Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Wisconsinites: Action Needed for AB 316 – Prohibit Discrimination Based on Vaccination Status

Dear Wisconsin NVIC Advocacy Team Members,

You have the opportunity to support a good bill, AB 316,  which would prohibit governmental entities in Wisconsin from discriminating against individuals based on their COVID-19 vaccination status or whether they have proof of receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. AB 316 is on the Senate Calendar for Tuesday, March 8th, 2022. 

ACTION NEEDED:

1) Contact your Wisconsin State Senator and ask him or her to vote in favor of AB 316! Please see talking points below. If you do not know who your Wisconsin state senator is, login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal at http://NVICAdvocacy.org. Click on “Who Represents Me” on the home page or “My State” on the STATE TEAMS tab. Your personal state legislators are listed on the bottom of the page. You can click on your legislators’ names to get phone numbers, emails, and even links to their social media to connect to them. You can also find your state senator at this link: https://maps.legis.wisconsin.gov/

2) Please share this email with family and friends, or you can tell them to go to http://NVICAdvocacy.org and click on the alert for Wisconsin AB 316.

3) Login to the NVIC Advocacy Portal OFTEN to check for updates.  http://NVICAdvocacy.org. We review bills and make updates daily. Bills can change many times over the legislative process and your timely visits, calls, and emails directed at the correct legislators are critical to this process.

TALKING POINTS (Please personalize to share how this bill affects you and your family):

  • AB 316 would prohibit discrimination based on COVID-19 vaccination status by the state and other governmental entities in Wisconsin.
  • Any form of discrimination against individuals unvaccinated against COVID-19 is essentially a form of coercion to try and get them vaccinated by implementing barriers to navigate life.
  • It is unreasonable to penalize perfectly healthy individuals who simply have not received a particular vaccine.
  • This bill would prohibit government-sponsored COVID-19 vaccine discrimination, allowing residents of Wisconsin to freely participate with their state and local governments.
  • It would also ensure that the residents of Wisconsin are allowed to access needed state and local government facilities and services without fear of discrimination based on their COVID-19 vaccination status.
  • State and local governments are taxpayer-funded and exist to serve the public. Since there is no vaccine requirement for paying taxes, there should be no chance of a vaccine requirement for accessing or using government facilities and services, or as a prerequisite for any other type of interaction with the government.
  • Passing this bill would also clarify that there is no state requirement or expectation of private persons and entities in Wisconsin to mandate COVID-19 vaccines or to require proof of vaccination.
  • Even individuals who are vaccinated against COVID-19 can still spread and catch it. COVID-19 vaccine requirements or mandates reduce the focus from health to mere vaccine status.
  • Our American system of government was founded upon protecting the rights of individuals. This protection entails prohibiting the intrusion upon these rights from other individuals and entities, including the government itself.

Sincerely,

NVIC Advocacy Team
National Vaccine Information Center
http://NVIC.org and http://NVICAdvocacy.org
https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Members/ContactUs.aspx

Make A Difference, support NVIC. NVIC is a certified 501(c)3 Charity.

The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) works diligently to prepare and disseminate our legislative advocacy action alerts and supporting materials.  We request that organizations and members of the public forward our alerts in their original form to assure consistent and accurate messaging and effective action. Please acknowledge NVIC as originators of this work when forwarding to members of the public and like-minded organizations. To receive alerts immediately, register  at http://NVICAdvocacy.org, a website dedicated to this sole purpose and provided as a free public service by NVIC. 

For a rousing pro-medical freedom, anti-segregation speech by a civil rights attorney who flatly states “vaccine” mandates are illegal and a form of medical rape:  https://rumble.com/vs33yz-tricia-lindsay.html

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Former WHO Consultant Exposes Ivermectin Takedown

Again, Lyme/MSIDS patients need to understand that when corrupt public health authorities and governmental agencies censor and ban what they consider ‘misinformation,’ patients will be negatively impacted as dissenting opinions will not be allowed.  This has happened for 40 years in Lymeland and now is being seen in COVID. The following information is an important lesson that is imperative to know or we will find ourselves without any help whatsoever from medicine.  As it is, we must find Lyme literate doctors (LLMDs) who defy the accepted narrative that Lyme is hard to catch, and easy to treat and that uses abysmal testing that misses nearly everyone, leaving thousands upon thousands to suffer in silence.  Please share this info widely so people are educated on what is happening.

https://thehighwire.com/videos/former-w-h-o-consultant-exposes-takedown-of-ivermectin/  Video Here (Approx 55 Min)

FORMER W.H.O. CONSULTANT EXPOSES TAKEDOWN OF IVERMECTIN

Del sits down for a one-on-one with the former W.H.O. consultant & research scientist, Tess Lawrie MD, PhD, who was a critical part of the Ivermectin trials over a year ago with overwhelmingly positive conclusions. See data and recorded personal zoom calls that reveal how a key review was attacked from within, keeping the safe, life-saving drug out of the hands of millions of dying Covid patients for more than a year.
This is a mind-blowing expose on how Ivermectin was covered up. There have been too many scenarios, just like this one, where a well-meaning doctor or scientist appears to be doing the right thing, trying to show the truth about the efficacy (or non-efficacy) of a drug, until suddenly, they start acting very strangely, they are no longer being ethical, and won’t admit why.  Money and coercion are typically at the root of these scenarios, and sadly, this is just one more case where – what do you know – as it turns out, The Gates Foundation seems to have been one of the major factors in this cover-up.  Source  (I highly recommend utilizing this sourcelink as there is a plethora of information within it including interviews and data.)
For more:

Category:

Activism, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

‘Truly Frightening:’ Feds Give Tech Companies Until May 2 to ‘Turn Over COVID-19 Misinformation’

Lyme/MSIDS patients need to understand that when the government attacks free speech and dissenting medical opinions, it’s just a matter of time before the ‘eye or Mordor’ swings to any subject that they deem ‘misinformation,’ including but not limited to Lyme/MSIDS, vaccines, autism, MS, and more.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/feds-tech-companies-turn-over-covid-19-misinformation/

‘Truly Frightening:’ Feds Give Tech Companies Until May 2 to ‘Turn Over COVID-19 Misinformation’

Two U.S. Senators this week introduced a bill that could criminalize First Amendment rights, while the U.S. Surgeon General formally demanded tech companies turn over data on organizations and individuals who post “COVID-19 misinformation” on social media platforms.
Two news stories this week reveal how the federal government plans to treat COVID “misinformation” as a crime.

Two news stories this week reveal how the federal government plans to treat COVID “misinformation” as a crime, and what role tech companies will play in rounding up the “criminal.”

This is truly frightening.

Two U.S. Senators this week introduced a bill to provide tech companies cover via legislation that could make it possible for Congress to “legalize” censorship and criminalize First Amendment rights to freedom of speech.

Here’s a press release describing the bill:

“U.S. Senators Ben Ray Luján (D-N.M.) and Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), both members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, on Wednesday introduced legislation to counter the threat that misinformation and disinformation pose to public health as evidenced by the widespread false narratives throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The Promoting Public Health Information Act would support efforts across the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and with outside stakeholders to communicate effectively during a public health emergency and address health misinformation.”

Here is what Murphy had to say about the bill:

“Throughout this pandemic, the impact of misinformation has been devastating. Rumors and conspiracy theories about the efficacy of masking or the safety of vaccines still run rampant on social media and have caused thousands of deaths that could have been prevented.

“This legislation will help us get smart about how to tackle misinformation and effectively promote science-based health information, especially as we continue fighting COVID-19 and prepare for future public health emergencies.”

In other words, the feds are asking detailed information about the demographics “exposed to misinformation,” allowing them to determine who’s reading what, and to obtain their names.

Next, in the last paragraph of this New York Times article, “The surgeon general calls on Big Tech to turn over Covid-19 misinformation data,” we learn that the federal government wants citizens to start “sharing” information on “misinformation:”

“‘We’re asking anyone with relevant insights — from original research and data sets to personal stories that speak to the role of misinformation in public health — to share them with us,’ Dr. [Vivek] Murthy said.”

Isn’t that sweet?

This is how they dress up the Stasi in 21st-century euphemism to encourage ratting out your friends and neighbors: “Please share with the feds. They care what you think.”

Sure they do.

According to the Times:

“President Biden’s surgeon general on Thursday formally requested major tech platforms submit information about the scale of COVID-19 misinformation on social networks, search engines, crowdsourced platforms, e-commerce platforms and instant messaging systems.

“The request for information from the surgeon general’s office demanded tech platforms send data and analysis on the prevalence of COVID-19 misinformation on their sites, starting with common examples of vaccine misinformation documented by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The notice asks the companies to submit ‘exactly how many users saw or may have been exposed to instances of COVID-19 misinformation,’ as well as aggregate data on demographics that may have been disproportionately exposed to, or affected by, the misinformation.

“The surgeon general, Dr. Vivek Murthy, also demanded information from the platforms about the major sources of Covid-19 misinformation, including those that engaged in the sale of unproven Covid-19 products, services and treatments.

“‘Technology companies now have the opportunity to be open and transparent with the American people about the misinformation on their platforms,’” Murthy said in an emailed statement. He added: “‘This is about protecting the nation’s health.’”

“Companies have until May 2 to submit the data. Denying requests for information does not carry a penalty, but the notice is the first formal request from the Biden administration of the tech companies to submit COVID-19 misinformation data, according to the surgeon general’s office.

“Six months ago, Murthy used his first formal advisory to the U.S. to deliver a broadside against tech and social media companies, which he accused of not doing enough to stop the spread of dangerous health misinformation — especially about COVID-19. He called the misinformation “an urgent threat to public health.”

“The request for information is part of President Biden’s National COVID-⁠19 Preparedness Plan, which the White House detailed on Wednesday and which is a road map for a new stage of the pandemic where COVID-19 causes ‘minimal disruption,’ according to the White House.

Biden first revealed details of the plan during his State of the Union address Tuesday night.

“In addition to demanding misinformation data from the tech platforms, the surgeon general called on healthcare providers and the public to submit information about how COVID-19 misinformation has negatively influenced patients and communities.

“‘We’re asking anyone with relevant insights — from original research and data sets to personal stories that speak to the role of misinformation in public health — to share them with us,’” Murthy said.”

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

US Senate Passes Bill to End COVID-19. Internal Memo Shows Biden, CDC Following Poll Numbers, Not Science & Will Your Governor Stand Up Against Tyranny?

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us-senate-passes-bill-to-end-covid-19-national-emergency

US Senate Passes Bill to End COVID-19 National Emergency

By Zachary Stieber
March 3, 2022 Updated: March 3, 2022

The U.S. Senate on March 3 approved a measure that would end the national emergency over COVID-19.

The resolution passed 48–47 on a party-line vote.

All Republicans voted for S.J.Res. 38, which would end the national emergency declared by President Donald Trump on March 13, 2020. All Democrats voted against the declaration, which has been extended twice by President Joe Biden.

Five senators missed the vote, including three Democrats.  (See link for article)

_________________

**Comment**

The Bill now heads to the House of Representatives, which if remains partisan will also vote against the declaration.  The White House said on March 3 that Biden would veto it.

Please listen to this video with Dr. Malone and Dr. McCullough. They explain how COVID has been politicized, with government controlling health care, resulting in a tragedy with a huge loss of human life.

Also, please sign this petition demanding Congress step up to shield our children, not public health profiteers.

_________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/internal-memo-biden-cdc-following-poll-numbers-not-science/

Internal Memo Shows Biden, CDC Following Poll Numbers, Not Science

In his State of the Union address Tuesday, President Biden parrotted COVID talking points circulated in a memo by the firm that conducted polling for his 2020 presidential campaign. The Feb. 24 memo came out days before Biden’s address and just one day before the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention eased masking restrictions.

An internal memo from a firm that conducted polling for President Biden’s 2020 presidential campaign advises the Democratic Party on how it can present itself as having “defeated” COVID-19. 

The content of the Feb. 24 memo, “Taking the Win over COVID-19,” closely matches statements Biden made Tuesday during Tuesday’s State of the Union address.

The two-page memo was distributed to “interested parties” by Impact Research, a public opinion research firm that provides “strategic thoughts for Democrats positioning themselves on COVID-19 after nearly two years of the pandemic.”

The “strategic thoughts” proffered by Impact Research include:

  • Declare the crisis phase of COVID over and push for feeling and acting more normal.
  • Recognize that people are “worn out” and feeling real harm from the years-long restrictions and take their side.
  • Acknowledge COVID still exists and likely will for a long time.
  • Don’t set “COVID zero” as the victory condition.
  • Stop talking about restrictions and the unknown future ahead.

(See link for article)

_____________________

**Comment**

Recently Dr. Vinay Prasad MD gave a scathing review of how the CDC has abandoned science.  I would argue that this is not new as they have abandoned science for 40 years regarding Lyme/MSIDS, as well as many other diseases and issues. Here, another doctor states the CDC doesn’t even bother to read the science, and here a pathologist calls Fauci the most ‘vile person living on the planet at this time.’  France’s vaccine policy chief was fired for stating COVID policy is “completely stupid” and “unethical.”

So despite the talking heads on TV, and the bought out media pushing the accepted narrative, desperately trying to shout down dissenters, there is a growing movement of doctors and scientists screaming about government corruption and conflicts of interest which have been used to take away medical freedom and personal liberties.  Please share and educate this with others so they have a more balanced understanding, because this glaring issue isn’t going away any time soon and will take effort on our part to bring this evil to light.  IMO, COVID has brought the issue out into the light but again, it’s not new.

https://standforhealthfreedom.com/interview/will-your-governor-stand/

Primaries Are Your Secret Weapon

**Content for this blog came from discussion with Leah Wilson, Executive Director of Stand for health Freedom, and from “Advocacy Lifeline with Dawn Richardson,” Episode 14 at 48:42, February 14, 2022. 

Imagine this: There is talk of another lockdown in your state. You know the devastation it will cause so you pick up the phone and call your governor’s office. You let them know your concerns. You tell others to do the same. The next week you see a headline that your governor will keep businesses and schools open. Your voice was heard.

This is not a fantasy. This happens when we build relationships with people who will represent us. The primaries give us an amazing opportunity to do just that.

How will the 2022 primaries help us fight federal tyranny?

When the federal government issues an Order or guidance or other health policy, your governor can choose or refuse compliance. When the CDC changes their hive-mind about masks again, your governor decides whether the state will mandate. When vaccine mandates were pushed from the White House, governors aligned with attorneys general to sue. Health and welfare are the Constitutionally-protected domain of the states, but covid policy has attacked the right of States to protect health of their residents.

In 2022, 36 governors across the US will face voters. These races are critical for the liberty of all Americans. Governors will either set the tone for cultural freedom or pave the way for bad policies to continue. Some governors championed health freedom over the past two years, and some destroyed it. If you live in a state where your informed consent and health privacy was trampled on, you’ll want to be extra vigilant about finding a gubernatorial candidate who will fight for you and your family because we know the White House will keep pushing to control local health decisions.

Michigan is one such state. Gubernatorial candidate Dr. Garrett Soldano, a chiropractor and small business-owner, founded Unlock Michigan to energize citizens of the state to take a stand against covid lockdown policies that harmed small businesses and drove people to leave the state of Michigan. He mobilized over half a million Michiganders to speak out against Governor Whitmer’s oppressive mandates and lockdowns through a successful lawsuit. He is now taking that energy one step further by tossing his hat in the ring to become the Republican Party candidate.

Check out this interview with Mr. Soldano by Leah Wilson, Executive Director of Stand for Health Freedom to get a feel for why the primary is so important for government races across the nation.

Watch the Interview

Your choice for governor will affect the level of privacy you have for health decisions for your family. It will affect how you can school your children, and what they may learn. The decision impacts business, which drives job growth and eventually population in your state. Dr. Soldano explains how common sense solutions can hold the line in the state’s top office while citizens take back liberties that were stolen from us by federal pandemic policies. He knows that “America’s greatest asset is the people.”

So, who cares about primaries?

People who want their voices heard and their candidates in office care about primaries. Smart voters know their votes matter even more in primaries than in general elections.

Primaries give you the most bang for your buck.

  • Your vote has even more of an impact. Primaries historically have low voter turnout. If you cast a vote where 1 million people are voting, your one-in-a-million vote doesn’t weigh in as much as when you cast a vote with 1000 other people.
  • This is the best time to get one-on-one time with your candidate. During the primaries, the candidates want to talk with you. They want to hear what issues are important to the people they want to represent. The time to build relationships is now. Once your candidate is elected, they will be busy with bills and other duties of their office. Their time will be very limited and their focus pulled in many directions.
  • Your candidate will remember you helped get them there. Right now, a candidate’s focus is on the voters. While you get to know them, you will let them get to know you and how you can help them while they’re in office. Candidates are human, and humans are driven by relationships.
  • If you want your values represented in the general election, vote now. Primaries are the way political parties choose who runs in the general election. Many people simply vote along party lines. They trust their party chose the best person for the job, they assume their views are aligned with their party. They let the party do their thinking for them. But you know within a party there are many differing views. The primaries are the time to make sure your values and priorities are the focus of the candidates representing the party. The party’s priorities and positions for the general election are decided on in the primaries.

What do you do when you find a candidate you like?

When you find a candidate you like, support them. Donate to their campaign, go to or call their campaign office and ask how you can volunteer to help. Show up for them and show them how many others will do the same. When they are elected, they will remember your help and support. They will remember your passion for the issues and your ability to get engaged with the political process.

Health freedom is at the front of everyone’s mind after years of pandemic policy. We can use the primaries as leverage to shift the momentum in America back to respect for our health, our bodies, our privacy, our families, and our Constitution.

Take Action!

Go to our Vote for Health Freedom page, or Text the letters VHF to 52886, to learn about candidates in your area!
Vote for Health Freedom
Tell your candidates to take our Health Freedom Survey so we can support those who will stand for health freedom!
Candidate Survey

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

UK & US Data: COVID-19 “Vaccine”-Induced Fatality High & Israeli Ministry of Health Conducts “Vaccine” Survey: So Many Serious Events They Started Deleting Them

https://www.skirsch.com/covid/Seneff_costBenefit.pdf

COVID–19 and All–Cause Mortality Data by Age Group Reveals Risk of COVID Vaccine–Induced Fatality is Equal to or Greater than the Risk of a COVID death for all Age Groups Under 80 Years Old as of 6 February 2022.

Kathy Dopp, MS Mathematics and Stephanie Seneff, PhD
13 February 2022.

Abstract

As of 6 February 2022, based on publicly available official UK and US data, all age groups under 50
years old are at greater risk of fatality after receiving a COVID–19 inoculation than an unvaccinated
person is at risk of a COVID–19 death. All age groups under 80 years old have virtually no benefit from receiving a COVID–19 inoculation, and the younger ages incur significant risk. This analysis is
conservative because it ignores the fact that inoculation–induced adverse events such as thrombosis, myocarditis, Bell’s palsy, and other vaccine–induced injuries can lead to shortened life span. When one takes into consideration the fact that there is approximately a 90% decrease in risk of COVID–19 death if early treatment is provided to all symptomatic high–risk persons, one can only conclude that mandates of COVID–19 inoculations are ill–advised. Considering the emergence of antibody–resistant variants like Delta and Omicron, for most age groups COVID–19 vaccine inoculations result in higher death rates than COVID–19 does for the unvaccinated.

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • For those under age 18, “vaccination” increases their COVID death rate and they are 51 times more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 18 to 29 are 16 times more likely to die from COVID vaccination than to prevent one COVID death and are eight times more likely to die from vaccination than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 30 to 39 are 15 times more likely to die from COVID inoculation than to prevent one COVID death, and seven times more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 40 to 49 are nine times more likely to die from the COVID inoculation than likely to prevent one COVID death in this age group, and five times more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 50 to 59 are twice (two times) more likely to die from the COVID inoculation than to prevent one COVID death and are slightly more likely to die from the inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 60 to 79 are virtually equally likely to die from the COVID inoculation as to prevent one COVID death or die from COVID if not vaccinated.
  • Those aged 80+ are 0.13% less likely to die from the COVID inoculation than to die from COVID if not vaccinated.

____________________

https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/the-israeli-ministry-of-health-actually

The Israeli Ministry of Health Actually Did a Survey of Adverse Events after The Booster Dose

And it’s absolutely devastating

Well surprise, surprise. The Israeli Ministry of Health (MoH) conducted an actual survey of about two thousand people 3-4 weeks after they received the third (booster) shot of the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, asking them about the adverse events they experienced following vaccination. The results are absolutely devastating to the COVID-19 vaccine program and the push for vaccine mandates.  (See link for article)

SUMMARY:

  • While the Israeli public was told by ‘every talking head on TV and every newspaper’ that the shots were extremely safe, the MoH and CDC completely ignored the unambiguous and unprecedented safety signals emanating from VAERS and IMOH, both of which are known to have a huge problem of under-reported events. Further, they took a page from Big Pharma’s playbook by deliberately failing to gather data appropriately to reflect what was happening in reality.
  • MoH put up a Facebook post deriding all the “fake news” about side effects that was quickly flooded with thousands of comments from those who were harmed.
  • MoH apparently panicked and were ‘caught in the act’ of deleting hundreds if not thousands of comments by people reading the comments who took videos of them being deleted. There are currently 27,000 comments but it’s unknown how many were deleted.  ICAN just issued a FOIA request to the CDC for a VAERS report that seemingly disappeared without a trace about a two year old boy “began bleeding out of the mouth, eyes, nose and ears within 6 hours” after the Pfizer jab.
  • MoH never investigated why so many never got the 2nd dose, even though it cost them eligibility for the green pass and the right to work.
  • Israeli data played a starring role for the FDA advisory hearing on boosters, where they again assured the shots were extremely safe due to the fact they had received so few reports, even when the ones they did receive were determined not to be linked to the shots – including a woman who had a stroke immediately after the jab. 
  • The article then painstakingly goes through the important take-aways from the survey which shows high numbers being adversely affected, even requiring hospitalization, and had difficulty performing daily activities, developed neurological problems, experienced a worsening of symptoms in those with pre-existing autoimmune disorders, depression, or anxiety, disruptions to menstrual cycles, etc.
  • This chart shows the under reporting factor (URF) for four adverse events (if you can’t read it, go to top link of article): 
  • The results of this survey should have put an immediate end to government plans for boosters.
  • The article, through a chart, shows that a sizable percentage of adverse events began on the same day as the “vaccination,” but that those in charge who are denying any causality are engaged ‘in an exercise of ghoulish gaslighting,’ where they shouldn’t be able to sleep at night.
  • The survey doesn’t show the percentage of people who died within a month of being “vaccinated”
  • Based on v-safe data, the CDC reported an overall hospitalization rate within a week of the first dose of 0.1%, which was also the rate for people who received a booster and primary series all from Pfizer only.
    • 28% were unable to perform normal daily activities, or 22% of the ‘Pfizer only’ group (this compares to 29% in the MoH survey).
  • The article goes in-depth into numerous adverse events and it is worth your time to look at the charts.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses