**UPDATE Sept. 1, 2021**

The Chicago internist who administered ivermectin to Nurije Fype (the woman in the story below) testified at a court hearing that Fype was weaned off a ventilator & discharged after receiving small amounts of ivermectin for 20 consecutive days. True to form, the ‘authorities that be’ say she may have recovered on her own. The CDC reiterates its warning to doctors that ivermectin is not authorized or approved by the FDA for the prevention or treatment of COVID, but they are quite content the FDA approved the Pfizer COVID jab:

  • despite no oversight or control group receiving a placebo
  • when absolute risk is taken into account the “approved” Pfizer shot has an efficacy of just .84%
  • the Pfizer clinical trail study design warning against proximity and potential transmission of side effects of the “vaccine”
  • JFK and Dr. Nass state the FDA appears to be purposely tricking citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product due to the bizarre way it was approved
  • leaked Pfizer indemnification agreement issue gives Pfizer complete indemnity, gives the purchaser no way of canceling the contract, demands countries put up sovereign assets including bank reserves, military bases, embassy buildings and more as collateral, and admits that long-term effects & efficacy are not currently known and there may be adverse effects.

Yet ivermectin, a drug on the WHO list of essential medicine that has been used for decades is now suddenly dangerous.  Think about that.


Judge Orders Hospital to Give COVID Patient Ivermectin

— Drug to be given to comatose Illinois patient after docs refused
A box and blister pack of Ivermectin Tablets

Despite no evidence of efficacy in the treatment of COVID-19, an Illinois judge has ordered a hospital to give ivermectin to a comatose patient with few options left.

Judge James Orel of DuPage County ordered Edward-Elmhurst Hospital to allow 68-year-old COVID-19 patient Nurije Fype to receive the drug, even though it isn’t endorsed by federal health agencies, the Chicago Tribune reported.

Fox 32 Chicago reported that Fype, who has been in the intensive care unit since early last month and is currently on a ventilator, has since received her first dose.

Her daughter, Desareta Fype, enlisted the help of a New York law firm that has taken on other ivermectin cases to force the hospital’s hand after none of its doctors would agree to administer the drug, according to the local media outlets. The Tribune reported Tuesday that an outside doctor was granted credentials at the hospital to administer the ivermectin. (See link for article)



The only reason this family member even heard of Ivermectin was due to another judge ordering a hospital to give it to a dying woman.  The family and attorneys believe ivermectin saved her life

You know it’s bad when the courts have to get involved for life-saving medical treatment.

The Medscape article states the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) posted its own review and analysis of ivermectin’s anti-viral/anti-inflammatory properties on its website, as if it’s a quack group publishing fake news.  

But this is where we are currently at – which is nothing new for Lyme/MSIDS patients.  We’ve been straddling this ugly polarized fence for over 40 years – understanding our public ‘authorities’ are biased, ignore world-wide research, and have vested interests (money and power), which make them untrustworthy and incapable of making public health policy.

These bought-out “Health regulators” caution its use as it is not “approved” for the prevention & treatment of COVID, and then lists truly “rare” side effects of nausea, vomiting, limb swelling, drop in blood pressure, and other adverse reactions. Ivermectin has decades of safe use.  Not to mention, the dosage for COVID is minuscule and typically consists of approximately 4 doses in total – hardly enough to cause any side-effects at all.

Evidently the FDA needs additional testing done to make up its mind – despite the plethora of research already done on its effectiveness for COVID.

For more:  

These public ‘authorities’ bad-mouthing, censoring, and banning Ivermectin, HCQ, and other treatments have severe conflicts of interest and should not be entrusted with public health.

Lastly, I’ve written this article to demonstrate how the CDC rigs treatment guidelines for their own purposes. This article reveals how the CDC insists upon their own faulty tests, again, for their own purposes, which is a threat to national security.  By controlling testing and treatment guidelines, they then effectively control the narrative about a disease and then play numbers games to frighten the public into taking whatever lucrative test, drug or vaccine they stand to profit from.  These public ‘authorities’ then thwart efforts at tracking severe reactions and deaths caused by their lucrative vaccines and injections.  It’s widely known that the VAERS vaccine reporting system only picks up 1% of adverse reactions/deaths  as it is.  Thwarting this system only makes this problem worse. Independent research on VAERS states the system is “utterly inadequate.”

Our conflict-riddled public ‘authorities’ have a lot to answer for.  We truly need a CDC/NIAD/FDA walkaway movement.


%d bloggers like this: