Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Update for Wisconsin AB 299 & AB 316: Action Needed

Wisconsinites, please act today and ask Governor Evers to sign both AB 299 & AB 316

AB 299 has passed both the State Assembly and the Senate. If enacted, it would prohibit governmental entities and persons/entities doing business in Wisconsin from requiring individuals to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of receiving services, transacting business, accessing facilities, or participating in nonprivate functions. Essentially, this bill is a COVID-19 vaccine passport ban. 

AB 316 has also passed both legislative chambers. If enacted, it would prohibit governmental entities in Wisconsin from discriminating against individuals based on their COVID-19 vaccination status or whether they have proof of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine.

ACTION NEEDED:

1) Contact Governor Evers’ Office and ask him to sign AB 299 and AB 316! Please see talking points below to use when contacting him.

Email: Click here to submit a comment to Governor Evers online.

Phone: Call his Madison office at 606-266-1212 and his Milwaukee office at 414-227-4344.

Mail: P.O. Box 7863 Madison, WI 53707

2) Please share this email with family and friends, or you can tell them to go to http://NVICAdvocacy.org and click on the alert for these bills.

3) Login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal OFTEN to check for updates.   http://NVICAdvocacy.org. We review bills and make updates daily. Bills can change many times over the legislative process and your timely visits, calls, and emails directed at the correct legislators are critical to this process.

TALKING POINTS (Please personalize to share how this bill affects you and your family):

AB 299:

  • AB 299 prohibits state and local governmental entities, as well as individuals or entities doing business in Wisconsin, from requiring individuals to show proof of COVID-19 vaccination as a condition of access, receiving services, or participating in business or functions.
  • This bill serves as an effective COVID-19 vaccine passport ban, and would allow Wisconsin citizens to move about freely in society, regardless of their COVID-19 vaccination status.
  • COVID-19 vaccine passport systems come with serious privacy concerns.
  • Allowing COVID-19 vaccine requirements as a condition of service or access causes segregation, and potentially cuts individuals off from resources and services they need – such  groceries or healthcare – simply because they have not received a vaccine that is the subject of such a requirement.
  • This discrimination can even be life threatening. Some individuals have been turned down from life-saving organ transplant surgeries because they were not vaccinated against COVID-19.
  • More and more states and cities are beginning to rollback their COVID-19 restrictions, including proof of vaccine policies. Even the mayor of Washington DC announced she would end the city’s COVID-19 vaccine requirement for businesses.
  • Multiple states have prohibited vaccine passports including Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota, Oklahoma (for students), South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas, Utah (government ban only), and Wyoming. Wisconsin should too.

AB 316:

  • AB 316 would prohibit discrimination based on COVID-19 vaccination status by the state and other governmental entities in Wisconsin.
  • Any form of discrimination against individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 is essentially a form of coercion to try and get them vaccinated by implementing barriers to navigate life.
  • It is unreasonable to penalize perfectly healthy individuals who simply have not received a particular vaccine.
  • This bill would prohibit government-sponsored COVID-19 vaccine discrimination, allowing residents of Wisconsin to freely participate with their state and local governments.
  • It would also ensure that the residents of Wisconsin are allowed to access needed state and local government facilities and services without fear of discrimination based on their COVID-19 vaccination status.
  • State and local governments are taxpayer-funded and exist to serve the public. Since there is no vaccine requirement for paying taxes, there should be no chance of a vaccine requirement for accessing or using government facilities and services, or as a prerequisite for any other type of interaction with the government.
  • Passing this bill would also clarify that there is no state requirement or expectation of private persons and entities in Wisconsin to mandate COVID-19 vaccines or to require proof of vaccination.
  • Even individuals who are vaccinated against COVID-19 can still spread and catch it. COVID-19 vaccine requirements or mandates reduce the focus from health to mere vaccine status.
  • Our American system of government was founded upon protecting the rights of individuals. This protection entails prohibiting the intrusion upon these rights from other individuals and entities, including the government itself.

Sincerely,

NVIC Advocacy Team

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Fauci Braces for House GOP Investigations

https://www.theepochtimes.com/fauci-braces-for-house-gop-investigations-benghazi-hearings-all-over-again

Dr. Anthony Fauci, White House Chief Medical Adviser and Director of the NIAID, shows a screen grab of a campaign website for Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) while answering questions at a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on Jan. 11, 2022. (Greg Nash-Pool/Getty Images)
Dr. Anthony Fauci, White House Chief Medical Adviser and Director of the NIAID, shows a screen grab of a campaign website for Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) while answering questions at a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee hearing on Capitol Hill on Jan. 11, 2022. (Greg Nash-Pool/Getty Images)
Congress

Fauci Braces for House GOP Investigations: ‘Benghazi Hearings All Over Again’

By Jack Phillips
March 16, 2022

White House COVID-19 adviser Dr. Anthony Fauci said he expects to be investigated by Republicans if they take back control of the House during the 2022 midterm elections.

“It’s Benghazi hearings all over again,” Fauci told The Washington Post on March 15 in reference to numerous GOP lawmakers saying they will look into alleged gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China, located near where the first COVID-19 cases were officially reported in late 2019.

Fauci, an unelected federal official who has headed the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) since 1984, claimed that potential hearings “will distract me from doing my job, the way it’s doing right now.” Should there be hearings and an investigation, Fauci said, “there will be nothing there.”  (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

Ironic he mentions Benghazi. 

A 48-page supplementary report on it says:

“What we did find was a tragic failure of leadership – in the run-up to the attack and the night of – and an administration that, so blinded by politics and its desire to win an election, disregarded a basic duty of government: tell the people the truth. And for those reasons Benghazi is, and always will be, an American tragedy.”

Jordan, from Ohio, and Pompeo, from Kansas, were equally blunt in their condemnation of Clinton in particular.

“Secretary Clinton and the administration told one story privately – that Benghazi was a terrorist attack – and told another story publicly – blaming a video-inspired protest,” they wrote.

And never forget that the investigations indirectly led to the private email scandal.

Fauci, seems to be closer to truth than even he realizes.

Similarly to Benghazi, COVID has been labeled a tragic failure of leadership driven by politics.  And Fauci has said one thing only to state just the opposite so many times it’s become the norm.  Political motives have been proven due to the glaring fact that effective, cheap treatments for COVID have been completely squashed, ignored, and banned with ‘authorities’ myopically pushing COVID injections that:

Even CDC’s Walensky has belatedly come forth admitting the myopic focus on COVID shots as a ‘cure all’ was short-sighted, but her suspiciously timed statement occurs right before mid-term elections. Unfortunately, her admission is too little too late for those dead or maimed, as well as the fact the “vaccine” only narrative has caused a new form of segregation and division that are still alive & well.

Comparing Fauci’s potential investigation to Benghazi has some merit after all.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Comparisons Between the Lyme Disease & COVID Epidemics

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5QrCiJulL1Cm/  Video Here  (Approx. 1 hour 20 min)

Comparisons Between the Lyme disease and COVID Epidemics

3/2/22

Homepage: https://anomicage.com/

Jerry Leonard discusses Lyme Disease, bioweapons, and the connections to eugenics. He also delves into the manifestations of these tactics in our current global psychological and biological warfare operation.

A root of the problem is lucrative “vaccine” development by our public health ‘authorities’ who own patents on the organisms, tests, vaccines, and treatments, and pull in millions from licensing deals and technologies.

Most frightening of all is the creation of a new NIH which will merge national security with health security modeled after DARPA.  (Hopefully you can see where this is going, if not, read this).

  • Universities are involved in an unholy alliance with Big Pharma, the government, and mainstream media as they receive royalties (disingenuously classified as “federal compensation” rather than “outside income”) when they market patented technologies, yet taxpayers continue paying universities for research.
  • Many NIH scientists routinely fail to disclose royalty payments – one of whom is Fauci, the highest paid federal employee.
  • Researchers in academia obtain money from the government.  Dr. Fauci, holds the keys to the coffer.  Hopefully by now it is evident to all that he is one of the most corrupt individuals on the planet and he will do whatever it takes to get what he wants – lie, cover up, deny, and hide.  He is not only behind the COVID debacle, but the Lyme debacle as well. 

Until we demand transparency and for public health to be devoid of ties to Big Pharma, Big Tech, the media, and research institutions we will never get the truth.

COVID has brought much of this dirt into the light; however, it’s been going on for decades.  Lyme/MSIDS patients and the doctors who dare treat them have had to walk this pot-holed riddle path and deal with the censorship, denial, and bullying.

Patients have suffered unbelievable abuse by the medical profession and our government. Efforts have been made to no effect and the truth remains elusive, leaving us only to conclude our government has much to hide.

I also wrote an article back in 2020 on the playbook of public health ‘authorities.’  I followed this up with another article explaining how these ‘authorities’ blackball treatments that compete with their own lucrative treatments.

Unfortunately, many Lyme patients and advocacy groups continue to work with the very same corrupt individuals and organizations. That’s essentially asking the pot to call the kettle black.  It just isn’t gonna happen.  I’ve said this before, but it’s worth repeating: the only forward progress made in Lymeland is by independent researchers who do not vie for government grants.

If you are new to the Lyme war, please see:

Lyme/MSIDS is a politically incorrect disease and patients have everything stacked against them.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Lyme, vaccines, Viruses

Pfizer CEO Predictably States 4th Booster Necessary & Annual “Revaccinations” Are the Ultimate Goal, But Whistleblower States “I’m 100% Convinced it’s Fraud”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/pfizer-ceo-fourth-covid-19-vaccine-dose-neccessary

Pfizer CEO: Fourth COVID-19 Vaccine Dose Necessary

By Jack Phillips
March 13, 2022 Updated: March 13, 2022

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said on March 13 that a fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine would be necessary, claiming it would continue to reduce hospitalizations.

“Clearly, we are not where we would all like to be, which is [where] COVID is behind us,” Bourla told CBS News. “I think that right now, we have very significant tools in our hands so that we can go gradually, I think, back to our normal lives. But we need to understand that the COVID will not go away in the years to come.”

Saying Americans would have to figure out “how to live” with the virus, Bourla then claimed it was likely people would have to get yearly COVID-19 boosters.  (See link for article)

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • Bourla admits COVID shot protection doesn’t last long.
  • He provides no evidence or data for any claims of COVID shot efficacy.
  • He doesn’t mention natural immunity at all.
  • He doesn’t discuss mandates or passport systems in light of the fact the shots don’t work.
  • Pfizer has profited significantly ($37 billion in the last year)
  • This hums right along with what an FDA exec said:  Biden’s plan to inject as many as possible.
  • The FDA exec also said: “Almost a billion a year is going into the FDA’s budget from the people we regulate.”
  • It was also just discovered that HHS has paid the media $1 BILLION to promote COVID shots. This explains the montage of media outlets stating the exact same things.   What’s “extremely dangerous to our democracy” is news outlets stating the exact same things and being paid by Big Pharma and the government.

___________________

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/pfizer-ceo-backpedals-claims-pressured-into-producing-counterintuitive-mrna-injections/

Pfizer CEO Backpedals, Claims Pressured Into Producing ‘Counterintuitive’ mRNA Injections

March 13, 2022

by Infowars.com

Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla tried distancing himself from the COVID mRNA vaccines on Friday, suggesting he only developed the “counterintuitive” technology under pressure from colleagues.

In a Washington Post Live special titled, “Moonshot: Inside Pfizer’s Nine-Month Race to Make the Impossible Possible”, host Jonathon Capehart asked Bourla on Thursday why Pfizer decided to pursue experimental mRNA vaccines despite the nascency of the developing technology.

“When you and your colleague were trying to decide which route to go down: the traditional vaccine route or the mRNA route. You write that it was ‘most counterintuitive’ to go the mRNA route. And yet, you went that route. Explain why,” Capehart said.

Bourla explained the mRNA decision “was counterintuitive because Pfizer was mastering- or let’s say we had very good experience and expertise with multiple technologies that could give a vaccine, and the Novartis that some of the vaccines are, we were very good in doing that. Protein vaccines, we were very good in doing that and plus many other technologies.”

“mRNA was a technology, but we had less experience, only two years working on this, and actually, mRNA was a technology that never delivered a single product until that day, not vaccine, not any other medicine,” Bourla admitted.

“So it was very counterintuitive, and I was surprised when they suggested to me that this is the way to go, and I questioned it,” he continued. “And I asked them to justify how can you say something like that, but they came, and they were very, very convinced that this is the right way to go.”

“They felt that the two years of work on mRNA since 2018 together with BioNTech to develop the flu vaccine made them believe that the technology is mature and we are at the cusp of delivering a product.”

“So they convinced me. I followed my instinct that they know what they are saying. They are very good, and we made this very difficult decision at that time,” he added.

Bourla also admitted that despite pushing the “more risky” mRNA technology on the public, Pfizer felt it had “all the features required” to combat the COVID pandemic.

CAPEHART: And is it‑‑the thing about mRNA is that because it’s synthetic, it reduces the amount of time? It makes it a lot easier to readjust, reedit, refit to whatever virus you’re trying to make a vaccine for or trying to address?

BOURLA: You’re absolutely right. This is one of the many benefits that the technology brings. So the reason why they were suggesting something that was more risky clearly than the others was because of the many benefits if we were successful. We analyzed very well and knew that we are in a pandemic. And it is eventually possible that we will now see many new variants coming up. So we wanted to have a technology that if there is a need to adopt to the vaccine, we’ll be able to do it very quickly, and mRNA can do in weeks what other technologies require months.

And the second thing is that we wanted to be able to use a technology that will not limit abilities to boost immune responses with additional injections if there is a need, and mRNA is very good in that. Unlike, for example, adenoviruses, there are issues when you try to do a second or third dose. That creates issues.

So, for this and many other reasons, we selected to go with something that was clearly more risky, but if we were successful, it looked like it has all the features that are required to fight a pandemic in an expedient manner and in a mass scale.

Instead of taking credit for developing the mRNA technology, Bourla appears to be distancing himself from the decision to pursue mRNA vaccines, instead foisting responsibility to his “colleagues.”

Bourla then also suggested the vaccine was rendered ineffective due to the mild Omicron variant, and said that “annual revaccinations” is the “ultimate goal.”

“I felt and I had expressed that conviction that with a third shot, we should be able to get immune protection that will last for a year, and then we should be able to move to annual revaccinations, which is the ultimate goal,” Bourla said.

Notably, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Division President Stefan Oelrich admitted during the World Health Summit last November that a global pandemic was necessary to convince the world’s population to submit themselves to experimental mRNA technology injections.

“I always like to say: if we had surveyed two years ago in the public – ‘would you be willing to take a gene or cell therapy and inject it into your body?’ – we probably would have had a 95% refusal rate,” Oelrich confessed, adding, “I think this pandemic has opened many people’s eyes to innovation.”

Read the full article at Infowars.com.

________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/pfizer-fda-data-clinical-trials-blackrock-advisor  Video Here (Approx. 1 Hour)

Pfizer, FDA Hid Data Showing Clinical Trials Failed, Says Former BlackRock Advisor

In an interview with Naomi Wolf, former BlackRock investment advisor Edward Dowd explained why Wall Street lost faith in Pfizer and Moderna stocks when Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration tried to hide clinical trial data.
In an interview with Naomi Wolf, of the Daily Clout, investment advisor Edward Dowd discussed why investors are dumping COVID-19 vaccine makers’ stocks.

In an interview with Naomi Wolf, of the Daily Clout, investment advisor Edward Dowd discussed why investors are dumping COVID-19 vaccine makers’ stocks.

Dowd, a former managing director with BlackRock from 2002 to 2012, grew BlackRock’s growth strategy from $2 billion-$14 billion over 10 years.

Wolf introduced Dowd:

“He’s the extraordinarily kind of courageous, well-informed whistleblower who has come forward to explain to audiences why in his view, Pfizer has committed a fraud.”

Dowd described how his initial caution about taking the experimental COVID vaccine led him to research data related to Pfizer’s clinical trials.

Dowd told Wolf:

“I learned from a friend in the biotech industry that Pfizer had failed its all-cause mortality endpoint in the initial trial … All-cause mortality is the gold standard in any drug trial at the FDA. When you fail that endpoint, the drug is not approved.”

When Big Pharma and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were unwilling to release vaccine safety data, Dowd grew even more skeptical about the vaccines, he said, and was compelled to speak out privately and publicly about what he believed was a major deception:

“I got more loud about fraud when the FDA decided to hide the clinical data for 75 years. I’m an investor, so let me just say how I think about the world. I don’t wait for people to tell me what just happened. My job was to come up with an analysis, mosaic and investment thesis, and then over time I’d be proven right.

“So I don’t wait for The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal or The Washington Post to tell me anything. Because by the time that happens, the opportunity to make money is lost. So I started screaming fraud as soon as I saw that — because it’s unprecedented to hide data from the public.”

It was a report from the CEO of a major life insurance company that confirmed Dowd’s doubts:

“If this vaccine was as deadly and injurious as we thought, we’d see the insurance companies and the funeral home results. These are databases that aren’t being hidden from us by the government. So, unfortunately, in early January, a signal was launched by One America.

“The CEO didn’t really know what he was saying or the implications of it — because he didn’t think it was the vaccine, but he got on a Chamber of Commerce call in Indiana, and he said that in the second half of 2021, he was seeing a 40% increase in all-cause mortality —  non-COVID. And to put some meat on those bones, a 10% increase he said would be a three-standard deviation [increase], which in math in my world is a big deal.”

Dowd described the impact on the financial world and on his current work:

“Wall Street is listening to me now because they’re nervous and a lot of them are jabbed as well. And if you look at the stocks of Moderna and Pfizer, Moderna is down 70% and Pfizer is down 20 plus percent.

“So my goal has been to raise consciousness across the country and the globe, by pointing out that even though the mainstream media is not going to save us — and it doesn’t seem like the politicians or the regulators are, because they’re in on it — we have to spread the word.”

Wolf asked Dowd about the repercussions of his public position:

“One of the things you’ve said, unequivocally, not mincing words — this is fraud. So if you are not right, that’s actionable, I believe, and Pfizer and Moderna could come at you with a libel suit or a slander suit. But I believe that has not happened yet. Will you speak to that?”

Dowd replied:

“I don’t have a medical license to take away. I don’t have a bar license to take away. I’m an investor. And throughout the history of Wall Street, investors have what we call a thesis. So I present this as a thesis — I’m a hundred percent convinced it’s fraud. I’ve laid out my case and it’s starting to appear, it’s coming to light that it is, but I can say this is freedom of speech. They can sue me if they want. I don’t suspect they will.”

Dowd said he’s been waiting for a “hit piece on me,” but there haven’t been any yet. He said because what he’s presenting is an investment thesis, he’s protected under free speech laws.

“Here’s the problem, Dowd said. “The proof of the fraud is showing up in real-life results. And that is becoming undeniable and impossible to hide.”

© [3/14/22] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Children in China Diagnosed with Leukemia After Taking COVID Shots

https://www.theepochtimes.com/children-in-china-contract-leukemia-after-taking-chinese-vaccines

Children in China Diagnosed With Leukemia After Taking Chinese Vaccines

By Eva Fu
March 11, 2022 Updated: March 13, 2022

After receiving her first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, Li Jun’s 4-year-old developed a fever and coughs, which quickly subsided after intravenous therapy at the hospital. But after the second shot, the father could tell something was wrong.

Swelling appeared around his daughter’s eyes and did not go away. For weeks, the girl complained about pains on her legs, where bruises started to emerge seemingly out of nowhere. In January, a few weeks after the second dose, the 4-year-old was diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

“My baby was perfectly healthy before the vaccine dose,” Li (an alias), from China’s north-central Gansu Province, told The Epoch Times. “I took her for a health check. Everything was normal.”

He is among hundreds of Chinese that belong to a social media group claiming to be suffering from or have a household member suffering from leukemia, developed after taking Chinese vaccines. Eight of them confirmed the situation when reached by The Epoch Times. Names of the interviewees have been withheld to protect their safety. (See link for article)

___________________

Important quote:

“Our doctor from the hospital told us that since November, the children coming to their hematology division to treat leukemia have doubled the previous years’ number and they are having a shortage of beds,” he said.

Similarly to censorship in the U.S., these parents are ignored and bullied. The police showed up, fabricated things, and ordered the parents to withdraw from the chat group, and the details of over 200 leukemia patients, filled out by group members, is no longer accessible.

For more: https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/  VAERS data and mounting list of adverse reactions and deaths.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses