Archive for the ‘Viruses’ Category

Are the Boosted Really 97 Times Less Likely to Die Than the Unvaccinated? Dr. McCullough & Links to Resources

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/are-the-boosted-really-97-times-less

Are the Boosted Really 97 Times Less Likely to Die Than the Unvaccinated?

Well, that depends on the definition of the phrase “To Die”- specifically how long you count – and if you ignore natural immunity.

On 2/2/2022, at a Press Briefing, CDC Director Rochelle Walensky reported that people who are boosted are 97 times less likely to die than the “unvaccinated”.

  1. These are weekly death rates. We need much longer term data, especially given the unexplained increases in all-cause mortality. Using weekly death infection/hospitalization/death rates to compare boosters is like measuring the protection of houses doused with water for ten minutes during a raging forest fire. “100% of houses were saved while they were being doused”… Come on, talk w/us in a year.
  2. Walensky left out any reference or comparison of the rates of death due to new infection in persons who are boosted to rates of death due to new infection in persons who are unvaccinated. This is important, because if you exclude people w/natural immunity, you’re comparing apples and oranges. And if you combine the vaccinated w/no prior infection with the vaccinated with prior infection, you’re combining clinical groups and ignoring a major contributor to variation in outcome. The last study of efficacy of natural immunity was that immunity lasted 13 months (Pubmed).
  3. Walensky (and others) are being super inconsistent in their data, as well.

At the White House presser, Jeff Zients, “Counselor to the President”, reported

“A year ago, we stood up a historic nationwide vaccination program that’s now gotten 75 percent of adults in the U.S. fully vaccinated.”

Wrong. Our World in Data reports 64.3% of Americans as “Fully Vaccinated” (according to CDC), “fully vaccinated” means “received two doses of Moderna or Pfizer” or “one dose of Johnson & Johnson”.

As long as they keep getting it wrong, real-world perception will not match reality, and vaccine skepticism will continue to grow.

The 2/2/2022 Press Briefing

_____________________

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/dr-peter-mccullough-on-the-joe-rogan

Dr. Peter McCullough on The Joe Rogan Show – Links to Resources (Urgent Share)

Links to resources mentioned. We must change allopathy from the outside in. Share w/nurses and doctors. Share everywhere.

James Lyons-Weiler

Feb. 7, 2022

Following Dr. McCullough’s jaw-dropping appearance on The Joe Rogan Show, I asked him for his slides so I could locate the resources he cited.

Dr. McCullough is experienced. He is precise. He is humble. He and others like him are saving lives. His protocols and messages should be required curriculum for all medical students and continuing medical education for all practicing physicians and nurses.

This article contains links to the resources he mentioned to Joe. Click on each image for the resource. (Note: This article is too long for all it to appear in your inbox, so you’ll need to visit the full article at Substack.)

The main points he made include:

  • COVID-19 pandemic is a global disaster (mass-casualty event).
  • For him, it’s not treatment vs. vaccine.
  • The prehospital phase is a major therapeutic opportunity.
  • The pathophysiology of COVID-19 is complex is not amenable to single drug.
  • Early ambulatory therapy with a sequenced, multi-drug regimen is supported by available sources of evidence and has a positive benefit-to-risk profile.
  • Protection from COVID-19 vaccines is not sufficiently complete or durable and we need to add multimodal treatments.
  • We can reduce the risk of hospitalization and death.
  • We can more safely temporize to close the crisis with herd immunity.
  • COVID-19 genetic vaccines have an unfavorable safety profile.
  • Censorship and reprisal are working to crush freedom of speech, scientific discourse, and medical progress.

Hydroxychloroquine factory fire in Taiwan

LINK Jessica Rose VAERS Study: More reports of deaths following COVID-19 vaccines than from all other vaccines combined all prior years.

LINK Study showing that healthy boys have considerably higher chances of hospitalization with myocarditis than with COVID-19 respiratory illness even at peak prevalence.

LINK Choi S, Lee S, Seo JW, Kim MJ, Jeon YH, Park JH, Lee JK, Yeo NS. Myocarditis-induced Sudden Death after BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination in Korea: Case Report Focusing on Histopathological Findings. J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Oct 18;36(40):e286. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e286. PMID: 34664804; PMCID: PMC8524235.

Enough deaths in UK Yellow Card for any other product to be pulled.

Breakthrough cases are substantial and can be deadly.

The vaccine efficacy has waned.

Early aggressive treatments now needed more than ever.

Dr. McCullough’s ground-breaking first papers. Essential reading for all physicians.

Patients at and before different stages need different targeted therapies.

You cannot catch COVID-19 twice. Period.

Ivermectin disinformation is killing people.

The mass psychosis follows previous planned mass psychoses.

Seduction of children on Sesame Street, the book and Joe Rogan appearance below.

(See link for pictures, graphs, and links)

For more:

Spanish Study Shows Vaxxed Spread COVID at Same Rate as Unvaccinated

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/02/spains-first-study-on-omicron-finds-vaccinated-people-spread-covid-at-same-rate-as-unvaccinated/

Spain’s First Study on Omicron Finds Vaccinated People Spread COVID at Same Rate as Unvaccinated

Spain’s First Study on Omicron Finds Vaccinated People Spread COVID at Same Rate as Unvaccinated

Several governments in Spain scrapped COVID passports following the study’s release.

The first Spanish study on how the Omicron variant of COVID-19 infects, incubates, and transmits was recently concluded by the Public Health Observatory of Cantabria.

The findings, which have not yet been peer reviewed, show that the highly infectious variant accounted for nearly half of the infections recorded during the whole pandemic. One reason Omicron has proven so transmissible, researchers discovered, is that the window for transmission is earlier than previous variants.

“Half of the infections occurred before the onset of symptoms,” researchers said.

The early stage transmission, scientists noted, complicates some mitigation efforts.

“This would imply that the effectiveness of measures such as screening, rapid testing or isolation would decrease significantly in the absence of preventive measures such as distance, limiting mass gatherings or social gatherings,” researchers said.

Perhaps the most consequential finding in the research, however, is that vaccines did not appear to reduce the spread of the virus.

“Vaccinated cases seem to have the same transmission capacity as unvaccinated people,” researchers concluded, according to EITB Radio Televisión Pública Vasca (the Basque Autonomous Community’s public broadcast service).

This is a departure from the Delta variant, researchers said, where transmission differences were found in vaccinated households and workplaces.

The study was based on 622 Omicron cases (and their 1,420 contacts) detected in Cantabria, a region on Spain’s north coast, in December 2021.

Scrapping Vaccine Passports

The findings out of Spain are just the latest example of why COVID-19 continues to spread despite human ingenuity and the widespread efforts of central planners to tame the virus.

Unlike previous pandemics, governments around the world took sweeping actions to restrict basic freedoms out of fear of the deadly pathogen. Businesses were closed, speech restricted, free assembly denied, and bodily autonomy was violated.

Despite these efforts the virus, now in its third year, continues to rage, and in many parts of the world governments have been slow to rescind harmful policies despite their ineffectiveness.

To its credit, parts of Spain have proven much more responsive than other parts of the world.

Two week ago, public health officials in Catalonia, an autonomous province in northeast Spain, and several other provinces, announced they were scrapping vaccine passports in light of this new evidence.

A committee of scientists told Catalonia’s regional government that because of the nature of Omicron, “a large part of the population is once again susceptible to getting infected whether or not they are vaccinated or have already had the illness.”

“The effectiveness of the compulsory use of the Covid certificate is reduced as an extra level of security,” scientists added.

The requirement to show a COVID passport had been in place since November in Catalonia, the second most-populous community in Spain, with some 7.7 million people. Smaller regions in Spain, such as Cantabria and Asturias, also have reportedly announced they will no longer require COVID passports for people to enter bars, restaurants, and other public spaces.

European media point out that Spain has suffered from widespread Omicron outbreaks even though the country boasts one of the higher vaccination rates in the world.

“Despite high levels of vaccination in Spain where 90.7 percent of people over the age of 12 are fully immunised,” The Local reports, “coronavirus cases exploded in Spain over the Christmas holidays, giving it one of Europe’s highest incidence rates.

The decision to scrap the vaccine passport follows widespread protests in Spain against vaccine passports and mask mandates.

The Pre-Eminence of His Own Plan

While the effectiveness of vaccines in slowing the spread is questionable, there is still an abundance of evidence suggesting that vaccines can significantly reduce the likelihood of falling seriously ill from COVID-19.

Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, a professor of medicine who studies epidemiology at Stanford University, credits his own speedy recovery from COVID to the vaccines and has praised them as “a wonderful achievement.”

But Bhattacharya has said vaccines are primarily a matter of personal health, not public health, since the benefits of vaccination lay primarily with the individual, and has argued that efforts to mandate vaccination erode confidence in public health.

“Opposition to discriminatory vaccine mandates is not the same as opposition to vaccines,” Bhattacharya said last year. “On the contrary, support for vaccine mandates is an anti-vax position because it breeds distrust and resentment toward public health.”

The new research out of Spain, combined with recent data from the CDC that show natural immunity confers more protection from some COVID variants than vaccines, reveals the folly of these coercive policies.

Vaccine passports are inherently unjust because free people require free movement, but they become both unjust and ridiculous when they fail to reduce the transmission of the virus or account for natural immunity.

Provinces in Spain that are rescinding their vaccine passport policies in light of this new evidence deserve some credit, because this does not come naturally to state planners.

In his work Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, the economist Ludwig von Mises noted how difficult it is for bureaucrats to relinquish control over their own plans.

“What those calling themselves planners advocate is not the substitution of planned action for letting things go. It is the substitution of the planner’s own plan for the plans of his fellow-men,” Mises wrote. “The planner is a potential dictator who wants to deprive all other people of the power to plan and act according to their own plans. He aims at one thing only: the exclusive absolute pre-eminence of his own plan.”

For those wondering why many countries continue to use coercive policies even in light of this new evidence, the words of Mises offer a beam of understanding.

Fortunately, many countries around the world—including the United KingdomDenmark, and the Czech Republic—are beginning to see the error and injustice of these coercive measures.


This article was reprinted with the author’s permission. It was originally published by the Foundation for Economic Education. Jonathan Miltimore is the Managing Editor of FEE.org. His writing/reporting has been the subject of articles in TIME magazine, The Wall Street Journal, CNN, Forbes, Fox News, and the Star Tribune.

Note: This commentary provides referenced information and perspective on a topic related to vaccine science, policy, law or ethics being discussed in public forums and by U.S. lawmakers.  The websites of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) provide information and perspective of federal agencies responsible for vaccine research, development, regulation and policymaking.

Pentagon’s Response to Explosive DOD Medical Data is An Even Bigger Story Than The Data

https://www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-the-pentagons-response-to-the-explosive-dod-medical-data-is-an-even-bigger-story-than-the-data

One thing is clear about the revelation of the 2021 military epidemiological data and the military’s response to it: There is undoubtedly a public health and national security crisis in the military, and the Pentagon’s reaction only seems to be concerned with exonerating the vaccine, not fixing its own alleged problem.

It’s now certain that the military’s health surveillance system — DMED — showed a massive increase in sickness and injury diagnoses in 2021 over previous years, particularly in the neurological, cardiovascular, oncological, and reproductive health categories. The military, in a very terse and cryptic statement to PolitiFact last week, admitted as much, but claimed without any further explanation that the data in the system accessed by several military doctors working with attorney Thomas Renz was only a “fraction” of the true numbers that existed. In the words of the Pentagon spokesman, it was a “glitch in the database.” Where those true numbers existed, why they weren’t in the system for five years, what exactly was in the system, and why the 2021 numbers were accurate according to the DOD account remain a mystery.

However, one by one, the military public health officials have been adding back random numbers to the 2016 through 2020 codes. I’m told by Renz and two of the whistleblowers that throughout the past week, they have queried the same data again, and in most of the ICD categories, they have found that the numbers from 2016 through 2020 were “increased” exponentially to look as though 2021 was not an abnormal year. This has been done without any transparency, any press release, any statement of narrative, and sloppily in a way that makes the already unbelievable narrative simply impossible to believe.  (See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • The DOD magically and suddenly discovered 5 years of “false data” only after attorney Renz came forth with shockingly dramatic increases in medical diagnoses among the military.
  • According to Horowitz, the DOD is only concerned with downplaying any potential culpability of the vaccine, not explaining how military health data could be so wrong.
  • This means the CDC was looking at data for months that showed insane safety signals and did nothing about it, and somehow nobody in HHS or the DOD all along thought the data was a “glitch.”
  • Horowitz further states that there is no way the “new” data could be updated so quickly.
  • Just take a look at the two graphs, the first of which shows the original data of total outpatient diagnoses before the Pentagon changed it:

And here is the top-line tally for 2016-2020 based on the new numbers added:

  • The mysteriously sudden changes make 2021 look exactly in line with every other year, despite COVID and “vaccine” injuries
  • The initial data downloaded by military whistleblowers makes more more sense because it accommodates both COVID and “vaccine” injury,
  • The updated data is makes zero sense as all active duty soldiers are medically screened, and obesity, diabetes, and heart conditions are very rare among this healthy population. If there is truly over 20 million diagnoses every year in the military there is something seriously wrong.

Take a look at the data for nervous system diagnoses before the numbers were altered:

Look at the number of pulmonary embolism diagnoses before and after the DOD “fixed” the data. Blood clotting in the lungs is a clear consequence of the spike protein, which sticks to CD-147 receptors on blood vessels.

Here are the numbers before:

And here are the numbers after the DOD alteration:

  • How can a military of healthy young people have such a high baseline of pulmonary embolisms every year?
  • The DOD is so overprotective of the “vaccine” that it revised numbers to show zero increase in ailments that are universally understood to have increasedat least to some extent because of the “vaccine”.

Here is the original pericarditis data queried by the whistleblowers:

And here is the new data, which seem to indicate no unusual increase, even if we add in the missing month for 2021:

  • The silence both from the media and congressional members of the House and Senate Armed Services Committees is astounding.
  • One of two things is true:
    • there was mass “vaccine” injury in the military
    • our military is very unhealthy and the Pentagon completely lost control over epidemiological surveillance of these health issues for years
Either way, it doesn’t look good.

Go here for another article titled, “Regarding the Defense Medical Epidemiological Database Data Dump: Database Artifact, Smoking Gun, or Something in Between” by Dr. Malone.

WI Senator Johnson Writes Letter to DOD on COVID Injection Injuries

2022-02-01 RHJ letter to DoD re DMED

The Honorable Lloyd J. Austin III
Secretary
Department of Defense

Dear Secretary Austin:

On January 24, 2022, I held a roundtable featuring world renowned doctors and medical experts who shared their perspectives on COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and safety and the overall response to the pandemic.1 At that roundtable, I heard testimony from Thomas Renz, an attorney who is representing three Department of Defense (DoD) whistleblowers, who revealed disturbing information regarding dramatic increases in medical diagnoses among military personnel. The concern is that these increases may be related to the COVID-19 vaccines that our servicemen and women have been mandated to take.

Based on data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database (DMED), Renz reported that these whistleblowers found a significant increase in registered diagnoses on DMED for miscarriages, cancer, and many other medical conditions in 2021 compared to a five-year average from 2016-2020.2 For example, at the roundtable Renz stated that registered diagnoses for neurological issues increased 10 times from a five-year average of 82,000 to 863,000 in 2021.3 There were also increases in registered diagnoses in 2021 for the following medical conditions:4

Hypertension – 2,181% increase
Diseases of the nervous system – 1,048% increase
Malignant neoplasms of esophagus – 894% increase
Multiple sclerosis – 680% increase
Malignant neoplasms of digestive organs – 624% increase
Guillain-Barre syndrome – 551% increase
Breast cancer – 487% increase
Demyelinating – 487% increase
Malignant neoplasms of thyroid and other endocrine glands – 474% increase

Female infertility – 472% increase
Pulmonary embolism – 468% increase
Migraines – 452% increase
Ovarian dysfunction – 437% increase
Testicular cancer – 369% increase
Tachycardia – 302% increase

Renz also informed me that some DMED data showing registered diagnoses of myocarditis had been removed from the database.5 Following the allegation that DMED data had been doctored, I immediately wrote to you on January 24 requesting that you preserve all records referring, relating, or reported to DMED.6 I have yet to hear whether you have complied with this request.

At the roundtable, Renz revealed the names of the brave whistleblowers who uncovered this information in DMED: Drs. Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long.7 Any retaliatory actions taken against these individuals will not be tolerated and will be investigated immediately. In order to better understand what, if any awareness DoD has about COVID-19 vaccine injuries to service members, I request you provide the following information:

  1. Is DoD aware of increases in registered diagnoses of miscarriages, cancer, or other
    medical conditions in DMED in 2021 compared to a five-year average from 2016-2020?
    If so, please explain what actions DoD has taken to investigate the root cause for the
    increases in these diagnoses.
  2. Have registered diagnoses of myocarditis in DMED been removed from the database
    from January 2021 to December 2021? If so, please explain why and when this
    information was removed and identify who removed it.

Please provide this information as soon as possible but no later than February 15, 2022. Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Ron Johnson
Ranking Member
Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations

  1. Press Release, VIDEO RELEASE Sen. Ron Johnson COVID-19: A Second Opinion Panel Garners Over 800,000
    Views in 24 Hours, Jan. 25, 2022, https://www ronjohnson.senate.gov/2022/1/video-release-sen-ron-johnson-covid-
    19-a-second-opinion-panel-garners-over-800-000-views-in-24-hours.
  2. COVID-19: A Second Opinion, Rumble, Jan. 22, 2022, https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html
    (at 4:54:35).
  3. Id. at 4:55:23.
  4. Data on file with staff.
  5. COVID-19: A Second Opinion, Rumble, Jan. 22, 2022, https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html (at 4:52:54).
  6. Letter from Ron Johnson, Ranking Member, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, to Lloyd Austin, Secretary, Dep’t of Defense, Jan. 24, 2022.
  7. COVID-19: A Second Opinion, Rumble, Jan. 22, 2022, https://rumble.com/vt62y6-covid-19-a-second-opinion.html  (at 4:54:38).



COVID Cases Inflated For Profit: Multiple Gunshot Wound Victim Coded as COVID, Car Wreck Victim Sedated Against His Will & Put on a Vent, & Medical Kidnapping Increasing

https://www.projectveritas.com/news/covid-cases-inflated-for-profit-the-guy-went-in-for-multiple-gunshot-wounds/  Video Here (Approx. 10 Min)

COVID Cases Inflated for Profit: ‘The Guy Went in for Multiple Gunshot Wounds and he was Coded as COVID’

Feb. 2, 2022

  • Jeanne Stagg, a whistleblower who worked in Inpatient Utilization Management, approached Project Veritas after seeing cases coded as COVID-19 that she says should not have COVID-19 listed as the “primary diagnosis.”
  • Stagg: “I’ve tried to raise awareness to my leadership and even with the Fraud, Waste, and Abuse Department, and it just kind of fell on deaf ears.”
  • The Chief Medical Officer for United Healthcare of Louisiana (Medicaid) opined in a recorded phone conversation that the Medicaid rate for reimbursement of COVID-19 patients, which is faster and significantly higher, could be the motivation for the improper “primary diagnosis” codes.
  • “Oh, yes. Yeah. I would think that there’s some motivation that it’s driving higher rates of reimbursement or quicker reimbursement, or something, because otherwise there’s no reason to put, you know, something like that as a leading diagnosis in an asymptom– basically asymptomatic patients,” said Dr. Morial, Chief Medical Officer for United Healthcare of Louisiana.
  • The Louisiana Department of Health and Hospitals has suspended utilization review which is the process of determining whether health care is medically necessary for a patient or an insured individual. The whistleblower says this could be a major contributing factor to spikes in COVID numbers, which then influence public health decisions.

[Baton Rouge, La. – Feb. 2, 2022] A source who works for United Healthcare of Louisiana’s Inpatient Utilization Management Department is blowing the whistle on COVID-19 cases possibly being inflated for financial incentive. The brazen instance of such potential abuse was a patient who had multiple gunshot wounds with his primary diagnosis listed as COVID-19.

United Healthcare of Louisiana is the states’ Medicaid arm, and as the whistleblower Jeanne Stagg points out in a conversation with the Chief Medical Officer of United Healthcare of Louisiana, Dr. Julie Morial, there are several financial incentives for hospitals to prefer to code patients as COVID-19 hospitalizations.

“Well maybe that’s… maybe that’s driving some of the motivation,” said Dr. Morial before stating that the Medicaid rate for reimbursement of COVID-19 patients is both higher and faster.

Project Veritas also published footage of a leadership call within United Healthcare of Louisiana wherein the whistleblower’s attempt to discuss the improper primary diagnoses she is seeing was dismissed.

A major element of this story is the fact that recent actions by public officials have allowed the problem to persist, and the whistleblower believes erroneous codes could be the cause of COVID-19 spikes which influence major public health decisions.   

A health plan advisory, which announced that all utilization management for all medical hospitalizations [including but not limited to initial service authorization and concurrent reviews], must be suspended was the action taken — which is in question.

“Now, this is not specific to COVID-19. This is every single hospital admission. We’re not allowed to do medical necessity review. So, it gives the hospitals free reign to admit anything they want. Code it however they want,” says the whistleblower, Jeanne Stagg.

United Healthcare of Louisiana’s Dr. Morial was contacted for comment on this story and said, “When I see a patient, and if a patient is presenting other symptoms that aren’t suggestive of a COVID infection, even though they may test positive for COVID, that’s not my primary diagnosis.”

Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization. Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues raised through its investigations. Donate now to support our mission.

Victim of Car Accident Sedated Against His Will & Put on a Vent – Diagnosed as a COVID Patient

To demonstrate how this is happening, a man has just come forward to give his testimony in public about how he was in a car accident, where EMS ambulance services arrived on the scene and sedated him against his will, air lifted him to a hospital allegedly in Tucson, Arizona, and he woke up 8 hours later on a ventilator because he was diagnosed as a “COVID” patient.

He was all alone in his room when he woke up, so he took himself off of the ventilator, removed the IV and catheter, and demanded to be released from the hospital.  He considers himself lucky to be alive today.  This is on our Bitchute channel, and also on our Telegram channel(Fast forward to 10:06 to hear his testimony)

____________________

Medical kidnapping has been going on unabated from the beginning.  I posted an article on it back in September, 2021, complete with numerous heart-breaking examples.

https://www.ntd.com/attorneys-report-spike-in-calls-for-help-from-families-of-patients-hospitalized-with-covid-

Attorneys Report Spike in Calls for Help From Families of Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19

Nanette Holt

Attorneys around the country report an alarming uptick in calls for help from families of patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Some say they’ve talked to family members who were arrested after trying to visit a loved one or to speak with a doctor after communications with the hospital were cut off.  (See link for article)

Summary of what attorneys are calling abuse:

  • hospitals preventing family visits
  • failing to provide nutrition and fluids
  • coercing patients to agree to treatments they’ve already refused multiple times, like remdesivir and ventilation
  • hospitals refusing to release patients making it impossible to get off the COVID express
  • hospital attorneys ask judges to seal documents that would reveal their arguments
  • arresting family members for simply requesting a visit with their loved one or a conversation with the doctor
  • hospitals become immediately combative when treatment questions arise
  • an attorney with a client who works in hospital billing told her that hospitals receive a federal bonus payments for:
    • $17K for every patient confirmed to have COVID
    • another $37K for patients put on ventilators.

An attorney’s sage advice:

“Stay out of the hospital, no matter what. And if it happens that you’re admitted, have a medical power of attorney immediately written up to say no to remdesivir.

Hospitals often ask patients being admitted to sign a health-care directive or living will indicating, in advance, decisions about whether or not to be put on life support.

“I advise clients against this,” Forgét said. Signing one of those documents “vests your physician with authority that supersedes your spouse, or other family members. This can yield tragic results!”

Giving a physician that power means he or she can remove life support without consulting family, he says. “Signing that gives your physician permission to kill you!”

For more: