Lyme disease, which is caused by infection with Borrelia burgdorferi and related species, can lead to inflammatory pathologies affecting the joints, heart, and nervous systems including the central nervous system (CNS). Inbred laboratory mice have been used to define the kinetics of B. burgdorferi infection and host immune responses in joints and heart, however similar studies are lacking in the CNS of these animals. A tractable animal model for investigating host-Borrelia interactions in the CNS is key to understanding the mechanisms of CNS pathogenesis. Therefore, we characterized the kinetics of B. burgdorferi colonization and associated immune responses in the CNS of mice during early and subacute infection. Using fluorescence-immunohistochemistry, intravital microscopy, bacterial culture, and quantitative PCR, we found B. burgdorferi routinely colonized the dura mater of C3H mice, with peak spirochete burden at day 7 post-infection. Dura mater colonization was observed for several Lyme disease agents including B. burgdorferi, B. garinii, and B. mayonii. RNA-sequencing and quantitative RT-PCR showed that B. burgdorferi infection was associated with increased expression of inflammatory cytokines and a robust interferon (IFN) response in the dura mater. Histopathologic changes including leukocytic infiltrates and vascular changes were also observed in the meninges of infected animals. In contrast to the meninges, we did not detect B. burgdorferi, infiltrating leukocytes, or large-scale changes in cytokine profiles in the cerebral cortex or hippocampus during infection; however, both brain regions demonstrated similar changes in expression of IFN-stimulated genes as observed in peripheral tissues and meninges. Taken together, B. burgdorferi is capable of colonizing the meninges in laboratory mice, and induces localized inflammation similar to peripheral tissues. A sterile IFN response in the absence of B. burgdorferi or inflammatory cytokines is unique to the brain parenchyma, and provides insight into the potential mechanisms of CNS pathology associated with this important pathogen.
Author summary
Lyme disease is a result of inflammation-induced tissue pathology in response to infection with Borrelia burgdorferi. A major barrier to progress in understanding the neurologic manifestations of Lyme disease has been a lack of a tractable laboratory animal model to evaluate the mechanisms of central nervous system pathogenesis. Here we addressed this barrier by characterizing for the first time the kinetics of Borrelia burgdorferi colonization in the meninges of laboratory mice, and the resulting immune responses in both the meninges and brain. We demonstrate the presence and kinetics of live spirochetes in the meninges of infected mice, and show that meningeal infection is a general phenomenon shared by several Lyme disease Borrelia species. Meningeal colonization was associated with infiltrating leukocytes and local changes in immune response genes previously shown to be associated with Lyme disease pathology. Intriguingly, we show increased expression of immune response genes including those involved in antigen presentation in the brain, despite a lack of detectable infiltrating bacteria or leukocytes in this tissue. Overall, these findings characterize the central nervous system responses to Borrelia burgdorferi infection in a cost-effective and genetically robust animal model, and provide insights into the mechanisms of neuropathologies associated with Lyme disease.
__________________
**Comment**
Although this was in mice, patients the world over have experienced inflammation in the brain, including yours truly. I wondered if I’d ever have a day without head and neck pain that honestly felt like a horse kicked me. Thankfully, integrated, persistent treatment resolved this issue. I also have met numerous patients who ended up with a Chiari diagnosis due to the effects of undiagnosed Lyme/MSIDS, so the results of this inflammation can be severe: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2016/04/02/chiari/
The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe
Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that coached him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis incorrectly
The notion of asymptomatic spread turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy or a threat, furthering fear and control
The artificially imposed state of incoherence that’s been enacted during the pandemic is described as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots
Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which is being violated as people are forced to get experimental shots
Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom
Prior to 2020, if you heard the term “lockdown” you might think of something that happens in a prison — not in a free society. This mechanism of control has since become commonplace — not among prisoners but among the free — with repercussions that are only beginning to be understood.
The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe. Already banned by Facebook and YouTube,1 the film starts at the beginning of the pandemic, when we were told lockdowns were necessary to “flatten the curve.”
This was supposed to be a short-term, 15-day event in the U.S., but the narrative soon changed to ongoing restrictions. As Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, explained, people have historically quarantined the sick, but quarantining healthy people, as has occurred for the past two years, has no scientific backing or historic precedence.2
“Given this virus represents, at most, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than seasonal influenza, and a less risk, a smaller risk, to almost everyone else who’s younger and fit,” Yeadon says, “it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn’t need to do anything — lockdowns, masks, testing, vaccines even.”3
Questionable Practices Urged for COVID-19 Diagnosis
Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that seemed to be coaching him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis in situations where he wouldn’t have previously used influenza or any other specific viral diagnosis without first testing for it. He said:4
“What struck me right away was I felt like I was being coached to go ahead and use COVID-19 without using the same standards of precision that I would for other things. If I’m going to make a diagnosis, I believe as a physician I have an obligation to use the tools available to me to nail it down with as much certainty as possible.
And it seemed to me that the Department of Health, and the link to this CDC document that said you could diagnose COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate … those two documents, in tandem, went against everything that I had been taught or doing for the last 35 years.”
Even Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Health, is featured in the film stating that even if you died of a clear alternate cause, if you had COVID-19 at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. “Everyone who is listed as a COVID death, doesn’t mean that was the cause of the death,” she says.5
In January 2020, the PCR test for COVID-19 came out, which allowed health officials to define COVID-19 “cases.” If the test was positive, it counted as a case — it didn’t matter if you have symptoms or not. Reiner Fuellmich, global fraud attorney, founder of the Corona Investigative Committee, pointed out, “It’s never, in the history of mankind, in the history of medicine, there’s never been testing of healthy people.”6
Yeadon agrees that mass testing of people with no symptoms has no scientific basis. Rather, he says, “It’s just a way to frighten people.”7 The rising “cases,” based on PCR testing, is what built the crisis. But counting cases was only measuring the activity of testing; the more that testing occurred, the more cases that were found.
‘Fear Everyone’ Became the Message
June 8, 2020, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced that asymptomatic people could transmit COVID-19. That same day, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that people who have COVID-19 without any symptoms “rarely” transmit the disease to others. In a dramatic about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement just one day later.8
In the days that followed, media and health officials ramped up fear by claiming that you could be sickened by virtually anyone, even when they appeared to be healthy. “This idea that … you can be ill even though you have no symptoms and you can be a … virus threat to someone else even though you have no symptoms, that’s also invented in 2020,” Yeadon says.9
Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist, former director of research with the French National Institute of Health, is among those who have noticed something off from the start. “I was very puzzled since the very beginning … I was alert to the fact that what we were living was not quite right.”10
She notes that the notion of asymptomatic spread is terrifying because it turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy, because they could be exposing you to SARS-CoV-2.
“This is actually terrible because it denies the capacity of a person to be a healthy person. Because if asymptomatic [spread] exists, then who is healthy? No one.”
What’s more, the “proof” of asymptomatic spread is flawed and fraudulent. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article suggesting the transmission of COVID-19 is possible from an asymptomatic carrier in January 2020.11
It was based on a 33-year-old businessman who had met with his business partner from Shanghai, then developed a fever and productive cough. The next evening, he felt better and went back to work January 27.
The writers reported the partner had been “well with no signs or symptoms of infection, but had become ill on her flight back to China, where she tested positive for 2019-nCoV on January 26.” From this case study, they theorized the virus could be transmitted from asymptomatic carriers. An important point was left out, which is that the researchers did not speak with the partner from Shanghai before publication.
However, Germany’s public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), did speak with the woman on the phone, and she reported she did have symptoms while in Germany.12 So she was not asymptomatic after all.
In a State of Incoherence, People Crave Normalcy
The pandemic has twisted reality, leaving the public in a mental fog. “You’re regularly pledging obedience to things which are not logical,” Catherine Austin-Fitts, assistant secretary, Bush Sr. administration and investment adviser with Solari, Inc., says.13WHO has changed definitions of herd immunity and pandemic, literally altering reality, and this is just one example.
Censorship and campaigns to discredit those who speak out against the narrative are additional control mechanisms that distort the truth. Bishop Schneider of Kazakhstan says the pandemic measures are very similar to Soviet times where he lived, in that there was only one narrative, and if you said there was another meaning, you were declared an enemy.
“When you had another opinion, they said, ‘You are a conspiracy group. You have a conspiracy theory. You have hate speech. This expression, hate speech, came from the communists.”14 It’s psychological manipulation, based on fear, which makes people act totally irrational. The artificially imposed state of incoherence was even described by Austin-Fitts as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots:15
“Human beings crave coherence. And so if you can put them in a state of incoherence they will literally do anything they can to get back to coherence. It’s a typical torture tactic. ‘If you just do what I want, I will allow you to go back to a state of coherence.’ So, if you just accept the [vaccine] passports, you’ll be free. Or if you get the vaccination, you’ll just be free.”
Further, by declaring small businesses as “nonessential” during lockdowns, they get shut down, while Amazon, Walmart and other big box stores can take over their market share. A major transfer of wealth occurred away from small family-owned businesses to very large, publicly owned businesses that benefited from the digital economy. In the meantime, Austin-Fitts explains:16
“The people on Main St. have to keep paying off their credit cards or their mortgage, so they’re in a debt trap and they’re desperate to get cashflow to cover their debts and expenses.
In the meantime, you have the Federal Reserve institute a form of quantitative easing where they’re buying corporate bonds, and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance — or their banks can — at 0% to 1%, when everyone on Main St. is paying 16% to 17% to their credit cards, without income.
So basically now you’ve got them over a barrel and you can take away their market share, and generally they can’t afford to do what they say because they’re too busy trying to find money to feed their kids.”
New Control Systems Are Being Engineered
If a few people want to control many, how can you get the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them realizing and resisting? “The perfect thing,” Austin-Fitts says, is invisible enemies, like viruses.17 This ramps up fear so the public believes they need the government to protect them. Another effective tactic is “divide and conquer,” and the media plays an important role in this, dividing people over shots and masks, for instance.
“What COVID-19 is,” Austin-Fitts explains, “is the institution of controls necessary to convert the planet from the democratic process to technocracy. So what we’re watching is a change in control and an engineering of new control systems. So think of this as a coup d’état. It’s much more like a coup d’état than a virus.”18
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former public health official and member of German parliament, agrees, stating that pandemic responses have “nothing to do with hygiene. It has to do with criminology.“19 The global injection campaign is another form of control, one that’s forcing the public to receive experimental shots.
Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.
But in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the shots — which are only beginning to be uncovered. People are being forced into the shots due to mandates and loss of jobs and personal freedoms, like the ability to travel freely and attend business and social events.
In the End, Truth Will Win
A revolution is occurring, and the experts are hopeful that people will awaken to common sense and resist the totalitarian control that is threatening to take over the globe. Instead, society can be regenerated if people come together and fight back against the encroachment on our liberties.
Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom. “If they want to make us a machine, if they want to make us slaves, we say no,” Wodarg says. “… We don’t need you anymore, we are many … we don’t have to be afraid of any pandemic.”20
About the Director
I believe in bringing quality to my readers, which is why I wanted to share some information about the filmmaker, James Patrick, from “Planet Lockdown.” Here is a little more about him and what went in to making this film. Thank you James for sharing with us.
What was your inspiration for making this film?
I was in Spain when the lockdowns started, studying a PHD in economics. I escaped to southern France and a week later back to the states. I immediately saw the lockdowns as an economic takedown of the middle class rather than a virus mitigation strategy.
I looked into the academic reference of lockdown as a strategy and they were only mentioned twice and strongly recommended against as the damages would be worse than any benefit.
As an ancestor of Patrick Henry and passionate lover of human liberty, I was so upset by the lockdowns and what they meant for our future, I needed to do something about it. Within a few months I embarked on making a documentary film. The situation developed so quickly I began putting the full interviews out and it became an interview series as well.
I was able to get the best and brightest experts in the world to sit down and tell me their story. It is a high level, intimate look at what happened these last two years, from 2 weeks of lockdown to flatten the curve to Lockouts for the unvaccinated.
What do you hope people take away from the film?
The film takes the viewer on a journey through the whole COVID saga. The film and the full interviews forms an educational body of work that helps the public understand what is going on, how we got here, where are we and where this is headed if we don’t put a stop to this. Enough damage has been done. We have to make sure this never happens again or a lot worse things will happen.
Where do the proceeds to your film go?
Proceeds to the project go to cover the expenses of the film and ongoing interview series. These include travel, equipment, and payment for cameramen, sound, edits, audio technicians and web hosting expenses. We have done this project on a shoestring budget and donations are critical to keeping this high quality content coming to earn the public about what is happening and what is to come.
No other film project is addressing the situation from an international perspective, which is required to have a full understanding of what is happening. This is a global operation. We work with colleagues in UK, EU and Africa to capture the situation. We are doing this project as a public service and it isn’t free. To date it has been driven by people contributing their time unpaid, myself especially, so donations help covers these out of pocket expenses incurred.
— Court-ordered release runs risk of “cherry picking and taking things out of context”
by Amanda D’Ambrosio, Enterprise & Investigative Writer, MedPage Today March 7, 2022
The FDA turned over thousands of documents related to its review of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine last week, marking the first of several releases mandated by a court in Texas earlier this year.
The agency released 55,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine review documents last Tuesday, following a loss in court months earlier that forced it to expedite its process to make the information available to the public. In a January court order, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released — totaling more than 300,000 pages. (See link for article)
Nine pages of side effects listed, some have not been confirmed. Nearly 159,000 side effects were listed which means each person on average reported 3-4 different side-effects.
Reporting is voluntary and the magnitude of under reporting is unknown; however, if we are to look at a 2011 report by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, VAERS only captures fewer than 1% of adverse reactions. It also only captures less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events, and only 1-13% of serious events are reported to the FDA. Historically, under reporting is prolific.
Dr. Jesse Santiano lists the Pfizer adverse events of “special interest” and states these are events that should be monitored by the drug or “vaccine” company. The events can be severe or not serious, but can lead to a serious medical condition. He also states that more than 95% of the events listed are negatively impacting and life-changing. Most doctors and nurses are unaware of this list, created by Pfizer itself on conditions to look for after people get COVID shots. Anyone getting these or other reactions (not listed) should report them to Pfizer and VAERS even if you received a shot from a different manufacturer. Dr. Santiano has listed the conditions in alphabetical order, many with links for you to read about them, as well as research articles. You should also check out his updated list of COVID articles – all great resources.
SUMMARY:
It took a nonprofit suing the FDA for COVID shot data to be released to the public.
The FDA redacts confidential business and private info as well as trade secrets.
The court concluded the release of data is of “paramount public importance” that is “necessary”.
The article is quick to point out that “anti-vax” advocates have already capitalized on the release of data and immediately calls out Children’s Health Defense, run by John F. Kennedy who has stated repeatedly he is not “anti-vax,” yet facts be damned. It’s more important to name calland bully than present facts.
Predictably, the FDA is very worried about people cherry-picking data, which ironically is also supposedly why the CDC was recently caught red-handed withholding data for more than a year. This is where we should hear the booming voice of Colonel Jessup in “A Few Good Men”:http://
Then, Medpage finger points at specific doctors they state are “known for spreading false or misleading information during the pandemic.” The bullying and name calling is tangible. And now, the Feds are giving Big Tech until May 3, 2022 to rat out those engaging in “misinformation,” with the new FDA chief throwing his weight behind it too.
Speaking of “cherry picking”, the CDC reports that 6 months of U.S. Data finds adverse events caused by COVID shots to be “minor and transient,” and that few patients sought medical care. This mirage is quite easy to create when you just simply deny causality between the injections and the adverse events and deaths. Similarly with Lyme/MSIDS, the CDC uses it’s own study to stamp out any threat to their narrative that COVID ‘vaccines’ are ‘safe and effective’ and are the only recourse despite effectivetreatments that are heavily censored and banned. CDC’s Walensky belatedly admitted that they relied too heavily of ‘vaccines’ as a “cure all,” suspiciously right before mid-term elections.
Reality; however, paints a far different picture:
“They coded the deaths. They said, “Did the vaccine cause [death] or was there some other cause? 86% of the time, there’s no other cause. 50% of the deaths occur within two days of taking the shot; 80% occur within a week.” ~ Dr McCullough
Now in March, 2022 we find that a CDC peer-reviewed study shows that COVID injection DEATHS represent 1.3% of reported side-effects and 6.6% were serious. This of course led the CDC to quietly adjust their metrics for measuring COVID risk, purposely manipulating to make it appear the pandemic was easing up. We went from 90% of the country in high-risk red zones to overnight, having less than 30% of the country in high-risk orange zones. The CDC constantlymanipulates and withholds data. Remember that historically VAERS only gets about a 1% capture rate.
But the CDC is far from alone. For decades the FDA has allowed drug companies to cherry-pick data to get approval for drugs. When a drug fails, Big Pharma only publishes papers with positive results and sweeps the negative ones under the rug. A 2013 book settles the point conclusively: industry research only gives positive results. And this well-written article in Frontiers states that Big Pharma takes advantage of medical science by doing it’s own research and smoothly integrating it with medical science. This has been blatantly seen in the era of COVID.
FDA “cherry-picked” evidence to push cloned-animal foods, and downplayed evidence of health risks.
The FDA has been accused of using back-channels to get expensive, ineffective drugs approved.
The FDA ignores data and gives Pfizer shots a favorable conclusion. Number of doses (denominator) was redacted, preventing any computation of rates and risks. Isn’t that convenient? This also means the FDA may be in contempt of court.
AstraZeneca has been accused of including “outdated information” in touting effectiveness. An independent panel scolded the company for “cherry-picking” data.
A pathologist has called out the FDA for “glossing over” potential risks of an mRNA vaccine while concealing its true efficacy. This same pathologist filed a “stay of action” against the FDA for using faulty PCR tests in the “vaccine” trials.
San Diego scientists call out FDA Commissioner over “cherry-picked” COVID plasma data, and that support for the treatment is unfounded.
Regarding boosters, the FDA’s been accused of performing hat tricks, as they made the decision with NO DATA. Further, every member of the ACIP which reviews the level of evidence to vote for boosters has conflicts of interest with vaccine manufacturers.
In this article we learn that Children’s Health Defense Fund has filed a lawsuit against the FDA due to the fact you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That’s against the law, but the government has done it anyway. The request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but CHD is still pursuing the case.
I’m sure there are thousands of more examples, but it’s laughable that the FDA is worried about “cherry-picking” when it does it with abandon.
Let us never forget that when Pfizer applied for FDA approval, they were completely aware of almost 159,000 adverse events but wanted this fact sealed for 75 years.
And these adverse events are not little fevers with some itching or swelling:
Acute kidney injury
Acute flaccid myelitis
Anti-sperm antibody positive
Brain stem embolism
Brain stem thrombosis
Cardiac arrest
Cardiac failure
Cardiac ventricular thrombosis
Cardiogenic shock
Central nervous system vasculitis
Death neonatal
Deep vein thrombosis
Encephalitis brain stem
Encephalitis hemorrhagic
Frontal lobe epilepsy
Foaming at mouth
Epileptic psychosis
Facial paralysis
Fetal distress syndrome
Gastrointestinal amyloidosis
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
Hashimoto’s encephalopathy
Hepatic vascular thrombosis
Herpes zoster reactivation
Immune-mediated hepatitis
Interstitial lung disease
Jugular vein embolism
Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
Liver injury
Low birth weight
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
Myocarditis, neonatal seizure
Pancreatitis, pneumonia
Stillbirth
Tachycardia
Temporal lobe epilepsy
Testicular autoimmunity
Thrombotic cerebral infarction
Type 1 diabetes mellitus
Venous thrombosis neonatal
Vertebral artery thrombosis.
There were 1,246 other medical conditions following the shots, over 25,000 of which were nervous system disorders, 17,000 musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and 14,000 gastrointestinal disorders
The fly in the ointment on COVID shot efficacy
Regarding efficacy, please remember that ‘vaccine’ manufacturers did a ‘slight of hand’ to obtain their highly touted positive results: they simply discarded absolute risk. When absolute risk is included, COVID injections are 1% or less effective. They also purposely omitted those with natural immunity because those who have recovered from COVID are at risk for a hyperimmune response after “vaccination,” and some WILL actually DIE. Big Pharma didn’t want that fact to be exposed. These jabs lose any effectiveness they might have within weeks and don’t work at all for variants.
Dr. Cole states that whatever small benefit(0.345%) the injections had early on during the middle of an epidemic with a fast-moving virus is completely diminished by the fact natural immunity and early treatments, that are far more effective than “vaccines”, were completely neglected and suppressed.
Many do not know that the flu shot is also a “bust” and has been found to be only 16% effective against the predominant strain.
enter cell nuclei, suppressing DNA repair engine of the human body, which could potentially unleash an explosion of cancer, immunodeficiency, autoimmune disorders and accelerated aging
Further, they are using outdated population estimates that grossly under count the actual number of the unvaccinated, which translates into inflated estimates of COVID cases. Second, they appear to be counting every person for whom they cannot verify vaccination stated as unvaccinated which also translates into overstatement of COVID cases in the unvaccinated and the understatement of cases for the ‘vaccinated.‘ Go here for an excellent read on how public health agencies are using fake science to support their narrative. The CDC was recently called out on this.
A German insurance company fires CEO for releasing COVID shot injury data and then scrubs the data from the website.The released data suggests ‘authorities’ are significantly under reporting injuries.
The NIH got Forbes to simply delete a reporter from their employment for simply writing a factual article about Fauci.
A FOIA request showed emails with Fauci and NIH head, Collins, communicating the need for a quick and devastating published take-down of the Great Barrington Declaration. They conspired with the media to this effect and a day later Google began censoring search results for it. Both men have gone on record stating the Declaration is “dangerous,” “ridiculous,” and “total nonsense.”Mainstream and social media giants then began a smear campaign against it and the epidemiologists behind it, calling the Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford doctors “fringe,” despite the fact 928,000 have signed the declaration.
At least 12 mysterious deaths of CDC scientists. Could they have been deleted for knowing too much or threatening to speak up?
These corrupt ‘authorities’ will blame anything but the obvious thing. Further, 6 months does not even begin to answer questions about safety and efficacy on a fast-tracked, experimental – never before used in humansgene therapy that is linked to more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.
Lets review some facts:
FDA FOIA data shows over 1,200 deaths in the first 3 MONTHS of the COVID jab and TENS OF THOUSANDS of adverse events. Please remember in 1976 the Swine flu program was halted in nine states after just 3 deaths. The entire program ended with only 20% of the population vaccinated due to reports of Guillain-Barre.
One in nine adolescents suffered an adverse event.
Myocarditis risk is higher from COVID shots than from COVID. It’s three times higher using Pfizer.
While a multitude of experts stated the ‘pandemic’ was over a year ago, the US Senate just passed a bill to end COVID, which will likely be voted against by the House of Representatives and vetoed by Biden. None of this is shocking as an internal memo shows Biden and the CDC are following advice from a public opinion research firm, not science.
Bought out public health ‘experts’ have detailed a frightening plan focusing on 12 key areas for living with COVID:
expensive MERV 13 filtration or HEPA filters in all public buildings which should be monitored and publicly graded. (imagine the expense and power-grabs if this goes into effect)
another “Warp Speed” program with advanced purchase agreements and incentives(think billions to Big Pharma & our government) to produce an oral antiviral cocktail, despite the fact treatments already exist that are cheap and effective.
keep pushing “vaccines” despite proof the COVID jabs are worthless, dangerous, and don’t stop transmission, infection, hospitalization, or death.
More testing, despite it’s utter failure. They want to track, track, and track some more – further eroding individual freedom.
Under the auspice of “Long COVID” they want a national research program that includes health, “vaccination,” and sociodemograhic data. Another tyrannical power grab for your personal information which isn’t anybody’s business but yours.
Rather than admit COVID “vaccines” are worthless and dangerous, they want to address workforce shortages with a “pool of flexible healthcare workers” rather than rehire workers who chose to forego the shots. (An obvious breach of our constitutional rights & a form of segregation)
Move over cancer: mRNA injections are respawning HIV/AIDS around the globe, while numerous AIDS researchers are suddenly and mysteriously dying
admin
TheCOVIDBlog.com
The face of evil is ever-present.
Two people have been talked about many times on The COVID Blog™ – Dr. Kary Mullis and Dr. Luc Montagnier.
Dr. Mullis is the Nobel Prize-winning biochemist who invented the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. He is also known for his ongoing feud with Fauci in the 1980 and 1990s. Dr. Mullis made clear in the early 1990s that PCR is not a test and can essentially find anything in any living being if you run enough cycles.
He would have gladly challenged Fauci to debates about COVID-19, and that his invention is not a COVID-19 test. But Dr. Mullis mysteriously died on August 7, 2019 at age 74, just a few months before the COVID-19 agenda commenced. Mainstream media barely recognized him or his death, despite his contributions to humanity. This will be an ongoing theme throughout this article.
Mainstream media coverage of Dr. Luc Montagnier’s February 8 death was different than Dr. Mullis’, but with the same motives. The BBC, for instance, described Dr. Montagnier as a “French virologist credited as a co-discoverer of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).” That’s an interesting and disingenuous way of saying Dr. Montagnier created the HIV virus in a lab and patented it in 1989. In fact the very first sentence in the abstract of the patent refers to HIV as “the invention.” (See link for article)
____________________
**Comment**
This is a deep dive into history, but is imperative to understand as it all relates today.
SUMMARY(although I highly recommend reading the entire article with accompanying videos):
While there was contention between Dr. Robert Gallo and Montagnier as to who was the inventor of HIV, Montagnier was given credit, and won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2008.
The article states HIV, a biological weapon, killed countless Africans and Western homosexuals.
While AIDS first presented in homosexual males around 1979-80, as the ‘greatest health scare of the 20th century’,authorities marketed it as being caused by the green monkey, which spread around the world from Africa – similarly to the initial narrative that COVID was a “black disease.” The problem with this narrative is it didn’t appear on the African continent until 1983.
Montagnier went from being a darling to the global elite to a pariah by stating the mRNA and viral vector DNA injections cause COVID variants, and urging people to reject the shots.
AIDS mostly disappeared after the patent expired in 2005 until its recent resurrection and rebooting in 2022.
AIDS, which destroys the immune system, sounds very much like ADE after COVID shots.
Fauci was appointed chief of NIAD in 1980, just in time for AIDS, where the fear-mongering propaganda began in earnest. He warned that routine contact can spread it.(I remember hearing this vividly as a child)
Less than 2 months later he flip-flopped and stated this notion was preposterous. He did this again recently with masks, but both admissions were too little too late as fear dominated, and power-hungry politicians made edicts based on his faulty advice.
Fauci, aka the “Tephlon man,” because nothing ever sticks to him, was rewarded by being promoted to director of NIAD, and has remained since, despite serious allegations.
Similarly with COVID, experts began punching holes in the AIDS narrative. Dr. Robert Strecker discovered by accident that HIV was created in a lab, AIDS is spread by deliberate infection(e.g. Hepatitis B vaccines), pills, water or something else, and kills everyone who contracts it, but that it’s rarely (if ever) transmitted via semen or saliva.
The Feds and researchers laughed at Strecker as general consensus believed only 10% died from AIDS, and they totally swallowed the “green monkey” narrative.
Undaunted, Strecker created “The Bio-Attack Alert” and sent a copy to every governor, the White House, FBI, CIA, and members of Congress. He also created The Strecker Memorandum in 1988 for public viewing on VHS which provided proof that AIDS did not come from nature and is in fact a biological weapon. All of this is eerily similar to the COVIDnarrative.
Dr. Strecker’s brother, Ted, was found dead on August 11, 1988, just a few weeks after The Strecker Memorandum was released, but the official narrative ruled it a suicide. This also is eerily similar to what’s happened to those exposing the truth about COVID.
Dr. Strecker, able to read the hand-writing on the wall, became silent on the issue and died in a car accident at age 71. Both Ted and Dr. Strecker have been erased from history as being AIDS whistleblowers.
The FDA’s approval of AZT in a record setting 20 months is also similar to the experimental, fast-tracked mRNA shots for COVID, both of which bypass the regulatory oversight and transparency of traditional drugs and “vaccines.” Predictably, legislation was put in place protecting manufacturers from liability. How convenient for them.
Homosexual rights activist and Harvard research analyst John Lauritsen tried warning about the flawed and fraudulent clinical trials that led to FDA approval of AZT, just as experts are desperately trying to warn the public about the CDC withholding and skewing data, utilizing flawed and fraudulent clinical trials that led to FDA approval of experimental mRNA shots, as well as “approved” treatments for COVID and others, and exposing fraudulent research used to squash competition. But, history seems to repeat itself and apparently nobody’s listening.
AZT, BTW, cost $8K for a year’s supply in the 90’s, which is equivalent to $17K today – the most expensive drug in U.S. history at the time. Again, it seems history repeats itself with expensive “approved”COVID treatments. There’s no way to know how much money GSK made from AZT or how many actually died from taking it, but homosexual activists state deaths are as high as 300,000 Americans, many of whom were asymptomatic who got deathly ill onlyafter taking the drug.
Indian Researchers were forced to withdraw a Jan. 2020 published a study that found “Uncanny similarit[ies] of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1,” due to “vested interests.” One of the researchers tweeted in May 2021 that they were right the whole time about COVID being man-made and containing HIV genome sequences. This study also had to be deleted as it would have nipped the plandemic in the bud before it even began.
The article then lists many coincidental deaths of HIV/AIDS researchers.
Previous CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield was also a player in the HIV racket as he attempted to create a HIV vaccine based on flawed and faulty research which led to an investigation for scientific fraud and misconduct. The government and government employees, which directly own and profit from patents on organisms, testing, vaccines, and treatmentspredictably concluded there was no misconduct afterall.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 