https://plandemicseries.com/ 8 Min. Trailer here as well as other video shorts derived from Plandemic & the full documentary if you haven’t seen it yet. (Highly recommend)
As the only independent movie to reach over one billion views, Plandemic1 is accredited for being first to warn the world of the crimes against humanity that are now out in the open.
Plandemic2 set a world record with 2 million unique viewers tuning into the global premier.
Plandemic3 is currently in production, slated for release summer of 2022.
The focus of Plandemic3 is to stop the indoctrination and trafficking of our children and end the tyranny that’s threatening our freedoms and future.
We’re currently raising funds for the production and marketing cost of Plandemic 3. All donations are tax deductible.
Dr. Bruchet is the doctor who spoke at a rally at Lions Gate Hospital that exposed the stillborn deaths in babies whose mothers had received the COVID shots. It appears the ‘powers that be’ want him quiet.
Heroic Dr Mel Bruchet MD, 80 years old, handcuffed, drugged, and imprisoned for warning us.
Dr Mark Trozzi
January 10, 2022
Introduction
This video may be seen in 3 parts. The first hour was held with Dr Nagase alone during the time that Dr Bruchet was initially missing, drugged and locked up. Dr Nagase relates the events of Br Bruchet’s abduction by police and his abuse within the covid-agenda dominated BC health “care” system. In the second half of the first hour, Dr Nagase shares the story of a 43 year old father of three, whose in hospital covid “treatment”, best described as criminal assault, ended with his death. The second hour of the video is an interview with Dr Bruchet also present. This was held after he had endured the weeks of abuse and incarceration spanning Christmas and New Years. See what you think: is Dr Bruchet crazy and demented, or intelligent and wise? (See link for article)
_________________
**Comment**
The AMA, APHA, and ASHP also are threatening doctors who dare defy the accepted narrative.
Forget the “novel virus.” The quest for “novel” COVID drugs and the profits they bring have been the real problem all along. So said Dr. Pierre Kory, the Wisconsin intensive care physician and lung specialist who reportedly treated hundreds of congressmen for coronavirus with a medication that’s apparently not good enough (or too good?) for the rest of us: ivermectin.
Kory made his comments this past weekend on Maria Bartiromo’s show Sunday Morning Futures, on which he appeared with Senator Ron Johnson (R-Wis.). After he remarked on how a medical establishment corrupted by money has denied Americans simple, inexpensive, life-saving medical care, host Bartiromo exclaimed, “That is disgusting! I know for a fact that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin work to treat COVID!”
To this, Kory nodded in obvious agreement. (See link for article & videos)
Internist Dr. Syed Haider has treated more than 4,000 COVID-19-positive patients so far with only five needing to be hospitalized, none of which have died.
In a video Dr. Haider states he’s used many off-label meds successfully for COVID including:
a 1% hydrogen peroxide nasal & oral rinse (reduces viral load) Go Here for a nebulized solution of food-grade hydrogen peroxide and Dr. Levy’s treatment: RapidVirusRecovery
Please also see the other video (Approx. 10 Min) from the top link where WI Senator Johnson, Dr. Carson, and Dr. Kory discuss COVID treatments.
Dr. Kory reveals OZ behind the curtain:a broken system that ignores cheap, generic, safe drugs with dozens of studies backing them, but only embraces expensive, novel, unsafe treatments that don’t work.
FLCCC, the international group Dr. Kory is a part of, is inundated with requests from sick people who are in despair because they can not access to these medicines as most doctors won’t prescribe and pharmacies won’t fill them because health agencies, acting in lock-step with Big Pharma, are sending threatening letters scaring doctors and pharmacists. Dr. Kory states, “It’s a war out here.”
This Thursday Dr Klinghardt will be talking about post vaccine syndrome and long covid: the symptoms and his suggested options to help overcome it.
We know that this is going to be a very popular Debrief and we have a maximum of 1,000 places so please make sure you log into the call early to reserve your spot!
We apologise in advance if you’re unable to join, there will be a very limited time 48 hour replay.
8.30pm UK 9.30pm Central Europe 12.30PM Pacific 3.30pm Eastern
By registering for this webinar you understand that the information contained within it is the copyright of Dr Klinghardt and that NO recordings may be made. If you do not agree to this then please do not register.
Just today, ICAN previously reported that Dr. Barney Graham, Deputy Director of the Vaccine Research Center at Fauci’s agency – the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) within the NIH – stands to earn millions from sales of the Moderna vaccine, demonstrating a clear conflict of interest between his personal financial interest, and his role in developing safe and effective vaccines. When ICAN got Graham’s emails, many with Moderna’s CEO were redacted, as well as emails with Ralph Baric, a professor at UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health with ties to the Wuhan Institute of Virology.
Even as Sen. Rand Paul calls Fauci out for spending his $480,000 per year income to call Harvard and Yale epidemiologists “fringe”
The GOP Oversight Committee has released a letter – and emails – asking tough questions about Fauci’s involvement in an alleged cover-up of evidence in support of a lab-leak origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
Specifically, the letter states that he worked with Peter Daszak to side-step policies restricting gain-of-function research. Note they are not saying he “allegedly” did this.
“Despite Dr. Fauci claiming otherwise on multiple occasions, he was, in fact, aware of the monetary relationship between NIAID, the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH), EcoHealth Alliance Inc. (EcoHealth), and the WIV by January 27, 2020. Dr. Fauci also knew that NIAID worked with EcoHealth to craft a grant policy to sidestep the gain-of-function moratorium at the time. This new policy, designed by EcoHealth and agreed to by NIAID, allowed EcoHealth to complete dangerous experiments on novel bat coronaviruses—with very little oversight—that would have otherwise been blocked by the moratorium. In January 2020, Dr. Fauci was also aware that EcoHealth was not in compliance with the terms of its grant that funded the WIV.4 EcoHealth was required to submit an annual progress report to NIAID by September 30, 2019, and had not yet done so.”
The letter also informs Becerra that they will be interviewing Fauci over this issue and over the issue of his secret phone call with 11 scientists – none of whom work for the US Government – to spin the evidence that showed that the mutational differences between SARS-CoV-2 and other betacoronaviruses were not consistent with evolutionary processes.
They want to know if Fauci or Collins personally edited the cover-up piece, published in Nature Medicine. If they did, they are guilty of conspiring to mislead other government officials. (See link for article as well as letter to Becerra)
Military Documents About Gain of Function Contradict Fauci Testimony Under Oath
Military documents state that EcoHealth Alliance approached DARPA in March 2018 seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the gain of function research moratorium.
The main report regarding the EcoHealth Alliance proposal leaked on the internet a couple of months ago, it has remained unverified until now. Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense, written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
“The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said, “It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were buried.
[WASHINGTON, D.C. – Jan. 10, 2022] Project Veritas has obtained startling never-before-seen documents regarding the origins of COVID-19, gain of function research, vaccines, potential treatments which have been suppressed, and the government’s effort to conceal all of this.
The documents in question stem from a report at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, better known as DARPA, which were hidden in a top secret shared drive.
DARPA is an agency under the U.S. Department of Defense in charge of facilitating research in technology with potential military applications.
Project Veritas has obtained a separate report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense written by U.S. Marine Corp Major, Joseph Murphy, a former DARPA Fellow.
The report states that EcoHealthAlliance approached DARPA in March 2018, seeking funding to conduct gain of function research of bat borne coronaviruses. The proposal, named Project Defuse, was rejected by DARPA over safety concerns and the notion that it violates the basis gain of function research moratorium.
According to the documents, NIAID, under the direction of Dr. Fauci, went ahead with the research in Wuhan, China and at several sites across the U.S.
Dr. Fauci has repeatedly maintained, under oath, that the NIH and NAIAD have not been involved in gain of function research with the EcoHealth Alliance program. But according to the documents obtained by Project Veritas which outline why EcoHealth Alliance’s proposal was rejected, DARPA certainly classified the research as gain of function.
“The proposal does not mention or assess potential risks of Gain of Function (GoF) research,” a direct quote from the DARPA rejection letter.
Major Murphy’s report goes on to detail great concern over the COVID-19 gain of function program, the concealment of documents, the suppression of potential curatives, like Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine, and the mRNA vaccines.
Project Veritas reached out to DARPA for comment regarding the hidden documents and spoke with the Chief of Communications, Jared Adams, who said,
“It doesn’t sound normal to me,” when asked about the way the documents were shrouded in secrecy. “If something resides in a classified setting, then it should be appropriately marked,” Adams said. “I’m not at all familiar with unmarked documents that reside in a classified space, no.”
In a video breaking this story published on Monday night, Project Veritas CEO, James O’Keefe, asked a foundational question to DARPA:
“Who at DARPA made the decision to bury the original report? They could have raised red flags to the Pentagon, the White House, or Congress, which may have prevented this entire pandemic that has led to the deaths of 5.4 million people worldwide and caused much pain and suffering to many millions more.”
Dr. Anthony Fauci has not yet responded to a request for comment on this story.
James O’Keefe established Project Veritas in 2010 as a non-profit journalism enterprise to continue his undercover reporting work. Today, Project Veritas investigates and exposes corruption, dishonesty, self-dealing, waste, fraud, and other misconduct in both public and private institutions to achieve a more ethical and transparent society and to engage in litigation to: protect, defend and expand human and civil rights secured by law, specifically First Amendment rights including promoting the free exchange of ideas in a digital world; combat and defeat censorship of any ideology; promote truthful reporting; and defend freedom of speech and association issues including the right to anonymity. O’Keefe serves as the CEO and Chairman of the Board so that he can continue to lead and teach his fellow journalists, as well as protect and nurture the Project Veritas culture.
Project Veritas is a registered 501(c)3 organization. Project Veritas does not advocate specific resolutions to the issues raised through its investigations.
Justices are hearing arguments on vaccine mandates. It could go either way, with smart money against Biden. But watch Roberts, he’s gone south on important health issues before.
FNC: “The U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments Friday in a high-stakes public session to decide whether the U.S. government can begin enforcing sweeping COVID 19 vaccine requirements affecting nearly 100 million workers.
For three hours and 40 minutes, the justices heard oral arguments over federal vaccine and testing rules for businesses with 100 employees or more, and on vaccine mandates for health care workers at facilities receiving Medicaid and Medicare funding. (See link for article)
________________
**Comment**
Unfortunately, the author of the article didn’t utilize facts & data that are now available:
Nobody has a clue what’s in these injections and this should alarm everyone.
Independent researchers are finding frightening objects in the blood of the “vaxxed”.
These injections have caused more adverse reactions & death than any other vaccine in VAERS history.
An American Heart Association study shows a link between the shots and heart attacks and the data has been confirmed by others.
Even the CDC admits the shots are causing heart disease.
A large Israeli study shows the Pfizer shot increases myocarditis three-fold.
None of these injections stop transmission or infection so the argument that lives are being lost daily due to dropping the “vaccine” mandate is completely false.
Although there are obvious holes in ‘breakthrough’ case reporting, data on the “vaccinated” shows many things:
because the CDC is purposely misleading the public on what “fully vaccinated” actually means, there is absolutely no way to know safety and efficacy, and they continue to move the goal-posts.
since manufacturers do not take “absolute risk reduction” into account, efficacy is less than 1%.
all the COVID shots show waning efficacy.
the “vaccinated” are the ones driving viral immune escape causing the pandemic to linger.
The following data completely dismantles the narrativethat these fast-tracked, experimental, unproven injections which aren’t vaccines, do not stop infection or transmission, have a boat-load of contaminants, and have caused more sickness and death than any vaccine in the history of VAERS, reduce hospitalization & death. That is a lie.
The following independent analysis has been ignored by the CDC, the FDA and the NIH since October of 2021.
Worldwide Bayesian Causal Impact Analysis of Vaccine Administration on Deaths and Cases Associated with COVID-19: A BigData Analysis of 145 Countries
2021-11-15
Abstract
Policy makers and mainstream news anchors have promised the public that the COVID-19 vaccine rollout worldwide would reduce symptoms, and thereby cases and deaths associated with COVID-19. While this vaccine rollout is still in progress, there is a large amount of public data available that permits an analysis of the effect of the vaccine rollout on COVID-19 related cases and deaths. Has this public policy treatment produced the desired effect?
One manner to respond to this question can begin by implementing a Bayesian causal analysis comparing both pre- and post-treatment periods. This study analyzed publicly available COVID-19 data from OWID (Hannah Ritchie and Roser 2020Hannah Ritchie, Lucas Rodés-Guirao, Edouard Mathieu, and Max Roser. 2020. “Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19).” Our World in Data.) utlizing the R package CausalImpact(Brodersen et al. 2015Brodersen, Kay H., Fabian Gallusser, Jim Koehler, Nicolas Remy, and Steven L. Scott. 2015. “Inferring Causal Impact Using Bayesian Structural Time-Series Models.” Annals of Applied Statistics 9: 247–74. https://doi.org/10.1214/14-aoas788.) to determine the causal effect of the administration of vaccines on two dependent variables that have been measured cumulatively throughout the pandemic: total deaths per million (y1) and total cases per million (y2). After eliminating all results from countries with p > 0.05, there were 128 countries for y1 and 103 countries for y2 to analyze in this fashion, comprising 145 unique countries in total (avg. p < 0.004).
Results indicate that the treatment (vaccine administration) has a strong and statistically significant propensity to causally increase the values in either y1 or y2 over and above what would have been expected with no treatment. y1 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+115/-13), which means
89.84% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total deaths per million associated with COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment (vaccine) initiation.
y2 showed an increase/decrease ratio of (+105/-16) which means
86.78% of statistically significant countries showed an increase in total cases per million of COVID-19 due directly to the causal impact of treatment (vaccine) initiation.
Causal impacts of the treatment on y1 ranges from -19% to +19015% with an average causal impact of +463.13%. Causal impacts of the treatment on y2 ranges from -46% to +12240% with an average causal impact of +260.88%. Hypothesis 1 Null can be rejected for a large majority of countries.
This study subsequently performed correlational analyses on the causal impact results, whose effect variables can be represented as y1.E and y2.E respectively, with the independent numeric variables of: days elapsed since vaccine rollout began (n1), total vaccination doses per hundred (n2), total vaccine brands/types in use (n3) and the independent categorical variables continent (c1), country (c2), vaccine variety (c3). All categorical variables showed statistically significant (avg. p: < 0.001) postive Wilcoxon signed rank values (y1.EV:[c1 3.04; c2: 8.35; c3: 7.22] and y2.EV:[c1 3.04; c2: 8.33; c3: 7.19]). This demonstrates that the distribution of y1.E and y2.E was non-uniform among categories. The Spearman correlation between n2 and y2.E was the only numerical variable that showed statistically significant results (y2.E ~ n2: ρ: 0.34 CI95%[0.14, 0.51], p: 4.91e-04). This low positive correlation signifies that countries with higher vaccination rates do not have lower values for y2.E, slightly the opposite in fact. Still, the specifics of the reasons behind these differences between countries, continents, and vaccine types is inconclusive and should be studied further as more data become available. Hypothesis 2 Null can be rejected for c1, c2, c3 and n2 and cannot be rejected for n1, and n3.
The statistically significant and overwhelmingly positive causal impact after vaccine deployment on the dependent variables total deaths and total cases per million should be highly worrisome for policy makers.
They indicate a marked increase in both COVID-19 related cases and death due directly to a vaccine deployment that was originally sold to the public as the “key to gain back our freedoms.” The effect of vaccines on total cases per million and its low positive association with total vaccinations per hundred signifies a limited impact of vaccines on lowering COVID-19 associated cases. These results should encourage local policy makers to make policy decisions based on data, not narrative, and based on local conditions, not global or national mandates.
These results should also encourage policy makers to begin looking for other avenues out of the pandemic aside from mass vaccination campaigns.
Some variables that could be included in future analyses might include vaccine lot by country, the degree of prevalence of previous antibodies against SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 in the population before vaccine administration begins, and the Causal Impact of ivermectin on the same variables used in this study.
“Untruth naturally afflicts historical information. There are various reasons that make this unavoidable. One of them is partisanship for opinions and schools. If the soul is impartial in receiving information, it devotes to that information the share of critical investigation the information deserves, and its truth or untruth thus becomes clear. However, if the soul is infected with partisanship for a particular opinion or sect, it accepts without a moment’s hesitation the information that is agreeable to it. Prejudice and partisanship obscure the critical faculty and preclude critical investigation. The result is that falsehoods are accepted and transmitted” — Ibn Khaldun, 1379 A.D.
