Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

TN House Health Subcommittee Hearing on Natural Immunity, Ivermectin, Patient Rights, and Rights to Prescribe and Fill

https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/tn-health-subcommittee-hearing  Video Here

03/01/22 – 12:00 pm

TN – House Health Subcommittee Hearing

The Tennessee sub-committee on Health are hearing bills about natural immunity, ivermectin, patients rights, and doctor-pharmacists rights to prescribe and fill.

Dr. Paul Marik, Dr. Pierre Kory, Dr. Ryan Cole, Dr. Richard Urso, and Dr. John Littell will be giving testimony to the bills.  Go to top link for videos.  (Only Cole and Urso speak in this particular video)

Image links to WWDNYK Studios page of FB where this is shadowbanned. If you’re on FB, please share across groups on the medium – and elsewhere.

The first video doesn’t start until 7:45, and the actual speakers don’t begin until 41:00. Each speaker has 3 minutes.  This is imperative information to know and educate other on.  Please listen!

  • Dr. Ryan Cole starts first with natural immunity. If you had COVID, you are recovered.  No vaccine needed.  There is no emergency any more.  We need to lift all mandates immediately.
  • Dr. Richard Urso then speaks at 45:00.  COVID “vaccine” manufacturers went out of their way to omit those with natural immunity.  The reason: those who have recovered from COVID are at risk for a hyperimmune response after “vaccination,” and some WILL DIE.  Big Pharma didn’t want that fact to be exposed so they eliminated the potential entirely.
    • Research from Israel show the double “vaxxed” are 27 times more likely to get reinfected with COVID
    • data from other countries show that the triple “vaxxed” are more likely to DIE
    • CDC data shows:
      • cases and hospitalizations increased 1,000% in the “vaxxed” following Omicron
      • Cases skyrocketed 2,400% in the boosted
      • Hospitalizations also increased in the “vaxxed” from 1.4 per 100,000 to 35.2 per 100,000
      • COVID deaths also increased in the “vaxxed”
      • While there was also a jump in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths in the unvaccinated, the increase wasn’t as significant compared to the “vaxxed”
    • natural immunity is long, broad, and durable – 18 years later, those with SARS-Cov1 still had immunity.  Immunity is likely life-long
    • The “vaccinated” are producing more spike protein than those with natural immunity
    • A UK study on high risk children age 10-14 showed they were 52 times more likely to die if “vaccinated”, compared to infection from COVID
  • There is an excellent question and answer section where many issues are discussed and cleared up

For those who are still pro-COVID injections, and believe they somehow help at all, the most clarifying discussion happens at 1:12:08 when a representative, who is also a doctor, asks specifically about the “effectiveness” of the COVID injections, and the fact he has a problem entertaining the idea that they weren’t helpful at all.  The responses:

  • Dr. Cole states that whatever small benefit (0.345%) the injections had early on during the middle of an epidemic with a fast-moving virus is completely diminished by the fact natural immunity and early treatments, that are far more effective than “vaccines”, were completely neglected and suppressed
  • The VAERS data base shows that death and adverse reactions are the highest for COVID shots than for any other vaccine in the history of VAERS
  • Experimental models are showing COVID mRNA injections go into liver cells and reverse transcription is occurring
  • Adverse reactions appear to be dose related.  In other words, the more jabs, the more reactions
  • While we can all optimize our health and immune systems, once you get the injection, it appears it becomes a part of your genome and is with you forever
  • COVID injections are gene therapies.

Category:

vaccines, Viruses

Pfizer “Vaccine” Flops….Increased COVID in Young Kids Following “Vaccination”

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/pfizer-vaccine-flops-increased-covid?

Pfizer Vaccine Flops… Increased COVID-19 in Young Kids Following COVID-19 Vaccination

Pfizer’s vaccine in children 5 to 11 elicits antibodies (yawn) but only 11% efficacy one month after kids were “fully vaccinated”. After one month, vaxxed kids are MORE likely to have a COVID-19.

In a non-peer-reviewed report (par for the lame course), researchers report that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine has only 11% “vaccine effectiveness” in kids 5 to 11 in prevented COVID-19 diagnoses one month following vaccination with two doses.

The report is light on details of how COVID-19 diagnoses were determined, reporting only that they used “NAAT” or “antigen results” reported to the New York State Electronic Clinical Laboratory Reporting System (ECLRS).

The report does not provide any data on the number of cases that occurred in the ‘vaccinating’; i.e., those people who received a single dose but for various reasons were not jabbed with the second dose.

When the data are broken into ages of single years, it’s clear that the vaccine is not only a total flop for the younger age groups: if they keep tracking these kids, they will likely have negative efficacy (more likely to have a COVID-19 infection) before two months have passed following being vaccinated.

Here’s the data from the report as their Figure 1:

In their Figure 2, we see the data past two months does, indeed, show a higher risk of COVID-19 diagnosis via an incidence rate ratio of <1. Values of the incidence ratio above 1.0 imply positive effectiveness; values <1.0 imply negative efficacy):

The authors try to confuse the reader with the following nonsense:

“Negative VE values observed in later timepoints likely reflect estimator instability and/or residual confounding, as opposed to true relatively increased risk for those vaccinated.”

Baloney. If this is true for the last time point, then it’s true for all of the time points. And the trend clearly shows the result in the last time point is not spurious.

The authors try to assure that the vaccine prevents serious illness, in the youngest age group, but since massive questions remain on false positives from PCR tests (they do not report Ct distributions), and the role of comorbid conditions is known, and they study does not adjust for comorbid conditions, the claims of reduced hospitalization rates and lowered incidence of severe disease cannot be accepted.

If the report were peer-reviewed, these issues might have been brought up, and the world would not, once again, be being told nonsense as fact by public health.

The Daily Mail reported on this, but has a misleading headline about “efficacy”, failing to pick up on the seriousness of the less-than-one incidence rate ratio. Daily Mail also confuses “efficacy” (measured in prospective randomized clinical trials) with “effectiveness” (measured in observational population studies)

Nevertheless, they provided a quote from Dr. Cody Meissner that shows that any attempts to expand this vaccine into the younger age groups won’t be easy:

“’I think we need to rethink this whole program of vaccinated adolescents and children. What is our objective?’ Dr (sic) Cody Meissner, the chief of pediatrics at Tufts Children’s Hospital in Boston and a member of the FDA’s Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, told DailyMail.com”

_________________

For more:

Category:

vaccines, Viruses

New FDA Chief Prioritizes Fighting ‘Misinformation’

https://news.yahoo.com/u-fda-chief-says-prioritize-215603641.html

New U.S. FDA chief says he will prioritize fighting misinformation

FILE PHOTO: FDA Commissioner nominee Califf testifies at nomination hearing in Washington
Ahmed Aboulenein
·2 min read

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Misinformation about science is increasingly prevalent and a significant public health threat that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration will focus on fighting, incoming Commissioner Robert Califf said on Thursday.

Califf, who was sworn in on Thursday, did not specify any particular misinformation the FDA should fight, but millions of Americans still refuse COVID-19 vaccines, with many conservative media outlets and Republicans in the U.S. Congress spreading doubt about their effectiveness.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

Unfortunately the ‘powers that be’ continue to use slight of hand tricks utilizing division to accomplish their goal of putting a needle in each and every arm come hell or high water.

Hopefully by now it is clear as day that these corrupt, powerful public health ‘authorities’ have severe conflicts of interest, direct ties to Big Pharma, and are now guilty of trying to stop free speech – which is a bedrock of freedom, and crucial for true science.  People should also be free to disagree and make their own choices. Medical freedom is particularly precious as across the board, “one size fits all” medicine is fundamentally flawed due to not taking individual differences, medical history, and personally held beliefs into account.

The gigantic elephant in the room is these experimental, mandated injections (which aren’t vaccines), haven’t stopped transmission or infection. They have caused more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS, and have not had any measurable impact on COVID mortality.  In short, they don’t work.

Califf, age 70, was FDA commissioner under Obama and has been severely criticized for his response to the opioid crisis.  He previously worked as a Big Pharma consultant and has millions in pharmaceutical investments.  Nine out of the last 10 FDA commissioners went on to work for Big Pharma or serve on a prescription drug company’s board of directors.  The FDA is broken, has mislead the public, is a captured agency, and has has lost ALL credibility.

This emphasis on fighting ‘misinformation’ is all a ruse for censorship upon anything the ‘powers that be’ deem a threat to their vested interests and has nothing whatsoever to do with health or science.  True science evolves, where debate and disagreement is encouraged as new information is continually being added to the picture.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

CDC Data: COVID Mass Vaccination Has Had No Measurable Impact on COVID Mortality in U.S.

https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/covid-19-vaccines/
PRESS RELEASE

Physicians for Informed Consent: CDC Data Show COVID-19 Mass Vaccination Has Had No Measurable Impact on COVID-19 Mortality in the U.S.

Newly released document highlights 20 scientific facts that challenge the assumptions underlying COVID-19 vaccine mandates.

NEWPORT BEACH, CALIF. (PRWeb) – February 22, 2022

Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC), an educational nonprofit organization focused on science and statistics, has released a new educational document entitled, “COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates: 20 Scientific Facts That Challenge the Assumptions.” The document helps readers become more familiarized with the scientific facts regarding COVID-19, its treatment options, and the COVID-19 vaccines.

Developed in a reader-friendly format, the document highlights available scientific data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials, and it addresses the assumptions underlying COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Twenty scientific facts are provided on key public health topics, including:

  • The lack of a long-term benefit of the COVID-19 vaccines on the spread of COVID-19
  • The lack of a proven benefit of the COVID-19 vaccines on COVID-19 deaths
  • The risks of COVID-19 vaccine injections versus the safety of SARS-CoV-2 infection in children
  • Waning vaccine immunity and booster shot efficacy
  • COVID-19 early-treatment and prevention options

“Vaccine mandates are unethical because they attempt to coerce people to act against their own judgment, and because they are unscientific,” said Dr. Shira Miller, founder and president of PIC. “Our focus is on delivering scientific data about infectious diseases and vaccines which are often overlooked in the mainstream. We developed this new document to help physicians, policymakers and the public better understand and communicate about the scientific facts that challenge the assumptions underlying COVID-19 vaccine mandates.”

The document reveals CDC data — from April 2020 through January 2022 — which show that mass vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine has had no measurable impact on COVID-19 mortality in the U.S. In addition, short-term clinical trial data indicate that 1 in 6 to 1 in 9 people 12–55 years of age who receive mRNA COVID-19 vaccines suffer severe (grade 3) systemic reactions, and long-term safety studies have not been conducted. And finally, more than 53% of Americans have already had COVID-19 and may have greater protection against reinfection than vaccinated people.

To download your copy of “COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates: 20 Scientific Facts That Challenge the Assumptions,” visit physiciansforinformedconsent.org/covid-19-vaccines. Readers are encouraged to share the document with their physicians, family and community.

About Physicians for Informed Consent

Physicians for Informed Consent is a 501(c)(3) educational nonprofit organization focused on science and statistics. PIC delivers data on infectious diseases and vaccines, and unites doctors, scientists, healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families who support voluntary vaccination. In addition, the PIC Coalition for Informed Consent consists of over 300 U.S. and international organizations that represent millions of people. To learn more or to become a member, please visit physiciansforinformedconsent.org.

COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates: 20 Scientific Facts That Challenge the Assumptions

Fact 1: “all transmissions between patients and staff occurred between masked and vaccinated individuals, as experienced in an outbreak from Finland.” The authors state that the study “challenges the assumption that high universal vaccination rates will lead to herd immunity and prevent COVID-19 outbreaks.”1

Fact 2: CDC study found that 74% of cases were fully vaccinated.2

Fact 3: Harvard study found “no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated.”3

Fact 4:  There is no evidence from clinical trials that any of the vaccines prevent death because they did not have enough statistical power to measure the vaccine’s ability to prevent deaths.4-6 The FDA states, “A larger number of individuals at high risk of COVID-19 and higher attack rates would be needed to confirm efficacy of the vaccine against mortality.”4-6

Fact 5: CDC study observed that 100% of severe, critical, and fatal cases of COVID-19 occurred in vaccinated individuals.1

Fact 6:  CDC data show mass vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine has had no measurable impact on COVID-19 mortality in the U.S.7

Fact 7:  In the Pfizer clinical trial, there were zero cases of severe COVID-19 in children who did notreceive the vaccine. 8,9  In contrast, for children 5 years or older, the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial found that the vaccine causes severe (grade 3) systemic reactions that include fever greater than 102.1° F; vomiting that requires IV hydration; diarrhea of six or more loose stools in 24 hours; and severe fatigue, severe headache, severe muscle pain, or severe joint pain that prevents daily activity.9-12

Fact 8:  In the clinical trial, a range of 1 in 59 to 1 in 143 vaccinated children 5 to 11 years of age suffered severe systemic reactions within seven days of the second dose. There were 3 to 8 cases of severe systemic reactions observed in the vaccinated group for every 10 cases of non-severe COVID-19 in the unvaccinated group.9

Fact 9:  In the clinical trial, 1 in 9 vaccinated adolescents 12 to 15 years of age suffered severe systemic reactions within seven days of receiving the second dose. There were 7 times more severe systemic reactions observed in the vaccinated group than non-severe COVID-19 cases in the unvaccinated group.10-12

Fact 10:  The clinical trial also found that 1 in about 1,100 vaccinated children 12 to 15 years of age had a grade 4 systemic reaction (fever greater than 104° F) after the first dose that required an ER visit and withdrawal from the study.10,13

Fact 11: The Pfizer clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to show the vaccine is safe in children under 18 years of age, as the study did not include enough subjects to establish safety (i.e., the clinical trial only included about 2,600 vaccinated children aged 5 to 15).9,14 In comparison, it is known that COVID-19 fatalities are rare in children. As of Nov. 3, 2021, the chance of a child 17 years or younger contracting SARS-CoV-2 and dying from COVID-19 was 1 in 126,000 or 0.0008%.15

Fact 12: Because all subjects in clinical trials were observed for only two to six months, the long- term safety of COVID-19 vaccines for any age group is not known. Per the FDA, there are currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of Pfizer, Moderna and Johnson & Johnson vaccines in subpopulations such as pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals.4,8,16 Per Pfizer, the vaccine “has not been evaluated for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility.”17

Fact 13: Safety surveillance reports have identified serious risks of myocarditis and pericarditis in subjects under age 40, within seven days of vaccination. In boys aged 16 or 17, the FDA has reported an excess risk of myocarditis or pericarditis of 1 in 5,000 after the second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine.18 And in boys aged 12 to 17, also after a second dose of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, a Hong Kong study found an excess risk of myocarditis or pericarditis of 1 in 2,700.19

Fact 14:  The clinical trials detected that vaccine immunity wanes significantly over a short period of time. For example, the Pfizer vaccine efficacy decreased by 8% to 18% within only six months, and the J&J vaccine efficacy decreased by 25% to 29% within only six months.20,21 Additionally, the efficacy measured in the clinical trials was against the original Wuhan strain, not the new variants.

Fact 15:  In clinical trials, a third dose of Pfizer or Moderna vaccine or a second dose of Johnson & Johnson vaccine has not been evaluated for efficacy against disease, but rather antibody counts were observed in a small number of vaccinated subjects for only one month.18,21,22

Fact 16:  Treatments for COVID-19 have improved significantly since the pandemic began in early 2020, resulting in improved survival rates in hospitalized cases.23,24 Indeed, for people not living in a nursing home, the overall survival rate of COVID-19 is 99.8% in the U.S., and 99.999% for children specifically.25,26

Fact 17:  Hundreds of studies have observed the effectiveness of various treatments, the most studied being ivermectin, vitamin D, hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), and monoclonal antibodies.27-30 These treatments may also be beneficial for prophylaxis (i.e., pre-exposure or post-exposure prevention of symptomatic COVID-19 infections).31-35

Fact 18:  There is evidence that previous SARS-CoV-2 infection is more effective at preventing SARS- CoV-2 infection than COVID-19 vaccines. The J& Jvaccine clinical trial included over 2,000 subjects who had contracted SARS-CoV-2 before the study. The trial, which tested unvaccinated and vaccinated people uniformly, recorded the incidence of COVID-19 in that unvaccinated group at least 28 days after the vaccination of the other subjects in the study. The COVID-19 incidence of the unvaccinated group with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.1% (2/2,021), whereas the COVID-19 incidence of vaccinated subjects was 0.59% (113/19,306). These data suggest that there are 6 times more cases of COVID-19 in vaccinated subjects than in unvaccinated subjects previously infected with SARS-CoV-2.36

Fact 19: Data from the Johnson & Johnson clinical trial also indicate that an unvaccinated person previously infected with SARS-CoV-2 has a 99.9% chance of being protected from a repeat infection. Of note, as of July 1, 2021, there have been 177.4 million SARS-CoV-2 infections in the U.S., which is 53.8% of the U.S. population.26,36

Fact 20:  Infection and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 occur at high rates in fully vaccinated populations, and a significant proportion of severe, critical and fatal COVID-19 cases occur in fully vaccinated individuals. CDC data show mass vaccination with the COVID-19 vaccine has had no measurable impact on COVID-19 mortality in the U.S. In addition, short-term clinical trial data indicate that 1 in 6 to 1 in 9 people 12–55 years of age who receive mRNA COVID-19 vaccines suffer severe (grade 3) systemic reactions, and long-term safety studies have not been conducted.13,37 Thus, the scientific data demonstrate that vaccine mandates have not been proven to create a safer environment.

Source

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

The Return of HIV?

**UPDATE April, 2022**

A Chinese gene-editing scientist was recently released from prison after being sentenced in 2019 for “illegally practicing medicine” as he altered the gene CCR5, which involved in HIV’s entrance into cells, in three embryos using CRISPR-Cas9 in an attempt to give the babies protection against HIV infection.

https://thehighwire.com/videos/the-return-of-hiv/  Video Here (Approx. 17 Min)

The Return of HIV?

The Highwire

Feb. 22, 2022

A new, highly virulent variant of HIV has suddenly popped up as the media is reporting everyone should be tested. Could there be a connection to Covid?  #HIVvariant #AIDSVaccine #HIV

  • In June, 2020, Nobel Prize Winner Dr Luc Montagnier stated COVID-19 has been manipulated and that components of HIV have been inserted into the viral sequence, perhaps in pursuit of an AIDS vaccine.  He stated:
    • SARS-CoV-2 appears to be a benign bat coronavirus modified to integrate spike proteins that allows the virus to enter human cells by attaching to ACE-2 receptors
    • The virus also appears to have been modified to integrate an envelope protein from HIV called GP141, which tends to impair the immune system. A third modification appears to involve nanotechnology, which allows the virus to remain airborne longer
  • Cellular and molecular microbiologist, Dr. Judy Mikoviz also believes COVID-19 is a product of human manipulation.  She states:
    • COVID-19 — the disease — is not caused by SARS-CoV-2 alone, but rather that it’s the result of a combination of SARS-CoV-2 and XMRVs (human gammaretroviruses)
    • SARS-CoV-2 also appears to have been manipulated to include components of HIV that destroys immune function along with XMRVs
    • Interestingly, both Dr. Birx and Dr. Redfield (head of CDC) are being investigated for research fraud regarding an AIDS vaccine.
  • In October, 2020 researchers warned that some COVID “vaccines” could increase risk of HIV infection. 
  • A 2009 study’s conclusion stated:  Ad5-specific T cells demonstrate a phenotype and proliferative potential that would support HIV infection; these results are pertinent to the findings of the Step Study and future use of Ad5 as a vaccine vector.

Regarding antibody testing, hopefully COVID testing has revealed the glaring, numerable flaws, but if this is new to you, please see:

“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment. ” Kary Mullis

For a brief, old interview with Mullis:  https://beforeitsnews.com/agenda-21/2020/12/kary-mullis-inventor-of-pcr-technique-about-science-fauci-and-their-agenda-engger-subtitles-  He’s obviously not a fan of Dr. Fauci.

If things were done right, “infection” would be a far cry from a positive PCR test.

“You have to have a whopping amount of any organism to cause symptoms. Huge amounts of it,” Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics told me. “You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. 30% of your infected cells have been killed before you show symptoms. By the time you show symptoms…the dead cells are generating the symptoms.”

I asked Dr. Rasnick what advice he has for people who want to be tested for COVID-19.

“Don’t do it, I say, when people ask me,” he replies. “No healthy person should be tested. It means nothing but it can destroy your life, make you absolutely miserable.”

Let’s review COVID testing:

Rephrased, the COVID test is a complete and utter flop which should demonstrate to all the CDC’s gross incompetence.

Lyme/MSIDS patients have struggled with the same testing issues for over 40 years with no signs of change.  Educate those around you on this pertinent fact.

For more: 

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses