Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

New Report on COVID Origin, Wuhan Lab Unsafe, No Amnesty for “Pandemic” Authoritarians

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2022/11/03/synthetic-origin-of-sars-cov-2

Genetic Fingerprint Reveals Synthetic Origin of SARS-CoV-2

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
Nov. 3, 2022

Story at-a-glance

  • According to new research, the chance of SARS-CoV-2 having a natural origin is less than 1 in 100 million. SARS-CoV-2 has a telltale signature of genetic engineering, not previously identified
  • That genetic fingerprint suggests the work of Ralph Baric, Ph.D., was used in the creation of the virus. There’s a direct match between Baric’s published research — which describes how to hide telltale signs of genetic engineering — and the genetics found in SARS-CoV-2
  • In 2002, Baric invented a technique called seamless ligation, which conceals all evidence of genetic engineering in lab-created pathogens. Baric’s nickname for this technique is the “no-see’m method.” Baric taught the method to Shi Zhengli in 2016, and Shi and her colleagues at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) demonstrated mastery of Baric’s technique in a series of gain-of-function experiments
  • However, while seamless ligation conceals human tampering in lab-created pathogens, the method leaves a signature of its own, and that’s the signature discovered in SARS-CoV-2
  • The findings raise the possibility of liability for the University of North Carolina where Baric works, the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which funded Baric, the WIV and other parties

According to new research, the chance of SARS-CoV-2 having a natural origin is less than 1 in 100 million.1,2 The paper3 was posted on the preprint server BioRxiv October 20, 2022.

(Go here for article)

_________________

**Comment**

The authors of this research (Alex Washburne, Valentin Bruttel, and Antonius VanDongen) are not alone.  Alexis Baden-Mayer also wrote an illuminating article that points to SARS-CoV-2 being a chimera from Chimerica bioweapon for the purpose of creating:

The author points out that the very people behind it all are limiting our understanding by framing the origins of COVID as either a natural “spillover” from an animal “reservoir” or a lab “accident,” and either the work of the China or the U.S. when Event 201, and the history of the U.S. biological weapons program reveal a far more complex and evil scenario.

_________________

http:// Approx. 8 Min

Lab Leak MOST LIKELY Origin For COVID; Report Reveals UNSAFE Conditions At Wuhan Lab

Oct. 31, 2022

The Rising covers the information presented in the top article on the origins of COVID. Further, the commentator brings up an article in The Atlantic calling for “Amnesty” for “Pandemic” Authoritarians.  An excellent article covers this notion:

https://www.activistpost.com/2022/11/you-murderous-hypocrites-outrage-ensues-after-the-atlantic-suggests-amnesty-for-pandemic-authoritarians

“You Murderous Hypocrites”: Outrage Ensues After The Atlantic Suggests “Amnesty” For Pandemic Authoritarians

November 2, 2022

By Tyler Durden

The Atlantic has come under fire for suggesting that all the terrible pandemic-era decisions over lockdowns, school closures, masking, and punishing an entire class of people who questioned the efficacy and wisdom of taking a rushed, experimental vaccine – for a virus with a 99% survival rate in most, should all be water under the bridge.

“We need to forgive one another for what we did and said when we were in the dark about COVID,” writes Brown Professor Emily Oster – a huge lockdown proponent, who now pleads from mercy from the once-shunned.

“Let’s acknowledge that we made complicated choices in the face of deep uncertainty, and then try to work together to build back and move forward,” she continues.

Except, they weren’t “in the dark” about Covid.  There were numerous sources pointing out the actual science that ran contrary to the mandate claims, and they were deliberately silenced by a vast media campaign.  Evidence suggests that media platforms worked in tandem with Big Tech, the CDC and the Biden Administration.  It was not a simple matter of overreaction, there was collusion to remove all counter-information.  

Nice try, Emily.

Important excerpt:

The problem was not people’s ignorance of the facts, it was the organized antagonism and censorship against anyone presenting data that was contradictory to the mandate agenda. This is setting aside proclamations like those from the LA Times, which argued that mocking the deaths of “anti-vaxxers” might be necessary and justified.  After two years of this type of arrogant nonsense it’s hard to imagine people will be willing to pretend as if all is well.

The active effort to shut down any opposing data is the root crime, though, and no, it can never be forgotten or forgiven.

People are livid…

(See link for article)

__________________

UPDATE: Hear Dr. Vinay Prasad  as of 10/24:

“I don’t believe in forgiveness because in my opinion, these pieces of sh*t are still lying…”

https://dailycaller.com/2022/11/02/no-mercy-quarter-time-to-crush-branch-covidians  Nov. 2, 2022

No Mercy, No Quarter: It’s Time To Crush The Branch Covidians

Fifteen days to slow the spread turned into, please forget we stripped you of your human dignity.

Those with gatekeeping powers, which they used to kick families off flights and deny Americans with disabilities public services also include government officials, doctors, and celebrities who instructed their followers to cut ties with relatives who refused to wear masks or take the vaccine. And they listened. Uncles were uninvited from meeting their nephews, parents disowned their children, and grandparents died alone in nursing homes.  They threw decades of medical knowledge out the window and replaced it with political propaganda, like proposing people double-mask, while admitting probable aerosol transmission of the virus through floors and walls, closing elementary schools, and dropping patients from the organ donor list. Sadly, there were many who lost all humanity by rejoicing in the deaths or belittling those who didn’t wear masks or get vaccinated.  After virtue-signaling many of these poor souls are ill or dead. (See link for article)

Those who had good reasons not to mask or get the COVID shots were completely vilified and their reasons ignored.  This is not OK.
Medicine and research has been completely destroyed.  Doctors lost:
  1. Professional Autonomy – Doctors lost control of their practices and turned them over to corporations and large insurance companies.
  2. Their Scientific Roots
  3. Their Ethical Mooring – “We are seeing the complete destruction of medical ethics — without which you don’t have a profession.” ~ Dr. Richard Amerling

_________________

Important point from the Activist Post article:

One cannot help but notice that the timing of the Atlantic’s appeal for passive forgetfulness coincides with the swiftly approaching midterm election….

And bingo, you have your answer.

The report by Vanity Fair and ProPublica that published simultaneously with the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Minority Committee’s report last week referenced a 2019 biosafety incident at the Wuhan lab which is “under the thumb of the party state” to produce scientific breakthroughs whatever the cost.  This article states efforts are underway to “build on the lessons of the COVID-19 pandemic and make key data more granular and available much more quickly.”

Lessons can not be learned until fault is admitted and that is not forthcoming.

A great example: Biden now claims he “Beat Big Pharma,” when reality paints a far different picture since he mandated unsafe, ineffective, untested toxic gene therapy shots on millions using taxpayer’s money, even going so far as bribing the public into taking shots which don’t stop transmission, infection, severe hospitalization, or death, and have negative efficacy.  Big Pharma is raking in the profits. The FDA has repeatedly mislead, deceived, colluded and defrauded.  And now, FDA commissioner Dr. Robert Califf is personally pushing Pfizer drugs, once again clearly demonstrating a huge breach of ethics.  Corrupt public health has mandated ineffective and dangerous lockdowns and masks which have been found to contain a 2B carcinogen.

The current regime has denied sick patients effective, cheap, safe, life-saving treatments for COVID while approving ineffective, expensive, toxic Big Pharma drugs – again allowing Big Pharma to rake in profits.

This isn’t beating pharma this is aiding and abetting it.

Patients and doctors haven’t had any recourse other than through the court system.  The CARES Act destroyed patient and doctor rights and insured hospitals would only use government approved treatments by giving them kick-backs.  Dissenters have been singled out and mistreated by their own family members and neighbors.  In short, a new form of segregation is allowed and encouraged.

Those entrusted with public health haven’t only failed miserably, they are directly behind the mistreatment of others – including very real segregation, and continue to lie, deceive, manipulate, and push a faulty narrative at all costs despite truth to the contrary – and causing irreparable harm and death.  ICAN just published the fact that the CDC didn’t even bother to collect data on 15 adverse reactions of interest linked to the COVID shots including myocarditis, blood clots, thombocytopenia, and others that are known to occur.

As the old saying goes, “You commit the crime, you do the time.“
  1. First, you can not forgive someone who doesn’t recognize and admit they were wrong. 
  2. Second, you can not forgive someone who hasn’t truly asked for forgiveness, clearly understanding and admitting they were wrong. 
  3. And third, just because someone has the grace to forgive doesn’t absolve the perpetrator from the consequences of their actions (do the time, get fired, pay restitution, etc) and making things right so the crime isn’t repeated in the future. Punishment should teach lessons.
Amnesty for perpetrators of the ‘Plandemic’ would only allow for it to all happen again.

Everything being said by our corrupt public health authorities demonstrates they are not admitting fault.  They want to blame “messaging,” when there are far more important issues such as completely ignoring the Constitution, censoring, banning, and persecuting dissenters, colluding with Big Media, Big Pharma, and Big Tech, overriding our medical/individual rights and privacy for informed consent, not to mention experimenting upon the American public, and much, much more.

Lessons are obviously not being learned as Boston University, funded by NIAID, recently created a deadly new COVID strain with an 80% kill rate in rats.  According to Dr. James Lyons-Weiler:

“The Omicron S-bearing virus robustly escapes vaccine-induced humoral immunity, mainly due to mutations in the receptor binding motif (RBM)”

These words will ring in minds of those in NIAID and CDC and everyone who pushed the spike-only vaccines.

This proves that spike-only “vaccines” caused vaccine escape.
Are our corrupt public authorities admitting this inconvenient truth?  (Answer: no)

Another example of not admitting fault is the continued use of FDA-approved Paxlovid when it is actually connected with a “rebound effect,”  and toxicity that can sometimes cause deadly blood clots which of course will muddy the waters further as the COVID shots are also linked to deadly blood clots leading to heart damage.  How convenient for the guilty.

Yet another example of not learning any lessons is Australia’s bright idea to inject cows with the mRNA gene therapy shot with the spike protein so farmers can remain in business.  Nearly 2 in 10 cows DIED almost instantly.  It is known the toxic spike protein goes systemically into the body shortly after injection which means all diary products and meat will be affected, thereby affecting humans consuming these things.

Payouts for Covid-19 shot injuries in humans are set to explode more than 80-fold to nearly $77 millionby July next year, Australia’s budget papers reveal.  The figure was quietly buried in the Services Australia portfolio budget statement, in a table detailing third-party payments from the agency “on behalf of other entities.” Other figures show that out of 2987 people to apply for compensation, only 59 were successful, with experts describing the rate of payouts as “absolutely pitiful”.  A large survey on tens of thousands of Ausies shows they regret getting the COVID shots.

Does it sound like anyone has learned any lessons?  Anyone admitting fault?

No Dice. No Amnesty!

http://

Oops, Sorry!

Nov. 1, 2022

mRNA Speed of Science Song

“It’s the jab that never did work.”

From the author:

The phrase “speed of science” inspired me to re imagine this classic folk song. American folk music has an incredibly rich history…it was all about telling stories that resonated with people and challenging the status quo. Who’s doing that today? I’m trying to, at least. How many classics do I have to hurl at the algorithm to break through the wall? I guess we’ll have to see. Plot twist: the extreme censorship I’ve experienced ended up inspiring my best work. Please share this and support if you can.

The spike Girls also recently created the powerful parody “The Sound of Silenced Science”.

Go here for an excellent article and here for an excellent news story on how COVID dictators are pleading for amnesty yet are guilty of lying about virtually every aspect of COVID that cost the public their freedoms, their jobs, their educations, and only promoted hatred and segregation.

The treatment of the unvaccinated was unbelievable.

http://  Approx. 6 Min

COVID – 1984

The unvaccinated serve as the control group for this nefarious experiment on humanity and have put up with bullying, discrimination, and segregation. Mistakes were NOT made.  Don’t let them get away with it.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Masks Now Found to Contain 2B Carcinogen

**UPDATE Nov. 2022**

Research now indicates probable aerosol transmission of the virus through floors and walls proving the futility of porous masks.

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServer/Public/2022/October/PDF/titanium-dioxide-detected-in-masks-pdf.pdf

Masks Now Found to Contain 2B Carcinogen

Analysis by Dr. Joseph Mercola Fact Checked
Oct. 26, 2022
Story at-a-glance
  • In a study of 12 face masks, every mask contained titanium dioxide (TiO2) particles in at least one layer, at levels that “exceeded the acceptable exposure level”
  • The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies titanium dioxide as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means it’s “possibly carcinogenic to humans” by inhalation
  • A meta-analysis called for a rethinking of nano-TiO2 safety, citing numerous toxic effects in humans and aquatic animals
  • Masks take both a physical and psychological toll; the journal Pediatrics highlighted the emotional burden felt by parents, clinicians and patients due to wearing masks in pediatric cancer wards
  • YouTube has updated its policies about what constitutes “misinformation” and now allows you to say masks don’t work

The face masks that were supposed to protect your health may turn out to be detrimental to it, as increasing evidence points to toxins within their fibers. Titanium dioxide is one such toxin, one that’s particularly troubling in face masks because it’s a suspected human carcinogen when inhaled.1

Not only have adults been unwittingly exposed to this likely cancer-causing substance due to widespread mask mandates put in place during the pandemic, but so too have children, whose bodies are especially vulnerable to toxic influences. Coupled with evidence suggesting that mask mandates and use did not lower the spread of COVID-19,2 forced mask mandates become all the more atrocious.

Group 2B Carcinogen Detected in Masks

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classifies titanium dioxide as a Group 2B carcinogen, which means it’s “possibly carcinogenic to humans” by inhalation.3 Prior to the pandemic, this occurred primarily in occupational settings during the production of titanium dioxide powders or in the manufacture of products containing the substance.

There’s also been some concern about spray-on (aerosolized) sunscreens, hair color sprays and cosmetic powders containing microscopic particles of titanium dioxide that could be inhaled.

Specifically, the state of California includes titanium dioxide in the form of airborne particles measuring 10 micrometers or less on its Proposition 65 list, stating, “Titanium dioxide (airborne, unbound particles of respirable size) is on the Proposition 65 list because it can cause cancer. Exposure to titanium dioxide may increase the risk of cancer.”4

Despite the fact that titanium dioxide’s carcinogenicity when inhaled is well-known, the compound is commonly used in face mask textiles to improve stability to ultraviolet light and for use as a white colorant and matting agent.

Nanoparticle technology is also being used in face masks, and nanofibers containing titanium dioxide have been used to make antimicrobial filters, often in combination with silver and graphene, while titanium dioxide nanoparticle coatings may also be applied to cotton fabric to enhance antibacterial properties.5

Not only have adverse effects been reported in animal studies involving inhalation of titanium dioxide particles,6 but a team of researchers warned of “possible future consequences caused by a poorly regulated use of nanotechnology in textiles,” expanding on potential human health and environmental effects:7

“Although originally classified as biologically inert, there is a growing body of evidence on the toxicity of TiO2 [titanium dioxide] to humans and non-target organisms … Artificial sweat was also used to test the concentration of the silver and TiO2 released from fabrics. The release rate was found to depend on the concentration of nanomaterials in the fabric and the pH of sweat.”

A meta-analysis published in the journal Small, which focuses on science at the nano- and microscale, also called for a rethinking of nano-TiO2 safety, citing numerous toxic effects in humans and aquatic animals:8

“Genotoxicity, damage to membranes, inflammation and oxidative stress emerge as the main mechanisms of nano-TiO2 toxicity. Furthermore, nano-TiO2 can bind with free radicals and signal molecules, and interfere with the biochemical reactions on plasmalemma [cell membrane].

At the higher organizational level, nano-TiO2 toxicity is manifested as the negative effects on fitness-related organismal traits including feeding, reproduction and immunity in aquatic organisms.”

TiO2 in Masks Exceeds ‘Acceptable’ Exposure Level

In a study published in Scientific Reports, researchers tested the amount of titanium — used as a proxy for TiO2 particles — in 12 face masks meant to be worn by the public, including single-use disposable varieties as well as reusable masks. The masks were made of various materials, including synthetic fibers like polyester and natural fibers, such as cotton.9

Every mask contained titanium dioxide particles in at least one layer, although they weren’t found in cotton fibers or meltblown nonwoven fabrics. Generally, the amount of titanium dioxide particles in nonwoven fabrics was lower — by a factor of 10 — than in polyester and polyamide fibers. Further, all of the masks except one contained TiO2 nanoparticles, which present an elevated inhalation hazard.

Nanosized particles are typically described as being less than 100 nanometers (nm). The median size of the titanium dioxide particles in the masks ranged from 89 to 184 nm.10 Based on a model in which face masks are “worn intensively,” the study found that exposure to titanium dioxide “systematically exceeded the acceptable exposure level to TiO2 by inhalation (3.6 µg).”

On Twitter, Federico Andres Lois shared, “The best (lowest contamination) has more than 5 times the acceptable limit. Ohh and by the way, you are forcing your kid to breathing through it.”11 This, the researchers concluded, calls for in-depth research to avoid adverse effects:12

“[T]hese results urge for in depth research of (nano)technology applications in textiles to avoid possible future consequences caused by a poorly regulated use and to implement regulatory standards phasing out or limiting the amount of TiO2 particles, following the safe-by-design principle.”

How Masks Make You Sick

The potential consequences of breathing in carcinogenic particles from face masks worn during the COVID-19 pandemic won’t be known for years, but red flags have been raised from the beginning that face mask usage has consequences, with no meaningful benefit.

Dr. Zacharias Fögen conducted a study to find out whether mandatory mask use influenced the COVID-19 case fatality rate in Kansas from August 1 to October 15, 2020.13 He chose the state of Kansas because, while it issued a mask mandate, counties were allowed to either opt in or out of it.

His analysis revealed that counties with a mask mandate had significantly higher case fatality rates than counties without a mask mandate. “These findings suggest that mask use might pose a yet unknown threat to the user instead of protecting them, making mask mandates a debatable epidemiologic intervention,” he concluded.

That threat, he explained, may be something called the “Foegen effect” — the idea that deep reinhalation of droplets and virions caught on facemasks might make COVID-19 infection more likely or more severe.

Fögen explained that wearing masks could end up increasing your overall viral load, because instead of exhaling virions from your respiratory tract and ridding your body of them, those virions are caught in the mask and returned. This might also have the effect of increasing the number of virions that pass through the mask, such that it becomes more than the number that would have been shed without a mask. According to Fögen:14

“The fundamentals of this effect are easily demonstrated when wearing a facemask and glasses at the same time by pulling the upper edge of the mask over the lower edge of the glasses. Droplets appear on the mask when breathing out and disappear when breathing in.

In the ‘Foegen effect,’ the virions spread (because of their smaller size) deeper into the respiratory tract. They bypass the bronchi and are inhaled deep into the alveoli, where they can cause pneumonia instead of bronchitis, which would be typical of a virus infection.

Furthermore, these virions bypass the multilayer squamous epithelial wall that they cannot pass into in vitro and most likely cannot pass into in vivo. Therefore, the only probable way for the virions to enter the blood vessels is through the alveoli.”

A 2021 report focused on health, safety and well-being of face mask usage15 further noted potential permanent physical damage to the lungs caused by fibrosis from inhalation of fibrous nanoparticles.

“There are real and significant dangers of respiratory infection, oral health deterioration and of lung injury, such as pneumothorax, owing to moisture build-up and also exposure to potentially harmful levels of an asphyxiant gas (carbon dioxide [CO2]) which can cause serious injury to health,” the authors explained.16

Masks Take an Extreme Psychological Toll

The physical repercussions are only one aspect to consider, as the psychological consequences of mask mandates are also severe. The journal Pediatrics recently highlighted the burden felt by parents, clinicians and patients in pediatric cancer wards when they were forced to wear masks.17

Hidden by face masks, clinicians felt powerless to display empathy and compassion during the most difficult conversations with their patients and their families. Wrote one clinician, who had to deliver devastating health news about the child of a friend:18

“My mask covered my expression. Perhaps the only way she could have known just how devastated I was to learn of this news was by the tears welling up in my eyes. My natural response was to wrap my arms around my friend and tell her everything would be okay. ‘I will help you, I will fix her, I will do everything in my power to make this go away.’

But how do I show you when my words are muffled by the mask? How can I softly share my words of condolence when I am struggling to catch enough air myself through the 3 layers of fabric? How does anyone break this kind of awful news with personal protective gear creating a barrier between doctor and patient?”

The children were also affected, as they couldn’t see their parents’ faces during a time when they needed them most. Wrote one parent:19

“When a policy change mandated that parents be masked 24/7 while in the hospital, my child was furious. She would rip the mask off my face and, if it was a paper mask, would pull off the strings so it could not be worn again. ‘I need to see my mommy’ she told me, along with ‘I need kisses to make me feel better and you can’t kiss me with a mask.’”

A 2021 psychology report20 also stated that masks are likely to be causing psychological harm to children and interfering with development.21 “The extent of psychological harm to young people is unknown,” the report stated, “due to the unique nature of the ‘social experiment’ currently underway in schools, and in wider society.”22

YouTube Now Lets You Say Masks Don’t Work

You may recall that countless public figures have been deplatformed by multiple social media and other online outlets for speaking out against the narrative, including the misguided notion that masks were useful for reducing COVID-19 cases.23 Indeed, it wasn’t long ago that even physicians who spoke out against mandatory masks were hunted down like a modern-day witch hunt.24

Now, it seems, YouTube has changed its tune, as it has updated its policies about what constitutes “misinformation.” Stating that “masks do not play a role in preventing the contraction or transmission of COVID-19,” or that “wearing a mask is dangerous or causes negative physical health effects,” was previously a violation of their policy,25 but this verbiage has since been removed from its examples of misinformation.

Other mask-related statements that have been removed from YouTube’s definition of misinformation include:26

  • Claims that wearing a mask causes oxygen levels to drop to dangerous levels
  • Claims that masks cause lung cancer or brain damage
  • Claims that wearing a mask gives you COVID-19

Curiously, while YouTube no longer classifies “claims that COVID-19 vaccines are not effective in preventing the spread of COVID-19 as misinformation,”27 “claims about COVID-19 vaccinations that contradict expert consensus from local health authorities or WHO” are still off limits.28

It’s also against YouTube’s guidelines to post “content alleging that vaccines cause chronic side effects” or “content claiming that vaccines do not reduce transmission or contraction of disease,”29 — the latter being a blatant contradiction to their COVID-19 vaccine terms.

So, while YouTube now allows you to say masks don’t work, you still can’t contradict WHO on vaccines. Little by little, however, the truth will emerge, as is already occurring with face masks and their carcinogenic contents.

– Sources and References

_________________

**Comment**

For anyone reading this website, you learned early on that masks don’t work and can make you sick.  They were never intended to be worn for long periods of time and while certain types of masks are useful for dust, chemicals, and other substances, they are worthless against viruses.  Worthless.

I personally know people who have been damaged by constant mask usage required by their employers.  Many had previous lung issues like asthma, and the constant re-breathing of their own breath has brought back lung issues they previously had under control.  They now need to see a pulmonologist and constantly struggle to breathe.

Lockdowns, especially for the healthy, are also completely worthless.  And while the CDC director has admitted it kinda botched COVID, she offers no meaningful change, only demands for more money from Congress, which it is getting on top of all the private money it receives.

For more:

The observational study used for masking by the CDC has been completely debunked, yet they refuse to update their guidelines with this information. The CDC has been caught lying repeatedly.  They’ve done similar things in Lymeland for over 40 years.  It is their MO.

Agency scientists are leaving in droves due to embarrassment about “bad science”, and bad health advice.  These scientists are gagged and when a reporter calls, the communications office has to approve the conversation – knowing beforehand exactly what the scientist is going to say.  Scientists have been exposing agency corruption for years.

The EPA has just launched community engagement efforts on warning of new ethylene oxide risk information.

Masks are “sterilized” with Ethylene Oxide — a known carcinogen. Many teachers in various school boards have been experiencing significant symptoms as a direct result of the effects of this chemical.

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Huge Excess Deaths – Why is No One Investigating This? Data Show Moderna Doubles Chance of Infant Death Compared to Pfizer

http://  Approx. 12 Min

Oct. 29, 2022

National Inquiry Needed to Determine Cause of Increase in Excess Deaths

Redacted with Clayton Morris

Why are there so many excess deaths in Western countries since the pandemic? Is it because overall health has declined? Is it because of “vaccine”? We break down the numbers to try to figure it out.

Mainstream media, academic and scientific, and government communities are completely ignoring this widespread phenomenon.

______________

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/moderna-doubles-the-chance-of-infant

Moderna DOUBLES the Chance of Infant Death, Compared to Pfizer

Another Slide from CDC Presentation Shows Statistically Significant Difference

Igor Chudov

Summary

CDC’s own presentation shows that being given a higher-dose Moderna vaccine during pregnancy, almost DOUBLES the chance of neonatal death, compared to women who received the lower-dose Pfizer vaccine.

How can Covid vaccine given during pregnancy be safe and NOT affect infant deaths, if infant death rate for Moderna-inoculated women is double the infant death level for Pfizer-inoculated women and the difference is statistically significant?  (See link for article)

SUMMARY:

  • It is likely the result is due to a dose-response relationship in that Moderna is a higher dose injection.
  • This is all we need to know to prove that COVID injections affect infant death.
  • The CDC presentation conveniently only compares Pfizer vaxxed women to Moderna vaxxed women.  It is highly likely that comparing these vaxxed women to unvaxxed women would show that even more infant deaths could have been prevented if pregnant women refused the jabs altogether.
  • How come the CDC and media are silent about this?

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines

Hospital Whistleblower On Significant Decrease in Birth Rates, Increase in Stillbirths & VAIDS

**UPDATE**

Go here for:  Exclusive: Leaked Hospital Memo Reveals 500 Percent Rise in Stillbirths; Fetal Specialist Explains Likely Cause

https://rumble.com/v1q85yb-huge-hospital-whistleblower-sounds-alarm-nurse-exposes-fetal-death-coverup  Video Here (Approx. 22 Min)

Hospital Whistleblower Exposes Fetal Death Coverup

A nurse whistleblower from California states that stillbirths used to be extremely uncommon, but her hospital had 22 stillbirths in one month, and are now projected to increase each month.  Go here for the Epoch Times article.  The whistleblower’s mother passed away due to the Fauci Death Protocol still being used in hospitals despite being extremely toxic and ineffective.

Forty-three year old veteran OBGYN, Dr. James A. Thorp, is seeing death and destruction like never before due to the COVID “vaccines” which cause a significant inflammatory affect.

  • 12,000 fold increase in menstrual abnormalities
  • Dr. Thorp spoke of whistleblower Dr. Kimberly Biss (OBGYN) who in this Youtube states she is seeing:
    • 50% increase in infertility
    • 50% increase in miscarriages
    • 25% increase in abnormal pap smears & cervical malignancies
  • Dr. Thorp is also seeing an increase in fetal malformation, cardiac arrest, placental thrombosis, and VAIDS (vaccine induced acquired immune deficiency).
  • Despite all these horrific outcomes it is occurring globally.

Died Suddenly will stream November 21, 2022 on The Stew Peters Network.  Sign up here for notifications:  www.stewpeters.com.

For more:

Category:

Activism, Pregnancy, vaccines

‘Gearing Up To Fight Biological Weapons?’ White House Launches $88 Billion National Biodefense Strategy. World Health Summit – More Global Censorship

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/biological-weapons-biden-biodefense-strategy/

‘Gearing up To Fight Biological Weapons?’ White House Launches $88 Billion National Biodefense Strategy

October 19, 2022
The Defender

by Michael Nevradakis, Ph.D.

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website.
Biohazard symbol

The Biden administration on Tuesday announced a new $88 billion national biodefense strategy that outlines the government’s plans for how to respond to future pandemics, public health emergencies and biological threats.

The launch of the “National Biodefense Strategy and Implementation Plan for Countering Biological Threats, Enhancing Pandemic Preparedness, and Achieving Global Health Security” included the signing of National Security Memorandum-15 (NSM-15).

Key elements of the new strategy include the rapid production and distribution of vaccines and diagnostic tests, and enhancing global health security.

The strategy also includes a new framework for the federal government’s role during a future crisis, which places the White House at the center of any such response, coordinating the actions of multiple federal agencies.

The White House said the new strategy adopts lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic.

In an interview with The Defender, University of Illinois international law professor Francis Boyle, J.D., Ph.D., a bioweapons expert who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act of 1989, said:

“It appears that the enormous amount of money here, $88 billion over five years, when you add it on to well over, I would say, maybe $130 billion [in biodefense spending] since Sept. 11, 2001, means that they are gearing up to fight biological weapons warfare around the world.”

Boyle told The Defender that between October 2001 and October 2015, the federal government spent $100 billion “on biological warfare purposes.”

“To put that into perspective,” he said, “in constant dollars, the Manhattan Project to develop the atom bomb was $40 billion.”

Plan calls for development, distribution of new vaccines within 130 days

Biden’s new biodefense strategy includes the rapid development and deployment of new vaccines and diagnostics that it foresees in response to any future “biological threats.”

According to the White House’s plan, these “biological threats” may be “naturally occurring, accidental [or] deliberate,” “with the potential to significantly impact humans, animals (domestic and wildlife), plants, and the environment, and to negatively affect health, the economy, society, and security.”

According to STAT, the plan’s targets include:

  • Being able to test for new pathogens within 12 hours.
  • Making rapid tests available to the public within 90 days.
  • Repurposing existing drugs within 90 days.
  • Developing vaccines within 100 days.
  • Manufacturing enough of the new vaccine for the entire U.S. population within 130 days and “for the high-risk global population” within 200 days.
  • Developing new treatments within 180 days.

In justifying the new strategy, an unnamed senior Biden administration official quoted by The Hill said:

“We … know that the risk of another pandemic as bad or worse than COVID is a real threat. The new National Biodefense Strategy therefore outlines a bold vision … towards a world free of pandemics and catastrophic biological incidents.”

According to Defense One, other goals contained within the plan include “detecting the spread of pathogens before patients even begin to show symptoms like fever” and “scaling up the number of diagnostic test kits by tens of thousands within a week.”

A further element of the plan is “restoring community, the economy and the environment after a pandemic or biological incident,” The Hill reported.

The Biden administration’s plan also includes provisions for preparedness against the “accidental release of biological agents, and threats posed by terrorist groups or adversaries seeking to use biological weapons.”

Noting that COVID-19 “has highlighted that the United States and the world are vulnerable to biological threats, whether naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate,” the plan states:

“It is a vital interest of the United States to prepare for, prevent, detect, respond to, and recover from biological threats at home and abroad.

“Therefore, countering biological threats, advancing pandemic preparedness, and achieving global health security are top national and international security priorities for the United States.

“Moving forward, the United States must fundamentally transform its capabilities to protect our Nation from biological threats and advance pandemic preparedness and health security more broadly for the world.”

According to STAT, an unnamed senior Biden administration official said Tuesday, “One of the important things that COVID has taught us is that we need to be able to move much faster to counter pandemic threats, and we also need to be prepared for completely unknown threats.”

The same official said the plan includes “moonshot” targets that are not scientifically feasible presently, but potentially could be within a decade.

According to the official, these new developments can target the 26 families of viruses that infect humans, “many of which we are far less prepared for than coronaviruses.”

Will Congress fund it?

Some questioned the plan’s price tag and the willingness of Congress to approve its funding.

One of the elements of the new strategy is its connection to a March 2022 request to Congress for $88 billion in funding over five years for “pandemic preparedness and biodefense,” a request that has thus far “stalled.”

These monies are intended, in part, “to fund new research to predict outbreaks before they become pandemics,” and “accelerate rapid testing to get ahead of where viruses are moving,” Defense One said.

Some of this money will come from the baseline funding of the federal agencies involved in this strategy, but it’s unclear whether Congress has “much of an appetite for additional public health spending,” according to STAT, which noted that “Republicans in Congress have balked at recent requests for funding the ongoing monkeypox and COVID-19 responses.”

According to the White House, the new strategy “builds on USAID’s [U.S. Agency for International Development] announcement earlier this year committing $150 million to the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations to accelerate the development of life-saving vaccines and countermeasures against biological threats.”

The White House also included the $1.4 billion in “seed funding” it provided earlier this year to the “groundbreaking new Financial Intermediary Fund for Pandemic Prevention, Preparedness and Response at the World Bank.”

Boyle described the $88 billion in projected funding over the next five years as “a dramatic escalation” with “no justification from legitimate scientific reasons.”

He noted that since 2015, the federal government has “allocated anywhere from $5 to $6 billion per year on biological warfare purposes, which, being conservative, would mean a sum total from Sept. 11, 2001, until now, of $135-$140 billion.”

In his view, this money is being allocated “into further expanding the U.S. biological warfare industry … for the purpose of waging biological warfare,” and instead “should have been spent on the public health of the American people.”

‘You find Tony Fauci behind all of it’

Part of the price tag for the new biodefense strategy appears to be directed toward “recruiting, training and sustaining a robust, permanent cadre of health workers in all 50 states,” in the words of a senior Biden administration official quoted by Reuters.

Referring to it as a “public health army,” STAT reported that this “cadre of health workers” will include “laboratory technicians, veterinarians, and community health workers — to not only better detect emerging diseases but respond to them.”

In turn, Defense One reported that the strategy “aims to boost the number of local healthcare workers” and “traditional frontline healthcare workers,” but also, many new positions “related to research and data collection,” including “expanding the CDC’s epidemiology field officer program” and “bringing more epidemiologists to every state.”

The Biden administration also said it is “committed to helping at least 50 countries strengthen their own local capacities,” “strengthening public health workforces both in the United States and globally” and “establishing international mechanisms to bolster laboratory safety,” according to STAT.

For some, “international mechanisms” may bring to mind the recent and ongoing efforts by the World Health Organization (WHO) to establish a renewed “global pandemic treaty” — efforts in which the United States under the Biden administration has played a leading role.

As previously reported by The Defender, the Biden administration expressed broad support for a “pandemic treaty” and previously headed negotiations on this issue.

In his interview with The Defender, Boyle also drew connections between the Biden administration’s new strategy, and efforts to develop the “pandemic treaty.”

Referring to the Biden administration’s recently signed executive order on “advancing biotechnology and biomanufacturing,” Boyle remarked that it makes mention of “dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens.”

For Boyle, “dual-use research” refers to the development of both “offensive and defensive biological weapons of warfare,” noting that “when it comes to biological warfare, defense means offense.”

“If they are saying they are doing all this for defensive purposes, it’s because they are also planning offensive use of biological warfare weapons, with the defense to defend themselves in the event that adversaries respond in kind,” Boyle added.

This then connects to the “pandemic treaty,” according to Boyle, noting that Dr. Anthony Fauci has close ties to the WHO’s executive committee:

“If you recall, Trump pulled us out of the WHO. The first act Biden did was to put us back into the WHO … and he appointed Tony Fauci as the U.S. government’s representative on the WHO executive committee.

“So the same guy supporting this ‘dual research of concern’ … is also implementing, supervising this new WHO treaty.”

Biden’s strategy also “calls for international mechanisms that can help strengthen lab safety and biosecurity practices around the world,” especially in light of “questions about the risks and benefits of research into potentially dangerous viruses,” including the COVID-19 Wuhan lab-leak theory.

This may indicate that Biden is seeking to expand gain-of-function research globally. As recently reported by The Defender, facilities conducting such research — including a facility where a purportedly “more lethal” strain of the COVID-19 Omicron variant was developed — are currently being expanded in the U.S.

Gain of function refers to the “manipulation of pathogens to make them more dangerous,” in the hope of “getting ahead of a future outbreak.”

As part of the new strategy, a “policy coordination structure for biodefense among government agencies with oversight by the White House” was signed, Reuters reported.

According to The Hill, this memorandum “outlines the coordination structure for biodefense across federal agencies, directs agencies to prioritize biodefense, directs the intelligence community to track evolving threat landscapes and ensures the government is continuously reviewing and adjusting priorities.”

Boyle, an outspoken critic of gain-of-function research, said it appears such research will be an integral part of the Biden administration’s new biodefense strategy. He told The Defender:

“It’s clear in the language that they are going full steam ahead on abusing DNA, genetic engineering, gain-of-function, synthetic biology, gene splicing, CRISPR-Cas9, to develop biological warfare weapons.”

He said that the proposed WHO pandemic treaty includes language on “measures to provide oversight and report on laboratories that do work to genetically alter organisms in order to increase pathogenicity and transmissibility.”

For Boyle, “this means gain-of-function work, using and abusing DNA engineering, synthetic biology, CRISPR-Cas9. That’s in the WHO treaty.”

“It all ties up,” Boyle added. “The executive order, the biodefense strategy, the WHO treaty. You find Tony Fauci behind all of it.”

Boyle added:

“When you add all this up together, it seems to me they’re gearing up to prepare to wage offensive biological warfare and preparing for the defense, for other states to respond with biological warfare weapons.”

Plan calls for coordination across federal agencies under White House control

The administration’s new biodefense strategy will utilize more than 20 federal agencies, while “oversight for the strategy will be at the White House, under the national security advisor.”

According to a  senior Biden administration official, the new strategy “directs the U.S. intelligence community to monitor for threats and ensure the United States ‘continuously adapts to this evolving threat landscape’ by holding annual exercises,” to “prevent epidemics and biological incidents before they happen,” Reuters reported.

This may bring to mind exercises and simulations that took place just prior to the COVID-19, monkeypox and anthrax outbreaks, which appeared to predict, with remarkable similarity, what was to follow.

According to Biden’s new strategy, the heads of the relevant federal agencies “shall implement the Biodefense Strategy, as well as related strategies such as the U.S. Global Health Security Strategy, and include biodefense-related activities … within their strategic planning and budgetary processes.”

Federal agencies also will be expected to coordinate with each other and with non-federal agencies on matters pertaining to “the biodefense enterprise.”

Is new strategy a ‘moonshot,’ or ‘pie-in-the-sky’?

In addition to questions about funding, some also questioned the feasibility of the new plan.

Defense One wrote that meeting some of the “moonshot” goals of the strategy “will require scaling up data-collection efforts at research facilities around the globe,” in addition to significantly ratcheting up a host of other research-related efforts, noting that the administration “did not specify exactly what technologies they will invest in.”

According to Defense One, “new approaches to RNA research” to “ease pandemics” may need to be developed, in addition to “new forms of plant-based vaccines” that could “allow for the scaling up of vaccine production by orders of magnitude.”

An unnamed senior Biden administration official quoted by Defense One acknowledged that the “moonshots” foreseen by the plan “are not possible today, but these capabilities can be achieved and are within our reach with the right resources over the next five to 10 years.”

Hiring more health workers may also prove challenging for the Biden administration due to a shortage of nurse practitioners that is expected to grow by 2025, along with looming “shortages of other healthcare workers.”

This article was originally published by The Defender — Children’s Health Defense’s News & Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider subscribing to The Defender or donating to Children’s Health Defense.

________________

Meanwhile, even pro-vaccine, mainstream doctors are calling for COVID advisors to be deposed:

http://

Joe Biden Needs to FIRE all his COVID advisors

By Dr. Vinay Prasad

Oct. 2022

Speaking of “globalism” this explains a lot:

http://  Approx. 10 Min

Oct. 25, 2022

2022 World Health Summit

Only One Hedges on Medical Censorship

The rest truly believe the public is stupid

Rebel News’ Drea Humphrey discusses her reporting from this year’s World Health Summit in Berlin, Germany.  A number believe the public needs to have information censored.

Only one executive spoke up for healthy skepticism and “informed consent.”

Predictably the Rebel News journalists were asked to leave.

Visit http://RebelWHO.com to support our exclusive coverage of the 2022 World Health Summit.

Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story. https://www.RebelNews.com

SUMMARY:

  • All the topics align with the overarching theme – globalism
  • A Global Health Communications panel with top representatives from FB, Google, WHO, TikTok, Science Magazine, and “Women in Global Health” discussed Big Tech censorship – which the majority agree with
    • These morons believe they need to sift through information and decide what is truth because the public is stupid
    • WHO Director of Communications calls the “purveyors of lies,” “the bad guys,” and that they have more “seductive messages” than them – the supposed purveyors of truth.  She feels they need to “flood in accurate information to drown out the “vast tsunami of these compelling lies.”
    • The TikTok creator believes that using “prebunked videos” in ad space on YouTube served to inoculate audiences against “misinformation.” She believes platforms should be using people like her to make these “prebunked” videos and should be “sacrificing ad space” so “we can help get in there.” Remember YouTube has purged thousands of channels  to silence dissent.
    • The guy from Meta admits that this type of work is “consistent with partnerships we’ve had already with a lot of health organizations” proving the evil collusion many have suspected.
    • The executive director of the WHO health emergencies program, who was a very outspoken advocate of restrictions during lockdowns was careful to state they should not weaponize communications.  He advocated for skepticism of all information.  He appeared to be the only one in the room capable of logical thought or is simply controlled opposition.

Lastly, this 2 min. video explains digital currency and how all the dots connect:  https://mobile.twitter.com/roller2426/status/1558313162671534081

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses