https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/bad-pfizer-vaccine-batches-accoun

Bad Pfizer Vaccine Batches Account for 4.2% of doses but 71% of Serious Adverse Events

Explains Why Some Have Severe Side Effects and Others Do Not

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

April 13, 2023

I am routinely asked: why are so many people who took the COVID-19 vaccines apparently fine while others are suffering heart damage, strokes, blood clots and are ending up disabled or dead? It has been suspected for many months that there may be variations in vaccine lots or batches that could partially explain these observations. In other words, not everyone is getting the same dose of mRNA.

Under Emergency Use Authorization, the vaccine companies and their subcontractors do not have any inspections of the final filled and finished vials. This is unprecedented for a widely used product of any type. It is possible that lipid nanoparticles aggregate in suspension and so some batches may contain more mRNA than others. Likewise, since lot size has varied over time, it is possible that contaminants from the manufacturing process may be concentrated in some smaller lots compared to larger ones. Finally, there may be product transport, storage, and use factors that denature mRNA including heating, air injected into vials, and multiple needles dipped into the suspension. (See link for article)

______________

SUMMARY:

  • Japan returned millions of doses due to contamination
  • Metallic beads are used by biodefense contractors which may explain the bizarre magnetism at the injection site
  • A report from Schmeling and coworkers inspecting the Pfizer shot found:
    • 71% of serious adverse events came from 4.2% of doses (high risk batches)
    • conversely <1% of these events came from 32.1% of doses (low risk batches)
    • The variation explained for the high and moderate risk batches was 78 and 89%, respectively
    • Thus as more doses were given out of those vials, the greater the number of side effects were reported. This means that the majority of risk is in the shot and not the person who received it
    • This proves the COVID shot debacle is a product problem and not a patient problem
    • This also proves that lack of product inspection has led to untold suffering

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/cdc-confirms-100-of-reported-covid

CDC confirms 100% of reported Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of batches produced & the majority were sent to red Republican States across the USA

Last year this substack reported on “vaccine” lot batch allocations, and how conservative states were being targeted by the eugenics “pandemic” program.

Now we have a more robust and far more damning view of this carefully distributed depopulation scheme.


by The Exposé

On October 31st we exclusively revealed how an investigation of the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) found extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines numerous times, meaning deadly batches of the experimental injections have now been identified.

That investigation also led to the discovery that 130 different lot numbers of Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine distributed to more than 13 states, harmed on average 639 times more people, hospitalised on average 109 times more people, and killed on average 22 times more people than the 4,289 different lt number of Pfizer vaccine distributed to 12 states or less.

However, the most shocking finding of the investigation was that 100% of Covid-19 vaccine deaths reported to VAERS with identified lot numbers had been caused by just 5% of the batches produced. But the deeply troubling findings don’t end there, because we decided to conduct further analysis of the VAERS data on the Covid-19 vaccines, and we’ve discovered that the majority of the deadliest batches were clearly sent to Republican controlled red states across the USA.

(See link for article)

________________

**Comment**

Houston, we have yet another problem…..

If you would rather watch a video on the same topic go here:  CDC Admits Red States Got “Rapid Kill” COVID Vaccine Batches

**Comment**

So thankful someone listened to the entire podcost and broke it down in this handy article.  I try to do this but sometimes get overwhelmed with the length and amount of material, and neglected to break down Dr. McDonald’s latest work.  I regret this as I consider McDonald an expert and a true help for Lyme patients.  Every word that proceeds out of this man’s mouth is informative.  Now we can all enjoy the information he presented in the podcast in the article which follows.  Enjoy!

https://www.lymedisease.org/lyme-links-alzheimers-and-more/

Pioneering researcher discusses Lyme links to Alzheimer’s and more

April 4, 2023

From the Tick Boot Camp Podcast:

In this eye-opening episode, Dr. Alan McDonald unveils his latest findings, revealing the connections between Lyme disease and an array of serious health issues, including Lewy body dementia, liver damage, leukemia, brain cancer, and even suicide.

This compelling conversation underscores the urgency of broadening our understanding of Lyme disease to better support and treat patients.

Dr. McDonald’s research has led to several groundbreaking discoveries, including:

  1. Lyme Disease Triggers Lewy Body Dementia: Dr. McDonald has discovered a link between Lyme disease and Lewy body dementia, a neurodegenerative disorder that affects the brain. His research has shown that Lewy bodies contain Borrelia DNA, the bacteria responsible for Lyme disease, challenging previous assumptions about the nature of Lewy bodies.
  2. Lyme Disease Causes Liver Damage: Dr. McDonald has found that nearly 20% of acute early Lyme patients suffer from liver issues related to the disease. Early treatment of Lyme disease can help prevent liver damage and its detrimental effects on the body’s detoxification process.
  3. Lyme Disease Linked to Leukemia: Dr. McDonald’s research has also identified a connection between Lyme disease and chronic lymphocytic leukemia, opening up possibilities for improved diagnosis and treatment options for patients affected by both conditions.
  4. Lyme Disease Initiated Brain Cancer: The podcast highlights Dr. McDonald’s ongoing research on glioblastomas, a form of brain cancer, and its association with Lyme disease. This research has the potential to lead to new treatment options and a better understanding of the disease’s impact on the brain.
  5. Lyme Disease and Suicide: The podcast also addresses the crucial connection between Lyme disease and suicide, emphasizing the importance of understanding and supporting patients struggling with the psychological impact of Lyme disease.
  6. Lyme Disease Intelligently Evades Tests: Dr. McDonald’s research illustrates the Lyme bacteria’s ability to sequester itself in the body, leading to false-negative test results and leaving many Lyme patients undiagnosed and untreated.

Click here to listen.

It’s also available on Apple podcasts, Google podcast, and Spotify.

______________

**Comment**

As I read this, I was again hit hard with the fact that this seriously incredible information isn’t even on the radar of mainstream research/medicine/public health.  After 40 years we haven’t budged on understanding this complex illness which typically includes far more than just Lyme, which is why many call it MSIDS or multi systemic infectious disease syndrome or Lyme and company.  Lyme alone is formidable, but add in a few coinfections just as nasty and you are one sick dog.  McDonald and a few others are the rare scientists who aren’t led by the government narrative/paradigm and who do not have conflicts of interests that obviously make them biased.  Further, they obviously look harder and don’t quit when they get the accepted result.

Hopefully the last few years have awakened many to the fact science has been hijacked; however, science has always been hijacked in many areas and Lyme/MSIDS is one of them.  I would put vaccines, cancer, autism, MS, chronic fatigue, and many others in this camp as well.  Currently, these diseases are huge money makers and the ‘powers that be’ are raking in royalties and other monies and don’t want their cash cows to stop.  Public health is the last thing on their minds.  If these diseases are in fact triggered or caused by hidden infections, they could be helped by cheap, already existing antimicrobials that could be repurposed.  As we have clearly seen with COVID, those controlling the narrative simply can’t allow this to happen.

For more:

https://www.lymedisease.org/padula-lyme-interferes-with-eyes-brain/

Lyme can interfere with how your eyes and brain work together

April 6, 2023

By William V. Padula, OD SFNAP FAAO FNORA

Tick-borne infections can affect your vision in many ways. There may be blurring, double vision, light sensitivity, visual distortion, difficulty with balance, dizziness, and problems focusing, to name several.

Vision is more than just the image that we see. 70% of all the sensory nerves in the entire body come from the eyes. In fact, the eyes don’t actually see. Rather, they are sophisticated ‘cameras’ through which the brain does the seeing.

The brain has two primary means for organizing visual information. One process (the focal process) is the conscious or attentional process. This part of our vision provides information about detail so that we can see to identify objects. We link our thinking or cognitive process to this portion of vision.

However, there is a second process called the spatial or ambient process. It sets up the ability to use the focal process. The spatial visual process matches information with the balance centers and sends information to the cortex to organize how we see space before we actually see the detail.

The focal process isolates on details. Using the analogy of the forest and the trees, the focal process sees the ‘trees’ and the spatial visual process sees the world as the ‘forest.’ Together the spatial process gives orientation and organization to stabilize the visual process first with proprioception (information from the muscles and joints) establishing a grounding or stability with gravity to engage the spatial visual process first before looking at the detail.

The spatial visual process grounds the visual process and cortex so that the focal process can disassociate to look at a detail without losing orientation to our position sense. When the spatial process becomes unstable, the visual world becomes detail oriented (suddenly the visual world sees only the ’trees’) and this becomes over-whelming, similar to driving in a snowstorm at night with your high beam headlights on.

Maintaining the balance

There is a balance between the two visual processes that must be maintained. This balance provides efficiency, accuracy and the ability to adapt to change in our visual as well as sensorimotor world. (Sensorimotor refers to how we use our senses to interact with our surroundings.)

Lyme-related diseases often produce inflammation, which can disrupt the balance between the two visual processes. Because vision is connected neurologically to respiration and cardio function through the autonomic nervous system, any changes with the visual process will affect the autonomic system.

The imbalance in the visual process produces stress and affects the cardio-rhythms and respiration. A tick-borne infection that becomes neurological will not only directly affect the brain processing associated with visual processing, but may also affect the soft tissue and joints, cardio-respiratory systems, the vestibular system, etc. In turn the neurological imbalance affects both the visual process in the brain directly as well as the indirect relationships with other motor and sensory systems.

Research

One way of evaluating how the eyes and brain work together is called a visual evoked potential (VEP) test. It measures the electrical signal that the brain’s visual cortex generates in response to visual stimulation. Research shows that abnormal results on this test strongly indicate tick-borne disease.

My colleagues and I have also found another potential eye-related biomarker for tick-borne infections—a hazy white ring surrounding the optic nerve. This is called peri-papillary ischemia, and it is highly associated with tick-borne infections. We believe it arises from biofilms that clog the narrow capillary vessels around the optic nerve, blocking blood flow.

In my practice, I have found that changes in the VEP brain waves can be brought back to normal through use of special lenses and various therapeutic techniques. This therapy helps the brain reset how it processes information and resolves many of the patient’s visual challenges. This indicates that VEP abnormalities don’t have to be permanent.

Balance and Movement

The balance difficulties associated with tick-borne disease often come from a mismatch of information between the spatial visual process and other balance centers. This produces a condition know as Visual Midline Shift Syndrome (VMSS).

When there is a mismatch of visual spatial information and information from muscles, joints and the vestibular, the visual midline can become shifted. When this occurs, persons will drift when walking or feel as if they are not as stable. For example, people with this visual spatial imbalance often feel that they are too close to one side of the road when driving. Or they may feel like they are being pulled to one side when walking.

VMSS can be improved by the use of special glasses called “yoked prisms.” These realign the visual midline and re-center the center of mass. Balance can in many cases be improved very quickly when these prisms are prescribed properly.

A Part of the Solution: Rehabilitation of Vision

The following checklist provides a self-assessment for potential symptoms associated with visual processing that may be affected by tick-borne disease.

  • Difficulty converging the eyes to maintain alignment for reading ____
  • Difficulty maintaining focus of the eyes for near vision activities ____
  • Losing place when reading  ____
  • Blurry vision that changes  ____
  • Dizziness ____
  • Difficulty with attention and concentration ____
  • Loss of comprehension when reading  ____
  • Difficulty with visual memory  ____
  • Avoids looking at objects close to the face  ____
  • Difficulty with balance when walking  ____
  • Drifting when walking ____
  • Experiences feeling of being overwhelmed when in busy, crowded environmen____
  • Bumps into objects ____
  • Light and glare sensitive ____

If you are experiencing any of these symptoms, you need a careful assessment of your neuro-visual process. There are some neuro-optometrists who specialize in working with persons with tick-borne infections.

The treatment approach will differ from a standard vision exam. It will include brain wave testing (VEP) and a careful assessment of the neuro-visual-postural organization through instruments to assess weight shift during walking and shift in visual midline/center of mass (COM).

This testing should be accomplished in conjunction with the physician treating the tick-borne infection and not in place of it. Services from psychologists for counseling and/or neuropsychological testing may also be important. Persons with tick-borne infections will need an inter-professional approach for treatment. When the visual process becomes compromised, the problem often continues even after the tick-borne infection has been treated and resolved.

Dr. William Padula is the founder of the Padula Institute of Vision Rehabilitation, in Guilford, Connecticut. More information at his website: padulainstitute.com

________________

**Comment**

Advances like this are always encouraging; however, it’s important to remember that oftentimes proper treatment will ameliorate symptoms entirely or will at least improve them vastly.  That said, we need all the tools in our toolbox we can get!

For more:

And again, these things are not rare.  They are rarely reported.  Big Diff!

https://www.jpands.org/vol28no1/ophir.pdf

The Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters against Severe Illness and Deaths: Scientific Fact or Wishful Myth?

Yaakov Ophir, Ph.D. Yaffa Shir-Raz, Ph.D. Shay Zakov, Ph.D. Peter A. McCullough, M.D., M.P.H.

ABSTRACT

The medical narrative justifying the global vaccination campaign has changed throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis. While the primary narrative focused on the proclaimed excellent ability of the novel mRNA vaccines to prevent infections and (therefore) to attenuate the spread of the pandemic, policymakers today (March 2023) acknowledge the poor vaccine efficacy (VE) of contemporary booster doses against infections but insist that the boosters are still capable of providing long-term protection against severe illness and deaths (as if the two types of protection do not depend on each other). We examine the evidence behind this modified narrative through an in-depth evaluation of representative and high-profile data from: (1) the formal, phase 3 clinical trials by Pfizer and Moderna, which preceded the FDA’s emergency use authorization (EUA); (2) the observational studies from Israel (“the world’s lab,” as termed by Pfizer officials), which examined the efficacy of the fourth dose at about the time the FDA authorized this second booster; and (3) the publicly available, real-life dashboards of pandemic statistics.

This investigation encountered multiple methodological and representational constraints, including short, and sometimes arbitrary or uneven follow-up periods; uneven exclusion criteria and COVID-19 testing levels; selection biases; and selective report of results. But most importantly, the documented, conditional probability of death and severe illness (i.e., the percentage of severe illness and death cases among those infected with the virus) did not differ between the treatment and the control groups of the various clinical and observational efficacy studies. Altogether, the representative data examined in this article do not lend convincing support to the notion that the current booster doses offer protection against severe illness and deaths that extends significantly beyond their temporary and fragile protection against infections. Considering the already known poor efficacy against infections and transmission and the ever-growing concerns over serious, vaccine-associated adverse outcomes, the findings of this meticulous scientific investigation challenge the current (modified) narrative and serve as an urgent call for the medical community to reconsider the balance between the benefits and the risks of the newly developed COVID-19 vaccines. (See link for entire study)

_________________

**Comment**

Efficacy has been dealt with by experts many, many times over; however, the bought out media is simply not reporting on the way ‘the powers that be’ have manipulated, skewed, hidden, and outright lied about data.  It’s also important to remember that similarly to Lyme/MSIDS, the entire house of cards is built on false premises including:

  • they have never, to this day, created a successful”vaccine” for an upper respiratory disease
  • a “vaccine” isn’t needed for an illness which has a 99.991% recovery rate by doing nothing
  • the entire house of cards is based upon flawed testing making everything COVID when it could simply be the flu
  • this article points out that these injections lack a viable mechanism of action against COVID in the airways and that antibodies cannot prevent injection due to the fact COVID invades through the respiratory tract and that none of the “vaccine” trials gave any evidence that they prevent transmission.  Urging people to get these fast-tracked gene therapy injections to “protect others” has NO basis in fact
  • Despite forcing countries to put up sovereign assets including their bank reserves, military bases, and embassy buildings as collateral, these “vaccine” manufacturers ADMIT efficacy and risks are UNKNOWN
  • when absolute risk is taken into account, these injections are less than 1% effective
  • COVID “vaccine” manufacturers have unblinded their trials giving control groups the actual “vaccine,” making long-term efficacy and safety impossible to assess
  • Every clinical study and non-peer reviewed press release regarding efficacy needs to be revisited due to the sleight-of-statistical hand and the faulty PCR used in these studies.  Please remember that the CDC did not consider people “vaccinated” until up to five weeks after the initial dose – demonstrating brazen statistical manipulation to bury perception of adverse events and deaths
  • CDC data has shown that mass “vaccination” has had NO measurable impact on COVID mortality.
  • Thanks to a federal court order, the FDA has confirmed graphene is in the COVID shots. Spanish researchers have found that graphene makes up more than 99% of the injection
  • German researchers have found each and every vial to be contaminated with toxic ingredients
  • The COVID gene therapy injections have caused more reports of adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS

For more:

https://theprint.in/world/british-indian-medic-backs-legal-review-of-covid-vaccine-in-south-africa-high-court

British Indian medic backs legal review of COVID vaccine in South Africa High Court

 

London, Mar 29 (PTI) Leading UK-based Indian-origin consultant cardiologist Aseem Malhotra is among a group of international experts backing an approach to the High Court of South Africa, calling for an urgent judicial review of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine products which he fears may be “harmful”.

Lawyers representing the human rights group Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA) say the show cause notice was filed on Monday at the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria, along with real-world data analysis, which is claimed to show an association with increasing death from both COVID and non-COVID causes in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.

FASA has approached the court to review and set aside the authorization of Pfizer’s vaccine products on the basis that the authorization was “unlawful”.

If successful, this could result in the removal of COVID mRNA vaccines from the South African market and also have global implications.

(See link for article)

Here’s Malhotra’s tweet on the statement.

______________

SUMMARY:

  • Malhotra states that the literature and the trial data shows unequivocally that for the majority of people, the Pfizer shot is more harmful than beneficial and should never have even been approved.
  • Malhotra states the injections should be halted pending a full investigation.
  • Dr Herman Edeling, neurosurgeon with over 40 years of experience, notes that the mRNA “vaccine” administered as Comirnaty in South Africa should “never have been branded as ‘safe’ and ‘effective’”.
  • The application calls on Pfizer to explain their conduct and calls on regulators and government to hold Pfizer accountable.
  • FASA hopes to announce a date of hearing soon.
  • Pfizer is predictably silent.

________________

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/hundreds-of-french-citizens-suffer

Hundreds of French Citizens Suffer Cardiac Events after Bivalent Boosters

30 Day Regulatory Window Captures Heart Attacks, Strokes, and Blood Clots

I have served on or chaired two dozen data safety monitoring boards for randomized trials of novel experimental drugs or devices. I can tell you first hand that for COVID-19 vaccines, a 30 day regulatory window after injection is fair game for attribution of health events to the product when the adverse events of interest are known to be caused by the mRNA induced Wuhan Spike protein.

Jabagi et al, NEJM, reported from the French National Health Data System linked to the national COVID-19 vaccination database disclosing cardiovascular events after mRNA BA4/BA5 bivalent boosters. All persons who were 50 years of age or older and who had received a booster dose between October 6 and November 9, 2022, were included in the study. The composite of ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary occurred in 335 unfortunate individuals. The authors make the mistake of dividing by the cases by the entire number vaccinated and comparing rates to monovalent boosters. Neither of these operations are valid since there is incomplete capture of events and comparison was not made to a placebo or control group.

(See link for article)

Both Malhotra and McCullough are cardiologists. It would behoove us to listen closely.

Despite these frightening developments (among many others) the Biden Admin just announced a $5 Billion public-private partnership on Next Gen COVID “vaccines,” even though Biden just signed a bill formally ending the COVID emergency.

http://  Approx. 8 Min

$5Billion Big Pharma Partnership

I’m sure they’ll get it right this time…..

For more: