https://www.lymedisease.org/bauer-gestational-icd11-tbdwg/?

To TBDWG: Pay attention to gestational Lyme and new ICD-11 codes

Kristina Bauer gave the following public comments at the July 19 meeting of the federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group.

July 21. 2022

I’m Kristina Bauer, Executive Director of Texas Lyme Alliance,  mom of four gestational Lyme kids. This is my fourth opportunity to address Congress and provide public comments to the TBDWG, thank you for giving patients and advocates a voice!

I have been advocating for gestational and pediatric Lyme over five years, yet still don’t see treatment guidelines updated to avoid this health risk. I went 32 years misdiagnosed as autoimmune diseases and hearing, “I don’t know how to help you.”

My family is finally in remission after 10 years of treating by using immune therapies and integrative medicine, spending too much money. I also serve on the board of Mothers Against Lyme, and am the Texas state captain for Center for Lyme Action.

* The Affordable Care Act established that 90 days of antibiotic treatments, repeated as necessary, are essential health benefits for cases of persistent and recurring Lyme infection.

* Dr Bruce Patterson’s work from Incelldx on chronic inflammation has inferred Lyme persists, but others may need treatment for high inflammation. Separating these two can help patients identify what is going on and reduce symptoms to improve quality of life.

* I invite the listeners to view my YouTube channel at Kristina Bauer that contains interviews regarding how PTLDS is being expressly used to deny treatment for ongoing infection.

* Human rights violations have been documented to include denying the right to the highest attainable standard of health, personal security, right to life and the protections against torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment.

* Doctors who take an oath but don’t understand Lyme, do nothing for patients, therefore in fact do harm. Improving education to all medical providers would help improve a patient’s quality of life.

ICD-11 Diagnostic Codes

The World Health Organization’s ICD-11 now recognizes a significant number of Lyme complications which can become chronic, cause severe disability, and in some cases, result in death.

The new codes now include: 1C1G.10 Lyme Neuroborreliosis. 1C1G.11 Lyme Carditis. 1C1G.12 Ophthalmic Lyme borreliosis. 1C1G.1Y Other specified disseminated Lyme borreliosis. 1C1GY Other specified Lyme borreliosis. 6D85.Y Dementia due to Lyme Disease. 8A45.0Y Central Nervous System demyelination due to Lyme borreliosis and WHO recommended that “KA6Y Other specified infections of the fetus or newborn” be coordinated with “XN13C Borrelia Burgdorferi” to represent congenital Lyme.

Thank you to all TBDWG members. To all the patients, things ARE getting better, keep your chin up and never give up!

View a recording of Kristina’s comments here:

Kristina Bauer can be contacted via her website, TXLymeAlliance.org.

________________

**Comment**

Moms like Kristina are true, unrecognized heroes.  Having a bevvy full of infected kids, while being infected yourself is a underappreciated challenge.  Rock on!

That said, here’s a few points for consideration:

  1. The TBDWG does NOT give patients a voice – unless you consider ONE patient advocate enough of a voice.  As knowledgeable as LDA’s Pat Smith is, one voice hardly registers against a literal Cabal biased against the severity and persistence of Lyme/MSIDS.
  2. Being misdiagnosed for 32 years is unacceptable but nothing is changing in Lyme-land and the exact same thing is happening to thousands of others daily.
  3. This brave mom discusses having FOUR children with gestational Lyme, yet the CDC still says this is rare.  As Tuttle asks, how can they know when they aren’t counting?
  4. Doctors saying “I don’t know how to help you” is also unacceptable.  They are either too afraid to treat due to the politicization of the disease OR are completely ignorant due to public health ‘authorities’ who are  propagating a false narrative that has been regurgitated by mainstream medicine, including medical professional organizations (they come after doctors for thinking for themselves) and medical schools (which are in bed with Big Pharma) – all of which are slowly turning into a monopolized business that is completely destroying health care.
  5. Working with the corrupt WHO is unfruitful at best and harmful at worst.  70% of its funding comes from Big Pharma and the rest comes from the Gates Foundation and China.  Hello?  A WHO whistleblower has stated the WHO is the “tip of the spear for world tyranny.”  Why do we continue to craw in bed with the enemy?  If we haven’t learned from 40 years of stagnation and lies, we never will.
  6. The Affordable Care Act (aka: ACA, Obamacare, PPACA) is not affordable.  Further, this monopoly has caused untold damage.  Again, why would you continue to trust the very people and agencies behind all the corruption?  It defies all sound logic and reason.  Untold thousands have died and continue to die, due to ACA interference with COVID treatment. I can only imagine the suffering due to the standard Lyme guidelines in place for over 40 years.
  7. Things are NOT getting better.  There is a delusion in the land and people have stopped thinking critically.  We need to quit aligning ourselves with corrupt bureaucrats who care more about their position, power, and money than patients. Any forward progress has been solely due to independent researchers/doctors who conduct their own research with their own funds and/or share with the world what they have learned in their clinical experience.  That’s it.  If we were smart, we would fund these individuals and organizations.  The government is beyond help.  Time to move on and get real answers for patients. “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results.”  Truer words were never spoken and never more applicable than in Lyme-land.
  8. Always keep your chin up and never give up.  But we also must get wiser and realize what is working and what is not, and stop enabling corrupt organizations to continue to do what they’ve gotten away with for decades.

https://jennifermargulis.substack.com/p/we-should-be-doing-autopsies-on-every

“We Should be Doing Autopsies on Every Single One”

A neurologist weighs in on the spate of sudden adult deaths

Robert Lowry, M.D., is a concussion and musculoskeletal expert who has been practicing medicine for over 25 years. When I spoke with him by phone last week, Lowry told me he’s seen an upsurge in young patients—adults under 40—coming to him with neurological problems.

These problems, he said, include everything from severe headaches to Bell’s palsy (facial paralysis) to strokes.

In every case he has seen, Lowry said, his patient was vaccinated. For this reason, he believes these neurological issues are actually COVID-19 vaccine adverse events.

Data From Mexico

Lowry pointed me to a 2021 article in Clinical Immunology that analyzed vaccine injury data from Mexico.

The study authors found that about 1 percent of people who got the first dose of the Pfizer vaccine reported having adverse neurological events afterwards.

Less than one percent. No problem. Right?

But, Lowry argued, that number is likely underreported by a factor of 10. And, he insisted, even if it is accurate, that percentage of adverse neurological events is simply too high to justify vaccination in otherwise healthy young adults.

(See link for article)

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • If 2/3 of the population got one dose, that is 5.3 billion people.  1% of 5.3 billion equals 53 MILLION who have likely already suffered from neurological injury.
  • You can calculate your risk of dying from COVID-19 by entering your age, place of residence, and underlying health issues into an online risk calculator.
  • Since the risk of dying from COVID for young adults is less than 1%, risk of injection damage outweighs any supposed benefit.
  • Healthy people are suddenly dying (SADS) in numbers never seen before.
  • When the deaths are “unexplained” but a history of vaccination within the past 12 months, Dr. Lowry believes the cause is likely the mRNA vaccines.
  • Physicians are seeing many more severe reactions and neurological and cardiac injuries after the second dose.
  • The most likely ways include micro-clots in the brain that result in neuron necrosis; myocarditis, pericarditis and other heart damage; and vasculitis (inflammation of the blood vessels), but is compounded by immuno-sensitivity.
  • The best way to find out the cause of these cases is by doing autopsies, and Lowry believes autopsies should be done on every single one of these healthy people who died suddenly.

Please note that Fauci told the government to tell others to NOT do autopsies on COVID patients.  Doctors are asking where the autopsies are of those who died after the COVID shots. Embalmers are showing blood clots and white, fibrous structures in the “vaxxed,” and that hospitals are covering up the deaths of babies by cremating them in house.

Autopsies would also give answers in Lyme-land.

https://anh-usa.org/fda-working-to-stifle-lab-testing-options/

FDA Working to Stifle Lab Testing Options

FDA Working to Stifle Lab Testing Options

Another dangerous policy has been slipped into legislation that must pass Congress by the end of September. Action Alert!

For months now, we’ve been telling you about the dangers of mandatory product registration for supplements; one key threat is that this policy has been snuck into the reauthorization of drug user fees which must be approved by the end of September. Another bad policy has been tacked on to this must-pass legislation. It represents another attempt by the FDA to extend its power over laboratory developed tests (LDTs). This is a critical threat, as LDTs are crucial tools used in personalized medicine because labs can create custom diagnostic tests for all sorts of diseases. We cannot allow the FDA to stifle innovation in this sector and regulate these tests out of existence.

LDTs are diagnostic tests developed and performed by local labs. They are widely used—thousands of different LDTs are available—and include genetic tests, tests for rare conditions, companion diagnostics, and also diseases like COVID-19.

The LDT policy that has been snuck into PDUFA is the VALID Act. It creates a risk-based framework for the FDA to regulate LDTs in which “high-risk” LDTs would undergo premarket review, whereas LDTs determined to be “low-risk” would have less scrutiny and could qualify for exemptions to premarket review. High-risk tests are those for which an inaccurate result has a high likelihood of resulting in serious harm or death to patients or is likely to delay life-supporting treatment. The policy allows FDA to revoke pre-market exemptions if new information comes to light indicating greater risks to patients. Generally, LDTs currently being offered are grandfathered in and would not need to undergo premarket review, though they would need to adhere to the bill’s other requirements.

Premarket review for these tests is a big mistake. We saw this in stark relief during the COVID-19 pandemic. At the beginning of the pandemic, labs were held up from developing their own COVID tests because they needed to get emergency use authorization—in essence, pre-approval—to deploy their tests. This was a major missed opportunity; accurate testing is important, but the FDA prioritized red tape over getting people reasonably accurate means of testing for COVID that could have helped reduce transmission rates and hospitalizations at an earlier date.

Premarket review for LDTs will also stifle innovation in an exciting medical sector. Regulators are often suspicious of new products. The agency is also more influenced by older firms offering old technology. Protecting them can also lead to lucrative jobs after leaving government. This is the old crony capitalist conundrum.

The policy comes with a litany of other requirements for LDTs. For example, the FDA can require labeling, advertising, post market surveillance, and other things it deems necessary to detect and mitigate adverse events. Like Sen. Durbin’s mandatory product listing for supplements, the policy also requires all LDTs to register with the FDA—a requirement that will pose a significant time and personnel burden on laboratories that are already stretched thin and short-staffed.

The policy also calls for the development of a user fee program whereby testing companies pay the FDA to review their tests. This is another bad idea, as it privileges large, commercial test developers over smaller labs (non-profit labs, academic labs, etc.).

The FDA has tried before to put LDTs under its thumb. It claims to have some statutory authority over LDTs, but for decades chose not to regulate them as other diagnostic devices. LDTs have historically been regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). But in 2014, the FDA issued a draft guidance saying it would regulate LDTs as medical devices. Congress pushed back, with some legislators arguing that the FDA’s approach to LDTs was “redundant, [would] raise costs and stifle innovation, and [would] require additional taxpayer funding to the FDA.”

To us, it seemed clear that the FDA wants to take over LDTs in order to maintain the monopoly enjoyed by hospitals together with two companies: LabCorp and Quest Diagnostics. Given new authorities over LDTs, the agency would likely approve only those tests that big companies have a legal right to perform and are inclined to offer, and which insurance companies and Medicare will pay for.

LDTs are the future of medicine. People are already able to test for and spot cancers long before they manifest themselves using current methods. These tests are improving at a rapid rate. Testing can already help prevent diabetes, heart and blood vessel illness, prostate cancer, and other diseases. LDTs are not only the future of general medicine—they are also the future of individualized medicine, which is an exciting and important development. Integrative doctors use these tests to gather information that aids them in identifying the root causes of their patients’ illnesses—this information could not be gathered and analyzed otherwise.

We cannot let the FDA regulate these tests out of existence.

Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to oppose the VALID Act’s inclusion in the FDA user fee reauthorization bill. Please send your message immediately.

Go to top link to fill out a form to send to your representatives.

__________________

**Comment**

Hopefully the past few years have clearly demonstrated the problem with centralized, monopolized, government sanctioned testing under the auspice of “public health” that can and will be used to take away your freedoms and rights. This faulty testing has kept people from working, going to school, and partaking in society in general.

Lyme-land has similarly been in a testing juggernaut for 40 years – clearly showing the outcome of CDC/FDA propaganda and the underlying conflicts of interest that drives everything about public health.  Similarly to COVID, Lyme testing was created (and is still being used) that eliminated the most specific band for Lyme – due to vaccine development.  A case definition (also still being used) was created to fit this faulty, unscientific paradigm that has ruled like an Iron Curtain ever since.  Truthcures has met with the FDA in an attempt to ameliorate this but 40 years is a long time to suffer with no change.

And speaking of testing corruption: A NYC company, owned by family who donated $300K to NY governor Hochul, paid $637 MILLION to manufacture at home COVID tests without considering bids from competing manufacturers and without a contract.

The FDA has been coming after CLIA-certified labs such as IgeneX since it opened its doors.  The CDC also has maligned these smaller specialized labs from the top down.  Their website used to have a paragraph that called them “home-brewed” tests.  I actually heard a pediatrician speak at the Wisconsin state capital who used this exact phrase.  Doctors have been brain-washed that these CLIA-certified labs, which undergo far more rigorous lab requirements than Lab Corp or Quest, are quackery.  The pediatrician’s statement is indicative of this propaganda process.

Ask yourself one question: why won’t doctors in mainstream medicine utilize Galaxy or IgeneX testing? 

The answer is clear: they’ve been told not to.  Who is telling them?  The CDC/FDA and other government agencies are monopolizing medicine through the CARES Act, which in turn controls doctors like puppets.  This is why people are not being treated with ivermectin, HCQ/zinc, IV vitamin C, and other known, effective treatments and why people are resorting to the court system to save their loved ones in the nick of time.

This exact scenario plays out in Lyme-land on a daily basis.

Lyme/MSIDS, similarly to COVID, has become so politicized that doctors are afraid to treat patients. Instead, they fearfully toe the CDC/FDA line by using their sanctioned tests, treatments, and guidelines – all of which are completely and utterly worthless.

Our only hope are brave, independent doctors who have chosen to step outside the corrupt, fraudulent medical monopoly to do what they started out to do: uphold the Hippocratic oath by treating patients as they see fit according to their medical training and experience, and defying the corrupt professional organizations that are in bed with the government. These doctors are being harassed, censored, and threatened at every turn but refuse to be silenced. 

https://www.lymedisease.org/ciocca-tbdwg-devastation-lyme/

03 MAY 2022

The physical and financial devastation of unrecognized Lyme disease

Caroline Ciocca delivered the following public comment to the federal Tick-Borne Disease Working Group on April 27.

My name is Caroline and I am 25 years old. I grew up in Pennsylvania and moved to North Carolina after graduating from Temple University with a degree in Risk Management and Insurance in 2019.

I first became ill when I was 9 years old. I presented with mostly gastrointestinal and neuropsychiatric symptoms, which my pediatricians dismissed as mental illness despite the recommendation from my child psychiatrist that I be tested for Lyme.

Despite years of unexplainable symptoms that frequently debilitated me, I went undiagnosed for 15 years until the age of 23. At this time my symptoms progressed to the point that I could barely stand up without passing out and I would get to the end of the day and have no recollection of what happened, and still I was told I was just anxious.

The results of my Western Blot still left me in a gray area. The hospital called me weeks later to tell me my test was “not positive, but not exactly negative,” with no guidance on what to do about that.

Alongside Lyme disease, I have also been diagnosed with associated infections of Babesia, Bartonella, and mycoplasma. It is extremely common for patients to be infected with multiple pathogens, yet the co-infections are rarely recognized for how common and also how damaging they are.

I struggle every day with regional pain in my ankles, knees, and hips that leaves me unable to walk. Nausea to the point I lost 35 pounds in a year and dropped to 95 lbs, so underweight I stopped getting my period. I had to have my gallbladder removed. Headaches, jaw pain, eye problems, mood instability, panic attacks, and PTSD from my traumatic experiences trying to navigate the medical system for so many years.

The disease has impacted my neurological system, causing severe memory loss, brain fog, failure to recall words, confusion, executive functioning issues, and disorientation.

Financial devastation, too

Like so many other patients, I not only suffer from the physiological devastation, but also the financial devastation of this illness. I have spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on medical costs throughout the years.

I am now unable to work and had to leave my first full time job out of college. I have had more than $15,000 in out of pocket medical costs in the last MONTH alone, which is a continuation of ongoing treatment that is expected to cost $60-80k out of pocket.

There are a number of things that could have been done differently to impact my journey with this disease. The Working Group should consider the following action items:

  • Investigating what role co-infections and other commonly associated vector-borne diseases such as Bartonella play in the clinical presentation and pathogenesis
  • Funding to update education and guidelines on government-funded sites for healthcare professionals on all aspects of this illness- especially neuropsychiatric manifestations
  • Outreach to communities to stress the importance of prevention, early intervention and treatment, and potential long term health impacts – especially for at-risk demographics such as children

I am confident that had measures like this been put into place, I would not be here speaking on this topic right now. I would not have had my childhood robbed from me or had to put the last two years of my life on hold while accumulating tens of thousands of dollars in medical debt.

There is a unique opportunity here to change the lives of the hundreds of thousands of people being diagnosed every year. Thank you for your time.

Caroline can be contacted via ciocca.caroline@gmail.com.

__________________

For more:

Seriously, how many more stories must be shared before this becomes recognized for the global plague it truly is?

 

https://danielcameronmd.com/permethrin-treated-clothing-causes-hot-foot-effect-ticks/

How to protect yourself from ticks with Permethrin-treated clothing

how-to-protect-yourself-from-ticks

Several studies have found that wearing permethrin-treated clothing can reduce the risk of tick bites. But very few studies have looked at the behavior of a tick when it comes in contact with permethrin-treated clothing. Does it climb onto the insecticide-soaked textile or avoid it entirely? Does permethrin actually kill ticks?

By Dr. Cameron

As more individuals begin to venture outside with warmer weather, there are often concerns over how to protect yourself from ticks. Researchers have examined not only the effectiveness of various repellents and protective clothing but also the behavior of individuals who are more likely to encounter ticks.

Researchers in Indiana looked at the protective measures used by recreational hikers in their state. Surprisingly, they found that only 9.5% of hikers used a tick repellent, even fewer (3.4%) wore protective clothing and only 2 individuals “indicated that they took a shower post-recreation and used that activity to search for tick bites.” [1]

Ultrasonic device

Meanwhile, investigators in Australia recently studied the efficacy of ultrasonic pest repellent devices against the Australian paralysis tick, Ixodes holocyclus. “As more than 80% of the ticks were not repelled within the confined area, this level of repellency is clearly insufficient to provide adequate protection from a potential tick bite,” they conclude. [2]

Permethrin-treated clothing

Several studies have looked at Permethrin-treated clothing in repelling ticks.  Sullivan et al. recruited state and county park employees from North Carolina to wear long-lasting Permethrin-impregnated (LLPI) clothing. The authors found that the clothing “retained Permethrin and bioactivity against ticks after three months of use in real-world conditions.” [3]

A study in Rhode Island aimed to provide insight as to how to protect yourself from ticks by examining Permethrin-treated footwear. The authors found that people wearing sneakers and socks treated with Permethrin were 73.6 times less likely to have a tick bite than those wearing untreated footwear. [4]

Researchers found “people wearing sneakers and socks treated with Permethrin were 73.6 times less likely to have a tick bite than those wearing untreated footwear.”

Meanwhile, another study explored the behavior of ticks when they encounter Permethrin-treated clothing. How do ticks react? Using a model that mimicked a pant leg or the arm of a long-sleeved shirt, scientists studied the behavior and fate of ticks when exposed to Permethrin-treated clothing. [5]

“Ticks approaching a textile impregnated with a strong non-contact spatial repellent (DEET) very rarely made physical contact with the treated textile,” according to Eisen and colleagues from the Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [4]

Tick behavior when exposed to Permethrin

However, Permethrin-treated textiles did not repel ticks without contact, as seen with DEET. In fact, the majority (88%) of nymphal ticks chose to move onto Permethrin-treated textile versus DEET-treated textile.

After coming in contact with the treated clothing, the ticks dislodged through a “hot-foot” effect.

“Ticks readily walked onto a Permethrin-treated textile…. but laboratory-reared ticks became visibly agitated, displaying a hot-foot effect, and escaped contact with the Permethrin-treated textile by tumbling downwards until they dislodged themselves completely from a textile-covered assay card.”

Unfortunately, field-collected ticks were hardier than laboratory-reared ticks and able to sustain longer contact with the treated textile. The authors postulated that field-collected ticks have been exposed to highly variable temperatures and humidity conditions which may result in slower absorption of Permethrin.

“However, by 1 and 24 hours post-exposure very few ticks displayed normal movement, thus presenting minimal risk to bite, regardless of whether they were reared in the laboratory or collected in the field.”

“Contact with Permethrin-treated textiles negatively impacts the vigor and behavior of nymphal ticks for >24 hours,” according to Eisen, “with outcomes ranging from complete lack of movement to impaired movement and unwillingness of ticks displaying normal movement to ascend onto a human finger.”

One day after exposure, a majority of ticks were completely motionless. The remaining ticks were able to recover. “Ticks having recovered normal movement 1 day after exposure in our study most often ascended onto a finger when given the opportunity (and presumably also were capable of biting),” Eisen points out.

“In a real-life scenario, prolonged periods of time where ticks having fallen off a human host after contact with Permethrin-treated textile are unable to move will undoubtedly increase the risk of mortality due to desiccation or predation.”

“A scenario more difficult to address in a bioassay is when a tick makes initial contact with bare skin and subsequently approaches loose-fitting summer-weight Permethrin treated garments, such as shorts or a T-shirt,” states Eisen.

“In this case, the tick may walk underneath the treated textile and be contacted primarily from the dorsal side as the person moves and the clothing comes in and out of contact with the tick and the person’s skin.”

Permethrin is acutely toxic in high doses. The authors did not address the potential toxicity of Permethrin to humans. “Acute signs of toxicity to the central nervous system include incoordination, ataxia, hyperactivity, convulsions, and finally prostration, paralysis, and death,” according to a review by the National Research Council (US) Subcommittee to Review Permethrin Toxicity from Military Uniforms. [6]

Note: Users have been advised not to inhale Permethrin when treating clothes and not to apply Permethrin to the skin.

Article Updated: June 1, 2021

References:
  1. Anderson KR, Blekking J, Omodior O. Tick trails: the role of online recreational trail reviews in identifying risk factors and behavioral recommendations associated with tick encounters in Indiana. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):908. Published 2021 May 13. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10940-4
  2. Panthawong A, Doggett SL, Chareonviriyaphap T. The Efficacy of Ultrasonic Pest Repellent Devices against the Australian Paralysis Tick, Ixodes holocyclus (Acari: Ixodidae). Insects. 2021;12(5):400. Published 2021 Apr 30. doi:10.3390/insects12050400
  3. Sullivan KM, Poffley A, Funkhouser S, et al. Bioabsorption and effectiveness of long-lasting permethrin-treated uniforms over three months among North Carolina outdoor workers. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):52. Published 2019 Jan 23. doi:10.1186/s13071-019-3314-1
  4. Tick Encounter. https://www.tickencounter.org/prevention/permethrin
  5. Eisen L, Rose D, Prose R, et al. Bioassays to evaluate non-contact spatial repellency, contact irritancy, and acute toxicity of permethrin-treated clothing against nymphal Ixodes scapularis ticks. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2017.
  6. Health Effects of Permethrin-Impregnated Army Battle-Dress Uniforms (1994) by National Research Council. 1994. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9274. at https://www.nap.edu/catalog/9274/health-effects-of-permethrin-impregnated-army-battle-dress-uniforms. Last accessed 8/12/17.

For more: