Previous COVID-19 may cut risk of reinfection 84%

People who had COVID-19 had an 84% lower risk of becoming reinfected and a 93% lower risk of symptomatic infection during 7 months of follow-up, according to findings from a large, multicenter study published late last week in The Lancet.

The prospective cohort SARS-CoV-2 Immunity and Reinfection Evaluation (SIREN) study, by Public Health England Colindale researchers, involved 25,661 workers at public hospitals throughout England who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 every 2 to 4 weeks and antibodies at enrollment and every 4 weeks. Volunteers also completed questionnaires on symptoms and exposures every 2 weeks.

Of the 25,661 participants, 32.3% were assigned to the baseline positive (possibly or probably previously infected) group, and 67.7% were assigned to the negative group. Of the 8,278 positive participants, 91.2% had SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at study enrollment, while 7.0% were negative for antibodies but had a previously positive antibody and/or coronavirus test, and 1.8% had tested positive for COVID-19 but didn’t have linked antibody data.  (See link for article)


Important excerpts:

  • Among the baseline-positive group, 50.3% of infections were symptomatic, with 32.3% involving usual coronavirus symptoms. Among the baseline-negative cohort, 80.3% of infections were symptomatic, 66.1% of them involving usual COVID-19 symptoms.
“This study shows that previous infection with SARS-CoV-2 induces effective immunity to future infections in most individuals,” the authors wrote.”

In a commentary in the same journal, Florian Krammer, PhD, of the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York City, said that although natural infection tends to induce lower and more variable antibody concentrations than COVID-19 vaccines, “the findings of the authors suggest that infection and the development of an antibody response provides protection similar to or even better than currently used SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.

He added, “The SIREN study adds to a growing number of studies, which demonstrate that infection does protect against reinfection, and probably in an antibody-dependent manner.”

What’s important to remember is that historically viruses weaken over time – particularly if they are NOT challenged. What challenges viruses? VACCINES. If a virus is allowed to go through a population, they develop natural herd immunity. Problem solved. Only the weak and vulnerable should shield themselves. The healthy should freely roam, act normal, and allow the virus to run its course.

Please remember this historical fact has been accepted for decades but is now being denied by our beloved WHO. Suddenly, the only hope for mankind is ‘getting the jab.‘ This is ludicrous and defies everything known about viruses. The WHO has a lot to answer for and has colluded with both deep state government entities and corrupt pharmaceutical interests to keep the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) plandemic going. Emails received through a FOIA lawsuit show how Fauci and the WHO accommodated China by trying to control information about COVID-19.

%d bloggers like this: