Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

COVID-19 Vaccine & Other Vaccine Updates

http://  (Approx 1 Min)

Dec. 17, 2020

Hospital nurse explains how she and ‘COVID-unit’ staff are excited to get the COVID-19 vaccine and then promptly passes out.

Of course public ‘authorities’ are already in full swing with damage control measures to downplay this.  As you can see from above, Youtube has already removed the video.  To see it, please go here:  https://www.bitchute.com/channel/HlyeDvlqcVJm/  Scroll down to Dec. 18, 2020.  It is believed this nurse has since died:  https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/is-the-tennessee-nurse-who-passed-out-on-live-camera-after-the-covid-vaccine-still-alive/

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/severe-allergic-reactions-reported-after-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-vaccinations/  (Full article here)

Severe Allergic Reactions Reported After Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccinations

Excerpt:

U.K. Health officials stated:

Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine.3   (See link for article)

This interview reveals that phase 3 clinical trials purposely exclude those with a higher risk of vaccine injury, thus the spectrum of adverse events is not representative of those that might occur in reality:  https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/dr-gounder-recommends-waiting-on-covid-vaccine-if-youve-had-a-history-of-severe-allergic-reaction/

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/pfizer-covid-vaccine-trial-shows-alarming-evidence-pathogenic-priming-older-adult  The Pfizer COVID Vaccine Trial Shows Alarming Evidence of Pathogenic Priming in Older Adults.  Solicited serious adverse events — 10-fold increase on second dose in ederly, compared to 3.6-fold for those under 55. 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-12-14-astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-a-dangerous-dud.  (Full article here)

AstraZeneca’s vaccine also has numerous short-comings:

  • The latest data suggests it’s only 62% effective
  • Many trial participants have fallen ill, including several who developed Bell’s Palsy
  • Nobody over 55 years of age was included in the earlier test group, which just so happened to “accidentally” receive only a half dose of the vaccine – which just happened to produce “serendipitous” results for the company.
  • Had older people been included, it’s likely there would have been a lower efficacy rate
  • Only 20% (too small of a sample size) of the highest risk patients in the global trials were over 55 years of age – all of which received much higher doses of the vaccine
  • If you haven’t seen Dr. Weiler’s talk, please see:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/04/medical-freedom-press-conference-must-see-video/  I highlight it in the link.

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/12/vaccination-cards-will-track-everyone-who-gets-a-covid-19-vaccine/  (Full article here)

Vaccination Cards Will Track Everyone Who Gets a COVID-19 Vaccine

Excerpts:

On Dec. 2, 2020, the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) released the first images of the government’s proposed COVID-19 vaccination record card and vaccination kits that include a needle, syringe, alcohol wipes and a mask. The vaccination card, which will be issued to everyone who gets a COVID-19 vaccine, will be used by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to track who gets vaccinated with the first dose of the vaccine.1 2 3 4 5 6

Recipients of the vaccines will be asked to provide their cell phone numbers so pubic health officials can contact vaccinated persons by text and remind them to return to receive a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine three or four weeks later. The two doses of Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 (BNT162b2) need to be given 21 days apart. Moderna’s mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine requires two doses to be given 28 days apart.1 2 4 5 6 7

Each card, written in English and Spanish, will record the first and last name of the person receiving the vaccine, along with their date of birth, medical information, the dates in which they were vaccinated and the name of who performed the vaccination and where. It will provide spaces to record the name of the vaccine given and the name of its manufacturer. It will also have spaces that could be used to record additional booster shots in the future.36

Evidently CVS and Walgreens have established very elaborate tracking systems to set up appointments and notify people.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/protecting-our-future/flu-shot-facts/?

Children’s Health Defense has put together Flu Vaccine Facts and resources

(Go to link for resources)

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/12/14/covid-19-vaccine-cicp.aspx  (Full article here)

Tricks They’re Playing to Get You Vaccinated

  • a proposal to pay each vaccine recipient $1,500
  • a suggested $1,000 pandemic stimulus payment incumbent on COVID-19 vaccination
  • companies to make COVID-19 vaccination a condition of employment (if your employer mandates the vaccine, they will not be liable for side effects).  For an excellent read on how to avoid mandates:  https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/how-to-avoid-mask-mandates-vaccine-mandates-at-work/
  • some companies are dangling carrots by promising that vaccinated employees will be able to forgo temperature checks and/or other PPE requirements and others are giving out cash bonuses to those who get vaccinated
  • renaming adverse reactions as “immune responses,” to make it more palatable
  • Canadians who refuse the COVID-19 vaccine should be prepared to comply with a mandatory mask rule and to be restricted in their ability to move about society

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/11/13/how-theyll-fake-the-success-of-the-covid-vaccine/  (Go here for full article)

How They’ll Fake the Success of the COVID Vaccine

  1. They will change the way the PCR test is done by lowering the number of cycles so there are fewer positive test results, which will make it appear to stop new cases 

  2. They will restrict the definition of a “COVID case”, for example demanding a fever of 100 for 48 consecutive hours. The drop in cases will be attributed to the vaccine. 

  3. If more fear and punishment is desired however, a reverse technique will be applied by cycling PCR tests upward and lessening the requirements for a “COVID case”
  4. Any harm or death caused by the vaccine will be attributed to COVID-19
  5. Many other tactics are listed (many of which have already been done)

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

‘Adverse Reactions’ Renamed ‘Immune Responses’ By Health Advisers And 21 Serious Possible Adverse Outcomes to COVID-19 Vaccine

https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/covid-19-vaccine-bombshell-fda-documents-reveal-death-21-serious-conditions

COVID-19 Vaccine Bombshell: FDA Documents Reveal DEATH + 21 Serious Conditions As Possible Adverse Outcomes

© [12/6/20] GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here //www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.”

Public discussion and documents reveal that the FDA knows that rushed-to-market COVID-19 vaccines may cause a wide range of life-threatening side effects, including death.

Unless the public is made aware of their real effects, and is given a choice, their widespread coercive promotion as “safe and effective” and “necessary” violates the medical ethical principle of informed consent.

Act now via Stand for Health Freedom to stand up for your rights! 

A US Food & Drug Administration advisory committee meeting titled, “Vaccines and Related Biological Products,” presented online on October 22, 2020, included a 27 slide powerpoint presentation by Steve Anderson, PhD, MPP Director, Office of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Slide 16 of his presentation included a “DRAFT Working list of possible adverse event outcomes” associated with the imminent rollout of COVID-19 vaccines subject to FDA safety surveillance, showing that death, as well as 21 other conditions (most of which are possibly life-threatening), are listed as possible adverse outcomes of the COVID-19 vaccines. 

In the video below, Steve Anderson discusses the presentation, which we have fast-forwarded to slide 16: 

View the full powerpoint presentation from the FDA website here.

The implications of this presentation are highly concerning. FDA staff are clearly aware of the possibly lethal side effects of the COVID-19 vaccines and are preparing in advance to be on the look out for such adverse outcomes through “post-marketing survellience.” This approach violates the precautionary principle, which requires that a medical intervention be proven safe before being released onto the market. If it is known that the product may cause harm, and especially death, in advance, and still released without the public being fully informed of these risks, this constitutes an egregious violation of the medical ethical principles established through the Nuremberg code in order to prevent human rights violations. 

TWO IMMEDIATE CALLS TO ACTION

1) The time is NOW to stand up for your fundamental human health rights and demand from your lawmakers and elected officials that COVID-19 (and all vaccines) be voluntary and not mandatory. Please join us by taking action on the Stand For Health Freedom digital advocacy platform. 

ACT NOW: Tell your governor and local legislators that COVID-19 vaccines must be voluntary!

2) There are two upcoming FDA advisory committee deadlines coming up for public comments ton the COVID-19 vaccines on Dec 10th and Dec. 17th. These will be livestreamed. Attend and make a comment!

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee December 10, 2020 Meeting Announcement

https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-december-10-2020-meeting-announcement

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee December 17, 2020 Meeting Announcement

https://www.fda.gov/advisory-committees/advisory-committee-calendar/vaccines-and-related-biological-products-advisory-committee-december-17-2020-meeting-announcement

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of GreenMedInfo or its staff.
______________________________________
 
For more on the COVID-19 vaccine:  
 
And in another ‘slight of hand’ similar to the CDC’s discontinuing counting the seasonal flu to boost COVID numbers, they are now redefining vaccine ‘adverse reactions’ to the more palatable ‘immune responses.’
 

https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2020/12/02/health-advisers-rename-_1820_adverse-reactions_1920_-to-covid19-vaccine

Health Advisers Rename ‘Adverse Reactions’ to COVID-19 Vaccine

December 02, 2020

By Dr. Mercola

If you start hearing about “immune responses” that many people have in conjunction with the COVID-19 vaccine, be aware: This is the new name for adverse reactions.

In other words, the COVID-19 vaccine no longer has “adverse reactions” but, rather, the bad side effects you feel — some of which could be very serious — are now called “immune responses.”

This information was buried at the bottom of an article by CNBC in connection with the news that 10% to 15% of vaccine recipients will suffer “significantly” noticeable” side effects. Some health officials are concerned that the connotation of “side effects” and “adverse reactions” may be off-putting to the public, so in an attempt to reprogram how you think about the side effects, one health practitioner suggested changing the definition of “adverse reactions” to “immune response.”

The term “immune response” should be used even if what you’re feeling is bad enough for you to stay home from work, they said. Health officials also admitted they have no idea whether there are any long-term adverse reactions to the vaccine such as delayed autoimmune disease or other safety concerns.

SOURCE: CNBC December 1, 2020

___________________

**Comment**

For Wisconsin’s Vaccine Requirements:  https://www.nvic.org/vaccine-laws/state-vaccine-requirements/wisconsin.aspx

Thankfully, our state allows for 3 ways for vaccines to be waived: Medical, Philosphical, and Religious exemptions are in place; however, these freedoms are continually being attacked.  Join NVIC for updates and information on vaccines.

Category:

vaccines, Viruses

Portuguese Court: PCR Test Are Unreliable & Unlawful to Quarantine People

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/portuguese-court-rules-pcr-tests-as-unreliable-unlawful-to-quarantine-people/

Portuguese Court Rules PCR Tests As Unreliable & Unlawful To Quarantine People

by GreatGameIndia.com

A Portuguese appeals court has ruled that PCR tests are unreliable and that it is unlawful to quarantine people based solely on a PCR test.

The court stated, the test’s reliability depends on the number of cycles used and the viral load present. Citing Jaafar et al. 2020, the court concludes that:

if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the rule in most laboratories in Europe and the US), the probability that said person is infected is less than 3%, and the probability that said result is a false positive is 97%.  (See link for article)

_______________________

**Comment**

The article goes onto state that cycles for PCR tests in India is also high (between 37-40) but that cycle threshold in Portugal is unknown.

Important excerpt:

The standard coronavirus tests are throwing up a huge number of positive cases daily. These tests are done based on faulty WHO protocols which are designed to include false positives cases as well.

The test will come back positive even if there are pieces of dead virus.

Earlier, the WHO’s testing protocol was even questioned by Finland’s national health authority.

I’ve posted on this faulty PCR test for months:

COVID-19 Testing Scam, 8 in 10 Are False Positives

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/11/19/covid-testing-fraud-fuels-casedemic.  Must see video by Del Bigtree on this ‘casedemic’.  Another brief video on cycle threshold is also in link.

STORY AT-A-GLANCE
  • The PCR test is not designed to be used as a diagnostic tool as it cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and “live” or reproductive ones
  • Many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected via PCR swab far too many times, which results in healthy people testing “positive” even if their viral load is very low or the virus is inactive and poses no threat
  • Amplification over 35 cycles is considered unreliable and scientifically unjustified. Dr. Anthony Fauci has admitted the chances of a positive result being accurate at 35 cycles or more “are minuscule.” Yet the CDC, FDA and WHO all recommend using 40 to 45 cycles
  • Recent research shows that to maximize accuracy, PCR tests for COVID-19 should use far fewer cycles. At 17 cycles, 100% of the positive results were confirmed to be real positives. Above 17 cycles, accuracy drops dramatically. By the time you get to 33 cycles, the accuracy rate is a mere 20%, meaning 80% are false positives
  • When symptomatic, your chances of getting a true positive on the first day of symptom onset is only about 40%. Not until Day 3 from symptom onset do you have an 80% chance of getting an accurate PCR result
Lastly, 87,000 doctors and nurses are speaking out against the COVID narrative as well as the fact they are against mandatory COVID vaccines.  All the trials are based upon this faulty PCR test:

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/29/87000-doctors-nurses-against-covid19-vaccine/

Say “No’ to mandatory vaccines:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/14/community-and-world-united-we-say-no/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/30/say-no-to-forced-covid-19-vaccination-sign-petition/

Category:

Activism, Testing, vaccines, Viruses

UK Government Warns Doctors About COVID Vaccine But Not Patients

https://healthimpactnews.com/2020/uk-government-warns-doctors-about-infertility-possibility-with-pfizer-covid-vaccine-but-no-warning-to-patients/

UK Government Warns Doctors About Infertility Possibility with Pfizer COVID Vaccine, But NO Warning to Patients!

Dec. 5, 2020

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

As we reported earlier this week, the U.K. became the first nation to issue emergency authorization for the Pfizer experimental mRNA COVID vaccine, with jabs expected to start with the public any day now. See:

BREAKING! UK First to Approve Pfizer COVID Vaccine as Former Head of Pfizer Research Says Vaccine Can Make Females Infertile

The UK Department of Health and Social Care and the Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency has just published guidelines for the roll out of Pfizer vaccine.

There is a 10-page document for UK Healthcare Professionals, and a shorter 5-page document for recipients. This is public information (for now), and Health Impact News has secured copies of each.

In the leaflet for recipients, it gives strict warnings to women who are pregnant and breast-feeding.

Pregnancy and breast-feeding
There is currently limited data available on the use of this vaccine in pregnant women. If you are pregnant or breast-feeding, think you may be pregnant or are planning to have a baby, ask your doctor or pharmacist for advice before you receive this vaccine. As a precaution, you should avoid becoming pregnant until at least 2 months after the vaccine.

However, in the longer document issued to “Healthcare Professionals,” it gives an additional warning (see red highlight):

4.6 Fertility, pregnancy and lactation

Pregnancy
There are no or limited amount of data from the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2. Animal reproductive toxicity studies have not been completed. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is not recommended during pregnancy. For women of childbearing age, pregnancy should be excluded before vaccination. In addition, women of childbearing age should be advised to avoid pregnancy for at least 2 months after their second dose.

Breast-feeding
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 is excreted in human milk. A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should not be used during breast-feeding.

Fertility
It is unknown whether COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 has an impact on fertility.

Why was this warning not included in the leaflet to be distributed to the recipients of the vaccine? The leaflet to the recipients starts out with this text:

Read all of this leaflet carefully before you receive this vaccine because it contains important
information for you.

* Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again.
* If you have any further questions, ask your doctor, pharmacist or nurse.
* If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor, pharmacist or nurse. This includes any possible
side effects not listed in this leaflet. See section 4.

So after someone reads the shorter leaflet prior to deciding whether or not to get the vaccine, the only way a young woman would know about the warning about potential infertility issues, would be if they asked their doctor or other healthcare provider a specific question about fertility.

And even then, it is dependent upon that doctor having completely read the longer document, and answering the young woman’s question on fertility issues accurately.

If you live in the UK, please print out the longer document published for the doctors, and make sure everyone you know who is considering getting this vaccine reads it, and not just the shorter document published for “recipients.”

As we have previously reported, Dr. Michael Yeadon, the former head of Pfizer research, filed a STAY OF ACTION with the European Medicines Agency, together with Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, and he warned them about the potential effects of this vaccine on fertility, as he wrote that the experimental Pfizer COVID vaccine is:

expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1 (see Gallaher, B., “Response to nCoV2019 Against Backdrop of Endogenous Retroviruses” – http://virological.org/t/response-to-ncov2019-against-backdrop-of-endogenous-retroviruses/396), which is derived from human endogenous retroviruses (HERV) and is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses.

There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile.

To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.

According to section 10.4.2 of the Pfizer/BioNTech trial protocol, a woman of childbearing potential (WOCBP) is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and is using an acceptable contraceptive method as described in the trial protocol during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention).

This means that it could take a relatively long time before a noticeable number of cases of postvaccination infertility could be observed. (Source.)

Why Only People Over the Age of 16?

The other issue brought out in these guidelines that raises serious questions, is why are they only recommending the vaccine for individuals over the age of 16? They state:

The safety and efficacy of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in children under 16 years of age have not yet been established.

But one of the trial groups that tested the vaccine had children between the age of 12 and 15. From the longer document for doctors:

Study BNT162-01 (Study 1) enrolled 60 participants, 18 through 55 years of age. Study C4591001 (Study 2) enrolled approximately 44,000 participants, 12 years of age or older.

In Study 2, a total of 21,720 participants 16 years of age or older received at least one dose of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b and 21,728 participants 16 years of age or older received placebo.

Unless I am missing something here, or my math is off, if there were 44,000 participants in Study 2 that were 12 years of age and older, and “21,720 participants 16 years of age or older received at least one dose of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b and 21,728 participants 16 years of age or older received placebo,” then that means 552 participants were children between the age of 12 and 15.

That is more than the total of Study 1, which included only 60 participants between the age of 18 and 55.

So what happened to these children between the ages of 12 and 15? They were obviously included in the study for a reason. Did parents actually give their consent to include these children? Or were they wards of the Government having been medically kidnapped from their parents, so that consent was not necessary?

Also, what is the percentage of participants above the age of 55, the group most at risk? They were not even included in Study 1, for some reason.

Other Warnings

From the longer document issued to doctors:

4.4 Special warnings and precautions for use

Traceability

In order to improve the traceability of biological medicinal products, the name and the batch number of the administered product should be clearly recorded.

General recommendations

As with all injectable vaccines, appropriate medical treatment and supervision should always be readily available in case of a rare anaphylactic event following the administration of the vaccine.

The administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 should be postponed in individuals suffering from acute severe febrile illness.

Individuals receiving anticoagulant therapy or those with a bleeding disorder that would contraindicate intramuscular injection, should not be given the vaccine unless the potential benefit clearly outweighs the risk of administration.

Immunocompromised persons, including individuals receiving immunosuppressant therapy, may have a diminished immune response to the vaccine. No data are available about concomitant use of immunosuppressants.

As with any vaccine, vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 may not protect all vaccine recipients.

No data are available on the use of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 in persons that have previously received a full or partial vaccine series with another COVID-19 vaccine.

Excipient information

This vaccine contains potassium, less than 1 mmol (39 mg) per dose, i.e. essentially ‘potassium-free’. This vaccine contains less than 1 mmol sodium (23 mg) per dose, i.e. essentially ‘sodium‑free’.

4.5 Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction

No interaction studies have been performed.

Concomitant administration of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 with other vaccines has not been studied (see section 5.1).

Do not mix COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 with other vaccines/products in the same syringe.

4.8 Undesirable effects

Adverse reactions reported in clinical studies are listed in this section per MedDRA system organ class, in decreasing order of frequency and seriousness. The frequency is defined as follows: very common (≥ 1/10), common (≥ 1/100 to < 1/10), uncommon (≥ 1/1,000 to < 1/100), rare (≥ 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000), very rare (< 1/10,000), not known (cannot be estimated from available data).

  • Blood and lymphatic system disorders
  • Uncommon: Lymphadenopathy
  • Nervous system disorders
  • Very common: Headache
  • Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
  • Very common: Arthralgia; myalgia
  • General disorders and administration site conditions
  • Very common: Injection-site pain; fatigue; chills; pyrexia
  • Common: Redness at injection site; injection site swelling
  • Uncommon: Malaise
  • Gastrointestinal disorders
  • Common Nausea

Massive Amounts of Casualties Expected?

The Independent announced this week that the UK government has granted Pfizer legal indemnity protecting it from being sued for any injuries or deaths due to the experimental COVID vaccine.

The UK government has granted pharmaceutical giant Pfizer a legal indemnity protecting it from being sued, enabling its coronavirus vaccine to be rolled out across the country as early as next week.

The Department of Health and Social Care has confirmed the company has been given an indemnity protecting it from legal action as a result of any problems with the vaccine.

Ministers have also changed the law in recent weeks to give new protections to companies such as Pfizer, giving them immunity from being sued by patients in the event of any complications.

NHS staff providing the vaccine, as well as manufacturers of the drug, are also protected.

In a press conference with journalists on Wednesday, Ben Osborn, Pfizer’s UK managing director, refused to explain why the company needed an indemnity.

He said: “We’re not actually disclosing any of the details around any of the aspects of that agreement and specifically around the liability clauses.” (Source.)

In October, the UK government’s Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), posted a bid request stating that “For reasons of extreme urgency,” they seek “an Artificial Intelligence (AI) software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction (ADRs).”

The request goes on to explain that:

“it is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of ADRs that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine,” and that this “represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.”

Time is Short for the U.K.!

The only thing that can now stop the possible genocide of a majority of the public in areas where this experimental vaccine is rolled out is massive public resistance.

The authorities in the U.K. are probably expecting this, especially given the recent protests against the lockdowns, so they are ready to deploy the military, just as President Trump is also doing in the U.S.

The British Army’s Information Warfare Unit is being deployed to deal with “anti-vaccine propaganda” heading into the rollout of the vaccine, The Daily Mail reports. The unit was launched in 2010 and is part of the Army’s 77th Brigade, which “often works with psychological operations”.

In fact, “soldiers are already monitoring cyberspace for Covid-19 content”, the report reveals. The move comes as a response to a growing number of both anti-lockdown and anti-vaccine protests. Late last week, for example, more than 155 anti-lockdown protesters organized in Central London, marching through Westminster and chanting “shame on you” and “freedom”.

Others waved signs reading “All I want for Christmas is my freedom back”, “Ditch the face masks” and “Stop controlling us”. The country is implementing similar fines and restrictions for businesses as the U.S. government. And, similarly, businesses are starting to take matters into their own hands and defy lockdown orders. (Source.)

Spread this information far and wide while you still can. Print out and copy the videos from these articles as well, because an Internet blackout was part of the Event 201 Plandemic simulation, so we should expect that to happen at some point.

See Also:

____________________

For more:  

Lastly, please note the serious limitations of these vaccine trials:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/19/covidgate-the-corruption-of-clinical-trials-part-1/

  1. No one knows length of protection of the vaccine
  2. No one knows how this affects children as schools prepare to mandate the vaccine to obtain an education
  3. No one knows the synergistic effects of this vaccine with others
  4. No one knows the long-term effects of this vaccine
  5. The Pfizer clinical data is explained here: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/14/pfizer-covid-vaccine-frenzy-high-volume-of-adverse-reactions-expected/
  6. The Moderna trial is also being tested on those with a low risk of COVID
  7. ZERO trials were designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcomes (hospital admission, intensive care, or death)
  8. ZERO trials are designed to determine if they interrupt viral transmission
  9. Moderna’s trial lacks adequate statistical power to assess severe COVID-19 outcomes.  The reason?  Hospital admissions and deaths are too uncommon in the study population of 30,000 people

And we finally have data comparing the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/11/30/landmark-study-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-children/  The data indicate that unvaccinated children in the practice are not unhealthier than the vaccinated and indeed the overall results may indicate that the unvaccinated pediatric patients in this practice are healthier overall than the vaccinated.  And then there’s this:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2017/05/18/first-peer-reviewed-study-of-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-children/  The first peer-reviewed study comparing health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children implicates vaccines in a host of chronic illnesses. 

 
 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Medical Freedom Press Conference ‘Must See’ Video

http://  Approx. 14 Min

Nov. 26, 2020

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler, research scientist, author, president and CEO for the Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge (IPAK) speaks on numerous topics including important information on the COVID-19 vaccine:

  • Condemns the politicization/commodization of citizens’ health.
  • Coronavirus vaccines historically have a terrible safety record.
  • Coronavirus vaccinated animals got more serious disease and many died.
  • His research has shown that all but one of the proteins in the SARS-CoV2 Virus have “unsafe epitopes” which can cause autoimmunity against proteins in our own body.
  • Research has shown SARS-CoV2 affects many tissues within the body (it’s not just upper respiratory symptoms).
  • People appear to be gravely concerned about getting infected with COVID-19 but have an amazing lack of concern about getting vaccinated with something that will inject these same proteins in the body which can cause autoimmunity.
  • Not a single vaccine manufacturer removed these unsafe epitopes after Weiler notified them.
  • The FDA has allowed COVID vaccine manufacturers to skip the most important safety step of animal testing to see if there is “pathogenic priming.”
  • They are also combining phase 1 & 2 trials speeding the process up further.
  • The only results in are from the Moderna trial were 21% had serious side-effects.
  • He talks about treatments that are working for COVID.
  • He states that tens of thousands and soon hundreds of thousands of medical doctors around the world are coming together to condemn the politicization of coronavirus & public health in general, including vaccines.
  • He states public health officials can not just regurgitate what the CDC has to say.
  • Why do we not hear good news about effective COVID treatments from public health officials?  They are intentionally keeping people in fear.
  • Forced, mandatory vaccinations is a disproportionate response considering COVID-19’s low mortality rate.  If you are not over 70 years old, you have less of a chance of dying from COVID than from influenza.
  • According to Paul Offit, 75% of the population is required to get the vaccine in order for a 50% efficacy rate for herd immunity.  Already 51% of the population states it will not get the vaccine.
  • It is imperative we do not discount prior immunity in the population from prior exposure to corona viruses as well as COVID-19.
  • We have memory B and T cells in response to coronavirus so we don’t have to carry around antibodies expressing proteins all the time.
  • The fact our public officials are not reducing concern is political and their response to the virus is far worse than the virus itself.
  • He briefly takes on the faulty PCR test. Regardless of being faulty, these tests are being used to shut down businesses.
  • He discusses cleaners used in schools are causing reproductive issues in mice.  
  • He finishes by stating that the national vaccine compensation program is completely corrupt.  He was an expert in that program previously but resigned after someone attempted to bribe him.  HHS determines which vaccines injuries are real but are also the defendant in the case. (The wolf guarding the hen house)

**UPDATE**  Dec. 7, 2020

Weiler just sent a letter to the ACIP, the committee that chooses whether any vaccine and which vaccines are recommended for children, and more recently, for adults.  He warns them of coronavirus vaccines causing “disease enhancement,” or worse health outcomes upon viral infection:  https://jameslyonsweiler.com/2020/12/06/susceptibility-of-people-to-pathogenic-priming-is-a-prime-reason-to-eschew-covid19-vaccine-mandates/

______________________

click

**Comment**

While not mentioned in the video, two sources are now saying the COVID-19 vaccine can cause sterility in women:  

Article on QUATS:  https://www.womensvoices.org/2018/05/08/what-are-quats-and-why-are-they-on-our-list/

For more on the COVID vaccine:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/10/05/covid-19-vaccine-explained/

https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/14/community-and-world-united-we-say-no/

Sign the petition against mandatory vaccinations:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/05/30/say-no-to-forced-covid-19-vaccination-sign-petition/

Vaccine information is important for everyone but Lyme/MSIDS patients are more vulnerable to adverse reactions than the general population due to being infected with numerous things that impair their immune systems.  Please learn all you can before you make a vaccine decision.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses