Author Archive

Webinar: What’s the Best Chronic Lyme Treatment For You

https://rawlsmd.com/webinars/whats-the-best-chronic-lyme-treatment-for-you/?

Dr. Bill Rawls
Co-Founder and Medical Director at Vital Plan

Jenny Buttaccio
Editorial Director at Vital Plan

What’s the Best Chronic Lyme Treatment for You?

Treating chronic Lyme disease can feel like playing a wild game of whack-a-mole: You keep attacking your symptoms as they pop up with the latest and greatest therapies, yet the fatigue, pain, brain fog, and more keep coming back.

Fortunately, there’s a more strategic and effective way to find relief from Lyme, and Dr. Bill Rawls — author of the bestselling book Unlocking Lyme — can help you find it during his new live webinar.

Join Dr. Rawls to hear his reviews of the most popular Lyme treatments available and reveal each of the treatment’s strengths and shortcomings. By the end of the webinar, you’ll understand what to try for symptom relief, what works best for addressing the underlying causes of illness, and everything in between.

PLUS: Don’t miss an exclusive gift for webinar attendees, and have your questions ready for a LIVE Q&A on Lyme disease treatments with Dr. Rawls.

RESERVE MY SEAT »

In this webinar, Dr. Rawls will also discuss:

• The 6 essential components of any successful Lyme therapy

• Why killing the microbes associated with Lyme is only part of the solution

• The 3 keys to choosing a treatment option

• Dr. Rawls’ treatment rankings by safety, effectiveness, and price

• What you should know about natural and conventional therapies for both short-term relief and long-term recovery

• Numerous insights and answers during the LIVE Q&A

Bill Rawls, M.D., is a physician and leading expert in Lyme disease, integrative health, and herbal medicine. In the middle of his successful medical career, Dr. Rawls’ life was interrupted by Lyme disease. In his journey to overcome it, he explored nearly every treatment possible – from conventional medicine to a range of alternative therapies. In the more than 12 years since his recovery, Dr. Rawls has helped thousands of patients find their path to healing from Lyme disease and chronic illness. He is the author of the bestselling books Unlocking Lyme and The Cellular Wellness Solution, and the Medical Director of RawlsMD.com and Vital Plan®, an online holistic health company and Certified B Corporation®.

OBGYN “Off the Charts” Miscarriages, Fetal Abnormalities & “Vaccinated” Suffering New Symptoms

https://rumble.com/v1mr62g–obgyn-dr-james-thorp-shares-the-off-the-charts-miscarriages-and-fetal-abno.html  Video Here (Approx. 3 Min)

OB/GYN Dr James Thorp Shares the “Off the Charts” Miscarriages & Fetal Abnormalities He Is Seeing

Oct. 5, 2022

The 3 minute video above is a small excerpt of a Ask Dr. Drew Show which is over an hour long  and found here:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2199TWEmjjU  and here:  https://drdrew.com/2022/pyramid-nanoparticles-mrna-fetal-health-research-with-dr-james-thorp-and-dr-kelly-victory-ask-dr-drew/  (This link also has all the sources used for the show)

Researchers using a scanning electron microscope claim to have spotted unusual “rectangles and inverted pyramids” in degraded Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines – adding more questions regarding lipid nanoparticles and possible autoimmune response triggers.

A new study claims that COVID-19 “vaccines” can pass mRNA through breastmilk. Though the CDC and vaccine manufacturers state that mRNA does not affect reproduction or fetal health, many OBGYNs are sounding the alarm about a patterns of miscarriages and stillbirths that they believe are signs of adverse events. Dr. James Thorp, a board certified OBGYN and Maternal Fetal Medicine Physician with over 43 years of obstetrical experience, joins Dr. Kelly Victory LIVE to discuss recent mRNA studies and especially their possible effects on pregnant women.

“I do find it very peculiar that… none of the contents appear to be of biological origin.” Dr. Thorp recently said to The Epoch Times. “There were no elements of nitrogen or phosphorus… a sine qua non (an essential condition) for a biological origin.”

_____________________

https://rumble.com/v1mrr1e-vaccinated-populations-suffering-new-illness-dr.s-report-foreign-compounds  Video Here (Approx. 8 Min)

Vaccinated populations suffering new illness, Dr.’s report foreign compounds found in vaccines

October 5, 2022

Security cameras from around the world are capturing frightening new footage of people hallucinating and then collapsing in spasms on the ground in what may be the latest symptom of exposure to the COVID-19 vaccines. One America’s Pearson Sharp has more.

For more:
But, the band plays on..…

Debunking the ‘Statement on Virus Isolation’

**UPDATE**

A wonderfully, unbiased article just came out that is definitely worth reading.  In it, the author states that spreading “misinformation” is a deliberate, willful act and that historically brilliant academics have defended their ideas, right or wrong, to the end.  This is not a malicious act.  They truly believe their views.  This is not misinformation.  The author uses the Bradford-Hill criterion to examine the “no virus theory” and ultimately concludes the theory has too many holes to be scientifically viable; however, he admits it is up to the “no virus” theorists to enlist the researchers and scientists to prove their theory.

The understanding of viral isolation is admittedly far above my pay grade.  My first introduction to the topic was through the book “Virus Mania: How the Medical  Industry Continually Invents Epidemics Making Billion-Dollar Profits At Our Expense” by Torsten Engelbrecht and Dr. Claus Kohnlein.  Then I became acquainted with and read the works of David Crowe, RIP.  The information is eye-opening to say the least and would explain many things if proven. While the jury’s still out for me, many of the things presented – particularly the corruption of Big Pharma, governments, mainstream media, and the blatant use of the faulty PCR for diagnosis (as stated by none other than the PCR inventor, Kary Mullis), are true. 

But viral isolation remains a controversial topic and one that needs to be addressed and proven.  I admire and respect the people on both sides of the argument, so it really does require public debate with unemotional scientific facts, which the following three articles present.

Lastly, as Lyme/MSIDS patients, we are well aware of scientific controversy.  Lymeland is full of it – from faulty testing created by corrupt insiders due to vaccine investments and patents, to biased research done by a conflict-riddled Cabal, to faulty treatment guidelines – also created by this Cabal based upon the biased research. COVID has shown the world the corruption in science as well as in institutions receiving government money, which was all based on faulty models, as numerous studies have had to be retracted and papers written showing the members of the COVID treatment panel receive funding and gifts from Big Pharma, which has influenced their decision making.  As it is with COVID, so it is with Lyme.  Top scientists embarrassed and alarmed by agency failure to follow science have come forward anonymously and are leaving in droves over the blatant corruption.  Their anonymity is due to fear of professional repercussions as those who speak against the accepted narrative are hunted down and persecuted similarly to Lyme literate doctors.

The witch hunts are very, very real and are not new.

It’s an ugly, never-ending circle that is completely behind patient suffering and misery, purposefully there to protect insurance companies from having to pay for a lengthy, chronic illness.  These corrupt leaders also don’t want to admit Lyme/MSIDS is persistent due to “vaccine” development which is the cash cow in the Pharmaceutical industry which pays out big dividends to investors, of which are members of Congress, other politicians, and those in academic research institutions who all stand to gain from it. 

If they lied about Lyme/MSIDS, they most probably have lied about many diseases including COVID.

All that said, the following three articles are in opposition to the tenets of the no virus theory and are important reading.

https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2022/09/05/debunking-the-statement-on-virus-isolation/

Debunking the ‘Statement on Virus Isolation’

http://

by Sep 5, 2022

The “Statement on Virus Isolation” by Kaufman, Cowan, and Morell, who claim that SARS-CoV-2 “does not exist”, is contradicted by their own cited sources.

In their “Statement on Virus Isolation“, propagators of the claim that SARS-CoV-2 “does not exist” Andrew Kaufman, Tom Cowan, and Sally Fallon Morell cite three sources to support their argument. In this video (also on Rumble), I demonstrate their lack of credibility by showing how their claims are contradicted by their own cited sources.

Here are their three cited sources:

I also mention these source from the literature:

And here are some related articles and videos:

_________________

https://www.jeremyrhammond.com/2022/10/17/answering-tom-cowans-five-simple-questions-for-virologists/

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/yet-another-final-respectful-response?

Yet Another Final, Respectful Response to Virus Denialism.

Tom addressed some, well one of my points that show that their paradigm is falsified by data. Here is my response to his failed rebuttal video.

Virus denialists have a large following. Tom Cowan, in particular, believes that we need to be able to use our own senses to know something exists. This is a simplifying but empirically impoverished viewpoint on what we can know via Science.

Tom took to Bitchute in a video to respond to eight points that I posted on the matter.

He did not address eight points. Here, without adding to disunity, I rebut (again, and likely for the last time), the claims by providing scientific evidence.

An Aside

As an aside, understand that I am reluctantly taking my time to write this article, because I know that those promulgating virus denialism will not pay heed to any scientific evidence I provide that demonstrates the falseness of their claims.

When I have debated virus deniers in the past and provided references to studies that directly rebut their false claims, they have ignored the scientific evidence I provided and continued to make the same statements – the very next day. I know this because after I debated a virus denier in a recorded debate, I happened to also be in a zoom meeting the next day with one of the participants in the event. They acted as if the studies I sent to them did not exist and simply repeated the same faulty claims that were made by my opponent the day before.

In his Bitchute, it is interesting that Tom skipped over my Point #1: that Koch himself failed, using his own criteria, to identify now-known pathogens. This is a rather important point, and Tom’s failure to address it speaks volumes.

In my response, I will simply provide studies that show that the specific claims about SARS-CoV-2 virus by virus deniers like Cowan are factually incorrect. The studies I show are representative of a much, much larger body of published science that shows the basic claims being made are false.

I will not speculate on the motivation of those who would care to continue to ignore studies. They themselves can address that obvious question.

Koch’s Postulates

Koch developed rules to follow by which one can determine if a pathogen is responsible for a disease. The reader should be aware these were published in 1884; Koch updated them to relax the first postulate when he discovered asymptomatic transmission. Also, Koch’s postulates fail to apply to typhoid fever, diphtheria, leprosy, relapsing fever, and Asiatic cholera specifically because it is difficult to create ‘the disease anew’ in animals upon infection (Ref).

Koch’s postulates were addressed head-on for the SARS virus in 2003. See

Koch’s postulates fulfilled for SARS virus.

As originally written, Koch’s four criteria were:

(1) The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy individuals;

We know that asymptomatic COVID-19 infection can occur. Koch himself had to modify his postulates after he discovered asymptomatic infections could occur.

(2) The microorganism must be cultured from the diseased individual;

SARS-CoV-2 has, in fact, been cultured. It’s a matter of routine:

Wurtz N, Penant G, Jardot P, Duclos N, La Scola B. Culture of SARS-CoV-2 in a panel of laboratory cell lines, permissivity, and differences in growth profile. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Mar;40(3):477-484. doi: 10.1007/s10096-020-04106-0.

“In the present work, we tested 4 strains of SARS-CoV-2 locally isolated on a panel of 34 cell lines present in our laboratory and commonly used for the isolation of human pathogenic microorganism. After inoculation, cells were observed for cytopathic effects and quantitative real-time polymerase reaction was used to measure the virus replication on the cells. We were able to obtain growth on 7 cell lines, 6 simian, and the human Caco-2. The cytopathogenic effects are variable, ranging from lysis of the cell monolayer in 48–72 h to no cytopathic effect in spite of intense multiplication, as in Caco-2 cells. Interestingly, effect and multiplication varied widely according to the strain tested.”

Sung A, Bailey AL, Stewart HB, McDonald D, Wallace MA, Peacock K, Miller C, Reske KA, O’Neil CA, Fraser VJ, Diamond MS, Burnham CD, Babcock HM, Kwon JH. Isolation of SARS-CoV-2 in Viral Cell Culture in Immunocompromised Patients With Persistently Positive RT-PCR Results. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Feb 2;12:804175. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.804175.

“Viral RNA and cultivable virus were recovered from the cultured cells after qRT-PCR and plaque assays. Of 20 patients, 10 (50%) had a solid organ transplant and 5 (25%) had a hematologic malignancy. For most patients, RT-PCR Ct values increased over time. There were 2 patients with positive viral cell cultures; one patient had chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with venetoclax and obinutuzumab who had a low viral titer of 27 PFU/mL.”

Even the important study showing that use of too high RT-PCR cycle thresholds led to false positives used the ability to create a culture and infectiousness from clinical samples

Singanayagam A, Patel M, Charlett A, Lopez Bernal J, Saliba V, Ellis J, Ladhani S, Zambon M, Gopal R. Duration of infectiousness and correlation with RT-PCR cycle threshold values in cases of COVID-19, England, January to May 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(32):2001483. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.32.2001483.

(See link for article)

I highly recommend reading the entire article which is extensively footnoted.

________________

For more:

Lyme-Related Book a Finalist for National Book Award

https://www.lymedisease.org/invisible-kingdom-orourke/

Lyme-related book a finalist for National Book Award

“The Invisible Kingdom: Reimagining Chronic Illness, by Meghan O’Rourke, has been named a finalist for the National Book Award for non-fiction.

It draws from her experience living with Lyme and other chronic illnesses and from interviews with doctors, public health experts and patients.

She explores such invisible illnesses as autoimmune disease, persistent Lyme disease, and long COVID.

O’Rourke traces the history of Western definitions of illness, and reveals how inherited ideas of cause, diagnosis, and treatment have led us to ignore a host of hard-to-understand medical conditions, ones that resist easy description or simple cures.

The National Book Foundation will announce winners on November 16.

Seeking to Unlock the Mysteries of Lyme Arthritis

https://www.lymedisease.org/unlock-mysteries-lyme-athritis/

Seeking to unlock the mysteries of Lyme arthritis

By Richard Harth
Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University

A nature lover from early childhood, Karie Behm found peace and renewal through hiking and cross-country running. She spent much of her time exploring the forested terrain of her native Kansas, as well as Minnesota and Colorado, during family vacations.

She did not suspect that on one unremarkable day, microscopic, corkscrew-like pathogens known as spirochetes would stealthily invade her body, causing a succession of painful, debilitating and perplexing disease symptoms. It would take physicians over six years to untangle the mystery.

Behm had contracted Lyme disease, following a tick bite.

A recent doctoral graduate from the School of Molecular Sciences and the Biodesign Institute at Arizona State University, Behm has devoted her energies to unlocking some of the secrets of Lyme disease, a tenacious ailment affecting some 500,000 Americans every year.

“People have finally come to the realization that Lyme disease has been around a long time and has been affecting a lot of people who have been chronically ill and couldn’t get help,” Behm says. “Patient advocacy groups have been working tirelessly for the last 20 years to try to bring attention to this problem. It’s not a little thing and it’s not a joke. It can affect you your entire life.”

Studying the disease that debilitated her

Behm came to ASU in 2016, with a personal goal in mind — to study the disease causing her often incapacitating symptoms. A highly motivated scholar and researcher, she managed to convince her advisor, Debra Hansen, of the importance of studying this underreported and misunderstood ailment.

Behm and Hansen, both researchers with the Biodesign Center for Applied Structural Discovery (CASD), then consulted Petra Fromme, director of the center and an authority on the structural characterization of proteins, including those associated with infectious disease.

The team hatched a plan to study Lyme arthritis, a pervasive symptom found in many Lyme disease cases. “Petra loves students who share her passion,” Behm says.

“During my first interview with her, she got really excited about how the lab’s structural techniques could be applied to Lyme disease.” Prior to her arrival at the lab, Behm, working independently, had already completed an NSF proposal to study Lyme disease.

The project gathered momentum when Behm conducted a literature search, identifying a suite of proteins believed to decorate the surface of Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterial parasite transmitted by a tick bite that causes Lyme disease.

Drawing on a recent award from ASU Women and Philanthropy, the team is advancing its efforts by using a powerful method known as cryo-EM to observe membrane proteins found on the surface of the Borrelia parasite in stunning detail.

A remarkable discovery

Eureka moment: Behm’s negative stain electron microscopy image, offering the first visual evidence of a membrane pore identified by the researchers. This pore may provide an attractive therapeutic target for future drug design against Lyme arthritis. Photo courtesy Biodesign Institute.

The research has already led to a remarkable discovery. One such membrane protein, known as BBA57, binds to copies of itself to form a complex at the membrane surface. The result appears to be a portal to and from the cell’s interior — a pore.

The discovery arrived late one night in the lab, in the form of fresh electron microscope images. It was the culmination of years of dogged research and opens the door to effective therapies against Lyme disease, and potentially other serious afflictions as well.

Of the 100 or so membrane proteins recognized in B. burgdorferi, BBA57 is special. Its presence is linked to Lyme arthritis, a painful, untreatable and often lifelong affliction occurring in 20% of Lyme disease patients.

The discovery of the membrane hole may be a turning point, as it provides an ideal site to attack Lyme arthritis by designing a drug that can plug up the pore.

“This project aims to discover the first structure of the major protein responsible for Lyme arthritis, BB57, which forms a pore-like structure in the membrane,” Fromme says. “When we unravel the structural basis for Lyme arthritis, new drugs can be developed to fight the condition and prevent the lifelong suffering of hundreds of thousands of patients.”

Climate change and Lyme disease

The bacteria responsible for Lyme disease are carried in the saliva of several tick varieties. In the Northeast and upper Midwestern U.S., the disease is transmitted by the blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis), and by the western blacklegged tick (Ixodes pacificus) along the Pacific Coast.

Lyme-carrying ticks operate by stealth. They are not able to fly or jump, instead finding their targets through a process known as questing. Resting atop grasses or shrubs, the ticks hold fast to leaves or grass using their lower legs. The upper pair of legs is kept outstretched, awaiting an unsuspecting passerby. When a suitable host brushes past the place where the tick lies in wait, it quickly climbs onto the host and locates a place to bite and feed on blood.

Ticks may attach themselves to any part of the human body but are often found in well-concealed regions, including the groin area, armpits and scalp. Once a tick has attached and begun feeding, it usually takes 36–48 hours for the Lyme bacteria to be transmitted.

While Borrelia bacteria can cause severe illness in their human hosts, in a diabolical twist, they may improve the tick’s fitness by modifying its central nervous system, extending the length of time the tick spends questing and making it more resistant to extremes of temperature and dryness. To make matters worse, many Lyme disease patients become co-infected with other pathogenic microbes lurking in ticks.

Another area of concern is the fact that reported cases of the disease have roughly doubled since 1991. This is likely due to a combination of factors, including more awareness of the disease and better diagnostic approaches. But there is also mounting evidence that the geographic range over which Lyme-carrying ticks wander may be expanding due to climate change.

Disease of a thousand faces

Many factors may affect the timing and nature of symptoms of Lyme disease, which typically begin three to 30 days following infection. Such symptoms may include fever, chills, headache, fatigue, muscle and joint aches, and swollen lymph nodes, with or without an accompanying rash.

One reason Lyme disease is so vexing to properly diagnose is that it can manifest in many ways in different patients. While 70% of Lyme cases develop the signature circular rash according to reporting, even this figure remains a topic of fierce controversy, and the CDC believes there may be a significant overreporting of rashes. This is because without the rash, Lyme cases are less likely to be diagnosed and treated in a timely manner by physicians.

Should the telltale rash known as erythema migrans occur, it will appear at the site of the tick bite, expanding gradually over several days. The rash may feel warm to the touch but is usually not painful or itchy. The rash sometimes clears as it enlarges, producing a characteristic bullseye appearance, but can assume different shapes, if it is present at all.

An array of further symptoms can develop days or months after infection, including facial palsy; neck stiffness; severe headache; intermittent pain in tendons, muscles, joints and bones; heart palpitations or an irregular heartbeat (known as Lyme carditis); nerve pain and inflammation of the brain and spinal cord; episodes of dizziness; and shortness of breath.

Behm recalls the perplexing constellation of symptoms at the start of her illness: “As a younger teenager, I had random medical issues that came up that just didn’t seem to make sense,” she says.

“There were visits to a lot of medical facilities. They knew something was wrong but couldn’t figure out what it was. I got passed around to specialists until I was officially diagnosed my senior year of high school.”

Lyme arthritis can cause severe pain and permanent joint damage

Approximately one in four Lyme disease patients may develop Lyme arthritis, involving chronic joint pain and swelling, particularly the knees and other large joints. The disorder occurs when the Lyme disease bacteria migrate to joint tissues, causing inflammation.

If left untreated, Lyme arthritis causes permanent damage to joints. While knees are the most commonly affected area, other large joints may be involved, including the shoulder, ankle, elbow, jaw, wrist or hip.

Following diagnosis, Lyme disease is treated with a course of antibiotics, which can work to eliminate the spirochete bacteria and gradually relieve symptoms. Yet, there is an important caveat: time is of the essence.

“The existing treatments generally don’t work if you’ve been infected more than two to six months prior,” Hansen says.

By this time, “the bacteria have disseminated in your body, and go into a persistent, antibiotic-resistant form. So if you’re diagnosed six years later, like Karie, and you’re treated for the disease, that treatment probably doesn’t work because the bacteria are resistant,” she says.

The result can be a collection of symptoms referred to [by some] as Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome. The causes are varied and remain poorly understood. It may be that the bacterium has changed form and sequestered itself in ways that evade detection. In other cases, autoimmune responses may be involved. To date, no treatment exists for these common complications.

Roughly 70,000 people in the U.S. each year experience lifelong, untreatable Lyme disease. Among these are some 42,000 who develop Lyme arthritis. Currently, physicians have had little to offer such patients, but that may be about to change.

Protein components of Lyme unmasked

Using electron microscopy, Behm, Hansen and Fromme were able to zero in on a protein that had been identified in previous research as an essential element in the process leading to Lyme arthritis. This work had been carried out by Dr. Uptal Pal, a Lyme disease authority from the University of Maryland, who is now collaborating with the ASU group.

The Lyme disease protein complex at the membrane surface of B. burgdorferi is comparatively large, tricky to crystallize and not easily amenable to X-ray crystallography, the conventional gold standard for protein structural analysis. Instead, a relatively new and powerful method known as cryo-EM, ideal for large proteins, was used.

Cryo-EM, a groundbreaking method for investigating 3D protein shapes, has racked up a long list of impressive achievements since 2017, when its discoverers were awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. Nevertheless, the new study marks the first time it has been applied to the study of Lyme disease.

The technique involves flash-freezing solutions of proteins or other biomolecules in vitreous ice, then bombarding them with electrons to produce images of individual molecules suitable for electron microscopy. The images are used to reconstruct the 3D structure of the molecule, an essential step in understanding how proteins work, how their dysfunction (or use by pathogens) can trigger disease and how drugs may be custom engineered to target them.

Molecular mugshot spurs eureka moment

Peering at the specimens through electron eyes, the researchers began to produce a molecular portrait of the suspect believed to be responsible for Lyme arthritis, through the acquisition of thousands of cryo-EM snapshots.

Research by Pal had already shown that strains of Borrelia engineered to lack BBA57 did not produce Lyme arthritis, though the reasons for this remained obscure. It was only through the work of Behm and her team that a plausible mechanism gradually came into focus.

In addition to complex sample preparation, thousands of images had to be carefully assembled. Often, it seemed the researchers were feeling their way through the dark. But late one evening in the lab, a new set of negative stain electron microscopy images were developed, and the results were riveting. At long last, the team had pictures with just enough resolution to make out what unmistakably appeared as a small hole in the membrane, composed of protein subunits.

It was the break they had been waiting for, after three years of work.

The team had theorized that perhaps Borrelia causes Lyme arthritis by transporting some disease factor from within the cell, out into the extracellular environment. And here, before their eyes, was the transport tunnel likely used as a passageway from inside the cell to outside, into the host’s bloodstream.

“Debbie, Petra and I were all there, having a late-night meeting when we saw the images. And everyone shouted, ‘Yay!’” Behm recalls.

The elusive pores they had long suspected had materialized with unmistakable clarity.

The race for a cure

The most gratifying news for the group was not simply that their hard work was rewarded with an important insight into the structure of BBA57, but that the finding suggests a promising approach for preventing Lyme arthritis.

The basic idea is simple: Design a drug that plugs up the hole on the Borrelia membrane surface. But to accomplish this, the protein structure of BBA57 will require much more refinement.

The team has calculated that the images of a million pores will be needed to visualize the protein with sufficient resolution to permit drug design. The researchers are using the new award from ASU Woman and Philanthropy to achieve this feat, collecting the mass of images that will permit structural determination down to the locations of atoms.

Achieving atomic resolution will allow the researchers to see where each of the roughly 800,000 atoms making up each pore-forming molecule are situated.

“We’ll know the position of each of those atoms, and that kind of intimate detail is enough to be able to computationally look for drug binders, with existing drug libraries,” Hansen says.

Teaming up with Pal, the researchers are pursuing long-term funding through a $3 million grant proposal to NIH, due to begin as early as 2023. The funding will be contingent on the early results the group is producing now, so the pace of study is hectic.

Once the final structural determination of a given protein has been made, drug companies can take the 3D data and use high-performance computers to begin designing drugs to act on it.

The long and winding road ahead

BBA57 is just one protein active in Lyme disease. Many others exist, and once they have been characterized, may also be targeted by smart drugs. The possibility of preventing Lyme disease altogether may be on the horizon, and the general approach pursued by Behm and her colleagues may be applicable to other tick-borne diseases or, possibly, other spirochete afflictions, such as syphilis, yaws and relapsing fever.

Having suffered through the ups and downs of this enigmatic illness, Behm is doubly committed to finding answers. She describes the early days of her pitched battle with the disease as a mixture of fear and determination.

Behm continues her explorations of Lyme disease at her new position as ORISE Fellow at the CDC in Atlanta.

__________________

**Comment**

I have numerous issues with this article:

  1. Lyme arthritis IS treatable.  Please see the comment section after the article:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2022/05/04/why-do-some-people-develop-severe-lyme-arthritis-others-dont/  I must also add that chelation (pulling heavy metals out of the body) is another strategy I am currently using. I have also found the following form of curcumin completely eradicated my pain. Dealing with inflammation is a must.
  2. Minimum transmission times have never been studied and to continue to regurgitate the mantra that it “usually takes 36-48” hours for it to happen is causing untold suffering.
  3. There is often more than Lyme at play and transmission time can be within minutes.
  4. “Climate change” has NOTHING to do with tick and disease proliferation but continues to be chanted like a mantra from research institutions who depend upon government grants.  It is part of a much larger scheme for power and money.
  5. Pigeon-holing symptoms happening three-30 days after infection is mythology also dooming thousands.  Nothing is said about psychological issues often experienced.
  6. It is a complete LIE that 70% develop the EM rash. It is highly variable & often not there.
  7. We need to drop the PTLDS label like a bad habit.  It does not explain a huge subset of patients but is still being used to put patients into a four-cornered box.
  8. To throw out that 70,000 in the US experience untreatable Lyme is complete guesswork.  According to this, the actual number is much, much higher.  No research is done on this group.  They simply don’t exist because mainstream medicine/research, led by the nose by the CDC/NIH/IDSA, don’t believe chronic/persistent Lyme exists.  Nobody even talks about the coinfections and the ramifications of having both.
  9. While researchers are riveted on finding/creating an expensive pharmaceutical “smart” drug (with patents to go all around making everyone wealthy) to plug up the elusive “pore” or conduit through which supposedly arthritis is created from, they ignore cheaper, safer, options such as nutraceuticals which desperate Lyme patients have had to discover, often on their own, to be effective.  Unfortunately, this myopic patent-oriented thinking is the “new norm” in research – even led by a patient who should know better due to the prolific and blatant corruption in all things in Lymeland.