Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

ACTION: Sign the Open Letter To Remove the mRNA Platform

According to journalist Jon Fleetwood, the letter has surpassed 3,300 signatures. Let’s get that number up. Add your name today.

https://americansforhealthfreedom.org/letter-to-kennedy

Open letter · September 18, 2026

Open Letter Regarding the Removal of the mRNA Platform

Addressed to Secretary Kennedy and President Trump by Americans for Health Freedom and the listed signatories.

An open letter demanding that President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. remove mRNA vaccines from the market has surpassed 3,300 signatures, according to Dr. Mary Talley Bowden.

Today, Dr. Bowden confirmed to JonFleetwood.com that the letter had collected 3,397 signatures as of her latest count.

The signatories reportedly have a combined social media following of more than 66 million.

Published September 18 by Americans for Health Freedom, the letter challenges the Trump administration over its failure to deliver on a central demand of the Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) movement: removing mRNA products from the market.

Doctors, scientists, legislators, and other public officials have signed a letter calling for greater transparency, independent investigation, and accountability over unresolved questions surrounding COVID-19 vaccine safety and efficacy.

You can sign the letter here.

________________

**Comment**

Do not worry if you aren’t a doctor, researcher, or PhD – sign it anyway.

The dangerous mRNA platform concerns everyone and should include everyone’s input. Future generations depend upon our action. It should concern us greatly that within 72 hours of a Siberian lab worker dying without a plague diagnosis, vaccine stocks shot up 20%, proving a fear narrative and countermeasure economy are fully built and waiting to be set in motion at any time by an unresolved death, long before any evidence.

The CDC literally changed the definition of vaccine so that mRNA fit the category. Comparing old and new versions of what they posted on their website, here was the definition on the CDC website in 2020:

Vaccines contain the same germs that cause disease . . . But they have been killed or weakened to the point that they don’t make you sick.

The new version became much more general, to include mRNA. Here is the current definition on the CDC website:

A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.

Many points stated are inaccurate at best. For instance, many become ill after vaccination. In fact, many become ill with the actual disease they are vaccinating for.

We’ve since learned the dangerous and ineffective COVID gene therapy was developed by the military and was passed by the FDA by ignoring data and by bypassing passing the advisory panel. It has ZERO to do with health. The White House orchestrated a cover-up of heart damage caused by the injections and U.S. officials knew the safety system was flawed and ignored the FDA doctor who alerted them.

SUMMARY:

  • Using the genetic code of COVID, a mRNA strand is constructed to create a specific protein
  • Gene therapy doesn’t work for long, requiring multiple doses and perfect conditions in the body
  • Never before have human cells been hijacked to create something that is supposed to attack the body
  • Overnight this technology used on a minority with particular deficiencies, was used on everyone to combat a virus
  • This gene therapy acts as a Trojan Horse by moving into cells to create a portion of the virus known as the spike protein
  • This important article explains that this Trojan Horse does NOT actually contain mRNA which is short-lived, but rather modified RNA (“modRNA”) which is developed for longevity which will disrupt and block cell metabolism and be incorporated into the human genome
  • It is asinine to expect the mRNA platform to work like a traditional vaccine
  • It doesn’t work against variants which is called original antigenic sin
  • The ‘powers that be’ knew the shots wouldn’t give you lasting immunity and probably wouldn’t work on variants.
  • They had no idea of side effects as it has never been used to create an antigen.
  • Founded in 2010, Moderna never talked about vaccines – only therapeutics and they never made any money at all.
  • High-ranking officials in the FDA and CDC have financial conflicts of interests with Moderna and Pfizer.
  • It’s called a “platform” for drug delivery because new drugs are needed for variants, creating a endless market.
  • COVID was used to get the public used to mRNA due to the conflicts of interests they have with a myriad of other drugs that are now in the pipeline.
  • It’s a win-win for profits for Big Pharma as well as the Biosecurity state allowing for the ability to track people’s movements through “vaccination” cards.  It’s also a win for power-brokers like Gates, the Davos crowd, WEF, WHO, and corrupt politicians desiring a mechanism to gain greater biological control over the population, and to be able to give or take away rights on command, naturally leading to eugenics.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

IMA Calls on Congress to End Regulatory Capture & National Citizens’ Coalition Calls on Scientific Publishers to Correct ‘Misinformation’ Errors

https://imahealth.substack.com/p/ima-after-the-bmj-investigation-congress?

IMA: After The BMJ Investigation, Congress Must Act

After The BMJ investigation, IMA calls on Congress to end regulatory capture with five reforms to fix the vaccine safety failures the probe exposed.

Independent Medical Alliance

Oct 01, 2026

After The BMJ investigation, Congress must act

Did industry capture help silence COVID shot safety warnings? The BMJ’s findings demand an answer from lawmakers.

The Independent Medical Alliance (IMA), a national coalition of independent physicians, researchers and clinicians, today called on Congress to end the regulatory capture that may have contributed to the COVID vaccine safety failures documented by The BMJ.

The BMJ found that CDC and FDA officials were warned that the data mining tool they relied on to scan vaccine injury reports was blind to signals from the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA shots. Officials kept the tool and told the FDA scientist who raised the problem to back off. Then they assured the public there were no safety signals.

Pfizer and Moderna had record years. Pfizer’s Comirnaty brought in roughly $37 billion to $38 billion in each of 2021 and 2022. Moderna went from $803 million in revenue in 2020 to more than $18 billion in 2021, almost entirely from Spikevax.

The CDC didn’t run its second promised analysis until 2022. When it did, the analysis flagged myocarditis and other events as safety signals week after week, even as the CDC director publicly described the results as showing nothing unexpected.

Throughout the rollout, the federal government acted as regulator, largest buyer, liability shield, and, with Moderna, development partner. Several senior officials who oversaw these products later took high-paying jobs in the pharmaceutical industry.

“Congress needs to connect the dots and find out exactly where the pressure to overlook this data came from,” said Dr. Joseph Varon, President and Chief Medical Officer of the Independent Medical Alliance. “Frontline doctors, me included, were speaking up about the injuries we were seeing from the COVID shot. They used flawed FDA and CDC data to shut us down.”

IMA is calling on Congress to enact five reforms.

1. Separate the functions. The FDA’s biologics center authorized the mRNA shots and also controlled the safety analysis that could have raised questions about them. The CDC promoted vaccine uptake while co-running VAERS. Post-market vaccine safety should sit in an office that does not answer to the people responsible for vaccination rates, and whose findings cannot be overruled because they might fuel “rhetoric.”

2. Slow the revolving door. Senior officials who personally handled authorization, labeling or safety-signal decisions for a class of products should be barred for a set number of years from taking a paycheck, consulting contract or board seat with any manufacturer of that class. The FDA should also publish an annual accounting of where its departing medical reviewers go.

3. Make safety analyses public from day one. Any emergency product that floods VAERS should automatically trigger at least two pre-specified data mining methods, including one designed to catch effects shared across a product class. Post weekly results to a public docket the same week they’re produced. If a method is known to be insensitive, every official statement that cites it should say so.

4. Protect the scientist who brings bad news. Ana Szarfman was a career FDA officer. She was told to hold off, and when she persisted, to stop. Congress should give federal safety scientists who flag defects in active surveillance systems statutory protection, including a private right of action if they are removed from the work for speaking up.

5. Put practicing physicians in the room. Safety rules that affect every household shouldn’t be written only by people who will never treat the 24-year-old with chest pain. Frontline doctors need a real seat at the table.

“We’re done accepting ‘trust us’ from agencies that kept a broken alarm running and then pointed to the silence,” Varon said. “If they want the public’s trust back, they can start by taking the fox out of the henhouse.”

The BMJ investigation is available at bmj.com. To arrange an interview with one of our doctors, contact Lynne@imahealth.org.

About Dr. Joseph Varon

Dr. Joseph Varon is a critical care physician, professor, and president and chief medical officer of the Independent Medical Alliance. He has authored over 1000 peer-reviewed publications and serves as editor-in-chief of the Journal of Independent Medicine. You can read more of Dr. Varon’s IMA posts here.

For more:

__________________

https://read.sayerji.com/p/correct-the-record-make-accountability?

Peer-Reviewed Misinformation: The Journals That Lent Science’s Authority to a Blacklist

How the “Disinformation Dozen” narrative moved into academic literature—and why major publishers must answer for the claims they published.

Sayer Ji

Oct 08, 2026

An open letter to Springer Nature, ACM, Sage, and The BMJ, exposing discrepancies between their published claims and editorial correction policies—with highlighted policy-versus-passage exhibits and a demand for stronger scientific accountability and the issuance of formal corrections.

Share the X thread for this open letter.

This investigation is part of a broader effort to establish accountability for the use of misinformation designations against identifiable Americans.

In September 2026, we launched Restore the First, a national citizens’ coalition bringing together 20 organizations and eight independent media outlets to address censorship, government accountability, and enforceable protections for First Amendment rights.

The coalition was convened by six Americans named in the original “Disinformation Dozen” report. Our work now extends beyond the conduct of government agencies and technology platforms to a question of scientific accountability: What happens when published research perpetuates inaccurate or unsupported allegations against the very people targeted for censorship?

We are calling on scientific publishers to examine the documented discrepancies, correct consequential errors, and strengthen their correction policies so that no individual is denied an impartial review because of their views or reputation.

The institutions that claim authority to identify misinformation must themselves be accountable for the accuracy of their claims.

The Organization Behind the Blacklist Now Faces Federal Scrutiny

In a striking development, Imran Ahmed, CEO of the Center for Countering Digital Hate—the organization responsible for the original “Disinformation Dozen” campaign—is now the subject of U.S. government deportation proceedings. In September 2026, a federal district court dismissed his lawsuit challenging the government’s actions, and Ahmed appealed.

Although these immigration proceedings do not constitute a judicial finding that CCDH’s research was false, they place renewed scrutiny on an organization whose allegations helped shape media coverage, government pressure, and subsequent academic publications.

The question for scientific publishers is unavoidable: Did they independently scrutinize CCDH’s evidence before lending their institutional authority to allegations against identifiable Americans?

The credibility of a scientific claim must rest on its evidence—not on the influence or perceived authority of the organization promoting it. (See link for article)

______________

**Comment**

It was recently exposed by MedPage Today that ACIP decisions were “really made” behind closed doors, in violation of FAHA.

The Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) requires that advisory committees serving the executive branch operate with strict public transparency, establishing that meetings must generally be open to public attendance and announced in advance via the Federal Register.

For more:

The worst purveyors of ‘misinformation’ for the past six years have been our public ‘health authorities,’ government, science publications, mainstream medicine, the White House, & media, Big Tech, globalists, Big Pharma, and ‘professional’ medical groups.

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Vaxxed vs Unvaxxed Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in COVID Jabbed Children

Please remember, the COVID injections are NOT vaccines. They are a gene therapy developed by the military that have never protected against infection or transmission. They weren’t even tested for reduction in hospitalization, death, or transmission. They were tested for reduction in severe symptoms – which is not the proper endpoint for “vaccine” efficacy. The public, which has served as subjects in an ongoing clinical trial for an experimental mRNA platform never before used in humans, that scientists have admitted have toxicity risks, is suffering from catastrophic injuries and death, but ‘the powers that be’ simply target those for speaking the truth: the COVID shots are killing people.

https://zenodo.org/records/23165256

Published October 5, 2026 | Version v1

Preprint Open

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in COVID-19-Vaccinated Versus Unvaccinated U.S. Children: Analysis of the National Health Interview Survey, 2022–2024

Authors/Creators
Description
Abstract

Background: Autism spectrum disorder now affects 1 in 31 U.S. 8-year-olds and continues to rise at an alarming rate. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were first authorized for U.S. children aged 12–15 in May 2021, 5–11 in October 2021, and 6 months–4 years in June 2022. No pediatric trial or post-marketing surveillance study was designed or powered to detect neurodevelopmental or mental-health outcomes after childhood COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Vaccine-derived spike protein circulates systemically after vaccination and has been detected in blood, monocytes, cerebral arteries, and peripheral tissue months to years later, the S1 subunit disrupts blood–brain-barrier integrity in vitro, and prenatal spike-protein exposure induces autism-like behavior, neuroinflammation, and reduced BDNF in male rats. A population-level signal-detection analysis is warranted.

Methods: We pooled the 2022–2024 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) Sample Child files (n = 21,990 children aged 0–17 with COVID-19 vaccination status; n = 19,882 aged 2–17 for autism, ADHD, and learning-disability items; 844 lifetime and 779 current ASD cases), with the 2021 (ages 12–17) and 2025 (current-season dose) files as supplementary samples. The primary comparison was COVID-19-vaccinated versus COVID-19-unvaccinated children (parental report of ever receiving a COVID-19 vaccine; “unvaccinated” denotes no COVID-19 vaccine, not absence of routine childhood immunization), with number of doses and years since first dose as secondary exposures. Outcomes were parent-reported lifetime and current autism spectrum disorder (ASD), ADHD, learning disability, intellectual disability, developmental delay, special-education use, asthma, diabetes, anxiety and depression frequency, mental-health treatment, general health, and acute-care use. Influenza and HPV vaccination served as negative-control exposures. Survey-weighted logistic regression with stratum/PSU Taylor-linearized variance estimated odds ratios (ORs) across five adjustment tiers.

Results: Compared with unvaccinated children, COVID-19-vaccinated children had higher adjusted odds of lifetime ASD (aOR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04–1.52), current ASD (1.32, 1.08–1.60), ADHD (1.33, 1.18–1.49), any neurodevelopmental diagnosis (1.23, 1.12–1.35), special-education use (1.19, 1.08–1.31), asthma (1.24, 1.11–1.37), daily/weekly anxiety (1.27, 1.15–1.42), and mental-health medication (1.57, 1.38–1.77) and therapy (1.60, 1.43–1.79); the E-value for current ASD was 1.97, and no measured covariate was associated with both vaccination and autism in the same direction at this magnitude. Adjusted odds rose monotonically with dose count (current ASD 1.03, 1.25, 1.40 for 1, 2, ≥3 doses vs 0). The association (current ASD) was largest in the youngest exposed cohort: ≥3 doses vs 0 at ages 5–7, aOR 2.54 (1.33–4.84); ages 2–7, 2.37 (1.38–4.10); and among children first vaccinated at age ≤5 at least one year before interview, 2.46 (1.08–5.62; 9 exposed cases). Under propensity-score overlap weighting, which eliminated all measured covariate imbalance, the autism association was unchanged and remained significant (lifetime 1.23, 1.01–1.50; current 1.26, 1.03–1.56), while the negative-control outcomes of emergency-department visits and hospitalization were close to the null (0.95 and 1.02). Estimates were unchanged after restriction to children without asthma, diabetes, or fair/poor health (n = 16,803; both vaccines vs neither, 1.51, 1.17–1.95), and persisted after additional adjustment for emergency-department use, hospitalization, and prescription use (1.31, 1.04–1.66). In direct comparison, COVID-19-vaccine-only children (n = 3,205) had higher odds of ASD than influenza-vaccine-only children (n = 3,763; 1.45, 1.03–2.05) despite lower odds of asthma (0.73) and emergency-department visits (0.77). Anxiety showed partial specificity (COVID-19 vaccine 1.34 vs influenza vaccine 1.07 at ages 5–11). Against the unvaccinated reference; however, influenza-vaccine-only and COVID-19-vaccine-only, point estimates were similar and modest (1.11 and 1.12) for ASD. Likewise, HPV vaccination was modestly associated with ASD 1.17 (0.74–1.85). The ASD association was amplified among children receiving both (influenza and COVID-19) vaccines (1.42–1.51). Associations for current ASD weakened with time since first dose, and the COVID-19 vaccine association was confined to girls (1.60 vs boys 1.08; interaction p = 0.02).

Conclusions: In a direct comparison of COVID-19-vaccinated with unvaccinated children in a nationally representative U.S. sample, COVID-19 vaccination was associated with higher adjusted odds of autism, ADHD, anxiety, special-education use, and mental-health treatment. The autism association persisted across every adjustment tier; was unchanged under propensity-score balancing that removed all measured covariate imbalance and nullified the acute-care negative controls; was robust to restriction to physically healthy children; increased monotonically with dose count; was largest in the youngest exposed cohorts, including children vaccinated before the school-entry diagnostic window; and exceeded that of influenza vaccination in direct comparison. These properties satisfy the strength, consistency, biological gradient, plausibility, and coherence considerations for causal inference, and no measured confounder explains them. Because the cross-sectional design cannot order exposure and diagnosis, a global scheduled combination childhood vaccine effect on neurodevelopment cannot be evaluated. A linked birth-cohort study of toddlers before age 3 capturing co-administered vaccines, incident diagnoses, and pre-specified negative controls would be the next step in evaluating this concerning association. (See link for full study)

__________________

**Comment**

For more:

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines, Viruses

October DOJ Report Exposing the Existing Machine to Treat You As A Terrorist Threat

**UPDATE**

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) states in its September 9, 2026, shutdown contingency plan that its pandemic preparedness agency will suspend Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) execution and congressionally mandated preparedness evaluations while continuing to negotiate, award, and manage biodefense contracts. You can contact HHS here.

https://read.sayerji.com/p/they-built-a-machine-to-treat-you?

They Built a Machine to Treat You as a Terrorist Threat. The Justice Department Just Published the Blueprints.

Five years ago I warned that the government was preparing to treat people who questioned COVID policy as a domestic-terror problem. The receipts are in.

Sayer Ji

Oct. 8, 2026

Empty school board meeting room with rows of folding chairs and a lectern
Five years ago I warned that the government was preparing to treat people who questioned COVID policy as a domestic-terror problem. A 273-page DOJ report, released October 5, 2026, now shows exactly how it was done, who was targeted, and why it should matter to every reader of this newsletter.

On August 13, 2021, the Department of Homeland Security issued a terrorism bulletin that listed “grievances over public health safety measures and perceived government restrictions” among the drivers of domestic terrorism, and promised to “identify and evaluate” online activity “associated with the spread of disinformation, conspiracy theories, and false narratives.”

The next day I published a piece on GreenMedInfo saying plainly what the bulletin implied: that people who questioned, resisted, or disobeyed COVID restrictions, or who questioned the vaccines, were being moved into the category of potential domestic terrorists. I wrote that the people being described this way were mostly mothers and fathers, many with vaccine-injured children, who were questioning the medical system for the first time in their lives.

I was told that was paranoid. And that I was a “super-spreader” of dangerous misinformation.

On October 5, 2026, the Department of Justice released a report by its Weaponization Working Group, with 250 pages of internal emails attached, showing what happened in the ten weeks after that bulletin. I have reviewed all 273 pages. This is what they say, in plain language, and what it means for you.

The machine is not partisan and it is not gone. Tip portals, threat tags, private “NGO reporting” contracts, and counter-misinformation offices are infrastructure. They outlive the administration that built them. The only reason we can read these emails is that one administration chose to release documents about the previous one. The next one can choose otherwise. (See link for chronology as well as steps that need to be taken)

________________

**Comment**

Ji says the following steps are crucial so history doesn’t repeat itself:

  • Extend the file review and apology process to ANYONE whose name is on the ‘naughty’ list.
  • Release the communications.
  • Make it illegal to rebuild. The Senate Commerce Committee has already advanced S. 4749, the JAWBONE Act, which would bar federal officials from coercing platforms to suppress lawful speech. Call your senators and ask them to pass it. Then ask your representative for a House companion. Restore the First, has scripts and a lookup tool.
  • Join Stand For Health freedom and take action with their advocacy tools. And share the platform widely with those you know who are.
  • Pre-order Ji’s upcoming investigative book, Shadow Empire: The Epstein Files, to educate yourself on how the systems of power that operate with impunity expose themselves in the 3.5 million document release from Jan. of this year. Ji recently reported on Epstein’s plan to create a “Mother’s Army” to target their children for vaccination directly. The truth must get out.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Splitting Up the Combination Vaccines

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2026/09/splitting-up-the-combination-vaccines/

Splitting Up the Combination Vaccines

by Marco Cáceres

Published September 28, 2026

Opinion

Splitting Up the Combination Vaccines

President Trump announced on Sept. 18, 2026 that his administration plans to recommend that certain childhood vaccines be split up into separate shots. The policy proposal is apparently a follow-up to an Executive Order the President signed on Aug. 10 that calls for recommending the number of diseases for which children should be vaccinated be reduced from 17 to 11, including measles, mumps, rubella, diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type B, pneumococcal disease, human papillomavirus, and varicella.1 2 3 Trump said:

Instead of a child going in and having a tremendous amount of different vaccines pumped into a big proportion of the body … we’re going to recommend that they do five doses marked one, two, three, four, five and that they be given in six-month intervals, so that a small amount of the vaccine gets pumped into the body.1 2

MMR Could Be First to Be Targeted

A likely combination vaccine that could be separated into individual shots would be the live attenuated MMR vaccine, a three and four-vaccine combo shot in the form of the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) and MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella) vaccines.

Last month’s Executive Order actually specified that the MMR vaccine be broken up and be administered as separate shots. The MMR, either Merck’s M-M-R II product or GSK’s Priorix, are recommended for children 12-15 months old (first dose) and 4-6 years old (second dose). Breaking up the vaccine would mean giving three shots (one each for measles, mumps, and rubella) instead of one combo shot for the first dose and three shots again instead of the combination MMR shot for the second dose.3 4

There is another combo shot on the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) childhood vaccination schedule—the DTaP (diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis). There are two DTaP combo vaccines licensed in the United States—Sanofi Pasteur’s Daptacel and GSK’s Infanrix. The DTaP shot is recommended to be given five times. The first shot at two months of age, the second at four months, the third at six months, the fourth between 15 and18 months, and the fifth between 4 and 6 years. Breaking up the vaccine would mean, again, giving three shots (one each for diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) instead of one combo shot for each of the five doses.5 6 7 8

There are five other combo vaccines licensed in the U.S. that include the DTaP—Kinrix, Quadracel, Pediarix, Pentacel, and Vaxelis. GSK’s Kinrix and Sanofi Pasteur’s Quadracel each add the inactivated poliovirus vaccine to make them four-vaccine combos. GSK’s Pediarix adds the hepatitis B and inactivated poliovirus vaccines, making it a five-vaccine combo. Sanofi Pasteur’s Pentacel adds the inactivated poliovirus and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines for another five-vaccine combo. Lastly, Merck/Sanofi Pasteur’s Vaxelis adds the inactivated poliovirus, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines for a whopping six-vaccine combo.9

There is also the Tdap (tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccine), and one dose is recommended for children between 11-12 years old.10

Safety of Combo Vaccines a Concern

Combination vaccines, particularly the combination diptheria-tetanus-pertussis and measles-mumps-rubella vaccines have been used for decades since the mid-20th century. If vaccine manufacturers agree to produce separate vaccines and the CDC officially recommends their use, this policy shift would represent a major reversal in the growing trend toward the development of more and more combo shots containing multiple vaccines.

An article by guest writer Sheri Marino republished in The Vaccine Reaction noted, “While the CDC suggests that combination vaccines are safe, research shows there are more adverse events, such as febrile seizures, with combination vaccines than there are for single vaccines.” Marino added, “Research published in the New England Journal of Medicine revealed a significantly elevated risk of febrile seizures 8 to 14 days after administration of the MMR vaccine.”11

Marino continued:

According to the CDC, pre-licensing data obtained from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, reveals the MMRV vaccine shows recipients were twice as likely to have febrile seizures than those injected with the MMR and Varicella vaccines separately. Another study conducted in Denmark published in the Journal of American Medical Association demonstrated that the 5 valent DTaP-IPV-HIB vaccine has been linked with increased febrile seizures.11

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses