Madison Area Lyme Support Group

In late 2020, Brianne Dressen began to spend hours in online communities for people with Long Covid, a chronic, disabling syndrome that can follow a bout with the virus. “For months, I just lurked there,” says Dressen, a former preschool teacher in Saratoga Springs, Utah, “reviewing post after post of symptoms that were just like my own.”

Dressen had never had COVID-19. But that November, she’d received a dose of AstraZeneca’s vaccine as a volunteer in a clinical trial. By that evening, her vision blurred and sound became distorted—“I felt like I had two seashells on my ears,” she says. Her symptoms rapidly worsened and multiplied, ultimately including heart rate fluctuations, severe muscle weakness, and what she describes as debilitating internal electric shocks.

A doctor diagnosed her with anxiety. Her husband, Brian Dressen, a chemist, began to comb the scientific literature, desperate to help his wife, a former rock climber who now spent most of her time in a darkened room, unable to brush her teeth or tolerate her young children’s touch.  (See link for article)

_________________

https://www.tmrjournals.com/article.html?J_num=4&a_id=2402

Current state of knowledge on the excretion of mRNA and spike produced by anti-COVID-19 mRNA vaccines; possibility of contamination of the entourage of those vaccinated by these products

Helene Banoun^1* ()

¹ Pharmacist biologist, Former Inserm researcher, Member of the Independent Scientific Council, Marseille 13000, France.

Abstract

The massive COVID-19 vaccination campaign is the first time that mRNA vaccines have been used on a global scale. The mRNA vaccines correspond exactly to the definition of gene therapy of the American and European regulatory agencies. The regulations require excretion studies of these drugs and their products (the translated proteins). These studies have not been done for mRNA vaccines (nor for adenovirus vaccines). There are numerous reports of symptoms and pathologies identical to the adverse effects of mRNA vaccines in unvaccinated persons in contact with freshly vaccinated persons. It is therefore important to review the state of knowledge on the possible excretion of vaccine nanoparticles as well as mRNA and its product, the spike protein.

Vaccine mRNA-carrying lipid nanoparticles spread after injection throughout the body according to available animal studies and vaccine mRNA (naked or in nanoparticles or in natural exosomes) is found in the bloodstream as well as vaccine spike in free form or encapsulated in exosomes (shown in human studies). Lipid nanoparticles (or their natural equivalent, exosomes or extracellular vesicles (EVs)) have been shown to be able to be excreted through body fluids (sweat, sputum, breast milk) and to pass the transplacental barrier. These EVs are also able to penetrate by inhalation and through the skin (healthy or injured) as well as orally through breast milk (and why not during sexual intercourse through semen, as this has not been studied). It is urgent to enforce the legislation on gene therapy that applies to mRNA vaccines and to carry out studies on this subject while the generalization of mRNA vaccines is being considered.

________________

**Comment**

While the author is correct in stating that excretion studies need to be done, they won’t be, or the studies will be purposely designed for the predetermined outcome that all of this is simply a silly ‘conspiracy theory,’ much like the idea of Lyme/MSIDS being sexually transmitted – or even transmitted by bugs and ways other than ticks. 

“Vaccine” shedding has been talked about for some time now and was even mentioned in the protocol for the Pfizer trial way back in May of 2020.  It mentions the possibility of passage of study product through inhalation, skin contact, passage through semen, and breast milk, with the possibility of adverse reactions from these exposures.

Dr. McCullough wrote a Substack article back in November not only warning of the very real potential, but of the fact that the mRNA shots have been in development by DARPA since 2011 – so there’s been ample time for any needed studies.  They simply don’t want that harmful data out there.

Banoun and McCullough aren’t the only ones piecing this together.

A study back in May, demonstrated the probability that the“vaccinated” have been transmitting antibodies through aerosols.  The study found anti-SARS-CoV-2 specific antibodies on surgical face masks worn by “vaxxed” lab members. They found both IgG and IgA in saliva from “vaxxed” individuals.  They then tested their hypothesis by looking at nasal swabs from “unvaxxed” children living in households in which parents and family members had varying degrees of COVID specific immunity including those unvaxxed, “vaxxed” and COVID-19 recovered.  The swabs acquired from children living in “vaccinated” households revealed readily detectable COVID specific IgG, demonstrating the potential of aerosol-mediated antibody transfer. 

Regarding “Long COVID,” please note the age-old tactic of repeating that it’s “rare.”

How frequently side effects like Dressen’s occur is unclear. Online communities can include many thousands of participants, but no one is publicly tracking these cases, which are variable and difficult to diagnose or even categorize. The symptoms also include fatigue, severe headaches, nerve pain, blood pressure swings, and short-term memory problems. Nath is convinced they are “extremely rare.”

A lie spreads half way around the world while the truth is still putting its shoes on.

The tactic of repeating that it’s “rare” has been done in Lymeland for 40 years until the truth has become so obvious that even the CDC has to quietly, in the dark of night, update its joke of a website, which is full of misinformation, with a grain of truth.

Important excerpts:

The NIH researchers were “trying to help people”…..

As time passed, however, the patients say the NIH scientists pulled back. A September visit Brianne Dressen had scheduled for additional neurologic testing was converted to a telemedicine appointment. In December, Nath asked her to stop sending patients his way. “It is best for such patients to receive care from their local physicians,” he wrote to her.

For patients, the silence from NIH was distressing, especially as they struggled to find care elsewhere. The scientists “took the data and left us hanging,” says a person who traveled to NIH in the spring of 2021. “I have no treatment, I have no idea what’s happening to my body.” Physicians, several patients said, had nothing to offer and sometimes even declared the symptoms imagined.

Nath told Science NIH facilities are not equipped to treat large numbers of patients long-term. Says the health care worker of the effort: “It’s too much for two people at the NIH to do……”

Other researchers note the scientific community is uneasy about studying such effects. “Everyone is tiptoeing around it,” Pretorius says. “I’ve talked to a lot of clinicians and researchers at various universities, and they don’t want to touch it.”

Go here to listen (transcript included) to a “vaccine” injured woman who was gaslit by doctors and loved ones and contemplated suicide.  She states the NIH knows a lot more than they let on. After she and her husband repeatedly pled for help, the NIH flew her and others to the NIH to be evaluated, studied, and in some cases, treated.  But to this day, the public and the medical community are not being informed about the major neurological injuries that can occur post-vaccination—even though the NIH knows early intervention is key for such autoimmune dysfunction.

Lastly, and importantly, one patient who experienced partial facial paralysis, muscle weakness that “left her terrified” she was having seizures or a stroke, intense thirst, and wild swings in heart rate and blood pressure after only a single Moderna shot had this to say:

“I still think the vaccines are great.”

Houston, we have a problem  A very real problem.

This article reveals how many figure-heads all tweeted the following mantra after testing positive after getting the jab:

“I’m grateful to be vaccinated or it would be a lot worse.”

I hope everyone reading this understands that this is a blatant lie.

It is; however, an effective advertising slogan that’s obviously persuaded sane, educated people to completely ignore the reality they’ve experienced, to believe a lie.  That is advertising success.  Too bad lives are at stake.