Madison Area Lyme Support Group

Excerpt:

In a July 1, 2021, commentary in The Lancet Microbe,³ Piero Olliaro, Els Torreele and Michel Vaillant also argue for the use of absolute risk reduction when discussing vaccine efficacy with the public. They too went through the calculations, coming up with the following:

• Pfizer/BioNTech — Relative risk reduction: 95%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.84%
• Moderna — Relative risk reduction: 94%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
• Gamaleya (Sputnic V) — Relative risk reduction: 91%. Absolute risk reduction: 0.93%
• Johnson & Johnson — Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.2%
• AstraZeneca/Oxford — Relative risk reduction: 67%. Absolute risk reduction: 1.3%

These injections are abysmal at protecting you AND they do not provide immunity.  Bhakdi also refuses the narrative that they reduce severity of symptoms.

He states:

“They showed absolutely zero [benefit in the clinical trials],” he says. “This is the ridiculousness. People don’t understand that they’re being fooled and have been fooled all along. Let’s take the one of these Pfizer trials: 20,000 healthy people were vaccinated and another 20,000 people were not vaccinated.

And then they observed, over a period of 12 weeks or so, how many cases they found in the vaccinated group and how many cases they found the non-vaccinated. What they found was that less than 1% of the vaccinated group got COVID-19 and less than 1% in the non-vaccinated group also got COVID-19.

The difference was 0.8 to 0.1%, which is nothing, considering the fact that they were not even looking at severe cases. They were looking at people with a positive PCR test — which as we all now know is worthless — plus one symptom, which could be cough or fever.

That is not a severe case of COVID-19. Any vaccination that is going to get authorized must be shown to protect against severe illness and death, and this has definitely not been shown. So, forget authorization. It can’t be authorized, not by any normal means.

Now [the COVID injections do not have] full authorization, it’s an emergency authorization, which again is absolute bullshit, since we know the infection fatality rate of this disease or virus is not greater than that of seasonal flu. John Ioannidis has published these numbers, which have never been contested by anyone in the world and cannot be contested.

If you are under 70 years of age and have no severe preexisting illness, you can hardly die [from SARS-CoV-2 infection]. So, there is no fatality rate that can be reduced.

And for people who are elderly and have preexisting illness, as we know from Dr. Peter McCullough and his colleagues’ work, there are very good means and medicines to treat this virus so that the fatality rates go down another 70 to 80%, which means there is no ground for emergency use whatsoever.

This means the FDA should be able to be forced to retract this emergency use authorization — unless they are in league with whoever wants to do this.”

Lastly, Lyme/MSIDS patients should be concerned with the issue of COVID injections triggering latent viruses, bacterial infections and even cancer. This has happened with other vaccines.  According to the article, these jabs can decimate your lymph nodes.  Badly needed Lymphocytes will die, causing inflammation, which patients already have a lot of.  Lymphocytes that don’t immeditely die take up the mRNA and start producing the toxic spike protein which will be recognized as “virus producers” and get attacked by the complement system.  This is creating a war between your immune cells.  Similar to Bartonella, your lymph nodes can swell and hurt.  Malfunctioning lymphocytes can allow latent infections to activate.  Doctors are reporting that shingles, lupus, herpes, Epstein-Barr, tuberculosis and other infections are emerging as a side effect of the shots, as well as certain cancers can also be affected.

The article recommends that IF you have already gotten the jab, don’t get any more as effects will magnify with each successive shot. Dr. Bhakdi admits that he doesn’t know if anything can be done to reverse the effects of these shots, but if you develop infection symptoms, he recommends treatment with:

• hydroxychloroquine and/or ivermectin, such as the Zelenko protocol
• MATH+ protocols,⁵ which have proven their effectiveness
• Nebulized hydrogen peroxide can also be used for prevention and treatment of COVID-19, as detailed in Dr. David Brownstein’s case paper⁶ and Dr. Thomas Levy’s free e-book, “Rapid Virus Recovery.”
• Home treatment protocol by AAPS
• Whichever treatment protocol you use, make sure you begin treatment as soon as possible, ideally at first onset of symptoms.

Do not be frightened by the latest ivermectin scare.  Out of desperation, due to the stupidity of doctors, these poor people are self-treating with animal medicine which often comes as a paste making it more difficult to accurately measure. It also may have more impurities in it. If you need ivermectin, and your own spineless doctor will not consider it, please go to America’s Frontline doctors, for their telemedicine service. As you can read on their website, pharmacies are having trouble stocking it due to high demand so patients are being prioritized based on symptoms. They are asking for everyone to “remain honorable” and tell the doctor the truth. They state you will receive your meds relatively quickly.

It’s important to realize you may actually be more prone to serious infection, not less, if you’ve taken the jab.