Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

‘Gearing Up To Fight Biological Weapons?’ White House Launches $88 Billion National Biodefense Strategy. World Health Summit – More Global Censorship

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/biological-weapons-biden-biodefense-strategy/

‘Gearing up To Fight Biological Weapons?’ White House Launches $88 Billion National Biodefense Strategy

Biohazard symbol

The Biden administration on Tuesday announced a new $88 billion national biodefense strategy that outlines the government’s plans for how to respond to future pandemics, public health emergencies and biological threats.

The launch of the “National Biodefense Strategy and Implementation Plan for Countering Biological Threats, Enhancing Pandemic Preparedness, and Achieving Global Health Security” included the signing of National Security Memorandum-15 (NSM-15).

Key elements of the new strategy include the rapid production and distribution of vaccines and diagnostic tests, and enhancing global health security.

The strategy also includes a new framework for the federal government’s role during a future crisis, which places the White House at the center of any such response, coordinating the actions of multiple federal agencies.

The White House said the new strategy adopts lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

In an interview with The Defender, University of Illinois international law professor Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., a bioweapons expert who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, said:

“It appears that the enormous amount of money here, $88 billion over five years, when you add it on to well over, I would say, maybe $130 billion [in biodefense spending] since Sept. 11, 2001, means that they are gearing up to fight biological weapons warfare around the world.”

Boyle told The Defender that between October 2001 and October 2015, the federal government spent $100 billion “on biological warfare purposes.”

“To put that into perspective,” he said, “in constant dollars, the Manhattan Project to develop the atom bomb was $40 billion.”

Plan calls for development, distribution of new vaccines within 130 days

Biden’s new biodefense strategy includes the rapid development and deployment of new vaccines and diagnostics that it foresees in response to any future “biological threats.”

According to the White House’s plan, these “biological threats” may be “naturally occurring, accidental [or] deliberate,” “with the potential to significantly impact humans, animals (domestic and wildlife), plants, and the environment, and to negatively affect health, the economy, society, and security.”

According to STAT, the plan’s targets include:

  • Being able to test for new pathogens within 12 hours.
  • Making rapid tests available to the public within 90 days.
  • Repurposing existing drugs within 90 days.
  • Developing vaccines within 100 days.
  • Manufacturing enough of the new vaccine for the entire U.S. population within 130 days and “for the high-risk global population” within 200 days.
  • Developing new treatments within 180 days.

In justifying the new strategy, an unnamed senior Biden administration official quoted by The Hill said:

“We … know that the risk of another pandemic as bad or worse than COVID is a real threat. The new National Biodefense Strategy therefore outlines a bold vision … towards a world free of pandemics and catastrophic biological incidents.”

According to Defense One, other goals contained within the plan include “detecting the spread of pathogens before patients even begin to show symptoms like fever” and “scaling up the number of diagnostic test kits by tens of thousands within a week.”

A further element of the plan is “restoring community, the economy and the environment after a pandemic or biological incident,” The Hill reported.

The Biden administration’s plan also includes provisions for preparedness against the “accidental release of biological agents, and threats posed by terrorist groups or adversaries seeking to use biological weapons.”

Noting that COVID-19 “has highlighted that the United States and the world are vulnerable to biological threats, whether naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate,” the plan states:

“It is a vital interest of the United States to prepare for, prevent, detect, respond to, and recover from biological threats at home and abroad.

“Therefore, countering biological threats, advancing pandemic preparedness, and achieving global health security are top national and international security priorities for the United States.

“Moving forward, the United States must fundamentally transform its capabilities to protect our Nation from biological threats and advance pandemic preparedness and health security more broadly for the world.”

According to STAT, an unnamed senior Biden administration official said Tuesday, “One of the important things that COVID has taught us is that we need to be able to move much faster to counter pandemic threats, and we also need to be prepared for completely unknown threats.”

The same official said the plan includes “moonshot” targets that are not scientifically feasible presently, but potentially could be within a decade.

According to the official, these new developments can target the 26 families of viruses that infect humans, “many of which we are far less prepared for than coronaviruses.”

Will Congress fund it?

Some questioned the plan’s price tag and the willingness of Congress to approve its funding.

One of the elements of the new strategy is its connection to a March 2022 request to Congress for $88 billion in funding over five years for “pandemic preparedness and biodefense,” a request that has thus far “stalled.”

These monies are intended, in part, “to fund new research to predict outbreaks before they become pandemics,” and “accelerate rapid testing to get ahead of where viruses are moving,” Defense One said.

Some of this money will come from the baseline funding of the federal agencies involved in this strategy, but it’s unclear whether Congress has “much of an appetite for additional public health spending,” according to STAT, which noted that “Republicans in Congress have balked at recent requests for funding the ongoing monkeypox and COVID-19 responses.”

According to the White House, the new strategy “builds on USAID’s [U.S. Agency for International Development] announcement earlier this year committing $150 million to the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations to accelerate the development of life-saving vaccines and countermeasures against biological threats.”

The White House also included the $1.4 billion in “seed funding” it provided earlier this year to the “groundbreaking new Financial Intermediary Fund for Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response at the World Bank.”

Boyle described the $88 billion in projected funding over the next five years as “a dramatic escalation” with “no justification from legitimate scientific reasons.”

He noted that since 2015, the federal government has “allocated anywhere from $5 to $6 billion per year on biological warfare purposes, which, being conservative, would mean a sum total from Sept. 11, 2001, until now, of $135-$140 billion.”

In his view, this money is being allocated “into further expanding the U.S. biological warfare industry … for the purpose of waging biological warfare,” and instead “should have been spent on the public health of the American people.”

‘You find Tony Fauci behind all of it’

Part of the price tag for the new biodefense strategy appears to be directed toward “recruiting, training and sustaining a robust, permanent cadre of health workers in all 50 states,” in the words of a senior Biden administration official quoted by Reuters.

Referring to it as a “public health army,” STAT reported that this “cadre of health workers” will include “laboratory technicians, veterinarians, and community health workers — to not only better detect emerging diseases but respond to them.”

In turn, Defense One reported that the strategy “aims to boost the number of local healthcare workers” and “traditional frontline healthcare workers,” but also, many new positions “related to research and data collection,” including “expanding the CDC’s epidemiology field officer program” and “bringing more epidemiologists to every state.”

The Biden administration also said it is “committed to helping at least 50 countries strengthen their own local capacities,” “strengthening public health workforces both in the United States and globally” and “establishing international mechanisms to bolster laboratory safety,” according to STAT.

For some, “international mechanisms” may bring to mind the recent and ongoing efforts by the World Health Organization (WHO) to establish a renewed “global pandemic treaty” — efforts in which the United States under the Biden administration has played a leading role.

As previously reported by The Defender, the Biden administration expressed broad support for a “pandemic treaty” and previously headed negotiations on this issue.

In his interview with The Defender, Boyle also drew connections between the Biden administration’s new strategy, and efforts to develop the “pandemic treaty.”

Referring to the Biden administration’s recently signed executive order on “advancing biotechnology and biomanufacturing,” Boyle remarked that it makes mention of “dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens.”

For Boyle, “dual-use research” refers to the development of both “offensive and defensive biological weapons of warfare,” noting that “when it comes to biological warfare, defense means offense.”

“If they are saying they are doing all this for defensive purposes, it’s because they are also planning offensive use of biological warfare weapons, with the defense to defend themselves in the event that adversaries respond in kind,” Boyle added.

This then connects to the “pandemic treaty,” according to Boyle, noting that Dr. Anthony Fauci has close ties to the WHO’s executive committee:

“If you recall, Trump pulled us out of the WHO. The first act Biden did was to put us back into the WHO … and he appointed Tony Fauci as the U.S. government’s representative on the WHO executive committee.

“So the same guy supporting this ‘dual research of concern’ … is also implementing, supervising this new WHO treaty.”

Biden’s strategy also “calls for international mechanisms that can help strengthen lab safety and biosecurity practices around the world,” especially in light of “questions about the risks and benefits of research into potentially dangerous viruses,” including the COVID-19 Wuhan lab-leak theory.

This may indicate that Biden is seeking to expand gain-of-function research globally. As recently reported by The Defender, facilities conducting such research — including a facility where a purportedly “more lethal” strain of the COVID-19 Omicron variant was developed — are currently being expanded in the U.S.

Gain of function refers to the “manipulation of pathogens to make them more dangerous,” in the hope of “getting ahead of a future outbreak.”

As part of the new strategy, a “policy coordination structure for biodefense among government agencies with oversight by the White House” was signed, Reuters reported.

According to The Hill, this memorandum “outlines the coordination structure for biodefense across federal agencies, directs agencies to prioritize biodefense, directs the intelligence community to track evolving threat landscapes and ensures the government is continuously reviewing and adjusting priorities.”

Boyle, an outspoken critic of gain-of-function research, said it appears such research will be an integral part of the Biden administration’s new biodefense strategy. He told The Defender:

“It’s clear in the language that they are going full steam ahead on abusing DNA, genetic engineering, gain-of-function, synthetic biology, gene splicing, CRISPR-Cas9, to develop biological warfare weapons.”

He said that the proposed WHO pandemic treaty includes language on “measures to provide oversight and report on laboratories that do work to genetically alter organisms in order to increase pathogenicity and transmissibility.”

For Boyle, “this means gain-of-function work, using and abusing DNA engineering, synthetic biology, CRISPR-Cas9. That’s in the WHO treaty.”

“It all ties up,” Boyle added. “The executive order, the biodefense strategy, the WHO treaty. You find Tony Fauci behind all of it.”

Boyle added:

“When you add all this up together, it seems to me they’re gearing up to prepare to wage offensive biological warfare and preparing for the defense, for other states to respond with biological warfare weapons.”

Plan calls for coordination across federal agencies under White House control

The administration’s new biodefense strategy will utilize more than 20 federal agencies, while “oversight for the strategy will be at the White House, under the national security advisor.”

According to a  senior Biden administration official, the new strategy “directs the U.S. intelligence community to monitor for threats and ensure the United States ‘continuously adapts to this evolving threat landscape’ by holding annual exercises,” to “prevent epidemics and biological incidents before they happen,” Reuters reported.

This may bring to mind exercises and simulations that took place just prior to the COVID-19, monkeypox and anthrax outbreaks, which appeared to predict, with remarkable similarity, what was to follow.

According to Biden’s new strategy, the heads of the relevant federal agencies “shall implement the Biodefense Strategy, as well as related strategies such as the U.S. Global Health Security Strategy, and include biodefense-related activities … within their strategic planning and budgetary processes.”

Federal agencies also will be expected to coordinate with each other and with non-federal agencies on matters pertaining to “the biodefense enterprise.”

Is new strategy a ‘moonshot,’ or ‘pie-in-the-sky’?

In addition to questions about funding, some also questioned the feasibility of the new plan.

Defense One wrote that meeting some of the “moonshot” goals of the strategy “will require scaling up data-collection efforts at research facilities around the globe,” in addition to significantly ratcheting up a host of other research-related efforts, noting that the administration “did not specify exactly what technologies they will invest in.”

According to Defense One, “new approaches to RNA research” to “ease pandemics” may need to be developed, in addition to “new forms of plant-based vaccines” that could “allow for the scaling up of vaccine production by orders of magnitude.”

An unnamed senior Biden administration official quoted by Defense One acknowledged that the “moonshots” foreseen by the plan “are not possible today, but these capabilities can be achieved and are within our reach with the right resources over the next five to 10 years.”

Hiring more health workers may also prove challenging for the Biden administration due to a shortage of nurse practitioners that is expected to grow by 2025, along with looming “shortages of other healthcare workers.”

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

________________

Meanwhile, even pro-vaccine, mainstream doctors are calling for COVID advisors to be deposed:

http://

By Dr. Vinay Prasad

Oct. 2022

Speaking of “globalism” this explains a lot:

http://  Approx. 10 Min

Oct. 25, 2022

2022 World Health Summit

Only One Hedges on Medical Censorship

The rest truly believe the public is stupid

Rebel News’ Drea Humphrey discusses her reporting from this year’s World Health Summit in Berlin, Germany.  A number believe the public needs to have information censored.

Only one executive spoke up for healthy skepticism and “informed consent.”

Predictably the Rebel News journalists were asked to leave.

Visit http://RebelWHO.com to support our exclusive coverage of the 2022 World Health Summit.

Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story. https://www.RebelNews.com

SUMMARY:

  • All the topics align with the overarching theme – globalism
  • A Global Health Communications panel with top representatives from FB, Google, WHO, TikTok, Science Magazine, and “Women in Global Health” discussed Big Tech censorship – which the majority agree with
    • These morons believe they need to sift through information and decide what is truth because the public is stupid
    • WHO Director of Communications calls the “purveyors of lies,” “the bad guys,” and that they have more “seductive messages” than them – the supposed purveyors of truth.  She feels they need to “flood in accurate information to drown out the “vast tsunami of these compelling lies.”
    • The TikTok creator believes that using “prebunked videos” in ad space on YouTube served to inoculate audiences against “misinformation.” She believes platforms should be using people like her to make these “prebunked” videos and should be “sacrificing ad space” so “we can help get in there.” Remember YouTube has purged thousands of channels  to silence dissent.
    • The guy from Meta admits that this type of work is “consistent with partnerships we’ve had already with a lot of health organizations” proving the evil collusion many have suspected.
    • The executive director of the WHO health emergencies program, who was a very outspoken advocate of restrictions during lockdowns was careful to state they should not weaponize communications.  He advocated for skepticism of all information.  He appeared to be the only one in the room capable of logical thought or is simply controlled opposition.

Lastly, this 2 min. video explains digital currency and how all the dots connect:  https://mobile.twitter.com/roller2426/status/1558313162671534081

Dr. Christian Perronne Exonerated

https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/exonerated-in-france-one-persecuted-doctor-triumphs-over-covid-repression-

Exonerated! In France, One Persecuted Doctor Triumphs Over Covid Repression

Oct. 23, 2022

Dr. Christian Perronne in Paris on October 10 at an interview for RESCUE and TrialSite News(Mary Beth Pfeiffer)

PARIS—A prominent French physician has won a stunning victory against charges that he denigrated official covid policies, with the French Order of Physicians holding that he was in fact obliged to speak out.

In its ruling, the French governing body for doctors found that Christian Perronne, 67, acted in the best interest of citizens and his profession in critiquing covid treatments and vaccines on social media, in national television interviews, and in a best-selling book.

“Dr. Perronne, an internationally recognized expert in the field of infectious diseases, was best placed to understand public health issues,” the translated decision stated. “If he spoke in the press about the action of the government and the pharmaceutical industry—as he was legitimate to do and even had the obligation to do so in this area which fell within his competence—he confined himself to publicly, but without invective, a discordant voice on a subject of general interest.”

In March 2020, as covid was exploding, Perronne emailed me a hugely encouraging study by Dr. Didier Raoult on successful treatment of covid with an old antimalarial drug, hydroxychloroquine. We both thought covid could quickly be tamed. But when President Trump “fast-tracked” the drug a day after my article on Forbes.com, the safe, generic treatment began a slow and tragic slide toward mainstream ridicule and rejection.

Perronne went on to sharply criticize the French government’s covid approach, including in a highly successful book entitled Is there a mistake THEY didn’t make?: COVID-19: the sacred union of incompetence and arrogance. The book, and statements Perronne made in a whirlwind of media interviews, soon got him into trouble with French medical authorities, which he believes was at the behest of French President Emmanuel Macron.

“At the beginning I understood things were going in the wrong way,” Perronne told me. Having served for a decade as overseer, variously, of the nation’s communicable disease, health security, and vaccine review commissions, “I think I knew how to manage such problems.”

Among Perronne’s other qualifications, he was vice president of the European Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization for six years, which provides independent review and expertise on vaccines for the World Health Organization.  (See link for article)

__________________

**Comment**

You may recognize this doctor as I’ve posted about him before as he is an outspoken critic of how Lyme/MSIDS is being handled:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2018/03/15/french-government-announces-support-for-doctor-discretion-in-treating-lyme-msids/

He is also wildly critical of how COVID has been handled calling it “completely stupid and unethical”:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2021/08/19/covid-policy-is-completely-stupid-unethical-states-frances-vaccine-policy-chief-who-was-recently-fired-for-stating-this/

He also believes COVID “vaccinations” are causing harm.

“I’m very worried because we know that some people died a few days or a few weeks after the injection,” he said, adding that he personally knows of three deaths of young people, 17 to 20 years old. Add to that heart problems, strokes, excess non-covid deaths, possible sterility, and cancer.

“I have no scientific proof but what I can see from the U.S., different countries, and France, many oncologists are saying we never saw such a huge amount of cancer cases,” he told me. “Unfortunately, I don’t think all the statistics are reliable today, but it’s a signal.”

He has written a followup book titled Decidedly, THEY still haven’t understood anything!

Like so many other Lyme literate doctors Perronne was attacked simply for thinking for himself.  The establishment has an accepted narrative and woe to anyone who does not blindly parrot that narrative.  My own doctor was similarly attacked and had to spend nearly $50K to defend his medical practice which is why most LLMDs do not accept insurance as its often the insurance companies that turn these doctors in. Important quote:

“When a doctor runs out of money, his lawyers ask him to settle and stipulate and admit to certain things (he’s) done ‘wrong.’ The burden of proof is on the doctor, even when there are no complaints from patients.” ~ Dr. Robert Waters

Patients are doing well and are completely happy with their care but insurance companies hide cowardly behind the skirts of corrupt public health authorities whom are in bed with Big Pharma.

And the band plays on.

Lockdown & “Vaccine” Mandate Remorse? Too Little Too Late

Now that those which caused the devastation caused by tyrannical, worthless lockdowns and bacteria-laden, carcinogenic and oxygen depriving masks with the admission of probable aerosol transmission of the virus through floors and walls, plastic barriers, and shields which had ZERO effect on mortality, and which used untested pseudoscience to promote “social distancing” has blatantly and continually been shown, as well as  the serious adverse effects of the toxic, ineffective, mRNA gene therapy injections that continue to be shown, many are attempting to deflect blame, quietly remove informationrewrite history,  or ask for amnesty to cast themselves in a better light by uttering empty words.  Information continues to bubble out on how many are profiting from COVID, the injections, and FDA-approved treatments – even personally promoting certain drugs. The media has been paid at least $1 BILLION by our corrupt government that stooped to new lows to push shots that haven’t even been properly tested.

We have not been in this“all together,” and many have profited at the expense of others.

And GBS news commentator states:

“there should be zero [COVID] measures ever again.”

We have up to two years’ worth of data on most of the measures, and NONE has proven fruitful.

Instead, they’ve all been shown to be harmful — to economic stability, mental health, physical health, education, life expectancy, quality of life and more. The global response has been nothing short of disastrous, and following the same playbook is insanity.

For an excellent chronology by Dr. Vernon Coleman on the whole sordid affair, go here for “COVID-19: How the Greatest Crime in History Unfolded.”

http://

“I can apologize right now. I’m deeply sorry,” she said. She proceeded to give a heartfelt apology “for anyone who was inappropriately subjected to discrimination as a result of their vaccine status, I’m deeply sorry. For any government employee that was fired from their job, because of their vaccine status, and I welcome the back if they want to come back.” ~ United Conservative Party Leader Danielle Smith

Even more amazing than the heartfelt apology, Premier Smith said she was seriously considering granting a legal amnesty to any Albertans charged with lockdown offenses — as in, dropping all the charges.

It’s not surprising that Trudeau’s disinformation czar is trying to shut down Rebel News.

Sadly, here in the U.S. Biden is now touting grocery store coupons for people who get another dose of the COVID shots.

For more:

Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it.

Where are the Autopsies Post “Vax”? 5 New Studies & Is CDC Hiding Cancer Data Linked to Shots?

Back in April we learned that Public Health Mafia Overlord, Dr. Anthony Fauci, told our government to tell everyone NOT to do autopsies on COVID patients. Pathologists got the message. But as time wore on, more and more pathologists and doctors are demanding them due to the increase in sudden deaths (SADS) and the high amount of reports to VAERS after the COVID mRNA injections.

https://rumble.com/v1oandb-ryan-cole-is-the-only-pathologist-in-the-us-willing-to-test-for-the-vaccine  Video Here (Approx. 11 min)

Dr. Ryan Cole – only pathologist in the US willing to test for the COVID mRNA Injection “fingerprints”

October 16, 2022 
 
If you know someone who died post-vaccine and want to find out whether the person died from the vaccine, you’ll want to send the autopsy tissue samples to Dr. Cole to be examined. He’s likely the only pathologist in the US willing to do this work.
 
Dr. Cole states that pathologists come up to him regularly thanking him but will not step out to do this important work for fear of reprisal.
 
_____________________
 
 

Horowitz: 5 shocking new studies and data points that nuke the COVID shots

Oct. 4, 2022

“In summary, we have highlighted the pitfalls of having considered until now COVID-19 mRNA vaccines as just conventional vaccines, and we have indicated the preclinical, clinical and post-marketing safety assessments that are most urgently needed. COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are actually pharmaceutical drugs, and consequently their pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, and possibly also their pharmacogenetics, must be properly characterized to provide a solid background of knowledge for their rational and targeted use, thus stopping ‘playing dice’ with these products due to the misbelief that the same vaccine at the same dose is good for everyone, and that adverse effects occur just by chance.

Those were the words of Italian researchers in a recent pharmacological analysis of the COVID shots published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences nearly two years after these products were foisted upon 5.35 billion human beings – often multiple times – under the false pretense of the jabs acting like vaccines. Who will be held accountable?

Every day, news pours out about the lack of safety and ineffectiveness of the shots, but they fail to move the needle on policy. It is unclear what it will take to get these biological agents pulled from the market, but here are some of the most recent bombshells proving the shots are extremely unsafe and ineffective.  (See link for article)

____________________

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/cdc-cancer-deaths-covid-vaccines-cola/

Is CDC Hiding Data Showing Cancer Deaths Linked to COVID Vaccines?

Analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report data suggests the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been filtering and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID-19 deaths since April 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.

10/18/22

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
 

Story at a glance:

  • Analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report data suggests the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been filtering and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID-19 deaths since April 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.
  • The signal is being hidden by swapping the underlying cause of death with main cause of death.
  • Uncontrollable turbo-charged cancers the medical establishment had never seen before only started to occur after the rollout of the COVID-19 jabs.
  • Before it was manipulated to eliminate the safety signal, data from the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database, or DMED, showed cancer rates among military personnel and their families tripled after the rollout of the shots.
  • After the rollout of the COVID-19 jabs in 2021, cancer patients have gotten younger, with the largest increase occurring among 30- to 50-year-olds, tumor sizes are dramatically larger, multiple tumors in multiple organs are becoming more common, and recurrence and metastasis are increasing.

In a series of Twitter posts, The Ethical Skeptic — self-described as a former intelligence officer and strategist — has laid out a series of charts illustrating how cancer deaths are being mislabeled as COVID-19 deaths.

The suspicion is that this is an effort to hide the fact that the COVID-19 shots have resulted in soaring cancer rates.

The Ethical Skeptic also takes a deep dive into the data in “Houston, We Have a Problem, Part 1,” on TheEthicalSkeptic.com.

As noted in his article, seven out of the 11 International Classification of Diseases, or ICD, codes tracked by the U.S. National Center for Health Statistics — including cancer — saw sharp upticks starting in the first week of April 2021.

“This date of inception is no coincidence, in that it also happens to coincide with a key inflection point regarding a specific body-system intervention in most of the U.S. population,” The Ethical Skeptic notes.

In other words, April 2021 was when large swaths of the American population were getting their first COVID-19 jabs.

Cancer diagnoses on the rise

The following graph, highlighted on Dr. Jennifer Brown’s Substack, illustrates the cyclical wave pattern of cancer diagnoses, from January 2015 and October 1.

As noted in the top-right text box:

“We should be at or near a seasonal nadir. Instead, we are at an all-time CA [cancer] excess, and heading up. Keep in mind there is substantial lag to CA reporting, so this likely under-represents true excess.”

At no point during the past seven years have we seen this rate of new cancer diagnoses.

Are the COVID-19 shots to blame? 

Probably, unless we can identify another widespread environmental factor or exposure that was introduced to the population, en masse, in early 2021, that didn’t exist before.

cancer diagnosis on the rise
Credit: Dr. Jennifer Brown

CDC fudging death records to eliminate cancer signal

According to The Ethical Skeptic’s analysis of U.S. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report data, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been filtering and redesignating cancer deaths as COVID-19 deaths since Week 14 of 2021 to eliminate the cancer signal.

The following two charts, posted on Twitter on October 1 and 2, illustrate how cancer mortality is being artificially suppressed.

As explained by The Ethical Skeptic:

“The set dynamics are complex, but the principle is straightforward. When a death cert lists Cancer as the UCoD [underlying cause of death] and COVID as MCoD [main cause of death] — the UCoD & MCoD are being swapped, and COVID is being listed as the UCoD 100% (425/wk).

cancer mortality
Source: The Ethical Skeptic

“This results in 20% of all COVID deaths each week, also happening to be persons dying of Cancer — which is egregiously higher than it should be. This is clear over-attribution = equates to exactly the difference between the Cancer and All Other ICD-10 code lag curves.”

“The problem facing the CDC, is … What does one do when COVID Mortality is no longer substantial enough to conceal the excess Cancer Mortality?”

lag deviation versus normalized trend
Source: The Ethical Skeptic

So, to rephrase, what The Ethical Skeptic is saying is that 20% of the weekly so-called COVID-19 deaths are actually cancer deaths, which is rather astounding.

But swapping the underlying and main causes of death, listing COVID-19 as the main cause, hides (to some degree) the fact that cancer deaths are going through the roof.

According to his analysis, the COVID-19 shot is killing 7,300 Americans per week.

COVID-19, meanwhile, is killing 1,740 people.

So, what will the CDC blame when COVID-19 disappears and they can no longer swap the underlying and main cause of death designations?

Department of Defense data showed massive cancer rise

Uncontrollable turbo-charged cancers the medical establishment had never seen before only started to occur after the rollout of the COVID-19 jabs.

Data from the DMED exposed by attorney Tom Renz and Sen. Ron Johnson (above), showed cancer rates among military personnel and their families basically tripled after the rollout of the shots.

As you may recall, within days of the DMED data being revealed, the database was taken offline, allegedly to “identify and correct” a supposed data corruption problem, and when it came back, the data had been altered to hide these glaringly obvious safety signals.

‘Turbo-cancers’ emerged after COVID jab rollout

In the video above, Swedish pathologist, researcher, and senior physician at Lund’s University, Dr. Ute Kruger, describes the changes she has personally observed in the wake of the COVID-19 shots.

For example, she’s noticed:

  • Cancer patients are getting younger — The largest increase is among 30- to 50-year-olds.
  • Tumor sizes are dramatically larger — Historically, 3-centimeter tumors were commonly found at the time of cancer diagnosis. Now, the tumors they’re finding are regularly 4 to 12 centimeters, which suggests they’re growing at a much faster rate than normal.
  • Multiple tumors in multiple organs are becoming more common.
  • Recurrence and metastasis are increasing — Kruger points out that many of the cancer patients she’s seeing have been in remission for years, only to suddenly be beset with uncontrollable cancer growth and metastasis shortly after their COVID-19 jab.

These “turbo-cancers,” as Kruger calls them, cannot be explained by delayed cancer screenings due to lockdowns and other COVID-19 restrictions, as those days are long gone.

Patients, despite having access to medical screenings as in years past, are showing up with grossly exacerbated tumor growths, and she believes this is because the cancers are being “turbo-charged” by the mRNA jabs.

Dr. Ryan Cole has also discussed the explosion of cancer (see video below). He believes the shots are primarily accelerating already existing cancers, by way of immune dysregulation.

He noticed that cancers that could normally be controlled and kept in check, giving the patient several years of quality life, once they got the COVID-19 jab, the cancer would suddenly grow out of control and rapidly lead to death.

Data are so corrupted, will we ever get to the truth?

The sad reality is that most data sources have at this point been so corrupted, it’s unlikely we’ll ever be able to get the whole truth.

The CDC started manipulating the data in 2020 and hasn’t stopped. DMED, which has historically been one of the best and most pristine, has now been modified. Other data sources have suffered the same fate.

It’s beyond egregious, and data modelers like The Ethical Skeptic show just how bad the situation is.

The idea that the CDC is massaging statistics to hide clear danger signals is appalling and unethical in the extreme, yet that’s what we’re seeing.

The question is, why do they go to such lengths to protect such a lethal product?

Your guess is as good as mine.

Originally published by Mercola.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Children’s Health Defense.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

___________________

For more:

**Comment**
 
I’ve posted prolifically on the urgent need to break the public health monopoly which is completely overriding medicine as we know it.  I also recently posted about the Federation of State Medical Boards which is a very influential, private, nonprofit that censors and punishes physicians, attacks alternative medicine, and contributed to the opioid crisis by only supporting pharma-friendly establishment views.  This monolith is behind the AMA, APhA, and ASHP going after doctors for spreading “misinformation,” which is anything that defies the Big-Pharma, government narrative.
 
The lack of pathology on those dying after COVID injections is reminiscent of the lack of pathology on those dying after a Lyme/MSIDS diagnosis. 
Without this important work, nothing will change.
The monopolization of medicine will end health freedom and Lyme/MSIDS patients will be dramatically affected if it isn’t stopped.

New Study: Pretty Much Everyone Is Getting Heart Damage From COVID Shots

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-shows-that-pretty-much

New study shows that pretty much everyone is getting heart damage from the COVID vaccines

They just aren’t letting you know that. In Canada, the medical community is very smart about this: they don’t let doctors measure troponin levels before you are vaccinated so nobody is the wiser.

Executive summary

A new study shows that nearly everyone getting the mRNA COVID vaccines are experiencing some amount of heart damage.

Introduction

Watch this episode from Vinay Prasad before YouTube censors it.

You only need to look at 6:21 into the video:

A new study out of Switzerland shows that vaccinated people have uniformly higher troponin levels than their unvaccinated peers.

In the graph shown at 6:21, we see that the 777 people who got the booster in this study have uniformly higher troponin levels than their matched unvaccinated peers. That is not supposed to happen. If the vaccines are safe, the troponin levels should be nearly identical between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.

Here are Professor Prasad’s exact words:

It’s not just the tip of the distribution that has elevated high sensitivity troponin, it’s that the entire distribution is right shifted. Everybody’s having a little bit of elevation in high sensitivity troponin. That’s what this graph would have you infer.

You get a troponin elevation when there is damage to your heart:

Troponin is a type of protein found in the muscles of your heart. Troponin isn’t normally found in the blood. When heart muscles become damaged, troponin is sent into the bloodstream. As heart damage increases, greater amounts of troponin are released in the blood

What the study shows is that nearly everyone is getting a little heart damage when they get the COVID vaccine, some get a lot more damage than others.  (See link for article)

__________________

SUMMARY:

  • Actual damage is likely much higher as they are measuring on days 3 & 4 when the slope is going down.
  • The article mentions the Thailand study, summarized in the video, which showed 1 in 28 boys developed subclinical myocarditis.  It also showed that 1 in 43 teens got myocarditis. Nearly 30% had cardiac symptoms.
    • Anish Koka MD (Cardiology) really digs into the Thailand data and points out that it has long ago been established that the messenger RNA vaccines cause myocarditis.  This is the real punchline:
I can assure you, and the mostly ER doctor contingent on twitter that brays about “mild myocarditis”, that there are no cardiologists who want to see their child have a cardiac troponin that is 2x normal or 40x normal after administration of some therapeutic.

It is absolutely head-spinning to see that the public conversation now is geared to dismiss cardiac injury in young healthy children as “mild”. ~ Dr. Anish Koka

  • Dr. Linda Wastila also asks why are we accepting myocarditis as an acceptable side effect after the COVID shots.
  • Kirsch points out that it’s highly likely the study author, Professor Christian Mueller, a highly respected scientist, will face attacks on the study due to his findings.
  • Canada is simply not letting doctors measure troponin levels before the shots are given.  Ignorance after all, is bliss.  Levels can only be checked if someone is admitted to the hospital, so no comparisons can be made.
“Authorities”, once again, are turning a blind eye to science, data, and reality.

For more: