Jonathan Emord talks about corruption within the FDA
Constitutional Attorney Jonathan Emord discusses how corruption within the Food and Drug Administration results in unsafe pharmaceutical drugs becoming available to the public. www.freedomfromchoicefilm.com
What concerns me is that a significant minority… significant minority of drugs that have been approved by FDA have been approved over the FDA’s own medical reviewers’ objections on safety grounds. And the FDA’s whole system of drug review is bogus. It’s designed to protect and advance the interests of the drug industry. A lot of people don’t realize this but FDA never tests the drugs it approves. FDA does no independent testing at all. It relies entirely on the testing done by the drug advocate, the proponent of the drug application that has a self-interest and a conflict of interest. That party is looked to for all the drug testing. They do their own testing. There have been multiple instances of corruption in this process where false information or negative information has been kept away from the FDA so the FDA will approve the drug.
_____________
**Comment**
The FDA is a hopelessly corrupt agency that works as a revolving door and completely aligns with Big Pharma to monopolize medicine and take away patient/doctor choice. It censors free speech, targets companies and anything it deems competition, and is a threat to healthcare by relying on scientific fraud to approve drugs and “vaccines” it has vested interests in. Private interests have used legal loopholes to corrupt the FDA.
FDA crimes:
- Bypasses advisory panel & ignores & manipulates data
- Colludes with “vaccine” companies to bypass safety standards
- Approves ineffective and toxic drugs
- Has been sued by 80 public health officers and researchers formed an alliance to get COVID injection data, but wanted 55-75 years to release data. A judge ordered them to release 55,000 pages per month – which will take approximately 8 months for completion. Unfortunately, the FDA will redact information that it decides is not for public consumption, which might make the data meaningless
- Cherry-picks data & hides bad data
- Number of COVID shot doses (denominator) was redacted, preventing any computation of rates and risks. This also means the FDA may be in contempt of court.
- Accused of performing hat tricks, and makes decisions with NO DATA
- A pathologist filed a “stay of action” against the FDA for using faulty PCR tests in the “vaccine” trials.
- Has also been sued due to the fact there cannot legally be a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time
- Receives a billion dollars annually by the very people they regulate according to a whistleblower
- Has direct ties to Big Pharma and is guilty of ‘misinformation’
- Never tests the drugs it approves
- Is accused of using back-channels to get expensive, ineffective drugs approved
- Continues to create witch-hunts against supplements and alternative health
Please see Jeremy R. Hammond’s examples of FDA corruption:
- To briefly review, in Part I of this newsletter series, we looked at some illustrative examples the FDA’s willful intent to mislead.
- In Part II, we looked at how the FDA deceives about the risk to children of dying from COVID-19.
- In Part III, we looked at how the FDA deceives about the risk to children of being hospitalized for COVID-19.
- In Part IV, we looked at how the FDA deceives about the risk to children from “Long COVID”.
- In in the last installment, Part V, we looked at how the FDA deceives about the risk to children of myocarditis from COVID-19 versus the risk of myocarditis from vaccination.
JP explains What the FDA is Like
Kind of makes you think about issues in Lymeland:
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 