Archive for March, 2023

Spartacus is Back: Why You Shouldn’t Take the COVID “Vaccine”

Spartacus is back with another powerful article explaining in detail why these injections should be taken off the market immediately and criminal charges should be brought against everyone involved in their manufacture and distribution, and everyone who mandated them.

https://iceni.substack.com/p/psa-why-you-shouldnt-take-the-vaccine#details

PSA – Why You Shouldn’t Take the Vaccine

A highly condensed primer on why these vaccines are so dangerous

Spartacus

Feb. 25, 2023

If someone you know is planning on taking a COVID-19 vaccine, here is why they shouldn’t do it, in a nutshell.

COVID-19 vaccines, particularly the mRNA platform behind the Pfizer and Moderna shots, were developed with shady DARPA biodefense money and venture capital funding, much of it going to a company that, for over a decade, had no commercial products whatsoever, whose CEO formerly worked for another company whose founder helped build the P4 lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. These injectables were obtained by our governments under contracts that absolve their manufacturers of any liability for the injuries they may cause.

PEGylated lipid nanoparticles are highly inflammatory synthetic oils conjugated with polyethylene glycol. These PEGylated lipids have been known to cause anaphylaxis in an unlucky few.  (See link for article as well as an audio version of the article)

Please share widely.

_______________

**Comment**

This, right here, is a “must read” as is Spartacus’ other article posted on this website which is another detailed account of what COVID actually is, what treatments work, what doesn’t and why, and why virtually everything else the ‘experts’ said is wrong.

It’s really important to read about the military aspect of the COVID shots, as well as understand the Chinese connection.  The origin of COVID remains shrouded by being classified, with U.S. senators demanding these documents be accessible to the public.

It’s also important to know about the work of Charles Liebner which continues today through Jia Lui of Harvard who patented Lieber’s work – nanoscale wires/electronics which can be embedded in biological structures such as tissues and organs to apply an electrical stimulus to the biological structure.  It’s all very creepy, dystopian globalist, WEF, WHO, NATO, UN, digitization, AI stuff designed to control the public and virtually all aspects of life on planet earth.

Once you go down all the right bunny holes, everything becomes much more clear.
The conspiracies are not theories, but are in fact very real and have frightening implications.

For more:

CA Ticks Spread Lyme But That’s Not the Whole Story

https://www.globallymealliance.org/blog/california-ticks-can-spread-lyme-disease-but-thats-not-the-whole-story

If you find a tick bite from an Ixodes tick in California, it’s important to consider possible exposure to pathogens that cause more than Lyme disease

Originally published on Medzulabs.org 

The risk of contracting Lyme disease from a tick bite in California has been well-documented, though there is still a long way to go in educating health providers and the broader community in the exposure risk from a tick bite. TickReport’s surveillance of ticks from California (and Oregon and Washington) goes back as far as 2006 and has expanded in recent years.

What ticks are endemic (commonly and consistently found in wild populations) to California and other West Coast states?

That’s a big question, and there are a few dozen species from different genera or families. Many of those species are specialist feeders and—if everything goes “right” in their life cycle—they will only feed on certain wild mammals, birds, or lizards and will bite humans very rarely. That’s doesn’t mean that finding one of these “specialists” attached to ourselves or a family member is impossible: it’s just much less common (and a topic we’ll try to visit soon in another post).

Our surveillance shows that the majority (91.5%) of human or human-adjacent (dogs, cats, horses, etc) tick bites are caused by the following ticks:

  • Ixodes pacificus (“Western black-legged tick,” a close relative of the Deer tick in the Eastern U.S.)
  • Dermacentor variabilis (“American dog tick”)
  • Dermacentor occidentalis (“Pacific Coast tick”)
  • Dermacentor andersoni (“Rocky Mountain Wood tick”)
  • Ixodes spinipalpis
  • Ixodes angustus
What pathogens can these ticks transmit to humans?

Vector competence (the ability of a vector like a tick to transmit a given disease-causing pathogen) tends to run along genus lines, so species within the Ixodes genus tend to be able to transmit pathogens X and Y but not Z, while Dermacentor species tend to transmit Z but not X and Y.

The most common pathogen found in California ticks is Borrelia burgdorferi, which causes Lyme disease in humans and pets. But there’s more than Lyme in those hills! If you find a tick bite from an Ixodes tick in California, it’s also important to consider possible exposure to these pathogens:

  • Borrelia miyamotoi: a bacterium that can cause hard tick relapsing fever—sometimes called Borrelia miyamotoi disease.
  • Anaplasma phagocytophilum: a bacterium that can cause Human granulocyctic Anaplasmosis.
*For every two ticks we find infected with Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease bacteria), we detect one (or more) of these other pathogens

It’s vital that both tick surveillance and diagnostic approaches keep these non-Lyme pathogens in mind. For every two ticks we find infected with Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease bacteria), we detect one (or more) of these other pathogens, so be sure to resist Lyme Tunnel Vision when responding to a tick bite! Common diagnostic tests for Lyme disease have a specific focus on Lyme disease and will not detect infection by these other pathogens if present. Make sure you and your doctor are considering the whole story of a tick bite.

To learn more about the pathogens we find in West Coast ticks, browse our real-time testing data at TickReport.com/stats. If you find and remove a tick, arrange for fast and accurate identification and testing at TickReport.com.
The above material is provided for information purposes only. The material (a) is not nor should be considered, or used as a substitute for, medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment, nor (b) does it necessarily represent endorsement by or an official position of Global Lyme Alliance, Inc. or any of its directors, officers, advisors or volunteers. Advice on the testing, treatment or care of an individual patient should be obtained through consultation with a physician who has examined that patient or is familiar with that patient’s medical history. 

Paul Killinger oversees tick surveillance and pathogen testing at the TickReport testing lab in Amherst, Massachusetts. He has led the lab's public health education and outreach since 2018.

Reversible Dementia Caused By Lyme: Case Study

https://www.globallymealliance.org/news/2023-case-study-reversible-dementia-caused-by-lyme-disease

A case of reversible dementia with Lyme treatment?

Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research (Sanchini, C., et al.) 2.6.23, published “A case of reversible dementia? Dementia vs delirium in Lyme disease.” The report describes a case of a 75-year-old man who was admitted to the Alzheimer’s Disease Care Unit of the Institute Golgi in Abbiategrasso, Italy.

According to the case report, the man had been recently discharged from a local hospital with a diagnosis of “cognitive impairment, deficit of memory, and poor capacity of criticism compatible with degenerative disease.”

The patient was a multilingual interpreter with a high school degree. He enjoyed walking in the countryside with his dog, but he had been experiencing knee pain – for about a month. The pain would worsen and migrate to his other joints. The case also reports that he had been showing minor memory deficiency and ideomotor slowdown.

A CT scan showed abnormalities, but blood tests were within normal ranges, the only thing noted was increased inflammation. As time went on, the patient became more confused and disoriented, presenting with hallucinations, aggressive behavior, and insomnia.

With the patient having arthritis, he was tested for Lyme. Lyme antibodies were detected by the western blot. Initial intravenous ceftriaxone treatments did not alleviate the patient’s symptoms. Oral doxycycline was administered as well as a brief course of quetiapine to manage the hallucinations.

Soon after 6–7 days of antibiotic therapy, delusional symptoms and hallucinations were reduced, and his insomnia improved. Urinary incontinence completely resolved. His behavioral profile also improved, with a reduction in agitation, aggression, and depression. His language became more fluent and communicative.

Read the full case study here.

_______________

**Comment**

This proves that antimicrobial therapy helps Lyme/MSIDS patients, unfortunately, this patient will most probably suffer relapses as this duration of therapy has been proven to be insufficient time and time again.  Herein lies one of the most glaring problems that has not changed in 40 years.  The other glaring problem is the coinfection involvement that often occurs, necessitating different medications.

But, the band plays on…..

For more:

How many more dementia/Alzheimer’s patients have undiagnosed tick-borne illness?

Lancet Three Years Late & 10 Myths Now Debunked. The CDC Must Not Survive COVID

**Update March, 2023**

Senior Fellow of the Hoover Institution, and previous COVID adviser, Dr. Scott W. Atlas, was also featured in Newsweek, in the opinion section of course, where he details how America’s COVID response was based on lies.  Similarly to the video below that exposes 10 myths, Atlas has his own “10 biggest falsehoods” about COVID, known for years to be false:

  1. COVID has a far higher fatality rate than the flu.  FALSE
  2. Everyone is at significant risk to die from it.  FALSE
  3. No one has any immunological protection because it’s completely new.  FALSE
  4. Asymptomatic people are major drivers of the spread.  FALSE
  5. Locking down will stop or eliminate it.  FALSE
  6. Masks will protect and stop the spread.  FALSE
  7. The virus is natural, and claiming it’s from a lab is a conspiracy theory.  FALSE
  8. Teachers are at especially high risk.  FALSE
  9. COVID “vaccines” stop the spread.  FALSE
  10. Immune protection only comes from a “vaccine.”  FALSE

Although I posted on the Lancet’s review previously, the following articles are important because people are becoming emboldened to speak out on the absolute lunacy of the past three years which includes the denial of natural immunity (among MANY other issues still waiting in the sidelines to be rectified) by public health, mainstream medicine and media.  These same groups then censored, threatened, and maligned anyone who disagreed with their lunacy.  Jobs and reputations were forever lost due to unscientific edicts causing untold damage.

There appears to be a new trend in mainstream media that is allowing for a few orchestrated concessions in the COVID wars. The latest opinion piece highlighted below from the NY Post titled: “10 Myths Told by COVID Experts – and Now Debunked” is one such example; however, many still remain emotionally and powerfully entrenched in government issued directives that don’t work at all despite the admissions of fact.

http://

Link

Expert Testimony: “The Greatest Perpetrator of ‘Misinformation’ During the Pandemic Has Been the United States Government.”

The Hill

March, 2023

In short, the following myths have been debunked:  (please share this widely – the madness needs to end)

  1. Natural immunity offers little protection compared to vaccinesFALSE  (Most Americans who were fired for not getting the clot shot already had antibodies which the government refused to recognize.)
  2. Masks prevent COVID transmission.  FALSE (But CDC director Walensky downplayed the latest study because it focused on randomized controlled studies, which are normally considered the gold standard of evidence!)
  3. School closures reduce COVID transmission. FALSE (CDC ignored European experience which showed transmission rates were no different.)
  4. Myocarditis from the “vaccine” is less common than from the infection. FALSE (it’s actually 6-28 times more common after the injections and tens of thousands of kids likely got subclinical myocarditis)
  5. Young people benefit from a “vaccine” booster. FALSE (the FDA’s top two vaccine experts left the agency in protest because there is no data to support this at all)
  6. “Vaccine” mandates increased “vaccination” rates. FALSE (the Biden regime demanded that unvaxxed workers, soldiers, and health care workers be fired, discharged, and laid off regardless of their risk or natural immunity and despite the fact the shots do not reduce transmission or infection and actually set you up for illness).
  7. COVID originating from the Wuhan lab is a conspiracy theoryFALSE (overwhelming circumstantial evidence points to a lab leak, and patents prove shady deals).
  8. It’s important to get the 2nd COVID shot dose 3-4 weeks after the first dose.  FALSE  (data show that spacing the vaccine by 3 months reduces complication rates, but why get it at all since it’s ineffective and linked to adverse events and even death?)
  9. Data on the bivalent “vaccine” is ‘crystal clear.’  FALSE  (data that was used to approve it was based on EIGHT mice)  
  10. 1 in 5 people get long COVID.  FALSE (UK study found only 3% had residual symptoms lasting 12 weeks. Calling cases that experience mild fatigue or weakness for a few weeks after illness “long COVID” is the medicalization of ordinary life.)

https://www.wsj.com/articles/three-years-late-the-lancet-recognizes-natural-immunity-great-barrington-declaration-tech-censor-antibodies-mandates

Three Years Late, the Lancet Recognizes Natural Immunity

The public-health clerisy rediscovers a principle of immunology it derided throughout the pandemic.

The Lancet medical journal this month published a review of 65 studies that concluded prior infection with Covid—i.e., natural immunity—is at least as protective as two doses of mRNA vaccines. The most surprising news was that the study made the mainstream press.  (See link for article)

The article is behind a paywall, but Brencha Baletti, Ph.D. writes for The Defender and gives the following important quote by Finley:

“The Lancet study’s vindication of natural immunity fits a pandemic pattern: The public-health clerisy rejects an argument that ostensibly threatens its authority; eventually it’s forced to soften its position in the face of incontrovertible evidence; and yet not once does it acknowledge its opponents were right.”

Truer words were never spoken, and while some have been onto the scam from the get-go, many people are still confused or remain staunch in following futile public health dictates, which have caused more harm than good.  Further, corrupt public health has not come clean but has offered meaningless platitudes with no real change, and then has the gall to ask for more money and power, and double down on fruitless pandemic measures.

Again, for the hard of hearing: No Amnesty for Branch Covidians.

This denial and censorship of natural immunity has also caused untold damage, including pushing people to get dangerous and ineffective experimental gene therapy injections that have been linked to more reports of adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.  Sadly, the damage continues.

Which brings up another good point:

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/cdc-must-not-survive-covid-19

CDC Must Not Survive COVID-19

They have $10.1Bln Discretionary Funds and got everything – EVERYTHING – wrong. By my estimation, the health of all future generations is at stake. We cannot accept a stalemate.

Discretionary Budget Authority (CDC):  10.1 BILLION dollars

Discretionary Budget Authority (IPAK):  84 thousand dollars

CDC receives 14.1 million times more funding than IPAK. Think about that. Given the run I’ve given them in challenging them to embark on object research, I’d say that it’s fairly clear that we should invest heavily in independent research.

A Timeline of Highlights

When I started looking into vaccine safety studies in 2014 for a book on biomedical research, I was looking for success stories in translational research. When, at the last moment, I decided to add a chapter on vaccines, I thought it would be easy. So easy, in fact, I expected the vaccine chapter to be the easiest to write for the book.

Along the journey that followed, I appeared in the Netflix Documentary “Pandemic” – before the pandemic, was hunted by a group of amateurs affiliated with the BBC (leading to their taking down a Youtube video and performing correcting edits). I’ve been on national news stations, uncountable radio spots and podcasts, all with the same message: CDC has destroyed trust in public health by warping science to the point where it is unrecognizable as such to those who are trained to know the difference.

The CDC’s reliance on the myth of their reputation as a definitive authority for reliable information was a massive error: sooner or later, someone was bound to look and find facts that run counter to CDC’s blustery claims, such as

(a) not all vaccines had been tested for association with autism (my “Magic” presentation @ Life University, 2015)

(b) some studies did, in fact, find association with autism (my “Magic” Presentation @ Life University, 2015)

(c) true insert saline placebos were not used in most of the vaccine studies (ICANDecide.org)

We were on a serious roll. Then COVID-19 hit. Here’s a timeline with some of the key events and initiatives I’ve been involved in – not for boasting, but for resource use.

Time and time again, my analyses have caught CDC, FDA, Pfizer, Moderna, and others falling far short of basing their positions on their own data. From the actual initial efficacy of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines (75%, not 95%), to fudged report after report on the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, I watched the march of efficacy decline until the evidence of negative efficacy was irrefutable.

Between my own analyses and the analyses of the hundreds of people who have contributed to the awareness stream, I am now at the point where I find the following assertations are well-founded, if not self-evident:

  1. Allopathic medicine is now under the total control of Public Health.
  2. There will be a ten-to-hundred-fold increase in the rate of chronic illness as a result of the COVID-19 vaccine program.
  3. The mRNA is taken up by our genomes.
  4. Epigenetic and genetic effects of the mRNA vaccine are a certainty.
  5. Increased cancer risk is a necessary result.
  6. The mRNA vaccines have altered the course of human evolution in a major way (selection against those who cannot tolerate mRNA vaccines).
  7. Many who are vaccinated may be permanently sterile.
  8. All physicians must nevertheless turn to the question: what is the best for my patient now?

(See link for article and evidence of building the next phase of whatever is to come)

For more on the corrupt CDC:

COVID Lab Leak or Animal Origin Ping Pong Match

**UPDATE**

Evidently experts are warning that lawmakers misrepresented this bill as it limits the types of documents the government must declassify, reducing the culpability of the U.S. and private actors – raising questions about the bill’s real intent which is perhaps to place the full blame on China.  Information not related to the Wuhan lab is not being requested and would probably remain classified.  Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., professor of international law at the University of Illinois states the bill is a “classic Nixonian limited hangout.”  Experts expect redactions and the NIH has stonewalled FOIA requests.

According to this well written piece by Spartacus, the two-sided ping-pong match is a false dichotomy as there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence that points toward an intentional release of COVID.  Independent journalist Sam Husseini also warns against making assumptions by calling it a “lab leak” theory, which presumes it was a mistake, when it may have been intentional, and this article points out that while Dr. Malone deserves credit for pointing out COVID lockdowns were deadly, propaganda was used to promote gene therapy and suppress early treatment, and that “the ‘vaccine’ injured exist,” he appears to be framing the debate by strictly limiting the spectrum of acceptable opinion.  In short he wants us to believe the gene therapy shots caused harm because they were rushed, everyone behind COVID tyranny and gain of function research and biotechnology had good intentions even if it was for “power and money,” and we should all join hands and sing Kumbaya.

COVID Lab Leak or Animal Origin Ping Pong Match

A classified 2021 document from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence showed the intelligence committee was divided as to the origins of COVID-19. Then, The State Department assessed in a document (pdf) made public in 2022, that a lab leak was the most likely origin for COVID-19, while the National Intelligence Council and four intelligence community elements, which were not identified, assessed with low confidence that COVID came from animals.  Now with new intelligence, the Energy Department now states a lab leak is the most likely origin of COVID, despite Mainstream media and “fact checkers” continuing to classify websites that state as much as “fake” news.

Now, low and behold, just two days after this new report, FBI chief Christopher Wray confirms agency’s belief COVID came from a Chinese lab leak, when he appeared in an interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier and stated:

“The FBI has for quite some time now assessed that the origins of the pandemic are mostly likely a potential lab incident in Wuhan, China.”

Wray was quick to deflect and blame China but remained mute about our own government’s involvement to patent, control, and profit from the coronovirus which dates back 1999, with a documented account showing a highly orchestrated plan.

Wray wouldn’t share much because it’s all conveniently classified, and the White House is refusing to confirm or deny the DOE report by stating there’s no “consensus” on how it all began.

And as if on cue, Anthony Fauci came out of retirement to state, “we may never know” the source of the outbreak and urged people to keep an “open mind to all possibilities” in an interview with the Boston Globe. Interestingly USAID gave 10 times the amount of money to Wuhan than Fauci did, and according to Robert Kennedy Jr. USAID and Eco-health Alliance are CIA front groups.  The CIA modeled this outbreak in 2019 twice, the second time at Event 201.

This video shows how time and time again, Fauci denied the lab leak, until now.  Why now?  Could it be because China is considering selling weapons to Russia for the war in Ukraine?

Is your neck hurting yet?

In an exclusive interview with The Defender, Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., a bioweapons expert and professor of international law at the University of Illinois who authored the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, questioned the timing of these revelations and the overall conclusions of the intelligence community.

He said:

“My assessment of this situation is that it’s a classic Nixonian limited hangout that finally, for whatever reason, has put out there part of the truth, which is that, yes, COVID-19 leaked out of the Wuhan BSL4 [biosafety level 4], which everyone has been denying now for the last three years.

“But if you note they still deny that it is an offensive biological warfare weapon with gain-of-function properties.”

Boyle then went on to say:

“There was no way anything that Big Pharma created — a vaccine — was going to be either ‘safe’ or ‘effective.’ We have had no evidence to believe that any vaccine has been safe or effective when it comes to a biological warfare weapon, let alone with gain-of-function properties.

“And so, I regret to say that all the evidence since then has proven me correct that these so-called ‘vaccines’ — I call them ‘Franken shots’ because I don’t think they’re entitled to the word ‘vaccine’ — are either safe or effective.”

Boyle does not express much confidence in the Congressional committees investigating COVID as he feels the members can easily be bought off by Big Pharma campaign contributions.

If we rewind the tape for a refresher, you’ll remember that Shi Zhengli, aka “Bat Woman,” knew how to convert a virus that only infected bats into one that could infect humans since 2007.

CDC director Robert Redfield was aware of the 2015 gain-of-function study funded by EcoHealth Alliance, carried out in Dr. Ralph Baric’s lab in the University of North Carolina’s lab, and published by Bat Woman which showed it was possible to manipulate a SARS-like bat coronavirus so that it would infect human cells.  But when Fauci was urged by Redfield to vigorously investigate the origins of COVID in early 2020, he was quickly excommunicadoed from discussions and a powerful and concerted PR campaign was waged denouncing the lab leak theory as a conspiracy theory. 

Then came the Vanity Fair exposé which proved Fauci and Collins used their power to silence scientists who raised questions that could implicate NIH’s financial support for EcoHealth Alliance and the risky virus research being done in China with U.S. tax dollars.  Points for consideration:

  • EcoHealth Alliance operated in a world of “murky grant agreements, flimsy oversight, and the pursuit of government funds
  • The group’s president, Peter Daszak, spent years wooing Fauci to win federal money for gain-of-function studies in China
    • The company received a $3.7 million in 2014 to study a deadly new coronavirus from wild bats in China
    • They then turned around and gave $600,000 in federal funds to China to collect bat virus samples and analyze them
    • To add insult to injury, a probe has been launched as there is evidence China double-billed the U.S. for projects in Wuhan and that the U.S. made duplicate payments through the NIH and USAID for medical supplies, equipment, salaries, and travel expenses.  Tens of millions of dollars could be involved.
  • Fauci, in turn, worked with Daszak, Collins, and other top virologists to lead a well-documented campaign discrediting the lab-leak theory, all the while never being completely transparent about their potential conflicts of interest should the theory prove true.
    • Prior to the infamous organized secret conference call with 11 top international virologists, but which omitted Redfield, virologists had noted features of SARS-CoV-2 “(potentially) look engineered,” but after the call, suddenly these same virologists would condemn the lab-leak hypothesis and those who believed in it, and published “The Proximal Origins of SARS-CoV-2,” in the journal Nature Medicine on March 17.
    • Predictably, mainstream media seized on the statement, inaccurately referring to it as a “study” that purportedly debunked the lab-leak theory
    • These leading virologists then pocketed over $25.2 M between 2020 and 2022 from the NIH according to federal grant data reviewed by The Washington Examiner.
  • Then there was Peter Daszak’s own campaign to organize scientists to denounce the lab-leak theory as a “conspiracy” and his effusive praise for Fauci’s public comments asserting the same.
  • American scientist, Dr. Jesse Bloom discovered Chinese researchers appeared to have deleted data from a NIH virus sample database on early genomic sequences for COVID
  • He then learned the NIH itself had deleted the data, at the request of Chinese researchers
  • Collins organized a Zoom meeting to discuss all of this, but the meeting was “extremely contentious” and Bloom was told it would be unethical to analyze the deleted viral sequences since Chinese scientists wanted them deleted
    • Instead of giving scientific points to counter Bloom’s points, a shouting match ensued and one of the virologists stated he “needed security outside his house, and my preprint would fuel conspiratorial notions that China was hiding data and thereby lead to more criticism of scientists such as himself.” 
    • The icing on the cake came when a virologist who is a screener at the preprint server offered to delete Bloom’s preprint or revise it “in a way that would leave no record that this had been done”
    • Bloom responded that it would not be appropriate to secretly delete or alter the paper “given the contentious nature of the meeting.”
    • A NIH representative quibbles with the word “delete” and insists that they in fact “suppressed” the genetic sequences of the virus, kind of like when CDC director Walensky states they are “pivoting” language on what it means to be fully vaxxed. The NIH did not respond to congressional oversight requests or the The Epic Times FOIA request. Only after The Epic Times sued to enforce its request did the institute release the redacted documents. Source
      • Fauci, Collins, and Walensky are expert Wordsmiths. They redirect, filibuster, ignore questions, and redefine and manipulate wordsdefinitions, and statistics.  During the deposition, Fauci repeatedly claimed he “couldn’t recall” or “couldn’t remember,” and pretended he didn’t understand questions
      • Fauci and Collins have been expertly deceiving the public for decades
      • This account chronicles Fauci’s many lies.  FUN FACT: Until very recently, Fauci’s daughter worked for Twitter
  • Fauci knew the lab-leak theory had merit from the beginning but immediately discredited it, despite it having less than a 1 in 100 million chance of having a natural origin
  • In Jan. 2023, Jeffrey Sachs, chair of the Lancet COVID-19 commission which was created to investigate the origins of COVID, gave an interview where he alleges SARS-CoV2 originated from dangerous gain of function experiments sponsored and conducted by US biotech institutions. He alleges a vast cover-up of Covid origins, including by former members of his commission, and details the personal attacks he has incurred for speaking out
  • We mustn’t forget whistleblower Andrew G. Huff, former EcoHealth Alliance VP and senior scientist who is an expert in bioterrorism and bio warfare who wrote a book detailing how and why the US swapped biotechnology with China and biomedical corporations and the incentives for each of the actors or government to engage and coordinate a global cover-up of COVID’s origins. He also experienced a frightening PSYOP against him by the government to prevent him from speaking out
  • Fauci and is now suddenly open to the lab-leak theory.  The timing of this is turnaround is curious as China is now considering selling weapons to Russia for the war in Ukraine.

http://   Approx. 22 Min

Link

Lab Leak Liars: Sky News Names Names

March 1, 2023

With this clearer picture in view, it’s obvious to anyone with half a brain that our own government is behind COVID and is now in damage control.

For more:

He, along with numerous other scientists, states the virus (COVID-19) has been manipulated and that components of HIV have been inserted into the viral sequence, perhaps in pursuit of an AIDS vaccine.

He mentions that the U.S. funded the Wuhan lab in China. Dr. Fauci, head of NIAID and part of the coronavirus task force, is the one who sent U.S. tax payer money to China after a moratorium was given to stop this sort of research. That is called breaking the law and he should be in jail.