**UPDATE – Sept. 7, 2021**

Children’s Health Defense (CHD) filed suit against the FDA for their allegedly deceptive, rushed licensure of Pfizer’s Comirnaty “vaccine” for COVID that has served as a “bait and switch”allowing Pfizer, the Biden administration, the U.S. military and employers to exhort people to take “licensed” vaccines when the injections available and being administered are not the approved ones, but the same injections under the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). 

AAPS Releases Statement on FDA ‘Approval Letter’ For COVID Injection

The expected FDA “approval letter” for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was issued on Aug 23, and the Biden Administration immediately called on companies to require vaccination. “Full approval” would remove the legal impediment that vaccines only available under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) must be voluntary and cannot be mandated.

A statement released by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) noted that the FDA’s “approval letter” actually approves a biologics license application (BLA) from BioNTech Manufacturing GmbH in Mainz, Germany, for its product COMIRNATY. FDA extended the EUA for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which is legally distinct from, though in most other respects the same as Comirnaty.

“Full approval does not actually apply to vials not labeled ‘Comirnaty,’” AAPS states.

In any event, AAPS notes that “bureaucratic approval does not abrogate the right of individuals to give or withhold informed consent to medical interventions.”

AAPS points out that the approval bypassed the normal advisory committee and public comment requirements.

The FDA-approved package insert for Comirnaty contains a warning about the risk of myocarditis, and post-marketing studies are required. There is no mention, however, of blood clotting or neurologic complications, or the unprecedented number of lethal and disabling complications reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), states AAPS.

“AAPS opposes vaccine mandates, supports the need for fully informed consent, and affirms the right of patients to refuse medical treatment even if it is recommended by their physician(s).”

___________________

**Comment**

According to this interview with Dr. Robert Malone, inventor of messenger RNA technology, the FDA documents do NOT indicate full approval for the Pfizer jab, but rather approves the jab by BioNTech, a German vaccine corporation, for an injection that does not in fact exist yet.

  • Pfizer’s own labeling suggests that its current jab authorized under EUA is the same as Comirnaty, and that the two jabs are basically interchangeable
  • documentation shows the FDA approved a biologics license application for the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine, not the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under current Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)
  • FDA said the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine under EUA should remain unlicensed but can be used “interchangeably” (page 2, footnote 8) with the newly licensed Comirnaty product — while remaining legally distinct
  • “vaccines” approved under EUA provides pharmaceutical companies with blanket liability protection under the PREP ACT 
  • the Pfizer Comirnaty vaccine has no liability shield

John F. Kennedy and Dr. Meryl Nass state:

“The FDA’s clear motivation is to enable Pfizer to quickly unload inventories of a vaccine that science and the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System have exposed as unreasonably dangerous, and that the Delta variant has rendered obsolete.”

The FDA appears to be purposefully tricking American citizens into giving up their right to refuse an experimental product.

In sum, the media is busy spinning the narrative that the FDA has “approved” COVID “vaccines”.  To be clear, the FDA has NOT approved the Pfizer BioNTech jab, nor any jab for 12-15 year olds, nor any boosters. The FDA has NOT licensed any Moderna or Johnson & Johnson jabs, so the vast majority if NOT ALL jabs in the U.S. remain unlicensed EUA products.  

If somebody orders you to get the vaccine: Ask to see the vial. If it says “Comirnaty,” it’s a licensed product. If it says “Pfizer-BioNTech,” it’s an experimental product, and under 21 U.S. Code 360bbb, you have the right to refuse.  If it comes from Moderna or Johnson & Johnson (marketed as Janssen), you have the right to refuse.
The FDA is playing bait and switch with the American public.  Source
  • The change the name switcheroo tactic has been done before with the AstraZeneca shots to attempt hiding the deadly nature of the injections.  Rest assured, the reason they changed the name is due to the fact Pfizer has “insufficient stocks” of Comirnaty but plenty of the Pfizer-BioNTech jab (EUA, experimental product).  
  • Further, a preprint paper shows “vaccinated” health care workers carry 251 times the viral load in their noses, than the unvaccinated, showing widespread “vaccine” failure.  Efficacy for the Pfizer vaccine is anywhere from 17% to 42%, which far below the 50% regulatory standard to even have a vaccine on the market.
  • Clinical trails were designed to take two years, yet the Washington Post, states this is the fastest approval (4 months) in the FDA’s history. This approval now allows doctors to give boosters before the FDA clears them.  The trials also did not have a control group receiving a placebo.
  • According to expert statements in this article, Pfizer’s scheme to churn out ‘variant-specific’ injections will lead to more variants. Think,“boosters without end,” lining the pockets of corrupt public health ‘authorities’ and Big Pharma.
  • Last but not least, leaked information on Pfizer indemnification agreements with countries are shocking to say the least and require complete indemnity, and are abusively demanding that countries put up sovereign assets, including bank reserves, military bases & embassy buildings as collateral for expected vaccine injury lawsuits.
  • And frighteningly, the very organization guiding doctors on immunization practices in children, the AAP CATCH Program, is funded by Pfizer.  

It’s common knowledge in Lymeland that corrupt public health ‘authorities’ with vested interests purposely change definitions, muddy the waters, and work in the dark. With Lyme, it’s a simple disease with a simple fix affecting few people UNTIL a lucrative vaccine is in the works. Then, all of a sudden – from everywhere on cue, Lyme is a horrible pandemic affecting the world and causes horrible symptoms.

Aren’t you tired of being their useful pawn – used to line their pockets?  I sure am.