Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

HHS Pays Media $1 Billion to Promote COVID shots & How the Government Hides Shady Deals

**UPDATE April, 2022**

HHS is far from alone.  Local, national media also paid MILLIONS to push COVID shots.

“We have just lived through the most expensive propaganda campaign in the history of the world and it was paid for with taxpayer dollars.  You paid for it, I paid for it.” ~ Emerald Robinson, former Newsmax reporter

Besides using bribery, investigative journalist Roger Charles has exposed the FBI’s “Sensitive Informant Program,” putting informants in the national media and other institutions supposedly to root out corruption, however:

“It is not a case of someone coming to the FBI offering to expose corruption. The bureau is recruiting spies.” ~ Jesse Trentadue, attorney

A recently released scathing, but heavily redacted, internal FBI audit found special agents breaking their own rules more than twice per reviewed case when investigating sensitive institutions. Other records suggest that the FBI used reporters as sources of information. Charles is also researching if the FBI has informants in the courts, Congress, media, and other government agencies. He argues that the court must decide whether FOIA exemptions advanced by the FBI for withholding portions of the FBI Manual apply, and if they do, can those exemptions be lawfully asserted to conceal unconstitutional and/or illegal activities.  The journalist has also uncovered undercover right-wing infiltration operations and previously hidden databases.

Some lawmakers are rightly questioning the bureau’s sweeping powers.

This historical lesson states that the CIA used to infiltrate the media but that now it IS the media.  For decades it has planted news stories in the media and continues on unabated.

And while the world was distracted by Will Smith, the internal elite met at the World Government Summit in Dubai where WEF head Klaus Schwab and ilk spoke of a “longer-term narrative” to make the world “more resilient, more inclusive, and more sustainable“. Interesting side-note to the Rock/Smith distraction is the fact that the 2022 Oscars were sponsored by Pfizer, the company that just happens to have a new Alopecia drug coming out very soon, which I’m sure is merely coincidental.  Seems everything today is “brought to you by Pfizer.”

https://thehighwire.com/videos/hhs-paying-newsrooms-to-promote-covid-vax-propaganda/  Video Here (Approx. 10 Min)

March 10, 2022

The following media outlets received HHS funding to peddle COVID jabs (your tax dollars at work):
  • ABC
  • CBS
  • NBC
  • Fox News
  • CNN
  • MSNBC
  • The New York Post
  • The Los Angeles Times
  • Washington Post
  • Buzzfeed News
  • Newsmax
  • hundreds of local newspapers and TV stations

The HHS is tasked with ensuring “vaccine” safety.  How on earth can they do this AND bribe media outlets to peddle COVID shots by only reporting positive findings?

http://

HHS Peddling COVID shots

March 16, 2022

Again, this is not informed consent.  This is propaganda where people are being paid.  Not once do you hear there are effective treatments making a “vaccine” unneeded, but you also never hear that these injections don’t stop infection or transmission, have any measurable impact upon mortality, set people up for more severe illness, including hospitalization, and are linked to more adverse reactions and & death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.

This video shows clip after clip of news outlets stating the EXACT SAME THINGS.  Now we know why.  They were all paid and told what to say.  This even made the NY Times. And this montage shows how every commercial during the plandemic is also eerily the same.

http://  Approx. 2 Min

It’s not supply and demand, it’s supply and de(mandate)

Bret Weinstein PdD

March 14, 2022

Weinstein states that public health typically oversimplifies things to get you to do the “right” thing. He calls these “noble lies,” however, COVID has shown that the current lies are corrupt lies, which have resulted in massive amounts of money going to those with vested interests.  These companies are using the government to coerce the use of their products.  We need to be hyper vigilant that what we are being told is NOT in our best interest.

For more:

http://

The information War

Seems everyone is picking sides these days based on a simplistic accepted narrative.  Pfizer says it will stop clinical trials in Russia and donate all of its profits from the country to humanitarian aid efforts in Ukraine. (The Hill)

Pfizer has also put out creepy ads targeting children.  The ads claim kids that get the COVID jabs are “super heroes,” despite the fact children rarely get severe COVID, die from it, or transmit it.

________________

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/03/14/nih-conflicts-of-interest

Massive Conflicts of Interest at the NIH

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked

March 14, 2022

nih conflicts of interest

Story at-a-glance

  • One of the primary vehicles for kickbacks and fraud seems to be foundations associated with federal agencies. The reason they’re so frequently used for questionable transactions is because foundations are private entities and not subject to Freedom of Information Act requests and other open records laws
  • The board of directors of the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) is heavily populated with Big Pharma players. This raises serious questions about conflicts of interest, as the foundation oversees the distribution of hundreds of millions of dollars — unregulated funds that typically go right back into the coffers of the drug industry
  • This conflict of interest also, at least in part, helps explain the actions of Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and now-retired director of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins. Both have gone out of their way to protect the makers of COVID shots and dismiss evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was created in and escaped from a lab
  • Dr. Julie Gerberding became the FNIH CEO March 1, 2022. She was formerly director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. After leaving the CDC, she became the executive vice president of strategic communications at Merck
  • The FNIH’s board of directors includes seven current or former drug company executives, the FDA, the Sackler family (notorious for its creation of a deadly opioid epidemic), Johns Hopkins (co-sponsor of Event 201, which “predicted” COVID-19 and the subsequent destruction of human rights), and two major investment bankers, Goldman Sachs and BlackRock

One of the primary vehicles for kickbacks and fraud seems to be foundations associated with federal agencies. This article will highlight and expose yet another way we are being conned and manipulated by examining the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health1 (FNIH), whose board is plastered with major Big Pharma players.

This raises serious questions about conflicts of interest, seeing how the foundation oversees the distribution of hundreds of millions of dollars — unregulated funds that typically go right back into the coffers of the drug industry. It’s a very clever strategy to extract even more funds from the American taxpayers.

This conflict of interest also, at least in part, helps explain the actions of Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and now-retired director of the NIH, Dr. Francis Collins.2 Both have gone out of their way to protect the makers of COVID shots and dismiss evidence that SARS-CoV-2 was created in and escaped from a lab.

FNIH Board — A Who’s Who of Big Pharma

In 2020, Fauci received the FNIH’s Charles A. Sanders MD Partnership Award for his leadership and support of “FNIH programs propelling research in lethal infectious diseases.”3

Dr. Charles Sanders was the FNIH chairman between 1996 and 2016. Before that, he was the chairman and CEO of Glaxo Inc. He also spent eight years with Squibb Corp., where he held several positions, including CEO of the Science and Technology Group.4 He’s currently a member of the FNIH board of directors.

In the video above, Fauci is interviewed by Dr. Freda Lewis-Hall about his career, his achievements and the public-private partnerships that allowed for the creation of Operation Warp Speed and the rapid deployment of a COVID-19 jab. Lewis-Hall is a former chief medical officer and executive vice president at Pfizer. She is also a current board member of the FNIH.

Another striking member of the FNIH’s board is Dr. Julie Gerberding. If you have a sharp memory for details, you may recall she served as director of the CDC from 2002 to 2009.

After resigning from the CDC, she entered the express revolving door between industry and government and was hired by Merck as their vice president in charge of vaccines. Imagine that — the head of the government agency responsible for policing vaccines is hired by one of the world’s largest producers of vaccines.

Sadly, it’s all perfectly legal. Later, she oversaw global public policy and strategic communications at Merck, followed by a position as chief patient officer and executive vice president for population health and sustainability.5 Gerberding has now taken her nefarious behavior to an entirely new level. She’s slid back through yet another revolving door and is the CEO of FNIH as of March 1, 2022.6 Other FNIH board members include:

Chairman Dr. Steven Paul, CEO and chairman of Karuna Therapeutics
Marijn Dekkers, Ph.D., chairman of Novalis LifeSciences
Paul Herrling, Ph.D., chairman for the Novartis Institute for Tropical Diseases
Dr. Paul Stoffels, vice chairman of the executive committee and chief scientific officer for Johnson & Johnson
Jillian Sackler, president and CEO of the Dame Jillian and Dr. Arthur M. Sackler Foundation for the Arts, Sciences and Humanities
Dr. Elias Zerhouni, Professor Emeritus, Johns Hopkins University
James Donovan, a Goldman Sachs partner
Russel Steenberg, managing director and global head of BlackRock Private Equity Partners

The two non-voting directors are Collins and Dr. Stephen Hahn, the current commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration. This is quite the list.

We’ve got seven current or former drug company executives, the CDC, the FDA, the Sackler family (notorious for its creation of a deadly opioid epidemic), Johns Hopkins (co-sponsor of Event 201, which “predicted” COVID-19 and the subsequent destruction of human rights), and two major investment bankers, Goldman Sachs and BlackRock.

The inclusion of BlackRock is particularly interesting, and disturbing, considering they have a hidden monopoly on global asset holdings. Together with Vanguard, BlackRock has ownership in some 1,600 American firms, which in 2015 had combined revenues of $9.1 trillion. If you add in the third-largest global asset holder, State Street, their combined ownership encompasses nearly 90% of all S&P 500 firms.7 Just what is BlackRock doing on the FNIH’s board of directors?

Who Funds the FNIH?

Then there are the donors. The largest donor to the FNIH is none other than Bill Gates. According to the FNIH’s 2020 statutory report,8 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donated $96,981,262 that year, accounting for 15% of the Foundation’s annual revenue.9

In 2019, the Gates Foundation’s contribution of $49,827,480 accounted for 35% of the annual revenue.10,11,12 As the top donor, it’s not farfetched to assume Gates might have significant leverage over the direction of the foundation and its funds. GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Eli Lilly, Pfizer and Wellcome also donated between $5 million and $10 million each in 2020.13 FNIH programs funded by the Gates Foundation include but are not limited to:

  • Combining Epitope Based Vaccine Design with Informatics-Based Evaluation
  • Comprehensive Cellular Vaccine Immune Monitoring Consortium
  • Global collaborative for Coordination of Gene Drive Research and Development
  • The Partnership to Accelerate Novel TB Regimens
  • mRNA encoded HIV Env-Gag Virus-like-particle Vaccines

The last program on the list — the creation of novel mRNA-based HIV vaccines — is described14 as a project to “test a new HIV vaccine concept in animals using noninfectious ‘virus-like particles’ encoded by an RNA vaccine with the goal of inducing protective antibody responses.”

The initial request for collaboration came from the NIAID at the end of July 2020. In August 2020, the FNIH Portfolio Oversight Committee approved the project, “contingent upon a commitment of full funding in the amount of $1.45 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.”

The Gates Foundation fulfilled that commitment in October 2020. A memorandum of understanding between the FNIH and the NIAID was finalized in early 2021. A sub-award was granted to the University of Montreal (CHUM), and Bioqual was given a service agreement to manage the clinical trial.

Bill Gates also contributes to the FNIH through Gates Ventures,15 a rapidly growing venture capital and investment firm that works side by side with the Gates Foundation’s program teams “to identify investment opportunities.”16 Specifically, Gates Ventures is an organizational donor to the FNIH’s Biomarkers Consortium (BC), a cancer steering committee, alongside a long list of drug companies.

Congress Seeks Greater Transparency

As mentioned earlier, all of this can help explain Fauci’s and Collins’ behavior during the COVID pandemic. Collins is a board member, Fauci got the foundation’s top reward for support in 2020, and money flows into the foundation from drug companies and Gates, all of whom have vested interests in making sure that whatever the NIH does and recommends to the public, it will produce profits for them.

According to its 2020 Statutory Report,17 the FNIH has raised more than $1.2 billion, and as mentioned earlier, most of that money goes right back to the drug industry, without Congressional appropriation or oversight. While the whole thing reeks of conflicts of interest, it may be difficult to get to the bottom of because, as a 501c3, the FNIH is cleverly exempt from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests.

Nonprofits are considered private entities, and therefore not subject to FOIA and other open records laws.18,19 However, the NIH is subject to FOIA since it’s a government agency, and the funds raised go to the NIH. Basically, it’s a system set up to bypass oversight, and the U.S. Congress is responsible for creating this fraud-fraught system.

Congress Created This Fraud-Fraught System

Congress is responsible for the oversight of federal agencies, but in the early 1990s, it created what sure looks like a pay-to-play system. Not only did Congress create the FNIH, they also set up the CDC Foundation,20 which funnels millions of dollars from drug companies and vaccine makers into the CDC.21

This explains the CDC’s highly irrational and harmful COVID recommendations. The fact that the CDC lies about its pharma funding only makes it all the more suspicious. The CDC has long fostered the perception of independence by stating it does not accept funding from special interests.

In disclaimers peppered throughout the CDC’s website22 and in its publications, it says the agency “does not accept commercial support” and has “no financial interests or other relationships with the manufacturers of commercial products.” With the information exposed in this article it is obvious that this is a cleverly obfuscated pack of lies — all possible through sheer semantics, as the funds are diverted through the foundation rather than going straight to the CDC.

In 2019, several watchdog groups — including the U.S. Right to Know (USRTK), Public Citizen, Knowledge Ecology International, Liberty Coalition and the Project on Government Oversight — petitioned23 the CDC to stop making these false disclaimers24 because, in reality, the CDC receives millions of dollars each year from commercial interests through its government-chartered foundation, the CDC Foundation, which funnels those contributions to the CDC after deducting a fee.25

On the CDC Foundation’s website, you’ll find a long list26 of “corporate partners” that have provided the CDC with funding over the years. The CDC even accepts money earmarked for specific studies or programs aimed at expanding corporate profits or reducing drug companies’ liability exposure.27

As just one example, in 2018, Collins ended up canceling a $100 million study to assess the effects of moderate alcohol consumption after it was discovered that the NIH had inappropriately solicited money for the study directly from the spirits industry, and had designed the study “to satisfy industry interests.”28 Collins also had to ditch a $400 million study into opioid dependency after an independent panel warned there were potential conflicts of interest.29

In 2018, a congressional spending panel also warned the FNIH and the CDC Foundation that their disclosures of financial donations were inadequate. As reported by Science at the end of June 2018:30

“Congress created the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) and the CDC Foundation … to raise private funds to support federal biomedical and health research.

It hoped to encourage transparency and prevent potential conflicts of interest by specifying in the law that the foundations had to report ‘the source and amount of all gifts’ they receive, as well as any restrictions on how the donations could be used.

But last week, legislators on the House of Representatives appropriations subcommittee that oversees NIH and CDC expressed concern that the foundations may not be following those disclosure rules …

A report accompanying a 2019 spending bill moving through Congress reminds the foundations to abide by the PHSA when writing their annual reports … The lawmakers also say it’s not OK to hide the identity of donors who have attached strings to their gift by labeling them as ‘anonymous.’

The language ‘is a marker that we want more transparency,’ says one House appropriations staffer, speaking on background because of committee rules on who can speak to the press. ‘We’d like to see [the foundations] go further, and this language is meant to start a conversation.’”

Among “anonymous” donors to the FNIH in 2016 were the Gates Foundation, despite having given a sizeable $19.1 million grant.31 While the financial statements of these foundations may have improved since 2018, the system itself, which gives private industry the power to influence regulatory agencies through unregulated funding, remains unchanged.

Globalists Aim to Take Over Health Systems Worldwide

The reason for having a BlackRock representative on the FNIH’s board of directors could potentially have something to do with the globalists’ plan to monopolize health systems worldwide — a plan that is taking shape as we speak.

In June 2021, Gerberding, now head of the FNIH, wrote a Time article32 laying out the framework for an international pandemic-surveillance network, which would include threat prediction and preemption as well. While Gerberding did not name the World Health Organization, we now know that’s the organization designated as the top-down ruler, not only of all things related to pandemics but also health in general. I’ll have an entire article detailing this in tomorrow’s newsletter.

It’s important to realize that unless we can somehow prevent the WHO from acquiring this power, it will be able to dictate things like mandatory vaccinations and health passports moving forward, and its dictates would supersede all national and state laws. We simply cannot let this happen.

At the same time, we need to realize just how bought and paid for our U.S. regulatory agencies are, and figure out a way to clean up that mess. There’s been a revolving door between government and private industry for decades, which is how we got here in the first place. Closing that door might be a first step in the right direction, but it’s not going to be enough by itself.

The NIH, CDC and the Food and Drug Administration are all so thoroughly infiltrated by industry, restoring them to their intended functions is no easy task. Disturbingly, the same technocratic powers that are working to give the WHO global power over global health have also infiltrated these U.S. agencies. As a result, they’re unlikely to push back. They’re going to be more than willing to take orders from the WHO.

Category:

Activism, vaccines

The Truth is Coming Out About COVID Deaths

https://www.theepochtimes.com/massachusetts-to-reduce-significant-overcount-of-covid-19-deaths

Massachusetts to Reduce ‘Significant Overcount’ of COVID-19 Deaths

By Harry Lee
March 11, 2022 Updated: March 11, 2022

The Massachusetts Public Health Department announced Thursday that the state would lower its COVID-19 death count by 3,700 due to new measuring criteria being implemented.  (See link for article)

Important quote:

“Our approach proved to be too expansive and led to a significant overcount of deaths in Massachusetts,” Public Health Commissioner Margret Cooke told the State House News Service.

As of March 9, Massachusetts reported 23,732 confirmed and probable COVID-19 deaths since the pandemic. The figure will drop to around 20,000 on March 14, when the department starts using the new criteria.

That’s roughly about 15 percent of the total death toll.

______________

https://www.theepochtimes.com/desantis-medical-panel-voice-concerns-over-lockdowns-lack-of-trust-post-covid-19

DeSantis, Medical Panel Voice Concerns Over Lockdowns, Lack of Trust Post COVID-19

By Jannis Falkenstern
March 8, 2022 Updated: March 8, 2022

PUNTA GORDA, Florida–Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis met with 11 medical professionals in West Palm Beach on March 7 to evaluate the past two years of lockdowns and mandates and their effect on society, at a live virtual event co-hosted by the state surgeon general Dr. Joseph Ladapo.  (See link for article)

SUMMARY:

The panel made up of medical professionals from private practice to academia from all over the U.S. agreed on the following:

  • two years of mandates and lockdowns did little to deter the virus
  • there is now a lack of trust in the medical establishment and the CDC due to politicization
  • we should never forget the overarching government abuse of powers, data, as well as the dishonesty, and unethical behavior
  • the gov. & medical agencies should be held accountable.  If we forget, it can happen again.
  • The CDC has been withholding large amounts of data throughout the pandemic and is acting as a political arm.
  • The government has invested over a billion dollars in marketing vaccines to citizens.
    • government spending estimates for the development and manufacturing of COVID shots are between $18 billion and $23 billion.
    • The Congressional Budget Office estimated that the Biomedical Research and Development Authority (BARDA) alone has spent $19.3 billion on COVID-19 shot development.
    • In addition, Lisa Cornish projected $39.5 billion in US spending.
    • In 2021, over $10 billion was gained by just 8 share-holders of Pfizer & Moderna.
  • Physicians have been heavily criticized, censored, fired, and banned for even speaking of early treatments.  The FDA has had an active role in this, and the Feds are giving tech companies until May, 2022 to rat-out those engaging in “misinformation.”

https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-truth-is-coming-out-about-covid-deaths

The Truth Is Coming Out About COVID Deaths

By Joseph Mercola
March 1, 2022 Updated: March 2, 2022

Hospitals receive payments for testing every patient for COVID, every COVID diagnosis and every ‘COVID death,’ as well as any time they use remdesivir and mechanical ventilation.

Early on in the COVID pandemic, people suspected that the deaths attributed to the infection were exaggerated. There was plenty of evidence for this. For starters, hospitals were instructed and incentivized to mark any patient who had a positive COVID test and subsequently died within a certain time period as a COVID death.

At the same time, we knew that the PCR test was unreliable, producing inordinate amounts of false positives. Now, the truth is finally starting to come out and, as suspected, the actual death toll is vastly lower than we were led to believe.

COVID Deaths Have Been Vastly Overcounted

In the video below, Dr. John Campbell reviews recent data released by the U.K. government in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. (See link for article)

http://  Approx. 17 Min

Jan. 20, 2022

Freedom of Information Discussion with Dr. John Campbell

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • UK health secretary admitted daily figures are unreliable as people continue to die from things unrelated to COVID but are included due to a positive test.
  • 40% of patients counted as hospitalized COVID cases were not even admitted due to COVID symptoms.  They simply tested positive.
  • Of the 17,371 who had COVID-19 as the sole cause of death, 13,597 were 65 or older. The average age of death in the U.K. from COVID in 2021 was 82.5 years. The projected life expectancy in the U.K. is 79 for men and 82.9 for women. This hardly constitutes an emergency, least of all for healthy school- and working-age individuals.
  • Campell shows excess cancer deaths due to delayed diagnosis and inability to get treatment due to lockdowns.
  • US data suggest a similar pattern of exaggerated COVID death statistics.  CDC’s Walensky stated that 77.8% of people who had received the COVID jab yet died from/with COVID also had, on average, four comorbidities.  She admitted that the risk of death is only for the sickest among us, whether you are ‘vaccinated’ or not.
  • A 2020 study found 88% of hospitalized COVID patients in New York City had two or more comorbidities, 6.3% had one underlying health condition and 6.1% had none. This was before COVID shots.
  • CDC 2020 data showed only 6% of the total death count had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death. The remaining 94% had had an average of 2.6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that contributed to their deaths.
  • Most COVID deaths were likely due to ventilator malpractice: 
    • 80% of COVID-19 patients in NYC who were placed on ventilators died
    • 66% of ventilated COVID patients died in the U.K.
    • 86% of ventilated patients in Wuhan died
    • Despite this, mechanical ventilation is “standard of care” to this day
  • There are numerous safe alternatives to ventilation including:
    • Hyperbaric oxygen treatment
    • nasal cannulas – which are noninvasive
    • prone positioning, a technique where patients lay on their stomachs to aid breathing
    • UChicago Medicine found that combining proning and high-flow nasal cannulas brought patient oxygen levels from around 40% to 80% and 90%
    • The article states that for breathing difficulties, proning can be used at home and to try to avoid spending a lot of time lying flat on your back
  • US hospitals lose federal funding if they administer treatments that are not “approved.” They also receive incentives for the following:
    • COVID testing for all patients
    • COVID diagnoses
    • Admitting a “COVID patient”
    • Use of remdesivir (which has been shown to cause severe organ damage)
    • Use of mechanical ventilation
    • COVID deaths (coroners are also given bonuses)
  • Hospitals have also waived patient rights making them prisoners of the hospital.
  • Renz and a team of data analysts have estimated that more than 800,000 deaths in America’s hospitals, in COVID-19 and other patients, have been caused by approaches restricting fluids, nutrition, antibiotics, effective antivirals, anti-inflammatories, and therapeutic doses of anti-coagulants.
  • Renz showed CMS data from Texas hospitals which showed 84.9% % of all patients died after more than 96 hours on a ventilator.
  • Mercola states you should have what you need on hand when symptoms arise and that it’s always best to treat COVID symptoms immediately and aggressively.  For example:

Mercola has a summary of the treatment specifics in the top link of the article.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Planet Lockdown: A Documentary

https://tube.source.news/w/v8VntcKH2eMkDG5KLEx3Fd  Documentary here for FREE for a limited time

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/03/12/planet-lockdown-documentary

Planet Lockdown: A Documentary

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola
March 12, 2022

Story at-a-glance

  • The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe
  • Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that coached him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis incorrectly
  • The notion of asymptomatic spread turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy or a threat, furthering fear and control
  • The artificially imposed state of incoherence that’s been enacted during the pandemic is described as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots
  • Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which is being violated as people are forced to get experimental shots
  • Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom

Prior to 2020, if you heard the term “lockdown” you might think of something that happens in a prison — not in a free society. This mechanism of control has since become commonplace — not among prisoners but among the free — with repercussions that are only beginning to be understood.

The film Planet Lockdown explores this unprecedented time in history, speaking with epidemiologists, scientists, doctors and other experts to uncover the real motives behind the increasing totalitarian control taking over the globe. Already banned by Facebook and YouTube,1 the film starts at the beginning of the pandemic, when we were told lockdowns were necessary to “flatten the curve.”

This was supposed to be a short-term, 15-day event in the U.S., but the narrative soon changed to ongoing restrictions. As Michael Yeadon, Ph.D., a former vice-president and chief scientific adviser of the drug company Pfizer and founder and CEO of the biotech company Ziarco, now owned by Novartis, explained, people have historically quarantined the sick, but quarantining healthy people, as has occurred for the past two years, has no scientific backing or historic precedence.2

“Given this virus represents, at most, a slightly bigger risk to the old and ill than seasonal influenza, and a less risk, a smaller risk, to almost everyone else who’s younger and fit,” Yeadon says, “it was never necessary for us to have done anything. We didn’t need to do anything — lockdowns, masks, testing, vaccines even.”3

Questionable Practices Urged for COVID-19 Diagnosis

Dr. Scott Jensen, a family doctor and former member of the Minnesota Senate, received an email from the Department of Health that seemed to be coaching him to use COVID-19 as a diagnosis in situations where he wouldn’t have previously used influenza or any other specific viral diagnosis without first testing for it. He said:4

“What struck me right away was I felt like I was being coached to go ahead and use COVID-19 without using the same standards of precision that I would for other things. If I’m going to make a diagnosis, I believe as a physician I have an obligation to use the tools available to me to nail it down with as much certainty as possible.

And it seemed to me that the Department of Health, and the link to this CDC document that said you could diagnose COVID-19 as a cause of death on a death certificate … those two documents, in tandem, went against everything that I had been taught or doing for the last 35 years.”

Even Dr. Ngozi Ezike, director of the Illinois Department of Health, is featured in the film stating that even if you died of a clear alternate cause, if you had COVID-19 at the same time, it would still be listed as a COVID death. “Everyone who is listed as a COVID death, doesn’t mean that was the cause of the death,” she says.5

In January 2020, the PCR test for COVID-19 came out, which allowed health officials to define COVID-19 “cases.” If the test was positive, it counted as a case — it didn’t matter if you have symptoms or not. Reiner Fuellmich, global fraud attorney, founder of the Corona Investigative Committee, pointed out, “It’s never, in the history of mankind, in the history of medicine, there’s never been testing of healthy people.”6

Yeadon agrees that mass testing of people with no symptoms has no scientific basis. Rather, he says, “It’s just a way to frighten people.”7 The rising “cases,” based on PCR testing, is what built the crisis. But counting cases was only measuring the activity of testing; the more that testing occurred, the more cases that were found.

‘Fear Everyone’ Became the Message

June 8, 2020, WHO director general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus announced that asymptomatic people could transmit COVID-19. That same day, Maria Van Kerkhove, WHO technical lead for the COVID-19 pandemic, made it very clear that people who have COVID-19 without any symptoms “rarely” transmit the disease to others. In a dramatic about-face, WHO then backtracked on the statement just one day later.8

In the days that followed, media and health officials ramped up fear by claiming that you could be sickened by virtually anyone, even when they appeared to be healthy. “This idea that … you can be ill even though you have no symptoms and you can be a … virus threat to someone else even though you have no symptoms, that’s also invented in 2020,” Yeadon says.9

Alexandra Henrion-Caude, geneticist, former director of research with the French National Institute of Health, is among those who have noticed something off from the start. “I was very puzzled since the very beginning … I was alert to the fact that what we were living was not quite right.”10

She notes that the notion of asymptomatic spread is terrifying because it turns virtually anyone you meet or encounter on the street into the enemy, because they could be exposing you to SARS-CoV-2.

“This is actually terrible because it denies the capacity of a person to be a healthy person. Because if asymptomatic [spread] exists, then who is healthy? No one.”

What’s more, the “proof” of asymptomatic spread is flawed and fraudulent. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article suggesting the transmission of COVID-19 is possible from an asymptomatic carrier in January 2020.11

It was based on a 33-year-old businessman who had met with his business partner from Shanghai, then developed a fever and productive cough. The next evening, he felt better and went back to work January 27.

The writers reported the partner had been “well with no signs or symptoms of infection, but had become ill on her flight back to China, where she tested positive for 2019-nCoV on January 26.” From this case study, they theorized the virus could be transmitted from asymptomatic carriers. An important point was left out, which is that the researchers did not speak with the partner from Shanghai before publication.

However, Germany’s public health agency, the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), did speak with the woman on the phone, and she reported she did have symptoms while in Germany.12 So she was not asymptomatic after all.

In a State of Incoherence, People Crave Normalcy

The pandemic has twisted reality, leaving the public in a mental fog. “You’re regularly pledging obedience to things which are not logical,” Catherine Austin-Fitts, assistant secretary, Bush Sr. administration and investment adviser with Solari, Inc., says.13 WHO has changed definitions of herd immunity and pandemic, literally altering reality, and this is just one example.

Censorship and campaigns to discredit those who speak out against the narrative are additional control mechanisms that distort the truth. Bishop Schneider of Kazakhstan says the pandemic measures are very similar to Soviet times where he lived, in that there was only one narrative, and if you said there was another meaning, you were declared an enemy.

“When you had another opinion, they said, ‘You are a conspiracy group. You have a conspiracy theory. You have hate speech. This expression, hate speech, came from the communists.”14 It’s psychological manipulation, based on fear, which makes people act totally irrational. The artificially imposed state of incoherence was even described by Austin-Fitts as a torture tactic, designed to get people to submit to vaccine passports and COVID-19 shots:15

“Human beings crave coherence. And so if you can put them in a state of incoherence they will literally do anything they can to get back to coherence. It’s a typical torture tactic. ‘If you just do what I want, I will allow you to go back to a state of coherence.’ So, if you just accept the [vaccine] passports, you’ll be free. Or if you get the vaccination, you’ll just be free.”

Further, by declaring small businesses as “nonessential” during lockdowns, they get shut down, while Amazon, Walmart and other big box stores can take over their market share. A major transfer of wealth occurred away from small family-owned businesses to very large, publicly owned businesses that benefited from the digital economy. In the meantime, Austin-Fitts explains:16

“The people on Main St. have to keep paying off their credit cards or their mortgage, so they’re in a debt trap and they’re desperate to get cashflow to cover their debts and expenses.

In the meantime, you have the Federal Reserve institute a form of quantitative easing where they’re buying corporate bonds, and the guys who are taking up the market share can basically finance — or their banks can — at 0% to 1%, when everyone on Main St. is paying 16% to 17% to their credit cards, without income.

So basically now you’ve got them over a barrel and you can take away their market share, and generally they can’t afford to do what they say because they’re too busy trying to find money to feed their kids.”

New Control Systems Are Being Engineered

If a few people want to control many, how can you get the sheep into the slaughterhouse without them realizing and resisting? “The perfect thing,” Austin-Fitts says, is invisible enemies, like viruses.17 This ramps up fear so the public believes they need the government to protect them. Another effective tactic is “divide and conquer,” and the media plays an important role in this, dividing people over shots and masks, for instance.

“What COVID-19 is,” Austin-Fitts explains, “is the institution of controls necessary to convert the planet from the democratic process to technocracy. So what we’re watching is a change in control and an engineering of new control systems. So think of this as a coup d’état. It’s much more like a coup d’état than a virus.”18

Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg, a former public health official and member of German parliament, agrees, stating that pandemic responses have “nothing to do with hygiene. It has to do with criminology.“19 The global injection campaign is another form of control, one that’s forcing the public to receive experimental shots.

Many of the experts in the film bring up the Nuremberg Code, which spells out a set of research ethics principles for human experimentation. This set of principles was developed to ensure the medical horrors discovered during the Nuremberg trials at the end of World War II would never take place again.

But in the current climate of extreme censorship, people are not being informed about the full risks of the shots — which are only beginning to be uncovered. People are being forced into the shots due to mandates and loss of jobs and personal freedoms, like the ability to travel freely and attend business and social events.

In the End, Truth Will Win

A revolution is occurring, and the experts are hopeful that people will awaken to common sense and resist the totalitarian control that is threatening to take over the globe. Instead, society can be regenerated if people come together and fight back against the encroachment on our liberties.

Civil disobedience, boycotting businesses that are requiring vaccine passports, participating in rallies and fighting illegal mandates in court are ways that everyone can get involved in protecting freedom. “If they want to make us a machine, if they want to make us slaves, we say no,” Wodarg says. “… We don’t need you anymore, we are many … we don’t have to be afraid of any pandemic.”20

About the Director

james patrick

I believe in bringing quality to my readers, which is why I wanted to share some information about the filmmaker, James Patrick, from “Planet Lockdown.” Here is a little more about him and what went in to making this film. Thank you James for sharing with us.

What was your inspiration for making this film?

I was in Spain when the lockdowns started, studying a PHD in economics. I escaped to southern France and a week later back to the states. I immediately saw the lockdowns as an economic takedown of the middle class rather than a virus mitigation strategy.

I looked into the academic reference of lockdown as a strategy and they were only mentioned twice and strongly recommended against as the damages would be worse than any benefit.

As an ancestor of Patrick Henry and passionate lover of human liberty, I was so upset by the lockdowns and what they meant for our future, I needed to do something about it. Within a few months I embarked on making a documentary film. The situation developed so quickly I began putting the full interviews out and it became an interview series as well.

I was able to get the best and brightest experts in the world to sit down and tell me their story. It is a high level, intimate look at what happened these last two years, from 2 weeks of lockdown to flatten the curve to Lockouts for the unvaccinated.

What do you hope people take away from the film?

The film takes the viewer on a journey through the whole COVID saga. The film and the full interviews forms an educational body of work that helps the public understand what is going on, how we got here, where are we and where this is headed if we don’t put a stop to this. Enough damage has been done. We have to make sure this never happens again or a lot worse things will happen.

Where do the proceeds to your film go?

Proceeds to the project go to cover the expenses of the film and ongoing interview series. These include travel, equipment, and payment for cameramen, sound, edits, audio technicians and web hosting expenses. We have done this project on a shoestring budget and donations are critical to keeping this high quality content coming to earn the public about what is happening and what is to come.

No other film project is addressing the situation from an international perspective, which is required to have a full understanding of what is happening. This is a global operation. We work with colleagues in UK, EU and Africa to capture the situation. We are doing this project as a public service and it isn’t free. To date it has been driven by people contributing their time unpaid, myself especially, so donations help covers these out of pocket expenses incurred.
Sources and References

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

FDA Releases Pfizer Docs But Worries About Cherry-Picking, Which it Does Itself With Abandon

**UPDATE April 6, 2022**

As they say: “Follow the money”.

More and more is trickling out about Pfizer including whistleblowers stating the shot is a bioweapon, data was falsified, internal emails tried to cover up fetal cell usage, that it copies the mRNA spike protein into human DNA, has caused increased COVID in young kids, and the suspicious coincidence that the 2022 Oscars were sponsored by Pfizer, the company that just happens to have a new Alopecia drug coming out very soon, and the Rock/Smith distraction. Seems everything today is “brought to you by Pfizer.”

https://www.medpagetoday.com/special-reports/exclusives

FDA Begins Releasing Pfizer COVID Vax Documents

— Court-ordered release runs risk of “cherry picking and taking things out of context”

by Amanda D’Ambrosio, Enterprise & Investigative Writer, MedPage Today March 7, 2022

A computer rendering of a man in a suit looking at a document while standing on top of and surrounded by tall stacks of paper

The FDA turned over thousands of documents related to its review of Pfizer-BioNTech’s COVID-19 vaccine last week, marking the first of several releases mandated by a court in Texas earlier this year.

The agency released 55,000 pages of COVID-19 vaccine review documents last Tuesday, following a loss in court months earlier that forced it to expedite its process to make the information available to the public. In a January court order, U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released — totaling more than 300,000 pages.  (See link for article)

___________________

http://

Pfizer Vax Docs Released by Court Order

Dr. John Campbell

3/9/22

Nine pages of side effects listed, some have not been confirmed. Nearly 159,000 side effects were listed which means each person on average reported 3-4 different side-effects.

Reporting is voluntary and the magnitude of under reporting is unknown; however, if we are to look at a 2011 report by Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, VAERS only captures fewer than 1% of adverse reactions. It also only captures less than 0.3% of all adverse drug events, and only 1-13% of serious events are reported to the FDA. Historically, under reporting is prolific.

Dr. Jesse Santiano lists the Pfizer adverse events of “special interest” and states these are events that should be monitored by the drug or “vaccine” company.  The events can be severe or not serious, but can lead to a serious medical condition.  He also states that more than 95% of the events listed are negatively impacting and life-changing.  Most doctors and nurses are unaware of this list, created by Pfizer itself on conditions to look for after people get COVID shots.  Anyone getting these or other reactions (not listed) should report them to Pfizer and VAERS even if you received a shot from a different manufacturer.  Dr. Santiano has listed the conditions in alphabetical order, many with links for you to read about them, as well as research articles.  You should also check out his updated list of COVID articles – all great resources.

SUMMARY:

  • It took a nonprofit suing the FDA for COVID shot data to be released to the public.
  • The FDA wanted 55-75 years to release the information.
  • The FDA redacts confidential business and private info as well as trade secrets.
  • The court concluded the release of data is of “paramount public importance” that is “necessary”.
  • The article is quick to point out that “anti-vax” advocates have already capitalized on the release of data and immediately calls out Children’s Health Defense, run by John F. Kennedy who has stated repeatedly he is not “anti-vax,” yet facts be damned. It’s more important to name call and bully than present facts.
  • Predictably, the FDA is very worried about people cherry-picking data, which ironically is also supposedly why the CDC was recently caught red-handed withholding data for more than a year.  This is where we should hear the booming voice of Colonel Jessup in “A Few Good Men”:  http://
  • Then, Medpage finger points at specific doctors they state are “known for spreading false or misleading information during the pandemic.” The bullying and name calling is tangible. And now, the Feds are giving Big Tech until May 3, 2022 to rat out those engaging in “misinformation,” with the new FDA chief throwing his weight behind it too.

Speaking of “cherry picking”, the CDC reports that 6 months of U.S. Data finds adverse events caused by COVID shots to be “minor and transient,” and that few patients sought medical care. This mirage is quite easy to create when you just simply deny causality between the injections and the adverse events and deaths.  Similarly with Lyme/MSIDS, the CDC uses it’s own study to stamp out any threat to their narrative that COVID ‘vaccines’ are ‘safe and effective’ and are the only recourse despite effective treatments that are heavily censored and banned. CDC’s Walensky belatedly admitted that they relied too heavily of ‘vaccines’ as a “cure all,” suspiciously right before mid-term elections.

Reality; however, paints a far different picture:

“They coded the deaths.  They said, “Did the vaccine cause [death] or was there some other cause?  86% of the time, there’s no other cause.  50% of the deaths occur within two days of taking the shot; 80% occur within a week.”  ~ Dr McCullough

Now in March, 2022 we find that a CDC peer-reviewed study shows that COVID injection DEATHS represent 1.3% of reported side-effects and 6.6% were serious. This of course led the CDC to quietly adjust their metrics for measuring COVID risk, purposely manipulating to make it appear the pandemic was easing up.  We went from 90% of the country in high-risk red zones to overnight, having less than 30% of the country in high-risk orange zones.  The CDC constantly manipulates and withholds data.  Remember that historically VAERS only gets about a 1% capture rate.

But the CDC is far from alone.  For decades the FDA has allowed drug companies to cherry-pick data to get approval for drugs. When a drug fails, Big Pharma only publishes papers with positive results and sweeps the negative ones under the rug.  A 2013 book settles the point conclusively: industry research only gives positive results.  And this well-written article in Frontiers states that Big Pharma takes advantage of medical science by doing it’s own research and smoothly integrating it with medical science.  This has been blatantly seen in the era of COVID.

  • FDA “cherry-picked” evidence to push cloned-animal foods, and downplayed evidence of health risks.
  • The FDA has been accused of using back-channels to get expensive, ineffective drugs approved.

So what about industry researched “vaccines” and “FDA approved” COVID treatments?”

Some examples:

  • The FDA has been accused of being “willfully ignorant” about ivermectin and that global studies prove efficacy against COVID. A recent study confirms ivermectin beats out 9 other treatments.
  • The FDA ignores data and gives Pfizer shots a favorable conclusion. Number of doses (denominator) was redacted, preventing any computation of rates and risks.  Isn’t that convenient?  This also means the FDA may be in contempt of court.
  • AstraZeneca has been accused of including “outdated information” in touting effectiveness.  An independent panel scolded the company for “cherry-picking” data.
  • A pathologist has called out the FDA for “glossing over” potential risks of an mRNA vaccine while concealing its true efficacy. This same pathologist filed a “stay of action” against the FDA for using faulty PCR tests in the “vaccine” trials.
  • San Diego scientists call out FDA Commissioner over “cherry-picked” COVID plasma data, and that support for the treatment is unfounded.
  •  Gilead‘s expensive but toxic remdesivir, used widely in the “Fauci death protocol”, is ineffective for COVID, but somehow managed to still become FDA approved.
  •  Regarding boosters, the FDA’s been accused of performing hat tricks, as they made the decision with NO DATA.  Further, every member of the ACIP which reviews the level of evidence to vote for boosters has conflicts of interest with vaccine manufacturers.
  • In this article we learn that Children’s Health Defense Fund has filed a lawsuit against the FDA due to the fact you cannot have a vaccine that is both an emergency use product and a licensed product at the same time. That’s against the law, but the government has done it anyway. The request for an injunction was initially thrown out, but CHD is still pursuing the case.
I’m sure there are thousands of more examples, but it’s laughable that the FDA is worried about “cherry-picking” when it does it with abandon.
Let us never forget that when Pfizer applied for FDA approval, they were completely aware of almost 159,000 adverse events but wanted this fact sealed for 75 years.

And these adverse events are not little fevers with some itching or swelling:

  • Acute kidney injury
  • Acute flaccid myelitis
  • Anti-sperm antibody positive
  • Brain stem embolism
  • Brain stem thrombosis
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiac failure
  • Cardiac ventricular thrombosis
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Central nervous system vasculitis
  • Death neonatal
  • Deep vein thrombosis
  • Encephalitis brain stem
  • Encephalitis hemorrhagic
  • Frontal lobe epilepsy
  • Foaming at mouth
  • Epileptic psychosis
  • Facial paralysis
  • Fetal distress syndrome
  • Gastrointestinal amyloidosis
  • Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
  • Hashimoto’s encephalopathy
  • Hepatic vascular thrombosis
  • Herpes zoster reactivation
  • Immune-mediated hepatitis
  • Interstitial lung disease
  • Jugular vein embolism
  • Juvenile myoclonic epilepsy
  • Liver injury
  • Low birth weight
  • Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
  • Myocarditis, neonatal seizure
  • Pancreatitis, pneumonia
  • Stillbirth
  • Tachycardia
  • Temporal lobe epilepsy
  • Testicular autoimmunity
  • Thrombotic cerebral infarction
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Venous thrombosis neonatal
  • Vertebral artery thrombosis.
  • There were 1,246 other medical conditions following the shots, over 25,000 of which were nervous system disorders, 17,000 musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders, and 14,000 gastrointestinal disorders

The fly in the ointment on COVID shot efficacy

Regarding efficacy, please remember that ‘vaccine’ manufacturers did a ‘slight of hand’ to obtain their highly touted positive results: they simply discarded absolute risk.  When absolute risk is included, COVID injections are 1% or less effective.  They also purposely omitted those with natural immunity because those who have recovered from COVID are at risk for a hyperimmune response after “vaccination,” and some WILL actually DIE.  Big Pharma didn’t want that fact to be exposed.  These jabs lose any effectiveness they might have within weeks and don’t work at all for variants.

Dr. Cole states that whatever small benefit (0.345%) the injections had early on during the middle of an epidemic with a fast-moving virus is completely diminished by the fact natural immunity and early treatments, that are far more effective than “vaccines”, were completely neglected and suppressed.

Many do not know that the flu shot is also a “bust” and has been found to be only 16% effective against the predominant strain.

Further, the COVID shots:

Further, they are using outdated population estimates that grossly under count the actual number of the unvaccinated, which translates into inflated estimates of COVID cases.  Second, they appear to be counting every person for whom they cannot verify vaccination stated as unvaccinated which also translates into overstatement of COVID cases in the unvaccinated and the understatement of cases for the ‘vaccinated.‘ Go here for an excellent read on how public health agencies are using fake science to support their narrative. The CDC was recently called out on this.

When all of these maneuvers fail, they simply hide data by not publishing it, or delete it altogether.  Poof! It’s gone!  A few examples:

  • A German insurance company fires CEO for releasing COVID shot injury data and then scrubs the data from the website.  The released data suggests ‘authorities’ are significantly under reporting injuries.
  • The NIH got Forbes to simply delete a reporter from their employment for simply writing a factual article about Fauci.
  • A FOIA request showed emails with Fauci and NIH head, Collins, communicating the need for a quick and devastating published take-down of the Great Barrington Declaration. They conspired with the media to this effect and a day later Google began censoring search results for it.  Both men have gone on record stating the Declaration is “dangerous,” “ridiculous,” and “total nonsense.” Mainstream and social media giants then began a smear campaign against it and the epidemiologists behind it, calling the Harvard, Oxford, and Stanford doctors “fringe,” despite the fact 928,000 have signed the declaration.
  • At least 12 mysterious deaths of CDC scientists. Could they have been deleted for knowing too much or threatening to speak up?

These corrupt ‘authorities’ will blame anything but the obvious thing.  Further, 6 months does not even begin to answer questions about safety and efficacy on a fast-tracked, experimental – never before used in humans gene therapy that is linked to more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.

Lets review some facts:
  • FDA FOIA data shows over 1,200 deaths in the first 3 MONTHS of the COVID jab and TENS OF THOUSANDS of adverse events.  Please remember in 1976 the Swine flu program was halted in nine states after just 3 deaths.  The entire program ended with only 20% of the population vaccinated due to reports of Guillain-Barre.
  • One in nine adolescents suffered an adverse event.
  • Myocarditis risk is higher from COVID shots than from COVID. It’s three times higher using Pfizer.
  • While a multitude of experts stated the ‘pandemic’ was over a year ago, the US Senate just passed a bill to end COVID, which will likely be voted against by the House of Representatives and vetoed by Biden. None of this is shocking as an internal memo shows Biden and the CDC are following advice from a public opinion research firm, not science.
  • Bought out public health ‘experts’ have detailed a frightening plan focusing on 12 key areas for living with COVID:
    • expensive MERV 13 filtration or HEPA filters in all public buildings which should be monitored and publicly graded. (imagine the expense and power-grabs if this goes into effect)
    • another “Warp Speed” program with advanced purchase agreements and incentives (think billions to Big Pharma & our government) to produce an oral antiviral cocktail, despite the fact treatments already exist that are cheap and effective.
    • keep pushing “vaccines” despite proof the COVID jabs are worthless,  dangerous, and don’t stop transmission, infection, hospitalization, or death.
    • More testing, despite it’s utter failure. They want to track, track, and track some more – further eroding individual freedom.
    • Under the auspice of “Long COVID” they want a national research program that includes health, “vaccination,” and sociodemograhic data. Another tyrannical power grab for your personal information which isn’t anybody’s business but yours.
    • Rather than admit COVID “vaccines” are worthless and dangerous, they want to address workforce shortages with a “pool of flexible healthcare workers” rather than rehire workers who chose to forego the shots. (An obvious breach of our constitutional rights & a form of segregation)
    • They selfishly acknowledge health inequity, yet refuse to acknowledge the medical apartheid of illegal “vaccine” mandates and “vaccine” passports.
Let’s just chalk up the proposed plan as yet more of what we’ve experienced in the past two years.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

HIV/AIDS is Back & AIDS Researchers Are Suddenly & Mysteriously Dying

https://thecovidblog.com/2022/02/28/move-over-cancer-mrna-injections-are-respawning-hiv-aids-while-numerous-aids-researchers-are-suddenly-and-mysteriously-dying/

Move over cancer: mRNA injections are respawning HIV/AIDS around the globe, while numerous AIDS researchers are suddenly and mysteriously dying

admin

TheCOVIDBlog.com

The face of evil is ever-present.

Two people have been talked about many times on The COVID Blog™ – Dr. Kary Mullis and Dr. Luc Montagnier.

Dr. Mullis is the Nobel Prize-winning biochemist who invented the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. He is also known for his ongoing feud with Fauci in the 1980 and 1990s. Dr. Mullis made clear in the early 1990s that PCR is not a test and can essentially find anything in any living being if you run enough cycles.

He would have gladly challenged Fauci to debates about COVID-19, and that his invention is not a COVID-19 test. But Dr. Mullis mysteriously died on August 7, 2019 at age 74, just a few months before the COVID-19 agenda commenced. Mainstream media barely recognized him or his death, despite his contributions to humanity. This will be an ongoing theme throughout this article.

Mainstream media coverage of Dr. Luc Montagnier’s February 8 death was different than Dr. Mullis’, but with the same motives. The BBC, for instance, described Dr. Montagnier as a “French virologist credited as a co-discoverer of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).” That’s an interesting and disingenuous way of saying Dr. Montagnier created the HIV virus in a lab and patented it in 1989. In fact the very first sentence in the abstract of the patent refers to HIV as “the invention.”  (See link for article)

____________________

**Comment**

This is a deep dive into history, but is imperative to understand as it all relates today.

SUMMARY (although I highly recommend reading the entire article with accompanying videos): 

  • While there was contention between Dr. Robert Gallo and Montagnier as to who was the inventor of HIV, Montagnier was given credit, and won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2008.
  • The article states HIV, a biological weapon, killed countless Africans and Western homosexuals.
  • While AIDS first presented in homosexual males around 1979-80, as the ‘greatest health scare of the 20th century’, authorities marketed it as being caused by the green monkey, which spread around the world from Africa – similarly to the initial narrative that COVID was a “black disease.” The problem with this narrative is it didn’t appear on the African continent until 1983.
  • Montagnier went from being a darling to the global elite to a pariah by stating the mRNA and viral vector DNA injections cause COVID variants, and urging people to reject the shots.
  • AIDS mostly disappeared after the patent expired in 2005 until its recent resurrection and rebooting in 2022.
  • AIDS, which destroys the immune system, sounds very much like ADE after COVID shots.
  • The article gives a detailed account of life-long bureaucrat, Dr. Fauci, who went to work for NIAD in 1968, immediately after medical residency. The man has never treated a single patient. He is also guilty of funding horrific experiments on children, dogs, and other animals.
    • Fauci was appointed chief of NIAD in 1980, just in time for AIDS, where the fear-mongering propaganda began in earnest. He warned that routine contact can spread it. (I remember hearing this vividly as a child)
    • Less than 2 months later he flip-flopped and stated this notion was preposterous. He did this again recently with masks, but both admissions were too little too late as fear dominated, and power-hungry politicians made edicts based on his faulty advice.
    • Fauci, aka the “Tephlon man,” because nothing ever sticks to him, was rewarded by being promoted to director of NIAD, and has remained since, despite serious allegations.
    • Similarly with COVID, experts began punching holes in the AIDS narrative. Dr. Robert Strecker discovered by accident that HIV was created in a lab, AIDS is spread by deliberate infection (e.g. Hepatitis B vaccines), pills, water or something else, and kills everyone who contracts it, but that it’s rarely (if ever) transmitted via semen or saliva.
    • The Feds and researchers laughed at Strecker as general consensus believed only 10% died from AIDS, and they totally swallowed the “green monkey” narrative.
    • Undaunted, Strecker created “The Bio-Attack Alert” and sent a copy to every governor, the White House, FBI, CIA, and members of Congress.  He also created The Strecker Memorandum in 1988 for public viewing on VHS which provided proof that AIDS did not come from nature and is in fact a biological weapon.  All of this is eerily similar to the COVID narrative.
    • Dr. Strecker’s brother, Ted, was found dead on August 11, 1988, just a few weeks after The Strecker Memorandum was released, but the official narrative ruled it a suicide.  This also is eerily similar to what’s happened to those exposing the truth about COVID.
    • Dr. Strecker, able to read the hand-writing on the wall, became silent on the issue and died in a car accident at age 71.  Both Ted and Dr. Strecker have been erased from history as being AIDS whistleblowers.
    • With the renegades now deleted, profitable treatments emerged that were highly toxic. This too is a similar refrain for COVID.
    • The FDA’s approval of AZT in a record setting 20 months is also similar to the experimental, fast-tracked mRNA shots for COVID, both of which bypass the regulatory oversight and transparency of traditional drugs and “vaccines.” Predictably, legislation was put in place protecting manufacturers from liability.  How convenient for them.
    • Fauci loved the limelight then – promoting toxic AZT just as much as much as he loves it now promoting ineffective, unsafe, and unneeded COVID shots. Again, “mandating” any medical procedure is not only illegal & unconstitutional, but the “vaccination” campaign has been proven to actually drives viral immune escape (cause variants), severe infections, and even death, and has ZERO effect on mortality.
    • Homosexual rights activist and Harvard research analyst John Lauritsen tried warning about the flawed and fraudulent clinical trials that led to FDA approval of AZT, just as experts are desperately trying to warn the public about the CDC withholding and skewing data, utilizing flawed and fraudulent clinical trials that led to FDA approval of experimental mRNA shots, as well as “approved” treatments for COVID and others, and exposing fraudulent research used to squash competition. But, history seems to repeat itself and apparently nobody’s listening.
    • AZT, BTW, cost $8K for a year’s supply in the 90’s, which is equivalent to $17K today – the most expensive drug in U.S. history at the time.  Again, it seems history repeats itself with expensive “approved” COVID treatments. There’s no way to know how much money GSK made from AZT or how many actually died from taking it, but homosexual activists state deaths are as high as 300,000 Americans, many of whom were asymptomatic who got deathly ill only after taking the drug.
  • Indian Researchers were forced to withdraw a Jan. 2020 published a study that found “Uncanny similarit[ies] of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1,” due to “vested interests.” One of the researchers tweeted in May 2021 that they were right the whole time about COVID being man-made and containing HIV genome sequences.  This study also had to be deleted as it would have nipped the plandemic in the bud before it even began.
  • Then in Oct. 2020, “Researchers Warn Some Covid-19 Vaccines Could Increase Risk Of HIV Infection.” Less than two months later the Australian government scrapped plans to buy 50 million doses because “several trial participants returned false positive HIV test results.” All of this completely buried by MSM.
  • Feb. 2022, Science reports A highly virulent variant of HIV-1 circulating in the Netherlands.  Ironically, Moderna is now testing a new HIV mRNA “vaccine” in humans.  What perfect timing.
  • The article then lists many coincidental deaths of HIV/AIDS researchers.
  • Previous CDC director Dr. Robert Redfield was also a player in the HIV racket as he attempted to create a HIV vaccine based on flawed and faulty research which led to an investigation for scientific fraud and misconduct.  The government and government employees, which directly own and profit from patents on organisms, testing, vaccines, and treatments predictably concluded there was no misconduct afterall.

The question that begs for an answer: why are we trusting the same people and organizations who have duped the public again and again?

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses