By David John Sorensen and Dr. Vladimir Zelenko, MD
September, 2021
Version 1.0
THE VACCINE DEATHREPORT
Evidenceof millions of deaths and seriousadverse eventsresulting from the experimental COVID–19 injections
P U R P O S E The purpose of this report is to documenthowall over the world millions of people have died, and hundreds of millions of serious adverse events have occurred,after injections with the experimental mRNAgene therapy.We also reveal the real risk of an unprecedented genocide. F A C T S Our aim is to only present solidfacts, and stay away from unfounded claims. The data is clear and verifiable. References can be found with allpresented information, which is providedas a starting point for further investigation. C O M P L I C I T Y The data showsthat we arecurrently witnessing the greatest organized mass murder in the history of our world. The severity of this situation compels us to ask this criticalquestion: will werise up to the defense of billions of innocent people? Or will wepermitpersonal profit over justice, and becomplicit? Networks of lawyers all over the worldarepreparing class action lawsuits to prosecute all who are serving thiscriminal agenda. Hundreds of millions of people worldwide are rising up against this criminal operation. To all who have been complicit so far, we say: Thereis still time to turn and choose the side of truth.Please make the right choice.
W O R L D W I D E Although this report focuses on the situation in the United States, it also applies to the restof the world, as the same type of experimental injections with similar death rates –and comparable systems of corruption to hide these numbers –are used worldwide. Therefore we encourage everyone around the world to share this report. May itbe a wake up call for all of humanity.
Please listen to this extremely important podcast where Dr. Jane Ruby explains that embalmers are finding white, fibrous substances in the vaxxed. Scroll to 9:00 for details and pictures.
Dr. Zandre Botha was shocked after studying the blood of “vaccinated” patients that were coming to her with serious illness after being injected with the shots being called “Covid vaccines”.
At 15:30 she states that after attending “vaxxed” patients and handling their blood she didn’t feel well and has experienced hormonal symptoms, anxiety, as well as a feeling that her brain was shaking. Other doctors have told her they too struggled with similar symptoms after treating patients who have gotten the COVID shots.
At 16:50 she discusses things that have helped her“vaxxed” patients as well as herself (zeolite, NAC, glutathione, ozone, molecular hydrogen).
Recently I posted Dr. Carrie Madej’s microscopy findings on the COVID shots that showed graphene-like substances, metals, and a “creature” or “object” that experts state looks and acts like “Hydra Vulgaris,” a fresh-water polyp with 4-12 tentacles.
She states the creature in the vials “acted self aware” and was able to lift itself off the glass slide.
This type of hydra is used in genomic and transhumanism research for morphalactic regeneration because they reproduce quickly either through sexual reproducing, budding, or indirectly through regeneration, making them biologically immortal.
In 2018 UC Davis received a 1.5 million grant from the government to make hydra a better model for studying regeneration, and more recently received a $1 million Keck Foundation grant to advance the team’s synthetic neurobiology effort to define the connections between neurons and muscles that drive programmed behaviors in living animals. The article title states it’s research to “build a brain.”
The value, in this case, is the potential to break existing connections and create new ones, which could be used to engineer new behaviors.
The evidence of intelligent self-assembly of nanotechnology and intelligent filament-movement is an indicator of synthetic biology and nanobioelectronics, as per several scientific papers published in various journals, and points to the stealth inclusion of Graphene Oxide in the Moderna vaccine for electromagnetic manipulation of cells and neurons via the creation of synthetic neural networks in the human body and brain. This is a clear sign of malfeasance and intended transhumanizing and cyborgizing of the human body through the COVID vaccines.
It must be remembered that both Pfizer and Moderna developed the Transhumanist mRNA vaccines for DARPA, on DARPA contracts from 2013. Pfizer and Moderna’s military connections as well as the mRNA connections with DARPA’s Regina Dugan now directing the Wellcome LEAP ventures and DARPA’s Dan Wattendorf now at the Gates Foundation were discussed here earlier. DARPA’s “Pandemic Prevention Platforms” and ADEPT diagnostic and monitoring platforms are based on bioengineering, gene manipulation, and synthetic biology. These human-takeover programs envision an infinite future of mRNA vaccines and external control of the human body and brain, which Graphene Oxide would permit. Source
Graphene Oxide nanoparticles have been found by electron microscopy and spectroscopy, among other techniques to be in the COVID PCR and antigen testing swabs, masks, and injections.
Recently someone translated the Spanish study, “Nanotechnological Investigations on COVID-9 Vaccines: Detection of Toxic Nanoparticles of Graphene Oxide and Heavy Metals,” into English. Spanish version here: informe-es(1)
During the weekly “Ask Dr. Jane” segment on “The Stew Peters Show”, Dr. Jane Ruby revealed a breaking development, and a deeper look into the findings of Dr. Zandre Botha, who previously exposed never-before-seen images of the contents of the “vaccine” vials.
The question begging to be asked is what are these discs carrying?
Earlier in September, Joe Biden took to national television to rail at unvaccinated Americans and blame them for the lingering COVID-19 pandemic.
Biden then went on to drop a bomb: He said his government would mandate that employers with more than 100 on staff would be required to force them to get the jab or else face a massive fine.
(See link for article)
__________________
Watch Sharyl Attkison on Full Measure for a 9 minute report on the “vaccine” mandate.
**Comment**
Biden stated that the “vaccinated” workers need to be protected from unvaccinated co-workers – a complete myth as the jabs don’t protect you at all and in fact set you up for more severe illness with other mutations.
OSHA, is responsible for issuing the rule, but a new report suggests that rule is not forthcoming and may never be issued at all.It was all a big, fat bluff, to get more people jabbed, and many spineless corporations have already rolled over all on their own.
The Dept. of Labor website and the OSHA information portal has no mention of the mandate at all. (See link for article)
If it hasn’t been published, then there is no mandate.
If there is no mandate yet, then obviously, none of the companies are under any obligation to enforce it.
OSHA is apparently the federal agency responsible for framing a set of regulations for the mandate, including fines. But federal agencies only construct regulations after a law has been passed or an EO is issued.
If I’m correct, and no EO has been published, we have an odd situation, to say the least.
Governors and lawyers have been threatening to sue, because the EO is unconstitutional and overrides state powers. But if there is no Presidential EO, then all these legal cases would be meaningless, because, again, there is no official mandate.
Is the White House stalling? Do they realize the EO and the mandate will be overturned in court? Are they hoping to achieve corporate compliance without an official mandate?
I’ve queried several lawyers. One suggested that so far, in this situation, the feds are mandating by bluffing.
That indeed would be extraordinary.
Maybe the EO is forthcoming as we speak. Possibly (though I can’t imagine it), it’s been published somewhere other than the Federal Register. But until it’s visible and official, there is no private-sector mandate.
Unless speeches and press releases and media coverage suddenly, all by themselves, have the force of law.
__________________
EO?
EeeOh?
Eee-eye-eee-eye…oh?
Recently the FDA supposedly “approved” the COVID jab, yet it didn’t,not really. It approved something that isn’t obtainable in the U.S.
The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product, and now it appears they are bluffing to boot.
More on the missing Biden EO and the missing vaccine mandate
by Jon Rappoport
Yesterday, I wrote that there is no Biden Executive Order mandating the vaccine for all companies with more than 100 employees.
Several readers have mistakenly pointed to the EO that mandates the COVID vaccine for federal employees, federal contractors, and (now) sub-contractors. That’s NOT the EO I’m talking about.
Now I’ve learned that, apparently, Biden (his handlers) are pursuing a different strategy to mandate the vaccine for all employees of companies whose work force is more than 100.
Biden has issued a directive to the federal agency, OSHA, ordering it to frame a set of regulations that would, indeed, compel private sector companies with more than 100 employees to mandate the vaccine to those employees.
This Biden directive is operating under what’s called an ETS—Emergency Temporary Standard.
Three things to understand here, in my opinion.
ONE: Since OSHA has not yet issued any regulations, there is no binding legal reason, at the moment, for private-sector employers with more than 100 employees to mandate the vaccine to those employees. Unless those employers are federal contractors.
TWO: As I suggested yesterday, this whole operation smells like a stall on the part of the feds. The stall is already occurring, since OSHA hasn’t issued any regulations, and it will continue after OSHA acts, as various state governments and other parties file legal actions against the government.
Meanwhile, on the ground, companies are folding up and following Biden’s “decree.” They’re falling in line. This fait accompli is exactly what the White House wants.
Legal challenges to the OSHA ETS could take months, even years. If enough companies voluntarily go along with the decree, the feds will win.
The feds aren’t looking for 100% compliance. The mechanics of enforcement alone could be a logistical nightmare. The feds just want MORE. More compliance. More employers ordering their people to take the shot. More needles in arms. More fascism. More tyranny. More power. More control.
THREE: It seems to me that not issuing an EO, and instead going the OSHA ETS route, is less direct, more muddy, and easier to wrangle about in court for a longer period of time. Which is what the feds want.
Meanwhile, back in the every-day world…back under the rule of the medical cartel…the beat goes on. And what is that beat?
For the past 30-plus years, I’ve been revealing, chapter and verse, the devastating effects of pharmaceutical medicine. The huge numbers of deaths, the huge numbers of maimings.
The overall result of this program is the massive debilitation of the population.
In other words, the gross weakening of health and vitality, which translates into the lowered ability to resist the power of the State.
This is fact. This is outcome. This is what, under the surface of society, has been happening for decades and decades.
And now, in the US alone, reported COVID vaccine injuries have surpassed 700,000. This figure is patently false, meaning it represents underreporting. For example, the well-known Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare study concluded that reported vaccine injuries should be multiplied by 100 to arrive at a true number.
It’s long past the time when any doctor, nurse, or public health official can claim they’re unaware of the destruction pharmaceutical medicine is causing. They WANT TO be “unaware.” They WANT TO turn a blind eye. They WANT TO keep their jobs, paychecks, reputations, and status.
So, with that, I’ve republished my piece citing mainstream revelations that detail the amount of human devastation the medical cartel has been creating, for a long time. Consider the possibility that, for the moment, I’m the New York Times which has inexplicably received a heavy shot of Truth Serum.
Scientists have isolated a new orthonairovirus from two patients showing acute febrile illness with thrombocytopenia and leukopenia after tick bite in Hokkaido, Japan.
Transmission electron microscopy of YEZV particles negatively stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid. Image credit: Kodama et al., doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25857-0.
They cause sometimes fatal febrile illnesses in humans and other animals.
Of 15 species within the genus, four species comprise known human pathogens:
Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus
Nairobi sheep disease virus
Dugbe virus
Kasokero virus
The newly-discovered orthonairovirus, named Yezo virus (YEZV), is the causative agent of an acute febrile illness characterized by thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and elevation of liver enzymes and ferritin.
“At least seven people have been infected with this new virus in Japan since 2014,” said Dr. Keita Matsuno, a virologist in the International Institute for Zoonosis Control at Hokkaido University.
The Yezo virus was discovered after a 41-year-old man was admitted to the hospital in 2019 with fever and leg pain after being bitten by an arthropod believed to be a tick. (See link for article)
__________________
Highlights:
Patient also had gait disturbance, and appetite loss
A second patient had similar symptoms
Genetic analysis of blood samples showed a virus closely related to Sulina virus and Tamdy virus, detected in Romania and Uzbekistan, respectively.
They found antibodies in local deer, raccoons, and the RNA in 3 major species of ticks
Researchers state it’s highly likely that the virus causes illness when transmitted via ticks
The team’s paper was published in the journal Nature Communications
_____
F. Kodama et al. 2021. A novel nairovirus associated with acute febrile illness in Hokkaido, Japan. Nat Commun 12, 5539; doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25857-0
Natural vs. Vaccine Immunity: Does the COVID-19 Vaccine Wipe Out Natural Immunity?
Del Bigtree and The Highwire Team Noticed an Important Discrepancy Between Public Health Claims and Science that You Need to Know About. Plus: What’s Happening with Memory B-Cells?
One study shows durable and long-lasting active Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies following natural infection. Another shows loss of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in people with prior infection following vaccination. Del Bigtree and The Highwire Team pointed this out in their latest episode – and it’s worth a closer look.
My friends at the Highwire routinely find disparities between public health policy (the “national narrative”, as Del calls it) and science. In their last episode, they showed a mopish Anthony Fauci admit that natural immunity might mean no vaccine for some – and Faucing admitting that he did not have an answer to the question posed by a surprisingly and refreshingly frank Sanjay Gupta. I nearly fell out of my chair the first time I saw this specific interview – Anthony Fauci admitting that he didn’t know something, in and of itself, is noteworthy.
Bigtree then reviews the results of two different studies, which, taken together, do not bode well for COVID-19 vaccine recommendations for the convalescent. The first found “durable and robust” immunity up to 250 days in people who had COVID-19 – a study of which Fauci should have been aware. That study, by Cohen et al., published in Cell Reports, as reviewed by Precision Vaccinations:
“This new study shows that most convalescent COVID-19 patients mount durable antibodies, B cells, and T cells specific for SARS-CoV-2 up to 250 days. The kinetics of these responses provide an early indication for a favorable course ahead to achieve long-lived immunity.”
“Of the 183 individuals for whom longitudinal neutralization titers were assayed, 140 (77%) had at least one time point with neutralization titers above the limit of detection (> 20). Seventy-five percent (43/57) of COVID-19 patients generated serum neutralizing antibodies between 30–50 days after symptom onset and similarly 72% (48/67) had measurable titers between 180–263 days after symptom onset.”
So, “efficacy” of natural immunity is 77%; of those 77%, 72% had durable, long-lived neutralizing antibodies of at least 180 and up to 263 days. Note that 72% of 77% is 55.4%. So long-term neutralizing Ab – type immunity from natural infection is 55.4% in the infected, according to this study. Note also that the study looked at Spike, RBD and NTD proteins, and that the two mRNA vaccines in use in the US only target the Spike protein.
The Highwire team pointed out that these results are in stark contrast to the loss of immunity reported in another study, by the Canaday et al. team, which looked at older vs. younger people who had prior COVID-19 infection. Specifically, they examined the effects of vaccination on Spike and RBD neutralizing antibodies in those with natural immunity due to prior COVID-19 who were young healthcare workers with prior infection, (“control group”), and the older NH resident group w/prior infection. The Canaday et al. study found evidence of active Ab immunity at 180 days post-vaccination in the convalescent at rates of only 19% and 35%, respectively.
The comparison of 55.4% (Cohen et al., unvaccinated following COVID-19) to 19% and 35% (Canaday et al., vaccinated following COVID-19) is unexpected and, to put it mildly, worth noting.
It’s worrisome that vaccination appears to deplete neutralizing Abs against the Spike protein gained by infection. It’s puzzling that vaccination appears also to deplete neutralizing Abs against the RBD (receptor-binding-domain) SARS-CoV-2 protein because the vaccines do not target that protein.
A caveat: We have insufficient information on the rates of exposure-produced antibodies in the unvaccinated, vaccine-naive COVID-19 convalescent population compared to vaccine-naive COVID-19 patients who were vaccinated. That would require a human challenge trial, which I think is highly unethical. But it’s unethical to NOT do the animal trials and just presume that people who have previously had COVID-19 can, and should, be vaccinated, given the state of the science on the question. Such studies should use ferrets – and they should look for evidence of disease enhancement and original antigenic sin anew, especially given that the virus has evolved to escape current vaccines.
What About Memory Cells?
It’s also worth noting that T- and B-cell memory immunity were not considered by the latter study – and they are the more important type of immunity when it comes to the question of durability.
Take, for example, an article reviewing available data on immunological decay by Cromer et al.:
Key to understanding natural vs. vaccine immunity is the fate not only of Abs, but of memory cells.
This figure from Cromer et al. may be the most important figure on the matter to date:
The little subfigure in the upper right that shows INCREASES in Memory B-cells – all trending toward 100% of patients – across different studies – proves that we have the ability to store long-term information in our immune systems against the SARS-CoV-2 proteins measured. That’s great news!
We know from other studies that there is a minor, and now we know, temporary “boost” in Ab production in those who have had prior infections following vaccination. These studies are being used to push vaccination in people who have natural immunity. But we don’t know if that “boost” is (a) helpful, or (b) harmful to the entrainment of the immune response to exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in the future. The new data suggest that, in the long run, immunity from natural infection is more durable in the absence of follow-up vaccination. The very bad news is that the current COVID-19 vaccines, designed to address the Wuhan-1 SARS-CoV-2 virus, show weaker and potentially negative efficacy against the Delta variant (e.g., Brackenridge County data). These two realities may be related due to a phenomenon known as “original antigenic sin”,which you can read about here. Or it could be disease enhancement due to pathogenic priming – and given the mangled mess of clinical diagnosis of COVID-19, it’s hard to tell.
For me, two key questions on natural vs. vaccine immunity are:
(1) Since memory B-cells against proteins that are measured by the studies in Cromer et al. show trends toward 100%, can we expect the same for an unknown number of the >50 potential immunogenic targets in the SARS-CoV-2 virus I reported in April, 2020? I think the answer is a strong “Yes!”. That means long-lived, durable and, very importantly BROAD (i.e., redundant) immunity from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection will likely be found to be vastly superior to the narrow immunity attempted by COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, which target only a single antigen source (the Spike protein).
(2) Does vaccination against the single antigen target, the Spike protein, undo the robust and durable – and broad immunologic learning by the memory cells of the human immune system against these other SARS-CoV-2 viral antigens in people who have had COVID-19? I think the answer is “Possibly”, and that studies designed to measure memory B- and T-cell duration that represent long-term immunologic memory against a wide variety of SARS-CoV-2 proteins would be needed to answer that question.
For now, the data on the likely and plausible effects of COVID-19 vaccines on SARS-CoV-2 Spike and RBD protein Ab production from infection are absolutely damning, and this is critical information that should be incorporated into public health policy now.
In short, the data suggest – and the precautionary principle supports the position that those with prior COVID-19 infections should not be vaccinated until we more fully understand the effects of COVID-19 vaccines on broad, durable, and in some cases hard-won, natural immunity.
SARS-CoV-2 uses all of the weapons it has in its arsenal. Why aren’t we?
I have been waiting for some time to write this article, in part because it involves complex ideas from evolutionary theory that most people will have little reasons to immediately understand, and in part due to the need for data to emerge to determine whether the predictions supported by evolutionary biology would bear out.
I also hoped for definitive evidence such as whistleblowers or results from FOIA on the biasing of case rates from the vaccinated and unvaccinated in the US. More on that another day.
There is now little doubt that SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is causing vaccine-induced immune escape. The data in support of the evolutionary escape of the virus from the vaccine are coming in from all over – especially from Israel, the country whose population was sold to Pfizer as an experimentation population for widespread vaccination.
“(These data challenge) the assumption that high universal vaccination rates will lead to herd immunity and prevent COVID-19 outbreaks. This was probably true for the wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus, but in the outbreak described here, 96.2% of the exposed population was vaccinated. Infection advanced rapidly (many cases became symptomatic within 2 days of exposure), and viral load was high.”
Counts of Cases, Hospitalizations and Deaths (CHDs) Are Biased in the US
A new study from Yale University shows that the vaccinated can indeed develop severe COVID-19. The authors of that study found that more than a quarter of fully vaccinated patients admitted to the hospital with SARS-CoV-2 were severely or critically ill with COVID-19. However, and importantly, they did not consider people who had received both doses “vaccinated” unless they developed first symptoms or tested positive 14 days following the second dose of the two-dose vaccines, or after seven days of the single-dose vaccine.
The importance of not counting the recently exposed as “vaccinated” as a confounding factor in all analyses of breakthrough cases, hospitalizations and deaths (CHDs) cannot be understated: it biased Moderna’s first efficacy calculations by nearly a third (95% if you exclude people who got COVID-19 before they could be given the second dose; 75% if you include everyone).
The fact that CDC is willing to sequence cases that have a PCR cycle threshold > 40 if they are unvaccinated, but only “scrutinize” and report cases of COVID-19 if their cycle thresholds are <28 AND the patient is hospitalized or dead means a systematic bias exists in what CDC considers “breakthrough cases” (in fact, there are two sets of data, one up to June, 2021 and one thereafter).
The Yale University publication is peppered notably with the usual caveats on the “rarity” of severe COVID-19 among the vaccinated, betraying either undue optimism for technology to stay ahead of SARS-CoV-2 evolution, or a misunderstanding of the fact that rare genotypes can sweep to fixation in a population in a short amount of time in a “selective sweep”, meaning that if the pathogenicity of the virus is related to escape of specific neutralizing antibodies, many if not most vaccinees might, right now, be primed to be at risk of enhanced disease from SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to the unvaccinated or the naturally immune.
COVID-19 New Case Rates Higher in Vaccinated Countries
It is not a given that the data from the US reporting higher COVID-19 cases in the US is at all reliable, which brings us back to data that appears to be most reliable: Israel (as described above), and Barnstable, County, Massachusetts.
Barnstable County Data Show Vaccine Effective is Zero or Negative
CDC reported that in July 2021, in Barnstable County, Massachusetts, 74% of cases were fully vaccinated. They found the Delta variant in 90% of patients. Importantly, this report showed the Cycle threshold distributions for the vaccinated and the unvaccinated – and found they were similar among specimens from patients who were fully vaccinated. This means there was not a diagnostic-based selection bias in the groups studied. One reason the study found this result was that they defined their groups as individuals who developed COVID-19 within 14 days of exposure vs those who did so 14 days or more after exposure. In other words, they did it right.
This report caused CDC Rochelle Walensky to issue a warning that the vaccinated should still mask, socially distance and otherwise presume that they could still contract and spread SARS-CoV-2. To many who were vaccinated, this felt like betrayal: Fauci and the CDC had promised a return to normal in as a trade for people taking on vaccine risk. Their promise has de-materialized, and Fauci now thinks we’re not going to have Christmas.
Why Natural Immunity is So Much Better Than Artificial Immunity
In my April 2020 analysis which introduced the world to the idea of #PathogenicPriming, I found a total of 54 immunogenic epitopes across all of the SARS-CoV-2 proteins. Nearly all of these epitopes had similarity to human proteins – that is, they had the capacity to induce reactogenic immunity, potentially leading to autoimmunity. Since that publication, the results were validated by researchers at Harvard University and elsewhere; the autoimmune risk associated with SARS-CoV-2 epitopes, including epitopes in the spike protein, has been laboratory-validated, and studied extensively and the number has been expanded to 79 (See Pubmed1 and Pubmed2).
By my estimation, in the spike-protein-only vaccines, all of the humoral response, that is, the adaptive immunity response, is mounted against a maximum of 5 epitopes. It’s not just that the human immune system primed to focus on the original SARS-CoV-2 spike protein will not be able to protect against variants that emerge and escape the vaccine-induced humoral response; it’s also that the vaccines themselves provide selection pressure against a very small part of a very small protein. In other words, when mutations in the spike protein arise, the act of vaccination itself will cause the emergence of – specifically the increase in frequency of – variants for which the vaccine is useless.
That’s simple Darwinian natural selection, and the epidemiologists who blame new breakthrough cases on “the variant” should stop and consider a root-cause analysis: whatever caused the variants to emerge (i.e., spread) also ultimately caused the breakthrough cases. The variant is a penultimate causal factor…. (See link for entire article)
Important quotes:
To boost the immune system to produce more antibodies that do not work is madness. (Regarding boosters)
From an evolutionary standpoint, durable immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is expected to be more resilient and far, far more effective – and last decades – where dozens of types of memory B- and T-cells have been generated, preventing the emergence of types that can surpass the immune escape threshold. Multifactorial approaches to control viremia are also available – and will help reduce viremia in every patient, instead of forcing them to sit at home and incubate new variants (See: Who Are the World’s Leading Authorities in COVID-19 Treatments?).
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 