Archive for August, 2021

Over 32,000 Dead Brazilians After COVID Jabs

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/over-32000-people-dead-in-brazil-following-covid-19-vaccines-according-to-official-media-report/

Over 32,000 People DEAD in Brazil Following COVID-19 Vaccines According to Official Media Report

A COVID-19 ward in a hospital in Londrina, Brazil. Elderly are frequently hospitalized after two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine. Source.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

A Health Impact News reader from Brazil has alerted us to official media reports stating that during a 5-month period, over 32,000 people in Brazil have died following a COVID-19 injection.

Currently in Brazil, the following vaccines are authorized for use: AstraZeneca/Oxford, Pfizer/BioNTech, Coronavac (also called Sinovac), J&J/Janssen, and Butanvac.

The report was published on uol.com.br, which reportedly has about the same number of page views as CNN.com, according to data from SimilarWeb. It is so big, that ICANN has given its own domain: .uol.

Despite these high amounts of deaths following vaccination, the report states:

“Vaccination is still the best way to control the disease.”

But even these cases of deaths following COVID-19 injections might be under-reported, as the country’s state news agency reported in July that in the small state of Distrito Federal, at least 711 died after taking the first experimental vaccine, while another 263 people died after taking two doses of the experimental vaccines. (Source.)

Brazil’s state news agency reports:

Vaccination does not prevent re-infection or the evolution to more serious conditions, including death. Therefore, the Health Secretary stressed the importance of keeping the prevention measures against the new coronavirus.

“We are always alerting people to wear masks, wash their hands, use alcohol gel, and avoid crowds. Even if we are vaccinated, we can acquire the virus and have complications”, he declared. (Source.)

Parts of this article were translated by DeepL.

__________________

**Comment**

Just to be clear, masks don’t work against this virus.  Period.  They can also cause harm:

Harm caused by masks:

The CDC and WHO know masks don’t work.  

But more importantly, our bodies were designed with an immune system that needs to be challenged to be effective. We are tactile creatures that need to breathe, touch, and be touched. Living in a sterile environment actually predisposes you to allergies and other serious immune issues.

These Oxford scientists put it best:

Today, our bewildered Prime Minister and his platoon of inept advisers might as well be using the planets to guide us through this pandemic, so catastrophic and wildly over-the-top are their decisions.  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/09/25/the-only-circuit-break-in-the-pandemic-we-need-now-is-from-the-governments-doom-mongering-scientific-advisers-who-specialize-in-causing-panic-and-little-else-say-prof-carl-henneghan-and-dr-tom/

For the latest VAERS data and a mounting list of adverse reactions and deaths reported after COVID shots:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

“Condemned to Die With No Right To Try” Dr. Rowan

https://www.clinmedjournals.org/articles/jide/journal-of-infectious-diseases-and-epidemiology-jide-7-199.php?jid=jide

Unholy Interlocking of Government, Corporate, and Medical Dogma Sacrifices Lives – The Semmelweis Saga Resurrected

Robert Jay Rowen, MD1*

1Private Medical Practice, 2200 County Center Dr. Ste C, Santa Rosa, California, 95403, USA

Some two centuries ago, Ignaz Semmelweis observed that hand washing with a chlorinated lime solution (an oxidizing agent) would curb infection mortality related to the maternity ward. He was scorned and castigated by his peers for daring to suggest hand washing between dissecting cadavers and delivering babies. Medicine should have learned from this debacle. Has it?

Today we face unprecedented crises in infectious diseases. Pharmaceutical antibiotic drugs that ushered in the medical era are being neutralized by innovative pathogens acquiring resistance or collectively organizing in impossible to treat biofilms. According to the CDC, “more than 2.8 million antibiotic-resistant (“superbug”) infections occur in the U.S. each year, and more than 35,000 people die as a result. In addition, 223,900 cases of Clostridioides difficile occurred in 2017 and at least 12,800 people died” [1].

Despite witnessing the growth of resistance to antibiotics (which are patented for profit), there has been no interest in promoting the defensive innate processes in the human body, which creates innate oxidizing germicides (H2O2, singlet oxygen, ozone, hypochlorite, etc.) to hurl at invaders. In fact, just the opposite occurs, in large part due to the reflex rejection of highly efficacious therapies [2]. Hence, few in the medical field are aware of any alternative to chemical medicine, and fewer will consider “unapproved” therapy, even to save lives [3].

I provide the following first-hand knowledge and will elaborate.

1. In 2018, this practitioner was begged to come and minister ozone therapy to a man (husband, father and airline pilot) dying of a superbug infection in a Texas hospital. Despite the promise of a liability waiver, the hospital denied me access stating: “Policy”. The helpless man died in front of his grieving family. Several years before, a hospitalized beloved Northern California integrative physician died of lethal infection after the institution denied the requests of family and physician friends to administer high dose intravenous ascorbate.

2. One erudite layman, who is a prominent trustee of a major mid-west teaching hospital, asked the infectious disease chairman (ID) if he would permit the use of ultraviolet blood irradiation (UBI) in the hospital to save an otherwise unsalvageable patient. ID responded, “Is it FDA approved?”

Answer, “No”.

ID response, “Then I would not permit it”.

Trustee’s reply, “Then you would let the patient die rather than even tell the patient’s family about UBI?”

ID answer: “Yes”.

The trustee was aghast. “That death could be me!”

3. This practitioner took an associate to, and, led a group in Sierra Leone to use ozone therapy to rapidly cure 100% of 5 cases of the most lethal virus the world has ever known – Ebola (mortality rate – 60%). The report was submitted to major journals which summarily rejected the novel report, one stating: “we don’t think this will be of interest to our general practicing readers.” While ignoring a major potential breakthrough in acute actual viral disease management, the journal was concurrently publishing articles on vaccines for Ebola. A vaccine was of more interest to its European readers than a possible penny costing cure? The ozone breakthrough was later published in the African Journal of Infectious Diseases [4].

4. A south Florida hospital applied for an IND for ozone use in COVID. (2020) The FDA demanded expensive animal studies, despite thousands of publications on ozone and a virtually 100% safety record over many decades. Even “compassionate use” was not considered.

5. Two reporters, one for a small-time news outlet, and the other, a famous reporter for a huge NYC daily, attempted to publish articles on ozone therapy early in the COVID-19 outbreak. Their higher-ups canned publication. Both were shocked.

The world is in deadly “Catch-22” considering non-patentable therapies which might save lives. Therapies that have been studied and reported successful with complete safety for scores of years are called “anecdotal” by the FDA because clinical trials that incur huge unrecoverable costs have not been done. Millions of successful treatments are “anecdotal”. What utter nonsense. These therapies are shunned, even to the tune of watching a patient die.

Condemned to Die with No Right to Try

This seemingly corrupt paradigm has been coined: “Condemned to Die with No Right to Try” [5]. Promising but not “approved” therapies are dead on arrival. Currently, institutional (and individual) “policy” (not law) prevents hospitals (and most conventional physicians) from any consideration of non-FDA approved therapies.

The government/industrial complex has been inserted between the doctor and his patient’s needs/welfare.

This begs the question of the morality of a system that proactively denies a dying patient a chance. What has medicine (and society) become if we chose or permit sacrifice of lives for profit, policy, personal, and corporate interests?

Closer to the practicing physicians lie the state medical boards. Many have attacked doctors’ therapies not “approved” by the FDA. This also leads to death. Medical errors, most often using FDA approved treatments, are the third leading cause of American deaths [6]. FDA approved drugs are the fourth leading cause of American deaths [7]. Approved antibiotics, particularly the newer ones, even when properly administered, can lead to very severe injury.

This journal published the first article on the use of ozone therapy for coronavirus [8]. Since then, several articles have emerged echoing the wisdom of using ozone therapy [9,10], and articles have been published on its success [11–13]. Yet there has been no move by authorities to investigate this reportedly virtually 100% safe treatment, whilst governments expend trillions on novel vaccine research, development and distribution.

CDC reports half a million COVID deaths in the USA alone. Many doctors, including me, reached out to officials with ozone information, only to be shunned. Other oxidation therapies (intravenous hydrogen peroxide [14], ultraviolet blood irradiation (UBI) [15–17], intravenous ascorbate [18]) were reported in the last century to cure or mitigate untreatable serious viral (pneumonia, polio) and bacterial infections, with 100% safety and high efficacy, yet few if any infectious disease experts are so aware. Of course, none of these are patentable for profit (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Knott Hemo-irradiator, circa 1958, original American UBI device, FDA “grandfathered”. View Figure 1

Oxidation therapies harness and augment the body’s own innate pro-oxidant (germicidal) primal defenses against invaders. Ozone is actually produced in the body, and hydrogen peroxide is one of its mediators of action. High dose ascorbate is a pro-drug for hydrogen peroxide. UBI is another oxidant. These therapies have several commonalities. They have been reported: 1) Absolutely safe when properly administered, 2) Highly effective, and, 3) Because they are a “natural cure” in the public domain for many decades, they cannot be patented for profit, remaining unstudied to the degree needed for regulatory agency “approval”. Consequently, they suffer instant rejection. The medical annihilation style of Ignaz Semmelweis remains, morphing from proscribing promising sanitation to proscribing and condemning promising therapies by medical practitioners.

Solutions to the Dilemma

There are solutions to the dilemma. Current hospital practices are based on policy and not law. Change must begin at the lowest level rather than expect an agency (FDA), highly influenced by a revolving door of Pharma interests within the agency, to begin change. Leaving the FDA board should immediately disqualify one from Pharma employment for five years. Having any financial interest in Big Pharma should disqualify one from FDA employment or office.

After all, despite thousands of international articles on ozone therapy, the official stance of the FDA remains:

“Ozone is a toxic gas with no known useful medical application in specific, adjunctive, or preventive therapy. In order for ozone to be effective as a germicide, it must be present in a concentration far greater than that which can be safely tolerated by man and animals” [19].

This statement, while actually a regulation, is blatantly false. Its continuing presence has certainly condemned patients to death. Physicians and hospitals will not look past it. Water is also toxic, as is ozone, if inhaled. It also ignores the myriad of positive published papers and clinical trials readily available for half a century on PubMed.gov, our National Library of medicine, and other databases.

Change can and must begin with physicians caring more about the welfare of their patients than the prevailing dogma/paradigm and interests of the medical and pharmaceutical industry. Hospitals, like government, must recognize the human “unalienable” Right to Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness, which includes health, wellness and recovery, unhindered by “policy”. Clinical success will bring these therapies into the accepted mainstream, regardless of lack of multibillion-dollar studies effectively bypassing regulatory agency obstruction. Considering the crisis we face, mainstream journals should welcome reports on solutions for these times. But to date, prestigious infectious disease journals have failed to publish manuscripts on these therapies.

Courts must also be made to take cognizance of these fundamental human rights. The New Jersey Supreme Court has recently recognized that the informed consent by patients requires doctors to include disclosure of management that the doctor might not even believe in, and let the patient make his/her own choice [20].

If the profession fails to do this on its own (after obtaining an institutional waiver of liability for offering/providing “unapproved” therapy), sooner or later a savvy attorney may bring down the doctor or institution that fails to place the needs of the patient before “policy”. The institutionalized practice of “condemning to die with no right to try” will then come to a “violent” end. Can medicine rise to avoid this? Can medicine (and science) ever put an end to Semmelweis like sagas?

References
  1. https://www.cdc.gov/drugresistance/biggest-threats.html.
  2. Goodwin JS, Goodwin JM (1984) The tomato effect. Rejection of highly efficacious therapies. JAMA 251: 2387-2390.
  3. Clinical Research Support Center, Office of Regulatory Compliance, University of Colorado (2019) The clinical use of non-FDA-approved drugs and devices.
  4. Rowen R, Robins H, Carew K, Kamara M, Jalloh M (2016) Rapid resolution of hemorrhagic fever (Ebola) in Sierra Leone with ozone therapy. Afr J Infect Dis 10: 49-54.
  5. Rowen RJ (2019) Ozone and oxidation therapies as a solution to the emerging crisis in infectious disease management: A review of current knowledge and experience. Med Gas Res 9: 232-237.
  6. https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/news/media/releases/study_suggests_medical_ errors_now_third_leading_cause_of_death_in_the_us.
  7. https://ethics.harvard.edu/blog/new-prescription-drugs-major-health-risk-few-offsetting-advantages.
  8. Rowen RJ, Robins H (2020) A plausible “Penny” costing effective treatment for corona virus – Ozone therapy. J Infect Dis Epidemiol 6: 113.
  9. Menendez-Cepero S, Marques-Magallanes-Regojo JA, Hernandez-Martinez A, Hidalgo Tallón FJ, Baeza-Noci J (2020) Therapeutic effects of ozone therapy that justifies its use for the treatment of COVID-19. Journal of Neurology and Critical Care 3: 1-6.
  10. Izadi M, Cegolon L, Javanbakht M, Sarafzadeh A, Abolghasemi H, et al. (2020) Ozone therapy for the treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia: A scoping review. Int Immunopharmacol 92: 107307.
  11. Franzini M, Valdenassi L, Ricevuti G, Chirumbolo S, Depfenhart M, et al. (2020) Oxygen-ozone (O2-O3) immunoceutical therapy for patients with COVID-19. Preliminary evidence reported. Int Immunopharmacol 88: 106879.
  12. Wu J, Tan CS, Yu H, Wang Y, Tian Y, et al. (2020) Recovery of four COVID-19 patients via ozonated autohemotherapy. Innovation (N Y) 1: 100060.
  13. Brownstein D (2020) A novel approach to treating COVID-19 using nutritional and oxidative therapies. Science, public health policy, and the law. Clinical and Translational Research 2: 4-22.
  14. Oliver T, Murphy D (1920) Influenzal pneumonia: The intravenous injection of hydrogen peroxide. The Lancet 195: 432-433.
  15. Miley GP, Christensen J (1948) Ultraviolet blood irradiation therapy in acute virus and virus-like infections. Rev Gastroenterol 15: 271-283.
  16. Miley G (1942) X-ray evidence of complete clearing of the lungs within 24-96 hours after a single treatment. American Journal of Bacteriology 45: 303.
  17. Miley G, Christensen JA (1947) Ultraviolet blood irradiation therapy; Further studies in acute infections. Am J Surg 73: 486-493.
  18. Klenner F (1971) Observations on the dose and administration of ascorbic acid when employed beyond the range of a vitamin in human pathology. Journal of Applied Nutrition, 23.
  19. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/cfrsearch.cfm?fr=801.415.
  20. https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/supreme-court/1999/a-9-98-opn.html.
Citation

Rowen RJ (2021) Unholy Interlocking of Government, Corporate, and Medical Dogma Sacrifices Lives – The Semmelweis Saga Resurrected. J Infect Dis Epidemiol 7:199. doi.org/10.23937/2474-3658/1510199

© 2021 Rowen RJ. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

For more articles on COVID by Dr. Rowan:

For my experience using ozonated olive oil topically after MOHS surgery for basal cell carcinoma:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/03/02/dmso-msm-for-lyme-msids/

For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

PTSD, COVID-19 & Lyme Disease: A Perspective

https://danielcameronmd.com/ptsd-covid-19-and-lyme-disease-a-perspective/

PTSD, COVID-19 AND LYME DISEASE: A PERSPECTIVE

man with PTSD and COVID-19 getting console in therapy

“Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a severe mental health condition caused by a terrifying event outside the normal range of usual human experience.”[1] While it is often associated with events such as an assault or disaster, post-traumatic stress disorder can occur in people with severe health problems.

By 

Patients with chronic Lyme disease have reported symptoms of PTSD. Now, an article entitled “PTSD as the second tsunami of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic,” by Dutheil et al. indicates that some COVID-19 patients are experiencing post-traumatic stress disorder, as well.¹

The authors highlight several observations on the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic and PTSD that would also apply to Lyme disease patients that I have seen in my practice.

PTSD in COVID-19 pandemic

  • “With a poor understanding of viruses and spreading mechanisms, the evocation of SARS is generating a great anxiety contributing to promote PTSD.”
  • “In the families of cases, the brutal death of family members involved a spread of fear and a loss of certainty, promoting PTSD.”
  • “PTSD symptoms involve chronic severe anxiety with re-experiencing the traumatic event, flashbacks, nightmares, increased arousal, and reduced social life.”
  • “People suffering from PTSD are prone to not seek care, because of barriers such as lack of information and cost of mental health care, being afraid of stigmatization, or beliefs that symptoms may increase with time.”
  • “PTSD individuals are more at-risk of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and deaths by suicide, in huge proportions.”

PTSD in chronic Lyme disease

  • The poor understanding of Lyme disease and associated tick-borne illnesses has generated a great deal of anxiety.
  • The severity of chronic illness following Lyme disease involves a spread of fear and a loss of certainty.
“People suffering from PTSD are prone to not seek care, because of barriers such as lack of information and cost of mental health care, being afraid of stigmatization, or beliefs that symptoms may increase with time.”
  • I have Lyme disease patients who re-experience the traumatic event, flashbacks, nightmares, increased arousal, and reduced social life, as described by the authors.
  • I have seen Lyme disease patients who “are prone to not seek care, because of barriers such as lack of information and cost of mental health care, being afraid of stigmatization, or beliefs that symptoms may increase with time.”
  • I have seen suicidal ideation in patients I have treated. Dr. Robert Bransfield, a psychiatrist specializing in tick-borne illnesses, has described suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and deaths by suicide in patients in his practice.²

Author’s perspective: I hope that a better understanding of post-traumatic stress disorder in COVID-19 patients will lead to a better understanding of PTSD in Lyme disease.

Related Articles:

Lyme carditis diagnosis during a COVID-19 quarantine

COVID-19 delays diagnosis of Lyme disease

9 ways COVID-19 and Lyme disease can look alike

References:
  1. Dutheil F, Mondillon L, Navel V. PTSD as the second tsunami of the SARS-Cov-2 pandemic. Psychol Med. Apr 24 2020:1-2. doi:10.1017/S0033291720001336
  2. Bransfield RC. Aggressiveness, violence, homicidality, homicide, and Lyme disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:693-713. doi:10.2147/NDT.S155143

______________________

**Comment**

PTSD is very, very real.  I’ve had it myself.  My husband had it. People don’t typically understand that Lyme/MSIDS IS a brain disease and can affect you psychologically in many ways.  You can hear voices, hallucinate, have PTSD or OCD, depression, de-personalization, and so many other mental issues.

It’s important to get to the root of the issue – and that’s treating the infections; however, you may also need to address the mental health aspects as well with a trained professional.  A word of warning; however, I would highly recommend a Lyme literate professional as many patients have been abused at the hands of uneducated professionals who blindly follow the CDC/IDSA ideology.  These people can cause more harm than good.  I would also seek to get a referral from either a knowledgable patient or health professional you know and trust.

For more:

Category:

Lyme, Psychological Aspects, research, Viruses

Study Shows ADE in Those Getting COVID JABS

https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(21)00392-3/fulltext

Infection-enhancing anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies recognize both the original Wuhan/D614G strain and Delta variants. A potential risk for mass vaccination?

Published: August 09, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2021.08.010

Abstract

Antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) of infection is a safety concern for vaccine strategies. In a recent publication, Li et al. (Cell 184 :4203–4219, 2021) have reported that infection-enhancing antibodies directed against the N-terminal domain (NTD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein facilitate virus infection in vitro, but not in vivo. However, this study was performed with the original Wuhan/D614G strain. Since the Covid-19 pandemic is now dominated with Delta variants, we analyzed the interaction of facilitating antibodies with the NTD of these variants.
Using molecular modeling approaches, we show that enhancing antibodies have a higher affinity for Delta variants than for Wuhan/D614G NTDs. We show that enhancing antibodies reinforce the binding of the spike trimer to the host cell membrane by clamping the NTD to lipid raft microdomains. This stabilizing mechanism may facilitate the conformational change that induces the demasking of the receptor binding domain. As the NTD is also targeted by neutralizing antibodies, our data suggest that the balance between neutralizing and facilitating antibodies in vaccinated individuals is in favor of neutralization for the original Wuhan/D614G strain. However, in the case of the Delta variant, neutralizing antibodies have a decreased affinity for the spike protein, whereas facilitating antibodies display a strikingly increased affinity.
Thus, ADE may be a concern for people receiving vaccines based on the original Wuhan strain spike sequence (either mRNA or viral vectors). Under these circumstances, second generation vaccines with spike protein formulations lacking structurally-conserved ADE-related epitopes should be considered.
_____________________
Important points:
  • Antibodies developed from the current COVID injections cause the body to overreact to mutations like Delta, proving ADE.
  • While the author recommends scrapping current jabs with newer ones, can we just admit they are all unnecessary, ineffective, and unsafe?
  • Mutations/variations are a normal, mundane aspect of viral evolution, but experts are stating that mass vaccination campaigns are causing them as they push the virus to mutate to survive.
  • Logic would indicate these vaccination campaigns should be stopped for this very reason, along with the fact these jabs have caused more reports of adverse reactions and death than any other jabs in the history of VAERS, and VAERS typically only captures 1% of reports, so it’s actually far, far worse in reality.
  • Dr. Lee Merrit explains that ALL animals in previous mRNA biologic studies DIED from ADE (antibody dependent enhancement).  Key word:  ALL
  • Natural immunity should be accepted and embraced, as historically it is the only thing that confers lasting immunity.

Category:

research, vaccines, Viruses

COVID Policy is “Completely Stupid” & “Unethical” States France’s Vaccine Policy Chief – Who Was Recently Fired for Stating This

https://www.ukcolumn.org/video/frances-long-time-vaccine-policy-chief-covid-policy-is-completely-stupid-and-unethical  News Video Here as well as written transcript

France’s long-time vaccine policy chief: Covid policy is “completely stupid” and “unethical”

UK Column was recently able to interview top French vaccine expert Professor Christian Perronne on the subject of Covid-19 “vaccines”.

Professor Perronne is Head of the Medical Department at Raymond Poincaré Hospital in Garches, the teaching hospital for the University of Versailles-St Quentin near Paris. He was the University’s Head of Department for Infectious and Tropical Diseases from 1994 onwards, but was fired from that position a few months ago. He is a Fellow of France’s biomedical research centre of world standing, the Institut Pasteur, from which he graduated in bacteriology and virology and where he served as Deputy Director of the National Reference Centre for Tuberculosis and Mycobacteria until 1998.

He has chaired many top-level health committees, including the French Specialist Committee for Communicable Diseases, and the High Council on Public Health (French acronym: HCSP), which advises the government on public health policy and vaccination policy. He is not anti-vaccine and indeed wrote France’s vaccination policy for many years, as well as presiding over the National Consultation Group on Vaccination, also known as the Technical Committee on Vaccination (CTV).

Professor Perronne was also the Vice-President of  the European Advisory Group to the World Health Organisation. At national level in France, he has chaired the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Teaching College (CMIT), the Infectious Diseases Federation (FFI, which he co-founded), the High Council for Public Hygiene (CSHP), and the National Medical and Healthcare products Safety Agency (ANSM, previously AFSSAPS), which evaluates the health risks of medicines and is France’s sole regulator of biomedical research. Until 2013, he sat on the Scientific Council of the French Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research Institute (IMMI/INSERM).

Despite Professor Perronne’s extensive knowledge and experience of communicable diseases, vaccines and vaccine policy at national and governmental level in France, he was quickly censored for speaking out on the subject of Covid-19 vaccines, their claimed efficacy and their identifiable risks. In short, he was professionally sidelined, his reputation was attacked and his professional opinions were censored.

We are therefore delighted to be able to offer this very brave and highly knowledgeable man the opportunity to express his professional opinions and concerns to our audience both in the UK and worldwide, by means of this crucial video interview.

Professor Perronne was joined by Dr Anne-Marie Yim, who kindly facilitated this interview. Anne-Marie is herself highly qualified to speak on vaccines and their effects in the body, having worked as a protein and immune response research expert within the wider pharmaceutical and vaccine industry.

Please share widely

_________________

**Comment**

Dr. Perronne is also a Lyme literate doctor who has spoken out widely in support of treating Lyme patients appropriately a well as the fact these infections are serious but overlooked and denied by many ‘authorities’ and doctors.

It appears that Dr. Perronne, a vaccine proponent, is clashing yet again with ‘the powers that be’ – this time over COVID injections, and due to this was recently fired as Head of the Medical Department at Raymond Poincaré Hospital in Garches.

Highlights:

click

  • these injections contain the sequence of a gene—the first time this has ever been done
  • genetic material is being injected into your body, which is why it should not be labelled a “vaccine”, because that’s deceiving
  • when you inject messenger RNA to produce a huge amount of a spike protein, a fragment of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, you can’t control the process
  • in human cells, RNA might go back to DNA
  • never before has the state or politicians recommended systematic vaccinations for billions of people for a disease whose rate of mortality now is 0.05%
  • the new so-called “Delta variant” from India, and all these variants are less and less virulent
  • it is within the “vaccinated” population that the variants emerge
  • over 90% of cases are in very old people that can be treated
  • hundreds of publications show early treatments work: hydroxychloroquine, azithromycin, ivermectin, zinc, Vitamin D, C, and so on
  •  these gene modifiers are useless 
  • India is a prime example:
    • in states where ivermectin, zinc, Doxycycline and Vitamin D, were used, the epidemic remained at a very low rate and was soon over
    • in the states where they banned these antibiotic and antiviral treatments, but promoted the “vaccine” and Remdesivir (toxic and not efficacious), the epidemic came back, with new cases of mortality 
  • “vaccinated” people should be put in quarantine and isolated as they are dangerous to others. Israel and the UK are perfect examples as severe cases there are among the “vaccinated”
  • unvaccinated people are NOT the dangerous ones
  • variants are not very dangerous and are less and less virulent which is always the case in infectious diseases
  • the epidemic is OVER in many countries worldwide, yet governments are forcing these injections upon their citizens
  • Vietnam is a perfect example as they only had a few dozen deaths in over more than a year until the leaders made injections nearly mandatory, which caused the epidemic to came back with subsequent fatalities
  • these examples prove these injections are not vaccines but actually may facilitate disease and death
  • the WHO’s statement that herd immunity will be achieved when 80% of the population is “vaccinated” is not based on science and should be considered null and void
  • immunologist Dolores Cahill states once you’ve been infected and have recovered you have antibodies FOR LIFE
  • Dr. Bhakdi based on new scientific evidence states:
    • your immune system is your best defense against SARS-CoV-2
    • if you have been infected, even if you experienced no symptoms at all, you are immune to all variants
    • we have already reached herd immunity
    • there is no scientific reason to vaccinate against SARS-CoV-2
    • there is no benefit and the rollout must be stopped
  • we still have no reliable serological tests and most of the tests are “bulls**t”.  They can not correctly identify the numbers of antibodies
  • the scientific community due to conflicts of interest don’t want to develop these tests because it would show Britain, France, Germany, and Spain are now immunized.  There is herd immunity.
  • this is a big problem for pharmacological companies trying to impose “vaccination” policies
  • since the first lockdown in March, doctors are reporting the same things
    • a political protocol was put in place to detect and treat the disease that amounts to total malpractice
    • many doctors received orders to close their practices and were required to work in military centers 48-72 hours where they could not treat patients appropriately
    • seriously ill patients were put in an induced coma to be intubated with oxygen
    • they were forbidden to take heparin, an anti-inflammatory or aspirin, an anticoagulant
    • their lungs failed, systemic inflammation, water in the lung, and inability to breathe led to bacterial infections – often sepsis, and they would die – there was only a 50% chance of recovery
  • if you administer 2 mg hydroxychloroquine in the ICU in an induced coma, you can have heart attack problems resulting in death. That’s what they have been trying to show with the RECOVERY Trial, which Dr. Didlier Raoult has stated it was “the Marx Brothers doing science.” The person in charge of the trial (Professor Landray from Oxford University) used the “usual” dosage for amoebic dysentery, but HCQ is not even the usual treatment for this. He does not understand anything about infectious diseases or anti-infection drugs but led an international trial anyway.
  • ‘Authorities’ stated, “See, hydroxychloroquine doesn’t work! Of course, because you should treat it at an early stage!  The same is true of ibuprofen. In the Recovery Trial, they used 4-5 times the maximum authorized dose. They also modified the evaluation criteria, and doctors could not gain access to the original database. (See FLACCC protocols for every stage of COVID, which are saving lives.)
  • Dr Ochs found that people who have been ‘vaccinated” have a very high level of D-dimers [proteins in blood tests indicating a clotting process], and a lot of physicians have been reporting blood clots forming with AstraZeneca (and other shots)
  • with COVID, there is thrombocytopoenia (low platelets) induced by interactions of E-selectin with Leukocytes which is why Dr. Ochs prescribes vitamin C and ibuprofen to the “vaccinated” who have high D-dimers.  If the disease progresses, clots form in the brain and if too much heparin or aspirin is given to dissolve the clots the patient can have hemorrhaging due to low platelets, so it’s a complex issue.  The same medicine can save or kill depending upon when and how it’s used.
  • regarding Ivermectin, when you have over 80%, sometimes 90% success, you don’t need a placebo.  Even the WHO states that you don’t need a placebo in a crisis situation with non-toxic drugs that work.  There are randomized studies and Ivermectin has been proven to work.
  • to state Ivermectin is toxic is completely stupid
  • the only reason the FDA and other regulatory agencies state these drugs don’t work is due their conflicts of interest and the fact it would nullify their lucrative “vaccines”
  • its a bit ironic that “vaccine” manufacturers have all gotten rid of their placebo groups yet authorities deny effective treatments that did not have placebo groups
  • regarding the fraudulent study published in The Lancet, they said that hydroxychloroquine was “dangerous” or “not effective”, which led to the Minister saying, “Stop hydroxychloroquine!”
  • yet some slides from the intermediate analysis of these two studies leaked out on the Internet showed the only group that had an efficiency of less death was the group using either hydroxychloroquine in the DisCoVeRy study, or hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin in the iCovid study. While not yet statistically significant, the curves showed it was spectacular in reducing death, but the damage was done and the minister never changed his policy and banned HCQ.  
  • these so-called “experts” who are on the TV every day, and have huge conflicts of interest with pharmaceutical companies and are unscientific charlatans, along with the media – should be fired
  • meanwhile, good scientists are publicly discredited
  • The Indian Bar Association is suing the Chief Scientist of the [WHO in India] for the policies which have resulted in more than three million deaths
  • Perronne states he has never seen such severe side-effects from a “vaccine” as has been caused by the COVID shots but that most are not being reported
  • this is the first time in history we are told that “it’s a good ‘vaccine’ but you can still get the disease.”  This is not normal. An efficient vaccine would be protective.  No masks.  Live normally
  • mandating these injections is a scandal and which is resulting in global protests and will probably result in a civil war
  • a Spanish team has been reporting graphene oxide entering the brain, and is causing Guillain-Barré syndrome, and that is eating up the myelin, the coating on the nerves
  • the reality is THE “VACCINE” DOESN’T WORK.  We are surrounded by propaganda
  • there is an electromagnetic field that is engineered, a lipid nanoparticle that is being manufactured by this company called Acuitas Therapeutics of Canada, who are providing it to Pfizer/BioNTech & Moderna.
  • These nanoparticles have three components:
    • phospholipids (a fat), but it also contains
    • ferrous oxide, and 
    • polyethylene glycol. This goes into your brain. It can cross the blood-brain barrier. Normally, it shouldn’t, but it can go and pass into your brain.  And there is also this graphene oxide. Basically, everything about this injection is poisonous: not just messenger RNA and spike protein, which cause inflammation and can be integrated into your DNA, but also the graphene oxide. 
  • There are two types of scientists:
  • All the policies imposed are not scientifically or legally based
  • STOP THE “VACCINATION” CAMPAIGN!
Perronne has written a recent book titled:  “Crypto-infections: Denial, Censorship and Suppression―the Truth About What Lies Behind Chronic Disease”

The accepted message is that humankind has largely conquered infectious disease with a mixture of antibiotics and vaccines, yet it is becoming increasingly clear that chronic hidden or latent infections (crypto-infections) lie behind many of today’s big killers, including heart disease, dementia, and cancer. As an exemplar of how the organisms responsible can hide in plain sight, causing devastation while the medical world is in denial, Borrelia burgdorferi—the bacterium responsible for Lyme disease—has led Dr Perronne to clash with his fellow specialists in infectious disease (ID) and challenge the status quo. From his experience as one of France’s, and the world’s, leading ID specialists, he examines the threats that both Lyme in particular and crypto-infections in general pose and how we can rise to the challenge.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses