https://rumble.com/v1c8w03-john-olooney-hospitals-are-covering-up-baby-deaths-by-cremating-babies-them.html  Video Here  (Approx. 50 Min)

Hospitals Covering Up Baby Deaths by Cremating Babies Themselves

July 14, 2022

John O’Looney is a brave Funeral Home whistleblower who has been raising the alarm since early on in the pandemic.

He joined us to discuss the findings from this embalmer which are in line with what Dr. Jane Ruby, Richard Hirschman and others have found – long, fibrous strands inside people who have been injected.

During our interview, John revealed shocking information regarding hospitals covering up baby deaths by cremating the babies themselves.

If you would like to support Zeee Media to continue getting the truth out to more people, you can donate via this link:  https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=WUUFGLFXH45R6

You may be unaware, but FEMA helps pay funeral costs for COVID-related deaths.  I actually knew of a man who died, and the family was told if they labeled it a “COVID death” funeral expenses would be paid.  It didn’t matter if he died of COVID or not – it became a matter of money, just like in hospitals and the use of the diabolical CARES Act which is being used to hand-cuff doctors from treating COVID with effective treatments.

For more:

https://www.theepochtimes.com/antibodies-from-vaccines-interfering-instead-of-neutralizing-because-of-spike-protein-changes-dr-risch

Antibodies From Vaccines Interfering Instead of Neutralizing Because of Spike Protein Changes: Dr. Risch

By Zachary Stieber and Jan Jekielek
July 20, 2022

The antibodies triggered by COVID-19 vaccines are interfering with people’s immune systems as newer virus variants emerge, Dr. Harvey Risch said.

The two most widely-used vaccines in the United States, produced by Pfizer and Moderna, both work by sending messenger RNA into muscle cells, where they produce a piece of the spike protein from the virus that causes COVID-19. The spike protein triggers the production of antibodies, which are believed to help prevent infection by SARS-CoV-2, which causes COVID-19, and fight illness if one still gets infected.

But the vaccines are based on the spike protein from the original virus variant, which was displaced early in the pandemic. Since then, a series of newer strains have become dominant around the world, with the latest being BA.5.

(See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • Risch points out what many experts have stated from the get-go: the mRNA gene-therapy injections, which aren’t vaccines, only create a narrow range of antibodies. 
  • Recovery from infection (natural immunity) is always far superior to “vaccines”.
  • Instead of neutralizing antibodies, the “vaccines” create interfering antibodies and are providing negative benefit in 4-8 months after the last dose.
  • Recent studies have indicated that people who were “vaccinated” are more likely to get infected with COVID-19, including Pfizer’s clinical trial in young children (pdf).  Real-world data also show higher rates of infection among the “vaccinated”.
  • Data from the UK showed people who had received both a primary vaccination series and a booster as having three times the rate of symptomatic infection as unvaccinated people.
Yet, research continues to push the gene therapy injections based on faulty research and erroneous modeling.
Fauci and Biden, both fully “vaxxed” and boosted, have tested positive and contracted COVID despite the injections.

Biden just like Fauci, will be taking the accepted narrative treatment, Paxlovid, which has been proven to cause a “rebound effect”.   But heaven-forbid they take either HCQ/zinc, or ivermectin – both of which are cheap, effective, and safe treatments for COVID but have been censored and banned despite decades of safety.

Fauci got major epidemiology and public health questions wrong. Reality and scientific studies have now caught up with him and predictably he says he will step down from his current position before the end of Biden’s term, but is far from making an official announcement.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnagi.2022.903455/full

Inflammation From Peripheral Organs to the Brain: How Does Systemic Inflammation Cause Neuroinflammation?

  • 1Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
  • 2Addiction Research Unit, Osaka Psychiatric Research Center, Osaka Psychiatric Medical Center, Osaka, Japan

As inflammation in the brain contributes to several neurological and psychiatric diseases, the cause of neuroinflammation is being widely studied. The causes of neuroinflammation can be roughly divided into the following domains: viral infection, autoimmune disease, inflammation from peripheral organs, mental stress, metabolic disorders, and lifestyle. In particular, the effects of neuroinflammation caused by inflammation of peripheral organs have yet unclear mechanisms. Many diseases, such as gastrointestinal inflammation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, dermatitis, chronic fatigue syndrome, or myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME), trigger neuroinflammation through several pathways. The mechanisms of action for peripheral inflammation-induced neuroinflammation include disruption of the blood-brain barrier, activation of glial cells associated with systemic immune activation, and effects on autonomic nerves via the organ-brain axis. In this review, we consider previous studies on the relationship between systemic inflammation and neuroinflammation, focusing on the brain regions susceptible to inflammation.

__________________

**Comment**

Lyme/MSIDS also causes peripheral nervous system inflammation.  Once borrelia enter the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), they elicit an inflammatory response.   This study states about 15% of patients with Lyme disease develop peripheral and central nervous system involvement, although I suspect it’s much, much higher.  It also states inflammation plays a causal role in the array of neurologic changes associated with Lyme disease.

http://  Approx. 34 Min

Dr. Steve Harris – IgeneX Testing Explained

For more:

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/07/model-misspecification-and-grossly-inflated-estimates-of-lives-saved/

Model Misspecification and Grossly Inflated Estimates of Lives Saved

Model Misspecification and Grossly Inflated Estimates of Lives Saved

In a recent study published in The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Watson et al. apply mathematical modeling to estimate that mass COVID-19 vaccinations saved between 14-20 million lives worldwide during the first year of the COVID-19 vaccination program. Previous Brownstone [Institute] articles by Horst and Raman have already pointed out several erroneous assumptions in the study regarding infection- vs. vaccine-derived immunity duration as well as the fact it did not account for vaccine adverse events and all-cause mortality risk.

Here, I summarize the mechanics of how the authors arrived at their estimates of deaths averted due to mass vaccinations. I then elaborate on how flawed assumptions in the model can lead to grossly inflated estimates of averted deaths, which may explain the study’s lack of face validity and internal consistency.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Please remember how another erroneous model set this crazy-train in motion that grossly overestimated lives lost due to COVID. Ferguson’s “provably faulty information has arguably done more to move us into the era of medical martial law than any other single piece of misinformation. He was also the man behind a number of similarly over-the-top mortality projections in previous public health scares, including wildly faulty death forecasts for the 2005 bird flu scare and the 2009 swine flu scamdemic test run. So how does someone who consistently gets it so wrong get entrusted with constructing yet another faulty model for yet another public health scare? Hint: The Gates Foundation has 79 million reasons why. He was eventually tangled up in his own lies when he was caught cavorting with his mistress in direct contravention of the anti-social distancing rules that he so forcefully advocates for the peasants, but for some reason, despite making a big show of resigning in apparent disgrace for his actions, he is still advising the UK government on their scamdemic response.” Source

Seems the band plays on.

The conclusion in the opinion pieces states the faulty paper should not be used to inform public policy and guidelines, and that quantitative risk-benefit ratio analyses that use clinical trial or real-world data to compare risks of specific outcomes, such as all-cause mortality or myopericarditis following “vaccination” and coronavirus infection, are much more useful.

I’ll go one further.

This defunct, misleading article needs to be completely retracted.
Because you and I both know that it will be used ad nauseum to push dangerous gene-therapy injections on one and all, based on yet more faulty information that will be taken as gospel.

While the author posts a version of this article with figures and bibliography on ResearchGate, and tweeted the commentary to the original authors of the study in hopes for a response and rebuttal, he also submitted a shortened version to The Lancet Infectious Diseases and is awaiting their reply.

Don’t hold your breath.