Madison Area Lyme Support Group

CDC Confirms 100% COVID Shot Deaths Caused by Just 5% of Batches Located in Red States

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/bad-pfizer-vaccine-batches-accoun

Bad Pfizer Vaccine Batches Account for 4.2% of doses but 71% of Serious Adverse Events

Explains Why Some Have Severe Side Effects and Others Do Not

By Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH

April 13, 2023

I am routinely asked: why are so many people who took the COVID-19 vaccines apparently fine while others are suffering heart damage, strokes, blood clots and are ending up disabled or dead? It has been suspected for many months that there may be variations in vaccine lots or batches that could partially explain these observations. In other words, not everyone is getting the same dose of mRNA.

Under Emergency Use Authorization, the vaccine companies and their subcontractors do not have any inspections of the final filled and finished vials. This is unprecedented for a widely used product of any type. It is possible that lipid nanoparticles aggregate in suspension and so some batches may contain more mRNA than others. Likewise, since lot size has varied over time, it is possible that contaminants from the manufacturing process may be concentrated in some smaller lots compared to larger ones. Finally, there may be product transport, storage, and use factors that denature mRNA including heating, air injected into vials, and multiple needles dipped into the suspension. (See link for article)

______________

SUMMARY:

• Japan returned millions of doses due to contamination
• Metallic beads are used by biodefense contractors which may explain the bizarre magnetism at the injection site
• A report from Schmeling and coworkers inspecting the Pfizer shot found:
  • 71% of serious adverse events came from 4.2% of doses (high risk batches)
  • conversely <1% of these events came from 32.1% of doses (low risk batches)
  • The variation explained for the high and moderate risk batches was 78 and 89%, respectively
  • Thus as more doses were given out of those vials, the greater the number of side effects were reported. This means that the majority of risk is in the shot and not the person who received it
  • This proves the COVID shot debacle is a product problem and not a patient problem
  • This also proves that lack of product inspection has led to untold suffering

https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/cdc-confirms-100-of-reported-covid

Efficacy of COVID Boosters Against Severe Illness & Death is a Wishful Myth

https://www.jpands.org/vol28no1/ophir.pdf

The Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccine Boosters against Severe Illness and Deaths: Scientific Fact or Wishful Myth?

Yaakov Ophir, Ph.D. Yaffa Shir-Raz, Ph.D. Shay Zakov, Ph.D. Peter A. McCullough, M.D., M.P.H.

ABSTRACT

The medical narrative justifying the global vaccination campaign has changed throughout the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis. While the primary narrative focused on the proclaimed excellent ability of the novel mRNA vaccines to prevent infections and (therefore) to attenuate the spread of the pandemic, policymakers today (March 2023) acknowledge the poor vaccine efficacy (VE) of contemporary booster doses against infections but insist that the boosters are still capable of providing long-term protection against severe illness and deaths (as if the two types of protection do not depend on each other). We examine the evidence behind this modified narrative through an in-depth evaluation of representative and high-profile data from: (1) the formal, phase 3 clinical trials by Pfizer and Moderna, which preceded the FDA’s emergency use authorization (EUA); (2) the observational studies from Israel (“the world’s lab,” as termed by Pfizer officials), which examined the efficacy of the fourth dose at about the time the FDA authorized this second booster; and (3) the publicly available, real-life dashboards of pandemic statistics.

This investigation encountered multiple methodological and representational constraints, including short, and sometimes arbitrary or uneven follow-up periods; uneven exclusion criteria and COVID-19 testing levels; selection biases; and selective report of results. But most importantly, the documented, conditional probability of death and severe illness (i.e., the percentage of severe illness and death cases among those infected with the virus) did not differ between the treatment and the control groups of the various clinical and observational efficacy studies. Altogether, the representative data examined in this article do not lend convincing support to the notion that the current booster doses offer protection against severe illness and deaths that extends significantly beyond their temporary and fragile protection against infections. Considering the already known poor efficacy against infections and transmission and the ever-growing concerns over serious, vaccine-associated adverse outcomes, the findings of this meticulous scientific investigation challenge the current (modified) narrative and serve as an urgent call for the medical community to reconsider the balance between the benefits and the risks of the newly developed COVID-19 vaccines. (See link for entire study)

_________________

**Comment**

Efficacy has been dealt with by experts many, many times over; however, the bought out media is simply not reporting on the way ‘the powers that be’ have manipulated, skewed, hidden, and outright lied about data.  It’s also important to remember that similarly to Lyme/MSIDS, the entire house of cards is built on false premises including:

• they have never, to this day, created a successful”vaccine” for an upper respiratory disease
• a “vaccine” isn’t needed for an illness which has a 99.991% recovery rate by doing nothing
• the entire house of cards is based upon flawed testing making everything COVID when it could simply be the flu
• this article points out that these injections lack a viable mechanism of action against COVID in the airways and that antibodies cannot prevent injection due to the fact COVID invades through the respiratory tract and that none of the “vaccine” trials gave any evidence that they prevent transmission.  Urging people to get these fast-tracked gene therapy injections to “protect others” has NO basis in fact
• Despite forcing countries to put up sovereign assets including their bank reserves, military bases, and embassy buildings as collateral, these “vaccine” manufacturers ADMIT efficacy and risks are UNKNOWN
• when absolute risk is taken into account, these injections are less than 1% effective
• COVID “vaccine” manufacturers have unblinded their trials giving control groups the actual “vaccine,” making long-term efficacy and safety impossible to assess
• Every clinical study and non-peer reviewed press release regarding efficacy needs to be revisited due to the sleight-of-statistical hand and the faulty PCR used in these studies.  Please remember that the CDC did not consider people “vaccinated” until up to five weeks after the initial dose – demonstrating brazen statistical manipulation to bury perception of adverse events and deaths
• CDC data has shown that mass “vaccination” has had NO measurable impact on COVID mortality.
• Thanks to a federal court order, the FDA has confirmed graphene is in the COVID shots. Spanish researchers have found that graphene makes up more than 99% of the injection
• German researchers have found each and every vial to be contaminated with toxic ingredients
• The COVID gene therapy injections have caused more reports of adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS

For more:

• https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccine-efficacy-narrative
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZbTwoTMBB6Q&t=246s  The efficacy devil hides in the little scientific details, so I urge you to read the entire article and judge the evidence for yourself. However, this video by one of the study authors discusses the findings in this video. 
• https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2022/04/06/covid-vaccines-dont-prevent-transmission-severe-illness-or-deaths-data-show-70-of-vaxxed-cdc-employees-got-covid/

Pfizer May Be Taken to Court, The French Suffering Cardiac Events, But Biden Still Signs $5 Billion Deal With Big Pharma For More Shots

https://theprint.in/world/british-indian-medic-backs-legal-review-of-covid-vaccine-in-south-africa-high-court

Mistakes Were Not Made: “Don’t Let Them Get Away With It”

http://  Approx. 4 Min

Mistakes Were NOT Made: An Anthem for Justice (Video)

FDA Director Issues Shocking Threat If You Don’t Take New Injection

http://  Approx. 8 Min

FDA Director Issues Shocking Threat if You Don’t Take New Injection

4/10/23

Dr. Suneel Dhand discusses FDA Director Dr. Peter Mark’s statement that while “vaccine” mandates are not the way to go, the shot is for those who “want to save their lives,” insinuating that those who don’t take the jab don’t want to save their lives.  Dhand states that this shockingly absurd statement is indicative of the past years with COVID.  Marks freely admits that despite attempting for 10 years to produce a “vaccine” to prevent the flu, it hasn’t happened yet, and he doesn’t expect the next for COVID shot to be “too different” from what’s currently available.

• The FDA is supposed to be a regulatory agency and has no business pushing medical therapeutics and formulating policy

• The FDA has no evidence to support the assertion that the COVID injections will reduce hospitalization or save your life

• This typifies the sheer arrogance of our public health ‘authorities’ and reveals they have learned nothing from COVID

• Rather than simply reflecting upon their own mismanagement of COVID for the erosion in confidence for both public health and “vaccines,”  they will continue to blame others for ‘misinformation’

• There are 88 bills in state legislatures to roll back or outlaw any sort of “vaccine” mandate.  Public health “vaccine” pushers simply can not fathom this and continue to falsely state that there are too many people dying of COVID – again insinuating that the COVID injections somehow stop this, which they don’t

• Interestingly, Penny Heaton, MD, Global Therapeutic Area Head for Vaccines at J&J, is interested in moving beyond lipid nanoparticles that may be “potentially less reactogenic, potentially more immunogenic, potentially actually direct[ing] the exact immune response we want.”  This statement admits the COVID shots are reactogenic, not immunogenic, and are not giving the correct immune response.