Children in China Diagnosed With Leukemia After Taking Chinese Vaccines
By Eva Fu
March 11, 2022Updated: March 13, 2022
After receiving her first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, Li Jun’s 4-year-old developed a fever and coughs, which quickly subsided after intravenous therapy at the hospital. But after the second shot, the father could tell something was wrong.
Swelling appeared around his daughter’s eyes and did not go away. For weeks, the girl complained about pains on her legs, where bruises started to emerge seemingly out of nowhere. In January, a few weeks after the second dose, the 4-year-old was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.
“My baby was perfectly healthy before the vaccine dose,” Li (an alias), from China’s north-central Gansu Province, told The Epoch Times. “I took her for a health check. Everything was normal.”
He is among hundreds of Chinese that belong to a social media group claiming to be suffering from or have a household member suffering from leukemia, developed after taking Chinese vaccines. Eight of them confirmed the situation when reached by The Epoch Times. Names of the interviewees have been withheld to protect their safety. (See link for article)
___________________
Important quote:
“Our doctor from the hospital told us that since November, the children coming to their hematology division to treat leukemia have doubled the previous years’ number and they are having a shortage of beds,” he said.
Similarly to censorship in the U.S., these parents are ignored and bullied. The police showed up, fabricated things, and ordered the parents to withdraw from the chat group, and the details of over 200 leukemia patients, filled out by group members, is no longer accessible.
This news video outlines how DOD records show the U.S. funded Anthrax biolabs in Ukraine.
**UPDATE March 24, 2022**
If you are wondering WHY the US has funded bioweapon labs in the Ukraine, The National Pulse just gave an expose’ showing an investment firm (Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners – or RSTP) directed by Hunter Biden & Christopher Heinz (stepson of climate czar John Kerry) partnered with Ukrainian researchers ‘isolating deadly pathogens’ using funds from Obama’s Defense Department. RSTP gave $20 MILLION to the Ukraine in 2015.
This isn’t the first time The National Pulse exposed important links. In July 2021, it revealed the connection between Metabiota, Hunter Biden,Nathan Wolfe(linked to the Global Virome Project, EcoHealth, World Economic Forum and Jeffrey Epstein) and the pandemic-linked EcoHealth Alliance which worked closely with Anthony Fauci’s NIAID and the notorious Wuhan laboratory. See the following for a three part series on these connections:
Part 1: products and services Metabiota sells, who their customers are and how badly they handled the Ebola outbreak in West Africa in 2014-2015.
Part 2: common links between USAID, US DOD & Metabiota. How EcoHealth is linked to the CIA, the Wuham Lab, and the development of the spike protein bioweapon while Metabiota is linked to US military biolabs in Ukraine often run by experts in biologial weapons and biological terrorism.
Part 3: Metabiota’s investors. Metabiota signed agreements with Munich Reinsurance Co., and In-Q-Tel, Inc. IQT, located in Arlington, Virginia supports the US intelligence community and was created by the CIA in 1999. IQT backed Silicon Valley’s Google apps and possibly Facebook.
A 2016 “Trilateral Meeting in Ukraine” with the Ukraine, Poland and the U.S. focused on ongoing cooperative projects in research, surveillance, and diagnostics with the following zoonotic diseases:
avian influenza(natural reservoir is wild birds, but it can be transmitted from human to human as well as from animals)
leptospirosis(a spirochete found in soil and water that can be spread from animals to humans and was found in ticks in 2015)
brucellosis(a cousin to Bartonella that can be airborne, making it a perfect bioweapon)
it also appears anthrax was studied in the Ukraine in 2014 (primarilyadiseaseofherbivores, humans contract it directly or indirectly from animals or animal products. It’s high on the list of potential biological warfare agents and bioterrorism)
This video created in 2018 shows the heavily guarded Lugar Center, a U.S. funded (2.1 BILLION)Pentagon bio laboratory in the country of Georgia. Also shown is a map with military bio labs in former Soviet countries including the Ukraine, but also the Middle East, South East Asia, and Africa. Bulgarian journalist Dilyana Gaytandzhieva has been investigating the Pentagon labs in 25 countries around the world and has been given rare access to internal emails and memos from insiders. Locals describe accidents in workers that were swiftly covered up.
https://rumble.com/vx9h00-there-are-25-us-funded-biolabs-in-ukraine.html There are 25+ US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, which if breached, would release & spread deadly pathogens to US/world. We must take action now to prevent disaster. US/Russia/Ukraine/NATO/UN/EU must implement a ceasefire now around these labs until they’re secured & pathogens destroyed.
While critics state U.S. funding only pays for equipment and research, which are managed locally and without U.S. involvement, Pentagon official Robert Pope admits it is possible that not all biological pathogens of mass destruction were destroyed in the Ukraine which was part of the former Soviet Republic, but that the infrastructure to produce weapons is no longer there.
“Scientists being scientists, it wouldn’t surprise me if some of these strain collections in some of these laboratories still have pathogen strains that go all the way back to the origins of that program.” ~ Robert Pope
“If I were an intelligence analyst working for the Russian government, I would have to conclude that these laboratories, not knowing their purpose or intent, did represent a strategic threat to the Russian state and a potential biothreat risk. I can’t see how anyone wouldn’t conclude that.” ~ Dr. Malone
This news story states mainstream media, without any verification what so ever, has regurgitated verbatim a Pentagon “fact sheet” that these labs were created to fight TB and various live-stock diseases. Then they stated they were “securing them,” and finally said they have been “eliminating” Soviet bioweapons since 2005. The only problem is that was 17 years ago….
The war is causing unprecedented disruption to global supply chains, exacerbating fuel shortages and inducing chronic levels of inflation.
The war’s economic fallout will lead to a dramatic downsizing of the global workforce.
The war has significantly reduced Europe’s reliance on the Russian energy sector and reinforced the centrality of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and ‘net zero‘ emissions which lies at the heart of the Great Reset.
Food shortages will offer a major boon to the synthetic biology industry as the convergence of digital technologies with materials science and biology will radically transform the agricultural sector and encourage the adoption of plant-based and lab-grown alternatives on a global scale.
Russia’s exclusion from SWIFT foreshadows an economic reset which will generate precisely the kind of blowback necessary for corralling large swathes of the global population into a technocratic control grid.
The war marks a major inflection point in the globalist aspiration for a new international rules-based order anchored in Eurasia.
With speculation mounting over the war’s long term impact on bilateral trade flows between China and Europe, the Russia-Ukraine conflict will catapult Israel – a leading advocate of the Great Reset – to even greater international prominence.
Digital IDs are a central plank in the WEF’s Great Reset agenda and are to be streamlined across industries, supply chains and markets as a way of advancing the UN 2030 SDGs and delivering individualised and integrated services in future smart cities.
Europe is directly in the line of fire once a hybrid war between NATO and the Sino-Russia axis is underway.
Economic implications will be so disastrous that governments and the public sector will require a significant injection of private capital to address the financing shortfall.
A recent article by investigative journalist Janet Phelan, author of, At the Breaking Point of History: How Decades of U.S. Duplicity Enabled the Pandemic, details that under a politically binding agreement, the US is mandated to report any labs involving the US to the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC), but that the US has been remiss in doing so, and failed to report pivotal changes in domestic biological weapons legislation, which gave the US immunity from violating its own bioweapons laws, which is a big no, no. The article details her unsuccessful attempts to find out just how many US labs are in the Ukraine, as well as the fact her presentation to the BWC which accused the US with intention to launch a pandemic made an impact with Russian journalists, while US reporters were silent. She not only attempted to get answers from the BWC but from the UN, both of which are also silent. In this interview, Phelan states Biden lied about U.S. biological & chemical weapons stockpile. Clandestine U.S.-funded biolabs developed COVID-19. The gene sequence of COVID-19 was patented by Moderna in 2017 proving the virus is a man-madebioweapon.
The Ukrainian Ministry of Health today denies the presence of US Bio-safety labs in Ukraine. On their government website, which is amazingly still up and running even with the Russian invasion, they say
We refute Russian fakes about “military-biological programs.”
The Ministry of Health denies reports in the Russian media about alleged “emergency clean-up of traces of the US military-funded military-biological program” and “destruction of particularly dangerous pathogens” at the Poltava and Kharkiv Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
We emphasize once again that there are no “American laboratories” on the territory of Ukraine. All laboratory facilities that exist in Ukraine have a common goal – the indication and identification of infectious agents that have significant epidemic potential and / or international significance and are subject to international health regulations.
Also, the Ministry of Health of Ukraine draws attention to the fact that in the published documents, there is no particularly dangerous strain, which is so actively reported by the media of the aggressor.
This article refutes the Ukrainian Ministry of Health point by point.
There are US military-funded Biological laboratories in Ukraine
Could it be that it is all a “conspiracy theory”? No. It is not. The US Embassy in Ukraine has a website about its Biological Threat Reduction Program. (See link for article)
_________________
**Comment**
Well now, this might explain some things…..
Before you write this off, MSM actually reported on this back in 2015. There have been numerous outbreaks right in the vicinity of these labs. Private US contractors have been given diplomatic immunity for transporting deadly pathogens and human blood as “diplomatic cargo.” While MSM claims all of this isl false, they fail to debunk it. Now the US embassy official website is removing all evidence of Ukrainian bioweapons labs.
Remember when the ‘powers that be’ and the media immediately squelched any admission of US involvement with COVID? Watch this news report for a reminder:
Gravitas: US officials knew about China’s Wuhan cover-up?
March 10, 2021
Newly published documents from the US embassy in China reveal that US officials were aware of China’s cover-up in Wuhan. They flagged China’s incomplete health bulletins in January 2020.
Fauci knew everything yet nothing was revealed publicly.
If you lie for one issue, what’s to stop you from lying about another issue? Fauci’s been lying for 40 years.
Please note this news story hails from India. The US press is not only mute on Fauci’s corrupt dealings but he’s their media darling.
Circling back to the Ukraine:
Important quote:
All laboratories on the list state that the Donor is the US Department of Defense. If these laboratories are for health, why is the Department of Human and Health Services or Centers for Disease Control not involved?
The same biolabs that the US always denied existed / knew nothing about? U.S. Secretary of State Victoria Nuland – US working with Ukraine to prevent biological research facilities from falling into Russian hands confirming the existence of those labs.
The Russian ministry alleges it received documents that showed the Ukrainian Ministry of Health sent instructions to all biological laboratories in February to urgently destroy the stored stocks of dangerous pathogens such as plague, anthrax, tularemia, and cholera.
US Undersecretary of State Victoria Nuland testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on March 8:
“Uh, Ukraine has, uh, biological research facilities,” she answered nervously while fiddling around with a pen. “We are working with the Ukrainians to prevent any of those research materials from falling into the hands of Russian forces.” Rubio then asked a follow-up, leading-the-witness-type question to redirect animosity and anger towards Russia. Source
Nuland, who worked in the Bush II, Obama, and Biden administrations has been involved with the Ukraine since before the 2014 coup, and the Nunn-Lugar Act of 1991 specifically provides funding for biological weapons labs in Ukraine.
A leaked January 28, 2014 recording of a phone call between Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Geoffrey Pyatt not only revealed that Nuland helped orchestrate the coup, but also hand-picked the new government after President Viktor Yanukovych was removed from office. Nuland placed new Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk on that perch, declaring “f*ck the EU” as she cut them out from providing any input on the Ukraine regime change.
Nuland, described by some as the “Forrest Gump of US foreign policy” has been a key player in four presidencies, and held a background role in the Benghazi scandal, sending an email insisting removal of CIA talking points noting that they could be used to “beat the state department for not paying attention to agency warnings.” She has been heavily involved in the domestic affairs in the Ukraine since 2013. Biden was also involved with the coup. Nuland went on to become entangled with Christopher Steele – ex-British spy and author of the infamous dossier at the center of “Russia Gate,” who was instrumental in vilifying Russia and in shaping the US State Department’s Ukraine policy. Just yesterday, Donald Trump is suing Hillary Clinton and Steele(for damages & a jury trial) for the dossier, which was paid for by the Clinton campaign & the DNC, which he states was a plot to “weave a false narrative” that he was colluding with Russian actors. Special counsel Rober Mueller found no evidence of conspiracy or coordination between Trump and the Russians and many claims were confirmed as false while others have never been proven.
Hopefully this thickening plot demonstrates that nearly everyone is complicit in some fashion or another. If only the “good guys” wore white hats and the “bad guys” wore black. One thing’s for sure: “good guys” are increasingly hard to find.
SUMMARY:
The Russian Minister of Defense states components of biological weapons are being developed in the Ukraine in close proximity to Russian territory.
Please see top link for the list of pathogens.
Dr. Santiano states that bacteria in the medical field are limited to genus and species only and that the additional letters and numbers suggest these listed pathogens are not your everyday strain
He also states that if the labs are sponsored by the CDC, it’s likely that the pathogens were collected from patients globally but since the DOD sponsors them, they are most likely engineered and weaponized.
While antibiotics are effective for the pathogens listed, if they are bioweaponized or mutated to be antibiotic resistant, they won’t work. Also, it’s harder for the immune system to get a new virus or bacteria under control.
The bacteria listed can infect the lungs, intestines, and skin.
Notably absent in the pathogens “to be destroyed” are numerous pathogens causing outbreaks around the labs in the Ukraine in previous years. Their absence might indicate that only 1 document was intercepted and there’s more out there.
Go here for info on these outbreaks, a map of the labs and where they are located, as well as information on how according to the2005 Agreement between the US DoD and the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, the Ukrainian government is prohibited from public disclosure of sensitive information about the US program and Ukraine is obliged to transfer to the US Department of Defense (DoD) dangerous pathogens for biological research. The Pentagon has been granted access to certain state secrets of Ukraine in connection with the projects under their agreement.
Also, he has an updated list of COVID articles well worth your time as well as COVID treatments.
Fact sheets featured on the U.S. Embassy of Ukraine website, found via Internet Archive, link to several documents detailing what appears to be U.S. government investments for select laboratories in Ukraine.
The fact sheet (pdf) for the Kharkiv Oblast Laboratory Center, for example, has a paragraph that reads: “USG Investment – Total cost of laboratory: USD$1,638,375 (USD$1,195,398 for Design & Construction; USD$442,977 for lab equipment and furniture).” Another line reads “Donor—the Department of Defense of the United States of America.”
Fact sheets for the other 10 laboratories have similar paragraphs.
The Pentagon didn’t respond to a request for comment by press time. Source
Keep an open mind and refuse to jump on any bandwagon.
Unfortunately, despite continued forthcoming information, even Lyme organizations are picking sides: NatCapLyme Stands with Ukraine. And now Pfizer says it will stop clinical trials in Russia and donate all of its profits from the country to humanitarian aid efforts in Ukraine. (The Hill)
Gravitas Plus: Why the West is winning the Information War
First, it influenced elections. Now Big Tech is directing the course of conflicts. It’s pushing the western narrative & suppressing Russia’s. Platforms have become battlefields, data has been weaponized. Palki Sharma Upadhyay exposes the West’s monopoly on information flow.
And just today another tech company called Discord is attacking “health misinformation,” which of course is subjective and a blatant form of censorship. A person in charge of moderating Discord’s server states this puts him in a position of being a justice of the Supreme Court which has to interpret obscure passages. He also points out:
They ban pro-Russia propaganda while excusing pro-Ukraine propaganda. They censored claims that COVID came from a lab (which turned out to be plausible), while also censoring people who questioned CDC guidance (some of which turned out to be false). Fact-checkers labeled defenses of Kyle Rittenhouse false while the media defamed him. It is banned to say ivermectin treats COVID, but it is legal to call it a “horse de-wormer” (The drug also is prescribed for humans, so this makes about as much sense as ridiculing penicillin as “fungus”). The official sources they use to determine truth have lied or repeated lies about every issue from inflation to Jussie Smollett. Source
In November 2020, the FBI raided a Project Veritas Journalist’s home.Project Veritas, using investigative journalism, has exposed damning information on the COVID injections. Some examples:
FDA exec states“Biden wants to innoculate as many people as possible.” As well as, “Almost a billion dollars a year going into FDA’s budget from the people we regulate.”
Military Documents about gain of function contradict Fauci testimony under oath.
Pfizer scientist states “Your antibodies are probably better than ‘vaccination.'” Scientist also admits COVID antibodies pass “through the umbilical cord” to child during pregnancy and that Pfizer’s jab “just doesn’t work” in some people.
A nurse whistleblower on record stating there was possible botched administration of COVID “vax” on children, and that “some got the wrong one.”
Whistleblower shows leaked Pfizer internal emails from the chief scientific officer and senior director which state, “We want to avoid having the information on the fetal cells floating out there.”
Two J&J employees caught stating kids shouldn’t get COVID shots, but adults who don’t comply with mandates should be ‘inconvenienced.’ One states, “don’t get the Johnson & Johnson [COVID shot], I didn’t tell you though.”
FDA economist on record stating, “Go to the unvaccinated and blow [COVID shot] it into them. Blow dart it into them. Also states, “I think there needs to be a registry of people who aren’t ‘vaccinated’, although that’s sounding very [much like Nazi] Germany.”
Doctor on camera stating: “The government doesn’t want to show that the darn ‘vaccine’ is full of s _ _ t.” The same doctor admits seeing myocarditis due to the ‘vaccine’ but states, “But now, they’re not going to blame the ‘vaccine.'” The doctor then states, that they are not reporting, “because they want to shove it under the mat.”
Nurses on camera admitting that they have seen “a lot” of people that got sick with side-effects after the shots.
When asked about who is reporting to VAERS about the reactions a nurse states, “nobody, because it takes a half an hour to write the d _ _ n thing.”
Nurse came forward due to the death of a colleague who survived working in a COVID unit who was forced to take the jab to keep her job. The colleague didn’t want to take the shot.
Welcome to the muddy waters of “The New Normal,” where black is white and up is down.
Massachusetts to Reduce ‘Significant Overcount’ of COVID-19 Deaths
By Harry Lee
March 11, 2022Updated: March 11, 2022
The Massachusetts Public Health Department announced Thursday that the state would lower its COVID-19 death count by 3,700 due to new measuring criteria being implemented. (See link for article)
Important quote:
“Our approach proved to be too expansive and led to a significant overcount of deaths in Massachusetts,” Public Health Commissioner Margret Cooke told the State House News Service.
As of March 9, Massachusetts reported 23,732 confirmed and probable COVID-19 deaths since the pandemic. The figure will drop to around 20,000 on March 14, when the department starts using the new criteria.
That’s roughly about 15 percent of the total death toll.
DeSantis, Medical Panel Voice Concerns Over Lockdowns, Lack of Trust Post COVID-19
By Jannis Falkenstern
March 8, 2022Updated: March 8, 2022
PUNTA GORDA, Florida–Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis met with 11 medical professionals in West Palm Beach on March 7 to evaluate the past two years of lockdowns and mandates and their effect on society, at a live virtual event co-hosted by the state surgeon general Dr. Joseph Ladapo. (See link for article)
SUMMARY:
The panel made up of medical professionals from private practice to academia from all over the U.S. agreed on the following:
two years of mandates and lockdowns did little to deter the virus
there is now a lack of trust in the medical establishment and the CDC due to politicization
we should never forget the overarching government abuse of powers, data, as well as the dishonesty, and unethical behavior
the gov. & medical agencies should be held accountable. If we forget, it can happen again.
The government has invested over a billion dollars in marketing vaccines to citizens.
government spending estimates for the development and manufacturing of COVID shots are between $18 billion and $23 billion.
The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the Biomedical Research and Development Authority (BARDA) alone has spent $19.3 billion on COVID-19 shot development.
In addition, Lisa Cornish projected $39.5 billion in US spending.
In 2021, over $10 billion was gained by just 8 share-holders of Pfizer & Moderna.
Physicians have been heavily criticized, censored, fired, and banned for even speaking of early treatments. The FDA has had an active role in this, and the Feds are giving tech companies until May, 2022 to rat-out those engaging in “misinformation.”
Hospitals receive payments for testing every patient for COVID, every COVID diagnosis and every ‘COVID death,’ as well as any time they use remdesivir and mechanical ventilation.
Early on in the COVID pandemic, people suspected that the deaths attributed to the infection were exaggerated. There was plenty of evidence for this. For starters, hospitals were instructed and incentivized to mark any patient who had a positive COVID test and subsequently died within a certain time period as a COVID death.
At the same time, we knew that the PCR test was unreliable, producing inordinate amounts of false positives. Now, the truth is finally starting to come out and, as suspected, the actual death toll is vastly lower than we were led to believe.
COVID Deaths Have Been Vastly Overcounted
In the video below, Dr. John Campbell reviews recent data released by the U.K. government in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. (See link for article)
Freedom of Information Discussion with Dr. John Campbell
____________________
SUMMARY:
UK health secretary admitted daily figures are unreliable as people continue to die from things unrelated to COVID but are included due to a positive test.
40% of patients counted as hospitalized COVID cases were not even admitted due to COVID symptoms. They simply tested positive.
Of the 17,371 who had COVID-19 as the sole cause of death, 13,597 were 65 or older. The average age of death in the U.K. from COVID in 2021 was 82.5 years. The projected life expectancy in the U.K. is 79 for men and 82.9 for women. This hardly constitutes an emergency, least of all for healthy school- and working-age individuals.
Campell shows excess cancer deaths due to delayed diagnosis and inability to get treatment due to lockdowns.
US data suggest a similar pattern of exaggerated COVID death statistics. CDC’s Walensky stated that 77.8% of people who had received the COVID jab yet died from/with COVID also had, on average, four comorbidities. She admitted that the risk of death is only for the sickest among us, whether you are ‘vaccinated’ or not.
A 2020 study found 88% of hospitalized COVID patients in New York City had two or more comorbidities,6.3% had one underlying health condition and 6.1% had none.This was before COVID shots.
CDC 2020 data showed only 6% of the total death count had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death. The remaining 94% had had an average of 2.6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that contributed to their deaths.
Most COVID deaths were likely due to ventilator malpractice:
80% of COVID-19 patients in NYC who were placed on ventilators died
66% of ventilated COVID patients died in the U.K.
86% of ventilated patients in Wuhan died
Despite this, mechanical ventilation is “standard of care” to this day
There are numerous safe alternatives to ventilation including:
Hyperbaric oxygen treatment
nasal cannulas – which are noninvasive
prone positioning, a technique where patients lay on their stomachs to aid breathing
UChicago Medicine found that combining proning and high-flow nasal cannulas brought patient oxygen levels from around 40% to 80% and 90%
The article states that for breathing difficulties, proning can be used at home and to try to avoid spending a lot of time lying flat on your back
US hospitals lose federal funding if they administer treatments that are not “approved.” They also receive incentives for the following:
COVID testing for all patients
COVID diagnoses
Admitting a “COVID patient”
Use of remdesivir (which has been shown to cause severe organ damage)
Use of mechanical ventilation
COVID deaths (coroners are also given bonuses)
Hospitals have also waived patient rights making them prisoners of the hospital.
Renz and a team of data analysts have estimated that more than 800,000 deaths in America’s hospitals, in COVID-19 and other patients, have been caused by approaches restricting fluids, nutrition, antibiotics, effective antivirals, anti-inflammatories, and therapeutic doses of anti-coagulants.
Renz showed CMS data from Texas hospitals which showed 84.9% % of all patients died after more than 96 hours on a ventilator.
Mercola states you should have what you need on hand when symptoms arise and that it’s always best to treat COVID symptoms immediately and aggressively. For example:
The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe
Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that coached him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis incorrectly
The notion of asymptomatic spread turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy or a threat, furthering fear and control
The artificially imposed state of incoherence that’s been enacted during the pandemic is described as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots
Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which is being violated as people are forced to get experimental shots
Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom
Prior to 2020, if you heard the term “lockdown” you might think of something that happens in a prison — not in a free society. This mechanism of control has since become commonplace — not among prisoners but among the free — with repercussions that are only beginning to be understood.
The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe. Already banned by Facebook and YouTube,1 the film starts at the beginning of the pandemic, when we were told lockdowns were necessary to “flatten the curve.”
This was supposed to be a short-term, 15-day event in the U.S., but the narrative soon changed to ongoing restrictions. As Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, explained, people have historically quarantined the sick, but quarantining healthy people, as has occurred for the past two years, has no scientific backing or historic precedence.2
“Given this virus represents, at most, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than seasonal influenza, and a less risk, a smaller risk, to almost everyone else who’s younger and fit,” Yeadon says, “it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn’t need to do anything — lockdowns, masks, testing, vaccines even.”3
Questionable Practices Urged for COVID-19 Diagnosis
Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that seemed to be coaching him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis in situations where he wouldn’t have previously used influenza or any other specific viral diagnosis without first testing for it. He said:4
“What struck me right away was I felt like I was being coached to go ahead and use COVID-19 without using the same standards of precision that I would for other things. If I’m going to make a diagnosis, I believe as a physician I have an obligation to use the tools available to me to nail it down with as much certainty as possible.
And it seemed to me that the Department of Health, and the link to this CDC document that said you could diagnose COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate … those two documents, in tandem, went against everything that I had been taught or doing for the last 35 years.”
Even Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Health, is featured in the film stating that even if you died of a clear alternate cause, if you had COVID-19 at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. “Everyone who is listed as a COVID death, doesn’t mean that was the cause of the death,” she says.5
In January 2020, the PCR test for COVID-19 came out, which allowed health officials to define COVID-19 “cases.” If the test was positive, it counted as a case — it didn’t matter if you have symptoms or not. Reiner Fuellmich, global fraud attorney, founder of the Corona Investigative Committee, pointed out, “It’s never, in the history of mankind, in the history of medicine, there’s never been testing of healthy people.”6
Yeadon agrees that mass testing of people with no symptoms has no scientific basis. Rather, he says, “It’s just a way to frighten people.”7 The rising “cases,” based on PCR testing, is what built the crisis. But counting cases was only measuring the activity of testing; the more that testing occurred, the more cases that were found.
‘Fear Everyone’ Became the Message
June 8, 2020, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced that asymptomatic people could transmit COVID-19. That same day, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that people who have COVID-19 without any symptoms “rarely” transmit the disease to others. In a dramatic about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement just one day later.8
In the days that followed, media and health officials ramped up fear by claiming that you could be sickened by virtually anyone, even when they appeared to be healthy. “This idea that … you can be ill even though you have no symptoms and you can be a … virus threat to someone else even though you have no symptoms, that’s also invented in 2020,” Yeadon says.9
Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist, former director of research with the French National Institute of Health, is among those who have noticed something off from the start. “I was very puzzled since the very beginning … I was alert to the fact that what we were living was not quite right.”10
She notes that the notion of asymptomatic spread is terrifying because it turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy, because they could be exposing you to SARS-CoV-2.
“This is actually terrible because it denies the capacity of a person to be a healthy person. Because if asymptomatic [spread] exists, then who is healthy? No one.”
What’s more, the “proof” of asymptomatic spread is flawed and fraudulent. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article suggesting the transmission of COVID-19 is possible from an asymptomatic carrier in January 2020.11
It was based on a 33-year-old businessman who had met with his business partner from Shanghai, then developed a fever and productive cough. The next evening, he felt better and went back to work January 27.
The writers reported the partner had been “well with no signs or symptoms of infection, but had become ill on her flight back to China, where she tested positive for 2019-nCoV on January 26.” From this case study, they theorized the virus could be transmitted from asymptomatic carriers. An important point was left out, which is that the researchers did not speak with the partner from Shanghai before publication.
However, Germany’s public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), did speak with the woman on the phone, and she reported she did have symptoms while in Germany.12 So she was not asymptomatic after all.
In a State of Incoherence, People Crave Normalcy
The pandemic has twisted reality, leaving the public in a mental fog. “You’re regularly pledging obedience to things which are not logical,” Catherine Austin-Fitts, assistant secretary, Bush Sr. administration and investment adviser with Solari, Inc., says.13WHO has changed definitions of herd immunity and pandemic, literally altering reality, and this is just one example.
Censorship and campaigns to discredit those who speak out against the narrative are additional control mechanisms that distort the truth. Bishop Schneider of Kazakhstan says the pandemic measures are very similar to Soviet times where he lived, in that there was only one narrative, and if you said there was another meaning, you were declared an enemy.
“When you had another opinion, they said, ‘You are a conspiracy group. You have a conspiracy theory. You have hate speech. This expression, hate speech, came from the communists.”14 It’s psychological manipulation, based on fear, which makes people act totally irrational. The artificially imposed state of incoherence was even described by Austin-Fitts as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots:15
“Human beings crave coherence. And so if you can put them in a state of incoherence they will literally do anything they can to get back to coherence. It’s a typical torture tactic. ‘If you just do what I want, I will allow you to go back to a state of coherence.’ So, if you just accept the [vaccine] passports, you’ll be free. Or if you get the vaccination, you’ll just be free.”
Further, by declaring small businesses as “nonessential” during lockdowns, they get shut down, while Amazon, Walmart and other big box stores can take over their market share. A major transfer of wealth occurred away from small family-owned businesses to very large, publicly owned businesses that benefited from the digital economy. In the meantime, Austin-Fitts explains:16
“The people on Main St. have to keep paying off their credit cards or their mortgage, so they’re in a debt trap and they’re desperate to get cashflow to cover their debts and expenses.
In the meantime, you have the Federal Reserve institute a form of quantitative easing where they’re buying corporate bonds, and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance — or their banks can — at 0% to 1%, when everyone on Main St. is paying 16% to 17% to their credit cards, without income.
So basically now you’ve got them over a barrel and you can take away their market share, and generally they can’t afford to do what they say because they’re too busy trying to find money to feed their kids.”
New Control Systems Are Being Engineered
If a few people want to control many, how can you get the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them realizing and resisting? “The perfect thing,” Austin-Fitts says, is invisible enemies, like viruses.17 This ramps up fear so the public believes they need the government to protect them. Another effective tactic is “divide and conquer,” and the media plays an important role in this, dividing people over shots and masks, for instance.
“What COVID-19 is,” Austin-Fitts explains, “is the institution of controls necessary to convert the planet from the democratic process to technocracy. So what we’re watching is a change in control and an engineering of new control systems. So think of this as a coup d’état. It’s much more like a coup d’état than a virus.”18
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former public health official and member of German parliament, agrees, stating that pandemic responses have “nothing to do with hygiene. It has to do with criminology.“19 The global injection campaign is another form of control, one that’s forcing the public to receive experimental shots.
Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.
But in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the shots — which are only beginning to be uncovered. People are being forced into the shots due to mandates and loss of jobs and personal freedoms, like the ability to travel freely and attend business and social events.
In the End, Truth Will Win
A revolution is occurring, and the experts are hopeful that people will awaken to common sense and resist the totalitarian control that is threatening to take over the globe. Instead, society can be regenerated if people come together and fight back against the encroachment on our liberties.
Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom. “If they want to make us a machine, if they want to make us slaves, we say no,” Wodarg says. “… We don’t need you anymore, we are many … we don’t have to be afraid of any pandemic.”20
About the Director
I believe in bringing quality to my readers, which is why I wanted to share some information about the filmmaker, James Patrick, from “Planet Lockdown.” Here is a little more about him and what went in to making this film. Thank you James for sharing with us.
What was your inspiration for making this film?
I was in Spain when the lockdowns started, studying a PHD in economics. I escaped to southern France and a week later back to the states. I immediately saw the lockdowns as an economic takedown of the middle class rather than a virus mitigation strategy.
I looked into the academic reference of lockdown as a strategy and they were only mentioned twice and strongly recommended against as the damages would be worse than any benefit.
As an ancestor of Patrick Henry and passionate lover of human liberty, I was so upset by the lockdowns and what they meant for our future, I needed to do something about it. Within a few months I embarked on making a documentary film. The situation developed so quickly I began putting the full interviews out and it became an interview series as well.
I was able to get the best and brightest experts in the world to sit down and tell me their story. It is a high level, intimate look at what happened these last two years, from 2 weeks of lockdown to flatten the curve to Lockouts for the unvaccinated.
What do you hope people take away from the film?
The film takes the viewer on a journey through the whole COVID saga. The film and the full interviews forms an educational body of work that helps the public understand what is going on, how we got here, where are we and where this is headed if we don’t put a stop to this. Enough damage has been done. We have to make sure this never happens again or a lot worse things will happen.
Where do the proceeds to your film go?
Proceeds to the project go to cover the expenses of the film and ongoing interview series. These include travel, equipment, and payment for cameramen, sound, edits, audio technicians and web hosting expenses. We have done this project on a shoestring budget and donations are critical to keeping this high quality content coming to earn the public about what is happening and what is to come.
No other film project is addressing the situation from an international perspective, which is required to have a full understanding of what is happening. This is a global operation. We work with colleagues in UK, EU and Africa to capture the situation. We are doing this project as a public service and it isn’t free. To date it has been driven by people contributing their time unpaid, myself especially, so donations help covers these out of pocket expenses incurred.
— Court-ordered release runs risk of “cherry picking and taking things out of context”
by Amanda D’Ambrosio, Enterprise & Investigative Writer, MedPage Today March 7, 2022
The FDA turned over thousands of documents related to its review of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine last week, marking the first of several releases mandated by a court in Texas earlier this year.
The agency released 55,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine review documents last Tuesday, following a loss in court months earlier that forced it to expedite its process to make the information available to the public. In a January court order, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released — totaling more than 300,000 pages. (See link for article)
Nine pages of side effects listed, some have not been confirmed. Nearly 159,000 side effects were listed which means each person on average reported 3-4 different side-effects.
Reporting is voluntary and the magnitude of under reporting is unknown; however, if we are to look at a 2011 report by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, VAERS only captures fewer than 1% of adverse reactions. It also only captures less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events, and only 1-13% of serious events are reported to the FDA. Historically, under reporting is prolific.
Dr. Jesse Santiano lists the Pfizer adverse events of “special interest” and states these are events that should be monitored by the drug or “vaccine” company. The events can be severe or not serious, but can lead to a serious medical condition. He also states that more than 95% of the events listed are negatively impacting and life-changing. Most doctors and nurses are unaware of this list, created by Pfizer itself on conditions to look for after people get COVID shots. Anyone getting these or other reactions (not listed) should report them to Pfizer and VAERS even if you received a shot from a different manufacturer. Dr. Santiano has listed the conditions in alphabetical order, many with links for you to read about them, as well as research articles. You should also check out his updated list of COVID articles – all great resources.
SUMMARY:
It took a nonprofit suing the FDA for COVID shot data to be released to the public.
The FDA redacts confidential business and private info as well as trade secrets.
The court concluded the release of data is of “paramount public importance” that is “necessary”.
The article is quick to point out that “anti-vax” advocates have already capitalized on the release of data and immediately calls out Children’s Health Defense, run by John F. Kennedy who has stated repeatedly he is not “anti-vax,” yet facts be damned. It’s more important to name calland bully than present facts.
Predictably, the FDA is very worried about people cherry-picking data, which ironically is also supposedly why the CDC was recently caught red-handed withholding data for more than a year. This is where we should hear the booming voice of Colonel Jessup in “A Few Good Men”:http://
Then, Medpage finger points at specific doctors they state are “known for spreading false or misleading information during the pandemic.” The bullying and name calling is tangible. And now, the Feds are giving Big Tech until May 3, 2022 to rat out those engaging in “misinformation,” with the new FDA chief throwing his weight behind it too.
Speaking of “cherry picking”, the CDC reports that 6 months of U.S. Data finds adverse events caused by COVID shots to be “minor and transient,” and that few patients sought medical care. This mirage is quite easy to create when you just simply deny causality between the injections and the adverse events and deaths. Similarly with Lyme/MSIDS, the CDC uses it’s own study to stamp out any threat to their narrative that COVID ‘vaccines’ are ‘safe and effective’ and are the only recourse despite effectivetreatments that are heavily censored and banned. CDC’s Walensky belatedly admitted that they relied too heavily of ‘vaccines’ as a “cure all,” suspiciously right before mid-term elections.
Reality; however, paints a far different picture:
“They coded the deaths. They said, “Did the vaccine cause [death] or was there some other cause? 86% of the time, there’s no other cause. 50% of the deaths occur within two days of taking the shot; 80% occur within a week.” ~ Dr McCullough
Now in March, 2022 we find that a CDC peer-reviewed study shows that COVID injection DEATHS represent 1.3% of reported side-effects and 6.6% were serious. This of course led the CDC to quietly adjust their metrics for measuring COVID risk, purposely manipulating to make it appear the pandemic was easing up. We went from 90% of the country in high-risk red zones to overnight, having less than 30% of the country in high-risk orange zones. The CDC constantlymanipulates and withholds data. Remember that historically VAERS only gets about a 1% capture rate.
But the CDC is far from alone. For decades the FDA has allowed drug companies to cherry-pick data to get approval for drugs. When a drug fails, Big Pharma only publishes papers with positive results and sweeps the negative ones under the rug. A 2013 book settles the point conclusively: industry research only gives positive results. And this well-written article in Frontiers states that Big Pharma takes advantage of medical science by doing it’s own research and smoothly integrating it with medical science. This has been blatantly seen in the era of COVID.
FDA “cherry-picked” evidence to push cloned-animal foods, and downplayed evidence of health risks.
The FDA has been accused of using back-channels to get expensive, ineffective drugs approved.
The FDA ignores data and gives Pfizer shots a favorable conclusion. Number of doses (denominator) was redacted, preventing any computation of rates and risks. Isn’t that convenient? This also means the FDA may be in contempt of court.
AstraZeneca has been accused of including “outdated information” in touting effectiveness. An independent panel scolded the company for “cherry-picking” data.
A pathologist has called out the FDA for “glossing over” potential risks of an mRNA vaccine while concealing its true efficacy. This same pathologist filed a “stay of action” against the FDA for using faulty PCR tests in the “vaccine” trials.
San Diego scientists call out FDA Commissioner over “cherry-picked” COVID plasma data, and that support for the treatment is unfounded.
Regarding boosters, the FDA’s been accused of performing hat tricks, as they made the decision with NO DATA. Further, every member of the ACIP which reviews the level of evidence to vote for boosters has conflicts of interest with vaccine manufacturers.
In this article we learn that Children’s Health Defense Fund has filed a lawsuit against the FDA due to the fact you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That’s against the law, but the government has done it anyway. The request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but CHD is still pursuing the case.
I’m sure there are thousands of more examples, but it’s laughable that the FDA is worried about “cherry-picking” when it does it with abandon.
Let us never forget that when Pfizer applied for FDA approval, they were completely aware of almost 159,000 adverse events but wanted this fact sealed for 75 years.
And these adverse events are not little fevers with some itching or swelling:
Acute kidney injury
Acute flaccid myelitis
Anti-sperm antibody positive
Brain stem embolism
Brain stem thrombosis
Cardiac arrest
Cardiac failure
Cardiac ventricular thrombosis
Cardiogenic shock
Central nervous system vasculitis
Death neonatal
Deep vein thrombosis
Encephalitis brain stem
Encephalitis hemorrhagic
Frontal lobe epilepsy
Foaming at mouth
Epileptic psychosis
Facial paralysis
Fetal distress syndrome
Gastrointestinal amyloidosis
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
Hashimoto’s encephalopathy
Hepatic vascular thrombosis
Herpes zoster reactivation
Immune-mediated hepatitis
Interstitial lung disease
Jugular vein embolism
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
Liver injury
Low birth weight
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
Myocarditis, neonatal seizure
Pancreatitis, pneumonia
Stillbirth
Tachycardia
Temporal lobe epilepsy
Testicular autoimmunity
Thrombotic cerebral infarction
Type 1 diabetes mellitus
Venous thrombosis neonatal
Vertebral artery thrombosis.
There were 1,246 other medical conditions following the shots, over 25,000 of which were nervous system disorders, 17,000 musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and 14,000 gastrointestinal disorders
The fly in the ointment on COVID shot efficacy
Regarding efficacy, please remember that ‘vaccine’ manufacturers did a ‘slight of hand’ to obtain their highly touted positive results: they simply discarded absolute risk. When absolute risk is included, COVID injections are 1% or less effective. They also purposely omitted those with natural immunity because those who have recovered from COVID are at risk for a hyperimmune response after “vaccination,” and some WILL actually DIE. Big Pharma didn’t want that fact to be exposed. These jabs lose any effectiveness they might have within weeks and don’t work at all for variants.
Dr. Cole states that whatever small benefit(0.345%) the injections had early on during the middle of an epidemic with a fast-moving virus is completely diminished by the fact natural immunity and early treatments, that are far more effective than “vaccines”, were completely neglected and suppressed.
Many do not know that the flu shot is also a “bust” and has been found to be only 16% effective against the predominant strain.
enter cell nuclei, suppressing DNA repair engine of the human body, which could potentially unleash an explosion of cancer, immunodeficiency, autoimmune disorders and accelerated aging
Further, they are using outdated population estimates that grossly under count the actual number of the unvaccinated, which translates into inflated estimates of COVID cases. Second, they appear to be counting every person for whom they cannot verify vaccination stated as unvaccinated which also translates into overstatement of COVID cases in the unvaccinated and the understatement of cases for the ‘vaccinated.‘ Go here for an excellent read on how public health agencies are using fake science to support their narrative. The CDC was recently called out on this.
A German insurance company fires CEO for releasing COVID shot injury data and then scrubs the data from the website.The released data suggests ‘authorities’ are significantly under reporting injuries.
The NIH got Forbes to simply delete a reporter from their employment for simply writing a factual article about Fauci.
A FOIA request showed emails with Fauci and NIH head, Collins, communicating the need for a quick and devastating published take-down of the Great Barrington Declaration. They conspired with the media to this effect and a day later Google began censoring search results for it. Both men have gone on record stating the Declaration is “dangerous,” “ridiculous,” and “total nonsense.”Mainstream and social media giants then began a smear campaign against it and the epidemiologists behind it, calling the Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford doctors “fringe,” despite the fact 928,000 have signed the declaration.
At least 12 mysterious deaths of CDC scientists. Could they have been deleted for knowing too much or threatening to speak up?
These corrupt ‘authorities’ will blame anything but the obvious thing. Further, 6 months does not even begin to answer questions about safety and efficacy on a fast-tracked, experimental – never before used in humansgene therapy that is linked to more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.
Lets review some facts:
FDA FOIA data shows over 1,200 deaths in the first 3 MONTHS of the COVID jab and TENS OF THOUSANDS of adverse events. Please remember in 1976 the Swine flu program was halted in nine states after just 3 deaths. The entire program ended with only 20% of the population vaccinated due to reports of Guillain-Barre.
One in nine adolescents suffered an adverse event.
Myocarditis risk is higher from COVID shots than from COVID. It’s three times higher using Pfizer.
While a multitude of experts stated the ‘pandemic’ was over a year ago, the US Senate just passed a bill to end COVID, which will likely be voted against by the House of Representatives and vetoed by Biden. None of this is shocking as an internal memo shows Biden and the CDC are following advice from a public opinion research firm, not science.
Bought out public health ‘experts’ have detailed a frightening plan focusing on 12 key areas for living with COVID:
expensive MERV 13 filtration or HEPA filters in all public buildings which should be monitored and publicly graded. (imagine the expense and power-grabs if this goes into effect)
another “Warp Speed” program with advanced purchase agreements and incentives(think billions to Big Pharma & our government) to produce an oral antiviral cocktail, despite the fact treatments already exist that are cheap and effective.
keep pushing “vaccines” despite proof the COVID jabs are worthless, dangerous, and don’t stop transmission, infection, hospitalization, or death.
More testing, despite it’s utter failure. They want to track, track, and track some more – further eroding individual freedom.
Under the auspice of “Long COVID” they want a national research program that includes health, “vaccination,” and sociodemograhic data. Another tyrannical power grab for your personal information which isn’t anybody’s business but yours.
Rather than admit COVID “vaccines” are worthless and dangerous, they want to address workforce shortages with a “pool of flexible healthcare workers” rather than rehire workers who chose to forego the shots. (An obvious breach of our constitutional rights & a form of segregation)
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 