Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Why Every Mother Should Read the Epstein Files

**UPDATE**

The GRANITE Act, H.R. 10174, would stop foreign governments from censoring Americans on American soil. Rep. Michael Rulli of Ohio introduced it on August 27. Lawyer Preston Byrne designed it. Then it sat. On October 15, according to the official record at Congress.gov, Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky added his name. He is still the only one.

GRANITE matters to every American who posts online. Britain, Russia, Australia and Azerbaijan are already reaching across the water.

Massie leaves Congress on January 3. The work now is to add names, so the bill is ready when it is reintroduced.

You can tell your Representative and both Senators in two minutes. The form and a copy-ready message are here. Source

https://read.sayerji.com/p/why-every-natural-health-advocate?

Why Every Mother Should Read the Epstein Files

Sayer Ji

Oct 03, 2026

A 2010 plan to watch mothers who asked questions about vaccines. A 2012 forward to Jeffrey Epstein asking for his idea about those mothers. A label that followed me for a decade. All of it is in the record now.

Picture a mother at a kitchen table in 2010. Her son has a fever after his shots, and she types a question into a search box: Is this normal?

That same year, in a report commissioned by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, consultants proposed a system to catch her question. They called it a “vaccine rumor surveillance system.” It appears on page 17. On the same page, the same report concedes “real and suspected adverse events following immunization.”

Real. Their word. The question the mother asked was legitimate, and they knew it. The system was for her anyway.

I know this because the report is in the Epstein files.

She was not the first

The mother at that table in 2010 had a long line of women behind her.

In the 1950s and 60s, the leading theory of autism blamed the mother. “Refrigerator mothers,” the experts called them: cold women who had frozen their children into silence. It took decades to retire that idea, and no one apologized for it.

Their daughters became the mothers of the 1990s and 2000s who watched a talking, laughing child go quiet after a round of shots, said so, and were told they had imagined the child they remembered. They were called hysterical, then anti-science, then dangerous. The one thing they were almost never called was witnesses.

The system they reported to was built not to hear them. In 1986, Congress shielded vaccine makers from most lawsuits and created a no-fault compensation program in their place; in 2011 the Supreme Court confirmed that the courthouse door stays shut. The program’s own reporting system, VAERS, is voluntary, and a federally funded Harvard study in 2010 found it captures fewer than one percent of adverse events. In 2008 the government quietly conceded one child’s case, Hannah Poling’s, agreeing that vaccines had aggravated an underlying disorder and produced “features of autism.” The next year, in a single omnibus proceeding, it turned away roughly five thousand families at once.

So when a mother said, “I saw my child regress,” here is what she had: no lawsuit, a reporting system that recorded almost nothing, a compensation program that had admitted one case and shut the door on thousands, and a public conversation that treated her memory as misinformation.

That is the history on page 17 of the Gates Foundation’s 2010 report. Its authors conceded that some adverse events after immunization are “real.” They proposed watching the mothers anyway. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

The ‘vaccine’ injured have faced the same persecution as those in Lymeland. The system it is all built upon was never created to truly help patients, which are gaslit, blamed, and harassed.

Important excerpt:

And on July 9, 2017, he [Epstein] wrote to Bill Gates proposing that philanthropists be “orgazanized to decide a shadow governmental grants structure.”

Ji points out that a ‘shadow governmental grants structure’ decides which research is funded, which health programs run and where, and which questions count as science and which count as misinformation. This shadow group usurps governmental decisions made in public, under oath, and subject to a vote.

It’s quite easy to see how Lymeland and ‘vaccines‘ have remained in their current state for decades, and it completely explains COVID madness. The structure remains in place, primed and ready for the next fiasco created by these ‘philanthropists’ that are ‘organized to decide a shadow governmental grants structure.’ Government is captured, science is captured, media is captured, mainstream medicine and professional organizations are captured, and so many remain clueless to this takeover.

Another important excerpt:

Go to justice.gov/epstein. Type EFTA00702570. Read the note about “Mother’s Army.” Then type EFTA01041100 and read the word “shadow” in Epstein’s own hand. Then decide who was spreading rumors.

If you want to go further, I made a free guide: Start Here: 12 Documents in the Epstein Files, and How to Read Them. Each entry has the original page, what it shows, what it doesn’t prove, and a link to check it yourself.

Get the free guide →

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

ACTION: Sign the Open Letter To Remove the mRNA Platform

According to journalist Jon Fleetwood, the letter has surpassed 3,300 signatures. Let’s get that number up. Add your name today.

https://americansforhealthfreedom.org/letter-to-kennedy

Open letter · September 18, 2026

Open Letter Regarding the Removal of the mRNA Platform

Addressed to Secretary Kennedy and President Trump by Americans for Health Freedom and the listed signatories.

An open letter demanding that President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. remove mRNA vaccines from the market has surpassed 3,300 signatures, according to Dr. Mary Talley Bowden.

Today, Dr. Bowden confirmed to JonFleetwood.com that the letter had collected 3,397 signatures as of her latest count.

The signatories reportedly have a combined social media following of more than 66 million.

Published September 18 by Americans for Health Freedom, the letter challenges the Trump administration over its failure to deliver on a central demand of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement: removing mRNA products from the market.

Doctors, scientists, legislators, and other public officials have signed a letter calling for greater transparency, independent investigation, and accountability over unresolved questions surrounding COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy.

You can sign the letter here.

________________

**Comment**

Do not worry if you aren’t a doctor, researcher, or PhD – sign it anyway.

The dangerous mRNA platform concerns everyone and should include everyone’s input. Future generations depend upon our action. It should concern us greatly that within 72 hours of a Siberian lab worker dying without a plague diagnosis, vaccine stocks shot up 20%, proving a fear narrative and countermeasure economy are fully built and waiting to be set in motion at any time by an unresolved death, long before any evidence.

The CDC literally changed the definition of vaccine so that mRNA fit the category. Comparing old and new versions of what they posted on their website, here was the definition on the CDC website in 2020:

Vaccines contain the same germs that cause disease . . . But they have been killed or weakened to the point that they don’t make you sick.

The new version became much more general, to include mRNA. Here is the current definition on the CDC website:

A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.

Many points stated are inaccurate at best. For instance, many become ill after vaccination. In fact, many become ill with the actual disease they are vaccinating for.

We’ve since learned the dangerous and ineffective COVID gene therapy was developed by the military and was passed by the FDA by ignoring data and by bypassing passing the advisory panel. It has ZERO to do with health. The White House orchestrated a cover-up of heart damage caused by the injections and U.S. officials knew the safety system was flawed and ignored the FDA doctor who alerted them.

SUMMARY:

  • Using the genetic code of COVID, a mRNA strand is constructed to create a specific protein
  • Gene therapy doesn’t work for long, requiring multiple doses and perfect conditions in the body
  • Never before have human cells been hijacked to create something that is supposed to attack the body
  • Overnight this technology used on a minority with particular deficiencies, was used on everyone to combat a virus
  • This gene therapy acts as a Trojan Horse by moving into cells to create a portion of the virus known as the spike protein
  • This important article explains that this Trojan Horse does NOT actually contain mRNA which is short-lived, but rather modified RNA (“modRNA”) which is developed for longevity which will disrupt and block cell metabolism and be incorporated into the human genome
  • It is asinine to expect the mRNA platform to work like a traditional vaccine
  • It doesn’t work against variants which is called original antigenic sin
  • The ‘powers that be’ knew the shots wouldn’t give you lasting immunity and probably wouldn’t work on variants.
  • They had no idea of side effects as it has never been used to create an antigen.
  • Founded in 2010, Moderna never talked about vaccines – only therapeutics and they never made any money at all.
  • High-ranking officials in the FDA and CDC have financial conflicts of interests with Moderna and Pfizer.
  • It’s called a “platform” for drug delivery because new drugs are needed for variants, creating a endless market.
  • COVID was used to get the public used to mRNA due to the conflicts of interests they have with a myriad of other drugs that are now in the pipeline.
  • It’s a win-win for profits for Big Pharma as well as the Biosecurity state allowing for the ability to track people’s movements through “vaccination” cards.  It’s also a win for power-brokers like Gates, the Davos crowd, WEF, WHO, and corrupt politicians desiring a mechanism to gain greater biological control over the population, and to be able to give or take away rights on command, naturally leading to eugenics.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

HHS Opens NIH Clinic to Study & Treat the ‘Vaccine’ Injured While New Bill Aims to Strip ‘Vaccine’ Oversight

https://www.hhs.gov/press-room/hhs-strengthens-vaccine-injury-research-reporting-patient-care

HHS Launches Agency-Wide Actions to Strengthen Vaccine Injury Research, Reporting, and Patient Care

WASHINGTON, D.C.—OCTOBER 8, 2026— The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) this week launched a series of actions to strengthen how the federal government identifies, documents, investigates, and responds to health problems reported following vaccination, with a focus on improving patient care and generating better evidence about potential vaccine-related injuries.

To address health problems Americans report after vaccinations, HHS:

  • Opened a new National Institutes of Health (NIH) clinic dedicated to studying and caring for patients experiencing health problems following vaccination;
  • Proposed reimbursing physicians for reporting suspected vaccine-related injuries to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) through a new Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) policy, bringing vaccine reporting in Medicare in line with typical Medicare reimbursement policies;
  • Will require electronic health records to capture vaccine-related adverse events so that information can follow patients across the health care system; and
  • Is modernizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) VAERS to make reporting simpler and improve the tools available to researchers and medical professionals investigating potential safety signals.

“We must listen to patients and families who report vaccine injuries—not dismiss or gaslight them,” said HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “President Trump and I are building a health system that takes them seriously, follows the evidence, and uses what we learn to make vaccines safer. This is how we earn back trust in our public health institutions.”

NIH Opens Clinic for Patient Care and Research

On October 5, NIH opened a new clinic dedicated to studying and caring for patients experiencing health problems following vaccination. HHS and NIH leaders marked the opening with a ribbon-cutting ceremony at NIH’s Bethesda campus.

The clinic brings specialized patient care and scientific investigation together, allowing NIH clinicians and researchers to evaluate patients, study their experiences, investigate potential causes, and identify better approaches to care. By connecting patients directly with clinicians and researchers, NIH will expand access to evaluation and care while advancing scientific understanding of health problems reported following vaccination.

CMS Proposes Reimbursing Physicians for VAERS Reporting

For the first time, CMS has proposed reimbursing physicians for the time they spend submitting reports of suspected vaccine-related injuries to VAERS, bringing vaccine reporting in Medicare in line with typical Medicare reimbursement policies.

VAERS relies on reports from health care professionals, patients, caregivers, vaccine manufacturers, and others to help identify potential vaccine safety concerns. CMS proposes the reimbursement policy to reduce barriers to physician reporting and encourage health care professionals to document suspected adverse events following vaccination.

Electronic Health Records to Capture Vaccine-Related Adverse Events

Federal health information technology standards overseen by the HHS Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology will now require electronic health records to capture vaccine-related adverse events so that this information can follow patients across the health care system.

The requirement will give health care professionals a more complete picture of a patient’s medical history and reduce the need for patients to repeatedly recount the same information when receiving care from different providers.

CDC Modernizing VAERS

CDC is modernizing VAERS to make adverse-event reporting simpler, more accessible, and easier to use.

In August, CDC solicited bids for a new contract to overhaul the system. On September 28, CDC announced a new contract to make VAERS accessible on mobile devices and improve the tools available to researchers and medical professionals investigating potential safety signals. Earlier this year, CDC also added a VAERS QR code to Vaccine Information Statements provided to parents and patients for each vaccine administered.

Together, these Department-wide actions will connect patient care, physician reporting, medical records, clinical research, and federal safety monitoring. They will help HHS better identify and investigate potential vaccine injuries, improve care for patients, and use what it learns to strengthen vaccine safety.

________________

**Comment**

Not to be a ‘Debbie Downer,’ but I’m not expecting much from this. The fact the COVID kill shots are till being pushed tells me everything I need to know.

For more:

________________

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-ultimate-pharma-power-grab-new

The ULTIMATE PHARMA POWER GRAB: New Bill Aims to Strip CDC Oversight and Automate Vaccine Approvals

Del Bigtree sounds the alarm on S.3323, warning that this legislation is an open play for COMPLETE PHARMACEUTICAL CONTROL over every vaccine decision made in America.

Oct. 12, 2026

In this crucial clip from The HighWire, Del Bigtree exposes S.3323, the Family Vaccine Protection Act, a dangerous legislative maneuver designed to hand total power over U.S. vaccine policy directly to pharmaceutical manufacturers.

Under the bill, the CDC director would be stripped of independent oversight, legally required to automatically adopt Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations unless the agency can clear an onerous burden of proof and publish its review.

Additionally, the legislation forces ACIP to fast-track newly licensed vaccines and new indications based strictly on the manufacturer’s timeline.

Bigtree warns that this is a calculated, aggressive play for absolute corporate dominance over our public health programs, and that the public must mobilize to push back immediately.

Source: The HighWire

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines

IMA Calls on Congress to End Regulatory Capture & National Citizens’ Coalition Calls on Scientific Publishers to Correct ‘Misinformation’ Errors

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/ima-after-the-bmj-investigation-congress?

IMA: After The BMJ Investigation, Congress Must Act

After The BMJ investigation, IMA calls on Congress to end regulatory capture with five reforms to fix the vaccine safety failures the probe exposed.

Independent Medical Alliance

Oct 01, 2026

After The BMJ investigation, Congress must act

Did industry capture help silence COVID shot safety warnings? The BMJ’s findings demand an answer from lawmakers.

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), a national coalition of independent physicians, researchers and clinicians, today called on Congress to end the regulatory capture that may have contributed to the COVID vaccine safety failures documented by The BMJ.

The BMJ found that CDC and FDA officials were warned that the data mining tool they relied on to scan vaccine injury reports was blind to signals from the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots. Officials kept the tool and told the FDA scientist who raised the problem to back off. Then they assured the public there were no safety signals.

Pfizer and Moderna had record years. Pfizer’s Comirnaty brought in roughly $37 billion to $38 billion in each of 2021 and 2022. Moderna went from $803 million in revenue in 2020 to more than $18 billion in 2021, almost entirely from Spikevax.

The CDC didn’t run its second promised analysis until 2022. When it did, the analysis flagged myocarditis and other events as safety signals week after week, even as the CDC director publicly described the results as showing nothing unexpected.

Throughout the rollout, the federal government acted as regulator, largest buyer, liability shield, and, with Moderna, development partner. Several senior officials who oversaw these products later took high-paying jobs in the pharmaceutical industry.

“Congress needs to connect the dots and find out exactly where the pressure to overlook this data came from,” said Dr. Joseph Varon, President and Chief Medical Officer of the Independent Medical Alliance. “Frontline doctors, me included, were speaking up about the injuries we were seeing from the COVID shot. They used flawed FDA and CDC data to shut us down.”

IMA is calling on Congress to enact five reforms.

1. Separate the functions. The FDA’s biologics center authorized the mRNA shots and also controlled the safety analysis that could have raised questions about them. The CDC promoted vaccine uptake while co-running VAERS. Post-market vaccine safety should sit in an office that does not answer to the people responsible for vaccination rates, and whose findings cannot be overruled because they might fuel “rhetoric.”

2. Slow the revolving door. Senior officials who personally handled authorization, labeling or safety-signal decisions for a class of products should be barred for a set number of years from taking a paycheck, consulting contract or board seat with any manufacturer of that class. The FDA should also publish an annual accounting of where its departing medical reviewers go.

3. Make safety analyses public from day one. Any emergency product that floods VAERS should automatically trigger at least two pre-specified data mining methods, including one designed to catch effects shared across a product class. Post weekly results to a public docket the same week they’re produced. If a method is known to be insensitive, every official statement that cites it should say so.

4. Protect the scientist who brings bad news. Ana Szarfman was a career FDA officer. She was told to hold off, and when she persisted, to stop. Congress should give federal safety scientists who flag defects in active surveillance systems statutory protection, including a private right of action if they are removed from the work for speaking up.

5. Put practicing physicians in the room. Safety rules that affect every household shouldn’t be written only by people who will never treat the 24-year-old with chest pain. Frontline doctors need a real seat at the table.

“We’re done accepting ‘trust us’ from agencies that kept a broken alarm running and then pointed to the silence,” Varon said. “If they want the public’s trust back, they can start by taking the fox out of the henhouse.”

The BMJ investigation is available at bmj.com. To arrange an interview with one of our doctors, contact Lynne@imahealth.org.

About Dr. Joseph Varon

Dr. Joseph Varon is a critical care physician, professor, and president and chief medical officer of the Independent Medical Alliance. He has authored over 1000 peer-reviewed publications and serves as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Independent Medicine. You can read more of Dr. Varon’s IMA posts here.

For more:

__________________

https://read.sayerji.com/p/correct-the-record-make-accountability?

Peer-Reviewed Misinformation: The Journals That Lent Science’s Authority to a Blacklist

How the “Disinformation Dozen” narrative moved into academic literature—and why major publishers must answer for the claims they published.

Sayer Ji

Oct 08, 2026

An open letter to Springer Nature, ACM, Sage, and The BMJ, exposing discrepancies between their published claims and editorial correction policies—with highlighted policy-versus-passage exhibits and a demand for stronger scientific accountability and the issuance of formal corrections.

Share the X thread for this open letter.

This investigation is part of a broader effort to establish accountability for the use of misinformation designations against identifiable Americans.

In September 2026, we launched Restore the First, a national citizens’ coalition bringing together 20 organizations and eight independent media outlets to address censorship, government accountability, and enforceable protections for First Amendment rights.

The coalition was convened by six Americans named in the original “Disinformation Dozen” report. Our work now extends beyond the conduct of government agencies and technology platforms to a question of scientific accountability: What happens when published research perpetuates inaccurate or unsupported allegations against the very people targeted for censorship?

We are calling on scientific publishers to examine the documented discrepancies, correct consequential errors, and strengthen their correction policies so that no individual is denied an impartial review because of their views or reputation.

The institutions that claim authority to identify misinformation must themselves be accountable for the accuracy of their claims.

The Organization Behind the Blacklist Now Faces Federal Scrutiny

In a striking development, Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate—the organization responsible for the original “Disinformation Dozen” campaign—is now the subject of U.S. government deportation proceedings. In September 2026, a federal district court dismissed his lawsuit challenging the government’s actions, and Ahmed appealed.

Although these immigration proceedings do not constitute a judicial finding that CCDH’s research was false, they place renewed scrutiny on an organization whose allegations helped shape media coverage, government pressure, and subsequent academic publications.

The question for scientific publishers is unavoidable: Did they independently scrutinize CCDH’s evidence before lending their institutional authority to allegations against identifiable Americans?

The credibility of a scientific claim must rest on its evidence—not on the influence or perceived authority of the organization promoting it. (See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

It was recently exposed by MedPage Today that ACIP decisions were “really made” behind closed doors, in violation of FAHA.

The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) requires that advisory committees serving the executive branch operate with strict public transparency, establishing that meetings must generally be open to public attendance and announced in advance via the Federal Register.

For more:

The worst purveyors of ‘misinformation’ for the past six years have been our public ‘health authorities,’ government, science publications, mainstream medicine, the White House, & media, Big Tech, globalists, Big Pharma, and ‘professional’ medical groups.

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Lyme Vaccine Clinical Trials: History Repeating?

https://connecticutcentinal.com/health/2026/06/01/lyme-vaccine-clinical-trials-history-repeating/

Lyme Vaccine Clinical Trials: History Repeating?

By CT Centinal Staff

June 1, 2026

Public Domain.

By Laura Hovind, CEO, TruthCures

Why is there so much controversy surrounding Lyme disease? Why does it seem you can’t get an accurate Lyme disease test?

Article Excerpts:

Lyme disease researcher and renowned expert Dr. Gary Wormser disclosed in a recent publication that he received a research grant “from Pfizer, Inc. for developing Lyme diagnostics for a Lyme vaccine trial.” Evidently the two-tier method that was developed on behalf of a pivotal efficacy trial still isn’t good enough for the latest pivotal efficacy trial.

In the absence of public disclosures or a transparent process, it looks as if Pfizer paid someone to create or validate a test that will make their vaccine appear effective. In light of Pfizer’s recent withdrawal of numerous trial sites affecting nearly half of their U.S. enrollees, this opaque move does not inspire much-needed trust in a next-generation Lyme vaccine. It only raises more questions about the apparent need to customize a diagnostic test for clinical trials, and the expert contracted to carry out the necessary laboratory work.

Why must a new diagnostic standard be developed every time a vaccine enters phase III trials? Why aren’t diagnostics developed, first, to be most accurate for diagnosing real-world patients, then applied to clinical trials? What behind-the-scenes LYMErix history has Pfizer been made privy to, that led them to conclude they needed a new test? And if, in fact, they have developed their own test, why is such a test allowed to be developed in a vacuum, without any oversight, transparency, or adherence to administrative processes and regulations?

The gap between reported Lyme disease cases and estimated actual cases represents more than 90% of the total. Ninety percent or more of the total cases are unable to test positive and receive proper care. So, it seems obvious that the controversy lies not in the over-diagnosis of Lyme, but in the staggering rate of under-diagnosis.

There is no ethical reality in which Pfizer and Valneva can be permitted to continue their trials. The existing, manipulated diagnostic standard misses 90% of cases. An individual and institution paid by Pfizer to develop “Lyme diagnostics for a Lyme vaccine trial” have helped perpetuate the manipulated standard over three decades. Trial subjects are unwittingly facing harm on multiple fronts—from the vaccine formulation itself, to a potential false sense of security, to a complete inability to be accurately diagnosed if symptoms develop.

We’ve been here before. We’ve seen the damage inflicted by the fiasco surrounding LYMErix. We have witnessed widespread medical abuse over the engineered inaccuracy of the tests developed for previous Lyme vaccine trials but foisted on the public. Yet, history is already in the process of repeating—unlikely to be stopped, with only the prior victims speaking up: “We told you.” (See link for entire chronology)

_________________

**Comment**

Hovind does a superb job detailing the long and sordid history.

What’s hard for folks to grasp is that everything is truly build on false premises – testing, diagnosis, and therefore treatment is fundamentally and fraudulently wrong. If you are new to Lymeland I suggest reading: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/25/why-should-we-care-about-lyme-disease-a-colorful-tale-of-government-conflicts-of-interest-probable-bioweaponization-and-pathogen-complexity/ and then https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2026/03/17/why-we-should-care-if-lyme-disease-was-bioengineered/.

For more:

More on the Lyme vaccine:

One of the best articles on the Lyme vaccine was written in 2001 but remains pertinent today: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/02/10/the-bitter-feud-over-lymerix/

Category:

Activism, Lyme, research, Testing, vaccines