Sixteen Top Scientists Torch Fauci In Scathing Medical Journal Article
Fauci is running out of allies
Now, a group of scientists that includes Jacques van Helden of Aix-Marseille University in France, Richard Ebright of Rutgers University, and 14 others have published a new article in The Lancet calling out Fauci and his apologists’ unscientific Fake News “which claimed overwhelming support for the hypothesis that the novel coronavirus causing the COVID-19 pandemic originated in wildlife.”
“The authors associated any alternative view with conspiracy theories by stating: ‘We stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin.’” these scientists wrote. “The statement has imparted a silencing effect on the wider scientific debate, including among science journalists.”
(See link for article)
Fauci Admits Natural Immunity After Recovery From COVID Gives a “Considerable Degree of Immunity”
The real question is, why such a forceful push for the jab if natural immunity works so well?
Head vaccine pusher Dr. Anthony Fauci appeared on CNN’s “State of the Union” with Jake Tapper on Sunday and did something shocking, he actually admitted people who get infected with COVID and recover have a “considerable degree of immunity.”
In a rare moment of journalism for Tapper, he asked Fauci why Biden’s vaxx mandate, “has to apply to people that have had COVID? Given that they have some protection already?” (See link for article)
True to form, Fauci then casts doubt on natural immunity by implying it may not be durable, and that’s why everyone, regardless of health status or previous infection needs a jab in the arm with a product he has a vested interest in.
It is a lie that these injections, which aren’t even vaccines, are “safe and effective“. Similarly with Lyme/MSIDS, corrupt public health ‘authorities’, and Big Pharma have been busy manipulating data to derive their predetermined outcome that bolsters their accepted narrative that our only salvation is in the jab.
Fauci lies further by stating that those who have recovered from COVID increase their protection by getting the jab. In fact, reality paints a far starker picture.
Those who get the jab after infection often end up with severe COVID requiring hospitalization, and some even die.
The article points out that a recent study out of Israel showed:
- recovered patients are 13 times less likely to be infected than those who have Pfizer jabs
- those who were double jabbed were 5.96 times more likely to be infected and 7.13 times more likely to experience symptoms than those with natural immunity after recovery