Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

And An Honorary Award Goes to Dr. Campbell

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/john-campbells-list-of-studies-

John Campbell’s List of Studies On Natural Immunity

He is Amazing, and Should Be Given an Honorary Everything.

I’ve watched John Campbell review all things related to COVID-19 since the beginning of the pandemic. He has proven to be 100% unbiased and willing to represent the evidence as well as he understands it.

His first video on Coronavirus aired Jan 26, 2020. He now has 1.2M viewers on YouTube – with endless videos, one or two per day, he has covered nearly every aspect of COVID-19 and SARS-CoV-2.

In this video, he reviews the scientific evidence of natural immunity, which he says “seems good and long-lasting and cheap, lots of evidence below.”

He expansion collection of links and annotations are provided below for those looking for resources on evidence of natural immunity.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00676-9/fulltext

Biological studies

Dan et al (2021) Science, Immunological memory to SARS-CoV-2 assessed for up to 8 months after infection.

https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abf4063

95% of participants tested retained immune memory at about 6 months after having COVID-19

More than 90% of participants had CD4+ T-cell memory at 1 month,

and 6–8 months after having COVID-19

Wang et al (2021) Science, Ultrapotent antibodies against diverse and highly transmissible SARS-CoV-2 variants

https://www.science.org/doi/full/10.1126/science.abh1766

Previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, with an ancestral variant produce antibodies that cross-neutralize emerging variants of concern with high potency

Epidemiological studies

Hansen et al (2021) Lancet, Assessment of protection against reinfection with SARS-CoV-2 among 4 million PCR-tested individuals in Denmark in 2020: a population-level observational study

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00575-4/fulltext

People who had had COVID-19 previously were around 80·5% protected against reinfection

Pilz et al (2021) European Journal of Clinical Investigation, SARS-CoV-2 re-infection risk in Austria

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13520

Sheehan et al (2021) Clinical Infectious Diseases, Reinfection rates among patients who previously tested positive for COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/73/10/1882/6170939

Shrestha et al (2021) Preprint, Necessity of COVID-19 vaccination in previously infected individuals

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.01.21258176v3

Retrospective cohort study in the USA,

People who had had COVID-19 previously were 100% protected against reinfection

Gazit et al (2021) Preprint, Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.24.21262415v1

Kojima et al (2021) Preprint, Incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection among previously infected or vaccinated employees

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.03.21259976v2

Laboratory staff routinely screened for SARS-CoV-2, people who had had COVID-19 previously were 100% protected against reinfection

Clinical studies

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(21)00675-9/fulltext

Large, multicenter, prospective cohort study

Previous COVID-19 diagnosis, 84% decreased risk of infection

Letizia et al (2021) Lancet, Respiratory Medicine, SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity and subsequent infection risk in healthy young adults: a prospective cohort study

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanres/article/PIIS2213-2600(21)00158-2/fulltext

Prospective cohort of US Marines.

Seropositive young adults were 82% protected against reinfection

Adnan et al (2021) Clinical Infectious Diseases, Reinfection With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Patients Undergoing Serial Laboratory Testing

https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/74/2/294/6251701

N = 9,119, serial tests

Reinfection rates, 0.7%

So

Risk of repeat SARS-CoV-2 infection decreased by 80·5–100% among those who had had COVID-19

Protection from reinfection is strong and persists for more than 10 months of follow-up, (Hansen et al 2021 Lancet)

Turner, et al Nature, SARS-CoV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells in humans

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03647-4?amp%3Bcode=7bafb609-23c2-4665-804b

Madhuumita et al, Plos One, T cell response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0245532

SARS-CoV-2 infection induces specific and durable T-cell immunity,

Nina et al, (2020) Nature, SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell immunity in cases of COVID-19 and SARS, and uninfected controls

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2550-z?flip=true

Memory B-cell response to SARS-CoV-2 evolves between 1·3 and 6·2 months after infection, which is consistent with longer-term protection

Some people who have recovered from COVID-19 might not benefit from COVID-19 vaccination

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.04.20.21255670v1

One study found that previous COVID-19 was associated with increased adverse events following vaccination with Pfizer

https://www.journalofinfection.com/article/S0163-4453(21)00277-2/fulltext

In Switzerland, proof of recovered infection, in the past 12 months are considered equally protected as fully vaccinated,

https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/news/switzerland-plans-to-extend-covid-certificate-requirement-until-mid-november/

Thank you, John!

___________________

**Comment**

I attempted to find a graphic of natural immunity but Google wouldn’t let me.  While not shocking, this is quite telling as natural immunity has been acknowledged from the beginning of time but is being downplayed, ignored, and frankly rewritten as only coming from “vaccines.”  This is intentional and you need to be aware of it.

This article explains how natural immunity to coronavirus lasts a year and perhaps a life-time, and that cells that retain a memory of the virus persist in the bone marrow and may churn out antibodies whenever needed. Natural immunity is long lasting, robust, and better than vaccinesFurther, effective treatments makes the need for a vaccine null and void, which of course is why they are ridiculing and attacking doctors who are educating others about these treatments.

  • Recently a Johns Hopkins professors states to “ignore the CDC” due to their refusal to recognize natural immunity from previous infection. The WHO also recently changed the definition of herd immunity to now only come from vaccines, essentially rewriting hundreds of years of scientific understanding.
  • There is ample evidence that those who have already had COVID should NOT get “vaccinated.” Dr. Hooman Noorchashm has repeatedly warned the FDA that “clear and present danger” exists for those who have had COVID-19 and subsequently get vaccinated due to viral antigens that remain in the body after a person is naturally infected; the immune response reactivated by the COVID-19 vaccine may trigger inflammation in tissues where the viral antigens exist. An international survey of 2,002 people found that people who had previously had COVID-19 experienced “significantly increased incidence and severity” of side effects after the COVID-19 vaccine
  • It’s important to remember that COVID injections are part of a grand experiment where final data is unknown. These are experimental, fast-tracked injections that do not stop transmission or infection and have not undergone rigorous testing, have already proven to be the most dangerous injections in the history of VAERS.

Reactivated Infections: A Possible Piece of the Chronic Illness Puzzle

https://www.globallymealliance.org/blog/reactivated-infections-a-possible-piece-of-the-chronic-illness-puzzle

Did you know that old infections can get reactivated due to COVID-19 or tick-borne illness?

For almost two years now, comparisons have been drawn between long-haul COVID-19 and long-haul tick-borne illness. In addition to many overlapping symptoms including persistent fatiguebrain fog, and pain, questions about the cause of these long-haul symptoms are also similar: Is it ongoing infection? Is it a dysregulated immune system? Is it inflammation? The answers may not be mutually exclusive.

There may also be another factor at play: old infections that get reactivated as a result of acute COVID-19 or tick-borne illness.

Many of us have dormant infections in our bodies. Those of us who had chicken pox as kids still carry varicella-zoster virus. For most of us, that virus stays dormant forever, but for some—particularly those who are immunocompromised or who suffer extreme stress—the virus can reactivate later as shingles.[i]

Another example is Epstein-Barr virus, which causes mononucleosis. While 95% of adults probably carry this virus, for many it is always dormant, and they don’t even know they have it [ii]. Others, like myself, are not so lucky. My own case of infectious mononucleosis dragged on, slipping into chronic active Epstein-Barr virus. Though my acute symptoms of swollen glands and sore throat cleared up, fatigue, and low-grade fever persisted for two years. I later learned that my body could not adequately fight Epstein-Barr because I also had underlying, untreated tick-borne infections including Lyme disease, babesiosis, ehrlichiosis, and possible bartonella. I spent another several years battling those tick-borne illnesses into remission, including one shattering relapse. So focused was on I treating those infections—which also caused fatigue and fever—that I sometimes forgot I had Epstein-Barr virus.

But the body does not forget. A few years ago, after a particularly stressful period in my life, I had a minor flare-up of symptoms. Though not bedridden again, I was more tired than usual. Long-gone joint and muscle aches returned. I panicked that my tick-borne illnesses were back in full force. And while they were reactivated a bit, tests revealed that what was really flaring was Epstein-Barr virus. I’d forgotten that the virus that had originally sent me to bed all those years ago could come back, too.

That episode was an important wake-up call to me, and I hope it will be for other Lyme warriors too: not all symptoms we have are Lyme-related. We have to remember what else our bodies harbor, what else can reactivate when our immune systems are down.

On the flip side, we also have to remember that Lyme can be a relapsing illness, as my doctor describes it. Research proves that Lyme bacteria can persist after antibiotic treatment. This means that the bacteria can lie dormant, and slowly start replicating at a later point, particularly if the body is under some kind of stress. “High level stress is like walking into a minefield of ticks,” my doctor once said. Stress can be external, like from a tough job situation or a hard breakup. It can also be physical, like from an acute illness such a cold or COVID-19.

Luckily, my own long-haul case of COVID-19 did not cause a flare-up of any of my underlying infections. My doctors hope this means that as I’ve grown healthier over the years, my body has become more resilient. But other COVID-19 long-haulers have experienced reactivation of other illnesses, like the patients described in “For These 17 COVID Long Haulers, Reactivated Viruses May Be to Blame” on verywellhealth.com.

For all of us long-haulers, it’s important that we don’t get tunnel vision about the illnesses we deal with on a day-to-day basis. We must also consider other, older infections in our bodies, and how they might impact recovery.

[i] https://www.verywellhealth.com/long-covid-latent-viral-reactivations-5205269?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=shareurlbuttons&fbclid=IwAR3FaE8sJJGxhShKcWzI3f0EKbkTml8QzQdnh742oVIsSsMLPlqnD4QXXlg#citation-5

[ii] Womack J, Jimenez M. Common questions about infectious mononucleosisAm Fam Physician. 2015;91(6):372-376

Writer

Jennifer Crystal

Opinions expressed by contributors are their own. Jennifer Crystal is a writer and educator in Boston. Her work has appeared in local and national publications including Harvard Health Publishing and The Boston Globe. As a GLA columnist for over six years, her work on GLA.org has received mention in publications such as The New Yorker, weatherchannel.com, CQ Researcher, and ProHealth.com. Jennifer is a patient advocate who has dealt with chronic illness, including Lyme and other tick-borne infections. Her memoir about her medical journey is forthcoming. Contact her via email below.

Email: lymewarriorjennifercrystal@gmail.com

_______________

**Comment**

Many avoid stating it, but vaccines can also be a physical stress that can reactivate latent infections.  I’ve witnessed this personally in Lyme/MSIDS patients who have had symptoms come roaring back after getting a vaccine.  Vaccines are not without risk and for Lyme/MSIDS patients they pose a significant risk due to an already dysfunctional immune system and an overwhelming amount of inflammation.

Please see: 

Another Embalmer Speaks: 93% Have Deadly Clots Caused by COVID Shots

https://rumble.com/vuqk1w-explosive-embalmer-reveals-93-of-cases-have-deadly-clots-caused-by-the-vax  Video Here (Interview length approx. 1 hour, but at least listen to the first 10 min)

Embalmer reveals 93% of cases have deadly clots caused by the COVID vax

Feb. 12, 2022

Steve Kirsch interviews Anna Foster, an embalmer with 11 years of experience in Carrollton, MO. She speaks out for the first time in this exclusive interview. The big news is that she found the unusual clots in 93% of the last 30 people who she embalmed. The clots are only associated with people who have been “vaccinated”. This was only observed after the “vaccines” rolled out.

This is a massive health issue since it is killing a huge number of people. All her embalmer friends have noticed it and have never seen it before in their careers.

The clots are life threatening and are almost certainly the root cause of death in these people.

The doctors and coroners in her area are completely unaware of the problem.

When 93% of people who die are killed by a single cause, this merits immediate investigation.

However, I am certain that the CDC and all legacy media will continue to ignore this story.

Therefore, I will continue to interview more and more embalmers who will relate the same story as you will learn in this video.

I am hopeful that after 100 embalmers say similar things, someone in Congress will take action on what is likely the most serious preventable health problem in our nation’s history.

See my Substack article on this at: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/exclusive-embalmer-reveals-93-of

_________________

For More:

FDA’s Continued Assault on NAC and Promising Pushback

N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a powerful antioxidant which contains the amino acid cysteine, a precursor to glutathione, that was approved as a drug in 1963 and has been widely used as a nutritional supplement since it is not found in food.  It is also used in prescription form as an antidote for acetaminiphen-induced toxicity as well as for depression, precancers, HIV & AIDS, to alleviate cancer treatment side-effects, and as a mucolytic agent for upper respiratory conditions such as COVID. 

The FDA abruptly decided in 2020 that NAC should suddenly require a doctor’s prescription and issued a warning to seven companies who were illegally selling hangover products with NAC in them.  Amazon then completely stopped selling it.

The timing of this abrupt decision is suspicious at best, since NAC very well may help lower the risk of COVID and the fact those with glutathione deficiencies have worse outcomes.  Many doctors have recommended NAC as part of an early at-home treatment that is safe, cheap, and effective.  Within this article is a video where a pulmonologist explains NAC is necessary to reduce the oxidative stress associated with severe COVID and thus may significantly impact the sales of antiviral drugs.  Drugs, in fact, which our conflict-riddled public health ‘authorities’ have a stake in.

Natural Products Insider reports, the warning letters stated that NAC could not be “lawfully marketed in dietary supplements because it was first studied as a drug in 1963.” The Council for Responsible Nutrition (CRN) sent a letter in December 2020 to the FDA’s Office of Dietary Supplement Programs describing the position as “legally invalid.”

To appear reasonable, the FDA announced they wanted more information on how NAC has been marketed as a dietary supplement.

Quick to respond, numerous associations have submitted proof to the FDA of numerous NAC-containing products sold pre-DSHEA and that the FDA is misapplying the prior drug-restriction to NAC, and that it can’t be applied retroactively from the date of DSHEA’s enactment.  They also submitted comments, countering FDA’s safety concerns, noting that NAC has been in use for decades and that FDA had access in that time to its own Adverse Event Reporting System, to manufacturing facility inspections, and other tools, as well as data from publicly available research studies conducted on NAC or NAC-containing formulations. CRN pointed to data provided by Pure Encapsulations, a brand marketed by Nestlé Health Science, which includes nine years of adverse event data for the company’s supplement containing NAC:

  • From 2013 to the present day, the adverse event rate per unit sold of NAC-containing products was only 0.002%
  • those adverse events were mild and resolved on their own
  • Sevo Nutraceuticals reported fewer than 10 adverse events for approximately 500,000 unites sold

In a press release, Megan Olsen, CRN’s VP and Associate General Counsel, commented:

“The agency’s continued failure to address the singular legal issue on the table is inexplicable. Their refusal to act is causing harm to consumers and businesses.”

A press release summarized The United Natural Products Alliance’s (UNPA) position on the matter as of January 25, 2022:

  • The FDA, in attempting to exclude NAC from the dietary supplement market, is acting outside of its statutory jurisdiction and authority.
  • UNPA provided definitive evidence of pre-DSHEA use of NAC – it is an ODI (Old Dietary Ingredient), NAC is safe, and there is broad agreement on this.
  • The UNPA NAC Working Group will pursue this important issue until a proper outcome is reached, which is recognition of NAC as a lawful ODI and FDA abandons its misguided retro lookback policy.

The FDA appears to be in hot-water these days and is embroiled in yet another fiasco. The FDA has long been accused of corruption, and ties to Big Pharma which has resulted in unsafe pharmaceuticals. Interestingly, while it approves and promotes toxic drugs like remdesivir and COVID injections which aren’t vaccines and have caused more adverse reactions and death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS, it squashes safe supplements and proven drugs like NAC, vitamins D, C, zinc, and ivermectin which could improve cases and remove the need altogether for COVID injections. If you have less than 4 minutes, go here to listen to Dr. Kory passionately explain the situation. It literally brought tears to my eyes. Doctors who are truly attempting to help patients are bullied, censored, and shouted down. Kory’s frustration is tangible.

The current top-down, “one-sized fits all” approach to medicine puts everyone into a 4-cornered box regardless of medical history, health status, and individual needs. I highlight how this current dangerous, singular approach, which also includes mainstream media and Big Pharma colluding with public health officials, is removing our precious medical freedoms in this article, as well as is causing a shortage of medical professionals in the U.S. Front-line workers, who were heroes a year ago but are currently being bullied and summarily dismissed without a job or pay simply for not taking an experimental, fast-tracked gene therapy that doesn’t stop infection or transmission.

Unless we educate others and speak and act now it may be too late to roll this back, and it will restrict Lyme/MSIDS patients more than they already are. Mark my words.

Despite all Evidence, ‘Powers That Be’ Continue to Push COVID Shots on Children: Sign the Petition

Let’s review the facts:
The abrupt about-face has caused many to speculate that the narrative is crumbling, and there is a scheduled end to the ‘pandemic,’
Some more facts:
  • COVID injections have utterly failed to stop transmission and infection.
  • The promise of COVID injections lessening severity and death is also a ruse as countries adopting mass ‘vaccination’ campaigns have been hit hardest with severe COVID.
  • The COVID shots have caused enhancement of variants, are dragging out the ‘pandemic,’ and have caused ADE, and more adverse reactions and death than another other vaccine in the history of VAERS.
  • Boosters wane quickly with steeply declining protection against emergency department visits as well as hospitalization during Omicron, proving they don’t lessen severity.
  • Warnings on boosters, with an health agency stating it looks like they lower the immune system.
Yet, despite these facts, the ‘powers that be’ are hell-bent on getting these experimental, fast-tracked injections into the arms of babies and children.

In light of these facts, the important question to ask is why?

Regarding children, a study by the CDC shows hospitalizations among children during the ‘pandemic’ actually declined. 

The study split the children into three age groups:

  • 0-4, overall ER visits decreased by 51% during 2020, 2021, and 2022 compared with 2019
  • 5-11 overall ER visits decreased by 22%
  • 12-17 overall ER visits decreased by 23%

Important points:

“COVID-19 visits predominated across all pediatric ages; visits for other respiratory illnesses mostly declined. Number and proportion of visits increased for certain injuries (e.g., firearm injuries, self-harm, and drug poisonings), some chronic diseases, and behavioral health concerns, with variations by age group.”

So once again, we are talking about collateral damage caused by lockdowns, not COVID.

Also important to note is that concerns about higher COVID-19 hospital admissions have been refuted.  Even Fauci, White House pandemic adviser, stated that COVID-19 cases among children were being overcounted at hospitals as kids are automatically tested when they are admitted. And the COVID PCR yields notoriously high false positive rates.  COVID is over counted everywhere.  Our corrupt government health authorities are guilty of committing egregious errors in counting COVID  cases and deaths.

In December 2021, Pfizer announced the 2-dose series wasn’t successful and did not provide immunity in 2-5 year olds, and they began trials for a 3-dose series. Despite this failure, the FDA asked Pfizer to submit an application for authorization in this age group.  Even former FDA Commissioner and current Pfizer board member, Scott Gottlieb, admits not enough children under five have COVID to even test the “vaccine.”  What does that tell you?  Interestingly, Gottlieb was not interviewed as a guest, but as a “CNBC contributor,” which means he also works for corporate media, demonstrating yet again the revolving door between public health, Big Pharma, and mainstream media.  But, damn the torpedoes, it’s full-speed ahead!

This means VRBPAC will be voting on authorization for a vaccine in our youngest, most vulnerable children already knowing it is not effective, and without safety data.

Eric Rubin, a member of the FDA’s reviewing committee said this was “very unusual” and that “FDA doesn’t seem to be immune to political pressures.” Jeffrey Zientz, White House Covid-19 Response Coordinator told the press the administration is ready to “hit the ground running” to vaccinate infants and toddlers as soon as they get the authorization.

Why the jab when, according to data published by the CDC, 99.99815% of children who contract COVID-19 survive. And, children are not even the spreaders. There are no long-term safety studies for this age group, or any age group, for the mRNA covid vaccines because the placebo group was “unblinded” and allowed to get the vaccine. Plus there are 36,167 adverse events reported to VAERS as of February 4, 2022 in children under 18. Source

Besides the fact there is NO emergency in this age group, and even Fauci admitting that hospitalizations attributed to COVID in kids are probably not due to COVID, the likelihood that the injections will prevent a SINGLE case of COVID-19 in adults is nearly ZERO.

Go here to listen to what an Israeli immunologist recently wrote in an open letter which states authorities have “failed miserably,” by not acknowledging that young people have a very low risk regarding COVID. Another Israeli scientist said a research paper she wrote on serious adverse reactions to the injections was squashed.

So up until now, the FDA has illegally approved all other Pfizer COVID-19 “vaccines” by simply rubber-stamping Pfizer’s own data which is hidden from the public, and recently Pfizer quietly added language warning that ‘unfavorable preclinical, clinical, or safety data’ may impact business. As Zerohedge points out, Pfizer which just forecast $54 billion for 2022 sales, appears to be anticipating some bad news and that bad news centers around disclosures of unfavorable safety data. It also probably doesn’t help that a whistleblower is pressing forward with a lawsuit against Pfizer despite the U.S. government declining to investigate the matter. It too centers around lack of safety, adverse events either not being reported correctly or being reported at all, and informed consent errors – among other things.

Dr. Weiler states that there have been a number of important breaches of ethical and legal standards involved in the activities to render the data being considered by the FDA including:

  • it is illegal to conduct medical experiments and enroll people in a clinical trial unless there is a direct potential personal benefit to them via their participation. Children do not benefit from COVID injections, and the FDA’s risk-benefit assessment was deeply flawed:
    • it failed to account for the large proportion of children who already had COVID, recovered, and have natural immunity which is superior to ‘vaccine’ induced immunity, which an FDA senior advisor admitted would result in a 45% reduction of all the benefits in the FDA’s risk-benefit analyses
    • using the FDA’s risk-benefit analysis and conservatively adjusting for those with natural immunity, the risk of hospitalization from ‘vaccine’ related heart inflammation in 5 to 11 year-old boys is greater than the number of COVID-19 hospitalizations prevented by vaccination.
    • while 118 hospitalizations are prevented by ‘vaccination’, this is at the risk of 156 vaccine related myopericarditis hospitalizations, for 5-11-year-old boys.
    • a Kaiser Permanente study found the actual myopericarditis incidence rate to be 208 cases per million children vaccinated, not the FDA’s usage of 106
    • the FDA used pediatric hospitalization rates as a marker for disease severity in children when a Stanford University study found that 45% of pediatric COVID-19 hospital admissions were unlikely to have been caused by SARS-CoV-2, and a CDC medical officer stated approximately 19% of younger children who were classified as COVID-19 hospital admissions were not primarily hospitalized due to COVID-19, yet the FDA did not adjust their assessment.
    • rather than using a weekly average COVID hospitalization rate since the start of the ‘pandemic’ the FDA used an arbitrary average of the four weeks prior to Sept. 11, 2021, resulting in a COVID-19 hospitalization rate of approximately 0.74 per 100,000 children, which is nearly double the average COVID-19 hospitalization rate of 0.4 per 100,000 children, further skewing the FDA’s risk-benefit analysis in favor of ‘vaccination’.
    • the FDA assumed a constant injection efficacy over 6 months, when it is well established effectiveness rapidly declines with one study showing a drop below 50% effectiveness after just five months.
    • FDA did not account for boosters after five months – each of which carries an additional risk of adverse events.
    • FDA only accounted for myocarditis/pericarditis risks following injections and didn’t account for anaphylaxis, Bell’s palsy, lymphadenopathy, among others.
    • data out of the UK has shown that individuals previously infected are more likely to experience systemic side-effects following COVID-19 vaccination.
    • FDA estimates that ‘vaccinating’ 1 million 5-11 year olds would prevent ONE COVID death, which would cost $39 million.
    • Sweden decided against recommending COVID-19 shots for children 5-11 years old as the benefits do not outweigh the risks.
    • Norway and the U.K. only recommend – not require- the jabs for high risk 5-11 year olds.
    • Netherlands and Norway admit children may not benefit from shots if they’ve already recovered from infection.
    • Experts admit COVID will be with us indefinitely.
  • post-EDU vaccine adverse event surveillance is a form of clinical research, and parents will not be provided, as required under the Common Rule and the rest of US 45-CFR-46, the opportunity to decline on the basis of refusal to participate in medical experimentation on their children.
  • If EUA is obtained, millions of children will be ‘vaccinated’ based on data from a scant 2 months of safety follow-up.
  • causality on post EUA ‘vaccine’ adverse events and deaths will be denied due to design, and not all events will be reported as there are no penalties for failing to report them.
  • studies that led to EUA for COVID shots for adults skipped Phase 2 trials, and the study for children combined all phases into one preventing the generation of data confirming prior adverse events found in the separate phases.
  • those injured or killed following the injections will not be able to file for compensation. HHS is both the defendant and the administrator, a clear violation of the separations of powers doctrine of the constitution and will provide testimony arguing against EACH and EVERY single case of which no participants will be able to access to cite precedent, including testimony and rulings from other cases. 
  • those suffering adverse reactions or death will have 12 months to link it to the injections and to file to the CICP for a “request for benefits” package, while Pfizer gets away with using just 2 months of follow-up for safety, and of course will not be liable for any damage.
  • Weiler states he’s had a peak at leaked data and is concerned:
    • they will not consider absolute risk reduction
    • about the continued futile use of injections that target extinct variants are linked to the easier spread of the virus from cell to cell in injected individuals
    •  they will arbitrarily subdivide subjective age groups to give more impressive results
    • they will use evidence of ‘immunity’ restricted to antibody production, when it is not indicative of long-term immunity, as well as the possibility of pathogenic priming

In January, 2022, parents in Switzerland protested over the deaths of their children from the Pfizer shots, and the U.K.’s Office for National Statistics (ONS) has shown that children in England and Wales who have been fully “vaccinated” with Pfizer’s mRNA COVID shot are 5,105% more likely to die from ANY cause afterward.

This is important to understand regarding ANY children, but particularly those infected with Lyme/MSIDS, have autism, or other immune dysfunctions. These children are in harms way, yet the current “top down” federal “one size fits all” approach to medicine and vaccination is killing the most vulnerable.

California lawmakers appear to agree with DHS that those opposing experimental COVID injections are “domestic terrorists,” and “steps” should be taken to deal with them. Further, California lawmakers are underhandedly fast-tracking several child ‘health’ bills that will further erode parental rights and medical freedom if passed. CA already has a mandate for children over 12, which will begin once the shots receive full approval. Bill #1 below will go much further by requiring every child K-12 to be “vaccinated” while the shots are still under EUA.

  1. forced COVID shots for school enrollment. The unvaxxed will be forced into remote learning.
  2. allowing minors to make their own ‘vaccine’ decisions without parental knowledge
  3. health care staff must complete cultural humility training, mandating a ‘refresher training course’ if they offend someone, and imposes sanctions for non-compliance

According to Karen England, Executive Director of the Capital resource Institute, these bills dismantle Constitutional rights.  She states California is treating parents like the enemy as a co-parent in a divorce, where government is the parent with custody, and parents are the visiting parent who has little say in decisions. 

Epidemiologists in an op-ed saidKids Deserve medical care driven by facts, not politics,’ and that mandating COVID shots for kids is not supported by scientific evidence and will cause more harm than good.

If you care about medical freedom, and the overbearing high-pressured sales job pushing COVID injections upon children despite all available scientific evidence, please sign and share this petition.