Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Did We Win Against the WHO?

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/interview/who-updates/

Did we win against the WHO?

WHO treaty and IHR update after WHA 75

​In the last few weeks, health advocates in the U.S. have seen massive wins in our stand against the rapid and coercive development of a global health governance. Thanks to your efforts to sound the alarm, the U.S. Congress has come alive with new bills, new sponsors on existing bills, and letters from the House and the Senate reminding the president that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and no international agreement will push that aside.

So where are we now with the global health agenda? Read on for updates to the U.S. involvement with the World Health Organization so you can keep the momentum going!

What happened with the proposed US IHR amendments?

In January 2022, the United States, along with approximately 40 other countries, proposed amendments to 13 articles of the existing WHO International Health Regulations.[i] At WHA 75 in Geneva from May 22 through 28, 2022,[ii] the Assembly adopted a resolution to substantially amend one article of the International Health Regulations regarding timelines for amendments to the IHR, along with “necessary” changes to four additional articles to reinforce those major changes. Member States of the World Health Organization will have the opportunity to reject or accept the amendments with reservations (explained below). The other 12 amendments proposed by the U.S. are not off the table — these will now be addressed by the new Working Group on IHR Amendments which will report to the World Health Assembly in 2024, the same year the pandemic treaty is planned to be voted on.

The final version of the amendment was negotiated in “informal discussions” outside of the WHA meetings. U.S. Deputy Secretary Colin McIff of the HHS Office of Global Affairs explained on the record that, “Member States decided to commence a Member-State led process to consider proposed amendments2 to the International Health Regulations (2005) beyond those adopted below.” [iii] That footnote you see mid-sentence is in a WHA document and refers to the 12 proposed amendments rumored to be withdrawn. It refers to “Including the other proposed amendments set out in the annex of Document A75/18, as well as other amendments which have or may be submitted by other IHR (2005) States Parties or the Director-General, including through the above-mentioned Member State-led process.” (emphasis added) Document A75/18 includes the amendments as submitted by the U.S. to the WHO. So not only are all of the U.S. amendments still proposed for consideration, more amendments from other Member States are invited as well.

Details on the adopted amendment

The amendment adopted at the WHA to Article 59: Entry into force; period for rejection or reservations, regarding the timeline for new amendments to the IHR to be adopted and become legally binding on Member States was the one never thought to be withdrawn.

The U.S. wanted to reduce the timeline for adoption of new amendments from a 2-year process to a 6-month process. Right now, after notification of an adopted amendment, countries have 18 months to reject or make reservations, and an additional 6 months before those amendments go into force. The proposal adopted by WHA 75 decreases that timeline to 10 months instead of 18 months to reject or reserve, and two additional months for effect, shortening the entire timeline by a year.

Amendment to Section 59 adopted by the Assembly,[iv] along with additional language changes to Articles 55, 61, 62, 63, having to do with the amendment process, rejections and reservations, and the timeline for amendments to go into force was proposed to reinforce the changes proposed to Article 59. These additional articles were not in the original U.S. proposal but were deemed necessary after informal negotiations.[v]

Throughout the Assembly, countries voiced opposition to, or concern with, changes to WHO authority and reach by way of amending the IHR and creating a new pandemic treaty. Notably, Brazil President Jair Bolsanaro stated Brazil would have no part of a pandemic treaty[vi] (and has been on record since 2020 considering leaving the WHO entirely[vii]). Other countries expressing concern included Botswana, Iran, Bangladesh, Namibia, India, Brunei, the Russian Federation,[viii] and several African states.[ix]

What to watch for now?

Health Advocates can keep an eye on the WHO process through 2024, but pay attention to what is happening in the WHO’s backyard which will eventually come knocking.

WHA created two new WHO groups to work on IHR changes.

The Assembly agreed to the creation of two new groups in the WHO to work on updating the IHR. The Working Group on IHR Regulations (WGIHR) will meet over the next two years to collect, discuss, and propose “targeted” amendments to the IHR at the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024.[x] The WGIHR will be helped by a new IHR Review Committee to focus on “technical recommendations” (changes that are not considered substantial enough to be amendments but bring the IHR in line with amendments and goals for strengthening the WHO).

The WGIHR must coordinate with the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), “as both the International Health Regulations (2005) and the new instrument are expected to play central roles in pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response in the future.”[xi]

Timeline as of June 1, 2022 (all subject to change)

  • TBD – Official notice from the WHO Director-General of adoption of resolution to amend Articles 59, 55, 61, 62 and 63 of the IHR, which starts the clock ticking for reservations or rejections
  • TBD — Member States must reject or take reservation. By law, States should have 18 months, per the existing and legally binding regulations in force now. Some wonder, however, if the DG will impose the newly adopted timeline even though it is not yet in force. (In other words, the U.S. will have 10 to 18 months to respond to the amendments.)
  • June 16-17 — Second meeting of INB to inform drafting of pandemic treaty[xii]
  • August 2022 — First draft of pandemic treaty expected
  • September 30, 2022 — Deadline for proposed amendments to IHR
  • October 1, 2022 — Deadline for creation of IHR Review Committee for technical recommendations to proposed amendments and to inform the work of the WGIHR
  • November 15, 2022 — Deadline for first meeting of WGIHR
  • January 15, 2023 — Requested deadline for IHR Review Committee to submit a report to the DG, who will transfer it to the WGIHR immediately
  • May 2023 — World Health Assembly 76
  • May 2024 — World Health Assembly 77 to consider targeted amendments to IHR as well as pandemic treaty.

The IHR and treaty are not the only way to move a global health agenda forward.

Outside of these documents, meetings, and negotiations, there are other agreements strategically being put into place. The World Bank is setting up accounts for a new global health security fund for pandemic preparedness, which already has over $3.2 billion pledged by countries around the globe.[xiii] The WHO opened a new global hub for pandemic and epidemic intelligence in Germany for “data, surveillance, and analytics innovation…the largest network of global data to predict, prevent, detect, prepare for, and respond to pandemic and epidemic risks worldwide.”[xiv] The WHO also has ongoing research, pilot programs, and guidance regarding digital documentation of COVID-19 tests and vaccination certificates.[xv] Switzerland is home to the new WHO BioHub where countries can rapidly share novel biological materials and pathogens.[xvi] Negotiations to share intellectual property (patent rights) for pandemic medical products have been ongoing at the World Trade Organization.[xvii] Right now all of these agreements and negotiations are voluntary, but all of these issues are expected to be addressed and become legally binding through the pandemic treaty.

In America there are state and federal laws, bills, and regulations either aligning with or rejecting the WHO. Stand for Health Freedom already reported on the 2017 CDC quarantine regulation updates that included the WHO definition of public health emergency.[xviii] State legislatures started seeing bills referencing WHO definitions as well, including the Mental Health Parity Act that did not pass the Georgia House this past session.[xix] The Biden administration created an Office of Climate Change and Health Equity in 2021, [xx] and added to it an Office of Environmental Justice, within the Health and Human Services agency. [xxi] This new creation is in line with the “One Health” approach of the WHO for the new pandemic treaty, which includes humans, animals, and the environment together in public health.

Here’s the great news.

Americans have seen lawmakers wake up and start opposing WHO takeover of U.S. public health decisions.

Since the launch of the SHF action to support HR 419, No Taxpayer Funding for the WHO Act, there have been 39 new cosponsors! Two senators[xxii] as well as House members of the Freedom Caucus[xxiii] sent letters to the White House insisting the U.S. reform their relationship with the WHO or pull out altogether. Some representatives have been making public statements against WHO involvement, like Mary Miller from Illinois.[xxiv] Candidates for governor are speaking out against WHO overreach after witnessing two years of federal overreach and promising to stand strong to protect the health of their constituents.[xxv] State legislators, like in Louisiana, are voicing opposition as well![xxvi]

Additionally, in just one week three new bills were introduced in Congress to protect U.S. sovereignty in public health matters. Senator Rick Scott of Florida introduced S4305 on May 25, a bill to limit the authority of the WHO on the U.S. and oppose amendments not approved by Congress.[xxvii] Senator Ron Johnson announced his introduction of a bill, “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act.”[xxviii] And Representatives Rogers and Massie introduced HR 7806, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act,” which expands congressional oversight beyond the WHO to its parent organization the United Nations.[xxix]

Because of your voice, our lawmakers are taking action, and quickly!

Steps You Can Take Now:

You are making a difference! Our lawmakers are hearing your message about protecting our rights and our Constitution when it comes to health. Let’s keep the momentum going!

Step 1: Tell your lawmakers about the WHO’s plans for global health governance. Your representatives can support HR 419, and your senators can make sure they are doing their constitutional duty to advise and approve of any international treaties. Our campaign makes it easy to get in touch with email and phone scripts that you can use or adapt to send a message.

Stop the WHO!

Step 2: We can stop medical tyranny by voting people into office who will stand for health freedom! To have good candidates on the ballot in November, we must vote now in the primaries. Check out where your candidates stand using our Vote for Health Freedom Guide for your state! Go to our Vote for Health Freedom page, or Text the letters VHF to 52886, to learn about candidates in your area!

Vote for Health Freedom

Step 3: Please support our work in bringing this information to light. Every penny counts toward exposing the global health agenda and educating our lawmakers into action!

Donate
References & Sources

___________________

**Comment**

According to an article written last year, the U.S. is on course to become a ‘digital dictatorship’ under a proposed biomedical research agency. This agency would merge national security with public health, a perfect formula for a dangerous agenda that would destroy medical freedom as we know it.

This agency would “use both physical and mental health ‘warning signs’ to prevent outbreaks of disease or violence before they occur. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic ‘pre-crime’ organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness as well as ‘wrongthink.’”

This article proves the political interference at HHS as well as the fact governments are working in lockstep to bring in digital I.D.s & a social credit system.

The CDC already rules both research and the medical profession with an iron fist and medical freedom is increasingly under fire.
All of this sounds like a perfect prelude to global “vaccine” passports.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Despite COVID Vax Destroying Female Reproductive Systems & Killing Youth, FDA Rubberstamps Moderna 2-Dose Shot for Kids Based on Insufficient Evidence

https://thenewamerican.com/covid-vax-destroying-female-reproductive-systems-killing-kids-toxicologist-warns/  Video Here (Approx. 20 Min)

Covid Vax Destroying Female Reproductive Systems & Killing Kids, Toxicologist Warns

by Alex Newman
Audio Playe

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 20:38 — 28.5MB)

The experimental Covid injections forced on millions by the Biden administration are killing people and wreaking havoc on female reproductive organs and other body systems, warned toxicologist Dr. Janci Lindsey in this interview on Conversations That Matter with The New American magazine’s Alex Newman. Dr. Lindsey, who holds PhDs in biochemistry and molecular biology and serves as director of Toxicology and molecular biology for a toxicology firm, worked on Rockefeller-funded research into fertility regulating vaccines in the 1990s. Among other concerns, she warned that the shots are causing all sorts of toxic effects on the human body. Within the next 6 months, humanity should expect to see another “plandemic” to bring in more medical tyranny, she warned. Dr. Lindsey urged everyone to refuse to comply.

At 11:30 Dr. Lindsey discusses minocycline as a therapeutic to ameliorate COVID “vaccine” injury as well as glutathione, NAC, proper diet, and vitamin C.  She also discussed how the spike protein hangs out in the lymph nodes and that ivermectin & HCQ may help this as well as the dangers blood clotting.

___________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-moderna-two-dose-covid-vaccine-kids/

Breaking: FDA Panel Recommends Moderna Two-Dose COVID Vaccine for Kids Ages 6 to 17 Despite Serious Safety Concerns

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory panel on Tuesday voted 22 – 0 to authorize Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for children ages 6 to 11 and 12 to 17 despite the lack of short- and long-term safety data and no evidence children are at risk of serious illness.

By Megan Redshaw

6/14/22

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) vaccine advisory panel today voted unanimously to recommend Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 6 to 17 after determining the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks for use.

The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) voted 22 to 0 to recommend Moderna’s two-dose vaccine for 6- to 11-year-olds at half the strength of the adult version, and 22 to 0 in favor of authorizing the shot for 12- to 17-year-olds at the same strength as adults.

The FDA’s vaccine advisors will meet again on Wednesday to discuss amending Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine to include the “administration of the primary series to infants and children 6 months through 5 years of age.”

(See link for article)

__________________

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/fda-rubberstamps-the-moderna-covid?

FDA Rubberstamps the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for Kids Aged 6-17 Based on Insufficient Evidence

Yesterday, the vote was in 100% in favor of “approval” of the vaccine for kids 6 to 17. None of the votes were based on Science.

James Lyons-Weiler

This article is dedicated to the parents of the children not yet harmed or killed by COVID-19 vaccines. We are trying to warn you that the FDA and CDC are whole-heartedly engaged in fraud.

Dr. Toby Rogers deserves credit for sitting through a grueling, “heart-braking” nine hours of FDA rubber-stamping COVID-19 vaccines based on clinically trivial endpoints. This rubber-stamp is based on data showing no serious cases of COVID19 in children (no hospitalizations). Here I review most of his interview with Steve Kirsch. (Link to video).

Under EUA rules, an emergency must be in place. Yesterday, I pointed out the vanishingly small number of cases since March 2020.  (See link for Weiler’s point by point detailing of the FDA’s “political theatre.”

____________________

**COMMENT**

There was a public comment session during the meeting where many expressed serious concern over recommending a gene therapy injection to an age group that has almost a ZERO risk of experiencing severe illness or death from COVID.

Dr. Harvey Klein, orthopedic surgeon, mechanical engineer and yes, even a rocket scientist said he is appalled at the FDA’s arrogance in even “thinking of vaccinating healthy children with outdated, highly toxic COVID vaccines,” and that have a 99.998% recovery rate with no sequelae.

Pharmacologist, pharmacist, FDA and healthcare policy oversight fellow and FDA reform advocate at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., Dr. David Gortler states the FDA and the advisory panel have “maintained a highly non-scientific and casual attitude toward approving a vaccine whose short- and long-term effects on children are unclear.”  After reminding the FDA of the need for parents to be informed of “vaccine” safety, he stated the FDA has failed to address genotoxicity, teratogenicity, oncogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines and cardiovascular risk following “vaccination”, potential fertility issues and clinical effects of spike proteins in donated or transfused blood.  He ended by stating that four million doses must be administered to children 5 to 11 years of age to prevent a single ICU admission in the same age group.

This means that if you assume two doses per child, two MILLION children must risk potentially serious side-effects and/or death to prevent a single child from entering the ICU.

But the real clincher came from Kathy Dopp and Dr. Stephanie Seneff’s analysis which highlighted the following:
  • Children under 18 are 51 more times more likely to die from the injection than they are to die from COVID if not “vaccinated.”
  • The COVID injection actually increases a child’s risk of dying from COVID.

It was also pointed out that instead of breaking down the data per age group, the “vaccine” manufacturer lumped all the age groups together to “massage” the data.  When each group is looked at separately, the shot fails in each category according to Dr. Toby Rogers. He also points out that Moderna created 20 adverse event tables allowing it to simply eliminate or hide data is didn’t like. Please also see this important paper written by Dr. Rogers on how the FDA is set to decide on Pfizer’s jab for kids based on unethical trial data that makes the data functionally useless for making decisions.

Again, it can not be over emphasized that science is now being done by press release and the very people doing the “science” are selling the products. 

Lastly, despite the CDC’s narrowed case definition of “myocarditis,” which excludes cases of cardiac arrest, ischemic strokes and deaths due to heart problems that occur before one has the chance to go to the emergency department, 635 cases of myocarditis in the 5 to 17 age group have been confirmed. Imagine the numbers if the case definition were more realistic and accurate. Lyme/MSIDS patients should be well aware of the CDC’s shenanigans with “case definitions” by now.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see something is rotten in Denmark.
Take a stand and tell the FDA to get their hands off our children.

For more:

The global experiment must stop.
Millions have already been adversely affected by these clot shots and nobody knows what the future holds for those who received these gene therapy shots that have caused more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Doctors Sue FDA, Allege Crusade Against Ivermectin ‘Unlawfully Interfered” With Their Ability to Treat Patients

**UPDATE**

Go here to learn of all the things ivermectin does, where to get it, and treatment protocols.

The FDA is now trying to rewrite history and the fact they prohibited safe, effective, cheap drugs.  Doctors have been viciously harassed by those benefitting from the COVID shots – the AMA and corrupt public health. Some have lost their jobs for prescribing or even talking about these censored drugs.  Families have had to utilize the court system simply to have access to drugs effective for COVID that are on the WHO essential list of medicines. The problem is ‘authorities’ knew these drugs worked long ago, but concealed it.

Back in January, 2022 Project Veritas uncovered government documents showing ivermectin, HCQ, and interferon work for COVID.  The relevant portion reads:

Because of its (now) known nature, the SARSr-CoV-WIV’s illness is readily resolved with early treatment that inhibits the viral replication which spread the spike proteins around the body (which induce a harmful overactive immune response as the body tries to clear the spikes from the ACE2 receptors). Many of the early treatment protocols ignored by the authorities work because they inhibit viral replication or modulate the immune response to the spike proteins, which makes sense within the context of what EcoHealth was creating. Some of these treatment protocols also inhibit the action of the engineered spike protein. For instance, Ivermectin (identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all phases of the illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response. Of note, chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloroquine, identified April 2020 as curative) is identified in the proposal as a SARSr-CoV inhibitor, as is interferon (identified May 2020 as curative). [Emphasis added.]

These treatments interfered with their lucrative gene therapy injections they are determined to get inside every human being

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/doctors-fda-ivermectin-patients/

Doctors Sue FDA, Allege Crusade Against Ivermectin ‘Unlawfully Interfered’ With Their Ability to Treat Patients

In a lawsuit filed June 2, Drs. Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden and Paul E. Marik argued the FDA acted outside of its authority by directing the public, including health professionals and patients, to not use ivermectin — even though the drug is fully approved by the FDA for human use.

Ivermectin lawsuit fda feature

Three physicians are suing the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for launching what they allege is a “crusade” against ivermectin as a treatment for COVID-19 that “unlawfully interfered” with the doctors’ ability to practice medicine.

In a lawsuit filed June 2, Drs. Robert L. Apter, Mary Talley Bowden and Paul E. Marik argued the FDA acted outside of its authority by directing the public, including health professionals and patients, to not use ivermectin — even though the drug is fully approved by the FDA for human use.

The suit, filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division, also names the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra and Robert Califf, acting FDA commissioner.

According to the complaint:

“The FDA generally cannot ban particular uses of human drugs once they are otherwise approved and admitted to the market, even if such use differs from the labeling — commonly referred to as ‘off-label’ use.

“The FDA also can not advise whether a patient should take an approved drug for a particular purpose. Those decisions fall within the scope of the doctor-patient relationship.

“Attempts by the FDA to influence or intervene in the doctor-patient relationship amount to interference with the practice of medicine, the regulation of which is — and always has been — reserved to states.”

The plaintiffs said their lawsuit isn’t about whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for COVID-19. It’s about who determines the appropriate treatment for each unique patient and whether the FDA can interfere with that process.

In their complaint, they site an FDA publication, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19,” and tweets from the FDA — including one implying that ivermectin is intended only for animals — among examples of the FDA discouraging the use of ivermectin.

The plaintiffs also argued if the FDA is allowed to interfere with the practice of medicine now, using the pandemic as a cover, “this interference will metastasize to other circumstances, destroying the carefully constructed statutory wall between federal and state regulatory powers, and between the FDA and the professional judgment of health professionals.”

“This lawsuit, brought by three eminently qualified physicians, is a welcome development,” said Mary Holland, Children’s Health Defense president and general counsel.

Holland told The Defender:

“These doctors rightfully assert that the FDA, assisted by corporate media, have unlawfully interfered in the doctor-patient relationship and the appropriate treatment for individual patients. Regulating the doctor-patient relationship is an area of well-established state, not federal, law.

“I hope these plaintiffs will enjoin the FDA from continuing to restrict access to ivermectin and from penalizing healthcare practitioners who use this licensed drug for their patients.”

The plaintiffs: well-respected in their field, high success rate treating COVID patients

Apter, who is licensed to practice medicine in Arizona and Washington and has a COVID-19 patient survival rate of more than 99.98%, was referred to the Washington Medical Commission and Arizona Medical Board for disciplinary proceedings for prescribing ivermectin to treat COVID-19.

In a press release, Apter said, “If doctors are freed to treat patients according to their best judgment and unprejudiced evaluation of the medical literature, many thousands more deaths and serious disabilities will be averted.”

Apter said the FDA’s pronouncements against the use of ivermectin “have been the basis for disciplinary actions against doctors, interfere with the doctor-patient relationship, and have had a severe chilling effect on the use of life-saving medication for a deadly disease.”

In the lawsuit, Apter argued that government pressure, “largely through the FDA,” also led pharmacies — especially in large corporate chains — to refuse to fill ivermectin prescriptions for COVID-19, because that position is supported by the FDA.

Bowden, who according to the lawsuit has 40 years of experience in emergency medicine, began recommending ivermectin to treat COVID-19 in early 2020. She treated more than 3,900 patients for COVID-19, with a success rate of over 99.97%.

She said the FDA’s actions regarding ivermectin, specifically its directives to stop using the drug to treat COVID-19, harmed Bowden’s ability to practice medicine and treat patients.

Bowden’s employer, Houston Methodist Hospital, last year forced her to resign by suspending her privileges for spreading “COVID misinformation.”

Bowden said she is “fighting back — the public needs to understand what the FDA has done is illegal, and I hope this suit will prevent them from continuing to interfere in the doctor-patient relationship.”

In an interview earlier this year with The Defender, Bowden said she was all for the COVID vaccines when they first came out — it was only when she started seeing what was happening with all the breakthrough cases that she wondered, “Why am I seeing so many COVID cases among the fully vaccinated?”

Then her patients began having adverse reactions. “If I hadn’t seen that firsthand, I would still think the vaccine was the way to go,” she said.

As the pandemic evolved, Bowden developed protocols for preventing and treating COVID patients. She said she’s seen excellent results.

“The basis of it is ivermectin,” she said. “And also vitamins C and D, quercetin and zinc, and black seed oil. It’s nothing complicated — and it’s just like with anything in medicine — not one size fits all — protocols are guidelines.”

The controversy over prescribing ivermectin was initially “intimidating and isolating,” she said. “I thought I was a little bitty island in a huge ocean, and now I realize that I’m part of at least half a continent.”

Marik, author of more than 750 publications, was professor of medicine and chief of pulmonary and critical care medicine at Eastern Virginia Medical School (EVMS) in Norfolk, Virginia, from 2009 through 2021. He also served as a director of the intensive care unit at Sentara Norfolk General Hospital.

He developed a protocol for EVMS for treating COVID-19, called the EVMS COVID-19 Management Protocol, which included the MATH+ Protocol.

However, according to the lawsuit, Marik was forced to resign from his positions at EVMS and Sentara Norfolk General Hospital for promoting the use of ivermectin — “as well as other safe, cheap, and effective off-label FDA-approved drugs” — to treat COVID-19 following the FDA’s attempts to stop use of those drugs for that purpose.

Marik alleged in the lawsuit that refusing to allow patients to receive effective early treatment for COVID-19 “led to innumerable hospitalizations and deaths, and caused extreme distress for patients, their families, and health professionals.”

Boyden, Gray & Associates, a Washington, DC-based law firm, is representing the plaintiffs.

Ivermectin was developed in the 1970s as a veterinary medicine to treat parasitic diseases in livestock, but a decade or so later was hailed as a “wonder drug” and received approval for human use as a therapeutic against diseases such as river blindness — or onchocerciasis — and lymphatic filariasis, according to Newsmax.

Since 1987, it has been used safely in 3.7 billion doses worldwide. William Campbell and Satoshi Omura won the 2015 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their research on the drug.

Studies show ivermectin is associated with lower COVID-19 death rates, but the FDA — with help from mainstream media — continues to state the drug is ineffective for treating COVID.

© [6/6/22] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts

__________________

**COMMENT**

You know it’s bad when it takes a court-order to utilize a cheap, safe, effective drug that saves lives.
  • A  judge in Virginia has held a hospital in contempt of court for refusing to give ivermectin to a patient.
  • New Hampshire and Tennessee have passed a bill making ivermectin available over the counter.
  • Kansas, Oklahoma and Nebraska have passed bills allowing doctors to prescribe ivermectin & HCQ.
  • As of March, 2022 twenty-eight states have bills that would either restrict medical boards’ authority to discipline clinicians who prescribe ivermectin, allow off-label use of the medication or both. Many of these states are concentrated in the Midwest and Southeast.
  • A medical journal has called for ivermectin to be globally and systemically employed.

But the AMA, AphA, ASHP, in lock-step with the FDA, continues to promise to fight ‘misinformation’ – an overused & highly politicized term that simply means anything that defies the accepted narrative created by conflict-riddled public health ‘authorities’ that have patents on virtually every aspect of COVID.  If you are unaware, we are in a war for truth.

For more:

There were more than 500 deaths in the first year of remdesivir usage.  Please read this article on why hospitals are pushing the “Fauci Death Protocol” which includes the ineffective & toxic drug remdesivir.  Some nurses refer to remdesivir as “Run, death is near.”

There have been 20 deaths in 19 years of ivermectin usage.

The FDA, spurred by “multiple” reports of ivermectin ‘poisoning,’ lied when it put out a post on it causing “serious harm, seizures, coma, and even death”.  When the author inquired on how many is “multiple,” she was told FOUR.Yet, the FDA had no trouble approving remdesivir which has caused far more deaths.

CDC also bad-mouthed ivermectin and pushed the “calls to the poison control center” narrative. The problem is they give no data to support this claim.

In India, ivermectin is a house-hold name and easily available for about $2 at the nearest drug store.  People there no longer fear COVID.  They simply treat it.

Recently the FDA was caught creating and using unreliable and inconsistent data to create an illusion of COVID shot efficacy in an attempt to justify approval for infants and toddlers. Peter Marks, charged with setting FDA decisions on whether to consider “vaccines” for specific populations, is also conveniently involved in a study conducted to bolster the “vaccines” he is tasked to decide upon – a clear conflict of interest. Call your senators and representatives and demand that Marks resign.  Email them this article.

More FDA crimes:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

Gov. Still Pushing COVID Shots While CDC Covers Up Injuries & Deaths, Including the Fact 82% of Pregnant Women Lost Their Babies

https://rumble.com/v17wnij-govt.-pushing-for-more-vaccinations-while-cdc-covers-up-injuries-deaths-fro.html  News Video Here (Approx. 8 Min)

New information appears to show that while the US government is still pushing Americans to take an experimental “vaccine”, the CDC is also covering up evidence about the drug’s harmful effects. One America’s Pearson Sharp has more.

You may feel Sharp’s comment that the government is trying to kill us to be a bit over the top; however, a mountain of evidence supports this claim that the FDA attempted to hide for 75 years until a FOIA request resulted in a judge ordering them to release 55,000 pages per month.  Read on…..

https://rumble.com/v18y2fw-more-lethal-than-abortion-pills-horrifying-miscarriage-rates-with-the-covid.html  Video Here (Approx. 2 Min)

More Lethal Than Abortion Pills: Horrifying Miscarriage Rates With the COVID Injection

Listen to this brief 2 minute video of Dr. Elizabeth Mumper explain how in January of 2021, the New England Journal of Medicine came out with an article that stated that pregnant women who got the shot did not have a higher rate of spontaneous miscarriage. However, when you look at the data, they lumped women in their third trimester into the first-trimester group and assessed whether or not they had a first-trimester spontaneous miscarriage. When you take that cohort out, the rate of miscarriage was 82%, right in line with findings from the Pfizer documents.

Dr. Elizabeth Mumper:

“For a first-trimester woman to get this injection, they have more of a chance of having a miscarriage or stillbirth than if they were to actually take an abortifacient.”

___________________

https://genocide.news/2022-06-09-pfizer-documents-mrna-covid-vaccines-mass-depopulation

Pfizer’s own documents admit that mRNA covid ‘vaccines’ will result in mass depopulation

06/09/2022 / By

The latest drop of pages from the secret Pfizer documents reveals that the pharmaceutical giant is fully aware that its Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) “vaccine” will soon result in mass depopulation of the world.

The June 1 dump contains a document called “reissue_5.3.6 postmarketing experience.pdf,” page 12 of which includes disturbing data on getting Pfizer’s Fauci Flu injection during pregnancy and lactation.

It turns out that 90 percent of pregnant women who took the shot ended up losing their babies. This is a shocking figure that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) apparently did not think twice about when granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to the jab.

“Pfizer states in the document that by 28th February 2021 there were 270 known cases of exposure to the mRNA injection during pregnancy,” reports Exposé News. “Forty-six-percent of the mothers (124) exposed to the Pfizer Covid-19 injection suffered an adverse reaction.”

“Of those 124 mothers suffering an adverse reaction, 49 were considered non-serious adverse reactions, whereas 75 were considered serious. This means 58% of the mothers who reported suffering adverse reactions suffered a serious adverse event ranging from uterine contraction to foetal death.”

The latest batch of released Pfizer documents also contains a concerning revelation about pregnancies of which the company somehow lost track. Of the 270 pregnancies Pfizer was tracking, a shocking 238 of them just disappeared from the data set.

Of the 33 pregnancies that Pfizer still tracked, a shocking 23 of them resulted in spontaneous abortion. Two resulted in premature baby death; two resulted in intrauterine death; one resulted in neonatal death; one is listed as “outcome pending;” and only one resulted in a “normal outcome.”

Source

The only study used to push COVID shots on women is a study on rats which actually found evidence of abnormal fetal formation and birth defects as well as ‘pre-implantation loss’ rate in the “vaxxed” group was double that of the control group. A confidential Pfizer document reveals the shot accumulates in the ovaries. Official UK data published by Public Health Scotland offers some concerning clues as to the consequences of that accumulation on the ovaries. Those that got the COVID shot also are suffering from ovarian cancer at a significantly higher rate.

So now we know –

  • Confidential Pfizer documents show a miscarriage rate between 82 and 97%, which we were warned about in January by Dr. Bruchet who spoke at a rally at Lions Gate Hospital that exposed the stillborn deaths in babies whose mothers had received the COVID shots.  It appears the ‘powers that be’ want him quiet as he was promptly handcuffed, imprisoned, and drugged.
  • The only animal study performed to prove the safety of the Pfizer shot during pregnancy indicated an increased risk of infertility and birth defects
  • and further confidential Pfizer documents reveal the injection accumulates in the ovaries
  • only 1-10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to VAERS, which means reality is far, far worse
  • the risk of suffering a miscarriage is 1,517% higher in pregnant women getting the COVID shot compared to the flu shot

What we don’t know is the impact on long term fertility.

  • Studies also suggest a link between the injections and a more aggressive and rapid in progression Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), called “mad-cow” disease in animals, a rare and fatal brain condition that does not have a treatment capable of stopping progression.
  • Children’s Health Defense recently put out a film titled INFERTILITY: A DIABOLICAL AGENDA a chilling tale of African women whose fertility was tragically stripped away through an experimental tetanus vaccination program.

“When they’re through with Africa, they’re coming for you.” — DR. STEPHEN KARANJA

For more information, studies, memes, and other related content go to InfertilityMovie.org

Source

A depopulation scheme doesn’t seem so far fetched after all.

https://rumble.com/v17wdu4-the-dead-people-dont-lie-they-can-smear-and-attack-doctors-but-they-cant-co.html  Video Here (Approx. 3 Min)

“The Dead People Don’t Lie” – Left and Right, Healthcare Workers All Over the World Are Seeing Strange Things

Published June 9, 2022 
 

“We’re seeing tons of 20 and 30-year-olds coming in with breast cancer, and about 99% of people in their population are jabbed.”

Radiologist: “I just saw two high-grade breast cancers in two 31-year-old women four weeks after their booster.”

Chair of Oncology at a large hospital: “I usually see an aggressive brain cancer in a young patient about every decade or so. I’ve seen five in the last month after the boosters.”

“Left and right, wherever I go, the medical community is starting to speak up and confirm what I’m seeing.”

And speaking of covering up injuries and deaths:

US Naval Air Force Has Ordered a “Safety Pause” for Aircraft After Multiple Deadly Crashes

Please note that while reports on these crashes fail to mention the “vaccination” status of these pilots, the Navy currently has 97% of its service members “vaccinated” with the COVID gene therapy injections. 

Pilot Joshua Yoder, who is the co-founder of the U.S. Freedom Flyers, was interviewed by Steve Kirsch where he revealed that he was receiving many phone calls from other pilots in the commercial airline industry who are also suffering heart problems after receiving a COVID-19 mandatory “vaccine”, but they fear coming forward because they will lose their jobs.

The string of crashes isn’t a good look for the Naval Air Forces who are actively trying to recruit young Americans to join the service following the release of the new patriotic film “Top Gun: Maverick.”  Source

In a further cover-up the DOD recently edited the medical database to hide military “vaccine” injuries after whistleblowers testified on the reported spike of injuries in a legal challenge.  A 2021 study on the U.S. military linked the injections with heart inflammation and a U.S. attorney has labeled this a genocide as there has been a 1100% increase in military deaths following the shots.

 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Doctors ‘Baffled’ By SADS Despite Government Data Proving COVID Injection to Blame

https://expose-news.com/2022/06/09/covid-vaccine-causing-sudden-adult-death-syndrome/

Doctors ‘baffled’ by sudden uptick in “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” despite Government data proving COVID Vaccine is to blame

By on
 

Doctors are allegedly baffled at what is causing a sudden uptick in what they have dubbed ‘Sudden Adult Death Syndrome’ among adults under the age of 40 over the past year, and are now urging all under 40’s to go and get their heart checked.

But these doctors need not remain “baffled” any longer because we have rock-solid evidence that the Covid-19 vaccine is to blame.

  • Official UK Office for National Statistics data shows vaccinated adults aged 18 to 39 have a 92% higher mortality rate (per 100,000) than unvaccinated adults.
  • Official Public Health Scotland data reveals there has been a 67% increase compared to the historical average in the number of 15 to 44-year-olds suffering heart attacks, cardiac arrest, myocarditis, stroke, and other cardiovascular diseases since this age group was first offered the Covid-19 injection.
  • And figures published by NHS England in response to a freedom of information request show that ambulance call-outs for heart illness have doubled among all age groups including the under 30’s since the beginning of the Covid-19 vaccination campaign.

(See link for article and graphs)

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses