Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Another Shocking Lab Investigation of COVID “Vaccines. Doctors Told to “Zip It” Regarding Vax Injuries. Pentagon Officially Rescinds COVID Vax Requirement For the Military

https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/shocking-lab-investigation-of-covid-vaccines_4955787.html

Shocking Lab Investigation of COVID Vaccines

Joseph Mercola
Jan 1 2023
(Fit Ztudio/Shutterstock)
(Fit Ztudio/Shutterstock)

Finally, an unbiased pathologist has taken a vaccine into the lab to demonstrate exactly what’s causing ‘the mystery of the rubbery clots.’

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • A recent laboratory investigation by The Highwire reveals the only consistent thing about the COVID shots are their inconsistency. There is no quality control. Some appear clear like saline, while others are loaded with contaminants
  • In August 2021, Japan rejected 1.63 million doses of Moderna’s mRNA shot due to contamination. Last year the European Medicines Agency (EMA) also expressed concern over vials that were only 50% to 55% pure
  • The vials also contain massively inconsistent amounts of polyethylene glycol (PEG). PEG can cause anaphylactic shock in some people. PEG also gets in the way of proper immune response
  • If you are unfortunate enough to get a vial that is loaded with PEG, your risk of adverse effects such as anaphylactic shock and dysregulated immune response is greater than if you get a vial with lower amounts
  • According to Dr. Ryan Cole, a pathologist, what looks like microchips or nanotechnology in the liquid are actually stacked cholesterol, sugar and salt crystals, and what has been described as parasites are stellate trikons, found on the bottom of leaves. They’re likely a contaminant picked up at some point during the lab investigation

December 12, 2022, The Highwire posted1 a fascinating and shocking lab investigation of the COVID shots. Del Bigtree begins by reviewing some of the many alleged findings by organizations looking at the shots using various technologies. For example, some claim to have found graphite in the vials, while others have discovered what looks like nanotechnology and parasites.  (See link for video and article)

______________

There have been other labs looking into the vials and all are finding numerous contaminants.

Summary of video on COVID shot lab findings:

  • Some may be getting fragmented RNA as opposed to complete RNA, which can have unforeseen consequences.
  • Using mass spectronomy, metallic particles including aluminum, silicon, magnesium, sodium chloride, calcium, titanium, and iron were found.
  • While Cole admits no graphene was found in any of the 100 vials he tested; manufacturing processes result in wildly varying contents and it has been found by other researchers.  In fact, one group found around 747 nanograms of graphene oxide which means 99% of the tested Pfizer shot was made up entirely of graphene oxide, which one expert describes as nano-razors.
  • Two harmful things he did find was the lipid nanoparticle (hyper-inflammatory & toxic) and a gene sequence that forces your body make a foreign protein.
  • The injections were meant to be given once. Studies giving it more frequently have not been done so cumulative toxicity is unknown. (This is also true that the cumulative effect of ALL vaccines is unknown)
  • The more of this gene that gets into cells that continue to make a spike protein with known countless side-effects the worse the outcome.  Go here to see data on how the boosted are worse off than the unvaccinated, as well as a growing body of research that has detected negative vaccine effectiveness after a period of time and a higher likelihood of getting infected among people with more doses.
  • Cole took a drop of Bigtree’s unvaccinated blood and added a drop of the COVID injection.  In the area touched by the COVID shot, the red blood cells look like they’d evaporated.  The hemoglobin was wiped out causing the cells to turn white. The cells were also clumping toward the outside of the drop with many folding together with echinocytes clearly visible.

“It instantly changed the pH of the interior. These are little blobs of protein on the membrane of the red cell, because the red cell has involuted … All these little fingers, that is not spike protein. That’s another myth.

But that’s fascinating, because that instantly changed the pH of the interior of the cell. And it caused a massive outflow of fluid from the interior of the cell causing all that cell membrane folding. That’s wild.

It was almost instantaneous, and it is everywhere. Those red cells are now nonfunctional red cells. Those aren’t going to carry a whit of oxygen. Now your body has to decide what to do and has an inflammatory reaction, because now it has to gobble those up.”

Cole warns that ‘the powers that be’ want to try do do lipid nanoparticles with influenza, RSV, and other shots going forward when the current COVID injection program has failed and is harmful technology. Humans were not created to make foreign toxic proteins.

Cole states that not only do the COVID shots need to be stopped, but the entire platform as well.

The article ends by stating if you already got one of more shots, stop now and take no more.  He points you to the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance’s (FLCCC) post-jab injury protocol.

http://Approx. 4 min

Doctors Told to “Zip It” About ‘Vaccine’ Injuries

GB News

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/10/politics/military-covid-vaccine-rescinded/index.html

Pentagon officially rescinds Covid-19 vaccine requirement for troops

By Haley Britzky, CNN
January 11, 2023

A US Marine prepares to receive the Moderna coronavirus vaccine at Camp Hansen on April 28, 2021, in Kin, Japan.
A US Marine prepares to receive the Moderna coronavirus vaccine at Camp Hansen on April 28, 2021, in Kin, Japan.

Carl Court/Getty Images/FILE

CNN — 

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has officially rescinded the military’s Covid-19 vaccination mandate for troops after President Joe Biden signed the 2023 National Defense Authorization Act, requiring its dismissal.

“Section 525 of the NDAA for FY 2023 requires me to rescind the mandate that members of the armed forces be vaccinated against Covid-19, issued in my August 24, 2021 memorandum … I hereby rescind that memorandum,” Austin said in a memo on Tuesday night.

Excerpts:

According to Austin’s memo, no service members currently in uniform who were pending approval for a religious or medical exemption to getting the mandate will be separated from the military. Austin also directed the services to update individuals’ military records and remove “any adverse actions solely associated with denials of requests” from their files.

As for those who have already been removed from service for their refusal to get the vaccine, which fell under failing to obey a lawful order, Austin said in the memo that the DOD is “precluded by law from awarding any characterization less than a general (under honorable conditions) discharge.” General discharges are a step down from an honorable discharge, and are typically for troops that had satisfactory service but had minor misconduct.

Service members who received that discharge because of their refusal to get the vaccine can petition their individual branch for a correction of their records, Austin said.

________________

**Comment**

Unfortunately, this too is too little, too late.

Reports of injury and death in military members continue to roll out. For instance, this 22 year old soldier had to be hospitalized 9 times after the shot. This 21 year old Air Force Academy football player dies suddenly.  18 year old Marine recruit collapsed and dies during basic training.  Military whistleblowers (who have been fired on the spot for speaking out) have come forth showing that the DOD has edited the medical database to hide COVID shot injuries.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

COVID Gene Therapy Injections Developed by U.S. Military Are Called “Counter Measures” & Were Ordered As “Prototypes”

**UPDATE Aug., 2023**

“Fact-checkers” continue to deny that the clot shots are gene therapy which contradicts the FDA’s own definition as well as Moderna’s Securities and Exchange Commission filings.  Further, the shots fulfill none of the original definitions for a vaccine.  The definition of vaccine was changed to include the experimental COVID gene therapies and a FOIA shows that the reason for the change was simply to shut down arguments by “right-wing COVID-19 pandemic deniers” that “COVID-19 vaccines are not vaccines per CDC’s own definition.”

While the report below is imperative to understand, so is the information in this article which exposes the military think tank side of all of this. This one minute video by former Pharma research and development executive Sasha Latypova exposes how General Talley of the DOD and others repeat the phrase ‘whole of government’ ad nauseum in press conferences which refers to preemption of state authority and state court jurisdiction due to federal jurisdictional issues. HHS secretary Azar started incorporating it into PREP Act declarations, and seems to originate from the 2010 National Security Strategy document by Obama, cited in 2012-2016 MCMI strategic plan.

This plan particularly targets the “vaccinated” in a globe-spanning military operation by destroying human autonomy by centralizing power and using implanted technology (making humans bioreactors) to reduce the population, provide mass surveillance, and tyrannical control of people’s movements.  While Charles Lieber, who created the nanotechnology, was found guilty of lying about Chinese funding, his work continues through Jia Lui of Harvard who patented Lieber’s work  (nanoscale wires/electronics which can be embedded in biological structures such as tissues and organs to apply an electrical stimulus to the biological structure).  

http://  (Approx. 1 Hour 50 Min.  Scroll to 39:00 to hear Latypova)

Report Shows DOD Controlled COVID Program from the Beginning

Jan. 5, 2022

Redacted

BOMBSHELL new report shows that the Department of Defense controlled the COVID-19 Program from the very beginning… and everything we were told was political theater to cover it up. These documents were obtained by a former executive of a pharmaceutical Contract Research Organization Sasha Latypova.  Excerpt:

Pfizer-BioNTech is really a 3-party R&D alliance: Fosun-Pfizer-BioNTech, and by “party” I mean that one of the three is the Chinese Communist Party. Fosun is a huge Chinese conglomerate that owns a large number of global companies, and its chairman Guo Guangchang is a very high ranking member of the CCP. It is curious that the US DoD awarded $10 billion (Pfizer’s Operation Warp Speed/DoD/BARDA contract) to a venture whose substantial equity (and IP) holder is the the Chinese Communist Party. 

Latypova explains that within the documents, the injections are called “Counter Measures,” which the DOD ordered as “prototypes,” from private manufacturers.

For anyone paying attention, Dr. David Martin explained early on that these are not “vaccines,” but rather gene therapy injections – which allows manufacturers to by-pass normal safety testing commonly used with vaccines. Go here for an important article on how and why the Associated Press is lying about this fact.

Latypova also has written this article on the variability of the shots as well as the fact they are highly unstable, degrade rapidly, and will not distribute evenly as they are manually made water-fat mixtures with fat tending to float to the top, especially after several hours. Some doses will contain 50%+ more mRNA which would introduce 5-6 trillion extra mRNA molecules in the injection which will distribute all over the body in minutes, rapidly make toxic spikes, and may kill a person quickly.  One ex-pharmaceutical exec calls the injections “garbage soup.”

None of this was tested by any regulator as no acceptance criteria for vials/doses exists.

The video wraps up at about 54:10 where Morris states COVID was planned in 2013 and then questions the future.  From the documents, both Morris and Latypova agree that ‘the powers that be’ are already planning the next pandemic with the next thing on the list being to give up our sovereignty under the WHO under international health regulations so the WHO can declare a ‘pandemic’ anytime they want to, which is exactly what they’ve done numerous times before and most recently with COVID when there were only 40 cases worldwide.  This move would allow the WHO to become a global health dictatorship superseding the US Constitution, rendering individual rights null and void. Many state that despite experts defying the narrative, they could even declare a “climate change” pandemic to lock us down.

Go here for another interview of Latypova with Christine Dolan (host) and Katherine Watt (US paralegal) as they expose how the PREP Act and Countermeasures programs were used to completely bypass Constitutional Law and implement terror on the American public.

For a clear picture of the monopolization within health in action, learn how The Cares Act  holds hospitals hostage by bribing them with bonus incentive payments, medically kidnapping patients making them virtual prisoners.  Many have had to resort to the courts to get their loved one life saving treatment, which is currently banned for use by ‘the powers that be.’

The monopolization of mainstream & social media, Big Tech, asset management firms, research, public health, and mainstream medicine must be stopped or doctors & patients will have no voice and no choice.

Monopolization is the endgame.  For those of you who believe the government is the best entity to rule/decide everything, I ask you to reflect upon the rife conflicts of interest and how it has treated Lyme/MSIDS (and many other issues) for over 40 years. Then there’s the most current example of COVID, which has been handled abysmally, which one doctor states is “completely stupid” and “unethical,” and chronicles here.  A similar chronology states many of the same things.  Even CDC director Walensky freely admits the CDC bungled the affair, but she offers no meaningful change, and even has the audacity to ask for more funding.  Please do not bury your head in the sand.  Wake up and smell the coffee before it’s too late.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2023/the-covid-19-vaccines-are-weapons-developed-by-the-u-s-military/

The COVID-19 “Vaccines” Are Weapons Developed by the U.S. Military

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

With more of the American public waking up to the fact that the COVID-19 shots are linked to the epidemic of “sudden deaths,” these rushed-to-market emergency use authorized (EUA) “vaccines” are gaining more scrutiny by many in the Alternative Media, and there is now ample evidence that the U.S. Department of Defense has been behind the funding and development of these shots from the beginning.

First referred to as the “War Against the Virus” by President Donald Trump in 2020, it is obvious now that this was a planned military operation all along, and the military operation that released federal funding to fast-track these weapons of mass destruction that are called “vaccines,” was also given a military name: Operation Warp Speed.

The U.S. Military program is a huge black hole that swallows $TRILLIONS each year, and we don’t even know where half of that money goes, because the Pentagon has failed all of its audits for the past 5 years, and in 2022 it could not account for over half of its assets. (Source.)

They don’t even pretend to be fixing this problem anytime soon, because they have publicly stated that they “hope” to be able to pass their first audit by 2027. (Source.)

After two years of funding military spending on COVID “Counter Measures” to fight the “unseen” enemy of “COVID,” much of that funding switched over to Ukraine at the beginning of 2022.

The Brownstone Institute has just published a nice summary of the evidence that none of the EUA shots would have been possible without the U.S. Military, and that most of this has been hidden from the public.

I appreciate that The Brownstone Institute offers the Creative Commons license to allow others to copy and republish their work, as does Health Impact News.

This allows for the greatest distribution of information that is vital to the public, even though other publishers routinely use our articles and graphics without properly attributing it, as is required by the Creative Commons license.

More and more of the content published by the Alternative Media is moving to Substack.com, where the author can put up a paywall to access it.

As I have previously written, many of the same capital venture companies that fund Substack.com also fund other social media companies, like Twitter. See:  Protecting Your Privacy Should be a High Priority in 2023 – Beware of Substack!

And while I do make contributions to the independent publishers who request donations if I use their material, I will not give my credit card and personal data to Substack.com. In 2020 the platform “accidentally” revealed thousands of emails of their subscribers. (Source.)

I don’t know where Brownstone’s funding comes from, but at least you can read their articles for free without them collecting any personal information about you. The founder, Jeffrey A. Tucker, is also a Senior Economics Columnist for Epoch Times. (Source.)

The Epoch Times does require a paywall for most of their articles, even though they appear to be well-funded by Chinese dissidents from the Falun Gong Christian sect, according to Wikipedia.

Did National Security Imperatives Compromise COVID-19 Vaccine Safety?

by Phillip M. Altman
The Brownstone Institute

In addition to Phillip M. Altman BPharm(Hons) MSc PhD, coauthors on this piece include James Rowe BPharm, MSc, PhD FRSN, Wendy Hoy AO FAA FRACP, Gerry Brady  MBBS, Astrid Lefringhausen, PhD, Robyn Cosford MBBS(Hons) FACNEM FASLM, and Bruce Wauchope MBBS – DTM&H, Dip OBS RACOG, FRACGP.

The US Department of Defense (US DoD) has had a dominant role in the response to the SARS-CoV-2 virus and in the development, and distribution of the Covid 19 vaccines, a fact hidden from the general public. In those processes many standard steps and procedures, otherwise required for pharmaceutical products, were omitted or circumvented.

Definition of these vaccines as “countermeasures” rather than therapeutic agents has permitted their expedited progression to emergency use authorisation and widespread rollouts. Many adverse consequences have been the outcome of this secret military response to a public health matter. Why are governments around the world, including Australia, planning to make further significant investments in this rushed vaccine technology driven by the US military?

Operation Warp Speed

With the US Food and Drug Administration’s Emergency Use Authorisation of the COVID-19 vaccines (FDA, 2020) and the Provisional Approval of the first COVID-19 vaccine in Australia (TGA, 2021), these agents were hailed as innovative life-saving responses by the pharmaceutical industry to a deadly global pandemic.

The development, testing and drug regulatory approval of these novel COVID-19 gene-based vaccines using messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) technology was said to have been done in less than one year, whereas development and approval of conventional vaccines normally takes about 10 years. (Seneff and Nigh, 2021). The public was told that this was assisted by financial support of vaccine companies by the US government under Operation Warp Speed.

The public was told that these COVID-19 gene-based vaccines were “safe and effective” (CDCa, 2022): that they would prevent infection and chances of serious illness and death from the virus, and would prevent transmission of the virus. We now know they do not prevent infection nor transmission and have not prevented a continuing high incidence of COVID-19. Furthermore they are associated with an unprecedented incidence of serious adverse events and deaths compared to any other drugs in the history of the pharmaceutical industry. (Turni and Lefringhausen 2022; Altman, 2022; CMN, 2022; Blaylock, 2022).

Based on the US CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), there were 1,476,227 adverse event reports associated with these “vaccines” (CDCb, 2022).  through December 2, 2022, which include 32,621 reported deaths and 185,412 hospitalizations. Furthermore, a rise in unexplained deaths has been reported around the world coincident with their introduction. In Australia, up to August 2022 there were 18,671 excess deaths (17 percent) more than average, with most of these deaths not due to COVID-19 (ABS, 2022).  We are probably facing the worst health disaster in history.

How did the pharmaceutical industry, our governments and our drug regulators get it so wrong?  A plausible answer to this question has emerged within the last few weeks.

A National Security Operation

Contrary to popular belief that pharmaceutical companies drove the COVID vaccine development programs, the US FDA’s website (FDA, 2020) reveals that the United States Department of Defence (DoD) has been in full control of the Covid Vaccine development program since its beginning. The DoD has been responsible for development, manufacturing, clinical trials, quality assurance, distribution and administration, since that time (FDA, 2020; Rees and Latypova, 2022; KEI, 2022; Medical Defense Consortium, 2022; Rees, 2022). The major pharmaceutical companies have been involved as “Project Coordination Teams” effectively performing as subcontractors to the DoD. The Chief Operating Officer for the Warp Speed vaccine program is the US Department of Defence, and the Chief Science Advisor is the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

The Nature of Gene-based Vaccines

The true nature of the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ has been largely misrepresented by mainstream media, big pharmaceutical companies and governments and is poorly understood by the population at large.  Referring to these products as “vaccines” led most people to consider them as relatively safe and well-researched and readily accept their widespread use. However, they are not really vaccines – they are serious gene-based interventions which have never been deployed widely in any population, especially never to healthy individuals including children, infants and pregnant women.  In this sense they should be considered experimental.

COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ fall into a special class of therapeutic agents under the US FDA Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies’ defined as “gene therapy products,” which involve “introducing a new or modified gene into the body to help treat a disease” (FDA, 2018). Heretofore, use of gene therapy products has been limited to the treatment of usually rare, serious and debilitating disease or genetic conditions. They have potential to cause permanent intergenerational genetic damage, cancer and interfere with reproductive capacity.

The FDA and other drug regulatory agencies have specific rules and guidelines to direct manufacturers in development and testing of such products, for both preclinical (FDA, 2013) and clinical (FDA, 2015) research.  However, the FDA did not evaluate these COVID-19 “vaccines” according to these gene therapy guidelines.

Instead, there was a concerted effort to avoid referring to them as gene therapy products, based, in part, on the argument that the genetic material in the COVID-19 vaccines was not intended to be incorporated into an individual’s DNA, nor to modify gene expression. There was no prior short-term safety information and no long-term data on which to predict future effects. No similar therapeutic products have been previously approved anywhere in the world.  Their widespread administration globally with no historical safety experience was an unprecedented risk in human health.

Accelerating Development

Messenger RNA platform technology has been researched by DARPA (Defense Advanced Projects Research Agency) since at least 2012 (McCullough, 2022).  In early 2020, in the panic to develop the COVID-19 vaccines, certain critical research and development procedures were omitted, bypassed, curtailed, or not done in a logical sequential manner, or to established laboratory or manufacturing standards. Although the spike protein is the active drug and is directly responsible for the immune response, its pharmacology and toxicology have not been studied in animals or in humans as would normally have been required.

Other notable deficiencies include lack of critical research on carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, genotoxicity and reproductive toxicology in appropriate animal species. In particular, the potential for reverse transcription of mRNA genetic material into an individual’s DNA was not investigated. Furthermore, scale-up manufacturing was premature and lacked adequate quality control to ensure that product made in large batches is the same as made in smaller batches.

Without such research, the potency, mRNA integrity, presence of contaminants and stability of the “vaccines” cannot be guaranteed. Such oversights are directly responsible for the failure to predict the serious adverse drug reactions and mortality which have now been reported in association with these vaccines. 

To mitigate risk, the plan in vaccine development was to use multiple technologies, multiple facilities and redundancy. Leverage of existing facilities would also take place. In the interest of expediency, the plan was to avoid using traditional pathways from early development to large-scale production.  Avoidance of quality standards and guidelines such as Good Manufacturing Practice and Good Laboratory Practice guidelines was necessary to speed development, and conventional New Drug Application (NDA) and Biologics License Application (BLA) approvals were bypassed.

Instead, the process moved rapidly using compressed timelines and overlapping stages of development towards Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). Scale-up and large volume manufacturing was planned in parallel with, instead of before, clinical trials which, again, may have contravened accepted codes of Good Manufacturing Practices. These approaches were probably a recipe for potential disaster. (Latypova, 2022; Watt and Latypova, 2022).

Key legislative elements enable the US government to authorise, fund, contract and control many DoD research programs, as follows:

  • the Emergency Use Authorisation regulations (1997) allow, in cases of emergency, a new drug to be made available with less supportive safety and efficacy data than normally required for full approval.
  • the Other Transaction Authority regulations (2015) permit contractual transactions that are not required to comply with Federal laws and regulations, and
  • the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act (PREP Act 2020) establishes limited liability for the companies involved in the contract arrangements with the DoD.

Two US DoD agencies, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA), possess considerable resources for research, development and approval for various products. They also contract with a large number of companies for such functions.

The products of these programs, including the COVID-19 vaccines, are sometimes classified as “countermeasures,” “prototypes,” or “demonstrations” rather than pharmaceutical products. Those labels permit a product to avoid lengthy conventional regulatory, commercial development and testing pathways normally required for pharmaceutical products (ICH, 2022) and to proceed to Emergency Use Authorization.

The Rush to Large-Scale Manufacture

The rush to make available the Covid vaccines has reportedly led to batch-to-batch variability, with some batches associated with a high incidence of adverse vaccine reactions and mortality (Gutschi, 2022). In addition, at least 26 researchers/research teams in 16 countries, using various microscopic methods of analysis, have reported the presence of undeclared microscopic geometric and tube-like structures in both the Covid vaccine vials, and in the blood of people in widely vaccinated populations, for which there is no satisfactory explanation at this time. Furthermore, various spectroscopic methods of analysis have detected the presence of undeclared and unexpected metals (German Working Group, 2022; Hughes, 2022).

Under normal circumstances, even a tiny fraction of the reported quality, efficacy or safety problems associated with the Covid vaccines would have led to their immediate withdrawal, but this has not happened. Pharmaceutical regulators globally seem to be willfully blind to the problems. Governments and the mainstream media appear to show no interest in uncovering the truth or conducting a public debate on these critical matters. Why?

The answer appears to be that, in the interest of national security, the US DoD took charge of the Covid vaccine funding, development and testing from the very start of the perceived threat in early 2020. In the early panic, normal prudent quality, safety and efficacy considerations were compromised. Drug regulators played, and continue to play, an acquiescent role in approving and endorsing these vaccines. We now see this was a mistake. Many are now of the opinion that the Covid vaccines appear to have done more harm than good (Dopp and Seneff, 2022). Uncovering the truth has been a slow and arduous process, which has been exacerbated by the intense and unprecedented censorship of doctors and scientists, which continues to this day.

Conclusion

Many questions have arisen about the COVID vaccines concerning the lack of adequate manufacturing practices, quality control, basic pharmacological and toxicological studies and the lack of appropriate clinical safety and efficacy studies. Drug regulatory authorities seem reluctant to acknowledge the unprecedented level of reported serious adverse drug reactions and deaths associated with these products. There is also serious concern regarding the increases in excess deaths from all causes in many countries suspiciously with their use. Our health authorities steadfastly refuse to consider that the vaccines themselves may be to blame.

The public was told these COVID vaccines were “safe and effective” without qualification even though they were not fully approved. Why was the public not advised that the normal standards of quality, safety and efficacy were not applied to the development and testing of these vaccines? Why was this kept secret? Why are governments around the world, including Australia, planning to make further significant investments in this unsafe vaccine technology? Will these national security arrangements still be in place for future vaccines and other pharmaceutical products?

The fate of humanity and all future generations is literally at a critical tipping point and few global power brokers and political decision-makers appear to realise the gravity of the situation.

References

  • Altman P, Rowe J, Hoy WE, Brady G, Lefringhausen A, Cosford R, Wauchope B. Did National Security Imperatives Compromise Covid-19 Vaccine Safety?

Read the full article at The Brownstone Institute.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Wrongful Death – Agent Remdesivir

**UPDATE**

Stories continue to pour in on how patients drive to the hospital but leave in body bags due to the ineffective, brutal,  deadly but government subsidized COVID hospital protocols which made people prisoners and actually outright killed people.

https://joeygilbert.substack.com/p/wrongful-death-agent-remdesivir

Wrongful Death – Agent Remdesivir.

“Be not afraid, but speak and don’t keep silent.” Acts 18:9

Joey Gilbert (Attorney)

On December 27, 2022, my colleague and I filed our second Remdesivir Wrongful Death Lawsuit here in the State of Nevada, where we alleged that a Las Vegas hospital and its staff violated Nevada law, medical ethics, acted with negligence, and were motivated by financial incentives in their treatment of patients with COVID-19.

In November of 2020, a Nevada woman developed COVID-19 and was transported to the hospital with mild symptoms.  After providing their medical diagnosis, the physicians admitted her to a general medical room and placed her on a Bi-Pap machine to assist with her breathing.  Everything was normal for her on November 23.  For reasons unknown, those physicians started her on a 4-day course of the deadly drug Remdesivir.  (See link for article)

__________________

Summary:

  • After being stabilized, for reasons unknown, they weaned her off the Bi-Pap machine and moved her into ICU.
  • Despite being stabilized, physicians intubated her because of ‘respiratory failure.’
  • Four days after her Remdesivir treatment she developed seizures, went into hypotensive shock with renal failure, and subsequently died.
  • Remdesivir has a frightening history and was pulled from a controlled trial for Ebola due to high death rates (53%).
    • Remdesivir is ineffective
    • Remdesivir is toxic and causes kidney poisoning, fluid in the lungs, organ damage, and death
    • Remdesivir received EUA designation in 2020 for COVID by the NIH panel, of which 9 had financial ties to Gilead Sciences – Remdesivir’s manufacturer.
  • Under EUA designation, a product can not be mandated by law.  Patients must provide consent including the fact:
    • they have a 99.7% chance of surviving COVID without it
    • their odds of dying increases exponentially if it is administered
    • odds of survival decrease exponentially when Remdesivir is combined with intubation
  • In this case, neither the patient nor the family were advised of or provided with this information
  • The patient was given Remdesivir as part of a protocol which enriched the hospital financially, affecting their professional judgement, yet hurt the patient
  • It is a violation of Nevada law to administer unnecessary medical treatment and without consent
  • Patients coming to the hospital are:
    • separated from family
    • declared to be in ICU even when they are not
    • told Remdesivir is the only available and safe treatment
    • told if they leave the hospital “against medical advice” their insurance will be voided
    • placed on a Bi-Pap machine at a high rate, making it difficult to breathe, and have their hands tied down so they can’t take it off their face
    • deemed “agitated” by a psychiatrist if they struggle and are placed on morphine
    • given Remdesivir, Benedryl, and Tylenol which dry out their lungs which overloads their kidneys and are denied food and water
    • often intubated and placed on other drugs that are contraindicated for use with Remdesivir
    • left to die, which on average takes about nine days
    • The state of Nevada received $1 BILLION from the CARES Act
      • $241 MILLION in direct cash payments were distributed to Medicare providers
      • $88 MILLION was given in grant funding from CDC to be used for enhanced testing and contact tracing
      • $70 MILLION was distributed to health care providers and community health services to address costs associated with the pandemic
  • Hospitals can charge THREE different rates for COVID diagnosed patients (which have varied between 2020-2022)
    • $3,200 per out patient
    • $111,213 per in patient (noncomplex)
    • $461,780 per patient (complex) 
    • All that is required to move a patient from noncomplex to complex is to be intubated or placed in ICU status
    • Medicare has provided a code that permits a 20% NCTAP bonus, collected on the entire bill, distributed to hospitals who offer Remdesivir as an exclusive option

_________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, Viruses

BREAKING: Another Vaccine Researcher Calls for COVID Shots to be Withdrawn

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/health-news/breaking-researcher-claims-mrna-covid-19-vaccines-can-increase-serious-adverse-events-calls-for-it-to-be-withdrawn-from-the-market  Video Here (Approx. 3 Min)

Breaking! Researcher claims mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can increase serious adverse events; calls for it to be withdrawn from the market

By – TIMESOFINDIA.COM

Updated: Jan 9, 2023
Breaking! Researcher claims mRNA COVID-19 vaccines can increase serious adverse events; calls for it to be withdrawn from the market
Image credit: Joseph Fraiman via Dr Aseem Malhotra/Twitter
Joseph Fraiman, an emergency physician and a clinical scientist from Louisiana, claims that the messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine can increase serious adverse events in people, including sudden cardiac deaths.
In a video that surfaced online, Fraiman, who was a lead author of the peer reviewed research that re-analysed Pfizer & Moderna trials for mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, says,
“We found the vaccine increases serious adverse events at a rate of one in 800. At the time of the publication, my co-authors and I did not believe our single study warranted the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines from the market. However, since its publication, new pieces of evidence have come to light and this has caused me to reevaluate my position.” ~ Dr. Joseph Fraiman
________________
**Comment**
Fraiman’s study done all the way back in Sept. 2022, reviewed research that reanalyzed the Pfizer and Moderna trials which found the “vaccines” increases serious adverse events at a rate of 1 in 800.  Dr. John Campbell goes over  it here.
Sadly, nothing was said about this high rate of adverse reactions by our corrupt public health authorities, and the researchers quietly published their paper and didn’t speak up because they felt more research needed to be done.  Meanwhile, thousands have been maimed or have perished.
Importantly:
“Now we have multiple autopsy studies that find essentially conclusive evidence that the ‘vaccines’ are inducing sudden cardiac deaths, yet the rate of these ‘vaccine’ deaths remains unknown.”  ~ Dr. Joseph Fraiman
He then adds that nations using the mRNA injections have experienced excess mortality that correlates with the “vaccine” rollout & booster campaign.  There is a correlation between nations with high excess mortality and high “vaccine” uptake.  Researchers analyzing this data were unable to identify any other reasonable cause other than the “vaccines.”
Go here to see Edward Dowd‘s Excess Mortality Project, VAERS Data Project, and VSAFE Data Project.

In this 3 minute video, cardiologist Dr. McCullough describes two teenage boys who die after days 3 & 4 after the Pfizer shot.  The autopsies showed death due to “vaccine” induced myocarditis.

It doesn’t get any clearer than this.
Sadly, this is too little, too late for many people.

http:// Approx. 10 Min

WI Senator Ron Johnson Sounds the Alarm Over “Vaccine” Injuries

Jan. 2023

For more:

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, vaccines, Viruses

7 Facts Fauci Hid And Peter Hotez Vies for Power As Fauci Steps Down

http://  (Approx. 6 Min)

7 Facts Fauci Hid

Jan. 9, 2023

Key Lesson: Dr. Fauci Misled the Country and knew the following:
  1. American tax dollars went to EcoHealth which was then funneled to the Chinese Wuhan Lab.
  2. EcoHealth was given an exemption from the pause on ‘gain of function’ research.
  3. The security standards at the lab were deficient.
  4. EcoHealth was not in compliance with their reporting requirements according to the contract.
  5. ‘Gain of Function’ research was in fact being done in the Wuhan lab in China.
  6. The P3CO interagency review process wasn’t followed in approving in the grant to EcoHealth.
  7. The virus likely came from the Wuhan lab American tax dollars went to.

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2023/January/PDF/peter-hotez-vies-power-fauci-steps-down-pdf.pdf

Peter Hotez Vies for Power as Fauci Steps Down

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
Jan. 7, 2023

STORY AT-A-GLANCE

  • Dr. Peter Hotez, dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, is enamored with dangerous virus tinkering, censorship and state-directed cyberattacks on civilians. He decries the benefits of whole food and nutrition and is a leading advocate for biomedical tyranny and the murder of independent thinkers
  • In a professionally produced PR video for the World Health Organization, Hotez refers to vaccine safety advocates as “anti-science aggressors” and claims “anti-vaccine activism” has become “a major killing force globally”
  • Hotez ignores data showing the jab does more harm than good. For example, a recent Cleveland Clinic study concluded that the risk of COVID-19 infection “increased with the number of vaccine doses previously received”
  • Cleveland Clinic also found the bivalent COVID-19 booster was only 30% effective in preventing infection “during the time when the virus strains dominant in the community were represented in the vaccine”
  • In the fall of 2021, about 3 in 10 adults who died from COVID-19 were jabbed or boosted. By April 2022, 6 in 10 adults who died from COVID-19 were jabbed or boosted, and that remained true through August 2022, which is the latest data available

As Dr. Anthony Fauci steps down from his position as director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and top chief of the American bioweapons program, the scene is open for another word-wrangling science bungler to step into the limelight.

Seemingly vying for the position of lead propagandist for Big Pharma and the global Deep State is Dr. Peter Hotez, dean for the National School of Tropical Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine, Houston — a scientist enamored with dangerous virus tinkering, censorship and state-directed cyberattacks on civilians, who decries the benefits of whole food and nutrition and is a leading advocate for biomedical tyranny and the murder of independent thinkers.

Vaccine Safety Advocates Are Now ‘Anti-Science Aggressors’

An M.D. who writes articles on Substack under the moniker A Midwestern Doctor recently addressed the hateful rhetoric being thrown about by Hotez.1 “Although I am used to seeing inflammatory approaches … being used to silence debates, I was nonetheless quite taken aback by the WHO’s recent tweet,” he writes.

The WHO tweeted out a video2 (above) featuring Hotez, in which he refers to vaccine safety advocates as “anti-science aggressors” — a term he coined in a 2021 article3 — and claims “anti-vaccine activism” has become “a major killing force globally.”4 According to Hotez, 200,000 Americans lost their lives to COVID-19 because they refused the experimental COVID jab.

Hotez goes on to claim that “anti-science now kills more people than gun violence, global terrorism, nuclear proliferation or cyber attacks” — a statement that makes anti-science sound threatening but actually absolves it, seeing how nuclear proliferation and cyber attacks have killed no one (at least not to my knowledge), and the death toll from terrorism is infinitesimal compared to things like preventable medical errors.

Pouring additional fuel to the fire, he makes the absolute statement that the anti-vaccine movement is a “far-right” political movement. “This is the new face of anti-science aggression,” he says, “so we need political solutions to address this.” In other words, he wants government to pull out the big guns and enforce a one-sided “consensus.”

Hotez Stirs the Pot With Flawed Assumptions

As explained by A Midwestern Doctor, the central claim in that video appears to be based on an October 2021 study5 that estimated 163,000 COVID-19 deaths “could have been prevented by vaccination since June 2021, when safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines were widely available to all adults in the U.S.” However, as A Midwestern Doctor points out, there are several problems with this argument:6

•“Since so many deaths not caused by COVID-19 have been classified as COVID-19 deaths, we don’t actually know how many people died from the illness (this study just assumed the official but inflated figure as accurate).

•In Pfizer’s trial, the survival benefit from the vaccine worsened with time (this has also been observed outside the trials), and at 6 months follow-up (where the trial was abruptly terminated).

•More people who were vaccinated died than those who were unvaccinated (which means that it is impossible that there could have been a net gain of life through vaccinating). Since this is the longest clinical trial that was performed on the vaccines, its conclusion must stand until a longer trial is conducted.

•The vaccines we are using have caused SARS-CoV-2 to rapidly evolve into variants for which it no longer offers protection. For this reason, the alleged benefits of the vaccine have had to be continually modified because it failed to meet each of its previously promised metrics (e.g., it does not prevent transmission of COVID-197).

•The study fails to account for the fact that national death rates consistently increased or stayed the same (but never decrease) following COVID vaccination campaigns …

Video Link

•The estimate also fails to account for the fact that life insurance data has shown that there has been an unprecedented spike in deaths for age groups rarely expected to otherwise die, following the mass vaccination campaigns.”

Research Shows COVID Jab Raises Risk of COVID-19 Infection

Hotez, the WHO and the PR firm that made that video also ignore data showing that the COVID jab increases your risk of contracting COVID-19 over time. For example, a Cleveland Clinic preprint8 posted December 19, 2022, concluded that the risk of COVID-19 infection “increased … with the number of vaccine doses previously received.”

Moreover, the bivalent COVID-19 booster was only 30% effective in preventing infection “during the time when the virus strains dominant in the community were represented in the vaccine.”

bivalent covid-19 booster

So much for “safe and effective.” The boosters provide minimal protection when well-matched to the circulating strain, and as its protection wanes, it leaves you at higher risk of infection than before. Deceiving people into taking this product? Now THAT’S anti-scientific aggression.

The Jabbed Now Account for Most COVID-19 Deaths

We also have U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention data that confirm Cleveland Clinic’s findings. As reported by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF):9

“The share of COVID-19 deaths among those who are vaccinated has risen. In fall 2021, about 3 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted. But by January 2022, as we showed in an analysis10 posted on the Peterson-KFF Health System Tracker, about 4 in 10 deaths were vaccinated or boosted.

By April 2022, the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data11 show that about 6 in 10 adults dying of COVID-19 were vaccinated or boosted, and that’s remained true through at least August 2022 (the most recent month of data).

covid-19 deaths by vaccination status

The data from this chart come from the CDC, which collects data on the number of deaths by vaccination status from 30 health departments (including states and cities) across the country.

In order to be counted as vaccinated, a person must be at least two weeks out from completing their primary series … Similarly, to be counted as having a booster, a person must be at least two weeks out from their booster or additional dose before testing positive. People who were partially vaccinated are not included in this data.”

The irony here is that the data Hotez cites in the video match an earlier KFF Health System report, but when he was presented with the updated dataset from the same source, now showing that 170,000 vaxxed Americans have died from COVID, he simply blocked the person who shared it.12

A Poster-Boy for Emotional and Physical Ill Health

Of course, maintaining a propaganda narrative demands that you ignore everything that might poke holes in it, and Hotez is no stranger to propaganda tactics. He’s been a relentless vaccine pusher and denier of vaccine-induced autism, even though (or perhaps because) his own child is autistic. As noted by A Midwestern Doctor:13

“Prior to this recent push to criminalize those questioning vaccine safety (which is evil), I viewed him as a comical individual who I genuinely felt bad for, and someone — who like many that do immense harm to the world — is simply controlled by habitual fixations they are never able to move beyond.

I have not done a deep dive into his background. However, everything I’ve seen is consistent with an unhappy, frustrated individual who frequently gets scammed by life and is both physically and emotionally unhealthy.”

Video Link

Case in point: Hotez’s Joe Rogan interview (clip of which is featured in the video above), where he admitted being a junk food-aholic and intends to stay that way. Rogan, who is neither a doctor nor a nutritionist, actually ended up lecturing Hotez about the merits of a healthy diet. As noted by Dr. Pierre Kory:14

“In just a few minutes, Peter Hotez inadvertently shows the world exactly what has gone wrong with our medical system and why his endless push for more vaccines will never create health.”

Indeed, as Ryan Cristiàn, editor-in-chief of The Last American Vagabond, points out in the video above, Hotez nonchalantly discusses his unhealthy choices (and on the largest podcast on the planet) as if it’s perfectly OK to cast the foundations for health aside — because we have vaccines.

“I think he genuinely, to some degree, doesn’t understand why that’s so stupid,” Cristiàn says. “But on the other side of it, there’s obviously a push to make it about, ‘that’s not real health [i.e., food and lifestyle], vaccines are real health.’ It’s just this alarming undertone.”

What’s in a Vaccine?

In that Rogan interview,15 Hotez also makes the ridiculously unscientific claim that vaccines contain just antigens in saline, basically mimicking an advertisement by the Colorado department of health (below). Anyone who knows anything about vaccines — especially the COVID shot — can see how utterly and shamefully deceptive this is.

covid vaccine ingredients

Another gross piece of propaganda was recently put out by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) (video16 below). The ad chastises the West for withholding COVID shots from Africa, resulting in it having one of the lowest jab rates in the world.

Set three years into the future, it claims the virus kept mutating into ever more dangerous variants, which is the complete opposite of what’s been happening in the real world. It portrays Africa as a continent ravaged by COVID-19 due to lack of COVID shots, yet in the real world, Africa has fared far better in terms of cases and deaths than highly-jabbed nations. Frankly, it’s so distorted and contrary to facts, it’s hard to watch.

Hotez Implicated in Creation of Chimeric Coronavirus

Since the beginning of the COVID outbreak, Hotez has repeatedly accused those who disagree with him of committing a hate crime, which is a rather infantile defense mechanism. It’s quite typical for people who know they have no grounds for their argument to resort to name-calling and threats instead.

Not only has he called on government to use its military and intelligence forces to quash public discussion about COVID jab dangers, he’s also been a vocal defender of the natural origin theory, dismissing evidence of a lab leak as pure fiction and conspiracy theory.

This too is an example of that same defense mechanism. It was recently revealed that Hotez funded risky gain-of-function research on coronaviruses in Wuhan, China, so no wonder he wanted people to shut up about the possibility of the virus being a lab creation. His own work might be implicated in its creation. As reported by U.S. Right to Know (USRTK):17

“While casting concerns about Wuhan’s labs as ‘fringe,’ Hotez has not mentioned his own connection to a project involving a laboratory-generated chimeric SARS-related coronavirus that has come under Congress’ microscope. The project was helmed by Zhengli Shi, a senior scientist and ‘virus hunter’ at the Wuhan Institute of Virology nicknamed the ‘Bat Lady.’

As part of his NIH grant, Hotez subcontracted funding for research on combined or ‘chimeric’ coronaviruses, a scientific paper18 shows. Hotez’s grant19 underwrote two of Shi’s collaborators on the project.

In the 2017 paper20 co-funded by Hotez, Shi and her colleagues generated a recombinant virus from two SARS-related coronaviruses: ‘rWIV1-SHC014S.’ It’s not clear whether the paper co-funded by Hotez should have been stopped under a temporary ‘pause’ on gain-of-function work before 2017.

However, some independent biosecurity experts have said research on this chimeric virus in some ways epitomizes lapses in NIH oversight of risky research in the years before the COVID-19 pandemic.

A prior study21 of one of the coronaviruses that comprised the chimera, WIV1, found it to be ‘poised for human emergence.’ Another prior paper22 on the other coronavirus, SHC014, stated that its future study in lab-generated viruses may be ‘too risky to pursue.’

‘The work here should have been at the very least, heavily scrutinized,’ said David Relman, a Stanford microbiologist and biosecurity expert. ‘This work should have been heavily reviewed for [gain-of-function], and probably should have been subject to the pause prior to December 2017.'”

Hotez, One of the Most Shockingly Hateful People in Medicine

Hotez has made headlines a number of times through the years, typically delivering some kind of hateful rhetoric. He’s publicly stated he wants to “snuff out” vaccine skeptics,23 for example, and in May 2021 called for cyberwarfare measures to be deployed against people who share vaccine safety information.24

Hotez has repeatedly spewed vitriol at parents of vaccine-injured children and called for physical harm and imprisonment of people who don’t agree with the one-size-fits-all vaccine agenda, so it was rather funny when he whined and complained about getting bombarded with “anti-vaxx hate speech” in response to his cyberwarfare call.25

Hotez is not above casting an evil eye on other scientists either. As reported by journalist Paul Thacker in an August 9, 2022, Substack article titled, “Peter Hotez Sees Aggression Everywhere But in the Mirror”:26

“Patrolling scientific discourse, Hotez has a knack for discovering ‘antiscience’ in anyone who disagrees with him. Jeffrey Sachs, economics professor at Columbia University and chair of an international commission on COVID-19, charged in a wide-ranging interview27 last week that the National Institutes of Health and allied scientists were impeding an investigation into how the COVID-19 pandemic started …

Hotez went on the assault, tweeting that Sachs, as leader of the Lancet Commission, did not represent the views of science. Much like a Pentagon general wrapping himself in freedom and the flag to demand more federal monies for another foreign war … Hotez has been shrouding himself in the mantle of science to denigrate anyone who questions taxpayer funding for dangerous virus research by the National Institutes of Health.”

What Is Hotez Really Fighting For?

In his article,28 Thacker goes on to review several other bizarre incidences involving Hotez. For example, he referred to the scientific experts invited to testify before Congress as “fringe elements” testifying and promoting “outlandish conspiracies.” So much for Ph.D.s and med school. He also accused Sen. Rand Paul of promoting conspiracies.

Here’s the take-home: The reason Hotez rails against “anti-science” is because he can sense the danger the research community and vaccine industry are in.

If SARS-CoV-2 is conclusively proven to be a lab creation, it would put a massive spotlight on scientists involved in dual purpose viral research. Gain-of-function research may be banned altogether (as it should), which would sink many a career, including his own.

Similarly, public acknowledgement that the COVID jabs are a public health disaster would permanently and perhaps lethally injure the vaccine industry. So, all that hateful rhetoric? It really comes down to protecting self-serving interests.

– Sources and References

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses