Archive for the ‘Activism’ Category

AMA President Opposing Free Speech As COVID ‘House of Cards Collapsing’

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/ama-president-opposes-free-speech?

AMA President Opposes Free Speech

Dr. Jesse M. Ehrenfeld believes vaccine orthodoxy must be preserved at all costs

Dr. Jesse Ehrenfeld was inaugurated president of the American Medical Association in 2023. He and his colleague—Dr. Benjamin Hoffman, an Oregon-based pediatrician—just wrote a very foolish editorial in MEDPAGE TODAY titled: Medical Misinfo Runs Rampant Online. The Gov’t Must Retain the Right to Intervene.—Combating vaccine falsehoods and other inaccurate claims protects public health

According to Dr. Ehrenfeld’s bio that is posted on the AMA website, he has a distinguished career in anesthesiology. His bio also states:

Upon his inauguration, Dr. Ehrenfeld made AMA history as the first openly gay president of the organization. For the past two decades, he has been a nationally recognized advocate for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ+) individuals. In 2018, in recognition of his outstanding research contributions, he received the inaugural Sexual and Gender Minority Research Investigator Award from the director of the NIH.

I’m immediately struck by the combination of anesthesiologist and gay rights activist, as both endeavors have been matters of great controversy since the mid 19th century.

Imagine if—following Friedrich Sertürner’s discovery of morphine in 1805—medical boards in the United States (affiliated with the British East India Company) insisted that ONLY opioid-based analgesics could be used, and that no one could use ether to anesthetize patients. To understand just how much disagreement, discussion, and debate there was around the use of ether, take a look at this history of the Ether Controversy.

Imagine if a medical board in Boston established a censorship apparatus to prevent anyone from challenging the supremacy of morphine as an analgesic, so that William Morton, Crawford Long, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr. couldn’t publish about the value of ether for surgical anesthesiology.

Fast forward to the end of the 20th century. Imagine if no one was allowed to publish any criticism of the promotion and marketing of OxyContin by Purdue Pharma.  (See link for article)

The AMA is entirely corrupt, instructs doctors to deceive, and has caused untold thousands of deaths due to their banning of early treatments for COVID.

_____________

https://expose-news.com/2024/03/27/dr-fullmich-statement-from-prison-their-house-of-cards-is-collapsing/

Dr. Füllmich Statement From Prison – ‘Their House of Cards is Collapsing’

Dr. Reiner Füllmich has continued to analyze evidence of the crimes against humanity from prison. that he and the Corona Committee had been working to expose since 2020. The corruption is being increasingly seen worldwide and “Their house of cards is collapsing” according to Reiner, “and we as international attorneys will do our best to speed up that process and make sure that Justice is done.” He adds ‘The windows of truth that are opening worldwide and the light that shines through these windows is in the process of identifying all of those who are responsible, no one will escape Justice.

Reiner Füllmich made this statement in a a break from the his trial due to the Easter holidays which has followed eight days in court. He has now been able to summarize the criminal proceedings against him and concludes that Hoffman and Antonia Fischer were only interested in ‘getting their hands on the Corona Committees donation. He claims that ‘through ‘fraud and extortion’, they had gotten their hands on roughly 1.5 million euros of his and his client’s money.’

Viviane Fischer, however, has confirmed in court that they both took loans in order to secure the Corona Committee’s donations which were at risk from “government attack, but they were both able to pay the monies back.

What this means is accusations that Reiner had embezzled committee funds are unfounded. In fact, there seems to be no reason for the man to have been kept in jail at all, and he believes, as many others do, that the criminal proceedings are an effort to shut him up and put him in jail and can see that the ‘DA’s case, is dead in the water.’

Reiner therefore, seems to be more positive for the future, which can be heard in his statement which you can listen to in full in the video of the audio below. However, I have also transcribed the audio recording verbatim and have added it underneath the video for those unable to play videos. (See link for article and 10 Min video)

For more:

Climate: The Movie

http://

The Cold Truth

3/22/24

This film exposes the climate alarm as an invented scare without any basis in science. It shows that mainstream studies and official data do not support the claim that we are witnessing an increase in extreme weather events – hurricanes, droughts, heatwaves, wildfires and all the rest. It emphatically counters the claim that current temperatures and levels of atmospheric CO2 are unusually and worryingly high. On the contrary, compared to the last half billion years of earth’s history, both current temperatures and CO2 levels are extremely and unusually low. We are currently in an ice age. It also shows that there is no evidence that changing levels of CO2 (it has changed many times) has ever ‘driven’ climate change in the past.

Why then, are we told, again and again, that ‘catastrophic man-made climate-change’ is an irrefutable fact? Why are we told that there is no evidence that contradicts it? Why are we told that anyone who questions ‘climate chaos’ is a ‘flat-earther’ and a ‘science-denier’?

The film explores the nature of the consensus behind climate change. It describes the origins of the climate funding bandwagon, and the rise of the trillion-dollar climate industry. It describes the hundreds of thousands of jobs that depend on the climate crisis. It explains the enormous pressure on scientists and others not to question the climate alarm: the withdrawal of funds, rejection by science journals, social ostracism.

But the climate alarm is much more than a funding and jobs bandwagon. The film explores the politics of climate. From the beginning, the climate scare was political. The culprit was free-market industrial capitalism. The solution was higher taxes and more regulation. From the start, the climate alarm appealed to, and has been adopted and promoted by, those groups who favor bigger government.

This is the unspoken political divide behind the climate alarm. The climate scare appeals especially to all those in the sprawling publicly-funded establishment. This includes the largely publicly-funded Western intelligentsia, for whom climate has become a moral cause. In these circles, to criticize or question the climate alarm has become is a breach of social etiquette.

The film includes interviews with a number of very prominent scientists, including Professor Steven Koonin (author of ‘Unsettled’, a former provost and vice-president of Caltech), Professor Dick Lindzen (formerly professor of meteorology at Harvard and MIT), Professor Will Happer (professor of physics at Princeton), Dr John Clauser (winner of the Nobel prize in Physics in 2022), Professor Nir Shaviv (Racah Institute of Physics), professor Ross McKitrick (University of Guelph), Willie Soon and several others.

The film was written and directed by the British filmmaker Martin Durkin and is the sequel of his excellent 2007 documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle. Tom Nelson, a podcaster who has been deeply examining climate debate issues for the better part of two decades, was the producer of the film.

#ClimateTheMovie will be available for free at many online locations starting on March 21 2024. Subtitles for numerous languages are currently being created by the Clintel Foundation. Follow @ClimateTheMovie and @ClintelOrg for updates.

______________

**Comment**

The climate is continually being blamed for tick expansion and Lyme disease proliferation despite independent research refuting this. Shoddy, biased research is pushing an accepted narrative, and media is using corrupt data as the next ‘pandemic-like’ story that they will beat to absolute death.

More data is exposing the narrative, and more and more researchers are finally speaking out against this government & globalist agenda which is big, big business.

80% of carbon offset schemes are ‘likely junk or worthless,’ and green energy policies have made the climate worse.  ‘Science tribalism’ is the norm to obtain highly sought after government grants for research, and science has little to do with it.

What is never revealed, discussed, or debated is the toxic geoengineering going on over our heads which includes spraying polymers into the air – including spider silk filaments containing quantum dot structures, as well as aluminum nanoparticles, and 3D graphene oxide nanoparticles – for ‘weather modification’ and ‘solar geoengineering.’

All of which has been linked with chronic disease.

Another topic never openly discussed is the announced UN plan to clear the lands of people and move them into 15 minute ‘Smart’ Cities.  WiFi, 3D, 5G, and AI makes it all possible.  It can also create a real-time living map that can identify, track, move and control people, and be edited for nefarious purposes.

The ‘climate change’ narrative is also required for globalist desired ’15 minute cities’ who want electric cars that can be controlled and shut down by a ‘smart’ geogrid. The government is using all sorts of incentives/bribes and lies (just like with the emergency use, experimental gene therapy COVID shots developed by the U.S. Military) to get people to buy these worthless machines that can only go 82 miles without being charged, which BTW is done via electricity which is powered by fossil fuels to begin with! The California Governor has banned sales of new gas-powered vehicles, but experts admit moving to electric won’t effect carbon emissions or oil use, even if everyone on the planet bought electric.

  • Airplanes, buses, big trucks, and the mining equipment to get the copper which is used to build electric cars all are oil fired
  • The electric vehicle emits 10-20 tons of carbon dioxide before you even drive it, through the initial mining process and shipping alone.
  • EV Car batteries – which leak and don’t hold power well, “are really not designed to be recycled,” and have toxic ingredients including heavy metals. We can’t even recycle trash!
  • It would take 100 trillion dollars and 400 years and to manufacture enough batteries to store enough power for what Europe will need just this winter.
  • The electric grid is already taxed. Having everyone using electric cars on top of this is insanity, which means cities will ration power.
  • Energy systems are now designed by bureaucrats instead of by engineers, just like science and medicine was hijacked by bureaucrats during COVID.
  • An electric car uses 50 times more electricity when it is charging than a refrigerator when its running.
It takes 500,000 pounds of minerals and rock to make ONE battery.

Mining of course is done in other countries due to strict government regulation in the U.S., but it takes an environmental toll on these poor countries that also use forced and child labor nobody talks about.  

Lastly, also under the guise of ‘climate change,’ equity, and sustainability, infrastructure for rural regions is required to destroy and replace standard farming and real food with wireless farming or ‘precision agriculture,’ and genetically modified Frankinfood which critics describe as just one more toxic scam within the egregious global rollout of 5G and to monitor, control, and irradiate all that lives and breathes.  The FDA, already in damage control mode, has relabelled “GMO” to the more palatable term “bioengineered,” but don’t be fooled – CRISPR plants are GMO’s and should be clearly identified to consumers and subjected to rigorous testing standards; however, our regulatory agencies unfortunately are captured.

For more:

ACTION ALERT: Anti-Supplement Bill Back From the Dead

https://anh-usa.org/durbin-strikes-back/

Durbin Strikes Back

Durbin Strikes Back

After we defeated his anti-supplement bill in 2022, Senator Dick Durbin (D-IL) is trying to do the same thing again. Let’s make sure he doesn’t succeed. Action Alert!


THE TOPLINE

  • Sen. Durbin is planning to reintroduce his legislation to require mandatory product listing for dietary supplements.
  • This is an unnecessary regulation that will restrict consumer choices, putting us on a road to high-dose supplement restrictions with no basis in safety or public health.
  • It is another instance in which the FDA shows its loyalty to drug companies by slapping needless red tape on its competitors in the natural product industry.

It’s time, once again, to defend our supplement access in the face of an FDA / Big Pharma / Sen. Durbin onslaught. We’ve done it before, and we can do it again—but not without a powerful grassroots response telling Congress NOT to restrict our supplements.

MPL on the move

Earlier this week, Sen. Durbin, a longtime supplement opponent,  reportedly sent letters to several supplement industry trade groups indicating he would be reintroducing his Dietary Supplement Listing Act requiring mandatory product listing (MPL) for supplements. This comes on the heels of the FDA asking for the authority to require MPL in its list of legislative proposals for Fiscal Year 2025, as it did the previous year. With your help and support, we defeated Sen. Durbin’s legislation in 2022, and we can do so again.  But, like last time, we need your help.

MPL seeks to create a registry of all supplements on the market bringing it ever closer to the Canadian model that our colleagues at the Natural Health Products Protection Association have confirmed are wiping more and more products from Canadian retail shelves. Sen. Durbin and the FDA claim this policy would help regulators “know when new products are introduced and quickly identify dangerous or illegal products on the market.” We believe Sen. Durbin and the FDA are using safety as a smokescreen and that such a registry will be used to target and eliminate products that the agency believes do not comply with its ridiculous regulations. Just like in Canada.

Supplements: a health threat despite ZERO deaths?

For starters, this is a solution in search of a problem. The safety record for supplements is indisputable. Dietary supplements boast a consistent and remarkable safety profile making them many times more safe than conventional foods. Data from the American Association of Poison Control Center’s National Poison Data System (NPDS) typically show, year on year, that zero Americans die from taking dietary supplements.

Oft-cited reports on supplements causing adverse events fail to highlight that many cases are the result of unsupervised children swallowing pills, elderly Americans choking, and heart palpitations from ingesting too many diet pills, sexual enhancement pills, and energy drinks. Compare these numbers to the adverse events caused by pharmaceutical drugs, or even rates of food borne illness, and you’ll find that supplements are, overall, among the safest things you can consume.

The bottom line is that the supplement industry is not sickening and killing alarming rates of Americans to necessitate restrictive policies. So what’s the real motivation?

As we’ve argued through the years, the FDA takes an antagonistic attitude towards natural products because it relies on the drug industry for funding, and natural products compete with drugs. Put simply, the FDA is captured by drug industry interests. We believe this helps explain the motivation behind many anti-supplement policies, including the ridiculous limits the FDA imposes on what can be said about the benefits of supplements.

The case against MPL

The implications of MPL are even more concerning. MPL might be used to create a list of supplements that might lead to “adverse events,” similar to a legislative effort by Sen. Durbin we defeated a number of years ago. In that case, the list would be created by the FDA and the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM)—the same body that once said people up to the age of 70 don’t need more than 600 IU of vitamin D per day, and above 4,000 IU may be dangerous. Through this and other mechanisms, such as harmonization with EU supplement levels we’ve discussed elsewhere, we can easily see how MPL could be used to eliminate access to high-dose supplements.

To make a long story short, mandatory listing legislation would add regulations to supplements that would increase prices for consumers and decrease available options, making it easy for the FDA to eliminate supplements that compete with the drugs that provide significant funding for the Agency. MPL would also throttle innovation in the supplement sector that delivers American consumers the most diverse array of cutting-edge products that support health, anywhere in the world.

Action Alert! Write to Congress and tell them to oppose mandatory product listing for supplements. Please send your message immediately.

(Go to top link to fill out form to your reps)

For more:

Ivermectin Win: FDA Must Remove Controversial Verbiage From its Website While DOJ Attempts to Shut Down Pfizer Fraud Case

**UPDATE**

Besides bad-mouthing ivermectin, a U.S. government ‘cartel’ bribed large pharmacy chains like Walgreens and CVS with billions of dollars in contracts to promote COVID-19 vaccines and not fill prescriptions for ivermectin.  See:  The FDA’s War Against America’s Health

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-dr-mary-talley-bowden-reacts

Agency Capitulates by Removing False Claims on Ivermectin from Social Media and Internet

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

Thursday evening March 21, 2024, in an unprecedented court case, the US FDA led by  Commissioner Robert Califf, MD, a previously respected Duke Cardiologist, has settled a court case and taken down all of its false and misleading claims on ivermectin. The drug has been part of community standard of care for the treatment of COVID-19 with an excellent safety profile and signals of benefit in 101 studies.

During 2021, in what has been called “A War on Ivermectin” the US FDA engaged in false and misleading tweets and public messaging to dissuade doctors, pharmacists, and patients from using the drug in The McCullough Protocol and similar multi-drug regimens for acute COVID-19.  (See link for article and video)

According to an Epoch Times article , a court ordered the FDA to walk-back its negative posts about using ivermectin for COVID:

  • Studies show ivermectin works against COVID the FDA itself cites, but it’s webpage currently states it is not authorized or approved for use in preventing or treating COVID.
  • The court settlement requires the FDA to delete multiple social media posts that are strongly against ivermectin.
  • For doing this, doctors who sued the agency are dismissing their claims.
  • According to one of the doctors who sued, “This landmark case sets an important precedent in limiting FDA overreach into the doctor-patient relationship.”
  • Another ivermectin prescribing doctor who saw lives saved states that due to FDA interference, “we will never know how many lives were affected because patients were denied access to a lifesaving treatment because their doctor was ‘just following the FDA.’”
  • The three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the law did not authorize the FDA to give medical advice.
  • Numerous doctors have chronicled the highly coordinated and timed actions between the FDA, CDC, AMA, APHA, and corporate controlled media to squash ivermectin – an extremely safe, cheap drug on the WHO’s essential list of medicines that has been used for decades without a prescription in many countries, including Africa which had essentially ZERO COVID due to the prolific use of the drug.

FDA can inform, but it has identified no authority allowing it to recommend consumers ‘stop’ taking medicine,” U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, wrote for the court. The appeals court remanded the case back to the district court.

Predictably, the FDA didn’t get the memo:
  • and has not “admitted any violation of law or any wrongdoing, disagrees with the plaintiffs’ allegation that the agency exceeded its authority in issuing the statements challenged in the lawsuit, and stands by its authority to communicate with the public regarding the products it regulates.”
  • and has not changed its position that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The agency has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19.”
Welcome to the Twilight Zone.

For a quick flashback, watch this video of a doctor being forcibly removed by police from a hospital board meeting simply for endorsing ivermectin that he used in his own private practice, and for evidently breaking protocol by whispering a “thanks” to a politician who questioned hospital policy. He shared at about 7:00 that doctors on staff at the hospital would come and see him to get ivermectin but would not speak their mind or prescribe it for fear of retribution from hospitals or their own medical groups. He states that 99% of doctors now have a contract with the hospital and are beholden to it, and that ‘brutal’ COVID treatment protocols, which one nurse blamed for 90% of hospital deaths, were followed to the letter due to government financial incentives.  Hospitals were simply not interested in early treatment which have saved lives and freed up hospital beds.

This video shows how the CARES Act signed into law in 2020 waived patient rights, and made hospitals rich (approx. 100K per COVID patient) due to these government incentives.

The ivermectin-prescribing doctor was unable to eat in the hospital employee lounge because he didn’t take the COVID shot.

And the reason the suit was brought in the first case was due to doctors suffering repercussions after prescribing ivermectin to patients with COVID.  Pharmacists refused to fill prescriptions.

The FDA is certainly guilty, as well as other government agencies.  But so are hospitals, medical groups like the AMA, APHA, ASHP, mainstream media, and doctors themselves.

Unless action is taken, this can and will happen again.

________________

https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-03-22-department-of-justice-intervenes-pfizer-fraud-case.

Collusion coverup: Department of Justice intervenes in Pfizer fraud case, in a corrupt attempt to shut the case down

03/22/2024  Lance D Johnson
Story at a glance: (summary by “Neo” LLM via Brighteon.AI)- The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) is attempting to shut down the Pfizer fraud case scheduled for April 17.- The lawsuit alleges that Pfizer-BioNTech violated the False Claims Act during their clinical trials and knowingly delivered a defective product to the world.- Former employee Brook Jackson, who worked at Ventavia Research Group (a company that conducted some of Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials), is suing Pfizer, her former employer Ventavia, and another Pfizer contractor, ICON plc.- The DOJ asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming it would be inconsistent with their public health policy.- The DOJ’s motion to dismiss cites a flimsy hypothesis authored by the FDA, which supports the faulty vaccines and contradicts Jackson’s claims of fraud and negligence.  (See link for article)

Pfizer sunk to unbelievable lows to peddle their gene therapy shots including using children in ads
The shot not only flopped, it caused more COVID infections & an inflammatory syndrome

For more:

WEF Planning to ‘Relaunch’ COVID ‘Pandemic’ Insider Warns

https://newsaddicts.com/wef-planning-relaunch-covid-pandemic-insider-warns/  Video Here (Approx. 9 Min)

WEF Planning to ‘Relaunch’ Covid Pandemic, Insider Warns

A bioweapons industry insider has blown the whistle to warn the public that the World Economic Forum (WEF) is planning to “relaunch” the Covid pandemic in order to finalize its “Great Reset” agenda.

According to Dr. Harvey Risch, a bioweapons expert and Yale University professor and epidemiologist, the “next pandemic” is about to erupt “seemingly out of nowhere.”

Risch warns that globalist elites are not finished with Covid yet, despite the appearance that the pandemic is “over.”

While the last pandemic may have failed to fully usher in the WEF’s “Great Reset,” another, more deadly Covid outbreak would surely complete the transition.

Both the “virus,” so-called, and the “vaccine,” so-called, were the perfect excuse for America’s bioweapons industry to boost itself as something the nation requires in order to serve the public good by protecting We the People against disease – or so it claims.

Dr. Risch is now alerting top trusted lawmakers in the hope of blocking the plans.  (See link for article and video)

_______________

**Comment**

Risch is not alone.  Seems it came stright from the horses mouth and Benzinga reported that WHO Director-General Tedros Ghebreyesus sounded the alarm that its a “matter of when not if” a new pandemic, infamously called ‘Disease X,’ will strike.  This sounds similar to billionaire Bill Gates’s recent public concerns that “we’re making the same mistakes again” by failing to adequately prepare.

But researchers are preparing by using breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) to further speed up future vaccine development against Disease X. The Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations is providing up to $4.98 million to the Houston Methodist Research Institute to use AI to do just that. They aim to use AI to analyze the structures of potential viruses that may be the eventual Disease X and then identify specific parts of their proteins that cause an immune response. For now, their efforts focus on viruses such as Nipah and Lassa, but their goal is to get the time to develop a vaccine against a pandemic down to just 100 days.

Gee, what could go wrong?

Meanwhile, Politico reported that a growing dependence on artificial intelligence could pose a danger to the U.S. financial system, and regulators need to rethink their siloed approach to rule-making to minimize the risk, Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler said.

I’m sure trusting AI to create a ‘vaccine’ in 100 days to be put in human bodies is much safer, right?