Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

COVID Shots & Children: 17,500% Increase in Heart Disease & The Real Reason They Want to Give Jabs to Kids

**UPDATE April, 6, 2022**

According to a FOIA request, the CDC can not provide a single confirmed COVID death in a child younger than 16.  Injecting children with this experimental gene therapy, who rarely get COVID or transmit it, have more than a 99.9% chance of surviving, and rarely get reinfected is the height of insanity.

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/17500-increase-in-heart-disease-in-children-following-covid-19-vaccines-this-is-not-rare/

17,500% Increase in Heart Disease in Children Following COVID-19 Vaccines – This is NOT Rare!

Some of the tragic stories of children’s lives destroyed following COVID-19 vaccines that we have covered here on Health Impact News.

April 2, 2022

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The number of injuries and deaths recorded in the U.S. Government’s database of Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) following COVID-19 vaccines has now reached 1.2 million cases as of the last update on Friday, April 1st. (Source.)

By way of contrast, there are 930,952 cases of injuries and deaths following all other vaccines for the previous 30+ years before the COVID-19 vaccines were issued emergency use authorizations in December of 2020. (Source.)

When you take the monthly average of cases filed in VAERS following all vaccines for the previous 30 years (360 months – 2,586 cases per month), and compare that to the monthly average of cases recorded after COVID-19 vaccines for the past 15 months (80,384 cases per month), that is an increase of 3,008%.

Heart Disease Exploding in Children Following COVID-19 Vaccines

The CDC admits that the COVID-19 vaccines are causing heart disease in young people, but they claim these cases are “rare” and so they continue to recommend the vaccines for children, as vaccine manufacturers are now petitioning the FDA to give emergency use authorizations to start injecting children below the age of 5 with COVID-19 vaccines.

Myocarditis and pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination are rare. Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, and pericarditis is inflammation of the outer lining of the heart. Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis after COVID-19 vaccination responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly. As of March 24, 2022, VAERS has received 2,323 preliminary reports of myocarditis or pericarditis among people ages 30 years and younger who received COVID-19 vaccines.

Most cases have been reported after receiving Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna, (mRNA COVID-19 vaccines) particularly in male adolescents and young adults. (Source.)

So let’s “fact check” the CDC’s claims that these cases of heart disease in young people are “rare” by using their own data.

First of all, the CDC only reports on 2 types of heart disease: myocarditis and pericarditis.

We are going to search for ALL cases of “*carditis,” and since they want to start injecting babies with these shots, we are only going to include children under the age of 18 in our search of VAERS.

That search produces 1,261 cases of heart disease in children under the age of 18 in the past 15 months since the COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorization. (Source

By way of contrast, when we conduct the exact same search for all non-COVID vaccines for this same age group for the previous 30+ years, we get a result of 172 cases. (Source.)

When you look at the monthly averages then for cases of carditis following vaccines, we see a 17,495% increase of reported cases of heart disease in children following the COVID-19 shots.

How can this be considered “rare”?

And as horrible as these statistics are, the current situation for children is actually even worse than this, because the vast majority of vaccines administered in the U.S. the previous 30+ years were primarily to children, beginning at birth with the Hep. B vaccine, while the original EUAs issued for the COVID-19 vaccines were only for people above the age of 16.

Pfizer was issued an EUA for children between the ages of 5 and 11 several months later, and Moderna is still waiting for approval to use their COVID-19 vaccines in children between the ages of 5 and 11, and both companies are still waiting for approval to start injecting infants and toddlers under the age of 5.

What will these numbers look like in the future if this genocide is not stopped, and the COVID-19 vaccines are spread to millions of more children and babies?

__________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/heart-damage-teens-after-second-pfizer-shot/

Heart Damage Found in Teens Months After Second Pfizer Shot, Study Shows

A new peer-reviewed study shows more than two-thirds of adolescents with COVID-19 vaccine-related myopericarditis had persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis, raising concerns for potential long-term effects and contradicting claims by health officials that the condition is “mild.”

A new peer-reviewed study shows more than two-thirds of adolescents with COVID-19 vaccine-related myopericarditis had persistent heart abnormalities months after their initial diagnosis, raising concerns for potential long-term effects.

The findings, published March 25 in the Journal of Pediatrics, challenge the position of U.S. health agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which claim heart inflammation associated with the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines is “mild.”

Researchers at Seattle Children’s Hospital reviewed cases of patients younger than 18 years old who presented to the hospital with chest pain and an elevated serum troponin level between April 1, 2021, and Jan. 7, 2022, within one week of receiving a second dose of Pfizer’s vaccine.

While 35 patients fit the criteria, 19 were excluded for various reasons. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the remaining 16 patients was performed three to eight months after they were first examined. The MRIs showed 11 had persistent late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), although levels were lower than in previous months.

According to the study, “The presence of LGE is an indicator of cardiac injury and fibrosis and has been strongly associated with worse prognosis in patients with classical acute myocarditis.”

In a meta-analysis of eight studies, LGE was found to be a predictor of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, cardiac transplant, rehospitalization, recurrent acute myocarditis and requirement for mechanical circulatory support.

Similarly, an 11-study meta-analysis found the “presence and extent of LGE to be a significant predictor of adverse cardiac outcomes.”

Researchers said that while symptoms “were transient and most patients appeared to respond to treatment,” the analysis showed a “persistence of abnormal findings.”

The results “rais[e] concerns for potential longer-term effects,” researchers wrote, adding that they plan to repeat imaging at one year after the vaccine to assess whether abnormalities have resolved.

“The paper provides more evidence that myocarditis in adolescents that result from COVID-19 vaccines is very serious,” said Dr. Madhava Setty, senior science editor for The Defender.

“All patients had significantly elevated serum troponin levels indicative of heart damage. And LGE, which is indicative of poor outcome, was present in more than two-thirds of the kids.”

The study stated, “All patients had elevated serum troponin levels (median 9.15 ng/mL, range 0.65-18.5, normal < 0.05 ng/mL).”

“These young patients had a median troponin level of 9.15 — more than 20 times greater than the levels found in people suffering heart attacks,” Setty said.

Commenting on the study, Dr. Marty Makary, surgeon and public policy researcher at Johns Hopkins University, tweeted “CDC has a civic duty to rigorously study the long-term effects of vaccine-induced myocarditis.”

Dr. Anish Koka, a cardiologist, told The Epoch Times the study suggests 60% to 70% of teenagers who get myocarditis from a COVID vaccine may be left with a scar on their heart.

“Certainly, children who had chest pain severe enough to merit seeking medical attention need to at least make sure they get a follow-up MRI,” Koka said, adding that the findings “should have clear implications for the discussion around vaccines, especially for high-risk male teenagers … and definitely for vaccine mandates.”

Both Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines have been linked to several forms of heart inflammation, including myocarditis and pericarditis.

Myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart, is a severe and life-shortening disease. It was virtually unknown in young people until it became a recognized side effect of mRNA COVID vaccines, especially in boys and young men.

Pericarditis is inflammation of the pericardium, a sac-like structure with two layers of tissue that surrounds the heart to hold it in place and help it work.

According to the CDC, the most at-risk group is 16- and 17-year-old males, who have reported rates of 69 per million after the second dose of Pfizer’s COVID vaccine, although that number is likely underreported.

The CDC presentation also reported that in three-month follow-up evaluations, less than one-third of adolescents 12 to 17 who suffered vaccine-induced myocarditis (reported in Vaccine Safety DataLink) had fully recovered.

The 69-per-million rate the CDC uses to determine the incidence of myocarditis in 16- and 17-year-olds came from the agency’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — a U.S. government-run database that receives reports of vaccine adverse events.

One of the biggest limitations of passive surveillance systems, like VAERS, is that the system “receives reports for only a small fraction of adverse events,” according to the Department of Health and Human Services website.

A recent study from Hong Kong suggests the incidence of myo/pericarditis after two doses of Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine was 37 in 100,000 (370 per million).

This incidence matches nearly exactly with findings from a study that used the Vaccine Safety DataLink system, which showed 37.7 12- to 17-year-olds per 100,000 suffered myo/pericarditis after their second vaccine dose.

This indicates an incidence rate that is almost six times higher than the 69-per-million rate reported by the CDC.

In a preprint study from Kaiser Permanente, the incidence of myocarditis in 18- to 24-year-old males post-vaccination was even higher — at 537 per million, or 7.7 times higher than the statistics reported by the CDC.

No such thing as ‘mild’ heart damage

A paper published Jan. 14 in Circulation summarized the clinical course of 139 young patients between the ages of 12 and 20 who were hospitalized for myocarditis following COVID vaccination.

Of those patients, 19% were taken into intensive care, two required infusions of potent intravenous drugs used to raise critically low blood pressure and every patient had an elevated troponin level.

Troponin is an enzyme specific to cardiac myocytes. Levels above 0.4 ng/ml are strongly suggestive of heart damage.

The paper concluded, “Most cases of suspected COVID-19 vaccine myocarditis occurring in persons <21 years have a mild clinical course with rapid resolution of symptoms.”

“We suppose [a ‘mild clinical course] refers to the 81% who did not go to the ICU or the fact that none died or required ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, a desperate means to keep the body oxygenated when a patient’s heart or lungs have completely failed),” wrote Setty and Josh Mitteldorf, Ph.D., a theoretical physicist, in an article critiquing the Circulation paper.

“When does a ‘mild clinical course’ require hospitalization for a two-day median length of stay?” they asked. “How does anyone know if symptoms rapidly resolve?”

“We don’t know what it will do to young boys in the long term, especially since every patient had some damage to their heart as evidenced by significantly abnormal troponin levels,” Setty and Mitteldorf wrote. “And we don’t fully understand the mechanism by which the vaccines cause myocarditis.”

Category:

Activism, Heart Issues, vaccines, Viruses

The Chilling Reason They Won’t Declare the Pandemic Over? Creation of the Pandemic Treaty

http://  Approx. 9 Min

World Economic Forum: Davos, Switzerland

Blatant Hypocrisy Displayed in Real-Time

The peons are warned that there will be some pain involved in following the plan set forward by the elites for our own good.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/the-chilling-reason-they-wont-declare-the-pandemic-over

The Chilling Reason They Won’t Declare the Pandemic Over?

By Joseph Mercola
Updated: March 31, 2022

Over the past two years, in the name of keeping everyone “safe” from infection, the globalists have justified unprecedented attacks on democracy, civil liberties and personal freedoms, including the right to choose your own medical treatment. Now, the WHO wants to make its pandemic leadership permanent, and to extend it into the health care systems of every nation.

The negotiations for this treaty began March 3, 2022.(1) As reported by The Pulse (video above):

“Coming off the back of the COVID-19 pandemic, the World Health Organization is proposing a new pandemic treaty they’re hoping will be accepted by enough member countries to become a reality by 2024.”

The pandemic treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere.

Treaty Threatens National Sovereignty

As noted by The Pulse, “there are a number of things in the treaty that the people of the world need to consider before going down this path.” In the featured video, The Pulse’s Joe Martino interviews Shabnam Palesa Mohamed, a member of the steering committee of the World Council for Health, who points out that the treaty gives the WHO:

“… an inordinate amount of power to make decisions in sovereign countries as to how people live and how they deal with pandemics, from lockdowns to mandates over treatment.”

In short, it would create a one-size-fits-all approach to disease, without regard for all the varying situations found in individual countries, and this is something we already know doesn’t work. The treaty is a direct threat to a nation’s sovereignty to make decisions for itself and its citizens, and would erode democracy everywhere.

At the same time, it would cost each member country millions of dollars to participate in this process. As explained by Mohamed, the treaty will need to go through a voting process at the World Health Assembly in 2023. They need a majority for it to pass and, if passed, all member countries will be bound by it.

The Treaty Is ‘Invalid and Unlawful’

Another concern raised by Mohamed is that many countries don’t even know about this treaty as of yet, and it’s possible that the WHO might try to push for earlier implementation than 2024 — all without public participation or input. “It is undemocratic, it is unconstitutional and therefore it makes the treaty invalid and unlawful,” she says.

She also highlights the WHO’s many health policy failures, which are “intrinsically linked to conflicts of interest.” In an open letter on the WHO’s pandemic treaty, the World Council for Health writes, in part: (2)  (See link for article)

____________________

**UPDATE**

There’s an important link with the accepted narrative about”climate change” and the current COVID debacle.  If you are unaware of this connection, please take the time to go down a dark rabbit-hole that connects the dots. This news story reports on the World Economic Forum’s (WEF) ESG score, (environment, social, and corporate governance) which is similar to a credit score and is centered around sustainability & ethics.  Currently given only to corporations, it isn’t a stretch to imagine this extended to individuals. Like everything else, the system is subjective to whomever decides what “ethical, diverse, and sustainable” is.  The scores can change on a whim. Companies are changing slogans, censoring content, firing controversial people, and modifying behavior to ingratiate themselves to those in power. ESG score determines how much and how easy it is for a company to secure funds & investments.

Who has the highest scores?
Microsoft, founded by Bill Gates, and Disney.

This system is already being used in China and is politically corrupted.

And while comedic in nature, this video, is an accurate piece of investigative journalism, which reveals words about “The Great Reset” right out of the horse’s mouth.  It gives details of Klaus Schwab, chairman of the WEF, and describes the climate fear-mongering, as well as WEF’s partnership with investment firm BlackRock, which has infiltrated the government and is colluding in corporatism, where an unelected corporate elite dictates top down to the population.  Also featured are the harrowing words of Dr. Yuval Noah Harari, top adviser to Schwab and the WEF.  A noted transhumanist, he states that soon corporations and governments will be able to “systematically hack all the people.”  He calls this “intelligent design” not created by “some God above the clouds,” but “our intelligent design,” and the “intelligent design of our Clouds, the IBM Cloud, the Microsoft Cloud, these are the new driving forces of evolution.”

Lastly, Harari has given harrowing quotes:

“Today we have the technology to hack human beings on a massive scale.”

“In this time of crisis you have to follow science.”

“It’s often said you should never allow a good crisis to go to waste.”

“Surveillance…..people could look back in 100 years and identify the coronavirus epidemic as the moment when a new regime of surveillance took over, especially surveillance under the skin.”

Before you chalk this up to a “conspiracy” theory that could never happen, please see this article on Charles Lieber, aka the NanoTech King, involved in the Thousand Talent Plan who was accused of being a spy for the Chinese Community Party (CCP) and was arrested for 6 counts of tax evasion. The Biden DOJ scrapped the entire Trump-China initiative, which was to combat China’s campaign to steal US secrets, technology, and research, stating it didn’t embody “the right approach,” and scrubbed it entirely from the DOJ website. 

  • A 2018 report discovered 80% of all economic espionage prosecutions brought by the DOJ alleged conduct that benefits the Chinese state
  • 60% of all trade secret theft cases have a nexus to China
  • FBI Director Christopher Wray stated: “the greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality, is the counterintelligence and economic espionage threat from China”
  • this past March, a New Jersey man was convicted for his participation in a conspiracy to fraudulently obtain US visas for Chinese government employees. He was also engaged in recruiting US scientists, academics, engineers, and other experts to work in China

Lieber is the mastermind behind:

  • 66+ nanotech-related patents, including cyborg heart tissue
  • DOD funded injectable nanoscale wires and/or injectable devices that will be able to connect the body to 5G and the Internet of Things (IoT)
  • brain implant nanotechnology that paved the way for Elon Musk’s Neuralink/Neurolace which has already been implanted into the brain of a 9-year old monkey allowing him to play a video game by “simply thinking about moving his hands. Neuralink sounds an awful lot like Merge in the frightening fictional book, “The Utopia Experiment”
  • Elon Musk states this is a key step in merging human consciousness with AI
  • Musk stated in 2020 that Neuralink could be experimented “in a human as soon as this year”.  Neuralink involves drilling a hole into the skull and putting flexible threads of electrodes inserted through brain tissue.  See pic:
  • Of course similarly to ‘vaccines,’ and despite the consequences, it’s all for the “greater good,” and under the pretext of medicine, but some are willing to be honest and state the truth: it’s to connect you to the IoT & “smart”machines, and for reading a person’s mind, and to enable surveillance under the skin
  • MuckRock, a non-profit collaborative news site, suspects unethical or illegal conduct within UPenn neuroscience-related research projects, and also lists a link titled “Implantable Graphene Nanotechnology Investigational Device Exemption Approval Documents;” however, the page is now 404’d
    • Three independent scientific studies show Graphene nanoparticles make up 98-99.5% of the COVID shots
    • It’s also in masks & PCR swabs
    • Recent testing has now confirmed it’s in precipitation, along with an already long list of toxins like aluminum
  • Graphene is superconductive, highly integrative with neurons in the brain using radio-frequencies and can map, transmit, and receive instructions remotely. It also causes blood clotting and magnetism
  • Nonprofit advocacy group Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine (PCRM), details that people have come forward, claiming their brains have been messed with, without their consent

A neuro-techno future is underway, and it is reconceptualizing our human rights laws and prompting the need for new ones.  Source

While people are clamoring for Metaverse, there are those who want to trace and store everything, which is not only an invasion of privacy, but can be used against you.  This technology can also be hacked, allowing a third party access.

SUMMARY of the Pandemic Treaty article:

  • If passed, there’s no accountability due to diplomatic immunity if people are harmed by WHO policies
  • While focused on pandemics, there’s serious concerns it would be expanded to cover all areas of health turning the WHO into a global health dictatorship
  • The WHO recently removed the specificity of “mass casualties” from the definition of a pandemic which means a pandemic can be about any disease that occurs in multiple countries – or anything the WHO wants to label a pandemic
  • The WHO also recently changed the definition of “herd immunity” to only include “vaccines”, not natural immunity – rewriting hundreds of years of scientific understanding
  • WHO hopes to mandate “vaccine” passports and COVID shots worldwide and is already working on the creation of a global “vaccine” passport/digital identity program
  • The treaty would give the WHO power to censor health information globally – even more censorship than is currently being seen
  • “Build Back Better” is a slogan of The Great Reset and is intended to shift the financial system over to an all-digital centrally controlled currency system tied to a “vaccine” passport and/or digital identity system
  • Using this system, desired behaviors can be incentivized while undesired behaviors can be punished – including access to your own finances
  • While the world was distracted by Will Smith, the internal elite met at the World Government Summit in Dubai where WEF head Klaus Schwab and ilk spoke of a “longer-term narrative” to make the world “more resilient, more inclusive, and more sustainable“. Pippa Malgren, economist at the WGS states the world financial system is about to switch accounting systems to digital money (cashless)- not decentralized cryptos, but centralized central bank digital currency. She states we will need a digital constitution of human rights. Simply put, central banks will have complete control over your money and will be able to program it so that it can only be spent on certain things or in certain places. Posted two years ago, human-implantable cryptocurrency systemusing “quantum-dot tattoos” have been created by MIT & Rice University researchers after being approached by Bill Gates.  The patent states that “conditions set by the cryptocurrency system” can be awarded cryptocurrency to the user. In other words, if you are a good boy or girl you get points.  A 2019 MIT study funded by the Gates Foundation describes how “near-infrared quantum dots” can be implanted under the skin along with a “vaccine” to encode information for “decentralized data storage and bio-sensing.”  https://sci-hub.tw/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay7162
  • Interesting side-note to the Rock/Smith distraction is the fact that the 2022 Oscars were sponsored by Pfizer, the company that just happens to have a new Alopecia drug coming out very soon, which I’m sure is purely coincidental. Seems everything today is “brought to you by Pfizer.”
    • Schwab’s “the 4th Industrial Revolution,” is the “digital panopticon of the future, where digital surveillance is omnipresent and humanity uses digital technology to alter our lives. Often associated with terms like the Internet of Things, the Internet of Bodies, the Internet of Humans, and the Internet of Senses, this world will be powered by5G and 6G technology.”  (Please note many believe this technology is dangerous to the human body)
    • Many spoke, including WHO Director Dr. Tedros Ghebreyesus and Fred Kempe, president and CEO of the Athlantic Council, anchor for CNN, and former advisor to former president George W. Bush.
    • The WGS spent considerable time discussing theUnited Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) which form the core of the Agenda 2030, itself part of The Great Reset agenda, as well as Blockchain, AI, 6G, and Human Meta-Cities, a rebranding of the so-called Smart Cities.
    • The truly frightening discussion was titled: The Invisible Government: Eliminating Bureaucracy Through Technology: “What goes unsaid in the panel description is that making the government “invisible” will actually lead to a world of no accountability for government and politicians. In reality, the Technocrats imagine a world where the tyrannical technological systems are invisible and the average person has zero recourse for preventing exclusion or punishment based on their social credit score.”
Hopefully it is plainly and abundantly clear what the desired goal of the Technocrats is, and that COVID merely opened the door to Pandora’s Box
The WHO pandemic treaty must be opposed by all or we will find ourselves living in “1984” with our personal and medical freedoms completely gone.

Sources and References

___________________

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Fauci Told Our Government to Tell People “Don’t Do Autopsies On COVID Patients”

https://rumble.com/vxwz04-dr.-ryan-cole-on-dead-covid-patients-we-were-told-by-fauci-do-not-do-autopsy Video Here (Approx. 9 Min)

Fauci: “Don’t Do Autopsies”

March 20, 2022

“You can not find that for which you do not look.” ~ Dr. Ryan Cole

Dr. Cole said autopsies are finally starting to be done and that he has personally seen a nine-year-old as well as a healthy 22 year old wrestler both die after the COVID shots.

Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Robert Malone are tired of seeing young children die or suffer permanent damage from a “vaccine” that “does not work for a virus that is no longer here and most of them have already recovered.” Yet, the courageous medical experts, who have been smeared and maligned by big pharma, left-wing politicians, and media, continue to risk their careers to save children.

Malone, creator of the mRNA technology, warns parents of three issues:

  1. A viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells which forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins which can cause permanent, irreparable damage to critical organs including the brain and nervous system, heart and blood vessels including blood clots, the reproductive system, and the immune system.
  2. This novel mRNA technology has not been adequately tested, and a minimum of five years of testing and research should be done before risks can be understood.
  3. Reasons being given to “vaccinate” children are based upon lies.  Children represent no danger to parents or grandparents and it’s actually the opposite.  Their immunity after recovery is critical to save your family, if not the world from this disease.  They generate broad, long-lasting natural immunity which is the best answer.  There are 150 studies published on natural immunity, evidence for early outpatient treatment for COVID, more than 150 comparative studies & articles on mask ineffectiveness and harms, more than 400 studies on the failure of lockdowns and restrictions, 44 studies on “vaccine” efficacy that raise doubts on “vaccine” mandates, as well as 20 steps to end the madness by their colleague, Dr. Paul Alexander at Brownstone Institute.

https://rairfoundation.com/doctors-sound-alarm-covid-vaccines-are-killing-children-and-causing-permanent-damage-video/  Video Here

Doctors Sound Alarm: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Are Killing Children and Causing Permanent Damage (Video)

 Amy Mek
March 20, 2022

“As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.” – Dr. Robert Malone

Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the inventor of the core mRNA vaccine technology platform, and Dr. Ryan Cole, a Mayo Clinic trained Pathologist who is the CEO and Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics, are fighting to save children from the detrimental effects of the Covid vaccines.

The two medical experts were featured at four sold-out One Washington events. The event organizer is a non-profit organization that is helping equip parents, lawmakers, and activists to counter moves by the state Board of Health to add the Covid “vaccine” to the required shots for public school children.

Cancer Spreads Like Wildfire

RAIR Foundation USA had previously reported on Dr. Cole, who warned that the Covid “vaccines” are also linked to increased cancer cases.

After he spoke out about the risks of the shots, ‘numerous’ oncologists contacted him. The doctors reported they are “seeing the weirdest cancers, and cancers that we have been able to keep in check and treat, taking off like wildfire – going stage 2, stage 3, stage 4, just like that.”

https://rumble.com/vv5z8m-dr.-roger-hodkinson-discusses-heart-damage-from-mrna-injection  Video Here (Approx. 6 Min)

Pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson

Heart Damage & Blood Clotting After mRNA Injection

Article here:  https://rairfoundation.com/alert-dr-roger-hodkinson-on-heart-damage-blood-clotting-from-mrna-injection-exclusive/

These conditions are being “sloughed off” by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as “too low a frequency to be concerned about, etc.,” Dr. Roger Hodkinson observed. While the CDC and their political allies dismiss heart damage from the mRNA “vaccine,” the problem is very real and has short term, as well as long term implications.

“They’re not mild,” the pathologist emphasized, “and the frequency is substantially higher than what they’re claiming as all kinds of data is coming out.”

Just this week, RAIR Foundation USA reported on two young boys found dead with myocarditis within a week of taking the shot.

“Jessica Rose in Israel, for example, is one of the prime statisticians that’s drawing attention to [the weak reporting systems],” Dr. Hodkinson said. “This is a very serious problem,” he continued. Dr. Hodkinson mentioned the soccer players and pilots who are dying from heart damage after taking the mRNA injections.

And this article by Dr. Clare Craig, a diagnostic pathologist and Co-Chair of HART shows that heart deaths in children and young people increase after each COVID shot dose, according to UK ONS data, despite their conclusion that there isn’t an association between the shots and increased death.

  • The ONS agreed in court that there was a statistically significant increase in registered deaths of 15-19 year old males since May 2021, yet it provided no breakdown by age or sex in this study. Why not?
  • What is the reason for the 12 week arbitrary cut-off?
  • Despite the authors declaring no conflicts of interests, one of the authors, Kamlesh Khunti, a member of SAGE, has previously declared that he “acted as a consultant, speaker or received grants for investigator-initiated studies for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie AG/Menarini Group, Janssen and Napp”. Another author, Amitava Banerjee, has written about the importance of declaring conflicts of interest but failed to declare, on this paper, that his research is funded by AstraZeneca. Did these conflict create a bias in how this data was presented?
  • Vaccine induced spike protein appears to have a strong relationship with cardiac death which worsens with each dose:
    • 16% of deaths being cardiac within 12 weeks of a first dose
    • 19% within 12 weeks of a second dose
    • 27% within 12 weeks of a third dose
There is a marked signal here of an increase in cardiac deaths due to vaccination that must not be ignored.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Broken Science Tonight 7:30pm ET & The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine

https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-martin-kulldorff-how-to-dismantle-the-cartel-of-public-health-funding-and-rekindle-open-scientific-inquiry  Go here for episode

Dr. Martin Kulldorff: How to Dismantle the ‘Cartel’ of Public Health Funding and Rekindle Open Scientific Inquiry

JAN JEKIELEK

This episode will premiere on Thurs. March 31, at 7:30 p.m. ET.     

“New ideas always come from the fringe in science. So we have to encourage new ideas to come up. We can’t have science become a religion where there are dogmas.”

In this episode, filmed at Hillsdale College’s Censorship of Science conference, we sit down with Dr. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist, biostatistician, and former professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. He’s a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration that argued for “focused protection” of the vulnerable instead of lockdowns.

Kulldorff breaks down what he sees as the “power hubs” controlling policy, research funding, and career advancement in the scientific world.

“Dr. Fauci sort of sits on the biggest chunk of infectious disease research money in the world. So it takes a bit of guts to contradict his view on pandemic strategy.”

Kulldorff is the scientific director at the Brownstone Institute and a founding fellow at Hillsdale College’s Academy for Science and Freedom.

“I’m very concerned that 400 years of enlightenment or scientific progress may come to an end. And I think we have to work very hard to avoid that.”

For more: 

http://

The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine

Dr. John Campbell

March 26, 2022

Dr. Campbell goes through a paper that is in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) on how evidence based medicine has been corrupted by corporate interests, failed regulation, and commercialization of academia.

The Research Leader, child psychiatrist Adelaide Leemon B. McHenry, is professor emeritus Emeritus Professor at Cal State University. The research is not commissioned, but is externally peer reviewed & was published on March 16, 2022:  https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702

Evidence based medicine has been corrupted by corporate interests, failed regulation, and commercialisation of academia, argue these authors

The advent of evidence based medicine was a paradigm shift intended to provide a solid scientific foundation for medicine. The validity of this new paradigm, however, depends on reliable data from clinical trials, most of which are conducted by the pharmaceutical industry and reported in the names of senior academics. The release into the public domain of previously confidential pharmaceutical industry documents has given the medical community valuable insight into the degree to which industry sponsored clinical trials are misrepresented.1234 Until this problem is corrected, evidence based medicine will remain an illusion.

The philosophy of critical rationalism, advanced by the philosopher Karl Popper, famously advocated for the integrity of science and its role in an open, democratic society. A science of real integrity would be one in which practitioners are careful not to cling to cherished hypotheses and take seriously the outcome of the most stringent experiments.5 This ideal is, however, threatened by corporations, in which financial interests trump the common good. Medicine is largely dominated by a small number of very large pharmaceutical companies that compete for market share, but are effectively united in their efforts to expanding that market. The short term stimulus to biomedical research because of privatisation has been celebrated by free market champions, but the unintended, long term consequences for medicine have been severe. Scientific progress is thwarted by the ownership of data and knowledge because industry suppresses negative trial results, fails to report adverse events, and does not share raw data with the academic research community. Patients die because of the adverse impact of commercial interests on the research agenda, universities, and regulators.

The pharmaceutical industry’s responsibility to its shareholders means that priority must be given to their hierarchical power structures, product loyalty, and public relations propaganda over scientific integrity. Although universities have always been elite institutions prone to influence through endowments, they have long laid claim to being guardians of truth and the moral conscience of society. But in the face of inadequate government funding, they have adopted a neo-liberal market approach, actively seeking pharmaceutical funding on commercial terms. As a result, university departments become instruments of industry: through company control of the research agenda and ghostwriting of medical journal articles and continuing medical education, academics become agents for the promotion of commercial products.6 When scandals involving industry-academe partnership are exposed in the mainstream media, trust in academic institutions is weakened and the vision of an open society is betrayed.

The corporate university also compromises the concept of academic leadership. Deans who reached their leadership positions by virtue of distinguished contributions to their disciplines have in places been replaced with fundraisers and academic managers, who are forced to demonstrate their profitability or show how they can attract corporate sponsors. In medicine, those who succeed in academia are likely to be key opinion leaders (KOLs in marketing parlance), whose careers can be advanced through the opportunities provided by industry. Potential KOLs are selected based on a complex array of profiling activities carried out by companies, for example, physicians are selected based on their influence on prescribing habits of other physicians.7 KOLs are sought out by industry for this influence and for the prestige that their university affiliation brings to the branding of the company’s products. As well paid members of pharmaceutical advisory boards and speakers’ bureaus, KOLs present results of industry trials at medical conferences and in continuing medical education. Instead of acting as independent, disinterested scientists and critically evaluating a drug’s performance, they become what marketing executives refer to as “product champions.”

Ironically, industry sponsored KOLs appear to enjoy many of the advantages of academic freedom, supported as they are by their universities, the industry, and journal editors for expressing their views, even when those views are incongruent with the real evidence. While universities fail to correct misrepresentations of the science from such collaborations, critics of industry face rejections from journals, legal threats, and the potential destruction of their careers.8 This uneven playing field is exactly what concerned Popper when he wrote about suppression and control of the means of science communication.9 The preservation of institutions designed to further scientific objectivity and impartiality (i.e., public laboratories, independent scientific periodicals and congresses) is entirely at the mercy of political and commercial power; vested interest will always override the rationality of evidence.10

Regulators receive funding from industry and use industry funded and performed trials to approve drugs, without in most cases seeing the raw data. What confidence do we have in a system in which drug companies are permitted to “mark their own homework” rather than having their products tested by independent experts as part of a public regulatory system? Unconcerned governments and captured regulators are unlikely to initiate necessary change to remove research from industry altogether and clean up publishing models that depend on reprint revenue, advertising, and sponsorship revenue.

Our proposals for reforms include: liberation of regulators from drug company funding; taxation imposed on pharmaceutical companies to allow public funding of independent trials; and, perhaps most importantly, anonymised individual patient level trial data posted, along with study protocols, on suitably accessible websites so that third parties, self-nominated or commissioned by health technology agencies, could rigorously evaluate the methodology and trial results. With the necessary changes to trial consent forms, participants could require trialists to make the data freely available. The open and transparent publication of data are in keeping with our moral obligation to trial participants—real people who have been involved in risky treatment and have a right to expect that the results of their participation will be used in keeping with principles of scientific rigor. Industry concerns about privacy and intellectual property rights should not hold sway.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: McHenry and Jureidini are joint authors of The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine: Exposing the Crisis of Credibility in Clinical Research (Adelaide: Wakefield Press, 2020). Both authors have been remunerated by Los Angeles law firm, Baum, Hedlund, Aristei and Goldman for a fraction of the work they have done in analysing and critiquing GlaxoSmithKline’s paroxetine Study 329 and Forest Laboratories citalopram Study CIT-MD-18. They have no other competing interests to declare.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed

References

  1. ↵
  2. ↵
  3. ↵
  4. ↵
  5. ↵
  6. ↵
  7. ↵
  8. ↵
  9. ↵
  10. ↵

View Abstract

_________________

**Comment**

Please also read “How Politics Corrupted Evidence-Based Medicine – and How to Fix it” by Dr. Robert Malone.

For more:

In short, science and public health is completely broken, and a powerful unelected ‘Cabal’ controls both scientific funding and health policy in America

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

FDA Authorizes 2nd Booster for Ages 50 & Up Without Consulting Its Vax Panel & The Fact There’s a 22,000% Increase in Deaths After Shots

https://thenewamerican.com/fda-authorized-second-booster-for-americans-50-without-consulting-with-its-vax-panel

FDA Authorized Second Booster for Americans 50+ Without Consulting With Its Vax Panel

by Veronika Kyrylenko
FDA Authorized Second Booster for Americans 50+ Without Consulting With Its Vax Panel
Plyushkin/iStock/Getty Images Plus

On Tuesday, the FDA authorized Americans who are 50 years of age and older to receive a second booster of the Covid shot from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna. The move comes after the Biden administration, disregarding the most basic “scientific” decorum and procedures, was reported to offer older Americans a fourth dose of the Covid vaccine. By fall, younger Americans will likely be able to get their second booster, too.

The news of the administration’s planning to make yet another dose available to the public was first reported by The New York Times over the weekend.  (See link for article)

Important excerpt:

There’s a troubling caveat in that decision: it seems to have been made by the administration without discussion with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “independent” panels. Meaning, the Biden administration is releasing the fourth vaccine booster without any public deliberation on the matter.

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • Federal public health agencies have been operating under regulatory capture
  • There is no “science” behind the move
  • Vinay Prasad of the Brownstown Institute argues that the advisory committees’ meetings are skipped “because many smart people will disagree with them, and consider their plan reckless and lacking data.
  • August 2021 – two senior FDA regulators resigned from their positions over disagreement with the White House’s pressure to move forward with COVID booster shots without FDA approval, as well as with the CDC’s involvement in the approval process.
  • VRBPAC decided that it was too early to throw its support behind a blanket authorization for booster doses of Pfizer’s COVID shot for people 16 and older and voted against recommending it to the general public.
  • Prasad states that due to it being an election year, Biden’s desire to “keep COVID numbers low” reaffirms the assumption that public health is acting as a political organization not a health organization.
  • COVID shot efficacy is dire: breakthrough infections even about the triple vaxxed has prompted the Pfizer CEO to announce that the immune protection offered by the third dose “is not very good against infections” and “doesn’t last very long,” yet maintains the necessity of taking yet another dose.

_________________

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/22000-increase-in-deaths-following-covid-vaccines-for-adults-over-50-as-fda-authorizes-2nd-booster-for-this-age-group/

22,000% Increase in Deaths following COVID “Vaccines” for Adults Over 50 as FDA Authorizes 2nd Booster for this Age Group

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

March 29, 2022

A sampling of the stories we have covered over the past 15 months on thousands of older adults dying after the COVID Vaccines.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The FDA announced today that it has issued another emergency use authorization (EUA) for a second COVID booster vaccine for adults over the age of 50, and as young as 12 years old if they are “immune compromised.”

Pfizer had made the request for a second booster shot two weeks ago, but their request was for adults over the age of 65. The FDA, however, lowered that to age 50, and issued the EUA for both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Fierce Pharma reports:

Amid the ongoing debate over the need for another round of COVID-19 boosters, the FDA has acted quickly on the matter.

Only two weeks after Pfizer and its partner BioNTech asked the agency for an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a second round of COVID-19 boosters in people 65 and older, the FDA has granted the nod. The new FDA authorization covers those who have already been boosted with any COVID vaccine and are either 50 and older or 12 and older if they are immunocompromised.

At around the same time on Tuesday morning, Moderna said the FDA had granted its application for a second booster. The Moderna nod covers adults over 50 who have been boosted once, plus immunocompromised adults over 18. Moderna applied for a second booster on March 17. (Full article.)

Do you think the FDA looked at the data in their Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) regarding COVID-19 vaccines for this age group to see if there were any concerns before authorizing a second booster shot for this age group?

Not likely.

As we have previously reported, the FDA does no safety oversight on these vaccines, but simply takes the drug manufacturers’ word for it, allowing them to police themselves. See:

Just Released Documents by Pfizer Show BioNTech Paid FDA $2,875,842.00 “Drug User Fee” for COVID-19 Vaccine Approval

So we will review the data on this age group in VAERS as a service to the public.

Here is what VAERS is reporting for people over the age of 50 following COVID-19 vaccines. (Source

There are currently 14,752 deaths recorded in VAERS for people over the age of 50 following a COVID-19 vaccine, covering a period of 15 months. That’s an average of 983 deaths a month for this age group.

Here are the results for this age group for the previous 30 years following ALL vaccines in VAERS. (Source.)

There were 1,590 deaths recorded following ALL vaccines for the previous 30 years for people older than 50. So if we divide that number by 360 months we get a monthly average of 4.4 deaths.

So we have seen a 22,000% increase in deaths for people over the age of 50 following COVID-19 vaccines, and the FDA just authorized another booster for those who are left in this age group.

But who cares? The corporate media owned by Big Pharma wants everyone to worry about Russia instead right now, while the FDA’s crimes go unpunished and they continue to produce and distribute more deadly shots.

Here is a video I put together last September when the FDA approved the first booster for seniors, which includes whistleblower testimonies from those who saw people die after taking the COVID-19 vaccines.  This is on our Bitchute Channel. (Approx. 20 Min)

This is simply euthanasia and mass murder, and they are getting away with it.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses