British Indian medic backs legal review of COVID vaccine in South Africa High Court
London, Mar 29 (PTI) Leading UK-based Indian-origin consultant cardiologist Aseem Malhotra is among a group of international experts backing an approach to the High Court of South Africa, calling for an urgent judicial review of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID vaccine products which he fears may be “harmful”.
Lawyers representing the human rights group Freedom Alliance of South Africa (FASA) say the show cause notice was filed on Monday at the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Pretoria, along with real-world data analysis, which is claimed to show an association with increasing death from both COVID and non-COVID causes in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.
FASA has approached the court to review and set aside the authorization of Pfizer’s vaccine products on the basis that the authorization was “unlawful”.
If successful, this could result in the removal of COVID mRNA vaccines from the South African market and also have global implications.
(See link for article)
Here’s Malhotra’s tweet on the statement.
- Malhotra states that the literature and the trial data shows unequivocally that for the majority of people, the Pfizer shot is more harmful than beneficial and should never have even been approved.
- Malhotra states the injections should be halted pending a full investigation.
- Dr Herman Edeling, neurosurgeon with over 40 years of experience, notes that the mRNA “vaccine” administered as Comirnaty in South Africa should “never have been branded as ‘safe’ and ‘effective’”.
- The application calls on Pfizer to explain their conduct and calls on regulators and government to hold Pfizer accountable.
- FASA hopes to announce a date of hearing soon.
- Pfizer is predictably silent.
Hundreds of French Citizens Suffer Cardiac Events after Bivalent Boosters
30 Day Regulatory Window Captures Heart Attacks, Strokes, and Blood Clots
I have served on or chaired two dozen data safety monitoring boards for randomized trials of novel experimental drugs or devices. I can tell you first hand that for COVID-19 vaccines, a 30 day regulatory window after injection is fair game for attribution of health events to the product when the adverse events of interest are known to be caused by the mRNA induced Wuhan Spike protein.
Jabagi et al, NEJM, reported from the French National Health Data System linked to the national COVID-19 vaccination database disclosing cardiovascular events after mRNA BA4/BA5 bivalent boosters. All persons who were 50 years of age or older and who had received a booster dose between October 6 and November 9, 2022, were included in the study. The composite of ischemic/hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary occurred in 335 unfortunate individuals. The authors make the mistake of dividing by the cases by the entire number vaccinated and comparing rates to monovalent boosters. Neither of these operations are valid since there is incomplete capture of events and comparison was not made to a placebo or control group.
(See link for article)
Both Malhotra and McCullough are cardiologists. It would behoove us to listen closely.
Despite these frightening developments (among many others) the Biden Admin just announced a $5 Billion public-private partnership on Next Gen COVID “vaccines,” even though Biden just signed a bill formally ending the COVID emergency.
http:// Approx. 8 Min
$5Billion Big Pharma Partnership
I’m sure they’ll get it right this time…..