Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

Magic Trick Reveal: How To Get Perfect Efficacy From a ‘Vaccine’ That Doesn’t Work. Two White Papers Call to Halt COVID Shots, But FDA Approves Non-mRNA COVID Shot

https://kirschsubstack.com/p/the-big-magic-trick-revealed?

The big magic trick revealed!

How can you get near perfect efficacy from a vaccine that doesn’t work? Thanks to Professor Jeffrey Morris, I now know the magic trick too! This one had me fooled me for years.

The Secret Truth Behind Penn & Teller: Fool Us

I like Penn and Teller. But they don’t know jack about vaccines. Check out this video they did. They should apologize and re-do the video to tell the truth. YouTube will ban it though.

Executive Summary

If you have a policy of COVID testing where it is mandatory to test the unvaccinated 2x/week but the vaccinated can totally skip testing, this can massively skew all studies based on that data.

I just found out this was the case in the Czech Republic which is the only country where we have record level data.

That explains a lot, doesn’t it? A testing policy like that can make an ineffective vaccine close to perfect.

Bottom line: the only honest way to see if the vaccine worked is to compare the whole period all-cause mortality between those who got the shots and those who did not. Then you learn the truth.

Guess what? There isn’t a single study that does this.Zero. Zip. Nada.

So I calculated it for the Czech Republic. It shows that the vaccines should be stopped. But you already knew that, didn’t you?

And if you can’t get COVID, you can’t die from COVID!

BAM! The magic trick has been revealed. The next time you want to make a vaccine super effective, there is nothing like deploying a differential testing policy like this.

Therefore, in Czechia, you get a near perfect vaccine and can write papers about it and nobody is the wiser.  (See link for article)

_______________

**Comment**

These tactics need to be continually exposed for what they are: false and misleading – constituting scientific fraud.  Those in public health should be reviewing these things before they roll out a drug or medical product of any kind.

Hirsch then shows a table (to access, click top link) that shows when you actually compare whole period all-cause mortality between the injected and the non-injected you discover the shots are killing people.  But, reality is already showing this for those paying attention.

For more:

People have been shouting about these death shots for years.  There’s plenty of published science showing the myriad of problems.

Two White Papers Call For COVID Shot Halt

The IPAK-EDU White Paper 2025-ENDEUA states that when corrected efficacy curves and suppressed risks are taken into account, the mRNA covid shots fail the EUA standard.  The shots were based upon interim data from large-scale Phase III trials. The legal standard under §564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires that a product may be authorized for emergency use only if it is “reasonable to believe” that the product “may be effective” against a life-threatening condition, that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks, and that no adequate alternatives are availableThis report  demonstrates, through a rigorous retrospective analysis, that these criteria were never met.  

Go here to listen to Dr. Jeyanthi Kunadhasan, an Australian anesthesiologist and perioperative physician who was terminated from her hospital position after questioning the risk-benefit profile of COVID-19 vaccines in healthy individuals. Following her dismissal, she joined a group of international medical volunteers tasked with reviewing the 500,000+ pages of internal Pfizer documents released as part of a court-ordered FOIA request. This effort was coordinated by DailyClout and Dr. Naomi Wolf. As a result of that work, Dr. Kunadhasan has become one of the foremost experts on Pfizer’s pivotal mRNA vaccine trial, focusing specifically on discrepancies in reported deaths and adverse events.

What Dr. Kunadhasan uncovers raises grave questions about data integrity, regulatory failure, fraud, and the validity of the FDA’s EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 shot.

And yet another White Paper is calling for an urgent halt on self-amplifying RNA ‘vaccine’ deployment until comprehensive safety studies are done to address contagiousness risks.  The paper discusses the significant theoretical risk including contagiousness through shedding, sexual transmission, and recombination with wild-type viruses.

FDA Commissioner Dr. Marty Makary and head of FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Dr. Vinay Prasad, note that a number of other countries such as Australia and Germany only recommend the clot shots to certain populations while the U.S. has taken a ‘one size fits all’ approach because experts have argued Americans are too stupid to understand age-and risk-based recommendations.

But, even this approach ignores the elephant in the room: there are treatments for COVID which means a ‘vaccine’ isn’t even needed.  Then, there’s the fact they have negative efficacy.

What more is it going to take?

Evidently, a lot more……

The Food and Drug Administration issued an approval for Novavax’s Covid-19 ‘vaccine.’ This is the only non-mRNA vaccine.

The vaccine was approved for adults aged 65 and older and individuals aged 12 to 64 with at least one underlying health condition that increases their risk for severe COVID-19 outcomes. Reading the clinical trials prompts serious questions.

The trials included populations that had a single dose and populations that had two doses. The trials showed a reduction in symptomatic Covid 7 days after the second dose. But the FDA didn’t approve two doses. They only approved one. So is one dose even effective at all at preventing Covid? We don’t know, that wasn’t tested (Is this sounding familiar yet?)

There is also a noted risk of myocarditis and heart inflammation. There was also at least one vaccine recipient with “a serious event of Guillain Barré syndrome reported 9 days following the shot.  The FDA notes that Novavax has to follow up on any further cases if they observe it.

The FDA is also supposed to follow up on how the vaccine does when it is shipped to patients. They must submit a study called “Shipping Evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 rS (JN.1 Vaccine) Drug Product in Pre-Filled Syringe (PFS) Finished Good Presentation” by July of this year.

They approve vaccines not knowing how they will fare once they are shipped to doctor’s offices. They test it on us.

Don’t forget the low prevalence of Covid.

There is good news: there are at least 16 states with pending bills seeking to ban the clot shot mandates, establish a ‘vaccine’ bill of rights, or prohibit any immunization containing mRNA material.  Some bills would require manufacturers to label foods containing mRNA, according to data compiled by Bloomberg Government.

More than 2,500 ‘vaccine’-related bills have been introduced since 2021.

And top FDA official just disclosed she never got the clot shot due to her concerns about biodistribution.  She was concerned about excretion in breast milk since she was pregnant during the COVID ‘pandemic.’  When asked if information has emerged that validates her choice, said she thinks it does, but wanted to go on record that she was not speaking on behalf of the FDA.  

Researchers reported in a 2022 paper that messenger ribonucleic acid, which is in the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 shots, was detected in human breast milk. Another paper, in 2023, detailed similar findings.

Pfizer and Moderna did not return requests for comment.

And ‘Dilbert’ comic strip creator, Scott Adams, just admitted to having the same aggressive turbo cancer as former President Biden.

“The smartest, happiest people are the ones who didn’t get the vaccination, and they’re still alive.” ~ Scott Adams, Dilbert creator

It’s getting hot in the kitchen, folks.

Draft Resolution on WHO Pandemic Agreement

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/draft-resolution-on-the-who-pandemic?

Draft Resolution on the WHO Pandemic Agreement

The WHO has finally published their “Draft Resolution on the WHO Pandemic Agreement.”

BREAKING NEWS:

The resolution to adopt the proposed “Pandemic Agreement” was finally made available on May 15, 2025.

The WHO seeks to have its cake and eat it too.

They want nations to begin to implement aspects of the “Pandemic Agreement” even though the agreement cannot be signed until at least after the 79th World Health Assembly in May 2026.

NO VOTE SHOULD OCCUR UNTIL THE ENTIRE DOCUMENT HAS BEEN WRITTEN AND AGREED UPON
In my opinion, the World Health Organization needs to be abolished and removed from the face of the planet.
(See link for article, the WHO draft resolution, and important videos)
_________________
 
**Comment**
 
According to this, the agreement centers on something called the PABS system, a global plan to share profits from so-called “pandemic pathogens.”
 
“They literally talk about pathogens with pandemic potential,” Roguski said. “They don’t need to have an actual outbreak.”
 
Roguski warns their goal is to build permanent mRNA infrastructure, fast-track approvals, and hand out billions in contracts—before a single case is reported.
 
Even worse: every country, including the U.S., is still on the hook unless they opt out of the WHO’s International Health Regulations by July 19, 2025.
 
Trump may have promised to leave, but the clock is still ticking—and the WHO isn’t backing down.
 
The good news? They failed to reach full agreement.
The bad news? They’re trying to push it through anyway.

For more:

CLICK HERE to give each and every Senator a phone call and demand that they instruct their staff to copy House Resolution 79 (H.R. 79 – the WHO Withdrawal Act) and submit it as companion legislation in the Senate. Let them know that you want to #ExitTheWHOnot reform it.  Members of Congress already gave a letter to Biden in 2022 calling on him to exit the WHO.

Just in case you believe the misguided notion that the WHO cares about ‘health,’ the organization using the One Health approach, aims to monitor and control the global food supply, but shrouds it under the ruse of preventing diseases that cause diarrhea and achievement of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals.

Please also remember the WHO to this day denies the effectiveness of ivermectin and was part of the Cabal keeping thousands upon thousands  from effective treatment for COVID.  They only recommend the FDA ‘approved,’ expensive, dangerous and ineffective Paxlovid,  molnupiravir, and remdesivir.  

 

Tuttle Destroys NASEM’s Lyme Disease Report

https://www.change.org/p/the-us-senate-calling-for-a-congressional-investigation-of-the-cdc-idsa-and-aldf/

The IDSA’s Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome was not good enough!

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH, United States
May 15, 2025

The IDSA’s Post Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome was not good enough so now we have yet another distraction avoiding the elephant in the room (chronic Lyme) called Lyme IACI; “Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illness.”

That should add another decade to the denial of chronic Lyme allowing the pharmaceutical industrial complex to roll out its Lyme vaccine and payouts in the form of patent royalties to all those responsible for this crime against humanity. It was that rush to create a vaccine early in the discovery phase of the epidemic that led to the deliberate mishandling of the disease. All the eggs were put into the vaccine basket before a cure was researched and uncovered. We have been dealing with an antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug but the vaccine money grab was far too lucrative to pass up. Covid proved to us all that our Public Health Officials will do or say anything for the sake of a vaccine; “Safe and Effective“??????

Please take a moment to read the following inquiry sent to Marcia McNutt, President of the National Academy of Sciences regarding a recent publication referencing the latest acronym “Lyme IACI.”

Image of McNutt was found here: https://www.nasonline.org/directory-entry/marcia-mcnutt-6apamq/

Inquiry to Marcia McNutt:

———- Original Message ———-

From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “mmcnutt@nas.edu” <mmcnutt@nas.edu>, “vdzau@nas.edu” <vdzau@nas.edu>
Cc: “wkearney@nas.edu” <wkearney@nas.edu>, “dmay@nas.edu” <dmay@nas.edu>, “amacdonald@nas.edu” <amacdonald@nas.edu>
Date: 05/14/2025 8:50 AM EDT
Subject: The National Academies Press; Charting a Path Toward New Treatments for Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illness

The National Academies Press

Charting a Path Toward New Treatments for Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illness (“Lyme IACI”)
https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/28578/chapter/1

Marcia McNutt

President of the National Academy of Sciences and Chair of the National Research Council

“Most of my current activity centers around meta science – how to shape the culture and conduct of science to build trust, excellence, inclusiveness, and integrity.” – Marcia McNutt

Dear Marcia McNutt,

After reading through your Biosketch you seem to have the capability to detect scientific fraud. Would suppressing evidence of antibiotic resistance (for the sake of a vaccine) constitute a crime? Please take a moment to read the following inquiry addressed to Grace E. Marx, MD Medical Epidemiologist, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. If the scientific references/evidence I provide were not suppressed the focus would have been on finding effective antimicrobials to treat this antibiotic resistant/tolerant superbug.

Question: Has the National Academy of Sciences under your direction just had the wool pulled over their eyes?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Carl Tuttle
Independent Researcher
Hudson, NH

Cc: Victor J. Dzau President, National Academy of Medicine

William Kearney Executive Director of the Office of News and Public Information

David May Director, National Academies Press

Alphonse MacDonald Publisher, National Academies Press

Inquiry to: Grace E. Marx, MD Medical Epidemiologist, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

———- Original Message ———-

From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “grace.marx@cuanschutz.edu” <grace.marx@cuanschutz.edu>, “gmarx@cdc.gov” <gmarx@cdc.gov>
Cc: “katrina.rouse@usdoj.gov” <katrina.rouse@usdoj.gov>, “jonathan.kanter@usdoj.gov” <jonathan.kanter@usdoj.gov>
Date: 10/25/2024 9:11 AM EDT

Subject: Tick-Borne Diseases and Associated Illnesses, Community Engagement Series: Mental Health and Neurological Effects

Tick-Borne Diseases and Associated Illnesses, Community Engagement Series: Mental Health and Neurological Effects
https://www.hhs.gov/oidp/initiatives/tick-borne-diseases-associated-illnesses-national-community-engagement-initiative/index.html

3:00 pm – 3:20 pm   A Clinician Toolkit: Improving Care for Patients with Prolonged Symptoms and Concerns about Lyme Disease By Grace E. Marx, MD Medical Epidemiologist, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Dear Dr. Marx,

I listened to your presentation yesterday with great interest and I must congratulate you for your outstanding performance in suppressing all evidence of persistent infection; chronic Lyme disease.

We have studies proving persistent infection after antibiotic treatment for mice, dogs, poniesmonkeys, cowsiris biopsy, and ligamentous tissue but if you perform a simple Google search for the following statement, “There is no convincing scientific evidence that chronic Lyme exists” you will find the top search results are connected to “elements of academic medicine” involved in the denial of the late stage Lyme epidemic.

In 1991 the Lyme disease organism, Borrelia burgdorferi, was grown from the cerebrospinal fluid of Lyme patient Vicki Logan at the Centers for Disease Control in Fort Collins, Colorado despite prior treatment with intravenous antibiotics. The patient died when the insurer refused additional IV antibiotics. Here is a copy of Logan’s CDC positive culture report for your review.

(Vicky Logan’s Chronic Lyme Autopsy results Page #1234567)

There are 700 peer-reviewed publications referencing persistent infection and in a 2018 study all patients were culture positive even after multiple years on antibiotics so there was no relief from current antimicrobials. Some of these patients had taken as many as eleven different types of antibiotics.

Thirty-four years ago Dr. Allen Steere identified chronic Lyme disease which should have set off a red flag prompting an immediate search for better antimicrobials but then did a 180° as he became principal investigator (PI) of the Phase 3 clinical trial for the first Lyme disease vaccine. So all the eggs were put into the vaccine basket while a campaign was orchestrated to discredit the sick and disabled patient population along with the courageous clinicians attempting to help these patients. Apparently, a chronic relapsing seronegative disease did not fit the business model of patent royalties, vaccine development and pharmaceutical profits.

Here is Dr. Steere’s 1990 publication summary for your review:

The New England Journal of Medicine 

Published November 22, 1990

Chronic neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199011223232102

The chart below summarizes Lyme research funded by the NIH and only 2.5% has been allocated for treatment:

[Click on the link above to view the chart]

For the record there are many infections requiring long-term antibiotics so why Klempner stopped his NIH funded antibiotic treatment trials for Lyme after 90 days makes absolutely no sense whatsoever:

From the following publication:

Benefit of intravenous antibiotic therapy in patients referred for treatment of neurologic Lyme disease
https://www.dovepress.com/benefit-of-intravenous-antibiotic-therapy-in-patients-referred-for-tre-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-IJGM

Infections requiring long-term antibiotics:

[Download the article and View Table 4 as there are nine infections listed] 

Lyme misdiagnosed/undiagnosed for months, years or decades is far more incapacitating than “acute” Lyme and 2-4 weeks of antibiotics does not scratch the surface of this well-established/immune suppressive infection. These are the patients who need help the most but have been excluded in research for decades. There are countless stories of patients seroconverting after the initial few doses of Doxycycline and now that a toxin has been identified that puts Lyme disease in an altogether different category of infection:

Toxins 

Published: 21 May 2024

Borrelia burgdorferi 0755, a Novel Cytotoxin with Unknown Function in Lyme Disease
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6651/16/6/233

So it would appear that one way to get a medical association (AMA) to go along with the suppression of evidence is to throw them a boatload of moneyfive million taxpayer dollars to be exact for a so-called IDSA biased “Clinician Toolkit”  (CDC grant number  NU50CK000597)

This controlling of the narrative has caused unimaginable pain and suffering all across America as insurance companies refuse to pay for long-term treatment, personal bankruptcies from out-of-pocket expenses to treat chronic infection, suicides from despair all while Valneva Received FDA Fast Track Designation for its Lyme Disease Vaccine.

Chronic Lyme must be recognized and finally addressed with 100% attention to effective antimicrobials for all stages of disease.

Question:

Is collusion to control the narrative through suppression of the truth, facts and scientific references a criminal offense?

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Cc: Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter, Attorney Katrina Rouse

Attorneys for the United States Antitrust Division

Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter Announces Task Force on Health Care Monopolies and Collusion
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/assistant-attorney-general-jonathan-kanter-announces-task-force-health-care-monopolies-and

“Every year, Americans spend trillions of dollars on health care, money that is increasingly being gobbled up by a small number of payers, providers and dominant intermediaries that have consolidated their way to power in communities across the country,” said Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division. “Led by Katrina Rouse, the task force will identify and root out monopolies and collusive practices that increase costs, decrease quality and create single points of failure in the health care industry.”

2nd email sent to Marcia McNutt:

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>
To: “mmcnutt@nas.edu” <mmcnutt@nas.edu>, “vdzau@nas.edu” <vdzau@nas.edu>
Cc: “wkearney@nas.edu” <wkearney@nas.edu>, “dmay@nas.edu” <dmay@nas.edu>, “amacdonald@nas.edu” <amacdonald@nas.edu>
Date: 05/15/2025 9:14 AM EDT
Subject: Re: The National Academies Press; Charting a Path Toward New Treatments for Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illness

Dear Marcia McNutt,

Please see the inquiry below addressed to Dr. Raymond Dattwyler …..

Dr. Raymond Dattwyler owns 24 patents for Lyme disease that include diagnostic testing and vaccines both live bacteria and oral. Raymond Dattwyler, Benjamin Luft, et al have some interesting comments in their application for a Lyme related patent… 

Dattwyler et al. United States Patent 7,605,248 October 20, 2009
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/1yxcrwjfhhw4q47999dug/Raymond-Dattwyler-Grant-2R01AI37256-05A1-from-the-National-Institute-of-Allergy-and-Infectious-Diseases..docx

“Currently, Lyme Disease is treated with a range of antibiotics, e.g., tetracyclines, penicillin and cephalosporins. However, such treatment is not always successful in clearing the infectionTreatment is often delayed due to improper diagnosis with the deleterious effect that the infection proceeds to a chronic condition, where treatment with antibiotics is often not useful. One of the factors contributing to delayed treatment is the lack of effective diagnostic tools.”

2022 Inquiry to Dr. Raymond Dattwyler: 

———- Original Message ———-
From: CARL TUTTLE <runagain@comcast.net>To: Raymond_Dattwyler@nymc.eduCc: npjvaccines@nature.com, abarrett@utmb.edu, R.W.Titball@exeter.ac.uk, mgomesso@uthsc.eduDate: 01/06/2023 2:46 PM EST
Subject: The year that shaped the outcome of the OspA vaccine for human Lyme disease

npj Vaccines Jan 2022

The year that shaped the outcome of the OspA vaccine for human Lyme disease
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41541-022-00429-5
Raymond J. Dattwyler & Maria Gomes-Solecki

Department of Microbiology and Immunology
New York Medical College
Valhalla, NY
Raymond J. Dattwyler, Corresponding Author

Dear Dr. Dattwyler,

I read your manuscript with great interest as you call attention to a treatment-resistant Lyme arthritis with “no evidence of DNA” found in the joints of patients after antibiotic treatment.

For some strange reason however, I could not find the following 1995 publication within your paper identifying treatment-resistant neuroborreliosis: 

European Neurology 1995

Seronegative Chronic Relapsing Neuroborreliosis
https://www.karger.com/Article/Abstract/117104
Lawrence C., Lipton R.B., Lowy F.D., Coyle P.K.d

Abstract

We report an unusual patient with evidence of Borrelia burgdorferi infection who experienced repeated neurologic relapses despite aggressive antibiotic therapy. Each course of therapy was associated with a Jarisch-Herxheimer-like reaction. Although the patient never had detectable free antibodies to B. burgdorferi in serum or spinal fluid, the CSF was positive on multiple occasions for complexed anti-B. burgdorferi antibodies, B. burgdorferi nucleic acids and free antigen. 

In fact, Dr. Dattwyler there seems to be a great deal of “treatment-resistant” evidence published in multiple journals over the past three decades:

Peer Reviewed Evidence of Persistence of Lyme Disease Spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi and Tick-Borne Diseases (700 References)
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n09sk90eo6xz7ua/700%20articles%20LYME%20EvidenceofPersistence-V2.pdf?dl=0

So that brings me to the reason for this email…

Question:

Does a chronic relapsing seronegative disease fit the vaccine model? If not, would that, in and of itself, be the hidden reason for denying chronic (treatment-resistant) Lyme disease for almost three decades? In other words, patent royalties and pharmaceutical profits over lifesaving care?

A response to this inquiry is requested.

Carl Tuttle
Hudson, NH

Cc: Alan D.T. Barrett, PhD Editor-in-Chief
Rick Titball, PhD, DSc, Deputy Editor

Letter to the Editor of the BMJ published June 2020
https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1041/rr-1

_______________

**Comment**

Once again, kudos and a big ‘thank you’ go out to Lyme advocate Carl Tuttle for being a junk yard dog that refuses to let go of the jugular vein.

Tuttle has been tireless in writing letters and exposing Oz behind the Lyme curtain: repeated denial and cover-up of chronic, relapsing Lyme disease.

I posted the ‘new treatments for Lyme Infection-Associated Chronic Illnesses’ here:   https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2025/05/09/charting-a-path-towards-new-treatments-for-chronic-lyme-disease/

I had a sinking feeling then that this would amount to nothing but further entrenchment in the old, antiquated and unscientific Lyme narrative.  It appears I was correct.  I included the old 2014 interview with Willy Burgdorfer, which I repost here, where he states research must be started over at square one because the same people have been doing the research and coming up with the same results – nothing!

http://  Approx. 5 Min

Willy Burgdorfer 2014

“Money goes to people that have for the past 30 years produced the same thing.  Nothing.” ~  Willy Burgdorfer

Well, it’s now been a total of more than 40 years and the same thing is being produced, which is nothing.

For more:

‘Must Hear’ Dr. Hatfill Interview

http://  Approx. 1 Hour

Dr. Steven Hatfill Blows Whistle on COVID Treatments, Gene Therapy Injections, and Research Fraud

“They lied!”

Podcast by Dana Parish

May, 2025

This is one of the most shocking interviews I’ve ever done. Dr. Steven Hatfill, renowned virologist, bioweapons expert, author, and senior scientific adviser to HHS, joins me to reveal the debacle behind COVID, the ‘vaccine,’ early treatments, and what really happened behind the scenes during the pandemic.

Hatfill was wrongfully accused of the anthrax attacks in the early 2000s and later exonerated, earning a multi-million dollar settlement from the US Government. But that didn’t stop him from stepping back into the fire. During the first Trump administration, he became a fierce advocate for early COVID treatment while the mainstream medical establishment tried to silence him.

In this episode, he lays out the evidence on how COVID was bioengineered, early treatments were suppressed, the vaccines were entirely misrepresented, and much more.

_____________

**Comment**

No, you are not losing your mind.  I’ve posted this podcast before here:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2025/05/14/study-confirms-covid-shots-laced-with-cancer-causing-dna/

I just felt it important enough to repost as some might have missed it.

And you don’t want to miss this one.

Dr. Hatfill answers all of Parish’s questions humbly and honestly.  I’m happy to report that everything posted on this website on the COVID chapter aligns with what Dr. Hatfill says in this interview.  I am indebted to doctors and researchers who shared prolifically on Linkedin early on.  Many of these experts are retired or not employed by the government and could speak freely.  Unfortunately, one by one, Linked in kicked these truth-tellers off the platform until one day I too was ‘disappeared.’  

Shame on platforms for censoring experts sharing information that could have saved lives.

The entire COVID chapter was mishandled from the start and there’s many people and organizations who need to be brought to justice over the fraud, deceit, and damage done in virtually every area.

And now, the IPAK-EDU White Paper 2025-ENDEUA states that when corrected efficacy curves and suppressed risks are taken into account, the mRNA covid shots fail the EUA standard.  The shots were based upon interim data from large-scale Phase III trials. The legal standard under §564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires that a product may be authorized for emergency use only if it is “reasonable to believe” that the product “may be effective” against a life-threatening condition, that the known and potential benefits outweigh the known and potential risks, and that no adequate alternatives are available. This report demonstrates, through a rigorous retrospective analysis, that these criteria were never met.

Trust me when I say, you need to hear this interview.  Please also share this widely, particularly to those who are still in the dark or need to hear it from an ‘expert.’  Hatfill knows his stuff.

For articles on the many topics Hatfill covers:

COVID is lab made:

Suppression of early, successful treatment:

How spike protein behaves in the body:

Is the shot gene therapyYES

Why was mRNA the government choice for COVID?

    • There are 9,613 patents licensed to giants in biotech and the US government
    • BARDA and DARPA have had a torrid love affair with mRNA for decades
    • retrospective cohort study found the US government invested at least $31.9B to develop, produce, and purchase mRNA covid-19 shots, including sizable investments in the three decades before the pandemic through March 2022. 
    • While the study claims “millions of lives were saved,” the truth is the experimental, COVID gene therapy injections saved ZERO lives.

Links between COVID shots & Cancer

Nasal sprays to prevent COVID:

Persecution of doctors & health professionals who defied the global narrative:

HHS to End COVID Shot Recommendations for Kids & Pregnant Women

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/breaking-hhs-to-end-covid-19-vaccine

BREAKING: HHS to END COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendations for Kids & Pregnant Women

With over 600,000 estimated COVID shot deaths in the U.S., HHS moves to roll back CDC guidance—amid mounting criminal referrals, legislative efforts, and growing calls for a complete moratorium.

According to the Wall Street Journalthe Trump administration—under the leadership of HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.—is preparing to end routine CDC recommendations that pregnant women, teenagers, and children receive COVID-19 vaccines. This decision, expected to be announced in the coming days, represents a long-overdue departure from current ill-advised CDC guidance, which still urges vaccination for everyone aged six months and older, including during pregnancy.

This is a critical first step—but the work is far from over.

We must continue pressing for the removal of all COVID-19 vaccine recommendations. No one is spared from the deadly effects of these injections. Healthy young adults, seniors, athletes, mothers, and children alike have suffered devastating injuries—many of them irreversible. A truly ethical public health system does not tolerate collateral damage in exchange for failed mass vaccination strategies. It’s time to stop pretending these shots are safe and effective for anyone.  (See link for article and graphics)

_____________

For more:

I could go onto infinity with this.

It’s time to stop the shots!