Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Alpha-Gal, The Tick Was Always a Needle

https://unfiltered.doctorschierling.com/p/alpha-gal-part-ii-the-tick-was-always?

Alpha-Gal, Part II: The Tick Was Always a Needle

The one question I left standing in Part I — if it was the shots, why the tick at all? The scientific literature answers it in one word. Three questions that collapse the tick story from the inside.

Russell Schierling

Jul 10, 2026

For my children and grandchildren…

In Part I, I built a fence. On one side, I put everything solid — Richet’s Nobel Prize, the route problem, the Japanese gelatin admission, the billing codes, and my own Amish patient base, covered in ticks, completely unvaccinated, and, at least as far as I can ascertain, free of alpha-gal — with a single imported exception I’ll come back to shortly. On the other side, I put my suspicions about a declassed clandestine program, telling you where the record stopped, and my hunches began.

Today, there will be no discussion of Fort Detrick, Plum Island, or other biolabs / bioweapon labs. There’s no need for that when answering a question that several readers asked via the comment section. Before I had finished my morning coffee…

If it’s really the shots that cause alpha-gal, then why is the tick needed at all?

I’m going to answer this by asking and answering three very specific questions from the tick research community’s own filing cabinet — CDC-funded papers and the industry-disclosed authors. From the scientists who are certain the Lone Star tick is the primary cause.

I’m going to let people far smarter than me answer these questions using their own studies…

Question One: Why Is a Tick Needed At All?

But the condition has no historical precedent. It appears in the literature at a specific moment in the late 1980s, in multiple countries simultaneously, at a time when gelatin-containing vaccines were being introduced into childhood immunization schedules worldwide. Japanese researchers documented, confirmed through intervention, and published the direct causal relationship between gelatin-containing DTaP vaccines and alpha-gal sensitization in children who had never been exposed to ticks. That evidence is in the peer-reviewed record. It has been there since 1996. -From Dr Travis Johnson’s June 2 piece in Medium (The Allergy That Shouldn’t Exist: Vaccines, Gelatin, and the Strange Origins of Alpha-Gal Syndrome)

To answer question one, it isn’t — at least not as the origin. Vaccines alone can do it — the tick isn’t required for the mechanism. But historically, before the schedule ballooned, cases clustered in tick country. And the scientific literature already told you why.

Go pull the 2021 paper from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology that tick researchers themselves titled “Tick Saliva and the Alpha-Gal Syndrome: Finding a Needle in a Haystack”. Read that title again. A needle in a haystack. They picked the metaphor, but pointed it at the park instead of at the vial.

Let’s watch what the tick actually does and why the needle in the haystack might be apropos, but maybe not in the way the authors intended…

Another 2021 study, this one on a tick enzyme, describes the alpha-gal sugar as being — their word, not mine — “injected into humans from the lone-star tick bite”. Injected. Not eaten. Not digested. Injected — straight through the skin, past the gut and its digestive processes, and into areas where food is not supposed to be. And as I stated in Part I, this is extremely similar to the phenomenon I have referred to for over two decades as “The Leakies”. Example: (Systemic Leaky Barrier Syndrome (SLBS): A Systems-Level Framework for Chronic Disease).

Earlier studies localized the sugar to the secretory vesicles of the tick’s salivary glands — meaning it’s built to be squirted into a bite. In other words, it’s not wrong to think of ticks as syringes with eight legs — light enough to cross your skin without tripping pressure receptors, and armed with saliva loaded with painkillers, anti-inflammatories, and anticoagulants that let them latch and drink for days without ever setting off the itch that would make you look down and flick them off.

What these devilish little creatures are loading into you is galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose — alpha-gal for short; the “ose” tells you it’s a sugar, like glucose or sucrose — a bit of mammalian sweetness squirted straight under your skin. And here’s the kicker nobody thus far has answered…

When it comes to the animals the tick commonly feeds on — deer, cattle, dogs, rodents, goats, hogs, etc — alpha-gal is “endogenous”. In other words, they build it, they carry it, and their immune systems recognize it as native (“self”) so that it’s not attacked as an invader. So the best answer for why it’s in the saliva at all isn’t that it works some mechanical trick like the anticoagulants and painkillers do — it’s camouflage. Dress your spit in the host’s own sugar, and it reads as ‘self,’ letting the tick guzzle until 100X normal size, all under the immune radar. Which means the sugar is doing exactly its job on a deer. (See link for article)

_____________

**Comment**

Probably the most comprehensive article on the subject and is deserving of your time. I also highly recommend Part 1: Alpha-Gal: Why it Might Be the Shots, Not Just the Ticks. The Amish as a community due to defying government dictates, flourished during COVID as well.

The most important take-away is the fact that the Ozarks are full of deer, lone star ticks, and ‘vaccinated’ people, with the exception of the unvaccinated Amish whom are smack dab in the middle of the same area and free of AGS.

“Geography is an alibi the ‘forced vaccination community’ at large is hiding behind because ticks and the heavily vaccinated live side by side in so much of the country.” ~ Dr. Shierling

The good doctor also states he’s only come into ONE Amish person who got AGS, but that she grew up in Minnesota and received some vaccines as an infant…..

Another important take-away is that the younger the child and the larger the ‘vaccine’ dose(s), the more likely they are to develop sensitivity rather than tolerance. The Journal of the American Dental Association now quietly lists topical numbing gels, Gelfoam, prophy paste, catgut, bone graft materials — while noting manufacturers aren’t required to disclose animal-derived ingredients, as containing alpha-gal bearing excipients. This website has also posted the fact that graphene oxide was found in all three dental anesthetics tested.

For more on AGS:


Category:

Lyme, Testing, Ticks, Treatment, vaccines

Sayer Ji: Idaho Murder Indictment Highlights ‘Institutional Pattern’ of Refusing to Admit that Vaccines Can Lead to Infant Death

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/sayer-ji-idaho-murder-indictment-institutional-pattern-refusing-admit-vaccines-can-cause-infant-death/?

Sayer Ji: Idaho Murder Indictment Highlights ‘Institutional Pattern’ of Refusing to Admit That Vaccines Can Lead to Infant Death

Idaho mother Andrea Shaw is facing murder charges in the deaths of 18-month-old twins because investigators failed to seriously consider a vaccine- and Tylenol-related cause of death, according to health writer Sayer Ji. On his Substack, Ji argued the Shaw case is evidence of a broader institutional refusal to recognize and investigate serious vaccine adverse events.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

July 23, 2026

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.

Tylenol bottles and vaccine bottle

Idaho mother Andrea Shaw is facing murder charges in the deaths of 18-month-old twins because investigators failed to seriously consider a vaccine and Tylenol-related cause of death, according to health writer Sayer Ji.

In a lengthy Substack essay, Ji argued the Shaw case is evidence of a broader institutional refusal to recognize and investigate serious vaccine adverse events.

Eighteen-month-old Dallas and Tyson Shaw received multiple routine childhood vaccinations — including DTaP, flu and hepatitis A vaccines — during an April 2025 pediatric visit.

According to court documents, Andrea and her mother-in-law told the pediatrician that the children’s father had previously experienced an adverse reaction to a flu vaccine. But the pediatrician dismissed their concerns, and a nurse administered the shots.

Within a day, the twins developed fevers, lethargy, difficulty walking, blue lips, sunken eyes and diarrhea. They didn’t want to eat. Emergency department physicians documented a “post-immunization reaction” before discharging the children with instructions to treat their symptoms with children’s Tylenol and popsicles.

Eight days later, both toddlers were found dead. One year later, prosecutors charged Shaw with first-degree murder, a capital offense, and she is being held without bail.

Prosecutors said investigators ruled out other possible causes of death — including heat exposure, carbon monoxide poisoning, poisoning and vaccines. They concluded the only “conceivable explanation” was that the twins were suffocated.

But the unusual nature of the deaths should have prompted a more thorough examination of potential medical causes rather than an assumption of criminal conduct, Ji said.

So far, prosecutors, doctors and other experts have refused to examine all the evidence, according to Ji, who wrote:

“What the state of Idaho refuses to see is that the etiology of these deaths is not obscure, not speculative, and not novel. It is, in fact, the most extensively documented — and most systematically suppressed — pediatric toxicology pattern of the past eighty years. …

“This is not a whodunit. It is a why-won’t-we-look. And it is the inevitable, engineered consequence of a public-health apparatus that has spent forty years insisting — against a mountain of its own peer-reviewed evidence — that all childhood vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ for all children.

“When the medicine kills, the mother must have.”

Other recently vaccinated twins died from SIDS

The prosecutors’ assertion that murder can be the only explanation for why “both would die at the same time, on the same night, in the same room, in the same bed,” is “exactly backwards,” according to Ji.

Case reports dating back to the mid-20th century include eight other cases involving healthy twins who became ill shortly after immunization and died within hours to 10 days.

In a 1946 case, the U.S. Institute of Medicine concluded that the vaccines led to anaphylaxis in one set of twins. In another case, the Institute of Forensic Medicine in Istanbul, Turkey, ruled that twin infants who received vaccines, then became ill and were treated with Tylenol and then suffered simultaneous deaths “consistent with SIDS,” sudden infant death syndrome.

The Shaw twins’ deaths fit a previously observed clinical pattern rather than representing an unprecedented event, he argued.

Possible biological mechanism connecting vaccines and infant death

Vaccines can directly cause infant deaths, including SIDS, through a specific, traceable biological chain, not simply through correlation, Ji said. He laid out three types of evidence:

  • The immune/nervous system pathway: Vaccines trigger an immune response that releases inflammatory molecules known as cytokines. In infants, these molecules can cross into the brain and disrupt a part of the brainstem that controls breathing and the ability to wake up and gasp during oxygen deprivation — the same disruption researchers have found in autopsies of SIDS cases.
  • Specific autopsy findings: Pathologists at the University of Milan examined infants who died shortly after vaccination and found underdeveloped brainstem structures and heart-conduction abnormalities. They argue this shows a physical mechanism related to vaccines, not just developmental abnormalities.
  • Statistical/database signals: Several analyses, including one by von Kries in Germany, an Italian case study series, and Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)-based studies by Goldman and Miller and Miller, report elevated death rates in windows shortly after vaccination and a strong correlation between the number of vaccine doses a country requires and its infant mortality rate.

This evidence offers a solid explanation for vaccine-induced death and would be consistent with the eight-day gap between the Shaw twins’ vaccination and their deaths, Ji said.

“The picture that emerges is not ambiguous. It is a coherent, cross-decade, cross-methodology body of work spanning pathology, epidemiology, VAERS analysis, ecological correlation, and pharmacovigilance signal detection,” he wrote.

Tylenol depletes body’s principal antioxidant defenses

While some researchers have for decades suggested there is a link between vaccines and infant deaths, Ji presents new evidence — not widely discussed until recently — that acetaminophen, or Tylenol, acts as an “amplifier” to the vaccine mechanism that can be deadly for some infants.

The Shaw twins, like many children who experience post-vaccination fevers, were treated with Tylenol on the advice of their doctor.

Drawing on recent work by William Parker, Ph.D., Ji argued that acetaminophen depletes glutathione, one of the body’s principal antioxidant defenses, at the same time that vaccines increase oxidative stress through immune activation.

The combination of vaccination-induced inflammation and acetaminophen-related glutathione depletion created what Ji described as a synergistic toxic reaction capable of damaging vulnerable regions of the brainstem.

He pointed to evidence from a 2008 study, which found that children given acetaminophen after the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine were about eight times more likely to develop autism compared to children given ibuprofen or no analgesic.

A National Institutes of Health-funded study that measured acetaminophen in umbilical cord blood also found infants with higher levels had a 3.6 times greater risk of being diagnosed with autism.

Since the 1980s, physicians have routinely recommended acetaminophen following childhood vaccinations without recognizing what Ji argues are potentially dangerous interactions between the drug and vaccine-induced immune responses.

‘The institutional pattern is not accidental’

The possibility that vaccines could be linked to infant death has been systematically minimized and ignored by public health agencies and the medical establishment, according to Ji.

Decades of published research documenting adverse neurological and inflammatory reactions following vaccination have received little attention because to acknowledge even rare fatal complications would undermine public confidence in vaccination programs, Ji said.

That’s why he believes investigators usually begin with the assumption that vaccines cannot be responsible — which leaves homicide as the only remaining explanation when no obvious other cause is identified.

“The institutional pattern is not accidental,” he wrote. “It is the same governance-by-classification that has characterized every major pharmaceutical harm suppression of the past century — from thalidomide to Vioxx to opioids.”

The elimination in 1979 of medical classification codes that medical examiners can use to classify a death as related to vaccines has institutionalized this practice by effectively eliminating vaccines as a recordable cause of death — even though the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program has continued to recognize the link between vaccines and infant deaths.

It remains unknown whether the coroner in the Shaw case looked for signs of vaccine-induced death in the post-mortem examination. Did the coroner examine each section of the brainstem, look for cytokine expression, examine the cardiac conduction system or measure cerebral glutathione?

The finding of “pulmonary vascular congestion” that prosecutors cited “is consistent with mechanical suffocation — but it is equally consistent with central respiratory arrest from any cause, including vaccine + acetaminophen-induced brainstem failure,” Ji wrote.

‘Entire edifice of universal childhood vaccination as a moral imperative collapses’

Ji compared the Shaw case to several high-profile cases in the United Kingdom, including that of Angela Cannings, whose conviction for murdering her two infant sons in the 1990s was overturned after experts concluded that natural causes couldn’t be ruled out.

The Shaw prosecution similarly relies on statistical assumptions about the improbability of two children dying naturally rather than on definitive forensic evidence demonstrating homicide, Ji said.

Ultimately, Ji frames the Shaw prosecution as more than an isolated criminal case.

He wrote that Andrea “is the predictable output of a public-health information architecture that requires — as a matter of institutional survival — that vaccine deaths not exist.”

Were that fact to be taken seriously, “the entire edifice of universal childhood vaccination as a moral imperative collapses.”

Instead, risk-benefit decisions about whether to receive vaccines would have to be made on a case-by-case basis with full disclosure of the different types of risks. Blanket safety claims would have to be abandoned.

Ji called for a new forensic review to look at evidence of vaccine- and Tylenol-induced death by a pathologist with appropriate expertise. He called for disclosure of the lot numbers of the vaccines the twins received, and a dismissal of Shaw’s murder indictment.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

Related articles in The Defender

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results

https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/2201

Self-Reported Observations of Unusual White Fibrous Structures in Embalmed Corpses: Multi-Year Survey Results from Embalmers in Five Countries, 2022–2025

Thomas F. Haviland*·Laura Kasner·Daniel SantiagoiD

DOI:10.23958/ijirms/vol11-i07/2201· Pages: 204 – 208· Vol. 11, No. 07, (2026)· Published: July 1, 2026

PDFCitationShare

Views: 22,752 PDF downloads: 6,044

Abstract

Background: Beginning in 2020–2021, embalmers in multiple countries reported observing large, tough, rubbery white or off-white fibrous structures in the veins and arteries of embalmed corpses, which they described as distinct from classic postmortem clots.

Methods: We conducted four annual cross-sectional surveys (2022–2025) of active embalmers in the United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand using SurveyMonkey. A dual distribution strategy (professional associations and direct emails to funeral homes) was used. Core questions assessed observation of unusual white fibrous structures and estimated percentage of corpses affected.

Results: Across 808 total responses, the proportion of embalmers reporting observation of these structures ranged from 66% to 83%. Weighted average prevalence in affected corpses ranged from 19% to 27%. The 2022 survey showed a marked increase in first observations beginning in 2020 and accelerating in 2021.

Conclusions: Multiple years of surveys document consistent self-reported observations by experienced embalmers of unusual white fibrous structures in a substantial fraction of corpses, with a clear increase noted around 2020–2021. These findings constitute a potential safety signal that warrants independent investigation by forensic pathologists and biomedical researchers to characterize the structures and determine their etiology.

(Click on top link for full article and pictures)

New White Fibrous Clots Publication

Dr. John Campbell

July 23, 2026

________________

**Comment**

For the ‘science’ skeptics out there, this is what research looks like when no ‘external’ funding or grants are received. Hence the use of SurveyMonkey.

Researchers know that when they study a topic that doesn’t fit the narrative, they are entirely on their own. No large NIH grants should be expected because our government is completely in bed with Big Pharma, who literally couldn’t care less if you live or die.

Lymeland has been in this lovely parallel universe for nigh on 40 years. Any research that moves the needle forward at all is independently funded and since research has become so incredibly expensive, cheap tools like SurveyMonkey are utilized.

In the case of Lyme/MSIDS, it is often called “Big Data,’ and relies on patient surveys. If you haven’t done it already, make sure to fill out the MyLymeData Project which allows patients to pool their health information through a secure website. “Big data” projects use advanced technology to gather and analyze huge amounts of patient data, which can assist researchers in studying disease patterns and answering important questions such as why do some people recover from Lyme disease, while others remain ill?

For more on the clots found in the COVID injected:

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, Inflammation, research, vaccines

Graphene: The Wonder Material They’re Deploying Inside You

https://falkentheater.substack.com/p/graphene-the-wonder-material-theyre?

GRAPHENE: THE WONDER MATERIAL THEY’RE DEPLOYING INSIDE YOU

THE BRAIN IS THE BATTLEFIELD — Article Series : Article 1 of 7

Falken

Mar 07, 2026

What Is Graphene – The 'Wonder Material' Changing Technology but is it harmful? – Waatea News: Māori Radio Station

THE BRAIN IS THE BATTLEFIELD — Article Series : Article 1 of 7

Published as part of the investigative series synthesizing the documented research dossier ‘Homo Chimericus’ (January 2024) — cross-referenced with peer-reviewed literature, EU Commission records, and publicly available institutional documentation.

INTRODUCTION: The Story You Were Told

The story most people know goes like this: graphene is a revolutionary material — a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a hexagonal lattice, first isolated in 2004 at the University of Manchester by Andre Geim and Konstantin Novoselov, who promptly won the 2010 Nobel Prize in Physics for their work. It is the thinnest material ever discovered, yet stronger than steel. It conducts electricity and heat with extraordinary efficiency. It is transparent, flexible, and in theory endlessly useful.

That story is true. But it is also, profoundly and deliberately, incomplete.

What the popular narrative carefully omits is the second, parallel chapter of graphene’s development: the massive, multi-billion-euro program to develop graphene specifically as a biological interface material — to introduce it into the human body, embed it in living tissue, and use it as the foundational substrate of a digital-biological control architecture.

This first article of the series examines graphene’s material properties with precision — not to celebrate them, but to explain exactly why this material was selected for this specific purpose, and what it actually does once it is inside you.

PART 1: What Graphene Actually Is — The Science

The Carbon Lattice

Graphene is a two-dimensional allotrope of carbon — a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a repeating hexagonal pattern, sometimes described as molecular ‘chicken-wire’. At one atom thick, it occupies essentially no physical space in the third dimension. It is the flattest material in existence.

From this minimal structure emerge extraordinary physical properties. Graphene’s electron mobility — the ease with which electrical charge moves through it — reaches approximately 200,000 cm²/V·s at room temperature, far exceeding copper or silicon. Its thermal conductivity reaches 5,000 W/m·K — more than ten times that of copper. Its tensile strength is approximately 130 GPa, making it roughly 200 times stronger than structural steel.

These properties, separately, would already be remarkable. Together, in a material that is biocompatible, flexible, and manufacturable, they become transformative — and, in the wrong hands, something more concerning.

The Graphene Family

Research institutions working on biological graphene deployment draw on a family of related materials, each with distinct properties:

  • Graphene Oxide (GO) — graphene chemically modified with oxygen functional groups. Water-dispersible, and therefore injectable in aqueous solutions. Extensively documented in biomedical delivery research.
  • Reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO) — GO with most oxygen groups removed. More electrically conductive. Used in neural electrode and biosensor applications.
  • Carbon Nanotubes (CNTs) — rolled graphene sheets forming cylindrical structures. Extraordinary tensile strength and electrical conductivity. Can penetrate cell membranes.
  • Graphene Quantum Dots (GQDs) — graphene fragments at nanoscale (sub-10 nm). Highly fluorescent, demonstrably taken up by neurons, and capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier.
  • Graphene Nanoribbons (GNRs) — narrow strips of graphene specifically used as plasmonic nano-antennas resonating in the Terahertz frequency band — the exact band designated for 6G wireless communications.

◆ KEY TECHNICAL POINT:

A graphene nanoribbon of 1 micrometer length and 10–100 nanometer width functions as a plasmonic antenna resonating in the Terahertz band (0.1–10 THz). This is not incidental. It is the structural backbone connecting graphene-based biological materials to 6G telecommunications infrastructure — a convergence explored in depth in Article 2.

PART 2: Graphene in Biological Systems

Blood-Brain Barrier Penetration

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is among the body’s most critical protective filters — a specialized network of endothelial cells that tightly regulates what can pass from the bloodstream into the brain. Most pharmaceutical drugs cannot cross it. Graphene quantum dots, in specific size ranges, can — a fact documented in peer-reviewed animal studies and multiple review papers in journals including ACS Nano and Nature Nanotechnology.

Once inside the brain, graphene materials interact directly with neurons. Research published in Nature Communications documented that graphene substrates in contact with neurons modulate synaptic transmission — altering the frequency and amplitude of neural firing. The mechanism involves graphene’s ability to alter the potassium ion environment at the neuron-material interface, which directly governs electrochemical signaling. (See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

This website has posted material on graphene due to the fact a group of scientists and researchers sued the FDA under a FOIA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID shot. This forced the FDA to reveal the Pfizer COVID shots contain graphene and multiple researchers have shown they are in fact 99% graphene. The article points out that it is also in the following items: ( I highly recommend covidproject which has shown graphene in various applications, including micro-tech in all types of injectables via dark field microscopy)

If graphene is accumulating in the body due to multiple exposure over years, the threshold for achieving functional nano-network density in tissue is lower than a single, identifiable event.

According to Dr. Bryan Ardis, both bee pollen (glucose oxidase, GOD) and apple pectin draw both graphene and aluminum out of the body.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Vaccines NOT Tested Against True Inert Placebo: All 3 Vaccine Technologies Are Fundamentally Unsafe

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/dr-pierre-kory-it-is-a-myth-that?

Dr. Pierre Kory: “It is a Myth That Vaccines Are Safe and Necessary…If I Had Young Children Today, They Would Not Receive a Single Vaccine.”

“…97% of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of vaccination.”

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Jul 21, 2026

Source: Dr. Dawn Michael

Dr. Pierre Kory, MD: “It is a myth that vaccines are safe and necessary.”

“If I had young children today, they would not receive a single vaccine.” Dr. Kory explains that Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) peaks at 2, 4, and 6 months of age — exactly when infants receive multiple routine vaccinations.

He states that the government refuses to perform true placebo-controlled safety trials on vaccines. Unlike other pharmaceuticals, which undergo 2–6 years of rigorous safety testing before FDA/CDC approval, vaccines have never been subjected to the same long-term, robust safety standards.

In clinical trials, safety monitoring for adverse reactions was extremely short:

Hepatitis B vaccine: Tested on only 147 infants/children and monitored for just 5 days before approval.

Hepatitis A vaccine: Monitored for 14 days.

Meningococcal (meningitis) vaccine: Monitored for 7 days.

Prevnar (pneumococcal) vaccine: Monitored for 7 days.

MMR vaccine: Followed for 42 days.

RSV vaccine: Monitored for 30 days.

DTaP / Tdap vaccines: Monitored for 14 days.

Gardasil (HPV) vaccine: Monitored for 14 days.

Crucially, no childhood vaccine has ever been tested against a true inert saline placebo. Trial “placebos” have instead used aluminum adjuvants or other vaccines:

Gardasil trial → placebo was Hepatitis A vaccine + aluminum adjuvant

Hepatitis A trial → placebo was Hepatitis B vaccine

Influenza trial → placebo was the other flu strain vaccine

Meningitis trial → placebo was DTaP

Pertussis trial → placebo was Tetanus + Diphtheria

Polio trial → placebo was diluted polio vaccine

Vaxelis (6-in-1) trial → placebo was DTaP + Polio + Hib + Hep B

Hepatitis B trial → placebo was aluminum adjuvant alone

Dr. Kory notes that countries with the most vaccines on their infant schedules have the highest infant mortality rates.

The United States gives more infant vaccines than any other industrialized nation — and has the highest infant mortality rate among them.

He further states that 97% of SIDS deaths occur within 7 days of vaccination.

(Click on top link for video with Dr. Kory)

_________________

https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/urgent-warning-from-bret-weinstein

URGENT WARNING from Bret Weinstein: ALL 3 Vaccine Technologies Are Fundamentally UNSAFE. NONE Are Safe.

The era of “safe and effective” blanket claims is over. Every vaccine technology has built-in mechanisms that harm you.

Lioness of Judah Ministry

Jul 15, 2026

Source: Valerie Anne Smith

Bret Weinstein: Every single vaccine carries severe, built-in dangers:

  1. Live Attenuated Vaccines: They can cause long-term immune compromise. Your body’s natural defenses get damaged over time.
  2. Inactivated Vaccines: They leave lingering toxins behind in your system. These don’t just disappear.
  3. mRNA Vaccines: Your own cells are turned into factories that keep producing spike protein — with all its toxic effects — long after the shot.

Weinstein’s direct conclusion: “None are fundamentally safe. They all have severe downsides.”

This isn’t theory.

This is the reality of how these technologies actually work inside the human body.

The era of “safe and effective” blanket claims is over.

Every vaccine technology has built-in mechanisms that harm you. Do your own research. Protect yourself and your family.

(Click on top link for video with Dr. Weinstein)

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines