**UPDATE April 6, 2022**
As they say: “Follow the money”.
More and more is trickling out about Pfizer including whistleblowers stating the shot is a bioweapon, data was falsified, internal emails tried to cover up fetal cell usage, that it copies the mRNA spike protein into human DNA, has caused increased COVID in young kids, and the suspicious coincidence that the 2022 Oscars were sponsored by Pfizer, the company that just happens to have a new Alopecia drug coming out very soon, and the Rock/Smith distraction. Seems everything today is “brought to you by Pfizer.”
FDA Begins Releasing Pfizer COVID Vax Documents
— Court-ordered release runs risk of “cherry picking and taking things out of context”
The FDA turned over thousands of documents related to its review of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine last week, marking the first of several releases mandated by a court in Texas earlier this year.
The agency released 55,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine review documents last Tuesday, following a loss in court months earlier that forced it to expedite its process to make the information available to the public. In a January court order, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released — totaling more than 300,000 pages. (See link for article)
Pfizer Vax Docs Released by Court Order
Dr. John Campbell
Nine pages of side effects listed, some have not been confirmed. Nearly 159,000 side effects were listed which means each person on average reported 3-4 different side-effects.
Reporting is voluntary and the magnitude of under reporting is unknown; however, if we are to look at a 2011 report by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, VAERS only captures fewer than 1% of adverse reactions. It also only captures less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events, and only 1-13% of serious events are reported to the FDA. Historically, under reporting is prolific.
Dr. Jesse Santiano lists the Pfizer adverse events of “special interest” and states these are events that should be monitored by the drug or “vaccine” company. The events can be severe or not serious, but can lead to a serious medical condition. He also states that more than 95% of the events listed are negatively impacting and life-changing. Most doctors and nurses are unaware of this list, created by Pfizer itself on conditions to look for after people get COVID shots. Anyone getting these or other reactions (not listed) should report them to Pfizer and VAERS even if you received a shot from a different manufacturer. Dr. Santiano has listed the conditions in alphabetical order, many with links for you to read about them, as well as research articles. You should also check out his updated list of COVID articles – all great resources.
- It took a nonprofit suing the FDA for COVID shot data to be released to the public.
- The FDA wanted 55-75 years to release the information.
- The FDA redacts confidential business and private info as well as trade secrets.
- The court concluded the release of data is of “paramount public importance” that is “necessary”.
- The article is quick to point out that “anti-vax” advocates have already capitalized on the release of data and immediately calls out Children’s Health Defense, run by John F. Kennedy who has stated repeatedly he is not “anti-vax,” yet facts be damned. It’s more important to name call and bully than present facts.
- Predictably, the FDA is very worried about people cherry-picking data, which ironically is also supposedly why the CDC was recently caught red-handed withholding data for more than a year. This is where we should hear the booming voice of Colonel Jessup in “A Few Good Men”: http://
- Then, Medpage finger points at specific doctors they state are “known for spreading false or misleading information during the pandemic.” The bullying and name calling is tangible. And now, the Feds are giving Big Tech until May 3, 2022 to rat out those engaging in “misinformation,” with the new FDA chief throwing his weight behind it too.
Speaking of “cherry picking”, the CDC reports that 6 months of U.S. Data finds adverse events caused by COVID shots to be “minor and transient,” and that few patients sought medical care. This mirage is quite easy to create when you just simply deny causality between the injections and the adverse events and deaths. Similarly with Lyme/MSIDS, the CDC uses it’s own study to stamp out any threat to their narrative that COVID ‘vaccines’ are ‘safe and effective’ and are the only recourse despite effective treatments that are heavily censored and banned. CDC’s Walensky belatedly admitted that they relied too heavily of ‘vaccines’ as a “cure all,” suspiciously right before mid-term elections.
Reality; however, paints a far different picture:
“They coded the deaths. They said, “Did the vaccine cause [death] or was there some other cause? 86% of the time, there’s no other cause. 50% of the deaths occur within two days of taking the shot; 80% occur within a week.” ~ Dr McCullough
Now in March, 2022 we find that a CDC peer-reviewed study shows that COVID injection DEATHS represent 1.3% of reported side-effects and 6.6% were serious. This of course led the CDC to quietly adjust their metrics for measuring COVID risk, purposely manipulating to make it appear the pandemic was easing up. We went from 90% of the country in high-risk red zones to overnight, having less than 30% of the country in high-risk orange zones. The CDC constantly manipulates and withholds data. Remember that historically VAERS only gets about a 1% capture rate.
But the CDC is far from alone. For decades the FDA has allowed drug companies to cherry-pick data to get approval for drugs. When a drug fails, Big Pharma only publishes papers with positive results and sweeps the negative ones under the rug. A 2013 book settles the point conclusively: industry research only gives positive results. And this well-written article in Frontiers states that Big Pharma takes advantage of medical science by doing it’s own research and smoothly integrating it with medical science. This has been blatantly seen in the era of COVID.
- FDA “cherry-picked” evidence to push cloned-animal foods, and downplayed evidence of health risks.
- The FDA has been accused of using back-channels to get expensive, ineffective drugs approved.
So what about industry researched “vaccines” and “FDA approved” COVID treatments?”
- The FDA has been accused of being “willfully ignorant” about ivermectin and that global studies prove efficacy against COVID. A recent study confirms ivermectin beats out 9 other treatments.
- The FDA ignores data and gives Pfizer shots a favorable conclusion. Number of doses (denominator) was redacted, preventing any computation of rates and risks. Isn’t that convenient? This also means the FDA may be in contempt of court.
- AstraZeneca has been accused of including “outdated information” in touting effectiveness. An independent panel scolded the company for “cherry-picking” data.
- A pathologist has called out the FDA for “glossing over” potential risks of an mRNA vaccine while concealing its true efficacy. This same pathologist filed a “stay of action” against the FDA for using faulty PCR tests in the “vaccine” trials.
- San Diego scientists call out FDA Commissioner over “cherry-picked” COVID plasma data, and that support for the treatment is unfounded.
- Gilead‘s expensive but toxic remdesivir, used widely in the “Fauci death protocol”, is ineffective for COVID, but somehow managed to still become FDA approved.
- Regarding boosters, the FDA’s been accused of performing hat tricks, as they made the decision with NO DATA. Further, every member of the ACIP which reviews the level of evidence to vote for boosters has conflicts of interest with vaccine manufacturers.
- In this article we learn that Children’s Health Defense Fund has filed a lawsuit against the FDA due to the fact you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That’s against the law, but the government has done it anyway. The request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but CHD is still pursuing the case.
I’m sure there are thousands of more examples, but it’s laughable that the FDA is worried about “cherry-picking” when it does it with abandon.
Let us never forget that when Pfizer applied for FDA approval, they were completely aware of almost 159,000 adverse events but wanted this fact sealed for 75 years.
And these adverse events are not little fevers with some itching or swelling:
- Acute kidney injury
- Acute flaccid myelitis
- Anti-sperm antibody positive
- Brain stem embolism
- Brain stem thrombosis
- Cardiac arrest
- Cardiac failure
- Cardiac ventricular thrombosis
- Cardiogenic shock
- Central nervous system vasculitis
- Death neonatal
- Deep vein thrombosis
- Encephalitis brain stem
- Encephalitis hemorrhagic
- Frontal lobe epilepsy
- Foaming at mouth
- Epileptic psychosis
- Facial paralysis
- Fetal distress syndrome
- Gastrointestinal amyloidosis
- Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
- Hashimoto’s encephalopathy
- Hepatic vascular thrombosis
- Herpes zoster reactivation
- Immune-mediated hepatitis
- Interstitial lung disease
- Jugular vein embolism
- Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
- Liver injury
- Low birth weight
- Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
- Myocarditis, neonatal seizure
- Pancreatitis, pneumonia
- Temporal lobe epilepsy
- Testicular autoimmunity
- Thrombotic cerebral infarction
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Venous thrombosis neonatal
- Vertebral artery thrombosis.
- There were 1,246 other medical conditions following the shots, over 25,000 of which were nervous system disorders, 17,000 musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and 14,000 gastrointestinal disorders
The fly in the ointment on COVID shot efficacy
Regarding efficacy, please remember that ‘vaccine’ manufacturers did a ‘slight of hand’ to obtain their highly touted positive results: they simply discarded absolute risk. When absolute risk is included, COVID injections are 1% or less effective. They also purposely omitted those with natural immunity because those who have recovered from COVID are at risk for a hyperimmune response after “vaccination,” and some WILL actually DIE. Big Pharma didn’t want that fact to be exposed. These jabs lose any effectiveness they might have within weeks and don’t work at all for variants.
Dr. Cole states that whatever small benefit (0.345%) the injections had early on during the middle of an epidemic with a fast-moving virus is completely diminished by the fact natural immunity and early treatments, that are far more effective than “vaccines”, were completely neglected and suppressed.
Many do not know that the flu shot is also a “bust” and has been found to be only 16% effective against the predominant strain.
Further, the COVID shots:
- negatively reprogram your immune system
- set you up for chronic inflammation
- are linked to antibody dependent enhancement (ADE)
- are linked to pathogenic priming
- are linked to heart attacks
- are linked to other heart issues
- are linked to blood issues such as clotting
- don’t stop transmission or infection
- have caused more reports of adverse reactions and deaths than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS
- have been found to be reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 hours
- enter cell nuclei, suppressing DNA repair engine of the human body, which could potentially unleash an explosion of cancer, immunodeficiency, autoimmune disorders and accelerated aging
- are linked to leg amputations
- have no measurable impact on mortality
- are linked to more deaths in kids than COVID itself
- are linked to increased COVID in children
- cause the double “vaxxed” to be 27 times more likely to get reinfected with COVID
- cause the triple “vaxxed” to be more likely to DIE
- cause cases and hospitalizations to increase 1,000% in the “vaxxed” following Omicron
- cause hospitalizations to increase in the “vaxxed” from 1.4 per 100,000 to 35.2 per 100,000
- cause COVID deaths to increase in the “vaxxed”
Further, they are using outdated population estimates that grossly under count the actual number of the unvaccinated, which translates into inflated estimates of COVID cases. Second, they appear to be counting every person for whom they cannot verify vaccination stated as unvaccinated which also translates into overstatement of COVID cases in the unvaccinated and the understatement of cases for the ‘vaccinated.‘ Go here for an excellent read on how public health agencies are using fake science to support their narrative. The CDC was recently called out on this.
- A German insurance company fires CEO for releasing COVID shot injury data and then scrubs the data from the website. The released data suggests ‘authorities’ are significantly under reporting injuries.
- The NIH got Forbes to simply delete a reporter from their employment for simply writing a factual article about Fauci.
- A FOIA request showed emails with Fauci and NIH head, Collins, communicating the need for a quick and devastating published take-down of the Great Barrington Declaration. They conspired with the media to this effect and a day later Google began censoring search results for it. Both men have gone on record stating the Declaration is “dangerous,” “ridiculous,” and “total nonsense.” Mainstream and social media giants then began a smear campaign against it and the epidemiologists behind it, calling the Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford doctors “fringe,” despite the fact 928,000 have signed the declaration.
- At least 12 mysterious deaths of CDC scientists. Could they have been deleted for knowing too much or threatening to speak up?
These corrupt ‘authorities’ will blame anything but the obvious thing. Further, 6 months does not even begin to answer questions about safety and efficacy on a fast-tracked, experimental – never before used in humans gene therapy that is linked to more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.
Lets review some facts:
- FDA FOIA data shows over 1,200 deaths in the first 3 MONTHS of the COVID jab and TENS OF THOUSANDS of adverse events. Please remember in 1976 the Swine flu program was halted in nine states after just 3 deaths. The entire program ended with only 20% of the population vaccinated due to reports of Guillain-Barre.
- One in nine adolescents suffered an adverse event.
- Myocarditis risk is higher from COVID shots than from COVID. It’s three times higher using Pfizer.
- While a multitude of experts stated the ‘pandemic’ was over a year ago, the US Senate just passed a bill to end COVID, which will likely be voted against by the House of Representatives and vetoed by Biden. None of this is shocking as an internal memo shows Biden and the CDC are following advice from a public opinion research firm, not science.
- Bought out public health ‘experts’ have detailed a frightening plan focusing on 12 key areas for living with COVID:
- expensive MERV 13 filtration or HEPA filters in all public buildings which should be monitored and publicly graded. (imagine the expense and power-grabs if this goes into effect)
- another “Warp Speed” program with advanced purchase agreements and incentives (think billions to Big Pharma & our government) to produce an oral antiviral cocktail, despite the fact treatments already exist that are cheap and effective.
- keep pushing “vaccines” despite proof the COVID jabs are worthless, dangerous, and don’t stop transmission, infection, hospitalization, or death.
- More testing, despite it’s utter failure. They want to track, track, and track some more – further eroding individual freedom.
- Under the auspice of “Long COVID” they want a national research program that includes health, “vaccination,” and sociodemograhic data. Another tyrannical power grab for your personal information which isn’t anybody’s business but yours.
- Rather than admit COVID “vaccines” are worthless and dangerous, they want to address workforce shortages with a “pool of flexible healthcare workers” rather than rehire workers who chose to forego the shots. (An obvious breach of our constitutional rights & a form of segregation)
- They selfishly acknowledge health inequity, yet refuse to acknowledge the medical apartheid of illegal “vaccine” mandates and “vaccine” passports.