CDC Refuses to Post the Fix to Its Mask Study

We have published many rigorous and trustworthy high-quality evidence pieces across the last two years to show that the COVID lockdowns, school closures, face masks, and mask mandates were ineffective and even harmful in terms of curbing infection and deaths (see here, here, here). A very recent Johns Hopkins review by Herby et al. did an exemplary job at reviewing the evidence and declaring what we have always stated, this being that lockdowns had no impact on mortality.

“Lockdowns in the spring of 2020 had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality…lockdowns during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic have had devastating effects. They have contributed to reducing economic activity, raising unemployment, reducing schooling, causing political unrest, contributing to domestic violence, loss of life quality, and the undermining of liberal democracy. These costs to society must be compared to the benefits of lockdowns, which our meta-analysis has shown are little to none.”

We have shown the ineffectiveness of the COVID vaccines, and particularly the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines. We showed you conclusively about the superiority of natural innate and acquired-adaptive immunity over vaccinal immunity. We have written repeatedly about the dehumanization and indignity of the compulsory virus control policies including where the ZERO-COVID movement and polices were devastating failures. We even tied the COVID lockdowns and facial masks to the mass shootings we are now seeing exploding across the US.

Jeffrey Tucker’s piece on the loss of moral clarity is stunningly brilliant in sensitizing us to what could happen when already vulnerable persons are further isolated and dehumanized and all decision-making ripped from them, as was done to us during the heights of the COVID lockdown lunacy. We even wrote about the corruption of public health agencies such as the World Health Organization and their role in the COVID disasters globally.

Now I challenge the CDC directly and its Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky to do the right thing by publishing new research by Chandra and Høeg (LANCET) that debunks their (CDC’s) recent mask study that is being used as a key study driving mask policy today. They have a unique moment to show some leadership and to understand much better research methods than the pseudoscience the CDC puts out on a routine basis.

(See link for article)



Don’t hold your breath. 

A few points about the flawed but heavily used and cited CDC mask study:

  • Causation can not be concluded from an ecological mask study
  • Children up to age 18 were classified as pediatric
  • The research methods were poor
  • Data was not parsed out by age-bands as 17 & 18 year olds are not the same as 5-10 year olds
  • It was an observational study
  • It was plagued by selection bias
  • It could not control for all the key potential confounding factors
  • There was no mention of statistical adjustment for “vaccine” status or prior infection

The CDC doesn’t update or change anything unless it suits their vested interests.  Every time they up Lyme numbers there’s a new “vaccine” in the works.  Every. Single. Time. It’s getting old.  Rather than focus efforts on early diagnostics and effective treatments, the efforts remain, per usual, on a “magic bullet” cure-all vaccine which historically has only further served to maim patientsThe reason?  “Vaccines” are the cash-cow every researcher hopes to land.  They know that researching tests and effective treatments are not big money-makers, and will certainly not give them the power and prestige they desire in the cut-throat world of competitive research vying for government grants doled out by none other than Dr. Fauci, aka Dr. Evil.

%d bloggers like this: