Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Why America Doesn’t Trust the CDC – Let me Count the Ways & 12,500 VAERS Records Deleted

https://www.redvoicemedia.com/2022/06/12500-vaers-records-deleted-past-9-weeks-injuries-and-deaths-just-vanished

12,500 VAERS Records Deleted: Past 9 Weeks, Injuries And Deaths Just Vanished

By

Albert Benavides spent twenty-five years as a revenue cycle management expert. He ran the ultra-complex medical billing operations that exist at some of America’s largest hospitals. At one point he managed the 4th-largest diagnostic laboratory in the country, and he also ran his own billing company for a while.

Albert is one of America’s foremost experts on how medical recordkeeping works, and that makes him also one of America’s foremost experts on the VAERS database. VAERS, you’ll remember, is the database of all the illnesses, ailments, and deaths that take place after somebody gets a vaccine in this country.  (See link for video and article)

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • over the past two months more than 12,500 records have vanished in the past nine weeks
    • including two thousand hospitalizations
    • a thousand permanent disabilities
    • five hundred and fifty deaths

____________________

https://www.newsweek.com/why-america-doesnt-trust-cdc-opinion-1713145

Why America Doesn’t Trust the CDC | Opinion

Marty Makary , Professor, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

People don’t trust the CDC. Here’s one example illustrating why. Two weeks ago, with no outcomes data on COVID-19 booster shots for 5-to-11-year-olds, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) vigorously recommended the booster for all 24 million American children in that age group. The CDC cited a small Pfizer study of 140 children that showed boosters elevated their antibody levels—an outcome known to be transitory.

When that study concluded, a Pfizer spokesperson said it did not determine the efficacy of the booster in the 5-to-11-year-olds. But that didn’t matter to the CDC. Seemingly hoping for a different answer, the agency put the matter before its own kangaroo court of curated experts, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

I listened to the meeting, and couldn’t believe what I heard. At times, the committee members sounded like a group of marketing executives. Dr. Beth Bell of the University of Washington said “what we really need to do is to be as consistent and clear and simple as possible,” pointing out that the committee needed “a consistent recommendation which is simple.”  (See link for article)

__________________

**COMMENT**

Important excerpt:

The one dissenting vote came from Dr. Keipp Talbot of Vanderbilt University, who courageously said vaccines, while extremely effective, “are not without their potential side effects.” She questioned the sustainability of vaccinating the population every six months. Many experts agree with her, but they don’t have a platform to speak….

And this, my friends, is how you corner the market.

Why America doesn’t trust the CDC.  The agency:
  • withholds, hides, and skews data
  • insists upon using its own flawed tests
  • has institutional bias
  • lies, repeatedly
  • arbitrarily cherry picks and tosses data
  • is behind the persecution of doctors who defy the accepted narrative
  • receives secret payments and is not a government entity as it not only receives billions in tax dollars annually but receives private funding through the CDC foundation a “tax-free slush fund, wasting tax dollars.” It received 2.3 MILLION last year from the Gates Foundation.
  • owns patents on virtually every aspect of diseases they create guidelines for including vaccines
  • funds horrific experiments on children and animals & some feel the Lyme debacle is actually part 2 of the Tuskagee experiment
  • continues to propagate the political argument that Lyme disease does not persist despite treatment despite science and clinical reality
  • has been accused of not bothering to read the science
  • has been accused of abandoning science
  • purchases and used cell phone data monitoring the public
    • politicians used information from your cell phone to target you
    • Predictwise gave rankings on whether you stayed home, got your “vaccine,” booster, etc.  If you followed orders you got a good COVID score ranking, if you didn’t – well, too bad for you.  Source

  • Please see the following from this source:

    • 1976 swine flu scandal whipped up by CDC junk scientists to develop another vaccine that resulted in an increased risk of GBS
    • 1999 CDC misspent $22.7 Million for CFS
    • 2000 CDC lied to congress on how it spent $7.5 Million on hantavirus
    • 2001 CDC squandered $13 Million for Hepatitis C research
    • 2009 CDC recalled 800,000 doses of swine flu vaccine – failed potency tests
    • 2012 CDC leaked anthrax, SARS, monkeypox – faulty airflow system
    • 2014 CDC’s lack of response to Ebola exposed travelers.  $15 Million worth of isolation chambers sat in a warehouse
    • CDC continues fear campaign pushing people to get flu shot using flawed data (read:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/04/02/coronavirus-if-they-lied-then-why-wouldnt-they-lie-now/)
    • 2020 CDC lies about vaccines causing autism – continues to smear critics
    I would like to add to this list (although this is hardly a conclusive list):
    • 2009 CDC finds hardly any cases of Swine Fluwas Swine Flu or any sort of flu – but hides it from public
    • 2009 CDC stops counting Swine Flu cases yet miraculously estimates there are 22 MILLION cases fear-mongering the public into getting vaccinated
    • 2012 CDC states Morgellons is not infectious – just cotton fibers. To this day they will not accept independent researching showing borrelia involvement.
    • 2015 CDC scientist admits vaccine authors destroyed evidence of harm caused by MMR vaccine
    • 2016 CDC states there is insufficient evidence that Zika causes microcephaly, but weeks later, after plopping it into “Shepherd’s’ criteria they magically announce it does (despite it meeting only 3 of 7 criteria)
    • 2016 CDC scientists create group SPIDER (Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research) and cite numerous scandals involving scientific corruption within CDC
    • 2017 CDC spends $222 million on Zika based on one autopsy – but runs out of money and begs for more
    • 2017 CDC completely ignores research showing 5 out of 5 brains of children with autism have high levels of aluminum
    • CDC uses front groups (NACCHO, ECBT, AAP, IAC) to combat health freedom
    • 2020 CDC refuses accurate COVID-19 tests, insists on making its own. To this day does not have an accurate test, thereby making all U.S. numbers meaningless due to faulty testing
    • 2020 CDC Dr. Fauci secures $2 billion for COVID-19 vaccine, despite research on the SARS vaccine showing poor outcomes – even deaths, fast tracks COVID-19 vaccine (bypassing animal testing, and using limited human testing). Even vaccine proponents are worried.
    • 2020 CDC breaks basic principle of medicine. Whenever there is a death and COVID-19 is detected, the virus is automatically assigned as the cause of death giving a false high death rate. 
    • 2020 CDC continues to downplay Lyme/MSIDS pandemic
    • CDC vilifies any lab doing testing other than their own
    • CDC continues to push their unscientific, flawed guidelines
    • CDC continues to publish flawed data on their website
    • CDC only admits correct facts when a vaccine is being prepared to illicit public demand
    • CDC uses editorials written by industry doctors to fast track a Lyme vaccine which would have little success without assistance
    • CDC’s Paul Mead used his position to push a Lyme vaccine
    • CDC used taxpayer dollars to finance the racketeering scheme identified in the Lisa Torey vs IDSA lawsuit registered in Texas District Court
    Time for a CDC/NIAID/FDA walkaway movement.

Category:

Activism, Lyme, vaccines, Viruses

FDA Recommends COVID Shots For Babies & What VRBPAC Got Wrong: Who Will Hold FDA & VRBPAC Accountable for Failing America?

The FDA vaccine advisory panel unanimously voted 21-0 to recommend Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for infants and young children, stating the totality of the evidence available shows the benefits of the vaccines outweigh the risks of use.  It helps when you get hundreds of thousands of dollars from Pfizer like committee member Arnold Monto.

The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) ignored pleas from experts, the vaccine injured and a congressman representing 17 other lawmakers to halt authorization until questions about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for the nation’s youngest children could be properly addressed.

A top official at Moderna has already said a booster will be necessary.

Fauci even admits there are ZERO studies in children showing boosters reduce hospitalization or death. Senator Rand Paul, a medical doctor, explains that the only studies show people produce antibodies after the injections, but that many researchers question whether this shows efficacy or not.

Paul also pushed for information on how the NIH has continuously refused to release information on their royalties. “The NIH continues to refuse to voluntarily divulge the names of scientists who receive royalties and from which companies. Over the period of time from 2010 to 2016, 27,000 royalty payments were paid to 1800 NIH employees. We know that not because you told us but because we forced you to tell us through the Freedom of Information Act. Over $193 million was given to these 1800 employees. Can you tell me that you have not received a royalty from any entity that you ever oversaw the distribution of money in research grants?”

States have already ordered millions of doses made available prior to FDA authorization by the Biden administration and depending upon whether the FDA and CDC accept the recommendations of their advisory panels, the administration of vaccines for these age groups could start as early as June 21.

BTW: fully “vaxxed” and double boosted Dr. Anthony Fauci got COVID anyway, similarly to millions of others – continuing to show the futility of the injections. Please see this important article on how the CDC is withholding data and skewing “vaccine” effectiveness to prevent “vaccine” hesitancy and how you can not trust any numbers or data from this corrupt organization.

This important video on the Dr. Jane Ruby show, interviews Canadian Physician and molecular biologist, Dr. Daniel Nagase, who clearly explains how the bioweapon shots from ALL of the companies are poisoning human DNA for generations. 

And go here for the latest VAERS data showing these shots are connected to more adverse reactions & deaths than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/what-vrbpac-got-wrong-who-will-hold?

What VRBPAC Got Wrong: Who Will Hold FDA and VRBPAC Accountable for Failing America?

VRBPAC Members Saw All the Same Information You Will See Here, But Voted Unanimously Anyway to Recommend Approval of a Worse Then Futile Vaccine for Toddlers and Babies

James Lyons-Weiler

Here’s a few things VRBPAC members saw and voted to recommend approval anyway:

  1. They Proceeded for Recommendation of Approval Based on a Guess that Three Doses Will Correct Negative Efficacy.Pfizer has a serious problem: their two dose data reflected the reality I’ve been reporting about (and predicted) since the Israeli and Barnstable County data came out: the confidence interval for their estimate of the number cases prevented by three doses of their vaccine points, if anything, to negative efficacy (-369.1 to 99.6). The confidence interval crosses zero. The problem is not just that the result is based on a ridiculously small number of data points. See Point 2.
  2. The problem also is that this result confirms (validates) the result of the two-dose vaccine. Their measure of vaccine efficacy was only 14.5% seven days after the second dose the confidence intervals crossed zero, so they were not statistically significant.
  3. They relied on proxy outcome measures (neutralizing antibodies). Neutralizing antibodies sound good, but they are the wrong antibodies (the Wuhan-1 virus is extinct). Look at the antibody response to Omicron (Pfizer):

    I predict the entire vaccination program is going to drive COVID-19 numbers up across the board routinely and on a regular, ongoing basis due to antibody dependent enhancement, as predict by Dr. Fantini’s analysis.

  4. Given these three points alone, FDA might just as well be staring at a blank sheet of paper and rubberstamp the approval.Look at the confidence interest after Dose 2 and Dose 3.
  5. No one raised the issue of Failure to Meet FDA’s required 50% efficacy. Moderna and Pfizer’s own endpoint data fall short of the 50% mark. Pfizer decreased their dose and this seems to have decreased the reported adverse events. But we’ll get to the real problem with adverse events shortly.
  6. Their numbers are ridiculously small. Pfizer showed an estimate of of 80.3% vaccine efficacy is based on – get this – 7 cases in the placebo group and 3 in the vaccine group. Notice the emblazoned 80% – as if that data point has any basis in reality.
  7. They are ignoring the risk of altered neurodevelopment. The Moderna vaccine especially had high numbers of high fevers (>104°). Many studies exist that show that high fever following vaccination is associated with autism, especially if the kids are given acetominophen.  Please see:  https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/three-years-later-after-ipak-alerted
  8. Moderna presented antibody data against the reference strain (Wuhan-1). But We don’t only care about how good a vaccine is at generating antibodies. Moderna knows this. VRBPAC knows this. Now you know this, too.

9. Inconsistent case definition. Moderna only ran PCR tests if patients in the vaccinated group had two symptoms. In other words, they made up their own clinical designation of “COVID-19”. Under CDC’s case definition (which is also not correct), Moderna’s data show that in kids 2 to 5, “vaccine efficacy” was 36.8% but under Moderna’s new definition, 46.4%. Moderna also used antigen tests, making any measure of efficacy incomparable to other studies.

10. Risk of Hospitalization Cited Out of Context.

One committee member compared the risk of a child dying from Covid to a person being struck by lighting (see my calculations here):

They showed the Omicron hospitalization rate “surge”:

Yet it’s much lower than that for influenza, per CDC:

2015-2016 Hospitalization Rate (Per 100,000 cases) from Influenza (Source: CDC)

Here’s the report for your reference…  Read more

11. They May Have Broken the Rules of Engagement for Open Meetings

Any reasonable person would expect that public open meetings held by organizations such as VRBPAC would know and follow administrative rules for open meetings. How is it then that VPBPAC members only managed to ask questions and voice their opinions on how necessary (or not) COVID-19 vaccination in children might be AFTER the votes were made to approve the vaccine for children under 5?

Dr. Meryl Nass was denied an opportunity to speak in the public comment period, yet the same pro-vaccine mother was able to speak two days in a row. Thus, the public may have been denied the opportunity to contribute their comments. This is being looked at by lawyers; if it true the FDA broke the rules of open meetings, then any ethical judge would rule that this vote to recommend is null and void ab initio.

Category:

Activism, research, vaccines

Did We Win Against the WHO?

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/interview/who-updates/

Did we win against the WHO?

WHO treaty and IHR update after WHA 75

​In the last few weeks, health advocates in the U.S. have seen massive wins in our stand against the rapid and coercive development of a global health governance. Thanks to your efforts to sound the alarm, the U.S. Congress has come alive with new bills, new sponsors on existing bills, and letters from the House and the Senate reminding the president that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and no international agreement will push that aside.

So where are we now with the global health agenda? Read on for updates to the U.S. involvement with the World Health Organization so you can keep the momentum going!

What happened with the proposed US IHR amendments?

In January 2022, the United States, along with approximately 40 other countries, proposed amendments to 13 articles of the existing WHO International Health Regulations.[i] At WHA 75 in Geneva from May 22 through 28, 2022,[ii] the Assembly adopted a resolution to substantially amend one article of the International Health Regulations regarding timelines for amendments to the IHR, along with “necessary” changes to four additional articles to reinforce those major changes. Member States of the World Health Organization will have the opportunity to reject or accept the amendments with reservations (explained below). The other 12 amendments proposed by the U.S. are not off the table — these will now be addressed by the new Working Group on IHR Amendments which will report to the World Health Assembly in 2024, the same year the pandemic treaty is planned to be voted on.

The final version of the amendment was negotiated in “informal discussions” outside of the WHA meetings. U.S. Deputy Secretary Colin McIff of the HHS Office of Global Affairs explained on the record that, “Member States decided to commence a Member-State led process to consider proposed amendments2 to the International Health Regulations (2005) beyond those adopted below.” [iii] That footnote you see mid-sentence is in a WHA document and refers to the 12 proposed amendments rumored to be withdrawn. It refers to “Including the other proposed amendments set out in the annex of Document A75/18, as well as other amendments which have or may be submitted by other IHR (2005) States Parties or the Director-General, including through the above-mentioned Member State-led process.” (emphasis added) Document A75/18 includes the amendments as submitted by the U.S. to the WHO. So not only are all of the U.S. amendments still proposed for consideration, more amendments from other Member States are invited as well.

Details on the adopted amendment

The amendment adopted at the WHA to Article 59: Entry into force; period for rejection or reservations, regarding the timeline for new amendments to the IHR to be adopted and become legally binding on Member States was the one never thought to be withdrawn.

The U.S. wanted to reduce the timeline for adoption of new amendments from a 2-year process to a 6-month process. Right now, after notification of an adopted amendment, countries have 18 months to reject or make reservations, and an additional 6 months before those amendments go into force. The proposal adopted by WHA 75 decreases that timeline to 10 months instead of 18 months to reject or reserve, and two additional months for effect, shortening the entire timeline by a year.

Amendment to Section 59 adopted by the Assembly,[iv] along with additional language changes to Articles 55, 61, 62, 63, having to do with the amendment process, rejections and reservations, and the timeline for amendments to go into force was proposed to reinforce the changes proposed to Article 59. These additional articles were not in the original U.S. proposal but were deemed necessary after informal negotiations.[v]

Throughout the Assembly, countries voiced opposition to, or concern with, changes to WHO authority and reach by way of amending the IHR and creating a new pandemic treaty. Notably, Brazil President Jair Bolsanaro stated Brazil would have no part of a pandemic treaty[vi] (and has been on record since 2020 considering leaving the WHO entirely[vii]). Other countries expressing concern included Botswana, Iran, Bangladesh, Namibia, India, Brunei, the Russian Federation,[viii] and several African states.[ix]

What to watch for now?

Health Advocates can keep an eye on the WHO process through 2024, but pay attention to what is happening in the WHO’s backyard which will eventually come knocking.

WHA created two new WHO groups to work on IHR changes.

The Assembly agreed to the creation of two new groups in the WHO to work on updating the IHR. The Working Group on IHR Regulations (WGIHR) will meet over the next two years to collect, discuss, and propose “targeted” amendments to the IHR at the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024.[x] The WGIHR will be helped by a new IHR Review Committee to focus on “technical recommendations” (changes that are not considered substantial enough to be amendments but bring the IHR in line with amendments and goals for strengthening the WHO).

The WGIHR must coordinate with the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), “as both the International Health Regulations (2005) and the new instrument are expected to play central roles in pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response in the future.”[xi]

Timeline as of June 1, 2022 (all subject to change)

  • TBD – Official notice from the WHO Director-General of adoption of resolution to amend Articles 59, 55, 61, 62 and 63 of the IHR, which starts the clock ticking for reservations or rejections
  • TBD — Member States must reject or take reservation. By law, States should have 18 months, per the existing and legally binding regulations in force now. Some wonder, however, if the DG will impose the newly adopted timeline even though it is not yet in force. (In other words, the U.S. will have 10 to 18 months to respond to the amendments.)
  • June 16-17 — Second meeting of INB to inform drafting of pandemic treaty[xii]
  • August 2022 — First draft of pandemic treaty expected
  • September 30, 2022 — Deadline for proposed amendments to IHR
  • October 1, 2022 — Deadline for creation of IHR Review Committee for technical recommendations to proposed amendments and to inform the work of the WGIHR
  • November 15, 2022 — Deadline for first meeting of WGIHR
  • January 15, 2023 — Requested deadline for IHR Review Committee to submit a report to the DG, who will transfer it to the WGIHR immediately
  • May 2023 — World Health Assembly 76
  • May 2024 — World Health Assembly 77 to consider targeted amendments to IHR as well as pandemic treaty.

The IHR and treaty are not the only way to move a global health agenda forward.

Outside of these documents, meetings, and negotiations, there are other agreements strategically being put into place. The World Bank is setting up accounts for a new global health security fund for pandemic preparedness, which already has over $3.2 billion pledged by countries around the globe.[xiii] The WHO opened a new global hub for pandemic and epidemic intelligence in Germany for “data, surveillance, and analytics innovation…the largest network of global data to predict, prevent, detect, prepare for, and respond to pandemic and epidemic risks worldwide.”[xiv] The WHO also has ongoing research, pilot programs, and guidance regarding digital documentation of COVID-19 tests and vaccination certificates.[xv] Switzerland is home to the new WHO BioHub where countries can rapidly share novel biological materials and pathogens.[xvi] Negotiations to share intellectual property (patent rights) for pandemic medical products have been ongoing at the World Trade Organization.[xvii] Right now all of these agreements and negotiations are voluntary, but all of these issues are expected to be addressed and become legally binding through the pandemic treaty.

In America there are state and federal laws, bills, and regulations either aligning with or rejecting the WHO. Stand for Health Freedom already reported on the 2017 CDC quarantine regulation updates that included the WHO definition of public health emergency.[xviii] State legislatures started seeing bills referencing WHO definitions as well, including the Mental Health Parity Act that did not pass the Georgia House this past session.[xix] The Biden administration created an Office of Climate Change and Health Equity in 2021, [xx] and added to it an Office of Environmental Justice, within the Health and Human Services agency. [xxi] This new creation is in line with the “One Health” approach of the WHO for the new pandemic treaty, which includes humans, animals, and the environment together in public health.

Here’s the great news.

Americans have seen lawmakers wake up and start opposing WHO takeover of U.S. public health decisions.

Since the launch of the SHF action to support HR 419, No Taxpayer Funding for the WHO Act, there have been 39 new cosponsors! Two senators[xxii] as well as House members of the Freedom Caucus[xxiii] sent letters to the White House insisting the U.S. reform their relationship with the WHO or pull out altogether. Some representatives have been making public statements against WHO involvement, like Mary Miller from Illinois.[xxiv] Candidates for governor are speaking out against WHO overreach after witnessing two years of federal overreach and promising to stand strong to protect the health of their constituents.[xxv] State legislators, like in Louisiana, are voicing opposition as well![xxvi]

Additionally, in just one week three new bills were introduced in Congress to protect U.S. sovereignty in public health matters. Senator Rick Scott of Florida introduced S4305 on May 25, a bill to limit the authority of the WHO on the U.S. and oppose amendments not approved by Congress.[xxvii] Senator Ron Johnson announced his introduction of a bill, “No WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty Without Senate Approval Act.”[xxviii] And Representatives Rogers and Massie introduced HR 7806, the American Sovereignty Restoration Act,” which expands congressional oversight beyond the WHO to its parent organization the United Nations.[xxix]

Because of your voice, our lawmakers are taking action, and quickly!

Steps You Can Take Now:

You are making a difference! Our lawmakers are hearing your message about protecting our rights and our Constitution when it comes to health. Let’s keep the momentum going!

Step 1: Tell your lawmakers about the WHO’s plans for global health governance. Your representatives can support HR 419, and your senators can make sure they are doing their constitutional duty to advise and approve of any international treaties. Our campaign makes it easy to get in touch with email and phone scripts that you can use or adapt to send a message.

Stop the WHO!

Step 2: We can stop medical tyranny by voting people into office who will stand for health freedom! To have good candidates on the ballot in November, we must vote now in the primaries. Check out where your candidates stand using our Vote for Health Freedom Guide for your state! Go to our Vote for Health Freedom page, or Text the letters VHF to 52886, to learn about candidates in your area!

Vote for Health Freedom

Step 3: Please support our work in bringing this information to light. Every penny counts toward exposing the global health agenda and educating our lawmakers into action!

Donate
References & Sources

___________________

**Comment**

According to an article written last year, the U.S. is on course to become a ‘digital dictatorship’ under a proposed biomedical research agency. This agency would merge national security with public health, a perfect formula for a dangerous agenda that would destroy medical freedom as we know it.

This agency would “use both physical and mental health ‘warning signs’ to prevent outbreaks of disease or violence before they occur. Such a system is a recipe for a technocratic ‘pre-crime’ organization with the potential to criminalize both mental and physical illness as well as ‘wrongthink.’”

This article proves the political interference at HHS as well as the fact governments are working in lockstep to bring in digital I.D.s & a social credit system.

The CDC already rules both research and the medical profession with an iron fist and medical freedom is increasingly under fire.
All of this sounds like a perfect prelude to global “vaccine” passports.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Despite COVID Vax Destroying Female Reproductive Systems & Killing Youth, FDA Rubberstamps Moderna 2-Dose Shot for Kids Based on Insufficient Evidence

https://thenewamerican.com/covid-vax-destroying-female-reproductive-systems-killing-kids-toxicologist-warns/  Video Here (Approx. 20 Min)

Covid Vax Destroying Female Reproductive Systems & Killing Kids, Toxicologist Warns

by Alex Newman
Audio Playe

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 20:38 — 28.5MB)

The experimental Covid injections forced on millions by the Biden administration are killing people and wreaking havoc on female reproductive organs and other body systems, warned toxicologist Dr. Janci Lindsey in this interview on Conversations That Matter with The New American magazine’s Alex Newman. Dr. Lindsey, who holds PhDs in biochemistry and molecular biology and serves as director of Toxicology and molecular biology for a toxicology firm, worked on Rockefeller-funded research into fertility regulating vaccines in the 1990s. Among other concerns, she warned that the shots are causing all sorts of toxic effects on the human body. Within the next 6 months, humanity should expect to see another “plandemic” to bring in more medical tyranny, she warned. Dr. Lindsey urged everyone to refuse to comply.

At 11:30 Dr. Lindsey discusses minocycline as a therapeutic to ameliorate COVID “vaccine” injury as well as glutathione, NAC, proper diet, and vitamin C.  She also discussed how the spike protein hangs out in the lymph nodes and that ivermectin & HCQ may help this as well as the dangers blood clotting.

___________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-moderna-two-dose-covid-vaccine-kids/

Breaking: FDA Panel Recommends Moderna Two-Dose COVID Vaccine for Kids Ages 6 to 17 Despite Serious Safety Concerns

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory panel on Tuesday voted 22 – 0 to authorize Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for children ages 6 to 11 and 12 to 17 despite the lack of short- and long-term safety data and no evidence children are at risk of serious illness.

By Megan Redshaw

6/14/22

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) vaccine advisory panel today voted unanimously to recommend Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 6 to 17 after determining the benefits of the vaccine outweigh the risks for use.

The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) voted 22 to 0 to recommend Moderna’s two-dose vaccine for 6- to 11-year-olds at half the strength of the adult version, and 22 to 0 in favor of authorizing the shot for 12- to 17-year-olds at the same strength as adults.

The FDA’s vaccine advisors will meet again on Wednesday to discuss amending Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine to include the “administration of the primary series to infants and children 6 months through 5 years of age.”

(See link for article)

__________________

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/fda-rubberstamps-the-moderna-covid?

FDA Rubberstamps the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine for Kids Aged 6-17 Based on Insufficient Evidence

Yesterday, the vote was in 100% in favor of “approval” of the vaccine for kids 6 to 17. None of the votes were based on Science.

James Lyons-Weiler

This article is dedicated to the parents of the children not yet harmed or killed by COVID-19 vaccines. We are trying to warn you that the FDA and CDC are whole-heartedly engaged in fraud.

Dr. Toby Rogers deserves credit for sitting through a grueling, “heart-braking” nine hours of FDA rubber-stamping COVID-19 vaccines based on clinically trivial endpoints. This rubber-stamp is based on data showing no serious cases of COVID19 in children (no hospitalizations). Here I review most of his interview with Steve Kirsch. (Link to video).

Under EUA rules, an emergency must be in place. Yesterday, I pointed out the vanishingly small number of cases since March 2020.  (See link for Weiler’s point by point detailing of the FDA’s “political theatre.”

____________________

**COMMENT**

There was a public comment session during the meeting where many expressed serious concern over recommending a gene therapy injection to an age group that has almost a ZERO risk of experiencing severe illness or death from COVID.

Dr. Harvey Klein, orthopedic surgeon, mechanical engineer and yes, even a rocket scientist said he is appalled at the FDA’s arrogance in even “thinking of vaccinating healthy children with outdated, highly toxic COVID vaccines,” and that have a 99.998% recovery rate with no sequelae.

Pharmacologist, pharmacist, FDA and healthcare policy oversight fellow and FDA reform advocate at the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington, D.C., Dr. David Gortler states the FDA and the advisory panel have “maintained a highly non-scientific and casual attitude toward approving a vaccine whose short- and long-term effects on children are unclear.”  After reminding the FDA of the need for parents to be informed of “vaccine” safety, he stated the FDA has failed to address genotoxicity, teratogenicity, oncogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines and cardiovascular risk following “vaccination”, potential fertility issues and clinical effects of spike proteins in donated or transfused blood.  He ended by stating that four million doses must be administered to children 5 to 11 years of age to prevent a single ICU admission in the same age group.

This means that if you assume two doses per child, two MILLION children must risk potentially serious side-effects and/or death to prevent a single child from entering the ICU.

But the real clincher came from Kathy Dopp and Dr. Stephanie Seneff’s analysis which highlighted the following:
  • Children under 18 are 51 more times more likely to die from the injection than they are to die from COVID if not “vaccinated.”
  • The COVID injection actually increases a child’s risk of dying from COVID.

It was also pointed out that instead of breaking down the data per age group, the “vaccine” manufacturer lumped all the age groups together to “massage” the data.  When each group is looked at separately, the shot fails in each category according to Dr. Toby Rogers. He also points out that Moderna created 20 adverse event tables allowing it to simply eliminate or hide data is didn’t like. Please also see this important paper written by Dr. Rogers on how the FDA is set to decide on Pfizer’s jab for kids based on unethical trial data that makes the data functionally useless for making decisions.

Again, it can not be over emphasized that science is now being done by press release and the very people doing the “science” are selling the products. 

Lastly, despite the CDC’s narrowed case definition of “myocarditis,” which excludes cases of cardiac arrest, ischemic strokes and deaths due to heart problems that occur before one has the chance to go to the emergency department, 635 cases of myocarditis in the 5 to 17 age group have been confirmed. Imagine the numbers if the case definition were more realistic and accurate. Lyme/MSIDS patients should be well aware of the CDC’s shenanigans with “case definitions” by now.

It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see something is rotten in Denmark.
Take a stand and tell the FDA to get their hands off our children.

For more:

The global experiment must stop.
Millions have already been adversely affected by these clot shots and nobody knows what the future holds for those who received these gene therapy shots that have caused more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

COVID “Vaccine” Injuries Overwhelm Courts

https://thehighwire.com/videos/covid-vaccine-injuries-overwhelm-courts/  Video Here (Approx. 9 Min)

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) is overwhelmed and understaffed with the amount of injury claims being filed from the Covid-19 “Vaccines”. The program is now on life support and is on the verge of collapse.

  • Thousands of “vaccine” injured may not receive payment from federal programs any time soon
  • Congress has failed to act
  • Del BigTree goes through the history of the kangaroo court for “vaccine injuries” and shows the dark backstory and how an expert did find an mechanism in which vaccines can cause autism but was removed from representing the HHS.
    • Prior to COVID, mainstream media stated that “vaccines” were safe and effective no matter what.
    • Due to the unsafe and ineffective COVID shots, mainstream medicine is now admitting some people do in fact get hurt or even die after injections.
  • Current VAERS report on the COVID shots are given
  • Members of UK Parliament push for the COVID-10 “Vaccine” Damage bill
  • Watch this short video on how the ACIP votes for vaccines with virtually no data.

https://rumble.com/v17kzky-playing-russian-roulette-with-each-and-every-jab-the-nhs-data-tells-you-all  Video Here (Approx. 2 Min)

Playing Russian Roulette: The NHS Data Tells You All You Need to Know

Dr. Richard Urso explains that taking the COVID shots is like playing Russian Roulette. Please remember that the shots are under EUA which means they are currently in  clinical trials where data is being collected.  Like any other study there are different arms to the ongoing studies which includes varying doses, and a placebo (or other “vaccine”), and a researcher has discovered that there are deadly injection batches.

“92% of the deaths in England have been in the triple-vaccinated. 52 times higher risk in deaths in kids from 10 to 14, and the data’s pretty — thank God for the National Health Service data that’s actually been helpful. Our CDC has been a complete, fabricated bunch of lies …” ~ Dr. Urso

https://www.brighteon.com/d164dc32-3965-43d3-ab47-0ab819353cb5  (Approx. 12 Min)

The Dark Truth of America’s “Vaccine” Court

Stew Peters interviews Wayne Rohde, father of a vaccine injured child who explains how not ONE COVID shot injury has been compensated, as well as the dark history of the court.  Also see these videos for more on the court.

The answer of course is to make “vaccine” manufacturers liable again.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines