Ever wonder why masks were mandated? In this clip, retired pharma R&D Exec Sasha Latpova explains that masking induces acidosis within 30 minutes because you are re-inhaling your own CO2. This acidosis triggers positives for PCR as well as illness.
A study published in 4/24 shows that while face masks can filter larger particles and fibers under specific indications, they also carry risks. A review of 24 studies showed:
(63%) had high micro- and nanoplastics (MPs and NPs) release
Go here for a review of every possible study, expert opinion and commentary on masks ever done since the 1920 Kellogg Mask Study which will never be on any of the government or health agency websites.
A brief summary on what they found:
not one study has a control group of healthy people for comparison (this shenanigan is done with ‘vaccine’ studies as well)
there are no peer reviewed studies for healthy people wearing masks
terms like “statistically significant” or “clinically relevant” are no where to be found in any of their literature. “May” or “could” are not good enough
they cite 0 studies which have masks as the only form of source control(usually mixed with hand washing, sanitizer or distancing)
many of the references have no relevance to the actual study
a majority of the above studies are based on anecdotal observations
any study done during the summer as proof is ridiculous as upper respiratory viruses don’t like temps over 80°F
models or mannequins DO NOT provide a adequate substitute for humans
A meta-analysis on 78 studies by Cochrane determined masks probably make little to no difference in the outcome of influenza-like illnesses like COVID. The analysis also reported: “Harms were rarely measured and poorly reported.”
White House Covid Advisor, Dr. Jha, finally admits on a recent zoom call that there’s:
“No study in the world that shows that masks work that well.”
Yet, despite a meta analysis and the admission by the White House COVID adviser, the CDC is the ONLY national or international public health agency that recommends masking two year old children.Listen to CDC Director Rochelle Walensky ramble on and on with pure & utter nonsense. In this important video, Dr. Prasad reads a statement from CDC director Rochelle Walensky and then states the following:
“She’s just making things up. She’s good at making things up. She made up the fact that there’s credible data that we should mask kids between 2 and 5 even though UNICEF and the WHO said not to do that. She made that up. She makes up lots of things, because she doesn’t actually use science to guide decision making, she just likes to make things up.” ~ Dr. Vinay Prasad
Masks Again?! Here’s What Current Science Says About Mask Efficacy.
Dr. Champion PhD discusses the recent push to reinstitute mask mandates and shares with you the current state of science on the effectiveness, or lack thereof, concerning masks. Be prepared with the facts! Dave also shares how sharing the science behind the question of mask efficacy was a significant element leading to YouTube shutting down his channel.
Read this hilarious account of how alpacas did their own searching and cataloging of all the mask studies.
Highlights:
the alpacas looked for randomized controlled trials – you know, the way we normally evaluate medical interventions
the alpacas found 18 (RCTs) on masks between 2008 and 2019, which is 18 more than Todd the CDC Intern managed to find when he compiled the CDC web page about masks
the article provides a quick summary of each one – with references and links at the end
Conclusion: Since the CDC clearly can’t read, the alpacas ask if someone could please transmit this information verbally to them. For the 18 studies, we have:
9 with no statistically significant benefit of masks
4 with no unmasked control
0 with a positive result vs. unmasked control
2 with a negative result vs. unmasked control
3 with “may help” vs. unmasked control (but not a statistically significant result)
Of the 14 studies with a “no mask” control, 9 showed no benefit, 3 showed weak evidence of benefit, and 2 showed strong evidence of harm.
The evidence that masks can be harmful is at least as strong as the evidence they may help.
None of this justifies forcing anyone to do anything.
Article excerpts:
And now the dirty little secret no one talks about
A lot of studies look for lab confirmed influenza because it’s a common virus and people get infected with it every flu season. Some of the studies also use one or more clinical definitions of influenza, meaning they have doctors diagnose people for illness (defined as fever plus symptoms).
Here is the point of this whole post
In several studies, the rate of diagnosed illness is higher in the mask group even though the lab confirmed influenza isn’t. These people aren’t faking it – they really have fevers and sore throats, it’s just not from influenza virus. And it’s often a statistically significant result.
But these studies are testing for lab confirmed influenza virus, so they don’t test for other things. The masks made these people sick but we don’t know why. Was it from other viruses? Bacteria? Fungi? Was it from breathing the chemicals in the masks? We don’t know, but we should be concerned.
Based on these studies, we have good reason to think that wearing masks all day will make more people sick.
And that’s the dirty little mask secret no one talks about.
________________
Please also see this short video put out by America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLD) on the ineffectiveness of masks.
Similarly to the useless (negative efficacy) and dangerous COVID gene therapy shot, which don’t stop transmission, infection, severe illness, or even death, zealots simply don’t care.
The CDC refuses to fix it’s horriblyflawed mask study which is being still being used to set public health policy, and the CDC and the FDA are completely guilty of mis or disinformation, yet are still coming after others who disagree with their fraudulent narrative.
The current administration has been found guilty of colluding with social media companies to suppress freedom of speech under the guise of ‘misinformation,’ and nearly got away with a DHS ‘ministry of truth’ type disinformation board run by ‘Scary Poppins’ until the public gave fierce backlash. And now the UN is declaring war on “conspiracy theories” and launches a #thinkbeforesharing campaign. UNESCO has teamed up with Twitter, the European Commission and the World Jewish Congress to launch the campaign.
LEAKED Docs Reveal DHS Plotting To Criminalize MISINFORMATION Online
Robby Soave weighs in on revelations that the Department of Homeland Security appears to be doubling down on its effort to curb free speech by influencing big tech platforms. #bigtech#freespeech#DHS
It appears that censorship is “the new normal” with the U.S. desperately wanting to emulate China despite its failed Zero-COVID policy with CCP leaders now sick and dying from COVID despite high “vaccination” rates, mandatory mask wearing and lockdowns, clearly demonstrating the futility of these endeavors.
Demonstrating the vast censorship, the following clip has independent journalist and Grayzone founder Max Blumenthal and American journalist Wyatt Reed sitting down with Clayton Morris to discuss how they were disinvited to the Web Summit in Lisbon, Portugal which brings together 70,000+ people and companies that are “redefining the tech industry.” It’s also called “Davos For Geeks.”
The EMPIRE strikes back after The Grayzone exposes their corruption
Scroll to 4:00 to hear about what is behind the Web Summit – the severe conflicts of interest between governments and tech companies. Ukranian President, Volodymyr Zelensky’s wife personally lobbied for Grayzone’s disinvitation, threatening that commercial interests would pull out of the conference. Both China and Ukraine have had complete control over the information space for ages. Grayzone continues to expose media lies, shady Western aid, and leaked documents, which the establishment considers a threat. The journalists simply need to be eliminated so questions aren’t asked. It now appears the U.S. desires this same complete control over information as the leaked documents reveal.
The following video highlights why Grayzone had to disappear from the summit:
Max Blumenthal & Aaron Mate Slam Mainstream Media Disinfo at Collision Toronto
At the Collision tech conference in Toronto on 6/21/22, before a hostile audience filled with members of the corporate press, The Grayzone’s Max Blumenthal and Aaron Mate explain how the mainstream media is the most prolific source of disinformation on the planet, working closely with the national security state to cultivate public support for war while deflecting scrutiny from the oligarchy that controls it.
All of this must be understood as it affects everything reported by mainstream media including Lyme/MSIDS, COVID, masks, politics, public health, everything.
Kids are losing their childhoods to Lyme and other TBD
My name is Olivia Goodreau. I am the founder of the LivLyme Foundation, and inventor of the free global app TickTracker and my new free symptom tracking app, the LongHaulTracker.
Six years ago when I was 12, I spoke at the very first Tick-Borne Disease Working Group meeting in Washington, DC.
I am so grateful for the opportunity to speak at the first and the last Tick-Borne Disease Working Group meetings.
I am here today to ask all the members to please not forget about the children that have lost their childhood to tick-borne illnesses. The hundreds of thousands of kids who right now are being misdiagnosed with behavior issues, autism, chronic fatigue, or are just told they are making it up for attention.
I was and am one of those kids. It would take 18 months and 51 doctors before I had a positive Lyme test.
During the 18 months I had hundreds of blood draws, liver biopsy, MRI, cat scans, spinal taps–the list goes on. I was told I had Wilson’s disease and would be dead at 40. Then I was told I just needed to drink more water. Finally, the doctors said I was making it up for attention.
I don’t know a single child that wants to be sick. My tick-borne illnesses robbed me of my childhood, took away all of my sports, my friends, I was bullied, and I missed months of school.
Looks can be deceiving
People to this day say, “But she looks fine!!” Yes, I might look fine, but underneath my skin there is a war raging. Lately my brain fog, my word scramble and my tremor in my right hand have become some things I can’t hide from my friends & family. It never ends.
In the US, 200 kids are diagnosed with Lyme disease every day. That is four school buses of children a day. Think how many are going misdiagnosed every single day.
At LivLyme we asked 767 grant applicant families, from 49 different states, three questions:
Out of 767 families, 409 families have more than one child with a tick-borne disease.
Out of 767 families, 307 moms and 61 dads have Lyme disease.
Out of 767 families, 287 moms believe they transmitted Lyme disease to their child in utero.
We will have generations of kids to come that will be struggling with tick borne diseases, whether they were bitten by a tick or contracted Lyme in utero.
What I ask is that you help save the next generations of kids. It’s what I said six years ago, but we need a better tests, better drugs, and better doctor education.
I lost my childhood to one tick bite. I ask this group to help save the children from the devastation of a tick-borne illnesses. I ask the Federal Government to make it a priority to protect innocent kids from ticks and the diseases they carry. I ask Congress to implement the recommendations of the TBDWG immediately.
All kids deserve the opportunity to have a healthy childhood, free from tick-borne diseases, and so that they can just be a kid.
Thank you for your time, and always check for ticks.
Another unbelievably frustrating story in Lymeland.
Unfortunately, the Federal government is not our answer, nor will it ever be. It is part of the problem.
We’ve helped fund our own research through the Federal government for decades to no avail. We need to fund our own independent research in a parallel world to get our own answers.
Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (ACA) is a late and chronic manifestation of Lyme borreliosis (LB). ACA predominantly involves the distal portions of extremities and is characterized by chronic cutaneous atrophy. Unlike other skin manifestations of Lyme disease, including erythema migrans (EM) and borrelial lymphocytoma (BL), ACA does not spontaneously resolve. If untreated, ACA may progress from bluish-red discoloration and inflammation to chronic atrophy and fibrosis, with the late-stage being more treatment-resistant.
ACA was first described in 1883 by Buchwald in Germany, and cases were later reported in 1895 in North America. The diagnosis of ACA is based on clinical presentation, as well as serologic testing and histopathologic confirmation. Recognizing ACA is often challenging due to variable latency in disease onset following the primary borrelial infection, and lack of symptoms leading to delay in seeking treatment.
Lyme borreliosis is the most common vector-borne disease in the northeastern United States. It is a multisystem disease caused by the spirochete Borrelia burgdorferi.It is transmitted to humans via an Ixodes tick bite. There are 3 skin manifestations of LB: Erythema migrans (stage 1) with a characteristic “bull’s eye rash,” which, if untreated, can be followed by early disseminated infection, borrelial lymphocytoma (stage 2) along with neurologic and cardiac abnormalities, and late infection, especially arthritis in North America or acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans (stage 3) in Europe. Acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans is the most common late and chronic manifestation of LB. Approximately 20% of patients with ACA have a history of spontaneously healed EM, usually on an extremity where the ACA lesion developed 6 months to 8 years later.
While ‘the powers that be’ continue to want to confine this complex illness within numerical stages and a “one size fits all” box, please know that patients have jumped from stage to stage in no particular order, with some requiring much longer courses of antibiotics/treatments.