New US Customs Rules Threaten Your Access to Natural Health
By The ANH Team
10/15/2026
Stronger border checks for personal imports can protect Americans from unsafe foreign products, but the same rules could also shrink consumer access and choice. Action Alert!
THE TOPLINE
New customs requirements could mean higher prices, delayed deliveries, and fewer natural health choices for consumers buying products from overseas.
Stronger scrutiny can protect consumers from unsafe products, but added costs and paperwork could also drive responsible small suppliers out of the U.S. market.
We support practical, risk-based import procedures that target illegal products while preserving access to compliant products from reputable companies.
Consumers who buy natural health products from overseas could soon face higher prices, delayed deliveries, and fewer choices. A new Customs and Border Protection (CBP) rule that comes into force on October 22, 2026 adds hurdles that may discourage smaller companies from supplying American customers. Our concern is that responsible businesses could be caught alongside sellers of unsafe or illegal products. Additionally, patients who import life-saving medications for personal use that are not currently manufactured in the US may find there are delays or even barriers at US borders which could endanger lives.
What’s Changing
Low-value packages (under $800) imported for personal use previously benefited from a customs exemption that simplified their entry into the United States. The new CBP rule removes that exemption for international mail and adds stricter requirements for mailed products overseen by agencies such as FDA.
CBP offers an electronic option for some shipments, but it still requires detailed information, someone legally responsible for the import, and a financial guarantee called a customs bond. Suppliers may need specialist help, adding costs that consumers could ultimately pay.
The rule does not itself ban all imported medicines or abolish FDA’s personal importation policy. But administrative barriers can make an established supply route unusable. (See link for article)
Open Letter Regarding the Removal of the mRNA Platform
Addressed to Secretary Kennedy and President Trump by Americans for Health Freedom and the listed signatories.
An open letter demanding that President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. remove mRNA vaccines from the market has surpassed 3,300 signatures, according to Dr. Mary Talley Bowden.
Today, Dr. Bowden confirmed to JonFleetwood.com that the letter had collected 3,397 signatures as of her latest count.
The signatories reportedly have a combined social media following of more than 66 million.
Published September 18 by Americans for Health Freedom, the letter challenges the Trump administration over its failure to deliver on a central demand of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement: removing mRNA products from the market.
Doctors, scientists, legislators, and other public officials have signed a letter calling for greater transparency, independent investigation, and accountability over unresolved questions surrounding COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy.
Do not worry if you aren’t a doctor, researcher, or PhD – sign it anyway.
The dangerous mRNA platform concerns everyone and should include everyone’s input. Future generations depend upon our action. It should concern us greatly that within 72 hours of a Siberian lab worker dying without a plague diagnosis, vaccine stocks shot up 20%, proving a fear narrative and countermeasure economy are fully built and waiting to be set in motion at any time by an unresolved death, long before any evidence.
The CDC literally changed the definition of vaccine so that mRNA fit the category. Comparing old and new versions of what they posted on their website, here was the definition on the CDC website in 2020:
Vaccines contain the same germs that cause disease . . . But they have been killed or weakened to the point that they don’t make you sick.
The new version became much more general, to include mRNA. Here is the current definition on the CDC website:
A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.
Many points stated are inaccurate at best. For instance, many become ill after vaccination. In fact, many become ill with the actual disease they are vaccinating for.
Using the genetic code of COVID, a mRNA strand is constructed to create a specific protein
Gene therapy doesn’t work for long, requiring multiple doses and perfect conditions in the body
Never before have human cells been hijacked to create something that is supposed to attack the body
Overnight this technology used on a minority with particular deficiencies, was used on everyone to combat a virus
This gene therapy acts as a Trojan Horse by moving into cells to create a portion of the virus known as the spike protein
This important article explains that this Trojan Horse does NOT actually contain mRNA which is short-lived, but rather modified RNA (“modRNA”) which is developed for longevity which will disrupt and block cell metabolism and be incorporated into the human genome
It is asinine to expect the mRNA platform to work like a traditional vaccine
The ‘powers that be’ knew the shots wouldn’t give you lasting immunity and probably wouldn’t work on variants.
They had no idea of side effects as it has never been used to create an antigen.
Founded in 2010, Moderna never talked about vaccines – only therapeutics and they never made any money at all.
High-ranking officials in the FDA and CDC have financial conflicts of interests with Moderna and Pfizer.
It’s called a “platform” for drug delivery because new drugs are needed for variants, creating a endless market.
COVID was used to get the public used to mRNA due to the conflicts of interests they have with a myriad of other drugs that are now in the pipeline.
It’s a win-win for profits for Big Pharma as well as the Biosecurity state allowing for the ability to track people’s movements through “vaccination” cards. It’s also a win for power-brokers like Gates, the Davos crowd, WEF, WHO, and corrupt politicians desiring a mechanism to gain greater biological control over the population, and to be able to give or take away rights on command, naturally leading to eugenics.
🔷 Christian Perronne Infectious Disease Specialist, former Head of Department at the Garches University Hospital
Author of several books, including most recently “The Awakening, 4 Years Later” (co-written with Stéphane Chatry, Guy Tredaniel Publishers)
________________
**Comment**
By using the closed caption setting and translating the transcript to English, you can listen to Dr. Perronne’s take on the current state of Lymeland and how mainstream medicine continues to deny chronic Lyme disease.
For more than fifteen years, GreenMedInfo has indexed the peer-reviewed literature on electromagnetic field exposure under a single heading: Electromagnetic Field Harms. As of this week, that page holds 1,009 research abstracts, tagged to 156 distinct health outcomes and 30 natural substances studied for protective effects. Every record links to its PubMed entry. Anyone can read it. Nobody in the federal government has ever been asked to.
Until now.
This article does three things. It explains, in plain language, what the index actually shows — including the parts that cut against the easy story. It explains why the timing matters, which comes down to a 1996 rulebook and a 2021 court decision that was never answered. And it shows you how to file a comment in five minutes, whether you are a parent with a story or a physician with a caseload.
The outcomes with the most studies behind them are not exotic. They are oxidative stress (167 abstracts), DNA damage (82), male infertility (44), lipid peroxidation (43), cognitive decline (38), cancers (34), low sperm quality (33), brain cancer (28), headache (20), sleep disorders (15) and fatigue (14). Further down the list: childhood leukemia, acoustic neuroma, salivary gland disease, hearing disorders, ALS, Alzheimer’s, autism spectrum disorders, birth defects, hypothyroidism, autoimmune disease. (See link for article)
_______________
**Comment**
Lyme/MSIDS patients need to take the deleterious health effects of EMF seriously as it compounds their symptoms and is a known ‘illness intensifier.’ I highly recommend this article as Ji corrects many details used by EMF supporters as well as shows you how to quickly file a comment on either your experience or evidence. Please take the time to do so. Deadline is October 21, 2026
Researcher James Roguski told The Defender that Monday’s declaration is a “sideshow to the main event” — the potential adoption of pathogen access and benefit-sharing (PABS) which includes sharing biological samples and genetic data in exchange for any resulting vaccines, treatments and diagnostics. High-income countries, including the U.S., have objected to sharing potentially valuable technology and intellectual property with lower-income nations.
Roguski said talks on PABS will continue next month — and that a potentially binding agreement may arise from these ongoing talks, which would be “of great consequence to us all, including the U.S.”
“If the PABS negotiations reach agreement and the Pandemic Agreement is approved by the World Health Assembly in May of 2027, then the next U.S. administration will be able to sign on the Agreement and/or rejoin the WHO,” Roguski said.
The UN’s pandemic declaration commits governments to counter health “misinformation” and never mentions freedom of expression, privacy or informed consent. The United States objected to other things.
Disclosure: I am a named plaintiff in Finn et al. v. Global Engagement Center (dismissed with prejudice on 28 July 2026) and the founder of Restore the First, the coalition the plaintiffs convened.
Article Excerpts:
On 12 October 2026 the UN General Assembly adopted a pandemic declaration by 153 votes to 3, with 2 abstentions (UN News). Paragraph 57 commits governments to “take measures to counter and address” health “misinformation, disinformation,” and to foster “trust in public health systems and authorities.” It defines neither term and never mentions freedom of expression, privacy or informed consent. The one government I can confirm dissociating from that commitment on the record, Italy, voted yes. The United States, which called the vote, did not raise it.
The declaration is non-binding. By “permanent emergency” I mean the argument of my white paper: an emergency architecture with no exit conditions. The declaration does not declare one. The question is what it leaves out.
The vocabulary is not new either: the amended International Health Regulations (IHR) already list “risk communication, including addressing misinformation and disinformation” among core capacities (conference text). Three things still make this the sentence to watch.
Wider than its method. “Take measures to counter and address” is the operative phrase. Nothing says the measures stop at education, and no paragraph says what they may not include.
No definitions, no referee. Italy, which voted yes, called “infodemic management, misinformation, disinformation, and stigmatization” “not the subject of an agreed definition.”
A medical choice as a target. “Countering vaccine hesitancy” sits inside the commitment. The declaration never mentions informed consent.
The declaration has no emergency thresholds, no sunset clause, no review by courts or legislatures, no list of rights that cannot be suspended and no informed-consent guarantee.
In spring 2022, nearly 140,000 of its advocates emailed and called their representatives in support of a bill to defund the WHO, and 46 lawmakers signed on within a month.
That withdrawal rests on an executive order, which a future president could reverse. Stand for Health Freedom is now asking Americans to back H.R. 3839, Rep. Tim Burchett’s bill to make the exit permanent in law, because “without a law, the U.S. could rejoin the WHO at any time without Congress’ approval.” [standforhealthfreedom]
Take action: Tell your representative to cosponsor H.R. 3839 →[standforhealthfreedom]
(See link for article)
__________________
**Comment**
The ‘powers that be’ are working overtime to give the illusion the U.S. is outside the power of the WHO’s pandemic treaty when the devil’s in the fine print. Nothing’s changed and can revert right back to overarching tyranny anytime someone declares a ‘pandemic’ emergency.
