**Update March, 2023**

Senior Fellow of the Hoover Institution, and previous COVID adviser, Dr. Scott W. Atlas, was also featured in Newsweek, in the opinion section of course, where he details how America’s COVID response was based on lies.  Similarly to the video below that exposes 10 myths, Atlas has his own “10 biggest falsehoods” about COVID, known for years to be false:

  1. COVID has a far higher fatality rate than the flu.  FALSE
  2. Everyone is at significant risk to die from it.  FALSE
  3. No one has any immunological protection because it’s completely new.  FALSE
  4. Asymptomatic people are major drivers of the spread.  FALSE
  5. Locking down will stop or eliminate it.  FALSE
  6. Masks will protect and stop the spread.  FALSE
  7. The virus is natural, and claiming it’s from a lab is a conspiracy theory.  FALSE
  8. Teachers are at especially high risk.  FALSE
  9. COVID “vaccines” stop the spread.  FALSE
  10. Immune protection only comes from a “vaccine.”  FALSE

Although I posted on the Lancet’s review previously, the following articles are important because people are becoming emboldened to speak out on the absolute lunacy of the past three years which includes the denial of natural immunity (among MANY other issues still waiting in the sidelines to be rectified) by public health, mainstream medicine and media.  These same groups then censored, threatened, and maligned anyone who disagreed with their lunacy.  Jobs and reputations were forever lost due to unscientific edicts causing untold damage.

There appears to be a new trend in mainstream media that is allowing for a few orchestrated concessions in the COVID wars. The latest opinion piece highlighted below from the NY Post titled: “10 Myths Told by COVID Experts – and Now Debunked” is one such example; however, many still remain emotionally and powerfully entrenched in government issued directives that don’t work at all despite the admissions of fact.



Expert Testimony: “The Greatest Perpetrator of ‘Misinformation’ During the Pandemic Has Been the United States Government.”

The Hill

March, 2023

In short, the following myths have been debunked:  (please share this widely – the madness needs to end)

  1. Natural immunity offers little protection compared to vaccinesFALSE  (Most Americans who were fired for not getting the clot shot already had antibodies which the government refused to recognize.)
  2. Masks prevent COVID transmission.  FALSE (But CDC director Walensky downplayed the latest study because it focused on randomized controlled studies, which are normally considered the gold standard of evidence!)
  3. School closures reduce COVID transmission. FALSE (CDC ignored European experience which showed transmission rates were no different.)
  4. Myocarditis from the “vaccine” is less common than from the infection. FALSE (it’s actually 6-28 times more common after the injections and tens of thousands of kids likely got subclinical myocarditis)
  5. Young people benefit from a “vaccine” booster. FALSE (the FDA’s top two vaccine experts left the agency in protest because there is no data to support this at all)
  6. “Vaccine” mandates increased “vaccination” rates. FALSE (the Biden regime demanded that unvaxxed workers, soldiers, and health care workers be fired, discharged, and laid off regardless of their risk or natural immunity and despite the fact the shots do not reduce transmission or infection and actually set you up for illness).
  7. COVID originating from the Wuhan lab is a conspiracy theoryFALSE (overwhelming circumstantial evidence points to a lab leak, and patents prove shady deals).
  8. It’s important to get the 2nd COVID shot dose 3-4 weeks after the first dose.  FALSE  (data show that spacing the vaccine by 3 months reduces complication rates, but why get it at all since it’s ineffective and linked to adverse events and even death?)
  9. Data on the bivalent “vaccine” is ‘crystal clear.’  FALSE  (data that was used to approve it was based on EIGHT mice)  
  10. 1 in 5 people get long COVID.  FALSE (UK study found only 3% had residual symptoms lasting 12 weeks. Calling cases that experience mild fatigue or weakness for a few weeks after illness “long COVID” is the medicalization of ordinary life.)


Three Years Late, the Lancet Recognizes Natural Immunity

The public-health clerisy rediscovers a principle of immunology it derided throughout the pandemic.

The Lancet medical journal this month published a review of 65 studies that concluded prior infection with Covid—i.e., natural immunity—is at least as protective as two doses of mRNA vaccines. The most surprising news was that the study made the mainstream press.  (See link for article)

The article is behind a paywall, but Brencha Baletti, Ph.D. writes for The Defender and gives the following important quote by Finley:

“The Lancet study’s vindication of natural immunity fits a pandemic pattern: The public-health clerisy rejects an argument that ostensibly threatens its authority; eventually it’s forced to soften its position in the face of incontrovertible evidence; and yet not once does it acknowledge its opponents were right.”

Truer words were never spoken, and while some have been onto the scam from the get-go, many people are still confused or remain staunch in following futile public health dictates, which have caused more harm than good.  Further, corrupt public health has not come clean but has offered meaningless platitudes with no real change, and then has the gall to ask for more money and power, and double down on fruitless pandemic measures.

Again, for the hard of hearing: No Amnesty for Branch Covidians.

This denial and censorship of natural immunity has also caused untold damage, including pushing people to get dangerous and ineffective experimental gene therapy injections that have been linked to more reports of adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.  Sadly, the damage continues.

Which brings up another good point:


CDC Must Not Survive COVID-19

They have $10.1Bln Discretionary Funds and got everything – EVERYTHING – wrong. By my estimation, the health of all future generations is at stake. We cannot accept a stalemate.

Discretionary Budget Authority (CDC):  10.1 BILLION dollars

Discretionary Budget Authority (IPAK):  84 thousand dollars

CDC receives 14.1 million times more funding than IPAK. Think about that. Given the run I’ve given them in challenging them to embark on object research, I’d say that it’s fairly clear that we should invest heavily in independent research.

A Timeline of Highlights

When I started looking into vaccine safety studies in 2014 for a book on biomedical research, I was looking for success stories in translational research. When, at the last moment, I decided to add a chapter on vaccines, I thought it would be easy. So easy, in fact, I expected the vaccine chapter to be the easiest to write for the book.

Along the journey that followed, I appeared in the Netflix Documentary “Pandemic” – before the pandemic, was hunted by a group of amateurs affiliated with the BBC (leading to their taking down a Youtube video and performing correcting edits). I’ve been on national news stations, uncountable radio spots and podcasts, all with the same message: CDC has destroyed trust in public health by warping science to the point where it is unrecognizable as such to those who are trained to know the difference.

The CDC’s reliance on the myth of their reputation as a definitive authority for reliable information was a massive error: sooner or later, someone was bound to look and find facts that run counter to CDC’s blustery claims, such as

(a) not all vaccines had been tested for association with autism (my “Magic” presentation @ Life University, 2015)

(b) some studies did, in fact, find association with autism (my “Magic” Presentation @ Life University, 2015)

(c) true insert saline placebos were not used in most of the vaccine studies (ICANDecide.org)

We were on a serious roll. Then COVID-19 hit. Here’s a timeline with some of the key events and initiatives I’ve been involved in – not for boasting, but for resource use.

Time and time again, my analyses have caught CDC, FDA, Pfizer, Moderna, and others falling far short of basing their positions on their own data. From the actual initial efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines (75%, not 95%), to fudged report after report on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, I watched the march of efficacy decline until the evidence of negative efficacy was irrefutable.

Between my own analyses and the analyses of the hundreds of people who have contributed to the awareness stream, I am now at the point where I find the following assertations are well-founded, if not self-evident:

  1. Allopathic medicine is now under the total control of Public Health.
  2. There will be a ten-to-hundred-fold increase in the rate of chronic illness as a result of the COVID-19 vaccine program.
  3. The mRNA is taken up by our genomes.
  4. Epigenetic and genetic effects of the mRNA vaccine are a certainty.
  5. Increased cancer risk is a necessary result.
  6. The mRNA vaccines have altered the course of human evolution in a major way (selection against those who cannot tolerate mRNA vaccines).
  7. Many who are vaccinated may be permanently sterile.
  8. All physicians must nevertheless turn to the question: what is the best for my patient now?

(See link for article and evidence of building the next phase of whatever is to come)

For more on the corrupt CDC:

%d bloggers like this: