Archive for the ‘vaccines’ Category

Fauci Told Our Government to Tell People “Don’t Do Autopsies On COVID Patients”

https://rumble.com/vxwz04-dr.-ryan-cole-on-dead-covid-patients-we-were-told-by-fauci-do-not-do-autopsy Video Here (Approx. 9 Min)

Fauci: “Don’t Do Autopsies”

March 20, 2022

“You can not find that for which you do not look.” ~ Dr. Ryan Cole

Dr. Cole said autopsies are finally starting to be done and that he has personally seen a nine-year-old as well as a healthy 22 year old wrestler both die after the COVID shots.

Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Robert Malone are tired of seeing young children die or suffer permanent damage from a “vaccine” that “does not work for a virus that is no longer here and most of them have already recovered.” Yet, the courageous medical experts, who have been smeared and maligned by big pharma, left-wing politicians, and media, continue to risk their careers to save children.

Malone, creator of the mRNA technology, warns parents of three issues:

  1. A viral gene will be injected into your children’s cells which forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins which can cause permanent, irreparable damage to critical organs including the brain and nervous system, heart and blood vessels including blood clots, the reproductive system, and the immune system.
  2. This novel mRNA technology has not been adequately tested, and a minimum of five years of testing and research should be done before risks can be understood.
  3. Reasons being given to “vaccinate” children are based upon lies.  Children represent no danger to parents or grandparents and it’s actually the opposite.  Their immunity after recovery is critical to save your family, if not the world from this disease.  They generate broad, long-lasting natural immunity which is the best answer.  There are 150 studies published on natural immunity, evidence for early outpatient treatment for COVID, more than 150 comparative studies & articles on mask ineffectiveness and harms, more than 400 studies on the failure of lockdowns and restrictions, 44 studies on “vaccine” efficacy that raise doubts on “vaccine” mandates, as well as 20 steps to end the madness by their colleague, Dr. Paul Alexander at Brownstone Institute.

https://rairfoundation.com/doctors-sound-alarm-covid-vaccines-are-killing-children-and-causing-permanent-damage-video/  Video Here

Doctors Sound Alarm: Covid ‘Vaccines’ Are Killing Children and Causing Permanent Damage (Video)

 Amy Mek
March 20, 2022

“As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.” – Dr. Robert Malone

Dr. Robert Malone, an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the inventor of the core mRNA vaccine technology platform, and Dr. Ryan Cole, a Mayo Clinic trained Pathologist who is the CEO and Medical Director of Cole Diagnostics, are fighting to save children from the detrimental effects of the Covid vaccines.

The two medical experts were featured at four sold-out One Washington events. The event organizer is a non-profit organization that is helping equip parents, lawmakers, and activists to counter moves by the state Board of Health to add the Covid “vaccine” to the required shots for public school children.

Cancer Spreads Like Wildfire

RAIR Foundation USA had previously reported on Dr. Cole, who warned that the Covid “vaccines” are also linked to increased cancer cases.

After he spoke out about the risks of the shots, ‘numerous’ oncologists contacted him. The doctors reported they are “seeing the weirdest cancers, and cancers that we have been able to keep in check and treat, taking off like wildfire – going stage 2, stage 3, stage 4, just like that.”

https://rumble.com/vv5z8m-dr.-roger-hodkinson-discusses-heart-damage-from-mrna-injection  Video Here (Approx. 6 Min)

Pathologist Dr. Roger Hodkinson

Heart Damage & Blood Clotting After mRNA Injection

Article here:  https://rairfoundation.com/alert-dr-roger-hodkinson-on-heart-damage-blood-clotting-from-mrna-injection-exclusive/

These conditions are being “sloughed off” by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) as “too low a frequency to be concerned about, etc.,” Dr. Roger Hodkinson observed. While the CDC and their political allies dismiss heart damage from the mRNA “vaccine,” the problem is very real and has short term, as well as long term implications.

“They’re not mild,” the pathologist emphasized, “and the frequency is substantially higher than what they’re claiming as all kinds of data is coming out.”

Just this week, RAIR Foundation USA reported on two young boys found dead with myocarditis within a week of taking the shot.

“Jessica Rose in Israel, for example, is one of the prime statisticians that’s drawing attention to [the weak reporting systems],” Dr. Hodkinson said. “This is a very serious problem,” he continued. Dr. Hodkinson mentioned the soccer players and pilots who are dying from heart damage after taking the mRNA injections.

And this article by Dr. Clare Craig, a diagnostic pathologist and Co-Chair of HART shows that heart deaths in children and young people increase after each COVID shot dose, according to UK ONS data, despite their conclusion that there isn’t an association between the shots and increased death.

  • The ONS agreed in court that there was a statistically significant increase in registered deaths of 15-19 year old males since May 2021, yet it provided no breakdown by age or sex in this study. Why not?
  • What is the reason for the 12 week arbitrary cut-off?
  • Despite the authors declaring no conflicts of interests, one of the authors, Kamlesh Khunti, a member of SAGE, has previously declared that he “acted as a consultant, speaker or received grants for investigator-initiated studies for AstraZeneca, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis, Lilly and Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Berlin-Chemie AG/Menarini Group, Janssen and Napp”. Another author, Amitava Banerjee, has written about the importance of declaring conflicts of interest but failed to declare, on this paper, that his research is funded by AstraZeneca. Did these conflict create a bias in how this data was presented?
  • Vaccine induced spike protein appears to have a strong relationship with cardiac death which worsens with each dose:
    • 16% of deaths being cardiac within 12 weeks of a first dose
    • 19% within 12 weeks of a second dose
    • 27% within 12 weeks of a third dose
There is a marked signal here of an increase in cardiac deaths due to vaccination that must not be ignored.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Broken Science Tonight 7:30pm ET & The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine

https://www.theepochtimes.com/dr-martin-kulldorff-how-to-dismantle-the-cartel-of-public-health-funding-and-rekindle-open-scientific-inquiry  Go here for episode

Dr. Martin Kulldorff: How to Dismantle the ‘Cartel’ of Public Health Funding and Rekindle Open Scientific Inquiry

JAN JEKIELEK

This episode will premiere on Thurs. March 31, at 7:30 p.m. ET.     

“New ideas always come from the fringe in science. So we have to encourage new ideas to come up. We can’t have science become a religion where there are dogmas.”

In this episode, filmed at Hillsdale College’s Censorship of Science conference, we sit down with Dr. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist, biostatistician, and former professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School. He’s a co-author of the Great Barrington Declaration that argued for “focused protection” of the vulnerable instead of lockdowns.

Kulldorff breaks down what he sees as the “power hubs” controlling policy, research funding, and career advancement in the scientific world.

“Dr. Fauci sort of sits on the biggest chunk of infectious disease research money in the world. So it takes a bit of guts to contradict his view on pandemic strategy.”

Kulldorff is the scientific director at the Brownstone Institute and a founding fellow at Hillsdale College’s Academy for Science and Freedom.

“I’m very concerned that 400 years of enlightenment or scientific progress may come to an end. And I think we have to work very hard to avoid that.”

For more: 

http://

The Illusion of Evidence Based Medicine

Dr. John Campbell

March 26, 2022

Dr. Campbell goes through a paper that is in the British Medical Journal (BMJ) on how evidence based medicine has been corrupted by corporate interests, failed regulation, and commercialization of academia.

The Research Leader, child psychiatrist Adelaide Leemon B. McHenry, is professor emeritus Emeritus Professor at Cal State University. The research is not commissioned, but is externally peer reviewed & was published on March 16, 2022:  https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o702

Evidence based medicine has been corrupted by corporate interests, failed regulation, and commercialisation of academia, argue these authors

The advent of evidence based medicine was a paradigm shift intended to provide a solid scientific foundation for medicine. The validity of this new paradigm, however, depends on reliable data from clinical trials, most of which are conducted by the pharmaceutical industry and reported in the names of senior academics. The release into the public domain of previously confidential pharmaceutical industry documents has given the medical community valuable insight into the degree to which industry sponsored clinical trials are misrepresented.1234 Until this problem is corrected, evidence based medicine will remain an illusion.

The philosophy of critical rationalism, advanced by the philosopher Karl Popper, famously advocated for the integrity of science and its role in an open, democratic society. A science of real integrity would be one in which practitioners are careful not to cling to cherished hypotheses and take seriously the outcome of the most stringent experiments.5 This ideal is, however, threatened by corporations, in which financial interests trump the common good. Medicine is largely dominated by a small number of very large pharmaceutical companies that compete for market share, but are effectively united in their efforts to expanding that market. The short term stimulus to biomedical research because of privatisation has been celebrated by free market champions, but the unintended, long term consequences for medicine have been severe. Scientific progress is thwarted by the ownership of data and knowledge because industry suppresses negative trial results, fails to report adverse events, and does not share raw data with the academic research community. Patients die because of the adverse impact of commercial interests on the research agenda, universities, and regulators.

The pharmaceutical industry’s responsibility to its shareholders means that priority must be given to their hierarchical power structures, product loyalty, and public relations propaganda over scientific integrity. Although universities have always been elite institutions prone to influence through endowments, they have long laid claim to being guardians of truth and the moral conscience of society. But in the face of inadequate government funding, they have adopted a neo-liberal market approach, actively seeking pharmaceutical funding on commercial terms. As a result, university departments become instruments of industry: through company control of the research agenda and ghostwriting of medical journal articles and continuing medical education, academics become agents for the promotion of commercial products.6 When scandals involving industry-academe partnership are exposed in the mainstream media, trust in academic institutions is weakened and the vision of an open society is betrayed.

The corporate university also compromises the concept of academic leadership. Deans who reached their leadership positions by virtue of distinguished contributions to their disciplines have in places been replaced with fundraisers and academic managers, who are forced to demonstrate their profitability or show how they can attract corporate sponsors. In medicine, those who succeed in academia are likely to be key opinion leaders (KOLs in marketing parlance), whose careers can be advanced through the opportunities provided by industry. Potential KOLs are selected based on a complex array of profiling activities carried out by companies, for example, physicians are selected based on their influence on prescribing habits of other physicians.7 KOLs are sought out by industry for this influence and for the prestige that their university affiliation brings to the branding of the company’s products. As well paid members of pharmaceutical advisory boards and speakers’ bureaus, KOLs present results of industry trials at medical conferences and in continuing medical education. Instead of acting as independent, disinterested scientists and critically evaluating a drug’s performance, they become what marketing executives refer to as “product champions.”

Ironically, industry sponsored KOLs appear to enjoy many of the advantages of academic freedom, supported as they are by their universities, the industry, and journal editors for expressing their views, even when those views are incongruent with the real evidence. While universities fail to correct misrepresentations of the science from such collaborations, critics of industry face rejections from journals, legal threats, and the potential destruction of their careers.8 This uneven playing field is exactly what concerned Popper when he wrote about suppression and control of the means of science communication.9 The preservation of institutions designed to further scientific objectivity and impartiality (i.e., public laboratories, independent scientific periodicals and congresses) is entirely at the mercy of political and commercial power; vested interest will always override the rationality of evidence.10

Regulators receive funding from industry and use industry funded and performed trials to approve drugs, without in most cases seeing the raw data. What confidence do we have in a system in which drug companies are permitted to “mark their own homework” rather than having their products tested by independent experts as part of a public regulatory system? Unconcerned governments and captured regulators are unlikely to initiate necessary change to remove research from industry altogether and clean up publishing models that depend on reprint revenue, advertising, and sponsorship revenue.

Our proposals for reforms include: liberation of regulators from drug company funding; taxation imposed on pharmaceutical companies to allow public funding of independent trials; and, perhaps most importantly, anonymised individual patient level trial data posted, along with study protocols, on suitably accessible websites so that third parties, self-nominated or commissioned by health technology agencies, could rigorously evaluate the methodology and trial results. With the necessary changes to trial consent forms, participants could require trialists to make the data freely available. The open and transparent publication of data are in keeping with our moral obligation to trial participants—real people who have been involved in risky treatment and have a right to expect that the results of their participation will be used in keeping with principles of scientific rigor. Industry concerns about privacy and intellectual property rights should not hold sway.

Footnotes

  • Competing interests: McHenry and Jureidini are joint authors of The Illusion of Evidence-Based Medicine: Exposing the Crisis of Credibility in Clinical Research (Adelaide: Wakefield Press, 2020). Both authors have been remunerated by Los Angeles law firm, Baum, Hedlund, Aristei and Goldman for a fraction of the work they have done in analysing and critiquing GlaxoSmithKline’s paroxetine Study 329 and Forest Laboratories citalopram Study CIT-MD-18. They have no other competing interests to declare.

  • Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed

References

  1. ↵
  2. ↵
  3. ↵
  4. ↵
  5. ↵
  6. ↵
  7. ↵
  8. ↵
  9. ↵
  10. ↵

View Abstract

_________________

**Comment**

Please also read “How Politics Corrupted Evidence-Based Medicine – and How to Fix it” by Dr. Robert Malone.

For more:

In short, science and public health is completely broken, and a powerful unelected ‘Cabal’ controls both scientific funding and health policy in America

Category:

Activism, research, Treatment, vaccines, Viruses

FDA Authorizes 2nd Booster for Ages 50 & Up Without Consulting Its Vax Panel & The Fact There’s a 22,000% Increase in Deaths After Shots

https://thenewamerican.com/fda-authorized-second-booster-for-americans-50-without-consulting-with-its-vax-panel

FDA Authorized Second Booster for Americans 50+ Without Consulting With Its Vax Panel

by Veronika Kyrylenko
FDA Authorized Second Booster for Americans 50+ Without Consulting With Its Vax Panel
Plyushkin/iStock/Getty Images Plus

On Tuesday, the FDA authorized Americans who are 50 years of age and older to receive a second booster of the Covid shot from either Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna. The move comes after the Biden administration, disregarding the most basic “scientific” decorum and procedures, was reported to offer older Americans a fourth dose of the Covid vaccine. By fall, younger Americans will likely be able to get their second booster, too.

The news of the administration’s planning to make yet another dose available to the public was first reported by The New York Times over the weekend.  (See link for article)

Important excerpt:

There’s a troubling caveat in that decision: it seems to have been made by the administration without discussion with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “independent” panels. Meaning, the Biden administration is releasing the fourth vaccine booster without any public deliberation on the matter.

____________________

SUMMARY:

  • Federal public health agencies have been operating under regulatory capture
  • There is no “science” behind the move
  • Vinay Prasad of the Brownstown Institute argues that the advisory committees’ meetings are skipped “because many smart people will disagree with them, and consider their plan reckless and lacking data.
  • August 2021 – two senior FDA regulators resigned from their positions over disagreement with the White House’s pressure to move forward with COVID booster shots without FDA approval, as well as with the CDC’s involvement in the approval process.
  • VRBPAC decided that it was too early to throw its support behind a blanket authorization for booster doses of Pfizer’s COVID shot for people 16 and older and voted against recommending it to the general public.
  • Prasad states that due to it being an election year, Biden’s desire to “keep COVID numbers low” reaffirms the assumption that public health is acting as a political organization not a health organization.
  • COVID shot efficacy is dire: breakthrough infections even about the triple vaxxed has prompted the Pfizer CEO to announce that the immune protection offered by the third dose “is not very good against infections” and “doesn’t last very long,” yet maintains the necessity of taking yet another dose.

_________________

https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/22000-increase-in-deaths-following-covid-vaccines-for-adults-over-50-as-fda-authorizes-2nd-booster-for-this-age-group/

22,000% Increase in Deaths following COVID “Vaccines” for Adults Over 50 as FDA Authorizes 2nd Booster for this Age Group

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

March 29, 2022

A sampling of the stories we have covered over the past 15 months on thousands of older adults dying after the COVID Vaccines.

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The FDA announced today that it has issued another emergency use authorization (EUA) for a second COVID booster vaccine for adults over the age of 50, and as young as 12 years old if they are “immune compromised.”

Pfizer had made the request for a second booster shot two weeks ago, but their request was for adults over the age of 65. The FDA, however, lowered that to age 50, and issued the EUA for both the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Fierce Pharma reports:

Amid the ongoing debate over the need for another round of COVID-19 boosters, the FDA has acted quickly on the matter.

Only two weeks after Pfizer and its partner BioNTech asked the agency for an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a second round of COVID-19 boosters in people 65 and older, the FDA has granted the nod. The new FDA authorization covers those who have already been boosted with any COVID vaccine and are either 50 and older or 12 and older if they are immunocompromised.

At around the same time on Tuesday morning, Moderna said the FDA had granted its application for a second booster. The Moderna nod covers adults over 50 who have been boosted once, plus immunocompromised adults over 18. Moderna applied for a second booster on March 17. (Full article.)

Do you think the FDA looked at the data in their Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) regarding COVID-19 vaccines for this age group to see if there were any concerns before authorizing a second booster shot for this age group?

Not likely.

As we have previously reported, the FDA does no safety oversight on these vaccines, but simply takes the drug manufacturers’ word for it, allowing them to police themselves. See:

Just Released Documents by Pfizer Show BioNTech Paid FDA $2,875,842.00 “Drug User Fee” for COVID-19 Vaccine Approval

So we will review the data on this age group in VAERS as a service to the public.

Here is what VAERS is reporting for people over the age of 50 following COVID-19 vaccines. (Source

There are currently 14,752 deaths recorded in VAERS for people over the age of 50 following a COVID-19 vaccine, covering a period of 15 months. That’s an average of 983 deaths a month for this age group.

Here are the results for this age group for the previous 30 years following ALL vaccines in VAERS. (Source.)

There were 1,590 deaths recorded following ALL vaccines for the previous 30 years for people older than 50. So if we divide that number by 360 months we get a monthly average of 4.4 deaths.

So we have seen a 22,000% increase in deaths for people over the age of 50 following COVID-19 vaccines, and the FDA just authorized another booster for those who are left in this age group.

But who cares? The corporate media owned by Big Pharma wants everyone to worry about Russia instead right now, while the FDA’s crimes go unpunished and they continue to produce and distribute more deadly shots.

Here is a video I put together last September when the FDA approved the first booster for seniors, which includes whistleblower testimonies from those who saw people die after taking the COVID-19 vaccines.  This is on our Bitchute Channel. (Approx. 20 Min)

This is simply euthanasia and mass murder, and they are getting away with it.

For more:  https://madisonarealymesupportgroup.com/2020/12/21/warning-3150-injuries-in-1st-week-of-covid-vaccines-among-american-healthcare-workers-pregnant-women-included/

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Shocking New COVID Shot Side Effects

https://thehighwire.com/videos/shocking-new-covid-vaccine-side-effects/ Video Here (Approx. 13 Min)

Welcome to the next generation of “vaccine” harms being reported. From mouth blisters to debilitating nervous system disorders, scientists are continuing to report troubling side effects from COVID-19 vaccines.

POSTED: March 25, 2022

Hour long video of adverse events after COVID shots. People dropping and spasming uncontrollably.

Another 20 Minute compilation of athletes, reporters, musicians and others collapsing after shots.

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses

Researcher Blows Whistle on Data Integrity Issues in Pfizer’s COVID Shot Trial

**UPDATE April, 2022**

As they say: “Follow the money”.

More and more is trickling out about Pfizer including whistleblowers stating the shot is a bioweapon, data was falsified, internal emails tried to cover up fetal cell usage, that it copies the mRNA spike protein into human DNA, has caused increased COVID in young kids, and the suspicious coincidence that the 2022 Oscars were sponsored by Pfizer, the company that just happens to have a new Alopecia drug coming out very soon, and the Rock/Smith distraction. Seems everything today is “brought to you by Pfizer.”

https://thevaccinereaction.org/2022/03/researcher-blows-whistle-on-data-integrity-issues-in-pfizers-covid-vaccine-trial/

http://

Researcher Blows Whistle on Data Integrity: Pfizer COVID shot

Brook Johnson was fired for exposing problems with the integrity of Pfizer’s trial data

For researchers who were testing Pfizer’s vaccine at several sites in Texas during that autumn, speed may have come at the cost of data integrity and patient safety. A regional director who was employed at the research organization Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial. Staff who conducted quality control checks were overwhelmed by the volume of problems they were finding. After repeatedly notifying Ventavia of these problems, the regional director, Brook Jackson , emailed a complaint to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Jackson has provided The BMJ with dozens of internal company documents, photos, audio recordings, and emails.

My name is Brook Johnson. I was fired in September of 2020 for being a whistleblower. I was working on Pfizer’s phase III […] trial on their COVID-19 vaccine. My first day on the job was the 8th of September, and from the very beginning I noticed irregularities, things that were questionable. I would bring up the concerns to my managers and it was always… ‘We’re understaffed, we’re really trying hard to make this work.’ At one point, when I was going through e-mails, there were e-mails from ICON begging Ventavia to follow up on severe adverse events that had been reported. There were several e-mails about mislabeled specimens—blood specimens—and nasal swabs.

Read the full investigation: Covid-19: Researcher blows the whistle on data integrity issues in Pfizer’s vaccine trial https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n…

For more:

Category:

Activism, vaccines, Viruses