Long Covid is overblown and often something else, says Oxford professor
Katie Gibbons
The Times
Long Covid is “overblown” and many people who think they have it are actually suffering from something else, a medical expert has said.
Professor Sir John Bell, regius professor of medicine at Oxford University, said that long Covid was “more complicated than people assume” and that “the incidence is much, much lower than people had anticipated”.
On top of the information presented below by Dr. Ruby, please also see this important video with Dr. Ryan Cole (pathologist) who explains how many people were not negatively affected by the shots due to the vials not being kept cold enough. This error actually protected people from potential adverse reactions and death. He too explains that the vials are all inconsistent and have different things in them, including manufacturing debris like stainless steel, aluminium, glass, etc. “Vaccines” are supposed to be 99.9% pure. The COVID shots are horrifically contaminated.
Pfizer has a number of different arms in their trial
All 3 phases are happening at once,which is illegal according to the FDA.
The problem is that each phase uses the phase before it to make accurate assessments for the next phase. That isn’t happening now as all arms are occurring simultaneously.
There are different dosages in each arm as well as a placebo arm, which means some people aren’t getting the “vaccine” at all. Dr. Wodarg of Germany has stated previously that some injections have been found to be nothing but saline, even though people are being told they’re getting the real thing and they’ve not signed up for a formal trial. There are still a lot of unanswered questions with this roll-out and a lack of manufacturer transparency.
While it’s unknown if secret comparison trials are being done without our knowledge, Moderna has been working on mRNA technology for years and has been unable to solve the nanolipid toxicity problem. When the dosage was too low, the mRNA didn’t stick around long enough for the drug to work, and when too high, it became toxic. They were never able to determine an effective nontoxic dose of mRNA in nanolipid. Source
The dosage difference and the placebo are two important reasons why some are having catastrophic adverse reactions including death and some aren’t.
In the booster trial there are two arms, one of which includes a dose of 100mcg, and reference to a dose of 250mcg in a redacted paper. Manufacturers are hiding data. This important video shows that information on the booster shots remains in the dark.
The manufacturing companies are fraudulent by not disclosing this information to the public and informing those in the trials. If you get the jab you are actively enrolled in an ongoing study of which you are an uninformed Guinea Pig.
Regarding “vaccines” being “safe and effective,” please read this informative paper on how vaccine studies as a rule are a “complete methodological mess.”
preclinical safety studies are often not done
pharmacokinetic studies are not required for vaccines
observation periods are extremely short – often only 5-15 days after each dose
placebos are practically never used (they often use other vaccines)
since there is not placebo, there is no true control group
side-effects are literally “observed,” with no blood testing, no neurological exams, or any other exams.
majority of clinical trials are financed by the producers
study reports are often too incomplete
only healthy people are included in trials
“vaccine” is declared “effective” on the basis of being able to induce the production of antibodies, but this end point does not equal protection, immunity, and efficacy.
5 Times Big Pharma Like Pfizer Used Africans as Guinea Pigs
Nov. 2020
If you truly are concerned about racism, this right here is systemic racism of the worst sort along with the atrocity of what Bill Gates did in India and what our own government did destroying evidence showing little black boys who got the MMR vaccine on time developed autism at a much greater rate.
Why isn’t this racism addressed? Because the golden-calf of vaccines is involved, which must not have a word uttered against it.
“Are we going to continue with discrimination and segregation in the United States of America?” Christina Parks, molecular biologist
GENEVA, Sept 28 (Reuters) – More than 80 aid workers including some employed by the World Health Organization (WHO) were involved in sexual abuse and exploitation during an Ebola crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo, an independent commission said on Tuesday. (See link for article)
Can you blame Africans for being skeptical of and refusing a fast-tracked, experimental “vaccine” when they continue to endure this type of abuse?
What Happens Next as the COVID-19 Narrative Crumbles
Bret Weinstein and Heather Heying (both have PhDs in Biology) discuss what will happen next to the public health tyrants in the U.S. and around the world as the COVID-19 narrative continues to crumble. What is their plan B?
“Whoever planned this. It’s all planned.” – Dr. Bhakdi
“This system being put into place is based on lies.” Dr. Yeadon
“One of our problems here is the assumption that this is like every other vaccine we’ve ever seen. And it’s not.” – Dr. Malone
50% of health care providers are absolutely not getting this injection. We don’t trust the data. The fox guarded the hen house. The companies did their own data. – Dr. Cole
“And with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody.” – Kary Mullis, creator of PCR
In the Israeli TV news report below, the ugly truth comes out: The “vaccinated” can get and spread COVID to others just as easily as the unvaccinated.
Read the sub-titles:
For 60 years of age and up, 90% of new COVID cases were in the fully “vaccinated”, while 10% were in the partially “vaccinated” or the unvaccinated.
viral loads in both “vaccinated” and unvaccinated are the same, indicating that both groups can transmit the disease equally. Based upon this, the reporter points out the illogic of exempting “vaccinated” people from quarantine as they are clearly transmitting disease. He also states that this topic was taken off the table in an attempt to keep motivation high for people to get “vaccinated.”
whistleblowers are coming forward stating the number of “vaccine” damaged is much higher than is being reported.
According to Dr. Rose, 6% of all “breakthrough cases”(people contracting COVID after being fully “vaccinated”) results in death. This fact challenges manufacturer’s claims that the injections prevent death from COVID.
This short video with Dr. Ruby explains why some experience horrific reactions to the jabs and others don’t. In sum, those getting the COVID jabs are in an ongoing clinical study. People are assigned to different arms of the study and are receiving differing dosages – including one arm of the study getting a saline placebo. Everyone is told and believes they are getting the “vaccine” but some are only getting salt water and some are getting dosages so low it won’t work at all. Others are getting toxic dosages that will negatively impact them. Think Russian Roulette on a mass scale.
It’s also important to consider antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) in that those who get the jabs. They are at risk of a paradoxical reaction that causes them to have a more serious COVID case than if they hadn’t gotten the injection at all – as was shown in all previous animal studies using this technology. Listen to a short video of a research scientist discuss many of these topics as well as the unsafe epitopes within the jabs.
FULLY VACCINATED PEOPLE ARE 65% MORE LIKELY TO BE HOSPITALIZED & 1540% MORE LIKELY TO DIE DUE TO COVID-19 THAN PEOPLE WHO ARE UNVACCINATED
While Americans continue to live with COVID-19, and the Delta variant which brought a second wave of the virus to many parts of the U.S., Dr. Anthony Fauci is warning about another variant, the Mu variant.
While Fauci says that U.S. health officials are taking the new variant “very seriously,” the new strain is nowhere near the dominant one.
Fauci described the Mu variant as having mutations that suggest “it would evade certain antibodies,” such as those in vaccines.
Fauci cited data from Israel showing that immunity from COVID-19 decreased after roughly eight months after receiving the initial vaccine. (See link for article)
___________________
**Comment**
Hopefully it is clear to all now that there will be endless variants in this dystopian nightmare due to viral escape caused by leaky COVID shots which don’t stop transmission or infection. Mu is the 5th known variant – and there will be more to come, just like with the common cold and flu.
The article gives frightening details from Israel where everyone, including children, is required to receive continual boosters or their vaccine pass is not extended. Children under age three must prove their status with a faulty antigenic test.
Can you see the ongoing, never-ending madness, and boosters yet?
Rightly so, there was scuttle over booster shots, and earlier this week, two regulators with the FDA resigned out of frustration and anger over the Biden administration’s plan to roll out COVID-19 booster shots before officials had a chance to approve them. The FDA committee voted 16-2 against authorizing a 3rd booster, but later took a second vote and passed a booster for those over age 65.
A quick glance at the chart above shows deaths after the COVID shot broken down by age. Please notice the alarmingly high numbers that have already died after the jab in the 65 and up age group. Continuing with these shots is akin to genocide. Please remember, whistleblowers are coming out of the woodwork stating that tremendous pressure is being put on healthcare workers to NOT report adverse reactions, despite VAERS only capturing about 1% of actual events, so actual numbers are much, much higher.
Those believing with a religious fervor in vaccines have said their loved one who died after getting the jabwould have suffered so much more without it. The illogic is astounding. Dead is dead. It doesn’t get much worse than that.
Despite experts stating COVID “vaccines” ‘harm more people than they save,’ and an immunologist/virologist stating there is a 1000% increase in VAERS adverse events reports, the Biden administration is determined to jab a needle into every arm. CDC director, Dr. Rochelle Walensky overruled the advisory committee’s recommendation to limit Pfizer’s booster shot for people 65 and older, and instead aligned with the FDA authorization of a 3rd dose for the broader population including healthcare workers, grocery store workers, teachers, and others whose jobs put them at “high risk” of infections, plus prison inmates and those in homeless shelters. Please note the extreme vulnerability of those last two groups.
The elephant in the room of course is the censoring, maligning, and banningeffective medications that are saving lives and render a “vaccine” null and void.This is happening right here in the U.S. and the same people/organizations behind these genocidal injections are also behind this medical tyranny and have changed goal-posts and manipulated statistics to deceive the public. Hospitals have become ‘modern day killing fields’, due to ineffective and dangerous COVID protocols, and patients have had to resort to suing hospitals to obtain appropriate medication. Lastly, doctors are being attacked for prescribing medication and pharmacists are refusing to fill prescriptions.
In this statement from America’s Frontline Physicians, they call the FDA approval “grossly negligent” for the following reasons:
The approval happened years before completion of phase 3 trials.
The injection was authorized for a variant that has faded from circulation.
The current injection is known to be ineffective & “leaky” or will produce stronger variants.
Injection efficacy versus the current Delta strain (and any yet to come) is inferior to safe, effective treatments.
Pfizer unblinded their trial after a few months, eliminating the placebo arm, making the trial all but useless.
FDA panelists have numerous financial and other conflicts of interest as well as the FDA receives industry funding. FDA Commissioner Hahn just accepted a job with the financiers of Moderna which violates the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that requires open forums.
The FDA is a rubber stamp for Big Pharma and the Biden Administration.
The Winter 2021 “AMA COVID-19 Guide: Background/Messaging on Vaccines, Vaccine Clinical Trials & Combatting Vaccine Misinformation,” issued by the American Medical Association raises serious questions about the AMA’s adherence to transparency, honesty, ethics and the moral standards to which it will hold its members
The guide lists nine “key messages” the AMA wants doctors to focus on when communicating about COVID-19. This includes stressing the importance of eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions, the importance of flu vaccines and COVID shots, and expressing confidence in vaccine development
In the guide, the AMA instructs doctors on how to disinform the public using psychological and linguistic tools. This includes explicit instructions on which words to swap for other more narrative-affirming choices
Word swaps include changing “hospitalization rates” to “deaths,” two terms that are not even remotely interchangeable
Swapping the term “Operation Warp Speed” for “standard process” is another rather egregious misdirection. The two are not interchangeable. In fact, they’re diametrically opposed to one another
The Winter 2021 “AMA COVID-19 Guide: Background/Messaging on Vaccines, Vaccine Clinical Trials & Combatting Vaccine Misinformation,”1 issued by the American Medical Association (AMA) raises serious questions about the AMA’s adherence to transparency, honesty, ethics and the moral standards to which it will hold its members.
The AMA was founded in 1847 and is the largest professional association and lobbying group of physicians and medical students in the U.S. According to the AMA itself, its mission is to promote the art and science of medicine and the betterment of public health.
How then do they explain this “COVID-19 messaging guide,” which explicitly teaches doctors how to deceive their patients and the media when asked tough questions about COVID-19, treatment options and COVID shots?
AMA Teaches Doctors How to Deceive
“It is critical that physicians and patients have confidence in the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines as they become available for public use,” the “AMA COVID-19 Guide” states, adding:2
“To overcome vaccine hesitancy and ensure widespread vaccine acceptance among all demographic groups, physicians and the broader public health community must continue working to build trust in vaccine safety and efficacy, especially in marginalized and minoritized communities with historically well-founded mistrust in medical institutions.”
Indeed, the entire guide is aimed at teaching doctors how to foster confidence in the medical profession in general, as it pertains to treatment of COVID-19, but in particular as it pertains to the experimental COVID shots.
The guide provides “suggested narratives” for various engagements, such as when communicating on social media, as sell as “talking points to guide external communications,” such as when being interviewed. It lists nine specific “key messages” that they want doctors to focus on when communicating about COVID-19. These key messages can be summarized as follows:
Express confidence in vaccine development
Stress the importance of vaccines
Highlight the need to combat the spread of vaccine misinformation
Adhere to updated ethical guidance for physicians and medical personnel, which says they have a moral obligation to get vaccinated themselves
Give general vaccine recommendations, such as the recommendation for everyone over the age of 6 months, including pregnant women, to get an annual flu shot
Stress the importance of eliminating nonmedical vaccine exemptions
Highlight the increased availability of flu vaccines, and the importance of getting a flu shot even if you’ve gotten a COVID injection
Highlight the importance of including minorities, both in vaccine trials and as trusted messengers who can “promote social pressure” to get minorities vaccinated and dispel historical distrust in medical institutions
Denounce scientific analyses “predicated on personal opinions, anecdote and political ideologies”
AMA Concerned About Disinformation
On page 7 of the guide, under the science narrative heading, the AMA declares it is “deeply concerned that rampant disinformation and the politicization of health issues are eroding public confidence in science and undermining trust in physicians and medical institutions,” adding that “Science should be grounded in a common understanding of facts and evidence and able to empower people to make informed decisions about their health.”3
To that end, the AMA is calling upon “all elected officials to affirm science and fact in their words and actions,” and for media to “be vigilant in communicating factual information” and to “challenge those who chose to trade in misinformation.”
AMA Then Instructs Doctors on How to Disinform
It’s a disappointment, then, to find the AMA instructing doctors on how to misinform the public using a variety of psychological and linguistic tools. Perhaps one of the most egregious examples of this is the recommended “COVID-19 language swaps” detailed on page 9.
As you can see below, the AMA explicitly instructs doctors to swap out certain words and terms for other, more narrative-affirming choices. Shockingly, this includes swapping “hospitalization rates” to “deaths” — two terms that are not even remotely interchangeable!
Hospitalization rate refers to how many people are sick in the hospital with COVID-19, whereas death refers to how many people have died. The first term refers to people who are still alive, and the other refers to patients who are not alive.
It strains credulity that the AMA would actually tell doctors to substitute a factual data point with an outright lie. But with this swap, are they not telling doctors to state that people are dead, when in fact they’ve only been hospitalized with COVID-19?
Another highly questionable word swap is to not address the nitty, gritty details of vaccine trials, such as the number of participants, and instead simply refer to these trials as having gone through “a transparent, rigorous process.”
Swapping the factual term “Operation Warp Speed” for “standard process” is another outrageous misdirection. The two simply aren’t interchangeable. In fact, they’re actually diametrically opposed to one another. Standard process for vaccine development includes a long process of over a decade and a large number of steps that were either omitted or drastically shortened for the COVID shots.
Following standard process is what makes vaccine development take, on average, 10 years and often longer.Operation Warp Speed allowed vaccine makers to slap together these COVID shots in about nine months from start to finish. You cannot possibly say that the two terms describe an identical process.
The Power of Language
Other language swaps are less incredulous but still highlight the fact that the AMA wants its members to help push a very specific and one-sided narrative that makes power-grabbing overreaches and totalitarian tactics sound less bad than they actually are, and make questionable processes sound A-OK.
Language is a powerful tool with which we shape reality,4 because it shapes how we think about things. As noted by storyteller and filmmaker Jason Silva:5
“The use of language, the words you use to describe reality, can in fact engender reality, can disclose reality. Words are generative… We create and perceive our reality through language. We think reality into existence through linguistic construction in real-time.”
For example, “lockdown” sounds like involuntary imprisonment imposed by a totalitarian regime, which is what it is, whereas “stay-at-home order” sounds far less draconian. After all, “home” is typically associated with comfort and safety.
The same goes for using “COVID protocols” in lieu of “COVID mandates, directives, controls and orders.” “Protocols” sounds like something that is standard procedure, as if the COVID measures are nothing new, whereas “mandates, controls and orders” imply that, indeed, we’re in medical fascism territory, which we are.
How to Steer, Block, Deflect and Stall Inconvenient Questions
The AMA could have instructed its members to simply stick to the facts and be honest — and in some sections, it does do that — but it doesn’t end there. Rather, the AMA provides a full page of instructions on how to steer the conversation, and how to block, deflect and stall when faced with tough questions where an honest answer might actually break the official narrative.
Here’s a sampling of these instructions. I encourage you to read through page 8 of the guide, and pay attention to these psychological tricks when listening to interviews or reading the news.
Interviewing techniques
Steer the conversation back to the narrative by saying:
“Before we leave that matter, let me add …”
Block a tough question by saying:
“That’s [proprietary, confidential etc], but what I can tell you is …”
Deflect an unwanted question by saying:
“That’s a common misperception but the reality is …”
Redirect away from an unwanted question, back to the official narrative by saying:
“I don’t have the details on that, but what I know is …”
Stall by saying:
Repeat the question asked, or acknowledge the question by saying, “I’m glad you asked …”
It’s worth noting that the AMA also stresses that: 1) Doctors are to speak for the AMA, and 2) doctors are NOT to offer their personal views. Speaking for the AMA is listed under “Your Responsibilities” when being interviewed, while not discussing personal views is listed under “Interview Don’ts.”
AMA Is Rapidly Eroding All Credibility
The AMA’s guidance isn’t all bad. Some of its advice makes perfect sense. But the inclusion of language swaps that result in false statements being made, and tools for steering, blocking, deflecting, redirecting and stalling in order to avoid direct answers do nothing but erode credibility and thus trust in the medical community.
Its direct instruction to not share personal views is another trust-eroding strategy. When people talk to their doctor, they want to hear what that doctor actually thinks, based on their own knowledge and experience.
They don’t expect their doctor — or a doctor appearing in an interview — to simply rehash a narrative dictated by the AMA. If we cannot trust our medical professionals to give their honest opinions and give direct answers, there’s little reason to even discuss our concerns with them, and that’s the opposite of what the AMA claims it seeks to achieve.
The AMA is concerned about the proliferation of misinformation and eroding trust, yet it’s telling its members to keep their professional views to themselves and lie about COVID deaths. With this guidance document, the AMA is essentially implicating itself as a source and instigator of medical misinformation that ultimately might injure patients.
In a Stew Peters Show interview (see top of this article), Dr. Bryan Ardis criticized the AMA guidance document, pointing out that while the AMA claims it put out the guidance to prevent political ideologies from dictating medicine, it is actually proving that the AMA itself is deferring to political ideology rather than medical facts.
The AMA wants its members to act as propagandists for a particular narrative — using “politically correct language” — rather than sharing information and acting in accordance with their own conscience and professional insight. As noted by Peters:
“If a doctor’s just going to repeat what the AMA tells them, why have doctors at all? You can get plenty of starving propagandists at any liberal college, but instead we want to turn our medical professionals into ideological zombies with stethoscopes.”
__________________
**Comment**
If you are a Lyme/MSIDS patient, you can be thankful there are still doctors willing to think for themselves. Lyme literate doctors defy convention and use their own brains. Recently I posted an article about how an independent doctorcould save your life. This has certainly held true for the issue of tick-borne illness, but also is true for COVID and many other hotly contested illnesses due to the politicization of medicine and the corruption in science.
This important 8 min. video reveals why the AMA is corrupt. Similarly to how ILADS broke off from the IDSA due to corruption, the AAPS broke off from the AMA for similar reasons. This excellently done short video gives the sordid history of the AMA and how from inception its major goal is to completely monopolize medicine with the help of the Rockefellers. The AMA was found guilty in a court of law of trying to eliminate the chiropractic profession.
I’m thankful for recent papers where scientists remind us that hypotheses are not misinformation and conjecture.True science embraces alternative hypotheses, contradictory arguments, verification, refutability, and controversy. Departing from this principle risks establishing dogmas, abandoning the essence of science, and, even worse, paving the way for conspiracy theories. Further, allowing scientists, doctors, and public health‘authorities to have conflicts of interest also hurts real science due to bias.
