A few weeks back, at the World Economic Forum (WEF) meeting in Davos, Bill Gates said some surprising things. In the course of a 56-minute panel discussion the vaccine-pusher extraordinaire admitted (starting at the 18:22 mark) that the Covid vaccines do not block infection and that the duration of whatever protection they bring to the table is extremely short.
He later talked (starting at 51:00 mark) of the absurdity of implementing any Covid passport program—and one can logically deduce any other measure to segregate the vaccinated from the unvaccinated—when the injections have shown no ability to do the least that one should expect from a vaccine: prevent infection and transmission.
These admissions violently kick the stool out from under the arguments made in favor of the more assaultive and damaging Covid “containment measures” taken in the past two years, many of which are still being pursued with pitiless vigor by public officials, CEOs, and educational “leaders” all around the world. (See link for article & video)
___________________
**Comment**
This article is extremely important to read as it clarifies how elites manipulate with words.
SUMMARY:
Gates uses the “limited hangout,” or “save the frame” rhetorical model for handling the loss of faith among the ranks in the face of the injections abject failure.
The key is his statement, “The ‘vaccines’ have saved millions of lives,” which is utterly false.
The author points out the work of cognitive linguist George Lakoff and political wordsmith Frank Luntz and the extraordinary power of rhetorical framing and the tendency of the human brain to subordinate careful analysis of empirically proven details to embrace an overarching cognitive metaphor that appeals to deeper cultural and emotional values.
In other words, Gates is encouraging his minions that they are on a great moral crusade and that even though there’s been minor problems along the way – don’t give up.
This overarching metaphor of being heroic and “saving lives” completely trumps any creeping doubts about ‘vaccine’efficacy and the reality that these injections have been linked to more adverse reactions & death than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS, as well as the fact that medicine should be directed at individuals – not groups in a one-sized fits all approach.
The same rhetorical framing is being used by the U.S. government when it links the waning of the ‘pandemic’ with the ‘vaccines,’ when again the ‘vaccines’ do not stop transmission or infection and have been linked to horrific side-effects and death. These corrupt organizations and elites never mention natural immunity and are attempting to rewrite science by stating that only ‘vaccines’ promote immunity. Make no mistake, they are robbing us of our bodily sovereignty by massaging their words.
The goal with using repetitive rhetorical framing is to preserve, in the face of abundant empirical evidence to the contrary, the frame that forced ‘vaccines’ are the great slayer of the ‘pandemic’ and the gift of freedom.
In an unprecedented totalitarian move, an advisory put out by the U.S. Surgeon General is recommending that Big Tech companies (Facebook, Twitter, Youtube, etc) impose consequences for accounts that violate the private companies’ own policies. In other words the government is telling privately owned companies what to do – particularly with regard to what they call ‘misinformation’, defined as ‘information that is false, inaccurate, or misleading according to the best available evidence.’
A group of the world’s top virologists held secretive private discussions in February 2020 on “all theories” of the origins of COVID-19 days after they began drafting an influential article that would attempt to debunk the lab-leak theory, newly reported emails reveal.
The group was led by Wellcome Trust Director Jeremy Farrar and University of Sydney virologist Edward Holmes. Members of these discussions included then-National Institutes of Health Director Dr. Francis Collins and the U.S. government’s top pandemic spokesman, Dr. Anthony Fauci.
A Freedom of Information Act request by U.S. Right to Know reveals that their discussions on the pandemic’s origins continued on Feb. 7, 2020, three days after an article purporting to show the virus “is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus” was drafted and a week after a previously reported conference call on Feb. 1. (See link for article)
_________________
SUMMARY:
U.S. Right To Know Got 6 pages of fully redacted notes from the Feb. discussion.
They were; however, able to see typical government duplicity due to the fact the group considered the lab leak in private but vigorously dismissed it publicly. The group also refused to comment on the issue.
There is a potential conflict of interest due to the fact EcoHealth Alliance received federal grants from Fauci’s agency to study Coronaviruses and had sub-awarded nearly $600,000 to the Wuhan lab in years preceding the pandemic.
Albert Benavides spent twenty-five years as a revenue cycle management expert. He ran the ultra-complex medical billing operations that exist at some of America’s largest hospitals. At one point he managed the 4th-largest diagnostic laboratory in the country, and he also ran his own billing company for a while.
Albert is one of America’s foremost experts on how medical recordkeeping works, and that makes him also one of America’s foremost experts on the VAERS database. VAERS, you’ll remember, is the database of all the illnesses, ailments, and deaths that take place after somebody gets a vaccine in this country. (See link for video and article)
____________________
SUMMARY:
over the past two months more than 12,500 records have vanished in the past nine weeks
Marty Makary , Professor, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
People don’t trust the CDC. Here’s one example illustrating why. Two weeks ago, with no outcomes data on COVID-19 booster shots for 5-to-11-year-olds, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) vigorously recommended the booster for all 24 million American children in that age group. The CDC cited a small Pfizer study of 140 children that showed boosters elevated their antibody levels—an outcome known to be transitory.
When that study concluded, a Pfizer spokesperson said it did not determine the efficacy of the booster in the 5-to-11-year-olds. But that didn’t matter to the CDC. Seemingly hoping for a different answer, the agency put the matter before its own kangaroo court of curated experts, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).
I listened to the meeting, and couldn’t believe what I heard. At times, the committee members sounded like a group of marketing executives. Dr. Beth Bell of the University of Washington said “what we really need to do is to be as consistent and clear and simple as possible,” pointing out that the committee needed “a consistent recommendation which is simple.” (See link for article)
__________________
**COMMENT**
Important excerpt:
The one dissenting vote came from Dr. Keipp Talbot of Vanderbilt University, who courageously said vaccines, while extremely effective, “are not without their potential side effects.” She questioned the sustainability of vaccinating the population every six months. Many experts agree with her, but they don’t have a platform to speak….
And this, my friends, is how you corner the market.
is behind the persecution of doctors who defy the accepted narrative
receivessecret payments and is not a government entity as it not only receives billions in tax dollars annually but receives private funding through the CDC foundation a “tax-free slush fund, wasting tax dollars.” It received 2.3 MILLION last year from the Gates Foundation.
politicians used information from your cell phone to target you
Predictwise gave rankings on whether you stayed home, got your “vaccine,” booster, etc. If you followed orders you got a good COVID score ranking, if you didn’t – well, too bad for you. Source
I would like to add to this list (although this is hardly a conclusive list):
2009 CDC finds hardly any cases of Swine Fluwas Swine Flu or any sort of flu – but hides it from public
2009 CDC stops counting Swine Flu cases yet miraculously estimates there are 22 MILLION cases fear-mongering the public into getting vaccinated
2012 CDC states Morgellons is not infectious – just cotton fibers. To this day they will not accept independent researching showing borrelia involvement.
2016 CDC states there is insufficient evidence that Zika causes microcephaly, but weeks later, after plopping it into “Shepherd’s’ criteria they magically announce it does (despite it meeting only 3 of 7 criteria)
2016 CDC scientists create group SPIDER (Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence and Ethics in Research) and cite numerous scandals involving scientific corruption within CDC
2017 CDC spends $222 million on Zika based on one autopsy – but runs out of money and begs for more
2017 CDC completely ignores research showing 5 out of 5 brains of children with autism have high levels of aluminum
CDC uses front groups (NACCHO, ECBT, AAP, IAC) to combat health freedom
2020 CDC refuses accurate COVID-19 tests, insists on making its own. To this day does not have an accurate test, thereby making all U.S. numbers meaningless due to faulty testing
2020 CDC Dr. Fauci secures $2 billion for COVID-19 vaccine, despite research on the SARS vaccine showing poor outcomes – even deaths, fast tracks COVID-19 vaccine (bypassing animal testing, and using limited human testing). Even vaccine proponents are worried.
Join Dr. Bill Rawls during this LIVE WEBINAR + Q&A on Wednesday, June 22nd, at 8pm EDT as he answers your hard, complicated, and uncommon questions. Anything is fair game, and Dr. Rawls wants to help you find answers.
Sample topics covered during the webinar will include:
Is the CD57 test actually helpful in diagnosing Lyme?
Which herbs or supplements can be used while pregnant?
Is genetic testing to determine which herbs to take beneficial?
Should protection be used during sex to prevent the transmission of Lyme between partners?
Numerous other uncommon questions!
Join us for this LIVE Q&A and bring your most pressing questions!
CHARLESTON, WV – Gov. Jim Justice today announced that, after receiving the results of his bloodwork, his doctors have confirmed a diagnosis of Lyme disease.
Gov. Justice will remain on antibiotics for several weeks to continue fighting the infection.
“I’m feeling better every day,” Gov. Justice said. “I always want to first thank God above for all of our blessings. Additionally, I thank my doctors for all they’ve done, and I appreciate all the West Virginians who have expressed their wishes for my speedy recovery.
“I remind all West Virginians, when you go outdoors, monitor yourself for ticks and use insect repellent to stay safe.”
The FDA vaccine advisory panel unanimously voted 21-0 to recommend Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines for infants and young children, stating the totality of the evidence available shows the benefits of the vaccines outweigh the risks of use. It helps when you get hundreds of thousands of dollars from Pfizer like committee member Arnold Monto.
The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) ignored pleas from experts, the vaccine injured and a congressmanrepresenting 17 other lawmakers to halt authorization until questions about the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines for the nation’s youngest children could be properly addressed.
Fauci even admits there are ZERO studies in children showing boosters reduce hospitalization or death. Senator Rand Paul, a medical doctor, explains that the only studies show people produce antibodies after the injections, but that many researchers question whether this shows efficacy or not.
Paul also pushed for information on how the NIH has continuously refused to release information on their royalties. “The NIH continues to refuse to voluntarily divulge the names of scientists who receive royalties and from which companies. Over the period of time from 2010 to 2016, 27,000 royalty payments were paid to 1800 NIH employees. We know that not because you told us but because we forced you to tell us through the Freedom of Information Act. Over $193 million was given to these 1800 employees.Can you tell me that you have not received a royalty from any entity that you ever oversaw the distribution of money in research grants?”
BTW: fully “vaxxed” and double boosted Dr. Anthony Fauci got COVID anyway, similarly to millions of others – continuing to show the futility of the injections. Please see this important article on how the CDC is withholding data and skewing “vaccine” effectiveness to prevent “vaccine” hesitancy and how you can not trust any numbers or data from this corrupt organization.
This important video on the Dr. Jane Ruby show, interviews Canadian Physician and molecular biologist, Dr. Daniel Nagase, who clearly explains how the bioweapon shots from ALL of the companies are poisoning human DNA for generations.
And go here for the latest VAERS data showing these shots are connected to more adverse reactions & deaths than any other vaccine in the history of VAERS.
What VRBPAC Got Wrong: Who Will Hold FDA and VRBPAC Accountable for Failing America?
VRBPAC Members Saw All the Same Information You Will See Here, But Voted Unanimously Anyway to Recommend Approval of a Worse Then Futile Vaccine for Toddlers and Babies
Here’s a few things VRBPAC members saw and voted to recommend approval anyway:
They Proceeded for Recommendation of Approval Based on a Guess that Three Doses Will Correct Negative Efficacy.Pfizer has a serious problem: their two dose data reflected the reality I’ve been reporting about (and predicted) since the Israeli and Barnstable County data came out: the confidence interval for their estimate of the number cases prevented by three doses of their vaccine points, if anything, to negative efficacy (-369.1 to 99.6). The confidence interval crosses zero. The problem is not just that the result is based on a ridiculously small number of data points. See Point 2.
The problem also is that this result confirms (validates) the result of the two-dose vaccine. Their measure of vaccine efficacy was only 14.5% seven days after the second dose the confidence intervals crossed zero, so they were not statistically significant.
They relied on proxy outcome measures (neutralizing antibodies). Neutralizing antibodies sound good, but they are the wrong antibodies (the Wuhan-1 virus is extinct). Look at the antibody response to Omicron (Pfizer):
I predict the entire vaccination program is going to drive COVID-19 numbers up across the board routinely and on a regular, ongoing basis due to antibody dependent enhancement, as predict by Dr. Fantini’s analysis.
Given these three points alone, FDA might just as well be staring at a blank sheet of paper and rubberstamp the approval.Look at the confidence interest after Dose 2 and Dose 3.
No one raised the issue of Failure to Meet FDA’s required 50% efficacy. Moderna and Pfizer’s own endpoint data fall short of the 50% mark. Pfizer decreased their dose and this seems to have decreased the reported adverse events. But we’ll get to the real problem with adverse events shortly.
Their numbers are ridiculously small. Pfizer showed an estimate of of 80.3% vaccine efficacy is based on – get this – 7 cases in the placebo group and 3 in the vaccine group. Notice the emblazoned 80% – as if that data point has any basis in reality.
They are ignoring the risk of altered neurodevelopment. The Moderna vaccine especially had high numbers of high fevers (>104°). Many studies exist that show that high fever following vaccination is associated with autism, especially if the kids are given acetominophen. Please see: https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/three-years-later-after-ipak-alerted
Moderna presented antibody data against the reference strain (Wuhan-1). But We don’t only care about how good a vaccine is at generating antibodies. Moderna knows this. VRBPAC knows this. Now you know this, too.
9. Inconsistent case definition. Moderna only ran PCR tests if patients in the vaccinated group had two symptoms. In other words, they made up their own clinical designation of “COVID-19”. Under CDC’s case definition (which is also not correct), Moderna’s data show that in kids 2 to 5, “vaccine efficacy” was 36.8% but under Moderna’s new definition, 46.4%. Moderna also used antigen tests, making any measure of efficacy incomparable to other studies.
10. Risk of Hospitalization Cited Out of Context.
One committee member compared the risk of a child dying from Covid to a person being struck by lighting (see my calculations here):
They showed the Omicron hospitalization rate “surge”:
Yet it’s much lower than that for influenza, per CDC:
2015-2016 Hospitalization Rate (Per 100,000 cases) from Influenza (Source: CDC)
11. They May Have Broken the Rules of Engagement for Open Meetings
Any reasonable person would expect that public open meetings held by organizations such as VRBPAC would know and follow administrative rules for open meetings. How is it then that VPBPAC members only managed to ask questions and voice their opinions on how necessary (or not) COVID-19 vaccination in children might be AFTER the votes were made to approve the vaccine for children under 5?
Dr. Meryl Nass was denied an opportunity to speak in the public comment period, yet the same pro-vaccine mother was able to speak two days in a row. Thus, the public may have been denied the opportunity to contribute their comments. This is being looked at by lawyers; if it true the FDA broke the rules of open meetings, then any ethical judge would rule that this vote to recommend is null and void ab initio.
Madison Area Lyme Support Group 