Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

How to Protect Yourself From TBEV, Which Isn’t “New”

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/england-ticks-symptoms-splash-europe-

How to protect yourself from the new rare tick-borne disease

Tick-borne encephalitis virus has arrived in the UK. Lisa Salmon finds out more.
Lisa Salmon

April 5, 2023
(Alamy/PA)
(Alamy/PA)

A virus carried by ticks has been found in the UK, and health experts are warning that people need to protect themselves from being bitten.

The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) says the species of tick which carry tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV) is widespread in the UK.

They stress that although the risk to the public is low, it’s important for people to protect themselves against being bitten by the tiny bugs, which can also transmit the much more common Lyme disease.

“The risk of tick borne encephalitis virus in England is very low, but as ticks can carry other infections, it is as important as ever to be ‘tick aware’,” says Dr Claire Gordon from the UKHSA. “Take steps to reduce your chances of being bitten when outdoors in areas where ticks thrive, such as moorlands and woodlands, and remember to check for ticks and remove them promptly.”

(See link for article)

_________________

SUMMARY:

Thanks to a Federal Court Order, FDA Confirms Graphene is in mRNA Shots

https://expose-news.com/2023/04/02/fda-confirms-graphene-is-in-the-covid-vaccines/

BREAKING: FDA confirms Graphene Oxide is in the mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines after being forced to publish Confidential Pfizer Documents by order of the US Federal Court

The FDA had initially attempted to delay the release of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine safety data for 75 years, despite approving the injection after only 108 days of a safety review on December 11th, 2020.

However, a group of scientists and medical researchers sued the FDA under FOIA to force the release of hundreds of thousands of documents related to the licensing of the Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine.

In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.

One of the most recent documents published by the FDA saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

(See link for article)

________________

SUMMARY With Added Updates:

  • NIH developed the stabilized version of the spike protein in 2019 and NIAID & Moderna had a COVID “vaccine” candidate as early as Dec., 2019, all before the identification of COVID. Intelligence also shows researchers were hospitalized with COVID in 2019, and all roads lead to Fauci, who lied to Congress.
  • A study found that mRNA is used to instruct cells to produce the Spike protein of the alleged COVID virus, which has been found to be toxic and pathogenic.
  • To make it more stable, modRNA is utilized proving that these are not “vaccines” at all but are gene-based injections developed by the military and referred to as “countermeasures” and “prototypes” that force healthy cells to produce a viral protein. These labels were specifically used to avoid conventional regulatory testing. 
  • Spike Proteins then bind to ACE2 inducing an immune response and reprograming both adaptive and innate immune responses which has been linked to fibrinogen activation causing blood clots.
  • Page 7 states that graphene is required as it is needed as a base for the lipid nanoparticles to keep them stable.  These lipids carry manufacturer’s warnings stating they are never to be used in humans or animals.
  • Corrupt government and mainstream media have denied the presence of graphene in the shots for months despite it being discovered in 11/21 by Spanish researchers that found graphene makes up more than 99% of Pfizer’s injection. Other researchers have found this as well.
  • Leaked EMA docs confirm why the government made it illegal for scientists to analyze “vaccine” vials (they are considered government property): when they were finally analyzed, it was found that mRNA is not intact, there are vast quality control issues, contamination with DNA, and the vials are all different, because the current “vaccination” campaign is an ongoing clinical trial with different research arms with people getting different ingredients and varying dosages.
  • A British medical practitioner seized an injection vial from the refrigerator where she works and handed it to an independent investigator to determine if Noack and Campra‘s work was legitimate. The investigator, using Raman Spectroscopy, found that indeed the shots contain Graphene, SP3 carbon, iron oxide, carbon derivatives, and glass shards.
  • Two separate vial examinations found moving, “self aware” objects, graphene, numerous metals, and parasites.
  • A group of German scientists called The Working Group for COVID Vaccine Analysis found unusual toxic components in the COVID injections ‘without exception.’
  • Green monkey DNA (SV40) has been found in the shots, which has been linked to cancer.
  • Similarly to the aborted fetal cell issue in other vaccines, the wrong question has been being asked regarding the COVID injections. The question for both is: are fetal cells and is graphene used in the manufacturing processThe answer to both is a resounding YES, despite Pfizer’s attempted deception.
  • Graphene is known to be toxic to some cells and can cause inflammation and damage to the lungs when inhaled.  It also crosses the blood, brain, barrier – potentially leading to neurological problems. Graphene is identified as a pathogen by the immune system and once injected has an affinity for the CNS, potentially causing paralysis, strokes, and alternation of the nervous system.
  • Please read this excellent piece on the importance of graphene being pushed during COVID (injections, masks, tests all contain it), the internet of nanothings (5G), and chitosan (carbon-rich insect exoskeleton which enhances graphene in the body).
  • Besides Graphene, Spanish researchers have found nanotechnology in all the COVID shots.
    • To understand these connections, you must zoom out and understand how digitization is being used to control the public.
    • Then you must understand how the WEF and the WHO are consolidating global power by merging humanity with AI under the banner of “The Great Reset,” using “pandemics” and “Climate Change” to “hack human beings,” end free will, and to deploy mass surveillance, digitization, and automatization.
      • The WEF’s corrupt ESG score system (environment, social, and corporate governance) currently being used in corporations, but eventually to individuals, bypasses democracy, is a gigantic scam, and will create a new food system, a transition to “green” energy, a centralized power-base, travel restrictions, and smart cities.
      • Our government has partnered with private companies and has created technology that allows for biological processes to be controlled remotely, potentially manipulating our biological responses.
      • Patent (WO 2020/060606 – or 666) for a “Cryptocurrency System Using Body Activity Data” was filed in 2019 by researchers after Bill Gates approached Microsoft employees about solving the problem of identifying those who have not been “vaccinated.” The system senses body activity of the user and will be used to keep track of ESG-type scores and possibly reward or punish users.
      • Coronavirus and related vaccines were patented in 2018 and 2019 by Gates-funded Pirbright Institute, before the ‘pandemic’ occurred. The US and European patents are good until 2035. Pirbright and its investor firms have exclusive profiteering rights off the virus for the next 15 years. Four Big Pharma companies account for 85% of the total “vaccine” market: Sanofi, Merck and Pfizer, and GSK. The money trail tells you everything.
      • Lastly, there appears to be a genetic component in determining a role in a person’s susceptibility & developing severe symptoms with COVID. A reasonable sequitur would be: since the injections use the same spike protein as COVID, the injections could also be potentially racially targeting.
  • Dr Daniel Nagase, using an electron microscope, found that the contents of the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines” show no signs of biological material, including mRNA or DNA (Read more here) but rather carbon-oxygen structures taking nanosphere, crystalline, chips, strands, bulbs, spheres, fibers, and balls with legs growing out of them – polymorphic forms.
  • Argentine doctor Martín Monteverde presented the analyses carried out by Corona2Inspect researchers on the microtechnology found in the Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, which also found graphene.
  • Scientists in New Zealand using specialized microscopic techniques confirm that nanotechnology and graphene are in Pfizer’s Comirnaty shot and that none of the contaminants are listed as approved ingredients.
  • Paardekooper states“about 1 in 200 of the batches are highly toxic.” VAERS data shows “vaccine” batches are sequentially marked by varying toxicity which has been statistically graphed and proves manufacturers purpose and intent to maim people. The toxic batches were sent to Red states.
  • Regarding “vaccinated” patient blood:
    • Dr Philippe van Welbergen, Medical Director of Biomedical Clinics, was one of the first to warn of damage caused by looking at blood samples under the microscope. He found graphene is organizing and growing into larger fibers and structures, gaining magnetic properties or an electrical charge and the fibers are showing indications of more complex structures with striations.
    • Dr Philippe started taking blood samples due to patients complaining about chronic fatigue, dizziness, memory loss, paralysis, and heavy menstruation.  Prior to this he had never seen these unusual tube-like structures, particles which lit up, and many damaged cells. He showed that “shards” of Graphene are being transmitted from the “vaccinated” to the unvaccinated – destroying their red blood cells and causing blood clots. (Read more here).
    • Dr. Charles Hoffe, a medical practitioner in British Columbia, after observing that his COVID “vaccinated” patients complained of breathlessness, started testing these patients with D-dimer tests which showed at least 62% had microscopic blood clots causing their capillaries to plug up, potentially leading to serious cardiovascular events.
    • Embalmers are also finding arteries filled with clots in the COVID “vaccinated.”

Bad Op-Ed Criticizes Cochrane Mask Review: A New Low For Evidence Based Medicine

**Comment**

This website has posted prolifically on how science has been hijacked by the highest bidder.  This is imperative to know as public health makes decisions based upon politics, not science.  Science can no longer be trusted at face value and the public needs to dig into topics to understand the money/conflict trail.  In the case of masks, it’s perfectly clear: public health needed people to have unprecedented fear so they would isolate, deny natural immunity, and agree to get an experimental, fast-tracked, gene-therapy injection that public health agencies own patents on and have and will continue to use to control society at virtually every level.  It’s shockingly unbelievable, but true.  Public health no longer cares about public health and will defy all common sense and logic to further its own twisted agenda.  Many Lyme/MSIDS patients understand and believe this regarding Lymeland, but refuse for some reason to see it for other issues that are just as corrupted and convoluted.  The entire paradigm is flawed and needs an overhaul, but not in the way CDC Director Rochelle Walensky wants.  Giving the CDC and corrupt government agencies more money is the height of insanity and will only yield what it has always yielded: nothing but pain for patients and money for the government.

http://

Bad Op-Ed Criticizes Cochrane Mask Review

A New Low for Evidence Based Medicine

Vinay Prasad, MD MPH; Physician & Professor Hematologist/ Oncologist Professor of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medicine Author of 450+ Peer Reviewed papers, 2 Books, 2 Podcasts, 100+ op-eds.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola

3/32/23

Source

  • A 2023 study published in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews found wearing masks “makes little or no difference” in COVID-19 transmission
  • The New York Times got involved and columnist Zeynep Tufekci published an opinion piece titled, “Here’s Why the Science Is Clear That Masks Work,” in rebuttal — and reached out to Cochrane
  • Cochrane’s editor in chief released a statement about the study, stating the implication “masks don’t work” is an “inaccurate and misleading interpretation,” and they were calling on the authors to change the study’s summary and abstract
  • The study’s authors were blindsided by the statement, and the lead author reiterated, “There is just no evidence that they [masks] make any difference. Full stop”
  • In 2006, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation gave a $1.15-million grant to Cochrane, which subsequently published controversial and heavily criticized research in favor of HPV vaccines, which Gates has widely supported  

(See Source link for article)

Important excerpts:

Demasi spoke with lead author Jefferson about the unexpected statement. “It was upsetting,” Jefferson said. “Cochrane has thrown its own researchers under the bus again. The apology issued by Cochrane is from Soares-Weiser, not from the authors of the review.

Noting that there wasn’t much change in the findings from the 2020 review to 2023, Jefferson said the study was ready to be released in early 2020, as the pandemic was starting, “but Cochrane held it up for seven months before it was finally published in November 2020. Those seven months were crucial. During that time, it was when policy about masks was being formed. Our review was important, and it should have been out there.”

He believes that Cochrane intentionally delayed publication of the mask study until it could massage the results to fit with the narrative that masks work: “For some unknown reason, Cochrane decided it needed an ‘extra’ peer-review. And then they forced us to insert unnecessary text phrases in the review like ‘this review doesn’t contain any covid-19 trials,’ when it was obvious to anyone reading the study that the cut-off date was January 2020. … During those 7 months, other researchers at Cochrane produced some unacceptable pieces of work, using unacceptable studies, that gave the ‘right answer.'”

This time around, Jefferson and colleagues don’t intend to let Cochrane bully them into changing their study results to appease the media.

Welcome to the new normal where researchers are “disappeared” for not following dogma.

This issue is imperative to understand because similar deceit has been happening in Lyme-land for over 40 yearsCOVID has given the world a front-row seat to the shenanigans that Lyme/MSIDS patients continue to have to deal with.

_________________

For more:

Lyme Carditis Podcast: Dr. Adrian Baranchuk

https://www.globallymealliance.org/blog/interview-with-leading-expert-on-lyme-carditis-dr.-adrian-baranchuk

Listen Here:

Read the transcript below

In this interview you’ll learn more about a complication of Lyme disease known as Lyme carditis.

Interview condensed for clarity and length

My name is Lindsy Swift, Director of Marketing and Communications at Global Lyme Alliance. And I am pleased to be speaking with Dr. Baranchuk today on a very important topic that needs more education and awareness. Welcome, Dr. Baranchuk.

Dr. Baranchuk is one of the world’s leading experts on Lyme carditis. He is a Professor of Medicine at Queen’s University in the Division of Cardiology in Ontario, Canada. Dr. Baranchuk is also editor-in-chief of the Journal of Electro Cardiology, International Society of Holter and Non-invasive Electrocardiology, and President-Elect of the Interamerican Society of Cardiology. Dr. Baranchuk has published more than 750 articles in well-recognized international journals, 67 book chapters, and has presented more than 260 abstracts around the world. So for the purpose of this interview today, Dr. Baranchuk, let’s start off with a review of Lyme carditis. An easy question:

What is Lyme Carditis?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Thank you very much, Ms. Swift. As I said, it’s a pleasure to have the opportunity to chat about Lyme carditis with you today. So basically, most of our audience is familiarized with Lyme disease. So you got a tick bite, all of the sudden there is the dermatological manifestation. Sometimes it is the classic, we call it erythema migrans, which is that target lesion. But we know now that dermatological manifestation can vary and be something less common. And then the patient usually develops fever and what we call constitutional symptoms, which are those specific symptoms of not feeling well, feeling extremely weak, sometimes joint pain. And then this is what motivates going to the consult.

And when the skin manifestation is very obvious, then Lyme disease is first on the list. Or if these things happen in regions where doctors are aware that Lyme disease is very prevalent, we call it endemic regions, right? For example, my city, Kingston in Ontario, Canada, it’s a well-known zone for Lyme disease. So when patients come with these vague symptoms, somebody will suspect and send a serology to do the diagnosis. But your question specifically is how do we go from this skin manifestation to a heart lesion that we call Lyme carditis?

Well, it happens that the bacteria through the skin can enter the bloodstream, and then it’s distributed to many different parts in the body. And depending where the bacteria lands is where you are going to have your more classic manifestations. If it goes to the joints, is when you are going to have early disseminated Lyme arthritis. If it goes to your brain, you will have the early disseminated  neuroborreliosis. I know it’s a tough name, but when the bacteria lands in your brain, sometimes what it happens is that it lands in your heart.

1-s2.0-S0735109718394427-fx1

And then we call it Lyme carditis. Lyme carditis, as you said, occurs when the Lyme bacteria, the so-called Borrelia, affects your heart tissue. And for some reason, this bacteria has a special appetite for the electricity of your heart. It lands nine over ten times over your conduction system, which helps the heart contracting. And what it does is that it can slow down those contractions sometimes to the point that the heart stop beating. And if you are not resuscitated, this could be fatal. The other 10% of the time, it affects the muscle and the tissue that covers the heart. And we call that myopericarditis.

“…we should do ECGs to every single individual where you suspect or confirm Lyme disease…”

So, how often this happens, if you go to the literature, and I want your audience to pay attention to because this is something that is coming out in our research for the next two years. If you go to the literature, you will find that the heart is involved in Lyme disease 4 to 10% of the time. But Lindsy, this happens when the patient has symptoms.

So, during the description to the doctors, they say, and in addition of fever, this rash, my pain in the joints, I almost lost consciousness two times. Or I’m having chest pain or I’m having shortness of breath. And all of the sudden the doctor of decides to put one ECG and auscultation of your heart in the combo of your care for Lyme disease. And this is how we arrive to four to 10%, meaning this is not the real number. For the real number, we should do ECGs to every single individual where you suspect or confirm Lyme disease and put your stethoscope that machine we use to listen to your heart, in every single patient that you suspect or confirm Lyme disease. And my perception is that number could go much higher than 10%.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

But you will say why? How do you know Adrian, that that is possible?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Two reasons. One reason is that we have seen cases where patients are completely asymptomatic, they don’t feel anything on their heart, but the doctor was wise enough to include one ECG and we see manifestations of Lyme carditis there.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

And the second is that the group in Philadelphia basically looking at young kids with Lyme disease, they decided to do this systematic search. And you know what, Lindsy? The prevalence of heart complications increased to 27%.

Lindsy Swift:

That’s scary.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

So, what we want is to run studies on every single current study that is being done in the world about Lyme disease to include two simple cheap things. A $1 ECG, and a half of a dollar auscultation of the heart. And you may say, well, interim, but if they are diagnosed with Lyme disease, they are going to be treated so that may treat all Lyme disease and the heart, true. However, the type of antibiotic that you use, the administration way for the antibiotic to reach the patient, and the duration of the antibiotic treatment differs if you only have Lyme disease or if you have a Lyme carditis.

Lindsy Swift:

Right. So, this should be something that doctors should be doing when they suspect Lyme disease every time, is what you’re saying?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Every time. But for me, Lindsy, to say it with the same degree of confidence that you have said that, and I know I’m going to remove my clinical hat to put on my research hat, is I need research to prove that your observation, my observation, and the observation of plenty of clinicians and investigators around the world is true so we can systematically include the 12-lead ECG, I insist. Five minutes to obtain, $1, highly reproducible, easy to be transmitted by phone. So I can’t foresee family doctors working in remote areas where Lyme disease could be prevalent doing an ECG in their office and transmitted this ECG to a colleague of their confidence saying, I just got this ECG. Can you confirm if it’s normal or not? Because if it is abnormal, the patient may need to be transferred from where the patient is located to a center that can do cardiac monitoring.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

So, I would love to demonstrate this. When you interview me in, let’s say 2025, again, I can tell you, do you remember that conversation, Lindsy? We were right.

Lindsy Swift:

Right.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Because now we increase the prevalence of Lyme carditis from 10% to, I don’t know, 22, 25%.

Lindsy Swift:

Are there any plans in your research or anyone you know that’s doing this research out there that’s going to start doing this so that we have those numbers?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

So first, my recognition to Dr. Beech, she was one if, I can’t recall if it was the lead author, but she’s one of the authors down in, I say down because I am in Canada, a little bit higher than that. By the way, let me brag a little bit because a book is coming called Lyme Carditis from A to Z, and it’s going to be printed by Springer, we hope, mid-2023.

Lindsy Swift:

Oh, great.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

And this group has written the chapter on Lyme carditis in kids and young teenagers. A fantastic group, they work very hard and they were leading this idea. So, now we have conversations with different groups that have ongoing research to see if we can do a sub study. But at the same time, we are designing an observational project that could insert ECG as part of the mandatory test to do in every person diagnosed or highly suspected.

Remember that in some parts of the world, like in Canada, when we suspect Lyme disease, the serology takes five to seven days to return. So, if I truly suspect Lyme disease and there is an ECG with an abnormality, rather than sending the patient home on antibiotics for mouth, these patients should be admitted for IV antibiotics. And the question should be why? Because we have demonstrated more than five years ago that the progression of Lyme carditis can take from minutes to hours to days. So if I see a minor affection of the conduction system, this can be transformed into an emergency in a matter of hours. So if I’ve been lucky enough to have a minor thing, it corresponds to admit the patient, monitor the heart and start IV antibiotics until we receive the results of this serology.

…But we do know, and we have published, that unrecognized Lyme carditis can lead to death. And that can happen in a matter of minutes, hours or days. But please, to all the healthcare providers, if you are suspecting or diagnosing Lyme disease, make your effort to rule out whether the heart is being involved or not.

Does diagnosing Lyme in Lyme carditis differ in pediatric versus adult patients?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

This is an excellent question. So, the older the patient, you may have conditions that produce some heart impact that are independent on whether you have Lyme disease or not. And I do receive, and I see patients from all around the world that they come to Kingston for a 30-minute interview. For me to say, it is impossible to determine today if the symptoms that you have have anything to do with your Lyme disease that you suffered three years ago or not. And I’m very sad because if you are 65, 70, 75, having cardiovascular symptoms is extremely common. It’s more common than COVID, right? Cardiovascular diseases are the main cause of symptoms in patients older than 65 years of age. So, in order for me to connect that to Lyme, sometimes it’s difficult.

It’s easier when I receive emails from centers saying a patient has come with this ECG and this and this and this symptom. Do you think that the patient could have Lyme carditis? And for that, in 2018, so five years ago, we have published the SILC score. SILC, S-I-L-C, which stands for Suspected Index in Lyme Carditis, and it uses an acronym invented by one of my fellows at the time, Dr. Juan, that is called COSTAR. The COSTAR is constitutional symptoms, outdoor activities for the O. Sex, male seems to be more prevalent than female, something that needs further investigation, but so far is a three to one relationship.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Recognition of a tick bite, not every person recognizes that. But if I have symptoms and abnormal ECG and a guy that says, “Oh, three weeks ago I removed, I went for a hike and I removed a tick from my leg or from my groin.” Well, here it is. Age, so this is a disease that affects younger individuals, so age less than 50. And R for rash. If you tell me I do, I did have a rash, now it dissipated. When you have more than seven points to 12 for a total of 12, the possibility of that condition being Lyme carditis is so high that even without the serology, you should be admitted, take blood for serology, start the antibiotic. Three to six is intermediate, so we advocate for patients to be admitted anyway and telling them we’re going to treat you until we get the serology back.

Now, zero to two points is unlikely. So unlikely to be Lyme disease that if you even don’t want to ask for serology, you’re okay with that, just proceed and put a pacemaker on the patient. So I am super happy to tell you that since we published this in 2019, several groups from different parts of the world have been using it with a very high sensitivity. For your audience, that means that it’s very useful. So it helps a lot when you have an abnormal ECG and some of the symptoms that we’ve been describing for you to run the SILC score, use the COSTAR acronym, and if you have an intermediate to high mark, then to be admitted in hospital, don’t allow those patients to go home because then it happens the catastrophes that we’ve been discussing earlier.

Treatment for Lyme Carditis

Lindsy Swift: So you mentioned earlier that the treatment for it is IV antibiotics. Is that correct?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

That is correct. The proposed use of antibiotics is for 10 to 14 days of IV antibiotics depending on the response. It happened to us several cases that by day five, they recover conduction. If the patient require a temp perm, we remove it. By day seven, we put them on the treadmill. Treadmill, they exercise 150, 160 beats per minute. We send them home and we shift to doxycycline to complete a total of three weeks of antibiotic treatment.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

So the IV is until you recover the conduction. Then we switch to doxy at the time of the discharge, and the patient completes a total of three weeks. So let’s say that you’ve been one week on IV, you will take two more weeks. If you’ve been two weeks on IV, you will take only one week.

Lindsy Swift:

Okay. And is that that done in the hospital, or can it be in outpatient?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Well, if you are on IV antibiotics is because the suspicion of Lyme carditis is quite high and/or you have the confirmation already. So we propose that during the IV antibiotic with or without a temp perm because remember that there’s people that tolerates being at 40 beats per minute very well, and they don’t need the temp perm, but they need to be observed. Why? Because the progression from that to no cardiac beats can be very quick. Even if you’re treated on antibiotics, it happens that some patients may not respond to it. So while the patient is receiving IV antibiotics, we aim for the patients to be at the hospital. There are experiences in the US where the home care provided was excellent, and patients have received the IV antibiotic with a temp perm at home. And at the time of improvement, both things were removed, IV to PO complete three weeks, and removal of the device in the hospital. Here in Canada, we do not advocate to have patients with a temp perm connected to their heart at home. We prefer to keep an eye on them at all times.

Lindsy Swift:

Do you treat pediatric cases the same as adult cases? Is the treatment the same?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

You do. If the kid is able to tolerate a severe bradycardia, but he’s asymptomatic, IV antibiotics, monitoring.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

If the kid has collapsed, presented fainting, and a total interruption of their heart electricity, they get a temp perm (pacemaker).

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Because we don’t want that kid, maybe with a perm to be walking the corridor, we don’t want that. If I put a regular temporary pacemaker, the patient has to be in bed 24/7. So, this new strategy allows the person to walk while waiting to improve. So at the time of improvement, boom, home. I want to tell you very briefly an experience that we published very recently.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Two patients in different centers. They got Lyme carditis suspected, they got this serology, they started the IV antibiotics, but in the centers, they decided to implant a permanent pacemaker. So, the patients were contacted and say, your Lyme test came positive, please receive three weeks of antibiotic treatment. Both patients, one male, one female, have followed this indication. And for some reasons, they came to see me within one year of having that pacemaker implanted. So we did all the testing, demonstrated that they were not using their pacemakers because they received proper antibiotic treatment for myocarditis. We explained the risks associated with the extraction of the pacemaker. We proceeded to implant pacemakers. These were done in February and April 2022. After one year, they are doing their normal life with no pacemakers so.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

This is something to keep reflecting. We need more education within the healthcare system to avoid in the first case, to implant the pacemaker, the permanent pacemaker if it is not absolutely necessary.

Lindsy Swift:

Is there anything else that we didn’t go over that you feel like we need to discuss in regards to Lyme carditis?

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

No. Maybe saying that I do believe that research in the arena of determining how prevalent Lyme carditis is in patients with confirmed or highly suspected Lyme disease is still lacking. And the second thing is we need more educational platforms, books, webinars, conversations like this to help healthcare providers to have Lyme disease very high in their differential when patients come with conduction disorders at a young age. And for any patient that comes with conduction disorders living in an endemic region. So in regions where life, this is quite prevalent. So from that perspective, I only can thank you for the opportunity to keep spreading the voice along the world.

Lindsy Swift:

Well, thank you for your great work, and we’ll be sure to link your published articles and important articles that people should read in regards to Lyme carditis at the bottom of this interview. Thank you again for your time, and it was a great conversation.

Dr. Adrian Baranchuk:

Thank you so much, Ms. Swift, and I am at your disposal at any time.

For more:

#Placentagate, #Plasmidgate, & #Blotgate: The Ugly COVID Injection Triplets

https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/placentagate?

#Placentagate

Jikkyleaks drops a bombshell inside the blood brain barrier crater

Ignasz Semmelweisz

March 24, 2023

Recap – Bombshell number one

Remember when it was assumed that any vaccine injected into the deltoid muscle remained local to the injection site, was transported to the localised lymph nodes (typically armpit and neck region) and thereby resulted in an immune response developing? Remember when it was assumed by the manufacturers but not proven that unaspirated, “Safe and Effective” i.e. non-toxic Covid gene therapy doses injected into the deltoid acted in the same way?

Remember when Dr. Byram Bridle, Vaccinologist from University of Guelph, Canada, gave a primer on vaccination in the context of SARS-CoV-2 and laid out key, lay accessible knowledge and concerns in the field?  (See link for article)

Important excerpts:

Enter, stage right, Jikkyleaks, the most scientifically industrious white mouse known to mankind….

In short, Lipid NanoParticles have been seen to and designed to get to and through the placenta, into placental cells fundamental to pregnancy and foetal viability, implantation and development. Certain published claims that this has been done with “no toxicity” appear to be potentially false, with data proving the falsehood having been deliberately hidden or obfuscated within published research data using specific methods of data handling, classification and presentation. Some of this data from various research, including manufacturers, indicates that foetus loss increases – in one study doubling – in correlation with Covid vaccination i.e. there are major signals that LNPs cross the placenta, get into foetuses at all stages of development and can lead to foetal loss at various stages of pregnancy, despite Male et al claiming “no toxicity” and “no evidence of” toxicity. Some of the foetal losses occur so early that they are literally ignored and not counted as foetal losses in some of the research, which goes on to claim “no toxicity” by virtue of effectively having deliberately not looked for toxicity in certain foetuses….

Remember when governments and Pharma did all the necessary tests into the effects on human fertility of Covid gene therapies, BEFORE they were deployed in humans across the globe? No? That’s because they never did any human fertility testing.

(See link for article)

_______________

https://veryslowthinking.substack.com/p/mckernan-dna-contamination-in-covid

McKernan: DNA Contamination in Covid Shots #Plasmidgate

Kevin McKernan’s discovered genetic material contaminants and it’s off the charts

 
Important excerpts:

This article aims to provide:

  • a lay summary of the first (ongoing) research into the genetic content of Pfizer and Moderna Covid gene therapies….

The vectors contain mammalian promoters, bacterial origins of replication in addition to the neomycin and kanamycin resistance genes. Circular plasmids like this are used for stable transfection and continued expression of genes in mammalian cells with the strong SV40 promoter.

    1. The contaminant is therefore the plasmids, which have bacterial origins (their manufacture employed E. Coli), can replicate and interact in mammalian and bacterial cells, and are resistant to neomycin and kanamycin antibiotics (used in fighting gut infections).

A quick estimate… equates to 1 vector for every 3,000 mRNAs. The Pfizer vials have an order of magnitude higher rates of contamination. This is consistent with the fragment analysis having more off-target peaks.

    1. McKernan has found contaminants in Moderna and Pfizer monovalent and bivalent gene therapy samples.

    2. McKernan initially estimated the ratio of contamination to desired, specified mRNA active ingredient in the Moderna shot as 1 DNA molecule to 3000 RNA molecules, and flagged that the Pfizer samples are an order of magnitude beyond this contamination level (1:350).

This is unequivocal evidence that the contaminating vector sequence is double stranded DNA and not RNA.

    1. McKernan confirms that the genetic material contaminant is DNA, and therefore cannot be some form of corruption of the final active mRNA ingredient.

Important takeaway:

Alden et al “show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure,” which means that through LINE-1 Reverse Transcription, mRNA payload could integrate with human DNA in human liver cancer cells. That work was done in vitro, and did not directly mean that the result would certainly occur in vivo in normal human liver or other cells.

But McKernan’s finding of massive plasmid contamination (which exceeds EMA specifications by several orders of magnitude) leads him to suspect that LINE-1 RT may not be necessary for plasmid dsDNA to integrate with human host DNA.  Further, even if dsDNA RT and integration does not occur, McKernan flags concerns about potential endotoxin levels in the form of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which are the component of the outer membrane of gram-negative bacteria released into circulation upon distribution of the intact bacteria and which can cause septic reactions with symptoms like fever, hypotension, nausea, shivering and shock with serious complications such as disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), endotoxin shock and adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). 

An injectable healthcare product such as a vaccine or intravenous solution must be sterile or free of live bacteria, but the manufacturing process to kill any bacteria can result in release of LPS or endotoxin into the product. Just as with a bacterial infection or sepsis, if sufficient endotoxin gets into our blood stream or spinal fluid we can develop fever, shock, and organ failure. In extreme cases, it can even result in death.

Patients have no idea what they were injected with, what it will do to them over time, and why they were allowed to be placed in this horrible position.

______________

#BlotGate

Startling Evidence Suggests BioNTech & Pfizer Falsified Western Blots used to evaluate the protein expression of the mRNA in HEK cells which suggests a “smoking gun”.  Independent experts have also noted the duplication of the results to secure EUA status of the injections; however, mainstream media is asleep at the wheel and not reporting on this epic scandal known on social media as #Blotgate.

Interview

This evidence means, if proven, Pfizer’s indemnity status would no longer apply.

The scandal leaves many questions including:

  1. How did the “copy and paste” data sail through the radar of the regulators?

  2. How did the Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences publish the same fraudulent looking data presented in a Pfizer-funded paper, written by Pfizer and BioNTech’s employees (Patel et al.)?

  3. What proteins are being expressed in human cells from the vaccinal modified mRNA, other than the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein?

  4. Why has no genomic sequence of the expressed protein of the mRNA vaccine ever been published?

Trial Site News previously broke the scandal of the leaked European Medicines Agency emails and confidential Pfizer/BioNTech related documents, with an in-depth analysis and a follow up report which shows that key regulators were fully aware of the drop in RNA integrity to 55% in commercial batches compared to 78% in clinical batches. On top of this, alarming concern arose of the possibility of translate proteins other than the intended spike protein to occur.  Recently, French biostatistician Christine Cotton published a report on Pfizer’s trials where she found:

  • The FDA initially did not plan on showing Pfizer’s clinical trial data for 75 years until a judge ordered it be released within 8 months.  80,000 pages were released publicly in June, 2022 thanks to a FOIA lawsuit by 80 public health officers and researchers formed an alliance to get the data.
  • This is where Cotton comes in.  She found many biases in the documents including:
    • Pfizer’s 95% efficacy claim simply doesn’t hold true.
    • When the anti-nucleocapsid serology is taken into account, which determines who had COVID and who didn’t during the “vaccine” trials, efficacy falls from 95-55%.
    • Pfizer hid data on waning immunity for months, as millions queued to get the jab.  
  •  

Source

    • Pfizer data also shows that the clinical tests on monkeys showed efficacy would only last up to 3 months.
    • Pfizer chose not to even measure the length of efficacy after the second shot.
    • If antibodies had been measured after the 2nd dose, it would have been known as early as 12/2020 efficacy falls quickly and there wouldn’t have been a single agency that would have granted authorization for a product that is supposedly a “vaccine.”
    • A German newspaper reported on several deaths among trial participants that occurred shortly after the injection but were excluded from the trial data.
    • Cotton states that by not not choosing the right criteria and not taking the right measurements at the right time, as well as not reporting adverse effects, Pfizer was able to give their pre-determined outcome: the shots are safe and effective.
    • Pfizer engaged in data manipulation which is fraudulent.

A former employee of the Ventavia Research Group — which conducted some of the clinical trials for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine blew the whistle over a year ago over Pfizer’s falsifying trial data by unblinding patients, employing inadequately trained “vaccinators,” being slow to follow up on adverse events, and allowing workers to be overwhelmed by the volume of problems including mislabeled specimens – including blood specimens and nasal swabs.  Despite a federal judge in Texas dismissing the lawsuit the whistleblower promises an appeal and calls the ruling:

“…. a despicable & heinous betrayal of justice, a slap in the face to vaccine injured and whistleblowers, a blatant example of corruption, incompetence and cowardice, a declaration that the powerful are above the law.”  Brook Jackson

According to the whistleblower’s complaint, the three companies “deliberately withheld crucial information from the United States that calls the safety and efficacy of their vaccine into question,” and as a result, they defrauded the U.S. government which purchased the vaccines.

The $3 Trillion dollar false claims lawsuit drives home that Pfizer was contracted to deliver a safe and effective vaccine to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection. The injection delivers neither.

Pfizer cuts deals with the feds and has created shell companies to take the rap for their misdeeds, with a criminal plea that has allowed them to remain unscathed.  Further, internal company documents show that Pfizer uses a multimillion-dollar medical education budget to pay hundreds of doctors as speakers and consultants to serve as public relations spokespeople.

It’s important to note that a common tactic used by Big Pharma is to gaslight those injured by pharmaceuticals by using the plausibility sham of “evidence-based medicine,” and then insisting there is no data linking the injury to the drug or vaccine; however, these injuries are observed in clinical trials but are simply covered up to create the illusion it is“safe and effective.”

For more: