Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

How the Definition of ‘Fully Vaccinated’ Misleads People on COVID-19 ‘Vaccine’ Safety & Efficacy & New Study Proves the ‘Vaccinated’ Are Dragging Out the Pandemic

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/how-the-definition-of-fully-vaccinated

How The Definition of “Fully Vaccinated” Misleads People on COVID-19 Vaccine Safety & Efficacy: An Explanation For CNN’s Drew Griffin

Received one dose only? You’re Unvaccinated. Two doses? Wait another 14 days. If you survive, congratulations. You’re fully vaccinated.
Everywhere I turn I see claims of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety from studies in the US that defy all logic and reason. The results are the opposite of those seen in the UK and Israel. Here, I go through claims made that have led to the belief that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe, and effective, and explore factors that have been carefully manipulated to produce that misperception.
  1. Moderna Vaccine’s 95% Efficacy
  2. “An Epidemic of the Unvaccinated”
  3. “Boosters are Effective”
  4. “Pfizer’s Vaccine >90% Effective (ahem, “Useful”) in Children Aged 5-12”
  5. “Zero deaths and serious adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines”

I recently watched a CNN segment in which Drew Griffin’s beliefs are absolutely contradicted by the facts that CDC defines “Fully Vaccinated” as people who have made it to the second week (14 days) after their second dose. The fact that anyone who experiences adverse events or dies, and anyone who is diagnosed with COVID-19 before 2 weeks have passed after their second dose are not counted as deaths in the “fully vaccinated”. That means that a person who is vaccinating might not be considered “Fully Vaccinated” until five weeks after their first dose.

It is shameful for Griffin to not know this fact, and the impact of this fact on calculations of breakthrough infections vs. re-infections vs. infections in the “unvaccinated”. Therefore, I outline in detail for Dr. Griffin the key information he needs to know.

  1. Moderna Vaccine’s 95% Efficacy. In January 2021, I published an article in Robert F. Kennedy’s online magazine, The Defender. The article, entitled “Discrepancies in Moderna’s FDA Report Demand Answers”, I offered the following analysis:

“In contrast to what Moderna reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the early months of COVID-19, its mRNA vaccine is not an established technology. It is new. As a new, experimental vaccine, it deserves close and objective scrutiny.

Moderna reports 94.5% efficacy. The “efficacy” of vaccines is understood to be a measure of the effectiveness of the vaccine on an ideal population, and differs from “effectiveness,” which is how well a vaccine manages to induce evidence of immunity in the real population upon which it is being used.

Moderna reported to the FDA (Zhang, 2020) efficacy as the ratio of the rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the vaccinated (16 infected out of 28,068 vaccinated) to the rate of infection in the placebo group (275 infected out of 27,956 given placebo).

Close inspection of Moderna’s data made public ahead of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBAC) meeting that was scheduled for Dec. 17, 2020, however, reveals that among the vaccinated, an additional 81 participants and 118 among the placebo participants developed a COVID-19 diagnosis between the first and second shots. These participants were determined to be ineligible for the second dose and removed from the study.

By my calculations, these additional cases shift the vaccine efficacy from 94.5% to 75.4%.

If a chemotherapy agent is being tested against another cancer treatment, the deaths that occur between scheduled treatment rounds must be counted. It is misleading not to count these additional cases of COVID-19 in the Moderna vaccine trial — the 94.5% efficacy is not based in clinical reality even for an ideal population.”

“Efficacy” here, and in Moderna’s use, means the ability of the vaccine to prevent a certain condition in an ideal population. They excluded people with health conditions – for example, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, autoimmune disorders.

What does this mean for the rest of us? Well, given that they reported 95% efficacy, when it should have been 74.4%, means that the vaccine coverage needed for herd immunity was going to be way low.

Fauci’s initial 66-67% coverage needed for herd immunity was tied to Moderna’s 95% efficacy. Fauci never should have come in that low, for two reasons. First, Moderna’s 95% efficacy – the performance of the vaccine in an ideal population – was not, as I showed, 95%. Second, that efficacy could not have been expected to translate into effectiveness – the performance of the vaccine in a non-ideal population, the one with people with metabolic disorder, diabetes, and autoimmune conditions.

Even though later trials used the same tactic of excluding people who got COVID-19 before the second dose, the official estimate of vaccine effectiveness in fact took a nose-dive in the 60-70% range in studies on sample groups representative of the full adult population, and yet to this day public health servants still cite the vaccine as “effective as 95% as in the Moderna trial”.

The data from Barnstable, Massachusetts tell a different story. This was an MMWR report that showed that 74% of new cases in Barnstable County were in those who had been exposed to COVID-19 vaccines. The report actually used the term “exposed”, and they also showed that the RT-PCR cycle threshold distribution of the two groups, “exposed” and “unexposed” were not different. This was the report that led CDC Director Rochelle Walensky to warn that people who were vaccinated still needed to wear a mask and to socially distance.

Almost all of the new cases were Delta variants. Using the 74% of cases in the vaccinated number, it is possible to estimate vaccine efficacy against the Delta variant. Assuming an R0 of 2.6, the VE of all vaccines combined in use in Barnstable County for single-dose exposed persons was almost precisely zero. When estimated for persons exposed to two doses, the VE falls to -0.26, or =26%. People in Barnstable County who are “fully vaccinated” have a 26% increased risk of COVID-19 diagnosis.

See: Outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Infections, Including COVID-19 Vaccine Breakthrough Infections, Associated with Large Public Gatherings — Barnstable County, Massachusetts, July 2021 Weekly / August 6, 2021 / 70(31);1059-1062

It is worth pointing out that because the clinical trials used PCR to determine the case status in the patients considered “vaccinated” and those considered “unvaccinated”, the actual efficacy estimates were likely invalid given they should have been calculated after a certain number of COVID-19 cases had occurred. With false positive rates of PCR ranging from 11% to over 90%, the actual disposition of patients in the vaccinated and unvaccinated arms of the trial is anyone’s guess.

  1. “An Epidemic of the Unvaccinated”

CDC’s Director, Rochelle Walensky, said yesterday that CDC’s definition of “fully vaccinated” might need to be updated due to boosters. This semantic gameplay would back the population into mandated boosters if the OSHA rule comes through. Remember that it was Walensky who overruled the FDA’s decision to not recommend boosters for all. So now, we are facing the confusing situation in which people w/vaccine cards are no longer “fully vaccinated”. As we have seen, the efficacy of the current vaccines against extinct variants might be reasonably high (whatever it is), but the efficacy against extant variants seems to be in question. So, with eternal boosters, perhaps no one will ever be considered “Fully Vaccinated” in the US under CDC’s ever-changing definition.

CDC: When You’ve Been Fully Vaccinated https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/fully-vaccinated.html

The accuracy of the claim that the new cases in the US are occurring primarily in the unvaccinated hinges entirely on the CDC’s definition of “Fully Vaccinated”. We know that people who have had two doses are not considered “Fully Vaccinated” until day 14 after their second dose. So, when new cases occur in the partially vaccinated, they do not count toward cases in the vaccinated. There is significant evidence that COVID-19 vaccination may impair the immune system for a short period of time following administration; in particular, the likelihood of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, or an infection by any other respiratory virus or bacterium may be more likely following vaccination. In animal trials on SARS and MERS viruses, close relatives of SARS-CoV-2, and in studies in humans of the RSV virus, this phenomenon was called “disease enhancement”. If disease enhancement is occurring after the first dose, or within two weeks following receipt of the second dose, the CDC’s semantics will bias the case count data and make it appear as if those exposed to vaccines have a lower risk of COVID-19 infection than those who are unvaccinated.

Proof of this type of statistical manipulation in action can be found in a report from the OKLAHOMA COVID-19 WEEKLY REPORT Weekly Epidemiology and Surveillance Report September 19-25, 2021, which, after reporting more new cases in the unvaccinated than in the vaccinated, dropped this fact into a footnote of at table:

“**Vaccine breakthrough cases is (sic) defined as an individual with a COVID-19 positive laboratory results (PCR/Antigen) and documentation of COVID-19 vaccination that meets the definition of fully vaccinated. (Individuals are considered fully vaccinated ≥2 weeks after receiving the last dose in the COVID-19 vaccine series.)”

Due to this sleight-of-statistical-hand, we will need to revisit all of the clinical studies and non-peer reviewed press releases on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines as well as the CDC’s non-peer-reviewed MMWR reports and re-estimate vaccine efficacy, breakthrough cases, and vaccine safety.

“Boosters are Effective”

The claims that boosters are effective begs the question: effective at what?

  • Preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2? No.
  • Reducing deaths due to COVID-19? No.
  • Reducing hospitalization of patients with positive PCR results (true positives + false positives combined)? Yes. However, remember that people are not considered “boosted” until fourteen days after the second dose. Unless COVID-19 cases in those waiting for fourteen days to be counted are included in the calculation of breakthrough cases, we cannot know the true efficacy of boosters.

Pfizer’s Vaccine >90% Effective (ahem, “Useful”) in Children Aged 5-12

News reports tell us that “kid-size doses of Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine appear safe and nearly 91% effective at preventing symptomatic infections in 5- to 11-year-olds”.

The Phase 2/3 trial had one=month safety follow-up, and yet the same new source touts “The shots could begin early next month — with the first children in line fully protected by Christmas — if regulators give the go-ahead.”

The Pfizer website describes the trial as “the first of a pivotal trial”. The doses were spaced 21 days apart – meaning that children were not considered “vaccinated” until five weeks after their initial exposure.

It is noteworthy that the incidence of COVID-19 in children is so low that the trial had to accrue patients from four countries. It is also noteworthy that the trial did not undergo peer review; in fact, the company published the results in a press release, which included caveats that the release includes “forward-looking statements”, meaning they put a positive spin on the contents of the press release to encourage investors.

Among those forward-looking statements?

“In participants 5 to 11 years of age, the vaccine was safe, well tolerated and showed robust neutralizing antibody responses.”

The press release does not specify if the vaccination produced neutralizing antibodies against the initial Wuhan SARS-CoV-2 virus, which is extinct, or the more recent variants, such as the Delta variant.

Their less-than forward-looking statements included:

  1. “There is a remote chance that the vaccine could cause a severe allergic reaction
    • A severe allergic reaction would usually occur within a few minutes to one hour after getting a dose of the vaccine. For this reason, vaccination providers may ask individuals to stay at the place where they received the vaccine for monitoring after vaccination
    • Signs of a severe allergic reaction can include difficulty breathing, swelling of the face and throat, a fast heartbeat, a bad rash all over the body, dizziness, and weakness
    • If an individual experiences a severe allergic reaction, they should call 9-1-1 or go to the nearest hospital
  2. Myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart) have occurred in some people who have received the vaccine. In most of these people, symptoms began within a few days following receipt of the second dose of the vaccine. The chance of having this occur is very low. Individuals should seek medical attention right away if they have any of the following symptoms after receiving the vaccine:
    • chest pain
    • shortness of breath
    • feelings of having a fast-beating, fluttering, or pounding heart
  3. Side effects that have been reported with the vaccine include:
    • severe allergic reactions; non-severe allergic reactions such as rash, itching, hives, or swelling of the face; myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle); pericarditis (inflammation of the lining outside the heart); injection site pain; tiredness; headache; muscle pain; chills; joint pain; fever; injection site swelling; injection site redness; nausea; feeling unwell; swollen lymph nodes (lymphadenopathy); diarrhea; vomiting; arm pain
  4. These may not be all the possible side effects of the vaccine. Serious and unexpected side effects may occur. The vaccine is still being studied in clinical trials. Call the vaccination provider or healthcare provider about bothersome side effects or side effects that do not go away.”
    The FDA has determined that the “study” was not large enough to have detected myocarditis – and yet Pfizer has not updated their report to their investors on this fact.

    Pfizer would have use vaccinate 28 million children on one months’ safety data and a study that was not large enough to detect even a well-recognized serious adverse event.

  1. “Zero deaths and serious adverse events from COVID-19 vaccines.

The world knows about myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination, and we have known about it for some time. In June 2021, Tom Shimabukuro gave a presentation to ACIP, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This was a key meeting at which ACIP would vote to recommend or not recommend that COVID-19 vaccine for teens.

Shimabukuro reviewed data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink – the VSD – a taxpayer-subsidized resource to which only a handful of people are allowed to have unrestricted access. In those data, he reported zero (0) serious adverse events and zero (0) deaths from the COVID-19 vaccines in the United States.

See: Shimabukuro, T. 2021. COVID-19 Vaccine safety updates Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) June 23, 2021

Shimabukuro’s presentation followed a review of myocarditis and pericarditis by a CDC employee, who, in the Q&A, reported that the signal of increased risk of myocarditis in males relative to females in older children (teens) and also in younger children.

In his presentation, Shimabukuro made a point on one slide to highlight myocarditis:

It will be important to know whether Shimabukuro used the CDC’s twisted definition of “Fully Vaccinated”. If he did, then all of the events following the receipt of the first dose and those following the second dose on days 0-13 did not count as occurring in the vaccinated, which would be absolutely misleading.

Two days later, FDA issued a warning on myocarditis and pericarditis risk in male teens following COVID-19 vaccination in spite of Shimabukuro’s presentation. The signal for myocarditis has been established reproducibly by independent analysts. This demonstrates at the very least that VSD – and Dr. Shimabukuro – do not provide “Pharmacovigilance”.

Throughout his presentation, Shimabukuro uses the euphemism “immunization”, showing a lack of knowledge on the fact that “exposure to vaccine” does not equal “immune”, especially in this setting with a rapidly evolving mRNA virus.

In his discussion of VAERS data, Shimabukuro reminds the attendees that “a report to VAERS does not necessarily mean that the vaccine has caused a health problem”, but he failed to also report that “This caveat does not mean that the vaccine has not caused a health problem”.

Data from Ontario, Canada show an increase in myocarditis over time – increases from baseline – as vaccination increased over time – a population-level dose-dependent response not expected unless causality was in play.

These data show a range of rates of myocarditis trending toward 20 per hundred thousand. Shimabukuro’s reported his rate estimates at 7 per million. I stand by my conclusion that we do not have anything close to vaccine safety monitoring in the United States.

See: mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination and Development of CMR-confirmed Myopericarditis, https://archive.md/pvggn

Shimabukuro’s analysis of myocarditis using VAERS used data up to June 11, 2021. The VAERS analysis separated results following dose 1 and dose 2; the results consistently showed increased risk with the second dose, again, indicative of causality and perhaps pathogenic priming.

Evidently, those reporting to VAERS did not get the memo that those suffering myocarditis following exposure to vaccination should not be considered vaccinated until five weeks after their initial dose.

Conclusions

In the NVICP, causality determination often requires adverse events or deaths following a vaccine to be observed within 8 weeks of the receipt of the vaccine (often using rates beyond 8 weeks as a baseline, which can be higher than the national baseline rates, making that practice also bogus). To delay designation of a vaccinated person as “vaccinated” until up to five weeks after the initial dose is a brazen statistical manipulation to bury perception of adverse events and deaths from COVID-19 vaccination. It is a shameful practice and must not only be stopped: its effects must be reversed.

The public deserves to see efficacy re-calculated, as well as all rates of break-through cases, rates of reinfection cases, and new case rates all reported assuming that the individuals who have been exposed to COVID-19 vaccines, even a single dose, are “vaccinated”. Otherwise, the effect of the vaccine itself is never actually studied, and the relative risk of COVID-19 diagnosis in the vaccine-exposed and the vaccine-unexposed will never be known.

Now that boosters are here, no one may ever be counted as “fully vaccinated”. This sick, twisted perversion of logic and reason does not jive with reality, and people are going to get hurt needlessly. With draconian policies putting people’s jobs on the line, their very livelihood, this is far, far more than risk of vaccine injury or death. The definition of groups being studied must be changed to “vaccine exposed” and “vaccine naive”.

If the negative efficacy estimate from the data from the Barnstable report holds, then new breakthrough cases combined with the expected surge in “cases” due to false positives in the millions who may opt to be tested instead of vaccinating will lead to a fifth surge in COVID-19 that dwarfs the peak of the pandemic. The US will have more new “cases” of COVID-19 than the rest of the world combined… that will be a sure sign that something is truly rotten in the United States of America.

_________________

https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/10/23/new-study-proves-the-vaccinated-are-dragging-out-the-pandemic.aspx

New Study Proves the Vaccinated Are Dragging Out the Pandemic

October 23, 2021

A leaked Department of Defense slide show presentation that was quickly removed from the internet, but has been preserved in archives and on private websites shows that the shots are not meeting experts’ expectations.

Using hospitalization records from 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries who were fully “vaccinated”, the researchers found that 148,000 fully “vaccinated” individuals age 65 and older came down with COVID anyway; 30,000 were hospitalized in an intensive care unit and 9,400 were admitted to an intensive care unit. The death rate was 2.2%.

In the slide show, authors point out that the vaccine effectiveness against infection and hospitalization “is lower than reported in smaller studies.” Specifically, using metrics showing that 80% of persons over age 65 as “vaccinated”, “73% of COVID-19 cases occurred in fully vaccinated individuals.”

Not only that, according to Slide 8:

“Breakthrough infection rates five to six months post vaccination are twice as high as three to four months post vaccination.” The waning immunity was observed in both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna shots.

And — contrary to “official” reports in the media — Slide 12 says it was the “VACCINATED” driving the high infection numbers during the summer of 2021, as “61% of COVID-19 of COVID-19 hospitalizations occurred in fully ‘vaccinated’ individuals in the week of July 24 alone.

The study concluded that the jabs are more effective at preventing hospitalization than infection, and that  “prior COVID-19 infection has a major protective effect against breakthrough hospitalization.” The study was done by the Defense Department’s Project Salus.

SOURCES:

Wayback Archives September 21, 2021

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Big Pharma Payola Scandal Erupts in Australia, Takes Down Six Corrupt Officials & Australian Premier. Millions of Americans Getting Fired For Not Getting a Jab That’s 3% Effective

https://www.pharmaceuticalfraud.com/2021-10-06-big-pharma-scandal-australia-berejiklian-covid-scam.

Big Pharma payola scandal erupts in Australia, takes down six corrupt officials and Australian Premier Berejiklian

10/06/2021 / By Ethan Huff

More than half a dozen staff members of New South Wales, Australia Premier Gladys Berejiklian have resigned in shame over their involvement in a massive Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) bribery scheme.

Berejiklian and her comrades reportedly took tens of millions of dollars from Big Pharma in exchange for pushing lockdowns and now “vaccines,” destroying countless lives and businesses in the process.

According to a former Australian member of parliament (MP), Pfizer and AstraZeneca both paid lobbyists to push vaccine mandates on the people, ensuring a steady stream of ill-gotten profits. (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

The plot thickens.

Berejiklian was given a deal that she’d get off scot-free by issuing a”vaccine” mandate, which she allegedly accepted. It took a watchdog group looking into her “alleged misconduct,” to cause her to resign. Her deputy premier also resigned along with a cabinet minister and numerous parliament members.

The article states this scandal is likely only the tip of the iceberg with more sure to follow.

Important excerpt:

With these two Branch Covidians gone, New South Wales (NSW) is said to be in a state of “political disarray and chaos.” Many are wondering what will happen next, and how soon the region might be able to reach “post-Covid freedom.”

We the People must push for every last covid criminal to either resign or be removed – no exceptions.

The shock-wave of resignations that are likely coming can be found at Collapse.news.

__________________

https://www.informationliberation.com/?id=62617

Millions Of Americans Are Getting Fired For Not Taking A Jab That’s Now 3% Effective

Chris Menahan
InformationLiberation
Oct. 19, 2021

CNN is reporting that a new study involving over 600,000 veterans has found that Johnson & Johnson’s covid vaccine’s protection “fell from 88% in March to 3% in August.” (See link for article)

____________________

Important excerpt:

On the flip side, we know from another Israeli study that “vaccinated individuals had 27 times higher risk of symptomatic COVID infection compared to those with natural immunity from prior COVID disease,” as epidemiologist Martin Kulldorff noted.

The article states that data shows natural immunity is now more than 100 times more effective than the J&J shot, yet the government and businesses continue to deny it.

The “needle in every arm” mantra has drowned out the truth of natural immunity and the fact there are effective, safe, cheap treatments for COVID.

A recent study out of Israel showed:

  • recovered patients with natural immunity are 13 times less likely to be infected than those who have Pfizer jabs
  • those who were double jabbed were 5.96 times more likely to be infected and 7.13 times more likely to experience symptoms than those with natural immunity after recovery

The data is in and it is clear: natural immunity is best, the jabs are unnecessary, ineffective, dangerous, poisonous and have caused a 46-fold increase in vaccine-related deaths.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

In Major Shift, NIH Admits Funding Risky Virus Research in Wuhan

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2021/10/nih-admits-funding-risky-virus-research-in-wuhan

In Major Shift, NIH Admits Funding Risky Virus Research in Wuhan

A spokesman for Dr. Fauci says he has been “entirely truthful,” but a new letter belatedly acknowledging the National Institutes of Health’s support for virus-enhancing research adds more heat to the ongoing debate over whether a lab leak could have sparked the pandemic.

By Katherine Eban

Anthony Fauci director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases on April 13 2021. U.S.nbsp
Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases on April 13, 2021. U.S. Photograph by Leigh Vogel / UPI / Bloomberg / Getty Images.

Excerpts of article:

On Wednesday, the NIH sent a letter to members of the House Committee on Energy and Commerce that acknowledged two facts.

  1. EcoHealth Alliance, a New York City–based nonprofit that partners with far-flung laboratories to research and prevent the outbreak of emerging diseases, did indeed enhance a bat coronavirus to become potentially more infectious to humans, which the NIH letter described as an “unexpected result” of the research it funded that was carried out in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
  2. EcoHealth Alliance violated the terms of its grant conditions stipulating that it had to report if its research increased the viral growth of a pathogen by tenfold.

“It’s just another chapter in a sad tale of inadequate oversight, disregard for risk, and insensitivity to the importance of transparency,” said Stanford microbiologist Dr. David Relman. “Given all of the sensitivity about this work, it’s difficult to understand why NIH and EcoHealth have still not explained a number of irregularities with the reporting on this grant.”

(See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

The article points out the 900 pages obtained and subsequently published due to a FIOA lawsuit against the NIH which was still missing a document – the fifth and final progress report.

In Wednesday’s NIH letter, that missing progress report, which was dated August 2021 was finally included. That report described a “limited experiment,” as the NIH letter phrased it, in which laboratory mice infected with an altered virus became “sicker than those infected with” a naturally occurring one.

While career politicians continue to banter over definitions, people continue to get sick and even die, and a dangerous, unproven experimental gene therapy is being forced upon the populace – due to an intentional experiment that was released either intentionally or accidentally upon the public. Further, these same powerful people and organizations are censoring and banning treatments that would prevent a large portion of these deaths.  Their feet must be continually held to the fire.

Fauci’s spokesperson tries to weasel him out of it by stating the NIH funded experiments, “were not reasonably expected to increase transmissibility or virulence in humans.”

Oh, well now, that changes everything.  Not!

Wow.  I might expect this from a 10 year old, but not from the highest paid federal employee charged with protecting the entire nation’s (and in some sense – the world’s) public health.  This is yet another example that the nation’s health leader is either entirely deluded or evil.

The article further drives the nail into the coffin by reminding the reader of the findings of DRASTIC, a group of internet sleuths who released a leaked $14 million grant proposal that EcoHealth Alliance had submitted in 2018 to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).  The grant included the partnership between EcoHealth and the Wuhan lab for purposely constructing SARS-related bat coronaviruses that would be inserted with “human-specific cleavage sites” to “evaluate growth potential” of pathogens.  What’s crucial here is the furin cleavage site that makes the virus more infectious by allowing it to easily enter human cells – exactly what allowed the COVID ‘pandemic’ to occur.  Without this laboratory contrived capability humans would not become infected.

Although DARPA rejected the grant proposal, the former executive vice president of the Asia Society who sits on the WHO’s advisory committee on human genome editing simply but effectually states the following:

“If I applied for funding to paint Central Park purple and was denied, but then a year later we woke up to find Central Park painted purple, I’d be a prime suspect,”Jamie Metzl

Bingo.  Couldn’t have said it better.

Lastly, Fauci’s been accused of funding Frankenstein research grafting aborted babies’ body parts to mice to grow hair and organs, as well as ‘cruel’ puppy experiments where the NIH shipped part of a $375,800 grant to a lab in Tunisia to drug beagles and lock their heads in mesh cages filled with hungry sand flies so that the insects could eat them alive.

Mainstream media continually focuses on political party affiliation to divide the nation.  Don’t fall for it.  Right is right and wrong is wrong and truth is important.

http://

Utterly disgusting’: Fauci caught up in ‘cruel’ experiments on puppies

Oct. 23, 2021

Sky News, Australia

Bipartisan legislators are calling on Dr Anthony Fauci for answers about “cruel” puppy experiments, according to Sky News host Rita Panahi.  The Hill reports answers have been demanded from Dr Fauci over a grant sent from the National Institutes of Health to a lab in Tunisia where it is alleged dozens of beagles were infected with “disease-causing parasites to test an experimental drug on them”.

“This is stuff is sick,” Ms Panahi said.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

COVID Coincidence & Stop Unique Patient ID

https://marilynsingletonmdjd.com/2021/10/12/covid-coincidence

By Marilyn M. Singleton, MD, JD – https://marilynsingletonmdjd.com/

“They” say there is no such thing as coincidence. They must have known about Covid-19, the political viral disease.

Is it a coincidence that the year of the Covid is also the year that scientific integrity died? Discourse is the lifeblood of science. I thought we had gotten past jailing or guillotining or dismissing as crackpots people whose scientific theories with which we disagreed. Many scientific mavericks were vilified: William Harvey describing the circulatory system, Ignaz Semmelweis’ advocating for simple hand-washing, Barry Marshall determining that H. pylori, not spicy foods caused peptic ulcers, to name a few. We have a modern day version of public humiliation and worse. Data that does not fit the “official story” is removed from popular social media sites, not reported on mainstream television channels, and hidden from easily accessed public websites.

Was it a coincidence that an all-out campaign to debunk the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine as an early treatment for Covid-19 occurred after President Trump had good words to say about it in an election year? The denigration was relentless, despite 60 years of use in autoimmune diseases for its anti-inflammatory effects. Hydroxychloroquine was also found to have anti-blood clot effects. And with several viruses it was shown to inhibit viral entry into cells and viral replication. All of these properties would be effective in treating Covid-19 symptoms.

Another anti-parasitic medication, ivermectin, has 20 possible mechanisms of action against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, including interrupting viral entry into cells and anti-inflammatory action. Significantly, ivermectin is a protease inhibitor, that is, a substance that blocks proteins that allow viruses to reproduce themselves.

Is it a coincidence that Pfizer’s new anti-Covid pill, PF-07321332 is also a protease inhibitor? Notably, Pfizer’s drug would have to be given early after the onset Covid symptoms. This is also the recommendation for hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin—a recommendation that many studies ignored when dismissing the value of these anti-parasitic medications.

Is it a coincidence that Merck, who distributes ivermectin, is seeking fast-track approval for molnupiravir, an antiviral agent to treat Covid-19? How convenient that the U.S. government will purchase $1.2 billion worth of the yet-to-be-approved drug. And how predictable that vaccine maker Moderna’s stock fell 11 percent after the announcement. Vaccines are yesterday’s cash cow. Is it a coincidence that ivermectin costs no more than $100 dollars per treatment course and molnupirivir costs $700 per 10-day course of treatment?

Is it a coincidence that the pharmaceutical and health products industry, to keep their seat at the table, has spent $171,262,239 so far this year in lobbying and that Pfizer and Merck were among the top five clients?

Is it a coincidence that Dr. Fauci, in dismissing hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, resurrected his same excuses for not using a drug that frontline physicians found effective for AIDS patients? Physicians begged Dr. Fauci to publicize the use of the sulfa drug, Bactrim, as prevention and treatment for PCP (Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia) in AIDS patients. According to investigative author Sean Strub, “Fauci refused to acknowledge the evidence and … even encouraged people with AIDS to stop taking treatments, like Bactrim, that weren’t specifically approved for use in people with AIDS.” Dr. Fauci told activists there was “no data to suggest PCP prophylaxis was beneficial and that it may, in fact be dangerous.” Thousands of deaths could have been avoided. This sounds chillingly familiar to his position on Covid treatments. Damn the clinical success. I don’t care if the drugs work; I’m waiting for my pet drugs with high price tags!

Is it a coincidence that Dr. Fauci’s personal favorite AIDS drug, AZT (zidovudine), was ramrodded through the FDA? And that it was toxic, didn’t work, and in fact killed people, like his favorite anti-Covid drug, remdesivir? Remdesivir’s toxic effects were known when it was tested against Ebola virus disease in 2019. By April 2020, it was known that 60 percent of Covid patients given remdesivir had adverse effects, including liver and kidney injury. Worse yet, remdesivir did not improve survival. Indeed, a few months later the World Health Organization recommended against its use, but Fauci’s National Institutes of Health (NIH) still has it on its treatment protocol at $3,120 per treatment course.

I have a broader question about why diversity of thought is squelched. Tyrants despise free thinkers. It is not coincidence that President Biden, who wants to exert more federal government control over our lives through vaccine mandates, bought all of Regeneron’s monoclonal antibody treatments that were not in short supply but were being successfully used by “red states.” He vowed that “if governors won’t help us beat the pandemic, I’ll use my power as president to get them out of the way.”

Health and Human Services framed the sequestration more kindly: “This system will help maintain equitable distribution, both geographically and temporally, across the country.” Is it a coincidence that “governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods” sounds like socialism?

We Demand Privacy of Personal Medical Records: Say NO To National Patient ID

Organizations like AAPS and Citizens’ Council for Health Freedom (CCHF) have for decades helped protect our medical privacy by successfully blocking the implementation of a national patient ID. But their efforts are at grave risk of being reversed.

Lyme/MSIDS patients are in grave danger if medical records are not kept private.  Due to a misunderstood illness that can cause all sorts of neurological, psychiatric, and mental problems, patients are often misunderstood, misdiagnosed, and labeled – when they have a serious underlying issue – serious infections.  These labels and the revelation of personal, medical information could have dire consequences affecting their livelihoods and futures.

Here is how CCHF explains it:

Democrat leadership in the House and Senate, working on the 2022 appropriations bill, have REMOVED the longstanding prohibition on funding the development of a Unique Patient ID (UPI) for all Americans.

This national patient tracking number (National Patient ID) was part of HillaryCare and became law in 1996 as part of HIPAA, but its creation and implementation have regularly been stopped by the efforts of Congressman Ron Paul, and now U.S. Senator Rand Paul who’ve made sure almost every appropriations bill since 1996 has prohibited funding for its creation. In 2019, CCHF’s efforts, including a letter signed by 44 other organizations [including AAPS], convinced the Republican controlled U.S. Senate to keep the ban in place.

Your help is needed ASAP! Tell your Members of Congress in the House and Senate:

“STOP THE UNIQUE PATIENT ID — Put the UPI ban back into the Appropriations bill.”

Get your message on the way to Congress in a couple short clicks at:https://p2a.co/0CzCue5
Thank you for speaking out. Your voice makes a difference.

https://p2a.co/0CzCue5  Go here to get a message to Congress

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

‘Medical Freedom is Worth Everything to Me’: Short Film

https://films.aflds.org/films/halcomb  Video Here (Approx. 6 Min)

“Saving Lives”

Frontline Films

All three Halcombs survived COVID, including a 95 year old.  How? Watch the short video and learn about the life-saving medications that our corrupt public ‘health’ authorities and complicit media are censoring, maligning and denying.

There is complete polarization within the medical community reminiscent of Lyme/MSIDS regarding the treatment of COVID. On one hand you have mainstream doctors toeing the accepted narrative either out of ignorance, or out of fear of losing their jobs.  On the other hand you have freedom-loving doctors who are putting their necks on the chopping block as they defy the establishment and advocate for the proper treatment of patients.  The story is one Lyme/MSIDS patients know all too well.

Science and science journals have been completely compromised and are bought-out by Big Pharma.

Lyme/MSIDS patients quickly learn of the Lyme-underground where one must go in order to get appropriate help.  Now, a wider public circle is learning what we’ve contended with for over 40 years: having to go to search out “special” doctors to receive “appropriate” treatment. Hospitals have become modern day “killing fields,” with frustrated doctors splitting off forming groups separate from mainstream medicine. These brave doctors are being attacked and threatened.  Politicians and judges are now being asked to speak up for sick patients who seemingly have no recourse.

To say we are in a mess would be an understatement. The vitriol is tangible and the public is confused and being led astray – even blaming people for not succumbing to an unproven, experimental gene therapy injection utilizing a dangerous spike protein toxin which is related to thousands upon thousands of deaths, severe adverse reactions, and pathogenic priming or ADE, all of which are completely ignored by mainstream medicine and a complicit media.  One expert warns these dangerous injections may kill up to 50 million Americans.  Whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork with crucial information:

  • CDC whistleblower lawsuit states nearly 50,000 people were killed within 14 days of a 1st or 2nd dose of a COVID-19 “vaccine”.  Deaths are severely under counted as the corrupt CDC is counting deaths within 14 days of vaccination, as unvaccinated deaths.  These statistical shennanigans have been used throughout the “plandemic” to push an accepted narrative while hiding reality. The CDC did a similar thing with the PCR test.
  • Pfizer whistleblower states the injections are bioweapons.
  • GSK whistleblower states the injections cause sterility.
  • Vaccine researcher admits the spike protein is a toxin that accumulates in the ovaries, testes, liver, spleen, bone marrow, and adrenal glands. It also crosses the blood brain barrier.
  • Vaccine expert states COVID injections drive viral mutations which will cause outbreaks.
  • Doctor testing “vaxxed” blood found COVID shots cause severe autoimmunity.
  • Pfizer scientist admits natural immunity is better than COVID shots.
  • Pfizer whistleblower reveals internal emails purposely covering up fetal cell information.
  • Medical practitioner whistleblowers admit COVID shots kill more than they save.
  • COVID injections “cause more harm than good” based on the proper scientific endpoint of “all cause severe morbidity.”
  • Microscopy is revealing graphene, metals, parasites, “mysterious discs” and living, moving “creatures” or “objects” that look and act like “Hydra Vulgaris” inside the COVID shots.
  • Doctors testing “vaxxed” blood show microclotting and other bizarre changes in the blood.
  • COVID injections are fueling mutations, causing “break-through” infections which cause more severe illness including hospitalization and death, when exposed to COVID mutations.
  • CDC continues to manipulate data to create a pandemic of the unvaccinated, and to falsely state the shots are “safe and effective,” to push their lucrative COVID shots, which they have patents on.
  • Big Tech, Big Pharma, social media, and a complicit media continue to censor reality and the fact the injections are causing severe adverse events including death and that there is no need for these dangerous injections due to safe, effective, cheap COVID treatments that have been proven to work. There were more than 500 deaths in the first year of remdesivir usage – the drug of choice by our corrupt health ‘authorities,’ vs 20 deaths in 19 years of ivermectin usage – the drug of choice from censored, maligned doctors.  Remdesivir isn’t effective for COVID, but is manufactured by Gilead Science, a CA manufacturing company which has ties to the Pentagon and has been accused of engaging in illegal bioweapon research programs in the country of Georgia. More than 100,000 pages of classified information shows that Gilead was involved in conducting military research, biological weapons research, and other clinical experiments there that resulted in the deaths of Georgian citizens.

Category:

Treatment, vaccines, Viruses