Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

2 MILLION Disabled by COVID Shots & Investigation Shows FDA Hid 25 Safety Signals

June 2, 2026

Tech entrepreneur Steve Kirsch used advanced AI to analyze raw, independent datasets about mRNA injuries – and uncovered what “no public health official wants to know.” Legacy media continues to ignore the staggering reality of adverse reactions and side effects of mRNA for COVID-19. Steve Kirsch took matters into his own hands – and his latest analysis estimates that as many as 2 million Americans were seriously disabled by the shots. He joins Dr. Kelly Victory to share his methods, how he used AI to analyze the data, and why “not a single national public-health authority, anywhere in the world, has produced an estimate of the type we just constructed.”

CHAPTERS

0:00 – Dr. Kelly Victory & Steve Kirsch: Exposing mRNA Data

5:30 – How Steve Kirsch Used AI To Analyze mRNA Injuries

18:15 – Steve Kirsch Offered $3.3 Million To Debate The Science, Nobody Took It

24:40 – “Scared Of Losing”: Why They Refuse To Debate Kirsch’s data

38:20 – Breaking Down The 55x Higher Risk Data

55:00 – The Missing Demographic: Where Are The 60-Year-Olds With These Conditions?

1:04:15 – How We Take Back The Public Health Bureaucracy

/www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-senate-investigation-finds-f15

BREAKING: Senate Investigation Finds FDA Officials Covered-Up 25 COVID Shot Safety Signals

FDA’s own data flagged sudden cardiac death, heart attacks, blood clots, neurological damage, and dementia… and the FDA analyst uncovering it was ordered to “cease and desist.”

Apr 29, 2026

by Nicolas Hulscher, MPH

A new Majority Staff Interim Report from Sen. Ron Johnson’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations was released today (April 29, 2026), titled Unmasked: How Biden Health Officials Purposely Turned a Blind Eye Toward COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Signals.

Even after Dr. Szarfman and DuMouchel published their findings in Drug Safety (2022) showing masking was eight times more likely with COVID vaccines, and Dr. Robert Califf replied “Thanks. These are good,” no changes were made to the methodology.

This is documented, internal FDA communication showing deliberate suppression of safety signals at the exact moment millions of Americans were being told the shots were “safe and effective.” (See link for article)

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

Shedding is Real – But It’s Not What You Think & Italy Finds Pfizer Shot Responsible for Neuro Damage

https://covidmythbuster.substack.com/p/shedding-is-real-but-its-not-what

Shedding is real – But It’a Not What You Think

Why thousands of unvaccinated people reported symptoms after contact with the vaccinated… and what the actual biology shows.

Marc Girardot

Apr 27, 2026

In 2022, I first wrote an article stating there was simply no way spike proteins or even LNPs could be shedding in quantities or concentrations capable of harming unvaccinated people.

Many unvaccinated readers were unhappy with me. They wrote back, clearly frustrated, insisting they were not liars. They had suffered real conditions after interacting with vaccinated people.

Excerpts of article as given on ‘The Expose’:

So, I decided to look closer. In June 2022, I created a detailed questionnaire and collected responses from 182 unvaccinated people who believed they had experienced shedding-related symptoms.  The patterns were striking.

Denying these experiences would have been a mistake. The question was never “are people imagining things?” The real question was, “What is the actual mechanism behind what they are experiencing?”

The story starts inside the principal endocrine glands. In men, the testes have a blood-testis barrier (“BTB”) that can become leaky after vaccination (that most likely explains the drop in sperm count by the way). When that happens, hormones – and possibly increased numbers of immune cells – can escape into the semen. In women, the ovaries have their own blood-ovarian barrier that can allow excess hormones to leak out. The leaks are mostly transient, but can be partly permanent.

These substances can then reach the mucosa – the nose, mouth, and gastrointestinal tract – where they can be aerosolised or exchanged during normal daily contact.

Conclusion

The evidence – both from the survey and from basic biology – points to a clear and coherent mechanism.

Shedding is real. But what is actually being shed in quantities and concentrations capable of producing observable effects is overwhelmingly hormones leaking through damaged blood-tissue barriers, not spike protein or lipid nanoparticles. The low-dilution routes (semen during unprotected sex, breast milk when the blood-milk barrier is compromised) and the cumulative low-level exposure in poorly ventilated indoor spaces explain the patterns we see in the real world far better than any theory of vaccine-particle transmission.

Understanding this mechanism doesn’t mean dismissing people’s experiences – quite the opposite. It means we can look at the reports with clarity instead of fear. It means we can focus on supporting endothelial and barrier health rather than living in panic about “shedders.”

We must not forget to protect the children and their mothers from the harm of these ill-injected vaccines by informing them. (See link for article)

_________________

For more:

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/historic-decision-in-italy-pfizer?

Historic Decision in Italy: Pfizer “Vaccine” Found Responsible for Serious Neurological Damage

The Turin Court of Appeal has just handed down a verdict that could well shake the foundations of vaccine certainty in Europe.

By The Citizens’ Collective and Xavier Azalbert Global Research, May 18, 2026 France Soir 13 May 2026

The Turin Court of Appeal has just handed down a verdict that could well shake the foundations of vaccine certainty in Europe.

On May 11, 2026, it confirmed the causal link between the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty Covid-19 vaccine and severe transverse myelitis in a shopkeeper from Piedmont, ordering the Italian Ministry of Health to pay her monthly compensation.

This is not an isolated case: the initial ruling by the Asti Civil Court (October 2025) had already been issued, and the Ministry’s appeal was rejected. This rare legal precedent, based on independent expert opinions, could inspire thousands of victims in France. (See link for article)



Category:

Activism, research, vaccines

New Lyme Vaccine: How Much BS Can We Tolerate?

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/u/34624473

NEW LYME VACCINE: How much vaccine BS (safe and effective) can we tolerate??

Carl Tuttle Hudson, NH, United States

May 17, 2026

—– Forwarded Message —–
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: thart15@jh.edu <thart15@jh.edu>
Cc: kremington@ktvn.com <kremington@ktvn.com>; producers@ktvn.com <producers@ktvn.com>
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2026 at 09:16:59 AM EDT
Subject: Health Watch: Lyme disease vaccine

KTVN 2 News Nevada

Kristen Remington Anchor/Reporter

Health Watch: Lyme disease vaccine

Quote:

“There used to be a Lyme disease vaccine called LYMErix in the late 90’s and early 2000’s. This was eventually pulled off the market due to low sales.” -Thomas M. Hart, PhD

Thomas M. Hart, PhD

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

615 N. Wolfe Street, E5638

Baltimore Maryland 21205

Dr. Hart,

“Low sales” of the LYMErix vaccine is not the entire truth and has been regurgitated across mainstream media. 

The vaccine known as LYMErix was supposed to expose the immune system to the outer surface protein A (OspA) of the spirochete responsible for causing Lyme disease but for some patients, it caused the same crippling effects of the disease itself as reported in the class action lawsuit:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/sodqs3pdeeesktf/Sheller%20Lymerix.pdf?dl=0

Excerpt from the lawsuit:

“The people who have contacted us were, prior to vaccination with LYMErix, healthy, active and energetic. Indeed, the very reason they sought the LYMErix vaccine was their desire to preserve their healthy, active lifestyle. However, what they experienced was a dramatic degradation of their health and quality of life. As will be described below, these previously healthy individuals are now afflicted with painful, at times debilitating arthritic symptoms, including joint pain and swelling, as well as extremely severe Lyme-disease-like symptoms which have persisted to this day.”

Below is the link to the Final Judgement and Approval of the class action against SmithKline Beecham as a settlement was awarded to these individuals.

JUDGEMENT, FINAL ORDER AND DECREE GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT:

https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/811ar7u22g1x7vrgiwjhx/2003_Vaccine_Judgement_Final_Sttle_Apprvl..pdf?rlkey=ot1sl13exzgm2bv7ldfe7ks53&dl=0

A chronic relapsing seronegative disease does not fit the vaccine model so chronic Lyme which is completely devastating to the patient is not recognized and there is no treatment. The disabled Lyme patient is left to fend for himself because treating this class of patient became too expensive as outlined in the racketeering lawsuit. There is a growing community of horribly disabled patients whose disability has gone unrecognized for three decades.

Here’s yet another victim:

Nicole Malachowski: Unfit for Duty from Debilitating Tick-Borne Disease

http://cdmrp.army.mil/cwg/stories/2018/nicole_malachowski_profile

“Her medical retirement, however, was premature. At only 43 years old, she was deemed unfit for duty due to neurological damage from tick-borne illness.”

The latest vaccine from French drug manufacturer Valneva is another OspA vaccine similar to LYMErix so the possibility exists that the class of patient who experienced the debilitating effects of LYMErix could end up with the same results. There was no attempt to uncover why LYMErix disabled the patient as described in the class action. Until we fully understand how Lyme disease disables its victim aren’t we playing Russian roulette with people’s health?

Respectfully Submitted,

Carl Tuttle

Independent Researcher

Hudson, NH

Suppressing evidence of persistent infection after antibiotic treatment for Lyme disease is not collaboration, it is collusion:

Peer Reviewed Evidence of Persistence of Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and Tick-Borne Diseases (700 references)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/n09sk90eo6xz7ua/700%20articles%20LYME%20EvidenceofPersistence-V2.pdf?dl=0

For more:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, Ticks, vaccines

Study: Big Pharma’s Bribery Schemes

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2026/04/study-finds-all-major-pharmaceutical-companies-implicated-in-bribery-schemes/

Study Finds All Major Pharmaceutical Companies Implicated in Bribery Schemes

by Carolyn Hendler, JD

Published 

A study published in February 2026 in the Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics is the first to compile decades of Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) enforcement records into a single analysis. Researchers Kohler, Khan, and Bowra reviewed OECD Working Group on Bribery reports from 1999 through early 2025 and found that virtually every major pharmaceutical company operating globally has been implicated in at least one foreign bribery scheme.1

The underlying cases were drawn from U.S. Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement actions documented over many years. Together, they reveal a pattern of corruption spanning dozens of countries and totaling more than one billion dollars in penalties.

Pfizer, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Among Vaccine Companies Implicated

The researchers identified 21 investigations involving 19 pharmaceutical companies and numerous subsidiaries across five OECD member nations. The United States accounted for 14 of those investigations, followed by Germany and Denmark with three each, and Greece and Italy with one each.2 Among the companies publicly named were Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, Novartis, Teva, GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, Novo Nordisk, SciClone, BioTest, and Nordion.3

The study defines bribery as “the offering, promising, giving, accepting or soliciting of an advantage as an inducement for an action which is illegal, unethical or a breach of trust.”4

The authors explain:

… pharmaceutical company bribes and other financial inducements can distort prescribing and compromise regulations that are designed to ensure drug safety and efficacy. More generally, pharmaceutical industry corruption affects patient safety and health care resource allocation worldwide.5

Over One Billion Dollars in Sanctions Paid Out by Companies

The implicated companies paid a combined $1,111,225,911 in sanctions. That total included $586,263,414 in fines, $447,237,274 in returned profits, and $77,545,872 in prejudgment interest.6 Despite the scale of the financial penalties, not one company admitted wrongdoing in any of the 21 cases.7

How the Bribery Schemes Operated

The study found that bribery schemes were not isolated acts by low-level employees acting on their own. Rather, senior executives and regional directors within the drug companies approved and, in some cases, directed the payments. Subsidiaries, shell companies, and third-party vendors were used to route payments and give them the appearance of legitimacy. Twelve of the 19 investigations found that subsidiaries were used specifically to conceal bribery operations. The bribes were used to secure regulatory approvals, influence prescribing patterns, and drive drug sales in markets around the world.8

Bribes Hidden in Distributor Discounts

A second pattern identified in the study involved pharmaceutical companies granting unusually steep discounts to distributors. The distributors then used the excess funds to pay bribes to physicians and government officials. Companies falsely recorded the discounts as legitimate marketing or sales expenses, concealing the payments in their books.

The arrangement had a direct consequence for patients. When physicians received payments tied to a particular drug, their prescribing decisions were driven by financial benefit rather than patient need.10

Novartis Vietnam worked with a distributor that paid bribes directly to healthcare providers and reimbursed up to 50 percent of those costs through credit notes. Teva Mexico funneled cash to physicians through a Copaxone distributor and mislabeled the payments as revenue reductions. Eli Lilly’s Brazilian subsidiary granted discounts of 17 to 19 percent instead of the standard 10 percent, concealing a six percent bribe to state officials within the markup.11

Novartis

Between 2012 and 2015, a Novartis subsidiary in Greece bribed employees at state-owned hospitals and clinics to increase prescriptions for Lucentis, a drug used to treat macular degeneration. Physicians were paid more than $5,000 per event attended. Internal Novartis documents described the arrangement as a return on investment and tied physician payments to their prescription volumes.12

In South Korea, a Novartis subsidiary channeled more than $16.3 million through third-party medical journals as improper payments to physicians. In June 2020, Novartis and its subsidiaries agreed to pay $345 million to resolve Foreign Corrupt Practices Act charges brought by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Novartis Hellas SACI paid a criminal penalty of $225 million and entered a three-year deferred prosecution agreement.13

Johnson & Johnson

In Greece, Poland, and Romania, Johnson & Johnson subsidiaries and agents used slush funds, sham contracts, and offshore accounts in the Isle of Man to reward physicians and hospital administrators. The drug company was also accused of paying kickbacks in Iraq.

Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay more than $48 million to resolve SEC charges and $21.4 million to resolve parallel DOJ criminal charges. However, the large pharmaceutical company did not admit or deny the allegations.14

Pfizer

Pfizer subsidiaries in Italy and Russia were accused by the SEC in 2012 of paying bribes over approximately a decade to foreign government officials. They paid the bribes in order to secure regulatory and formulary approvals, boost sales, and increase prescriptions.

After voluntarily disclosing the misconduct in 2004, Pfizer agreed to pay $26.3 million to the SEC to resolve the charges. Its subsidiary Pfizer HCP paid a separate $15 million criminal penalty to the DOJ. Like the other big pharmaceutical companies, Pfizer did not admit or deny the allegations.15

Teva

Teva Pharmaceuticals made illicit payments to government officials in Russia, Ukraine, and Mexico to increase market share, according to the U.S. Department of Justice and the SEC. Those payments generated $214 million in illegal profits. Teva agreed to pay $283 million in criminal fines to the DOJ and $236 million in disgorgement and prejudgment interest to the SEC, for a combined total of $519 million.16

GlaxoSmithKline

GlaxoSmithKline’s subsidiary in China was fined CN¥3 billion by Chinese authorities after an investigation found it had bribed physicians to increase drug sales. It was the largest fine imposed by a Chinese court at the time. The Securities and Exchange Commission later resolved Foreign Corrupt Practices Act charges against the company for the same conduct, settling for $20 million.17

AstraZeneca and Sanofi

AstraZeneca paid $5.5 million to the SEC to resolve charges that it made improper payments to government-controlled healthcare providers in China and Russia.18 Sanofi settled Foreign Corrupt Practices Act charges with the SEC for $25.2 million in 2018. The agency found that employees and agents in multiple countries made improper payments to foreign officials, including physicians, between 2011 and 2015.19

Zero Admissions of Wrongdoing

Across all 21 investigations spanning more than two decades of OECD monitoring, no pharmaceutical company admitted any wrongdoing. Companies paid the over one billion dollars in combined penalties and moved forward. The study’s authors concluded that bribery in the pharmaceutical sector is not an isolated event but a systemic and recurring feature of how some of the world’s largest drug companies have operated in markets across the globe.20 21

The authors suggest that the wide-spread pattern of bribery across the pharmaceutical industry is indicative of institutional corruption. Both the legal and illegal acts of bribery by big pharma “pervert institution’s function under conditions that may promote personal benefit” and serve to undermine the public.

Click top link to view References

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines

Washington Joins WHO Pandemic Orchestration & Surveillance Network ‘GOARN’ – Citing Bird Flu as Justification

https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/washington-joins-who-pandemic-orchestration?

Washington Joins WHO Pandemic Orchestration and Surveillance Network ‘GOARN’—Citing Bird Flu as Justification

Follows California, Illinois, Colorado, and New York City’s entry into same transnational WHO outbreak coordination system.
Jon Fleetwood
Apr 16, 2026

Governor Bob Ferguson announced this month that Washington State is now part of the World Health Organization Global Outbreak and Response Network (GOARN), an international syndicate of “public health agencies, national governments, academic centers, laboratories, and response organizations focused on rapidly detecting and responding to public health emergencies,” according to a press release from the Washington State Nurses Association (WSNA).

Washington joins California, Illinois, Colorado, and New York City by entering GOARN.

According to WSNA, Washington’s public health leaders will fall in line with the WHO’s:

  • global outbreak early-warning alerts, meaning real-time surveillance tied into an international detection system
  • technical collaboration and support during major public health events, meaning coordinated response across jurisdictions
  • international training, exercises, and best-practice exchanges, meaning standardized response protocols
  • and coordinated outbreak response support, meaning integrated deployment during declared emergencies.

Congress has already confirmed that the WHO’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic “was an abject failure” and that the WHO’s “newest effort to solve the problems exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic — via a “Pandemic Treaty” — may harm the United States.”

This means Washington’s decision comes despite federal findings that the WHO mismanaged the last pandemic and is advancing new agreements that could expand its influence over future responses.

You can contact Gov. Ferguson’s office here to voice your opposition to Washington’s integration into a WHO-linked outbreak surveillance and response system and demand accountability for aligning state public health infrastructure with failed global coordination mechanisms.  (See link for article)

____________

**Comment**

Take away: states are bypassing the federal government’s move to remain sovereign and not under the umbrella of unelected globalists like the international WHO; however, it’s all clear as mud as there still remains a legal path for U.S./WHO collaboration due to Congress authorizing up to 60 U.S. Public Health Service employees assigned to work through and with WHO-funded programs, alongside USAID and UNICEF—entities closely integrated with the same global health governance framework.

In global health policy, “child survival activities” is a broad WHO umbrella that routinely includes vaccination campaigns, disease surveillance, outbreak response, and health-system operations, meaning the statute authorizes U.S. personnel to work inside WHO-funded public-health infrastructure—not narrow, child-only care—despite the formal withdrawal.

Congress also enacted legislation allocating at least $5.5 billion in taxpayer funding to finance pandemic and outbreak preparedness in fiscal year 2026—despite no declared pandemic and no formal emergency authorization.

The funding is contained in the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026 (H.R. 7148), which Trump signed into law on February 3, 2026, after the bill passed both chambers of Congress and was presented to the White House earlier that day.  Source

Influenza is the only purported virus explicitly named in the statute.

It’s important to note that Sayer Ji’s beautifully laid out article, “20 Year Architecture Behind Pandemic As a Business Model With Bill Gates at the Center,” gives the whole bloody picture.

All of this should feel like déjà vu to anyone reading this website, because it’s been done before, like a bad movie script that keeps being recycled, and now states are making global tyranny even easier to achieve!

Globally orchestrated
Problem, Reaction, Solution

It’s a win, win for the powerful who gain financially.

Important quote:

The same architects of the last plandemic are priming the world for the next one — the inevitable consequence of a world that never held them accountable.

 

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses