volunteers were exposed to UVA (which does not produce vitamin D) at a dose equivalent to about 30 minutes of summer sun, their arteries dilated and their blood pressure dropped, as nitric oxide stored in the skin was released into the circulation.1 Similarly, a meta-analysis found that spending an hour or more a day in the summer sun was associated with a 16% lower risk of breast cancer, whereas simply living somewhere with more ambient UV was not.1 (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Excellent article that I can not recommend enough.

The importance of light pertains to all, but especially those of us in the Northern Latitude, like Wisconsin.

For more:

https://justusrhope.substack.com/p/the-daily-pills-that-stop-cancer

The Daily Pills that Stop Cancer

AI Refines the Root Detox™ Protocol

Justus R. Hope

Apr 02, 2025

∙ Paid

Revised Protocol Risk Reductions

Thursday Dr. Paul E. Marik and I announced an all-supplement daily cocktail that reduced cancer risk by some 60%. We improved on this with Metformin, Ivermectin, and Mebendazole to reduce risk to the 70 to 80% range.

Today we announce revisions accomplished over the past few days with the assistance of AI.

Without this time-saving help, these revisions would have taken months. But we do not have months to spare as the world is dealing with an unprecedented uptick in cancers. Everyone needs this information now.

We will begin at the beginning, starting with our first 3-Supplement AI search on Cancer Risk that established the baseline. We will end with the 90 to 95 percent Optimal Cancer Risk Reduction Protocol, that we display above and once again, with analysis, at the conclusion. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

I learned something new. (Well, to be fair I’m always learning something new!)

I learned that it’s important to take enteric capsules of berberine, for the same reasons your proteolytic enzymes need to be enteric: to protect the supplement from stomach acid, allowing it to be dissolved in the intestines to enhance absorption and effectiveness. Berberine also outperformed Metformin.

Users in berberine clinical literature consistently report effects on energy metabolism and AMPK activation beginning to appear at the 6-8 weeks mark with consistent daily use. The most significant observations typically occur in the 6-12 week window. Source

Enter the Root6™ OTC Protocol:

Root6™ is nothing more than our basic four + Berberine and Sulforaphane. But because of synergy, the Cancer Risk Reduction is magnified, which is why cocktails of repurposed drugs work so well against cancer (very similar to how effectively they work against HIV compared with monotherapy).

Keep in mind the Root6™ is all OTC. Source

https://zenodo.org/records/23666330

Published October 26, 2026 | Version v1

Preprint Open

mRNA Vaccine Shedding: Internal Transcriptional Dissemination and Potential Human-to-Human Transfer

Authors/Creators

Description
Abstract

COVID-19 mRNA vaccines direct host cells to manufacture prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that retains its furin cleavage site and carries two proline substitutions (K986P/V987P) in S2 that are not present in wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. This review examines two distinct forms of mRNA vaccine shedding: (i) molecular transcriptional shedding, involving the production, proteolytic fragmentation, persistence, and dissemination of vaccine-derived molecular products within vaccinated individuals through cellular division, extracellular release, and vesicular transport; and (ii) human-to-human shedding, involving the potential transfer of these products from vaccinated individuals to other individuals through biological secretions. Evidence supporting internal molecular dissemination includes circulating spike protein, proteolytically released fragments, vaccine-derived mRNA, and spike-bearing extracellular vesicles capable of transporting molecular cargo beyond its original cellular source. Human studies document circulating S1 within 24 hours, spike-bearing exosomes by day 14, vaccine mRNA in plasma for up to 28 days, vaccine-derived spike peptides at 69–187 days, spike protein in monocytes at 852 days, circulating spike at 1,173 days, exosomal vaccine mRNA at 1,284 days, and spike protein alongside plasmid-associated DNA sequences in skin at 1,364 days. N1-methylpseudouridine-associated +1 ribosomal frameshifting generates unintended translation products, expanding the repertoire of molecules potentially available for extracellular release. The proposed internal dissemination model incorporates two additional pathways: mitotic inheritance, whereby daughter cells may inherit an altered proteome following cellular division, and exosome-mediated communication, whereby molecular cargo may affect cells that never directly received vaccine mRNA. Experimental studies demonstrate spike-mediated interference with five interconnected molecular systems—coagulation, receptor–renin–angiotensin signaling, innate immune sensing, tumor-suppressor transcription, and vesicular interferon signaling. Together, these findings identify multiple pathways through which persistent vaccine-derived molecular products could disrupt cellular regulation, propagate abnormal signaling between cells, and potentially sustain downstream biological disturbances. Regarding human-to-human shedding, vaccine-derived mRNA has been detected in trace, fragmented form within breast-milk extracellular vesicles, establishing its presence in a biological secretion transferred between individuals. Extracellular vesicles are also present in saliva, exhaled breath, sweat, semen, and other bodily secretions. Their capacity to protect molecular cargo, survive biological barriers, enter recipient cells, and deliver functional mRNA provides a biologically plausible pathway for wider interpersonal transfer. An observational study further reported associations between proximity to vaccinated individuals and menstrual irregularities among unvaccinated women. However, no published study has directly demonstrated transfer of vaccine-derived spike protein, mRNA, or plasmid-associated DNA between individuals through respiratory emissions, saliva, sweat, or other non-milk secretions, leaving a critical evidence gap concerning the extent and biological consequences of human-to-human shedding. Collectively, these findings support intracellular and intercellular dissemination of vaccine-derived molecular products, with evidence of persistence extending over multiple years. The convergence of proteolytic fragmentation, vesicular transport, and potential mitotic inheritance suggests mechanisms through which molecular products and their downstream signaling effects could extend beyond the original cells of production. Direct experimental studies are needed to establish the functional consequences of long-term persistence, determine whether these pathways sustain molecular disturbances across cellular generations, and establish whether biologically significant human-to-human transfer occurs through additional bodily secretions and, if so, its extent.

For more:

Go here to listen to Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, explain the study.

**UPDATE**

The GRANITE Act, H.R. 10174, would stop foreign governments from censoring Americans on American soil. Rep. Michael Rulli of Ohio introduced it on August 27. Lawyer Preston Byrne designed it. Then it sat. On October 15, according to the official record at Congress.gov, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky added his name. He is still the only one.

GRANITE matters to every American who posts online. Britain, Russia, Australia and Azerbaijan are already reaching across the water.

Massie leaves Congress on January 3. The work now is to add names, so the bill is ready when it is reintroduced.

You can tell your Representative and both Senators in two minutes. The form and a copy-ready message are here. Source

https://read.sayerji.com/p/why-every-natural-health-advocate?

Why Every Mother Should Read the Epstein Files

Sayer Ji

Oct 03, 2026

A 2010 plan to watch mothers who asked questions about vaccines. A 2012 forward to Jeffrey Epstein asking for his idea about those mothers. A label that followed me for a decade. All of it is in the record now.

Picture a mother at a kitchen table in 2010. Her son has a fever after his shots, and she types a question into a search box: Is this normal?

That same year, in a report commissioned by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, consultants proposed a system to catch her question. They called it a “vaccine rumor surveillance system.” It appears on page 17. On the same page, the same report concedes “real and suspected adverse events following immunization.”

Real. Their word. The question the mother asked was legitimate, and they knew it. The system was for her anyway.

I know this because the report is in the Epstein files.

She was not the first

The mother at that table in 2010 had a long line of women behind her.

In the 1950s and 60s, the leading theory of autism blamed the mother. “Refrigerator mothers,” the experts called them: cold women who had frozen their children into silence. It took decades to retire that idea, and no one apologized for it.

Their daughters became the mothers of the 1990s and 2000s who watched a talking, laughing child go quiet after a round of shots, said so, and were told they had imagined the child they remembered. They were called hysterical, then anti-science, then dangerous. The one thing they were almost never called was witnesses.

The system they reported to was built not to hear them. In 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from most lawsuits and created a no-fault compensation program in their place; in 2011 the Supreme Court confirmed that the courthouse door stays shut. The program’s own reporting system, VAERS, is voluntary, and a federally funded Harvard study in 2010 found it captures fewer than one percent of adverse events. In 2008 the government quietly conceded one child’s case, Hannah Poling’s, agreeing that vaccines had aggravated an underlying disorder and produced “features of autism.” The next year, in a single omnibus proceeding, it turned away roughly five thousand families at once.

So when a mother said, “I saw my child regress,” here is what she had: no lawsuit, a reporting system that recorded almost nothing, a compensation program that had admitted one case and shut the door on thousands, and a public conversation that treated her memory as misinformation.

That is the history on page 17 of the Gates Foundation’s 2010 report. Its authors conceded that some adverse events after immunization are “real.” They proposed watching the mothers anyway. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

The ‘vaccine’ injured have faced the same persecution as those in Lymeland. The system it is all built upon was never created to truly help patients, which are gaslit, blamed, and harassed.

Important excerpt:

And on July 9, 2017, he [Epstein] wrote to Bill Gates proposing that philanthropists be “orgazanized to decide a shadow governmental grants structure.”

Ji points out that a ‘shadow governmental grants structure’ decides which research is funded, which health programs run and where, and which questions count as science and which count as misinformation. This shadow group usurps governmental decisions made in public, under oath, and subject to a vote.

It’s quite easy to see how Lymeland and ‘vaccines‘ have remained in their current state for decades, and it completely explains COVID madness. The structure remains in place, primed and ready for the next fiasco created by these ‘philanthropists’ that are ‘organized to decide a shadow governmental grants structure.’ Government is captured, science is captured, media is captured, mainstream medicine and professional organizations are captured, and so many remain clueless to this takeover.

Another important excerpt:

Go to justice.gov/epstein. Type EFTA00702570. Read the note about “Mother’s Army.” Then type EFTA01041100 and read the word “shadow” in Epstein’s own hand. Then decide who was spreading rumors.

If you want to go further, I made a free guide: Start Here: 12 Documents in the Epstein Files, and How to Read Them. Each entry has the original page, what it shows, what it doesn’t prove, and a link to check it yourself.

Get the free guide →

For more: