Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

New DARPA-Like Medical Research Agency to be Part of NIH

https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/arpa-h-to-be-within-nih-but-independently-managed-by-hhs

ARPA-H to Be Within NIH but Independently Managed by HHS

After lobbying efforts from lawmakers and science advisors, the new, DARPA-like biomedical research agency will be a part of the National Institutes of Health, but its director will report directly to the secretary of Health and Human Services.

Natalia Mesa

Apr 1, 2022

Following a lengthy deliberation process, US health secretary Xavier Becerra determined on Wednesday (March 30) that a new high-risk, high-reward biomedical research agency known as ARPA-H will be part of the National Institutes of Health, STAT reports. 

In early March, Congress passed the 2022 US spending bill, which included $1 billion of funds for the Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (ARPA-H), an agency intended to accelerate the pace of biomedical research. The bill gave the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), of which the NIH is a part, the power to decide whether the new agency would be independent or part of the existing institution. This led to a lobbying campaign by several policymakers and researchers to separate the agency from the NIH, which they say is bureaucratic and slow-moving, STAT reported earlier this week.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Important excerpt:

Last year, President Joe Biden called for the creation of the ARPA-H as a biomedical research version of the military’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which is known for risky projects and “blue-sky” thinking.

Oh goody – yet another scary government agency that’s going to do risky stuff with our tax-dollars.

Biden intends to appoint Dr. Reenee Wegrzyn, a former scientist with DARPA, as the inaugural director of ARPA-H. Her specialties are synthetic biology, genetic engineering and data collection through biosurveillance. ARPA-H will be a swarming hive for Transhumanist scientists and projects. It will also likely heavily fund and promote mRNA “vaccines”- particularly for cancer. 

The direct DARPA connection to HARPA underscores that the agenda behind this coming agency dates back to the failed Bio-Surveillance project of DARPA’s Total Information Awareness program (TIA), which was launched after the events of September 11, 2001.  It’s all under the auspice of detecting “normal” disease outbreaks, and harvesting data through the mass use of wearable or handheld technology, which is currently being used by the military for “returning to work safely,” from COVID. These Darpa programs were shut down due to controversy that they’d be used to profile domestic dissidents and eliminate privacy, something the WEF also states we will no longer have, but we’ll be happy about.

“Darpa’s past total surveillance dragnet is coming back to life under a supposedly separate health-focused agency…”  Source

To make this all more palatable to the public, they’ve merely distanced themselves from the Department of Defense (DOD), and have become privatized, however the military is still heavily involved behind the scenes. Go here for how FB, Google, Silicon Valley, Amazon, Palantir, and politics are all involved.

The CDC, HHS, and FDA, all of which are government health agencies, are all a disgrace and have been caught red-handed withholding and skewing data, abandoning science, lying, paying the media, and have finally been exposed for the corrupt, captured agencies they have always been. And while the CDC has announced plans to revamp the agency, this move is for all the wrong reasons.  According to an article the U.S. is on course to become a ‘digital dictatorship’ under a proposed biomedical research agency.

The signs have been on the wall for some time regarding this new agency. The mishandling of the COVID debacle is being used to further a deeper, darker agenda which includes merging national health security with public health, a frightening concept that spells doom for medical freedom. Taking a research agency and modeling it after a military agency should send shivers down all of our spines.

Some state NIH is too “conservative” to support the initiative, and that ARPA-H will likely hire program managers on short-term contracts who will solicit research ideas and fund fast-paced, high-risk projects meant to accelerate the development of medical treatments almost immediately.

As it is, medical treatments have already been approved without proper oversight, with severe conflicts of interest, and far too quickly – bypassing testing that would have revealed glaring problems with efficacy and safety, among other issues.

Imagine what this new agency could do.

US Health Secretary Zavier Becerra states ARPA-H will be physically separate. “We need to make sure it’s not anchored or tethered to doing things an older way,” Becerra said.

Is this code for even less accountability and oversight as well as being hidden away from prying eyes?

While Congress gave $1 BILLION this year to ARPA-H, Biden is asking for $5 billion for ARPA-H in 2023.  Biden has also requested $62.5 BILLION to prepare the US for future pandemics and biological threats.

And speaking of Federal funding, we learn that $450 BILLION has been stolen from the U.S. COVID Economic Relief Program, and as outrageous as this fact is, more than three TRILLION has disappeared between March 2021 and Jan. 2022.  Together, the Trump and Biden Administrations approved a minimum of $4,100,000,000,000 in COVID-19 relief funding, of which $3.21 trillion has already been spent and is not retrievable. Please see the link for a breakdown of where your tax dollars actually went.  You will be surprised.  15,000 contracts received millions including Pfizer and Merck – COVID injection manufacturers.

Important excerpts:

Clearly, the mind-boggling amount of taxpayer dollars, and the numbers of federal agencies and millions of awards and recipients involved, accounts for the government’s unlimited ability to propagandize and saturate every segment of American society with the ongoing “official” COVID-19 narrative, every hour of every day, week, month, and year.  

It is now known that the federal government made secret direct payments and loans to nearly all major corporate media outlets at a cost of $1 billion to the taxpayer. In return, these media outlets pushed only the government narrative that the COVID-19 vaccine was “safe and effective,” while censoring any negative narratives on the dangers and ineffectiveness of the vaccine.

We also know today that physicians in the United States have received financial “incentives” from the federal government if they are willing to give the COVID-19 “vaccine” and booster shots. Forty-dollars is given to a compliant physician for every COVID-19 jab and booster he administers.[9] This means $120 for every patient that receives three injections. 

  • Primary care doctors have 1,200-2,500 regular patients
  • Using 1,800 patients, doctors stood to make about $216K in extra income if they got their patients to get 3 COVID shots.
As the author astutely states: Money talks, walks, and buys SILENCE even in matters of life and death.

Another contentious point about the creation of a “physically” separate government agency in charge of “risky” research is the fact the NIH already keeps taxpayers in the dark regarding how their money is being spent. Only through FOIA requests have we learned that Fauci is the highest paid U.S. government employee. The agency is not complying with open records law and most of the information they give is highly redacted.  And now – they are adding an even more secretive agency.

It appears that millions are being made not only directly from the Federal government, but from other shady foreign business dealings involving none other than Hunter Biden, the current president’s son, through Metabiota (also working with CIA-front In-Q-Tel, funded by the DOD, NIH, Gates Foundation, Google, and National Geographic Society), Peter Dansak’s EcoHealth Alliance, (the group Fauci used to funnel money to the Wuhan Lab – circumventing a moratorium on “gain of function” research), and the Wuhan Laboratory of Virology. This triad was performing research on infectious diseases derived from Chinese bats. It recently came out that the U.S. has funded  biolabs in the Ukraine and all the dots are finally making sense, but is of course explicitly denied by corrupt government officials.

It’s not shocking to discover that the new FDA chief, who has made millions as a Big Pharma consultant, has made fighting “misinformation” his top priority, or that the Feds have given tech companies until May 2, 2022 to “turn over COVID misinformation.”  Biden first revealed details of the plan during his State of the Union address:

“In addition to demanding misinformation data from the tech platforms, the surgeon general called on healthcare providers and the public to submit information about how COVID-19 misinformation has negatively influenced patients and communities.

“‘We’re asking anyone with relevant insights — from original research and data sets to personal stories that speak to the role of misinformation in public health — to share them with us,’” Murthy said.”

The government is already telling privately owned companies what to do – particularly with regard to what they call ‘misinformation’, defined as ‘information that is false, inaccurate, or misleading according to the best available evidence.’ 

In case you missed it, Big Tech has already been censoring and shutting down accounts that disagree with what the government is peddling, which includes their own infective treatments and injections they erroneously call “vaccines.”

 

 

Our own government is guilty of ‘misinformation’ but has gotten away with it because they hold the power. They have lied about the origins of COVID, the effectiveness of masks, testing, actual case counts of COVID, that there are cheap, effective treatments, the true cause of COVID death, and on the effectiveness and safety of the COVID injection, which they own half the patent on.

While the U.S. General states that, “health misinformation is an urgent threat to public health. It can cause confusion, sow mistrust, and undermine public health efforts, including our ongoing work to end the COVID-19 pandemic,” they in fact are the ones repeatedly sowing misinformation and by keeping life-saving treatment from sick people so they can push their own lucrative treatments and injections.

This same Cabal has ruled Lyme-land for 40 years.

Category:

Activism, Viruses

COVID Shots & Children: 17,500% Increase in Heart Disease & The Real Reason They Want to Give Jabs to Kids

**UPDATE April, 6, 2022**

According to a FOIA request, the CDC can not provide a single confirmed COVID death in a child younger than 16.  Injecting children with this experimental gene therapy, who rarely get COVID or transmit it, have more than a 99.9% chance of surviving, and rarely get reinfected is the height of insanity.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/17500-increase-in-heart-disease-in-children-following-covid-19-vaccines-this-is-not-rare/

17,500% Increase in Heart Disease in Children Following COVID-19 Vaccines – This is NOT Rare!

Some of the tragic stories of children’s lives destroyed following COVID-19 vaccines that we have covered here on Health Impact News.

April 2, 2022

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The number of injuries and deaths recorded in the U.S. Government’s database of Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccines has now reached 1.2 million cases as of the last update on Friday, April 1st. (Source.)

By way of contrast, there are 930,952 cases of injuries and deaths following all other vaccines for the previous 30+ years before the COVID-19 vaccines were issued emergency use authorizations in December of 2020. (Source.)

When you take the monthly average of cases filed in VAERS following all vaccines for the previous 30 years (360 months – 2,586 cases per month), and compare that to the monthly average of cases recorded after COVID-19 vaccines for the past 15 months (80,384 cases per month), that is an increase of 3,008%.

Heart Disease Exploding in Children Following COVID-19 Vaccines

The CDC admits that the COVID-19 vaccines are causing heart disease in young people, but they claim these cases are “rare” and so they continue to recommend the vaccines for children, as vaccine manufacturers are now petitioning the FDA to give emergency use authorizations to start injecting children below the age of 5 with COVID-19 vaccines.

Myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis is inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly. As of March 24, 2022, VAERS has received 2,323 preliminary reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people ages 30 years and younger who received COVID-19 vaccines.

Most cases have been reported after receiving Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna, (mRNA COVID-19 vaccines) particularly in male adolescents and young adults. (Source.)

So let’s “fact check” the CDC’s claims that these cases of heart disease in young people are “rare” by using their own data.

First of all, the CDC only reports on 2 types of heart disease: myocarditis and pericarditis.

We are going to search for ALL cases of “*carditis,” and since they want to start injecting babies with these shots, we are only going to include children under the age of 18 in our search of VAERS.

That search produces 1,261 cases of heart disease in children under the age of 18 in the past 15 months since the COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorization. (Source

By way of contrast, when we conduct the exact same search for all non-COVID vaccines for this same age group for the previous 30+ years, we get a result of 172 cases. (Source.)

When you look at the monthly averages then for cases of carditis following vaccines, we see a 17,495% increase of reported cases of heart disease in children following the COVID-19 shots.

How can this be considered “rare”?

And as horrible as these statistics are, the current situation for children is actually even worse than this, because the vast majority of vaccines administered in the U.S. the previous 30+ years were primarily to children, beginning at birth with the Hep. B vaccine, while the original EUAs issued for the COVID-19 vaccines were only for people above the age of 16.

Pfizer was issued an EUA for children between the ages of 5 and 11 several months later, and Moderna is still waiting for approval to use their COVID-19 vaccines in children between the ages of 5 and 11, and both companies are still waiting for approval to start injecting infants and toddlers under the age of 5.

What will these numbers look like in the future if this genocide is not stopped, and the COVID-19 vaccines are spread to millions of more children and babies?

__________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/heart-damage-teens-after-second-pfizer-shot/

Heart Damage Found in Teens Months After Second Pfizer Shot, Study Shows

A new peer-reviewed study shows more than two-thirds of adolescents with COVID-19 vaccine-related myopericarditis had persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis, raising concerns for potential long-term effects and contradicting claims by health officials that the condition is “mild.”

A new peer-reviewed study shows more than two-thirds of adolescents with COVID-19 vaccine-related myopericarditis had persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis, raising concerns for potential long-term effects.

The findings, published March 25 in the Journal of Pediatrics, challenge the position of U.S. health agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which claim heart inflammation associated with the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines is “mild.”

Researchers at Seattle Children’s Hospital reviewed cases of patients younger than 18 years old who presented to the hospital with chest pain and an elevated serum troponin level between April 1, 2021, and Jan. 7, 2022, within one week of receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.

While 35 patients fit the criteria, 19 were excluded for various reasons. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the remaining 16 patients was performed three to eight months after they were first examined. The MRIs showed 11 had persistent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), although levels were lower than in previous months.

According to the study, “The presence of LGE is an indicator of cardiac injury and fibrosis and has been strongly associated with worse prognosis in patients with classical acute myocarditis.”

In a meta-analysis of eight studies, LGE was found to be a predictor of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiac transplant, rehospitalization, recurrent acute myocarditis and requirement for mechanical circulatory support.

Similarly, an 11-study meta-analysis found the “presence and extent of LGE to be a significant predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes.”

Researchers said that while symptoms “were transient and most patients appeared to respond to treatment,” the analysis showed a “persistence of abnormal findings.”

The results “rais[e] concerns for potential longer-term effects,” researchers wrote, adding that they plan to repeat imaging at one year after the vaccine to assess whether abnormalities have resolved.

“The paper provides more evidence that myocarditis in adolescents that result from COVID-19 vaccines is very serious,” said Dr. Madhava Setty, senior science editor for The Defender.

“All patients had significantly elevated serum troponin levels indicative of heart damage. And LGE, which is indicative of poor outcome, was present in more than two-thirds of the kids.”

The study stated, “All patients had elevated serum troponin levels (median 9.15 ng/mL, range 0.65-18.5, normal < 0.05 ng/mL).”

“These young patients had a median troponin level of 9.15 — more than 20 times greater than the levels found in people suffering heart attacks,” Setty said.

Commenting on the study, Dr. Marty Makary, surgeon and public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, tweeted “CDC has a civic duty to rigorously study the long-term effects of vaccine-induced myocarditis.”

Dr. Anish Koka, a cardiologist, told The Epoch Times the study suggests 60% to 70% of teenagers who get myocarditis from a COVID vaccine may be left with a scar on their heart.

“Certainly, children who had chest pain severe enough to merit seeking medical attention need to at least make sure they get a follow-up MRI,” Koka said, adding that the findings “should have clear implications for the discussion around vaccines, especially for high-risk male teenagers … and definitely for vaccine mandates.”

Both Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines have been linked to several forms of heart inflammation, including myocarditis and pericarditis.

Myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart, is a severe and life-shortening disease. It was virtually unknown in young people until it became a recognized side effect of mRNA COVID vaccines, especially in boys and young men.

Pericarditis is inflammation of the pericardium, a sac-like structure with two layers of tissue that surrounds the heart to hold it in place and help it work.

According to the CDC, the most at-risk group is 16- and 17-year-old males, who have reported rates of 69 per million after the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, although that number is likely underreported.

The CDC presentation also reported that in three-month follow-up evaluations, less than one-third of adolescents 12 to 17 who suffered vaccine-induced myocarditis (reported in Vaccine Safety DataLink) had fully recovered.

The 69-per-million rate the CDC uses to determine the incidence of myocarditis in 16- and 17-year-olds came from the agency’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — a U.S. government-run database that receives reports of vaccine adverse events.

One of the biggest limitations of passive surveillance systems, like VAERS, is that the system “receives reports for only a small fraction of adverse events,” according to the Department of Health and Human Services website.

A recent study from Hong Kong suggests the incidence of myo/pericarditis after two doses of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine was 37 in 100,000 (370 per million).

This incidence matches nearly exactly with findings from a study that used the Vaccine Safety DataLink system, which showed 37.7 12- to 17-year-olds per 100,000 suffered myo/pericarditis after their second vaccine dose.

This indicates an incidence rate that is almost six times higher than the 69-per-million rate reported by the CDC.

In a preprint study from Kaiser Permanente, the incidence of myocarditis in 18- to 24-year-old males post-vaccination was even higher — at 537 per million, or 7.7 times higher than the statistics reported by the CDC.

No such thing as ‘mild’ heart damage

A paper published Jan. 14 in Circulation summarized the clinical course of 139 young patients between the ages of 12 and 20 who were hospitalized for myocarditis following COVID vaccination.

Of those patients, 19% were taken into intensive care, two required infusions of potent intravenous drugs used to raise critically low blood pressure and every patient had an elevated troponin level.

Troponin is an enzyme specific to cardiac myocytes. Levels above 0.4 ng/ml are strongly suggestive of heart damage.

The paper concluded, “Most cases of suspected COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis occurring in persons <21 years have a mild clinical course with rapid resolution of symptoms.”

“We suppose [a ‘mild clinical course] refers to the 81% who did not go to the ICU or the fact that none died or required ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, a desperate means to keep the body oxygenated when a patient’s heart or lungs have completely failed),” wrote Setty and Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D., a theoretical physicist, in an article critiquing the Circulation paper.

“When does a ‘mild clinical course’ require hospitalization for a two-day median length of stay?” they asked. “How does anyone know if symptoms rapidly resolve?”

“We don’t know what it will do to young boys in the long term, especially since every patient had some damage to their heart as evidenced by significantly abnormal troponin levels,” Setty and Mitteldorf wrote. “And we don’t fully understand the mechanism by which the vaccines cause myocarditis.”

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, vaccines, Viruses

The Chilling Reason They Won’t Declare the Pandemic Over? Creation of the Pandemic Treaty

http://  Approx. 9 Min

World Economic Forum: Davos, Switzerland

Blatant Hypocrisy Displayed in Real-Time

The peons are warned that there will be some pain involved in following the plan set forward by the elites for our own good.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-chilling-reason-they-wont-declare-the-pandemic-over

The Chilling Reason They Won’t Declare the Pandemic Over?

By Joseph Mercola
Updated: March 31, 2022

Over the past two years, in the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists have justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment. Now, the WHO wants to make its pandemic leadership permanent, and to extend it into the health care systems of every nation.

The negotiations for this treaty began March 3, 2022.(1) As reported by The Pulse (video above):

“Coming off the back of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization is proposing a new pandemic treaty they’re hoping will be accepted by enough member countries to become a reality by 2024.”

The pandemic treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere.

Treaty Threatens National Sovereignty

As noted by The Pulse, “there are a number of things in the treaty that the people of the world need to consider before going down this path.” In the featured video, The Pulse’s Joe Martino interviews Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, a member of the steering committee of the World Council for Health, who points out that the treaty gives the WHO:

“… an inordinate amount of power to make decisions in sovereign countries as to how people live and how they deal with pandemics, from lockdowns to mandates over treatment.”

In short, it would create a one-size-fits-all approach to disease, without regard for all the varying situations found in individual countries, and this is something we already know doesn’t work. The treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere.

At the same time, it would cost each member country millions of dollars to participate in this process. As explained by Mohamed, the treaty will need to go through a voting process at the World Health Assembly in 2023. They need a majority for it to pass and, if passed, all member countries will be bound by it.

The Treaty Is ‘Invalid and Unlawful’

Another concern raised by Mohamed is that many countries don’t even know about this treaty as of yet, and it’s possible that the WHO might try to push for earlier implementation than 2024 — all without public participation or input. “It is undemocratic, it is unconstitutional and therefore it makes the treaty invalid and unlawful,” she says.

She also highlights the WHO’s many health policy failures, which are “intrinsically linked to conflicts of interest.” In an open letter on the WHO’s pandemic treaty, the World Council for Health writes, in part: (2)  (See link for article)

____________________

**UPDATE**

There’s an important link with the accepted narrative about”climate change” and the current COVID debacle.  If you are unaware of this connection, please take the time to go down a dark rabbit-hole that connects the dots. This news story reports on the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) ESG score, (environment, social, and corporate governance) which is similar to a credit score and is centered around sustainability & ethics.  Currently given only to corporations, it isn’t a stretch to imagine this extended to individuals. Like everything else, the system is subjective to whomever decides what “ethical, diverse, and sustainable” is.  The scores can change on a whim. Companies are changing slogans, censoring content, firing controversial people, and modifying behavior to ingratiate themselves to those in power. ESG score determines how much and how easy it is for a company to secure funds & investments.

Who has the highest scores?
Microsoft, founded by Bill Gates, and Disney.

This system is already being used in China and is politically corrupted.

And while comedic in nature, this video, is an accurate piece of investigative journalism, which reveals words about “The Great Reset” right out of the horse’s mouth.  It gives details of Klaus Schwab, chairman of the WEF, and describes the climate fear-mongering, as well as WEF’s partnership with investment firm BlackRock, which has infiltrated the government and is colluding in corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population.  Also featured are the harrowing words of Dr. Yuval Noah Harari, top adviser to Schwab and the WEF.  A noted transhumanist, he states that soon corporations and governments will be able to “systematically hack all the people.”  He calls this “intelligent design” not created by “some God above the clouds,” but “our intelligent design,” and the “intelligent design of our Clouds, the IBM Cloud, the Microsoft Cloud, these are the new driving forces of evolution.”

Lastly, Harari has given harrowing quotes:

“Today we have the technology to hack human beings on a massive scale.”

“In this time of crisis you have to follow science.”

“It’s often said you should never allow a good crisis to go to waste.”

“Surveillance…..people could look back in 100 years and identify the coronavirus epidemic as the moment when a new regime of surveillance took over, especially surveillance under the skin.”

Before you chalk this up to a “conspiracy” theory that could never happen, please see this article on Charles Lieber, aka the NanoTech King, involved in the Thousand Talent Plan who was accused of being a spy for the Chinese Community Party (CCP) and was arrested for 6 counts of tax evasion. The Biden DOJ scrapped the entire Trump-China initiative, which was to combat China’s campaign to steal US secrets, technology, and research, stating it didn’t embody “the right approach,” and scrubbed it entirely from the DOJ website. 

  • A 2018 report discovered 80% of all economic espionage prosecutions brought by the DOJ alleged conduct that benefits the Chinese state
  • 60% of all trade secret theft cases have a nexus to China
  • FBI Director Christopher Wray stated: “the greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality, is the counterintelligence and economic espionage threat from China”
  • this past March, a New Jersey man was convicted for his participation in a conspiracy to fraudulently obtain US visas for Chinese government employees. He was also engaged in recruiting US scientists, academics, engineers, and other experts to work in China

Lieber is the mastermind behind:

  • 66+ nanotech-related patents, including cyborg heart tissue
  • DOD funded injectable nanoscale wires and/or injectable devices that will be able to connect the body to 5G and the Internet of Things (IoT)
  • brain implant nanotechnology that paved the way for Elon Musk’s Neuralink/Neurolace which has already been implanted into the brain of a 9-year old monkey allowing him to play a video game by “simply thinking about moving his hands. Neuralink sounds an awful lot like Merge in the frightening fictional book, “The Utopia Experiment”
  • Elon Musk states this is a key step in merging human consciousness with AI
  • Musk stated in 2020 that Neuralink could be experimented “in a human as soon as this year”.  Neuralink involves drilling a hole into the skull and putting flexible threads of electrodes inserted through brain tissue.  See pic:
  • Of course similarly to ‘vaccines,’ and despite the consequences, it’s all for the “greater good,” and under the pretext of medicine, but some are willing to be honest and state the truth: it’s to connect you to the IoT & “smart”machines, and for reading a person’s mind, and to enable surveillance under the skin
  • MuckRock, a non-profit collaborative news site, suspects unethical or illegal conduct within UPenn neuroscience-related research projects, and also lists a link titled “Implantable Graphene Nanotechnology Investigational Device Exemption Approval Documents;” however, the page is now 404’d
    • Three independent scientific studies show Graphene nanoparticles make up 98-99.5% of the COVID shots
    • It’s also in masks & PCR swabs
    • Recent testing has now confirmed it’s in precipitation, along with an already long list of toxins like aluminum
  • Graphene is superconductive, highly integrative with neurons in the brain using radio-frequencies and can map, transmit, and receive instructions remotely. It also causes blood clotting and magnetism
  • Nonprofit advocacy group Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine (PCRM), details that people have come forward, claiming their brains have been messed with, without their consent

A neuro-techno future is underway, and it is reconceptualizing our human rights laws and prompting the need for new ones.  Source

While people are clamoring for Metaverse, there are those who want to trace and store everything, which is not only an invasion of privacy, but can be used against you.  This technology can also be hacked, allowing a third party access.

SUMMARY of the Pandemic Treaty article:

  • If passed, there’s no accountability due to diplomatic immunity if people are harmed by WHO policies
  • While focused on pandemics, there’s serious concerns it would be expanded to cover all areas of health turning the WHO into a global health dictatorship
  • The WHO recently removed the specificity of “mass casualties” from the definition of a pandemic which means a pandemic can be about any disease that occurs in multiple countries – or anything the WHO wants to label a pandemic
  • The WHO also recently changed the definition of “herd immunity” to only include “vaccines”, not natural immunity – rewriting hundreds of years of scientific understanding
  • WHO hopes to mandate “vaccine” passports and COVID shots worldwide and is already working on the creation of a global “vaccine” passport/digital identity program
  • The treaty would give the WHO power to censor health information globally – even more censorship than is currently being seen
  • “Build Back Better” is a slogan of The Great Reset and is intended to shift the financial system over to an all-digital centrally controlled currency system tied to a “vaccine” passport and/or digital identity system
  • Using this system, desired behaviors can be incentivized while undesired behaviors can be punished – including access to your own finances
  • While the world was distracted by Will Smith, the internal elite met at the World Government Summit in Dubai where WEF head Klaus Schwab and ilk spoke of a “longer-term narrative” to make the world “more resilient, more inclusive, and more sustainable“. Pippa Malgren, economist at the WGS states the world financial system is about to switch accounting systems to digital money (cashless)- not decentralized cryptos, but centralized central bank digital currency. She states we will need a digital constitution of human rights. Simply put, central banks will have complete control over your money and will be able to program it so that it can only be spent on certain things or in certain places. Posted two years ago, human-implantable cryptocurrency systemusing “quantum-dot tattoos” have been created by MIT & Rice University researchers after being approached by Bill Gates.  The patent states that “conditions set by the cryptocurrency system” can be awarded cryptocurrency to the user. In other words, if you are a good boy or girl you get points.  A 2019 MIT study funded by the Gates Foundation describes how “near-infrared quantum dots” can be implanted under the skin along with a “vaccine” to encode information for “decentralized data storage and bio-sensing.”  https://sci-hub.tw/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay7162
  • Interesting side-note to the Rock/Smith distraction is the fact that the 2022 Oscars were sponsored by Pfizer, the company that just happens to have a new Alopecia drug coming out very soon, which I’m sure is purely coincidental. Seems everything today is “brought to you by Pfizer.”
    • Schwab’s “the 4th Industrial Revolution,” is the “digital panopticon of the future, where digital surveillance is omnipresent and humanity uses digital technology to alter our lives. Often associated with terms like the Internet of Things, the Internet of Bodies, the Internet of Humans, and the Internet of Senses, this world will be powered by5G and 6G technology.”  (Please note many believe this technology is dangerous to the human body)
    • Many spoke, including WHO Director Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus and Fred Kempe, president and CEO of the Athlantic Council, anchor for CNN, and former advisor to former president George W. Bush.
    • The WGS spent considerable time discussing theUnited Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which form the core of the Agenda 2030, itself part of The Great Reset agenda, as well as Blockchain, AI, 6G, and Human Meta-Cities, a rebranding of the so-called Smart Cities.
    • The truly frightening discussion was titled: The Invisible Government: Eliminating Bureaucracy Through Technology: “What goes unsaid in the panel description is that making the government “invisible” will actually lead to a world of no accountability for government and politicians. In reality, the Technocrats imagine a world where the tyrannical technological systems are invisible and the average person has zero recourse for preventing exclusion or punishment based on their social credit score.”
Hopefully it is plainly and abundantly clear what the desired goal of the Technocrats is, and that COVID merely opened the door to Pandora’s Box
The WHO pandemic treaty must be opposed by all or we will find ourselves living in “1984” with our personal and medical freedoms completely gone.

Sources and References

___________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Explosive Report Provides New Details on Fauci’s Lab-Leak Cover-Up

http://  (Approx. 10 Min)

April 4, 2022

Vanity Fair’s Katherine Eban answers Ryan Grim and Robby Soave’s questions about her new lab leak reporting which is detailed in the article below.

https://www.theblaze.com/news/explosive-report-provides-new-details-on-fauci-s-lab-leak-cover-

Explosive report provides new details on Fauci’s lab-leak cover-up

Chris Pandolfo

April 1, 2022

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the U.S. government’s top expert on COVID-19, was privately urged by former CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield to vigorously investigate both the lab-leak and natural origins theories of virus in early 2020, only to then exclude Redfield from discussions with world-renowned virologists and wage a PR campaign denouncing the lab-leak theory as a conspiracy theory, according to an investigative report.

The explosive report from Vanity Fair reveals new details of how Fauci and former National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Francis Collins strongly pushed back against scientists who raised legitimate questions about the origins of the virus — questions that could implicate the NIH’s financial support for the non-governmental group EcoHealth Alliance and risky bat virus research in China.

By analyzing more than 100,000 internal EcoHealth documents, interviewing five former staff members, and speaking with 33 other sources, Vanity Fair’s Katherine Eban uncovered how EcoHealth Alliance operated in a world of “murky grant agreements, flimsy oversight, and the pursuit of government funds for scientific advancement, in part by pitching research of steeply escalating risk.”

Her report delves deep inside EcoHealth Alliance, showing how the group’s president, Peter Daszak, spent years wooing Fauci — at times literally at D.C. cocktail parties — to win federal support for gain-of-function studies at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the Chinese lab central to the lab-leak hypothesis of COVID-19’s origins. Fauci, in turn, worked with Daszak, Collins, and other top virologists to lead a well-documented campaign discrediting the lab-leak theory, all the while never being completely transparent about their potential conflicts of interest should the theory prove true.  (See link for article)

_________________

SUMMARY:

  • EcoHealth Alliance received a $3.7 million federal grant in 2014 to study a deadly new coronavirus from wild bats in China
  • EcoHealth partnered with the Wuhan Institute for Virology and gave them $600,000 in federal funds to collect virus samples from bats and analyze them
  • The 2020 COVID ‘pandemic’ was traced to Wuhan, China – where the lab is located
  • Early analysis suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 virus was 96.2% similar to a previously discovered bat coronavirus, and top virologists raised the possibility it was laboratory-engineered
  • Former CDC director, Dr. Robert Redfield, asked whether EcoHealth paid for gain-of-function (making viruses more deadly and infectious) research in Wuhan & whether Chinese scientists engineered the virus before it escaped the lab
  • Redfield was aware of a 2015 gain-of-function study funded by EcoHealth Alliance, carried out in Dr. Ralph Baric’s lab in the University of North Carolina’s lab, and published by a Wuhan lab scientist Dr. Zhengli Shi
    • The study showed it was possible to manipulate a SARS-like bat coronavirus so that it would infect human cells
  • Redfield brought his concerns to Fauci, the UK Wellcome Trust, and WHO
  • A FOIA request revealed Fauci emailed NIAID principal deputy director a copy of the 2015 study and told him he needed to speak to him, to keep his phone on, and that he would have tasks that must be done.
    • The NIAID director organized a secret conference call “in total confidence” with 11 top international virologists but omitted Redfield, the very person in charge of the leading the government’s response to the ‘pandemic’, who initially brought up the issue
    • Prior to the call some of the virologists had noted features of SARS-CoV-2 “(potentially) look engineered.”
    • After the call, these same virologists would condemn the lab-leak hypothesis and those who believed in it and published “The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2,” in the journal Nature Medicine on March 17. Mainstream media seized on the statement, inaccurately referring to it as a “study” that purportedly debunked the lab-leak theory
  • Redfield states: “They made a decision, almost a P.R. decision, that they were going to push one point of view only” he told Vanity Fair. “They argued they did it in defense of science, but it was antithetical to science.”
  • Then, there was Peter Daszak’s own campaign to organize scientists to denounce the lab-leak theory as a “conspiracy” and his effusive praise for Fauci’s public comments asserting the same.
  • Fauci and Collins continue to play defense for Daszak and EcoHealth Alliance, in public and in private.
  • American scientist, Dr. Jesse Bloom discovered Chinese researchers appeared to have deleted data from a NIH virus sample database on early genomic sequences for COVID
  • When Bloom took this info to Fauci to review, he learned the NIH itself had deleted the data, at the request of Chinese researchers at the Wuhan institute
  • Collins organized a Zoom meeting to discuss all of this, but the meeting was “extremely contentious” and Bloom was told it would be unethical to analyze the deleted viral sequences since Chinese scientists wanted them deleted
  • Instead of giving scientific points to counter Bloom’s points, a shouting match ensued and one of the virologists stated he “needed security outside his house, and my preprint would fuel conspiratorial notions that China was hiding data and thereby lead to more criticism of scientists such as himself.” 
  • The icing on the cake came when a virologist who is a screener at the preprint server offered to delete Bloom’s preprint or revise it “in a way that would leave no record that this had been done”
  • Bloom responded that it would not be appropriate to secretly delete or alter the paper “given the contentious nature of the meeting.”
  • A NIH representative quibbles with the word “delete” and insists that they in fact “suppressed” the genetic sequences of the virus, kind of like when Walensky states they are “pivoting” language on what it means to be fully vaxxed. The NIH did not respond to congressional oversight requests or The Epoch Times FOIA request.  Only after The Epic Times sued to enforce its request did the institute release the redacted documents. Source
  • “Discovering the origin of COVID-19 is vital to ensuring that no pandemic like it ever happens again. Yet, shortly after it began, the NIH bowed to the wishes of researchers in Wuhan to terminate public access to genetic sequences that could shed light on how it began,” said Jason Foster, founder and president of The Epic Times, in a statement when releasing the FOIA documents.

But that is the point, isn’t it?  The ‘powers that be’ have ZERO desire to ensure another pandemic like COVID ever happens again.  These pandemics are huge cash cows and give them unlimited power and control.

Important quote:

This account is disturbing. At the very least, it shows how Fauci, Collins, and the others strongly pushed back against any criticism of their preferred COVID-19 origins narrative, even dismissing legitimate questions raised by scientists earnestly seeking the truth. There is no scientific reason for silencing that debate. But as the NIH’s ties to EcoHealth Alliance and the potential conflicts of interest therein demonstrate, there were plenty of political reasons for doing so.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Viruses

Fauci Told Our Government to Tell People “Don’t Do Autopsies On COVID Patients”

https://rumble.com/vxwz04-dr.-ryan-cole-on-dead-covid-patients-we-were-told-by-fauci-do-not-do-autopsy Video Here (Approx. 9 Min)

Fauci: “Don’t Do Autopsies”

March 20, 2022

“You can not find that for which you do not look.” ~ Dr. Ryan Cole

Dr. Cole said autopsies are finally starting to be done and that he has personally seen a nine-year-old as well as a healthy 22 year old wrestler both die after the COVID shots.

Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Robert Malone are tired of seeing young children die or suffer permanent damage from a “vaccine” that “does not work for a virus that is no longer here and most of them have already recovered.” Yet, the courageous medical experts, who have been smeared and maligned by big pharma, left-wing politicians, and media, continue to risk their careers to save children.

Malone, creator of the mRNA technology, warns parents of three issues:

  1. A viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells which forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins which can cause permanent, irreparable damage to critical organs including the brain and nervous system, heart and blood vessels including blood clots, the reproductive system, and the immune system.
  2. This novel mRNA technology has not been adequately tested, and a minimum of five years of testing and research should be done before risks can be understood.
  3. Reasons being given to “vaccinate” children are based upon lies.  Children represent no danger to parents or grandparents and it’s actually the opposite.  Their immunity after recovery is critical to save your family, if not the world from this disease.  They generate broad, long-lasting natural immunity which is the best answer.  There are 150 studies published on natural immunity, evidence for early outpatient treatment for COVID, more than 150 comparative studies & articles on mask ineffectiveness and harms, more than 400 studies on the failure of lockdowns and restrictions, 44 studies on “vaccine” efficacy that raise doubts on “vaccine” mandates, as well as 20 steps to end the madness by their colleague, Dr. Paul Alexander at Brownstone Institute.

https://rairfoundation.com/doctors-sound-alarm-covid-vaccines-are-killing-children-and-causing-permanent-damage-video/  Video Here

Doctors Sound Alarm: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Are Killing Children and Causing Permanent Damage (Video)

 Amy Mek
March 20, 2022

“As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.” – Dr. Robert Malone

Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the inventor of the core mRNA vaccine technology platform, and Dr. Ryan Cole, a Mayo Clinic trained Pathologist who is the CEO and Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics, are fighting to save children from the detrimental effects of the Covid vaccines.

The two medical experts were featured at four sold-out One Washington events. The event organizer is a non-profit organization that is helping equip parents, lawmakers, and activists to counter moves by the state Board of Health to add the Covid “vaccine” to the required shots for public school children.

Cancer Spreads Like Wildfire

RAIR Foundation USA had previously reported on Dr. Cole, who warned that the Covid “vaccines” are also linked to increased cancer cases.

After he spoke out about the risks of the shots, ‘numerous’ oncologists contacted him. The doctors reported they are “seeing the weirdest cancers, and cancers that we have been able to keep in check and treat, taking off like wildfire – going stage 2, stage 3, stage 4, just like that.”

https://rumble.com/vv5z8m-dr.-roger-hodkinson-discusses-heart-damage-from-mrna-injection  Video Here (Approx. 6 Min)

Pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson

Heart Damage & Blood Clotting After mRNA Injection

Article here:  https://rairfoundation.com/alert-dr-roger-hodkinson-on-heart-damage-blood-clotting-from-mrna-injection-exclusive/

These conditions are being “sloughed off” by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as “too low a frequency to be concerned about, etc.,” Dr. Roger Hodkinson observed. While the CDC and their political allies dismiss heart damage from the mRNA “vaccine,” the problem is very real and has short term, as well as long term implications.

“They’re not mild,” the pathologist emphasized, “and the frequency is substantially higher than what they’re claiming as all kinds of data is coming out.”

Just this week, RAIR Foundation USA reported on two young boys found dead with myocarditis within a week of taking the shot.

“Jessica Rose in Israel, for example, is one of the prime statisticians that’s drawing attention to [the weak reporting systems],” Dr. Hodkinson said. “This is a very serious problem,” he continued. Dr. Hodkinson mentioned the soccer players and pilots who are dying from heart damage after taking the mRNA injections.

And this article by Dr. Clare Craig, a diagnostic pathologist and Co-Chair of HART shows that heart deaths in children and young people increase after each COVID shot dose, according to UK ONS data, despite their conclusion that there isn’t an association between the shots and increased death.

  • The ONS agreed in court that there was a statistically significant increase in registered deaths of 15-19 year old males since May 2021, yet it provided no breakdown by age or sex in this study. Why not?
  • What is the reason for the 12 week arbitrary cut-off?
  • Despite the authors declaring no conflicts of interests, one of the authors, Kamlesh Khunti, a member of SAGE, has previously declared that he “acted as a consultant, speaker or received grants for investigator-initiated studies for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie AG/Menarini Group, Janssen and Napp”. Another author, Amitava Banerjee, has written about the importance of declaring conflicts of interest but failed to declare, on this paper, that his research is funded by AstraZeneca. Did these conflict create a bias in how this data was presented?
  • Vaccine induced spike protein appears to have a strong relationship with cardiac death which worsens with each dose:
    • 16% of deaths being cardiac within 12 weeks of a first dose
    • 19% within 12 weeks of a second dose
    • 27% within 12 weeks of a third dose
There is a marked signal here of an increase in cardiac deaths due to vaccination that must not be ignored.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses